History - Part 19
Seizing The Inheritance
The question may well be asked, Why must the Jews of today suffer for
the deeds of their forefathers who nearly two thousand years ago crucified
Jesus. Why are the Jews of today subject to a judgment of slaughter for
which they are even now going to the land of Palestine? These are vital
questions and the answer will be found in another parable given by our
Lord. It gives the reason why the verdict against the Jews has been passed
on to their children and their children's children, even to the present
generation. (See Matthew 21:33-46)
Since the House of Israel was away from Palestine, the Nations of the
Jews had usurped the Kingdom. Because of the unrighteous methods of the
Jews of that day, and their rejection of Jesus Christ, it came about as
the Lord had warned in the parable and the Kingdom was taken from them
and given to a nation that would bring forth its fruits (True House of
Israel). This Parable of the Vineyard is a perfectly accurate
description of the conditions leading up to the crucifixion and the
plot to seize the Kingdom.
The Jews are the "husbandmen" in the parable and they refused to receive
the prophets, who were the "servants" in the parable. Later they rejected
and crucified Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who was obviously the "son"
of the parable. What is not generally realized is that there are approximately
twenty centuries between the fulfillment of "This is the heir; come, let
us kill him" and "Let us seize on his inheritance."
Now, after nearly two thousand years have passed, the Zionists are undertaking
to establish a kingdom in Palestine and seize our Lord's inheritance by
violence. Coupled with this is their declaration that the commencement
of a messianic era has come and that they, as a race, have a messianic
destiny. Actually, the Zionists are boldly seeking world control, hoping
to inherit world rulership which belongs to the Lord Jesus Christ alone.
It is also very clear from the parable that, timed with the coming of
the Lord of the vineyard, i.e., the triumphant return of our Lord, is the
climatic move on the part of the "husbandmen" to seize the inheritance.
In the establishment of the Israeli State in Palestine we are seeing the
fulfillment of the final act portrayed in the parable just before the Lord
It is clearly evident to any observant person that the Politicians and
governments of the world are under the control of the Zionist forces and
even American Presidents yield to them, rather than to expose their activities
and risk losing an election or their lives. "It seems to me, when I consider
the power of that entombed gold and the pattern of events...that there
are great, organized forces in the world, which are spread over many countries
but work in unison to achieve power over mankind through chaos. They seem
to me to seek, First and Foremost, the Destruction of Christianity, Nationhood
and Liberty...that was 'the design' which Lord Acton perceived behind the
first of the tumults, the French Revolution, and it has become clearer
with later tumults and growing success. This process does not appear to
me a natural or inevitable one, but a man-made one which follows definite
rules of conspiratorial action. I believe there is an organization behind
it of long standing, and that the great successes which have been achieved
are mainly due to the efficiency with which this has been kept concealed."
(Smoke to Smother, p. 315)
Time will shortly demonstrate to even the most skeptical the identity
of these conspirators who are endeavoring through chaos to enslave mankind.
The center of this great world-wide conspiracy to destroy Christendom,
are those who crucified the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Their plans
are carefully laid for the seizure of His inheritance, the first steps
in the fulfillment of such a program evidenced in the Zionist claims to
a right to Palestine which they have undertaken to possess through acts
of violence (which began when Esau sold his birthright to Jacob).
Furthermore, in their arrogance they have assumed a messianic mission
for their race and in so doing are undertaking to usurp the kingly prerogatives
of Christ, or Lord and King. The verdict of our Lord is therefore just
in its condemnation of these conspirators and their attempt through violence
to seize the Kingdom.
History - Part 20
While I had decided to stop my history lessons at 19; I have changed
my mind due to the requests of several on the list. There will be approximately
20 or 25 more so I will continue.
Synagogue Name Changing
If you will turn to "SHINNUY-HA-SHEM" in the Jewish Encyclopedia, you
may read the synagogue formula for changing the name of an invalid so as
to fool those nincompoop low-brow demons. Such saps! Owing to the Pythagorean
belief in the potency of letters and numbers on their own account, changing
a name can fool the silly things! Was Christ so wrong to call the Pharisees
"Fools and blind!" (Matthew 23:17) with all their asinine books of the
Talmud on vowings, etc., along with running a synagogue of Satan (Revelation
2:9; 3:9)? Did He KNOW His subject?
Read the synagogue formula for fooling the sickness demons: "When the
Righteous Judgement has already decreed death from illness, our saintly
rabbis said: 'Three things annul the decree; and one of them is changing
the name of the patient. We therefore, in conformity with their advice,
have changed the name of (mention here the former name) to the name of
(mention the adopted name) who is now another person" (Note: THAT ought
to fool'em, telling that!) "The decree shall not have any force with regards
The Jewish Encyclopedia relates the following about "amulets," in part:
"By the employment of these amulets anlysis, sciatica, eye and ear ailments,
leprosy, and other evils were to be cured. With a certain date fastened
around the thigh, a man might enter a fiery furnace and came out unscathed."
This is what the Jews say saved Shadrach, Meshack and Abednego whose story
is told in Chapter Three of the Book of Daniel. (Daniel 3:16-27)
"Material and inscription of the Amulet carried according to its purpose.
By its means fish could be caught [This is what Jesus used to catch the
many fish as related in Luke Chapter Five]; the love of a woman secured
and retained [This is how Isaac obtained his wife in Genesis Chapter twenty-four];
the sea crossed dry-shod [Exodus Chapter Fourteen]; wild animals slain
[Judges Chapter Fourteen]; terror diffused through the world [Ezekiel Chapter
Thirty-Two]; communion had with the dead [1 Sam. Chapter Twenty-eight];
a sword obtained which would fight automatically for its owner [Deut. Chapter
Thirty-two]; one's enemies set to tearing each other to pieces [Judges
Chapter Six]; oneself rendered invisible; springs of water found [Exodus
Chapter Seventeen]; cleverness attained [1 Kings Chapter Three]; and many
similarly wonderful things accomplished in one passage a device that is
frequently met with in Babylonian and Egyptian magic is mentioned; namely,
the preparation of an image and working the charm desired by its medium.
The prescription runs: 'If thou desirest to cause any one to perish, take
clay from two river banks and make an image therewith; write upon it the
man's name; then take seven stalks from seven date-trees and make a bow
[here follows the word] with horsehair (?); set up the image in a convenient
place, stretch thy bow, shoot the stalks at it, and with every one say
the prescribed words...adding, 'Destroyed be N., son of N.!'" This is how
Jews believe that these miracles were performed.
Demonology of The Pharisees
All forms of demonology were adopted by the Pharisees and incorporated
into so-called Judaism. Demons of the privy, of the night, of every phase
of nature, were and are catered to by the tenets and customs of this sect.
The Talmud book of Yadayim (hands) is, for example, on ritual hand-washing
in connection with Pharisee demonology. The Talmud is loaded with occult
works and practices.
The Pharisee custom in Christ's time of drizzling water alternately
on the hands, to carry off demons (who presumably live in water) is still
in force. The "Code of Jewish Law" (Schulchan Aruch), which is a digested
"Mishna" of the Talmud, holds that an evil spirit takes over a sleeping
person: "When he rises from his sleep the evil spirit departs from his
entire body excepting from his fingers. From there the unclean spirit does
not depart unless he spills water on them three times alternately. One
is not permitted to walk four cubits without having his hands washed."
(Schulchan Aruch, Vol. 1, Chapter II: Hebrew Publishing Co. 77-9 Delancey
St. New York, copyright 1927).
The Soncino Edition of the Talmud, in the Introduction to Yadayim (handwashing):
"This...rite...formed one of the chief breaches between Jesus and the Pharisees."
(p. 545) When the Pharisees came to Christ, baiting Him about His Apostles
not doing these handwashing rituals, He came back at them, saying that
they were hypocrites, 'teaching for doctrines the commandments of men...Full
well ye reject the commandment of God that ye may keep your own tradition.'"
(Matthew 15) Other such practices are condoned in Judaism.
Despite Moses' orders (Deut. 18:10-12): "There shall not be found among
you any one that maketh his son or daughter to pass through the fire or
that useth divination, or an observance of times [astrology] or an enchanter,
or a witch, or a charmer or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a necromancer.
For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because
of the abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee."
Yet all of these are permitted by Judaistic Pharisee scripture. (see
Jewish Talmud, Sanhedrin 65a-b) Citing this very Scriptural passage, and
reversing it, the Talmudic "sages" hold that calling up demons to aid with
sorcery is not idolatry since demons are not thereby worshiped!
The ancient practice of spirits speaking from the privates by soothsaying
is dwelt upon in Judaism and this practice is loathsomely attributed to
Jesus ("He practiced enchantment by means of his membrum" Talmud, Sanhedrin
"Ye shall not use enchantment nor observe times." (another of Moses'
admonitions in Leviticus 19:26)
The "sages" also distort this clear scripture and declare: "This refers
to those who practice enchantment by means of weasels, birds, and fish"
-- thus forbidding what no one cares to do anyway, and so as to open the
way for pagan practices elsewhere permitted. (Sanhedrin 65a)
The Christian need not wallow in darkness. In the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia
it was already clearly written down that the Pharisees took over "Judaism,"
removed all "obnoxious verbiage" concerning God, such as attributing to
Him Intelligence and control over this world and bestowed all Biblical
powers ascribed to Him to lesser spirits, or "angelic powers."
And, with the angelology and Demonology (of Babylon) and the Ma'asek
Bereshit and Ma'aseh Merkabah, they nullified the Bible into pantheism.
Anthropmophism, or attributing to God any human quality like Intelligence,
Love, or Control, such as God gave man over the animal world, was and is
"obnoxious" to the Pharisee (Jewish Encyclopedia).
The Ma'aseh Mercabah and Ma'aseh Bershit are called in Judaism, the
very basis of this occult gnosticism. Pretending to be based upon Genesis
and Ezekiel's chariot throne of God vision (Ezekiel 1), this last "mystery"
is called "Merkabah."
The words "by other means" are the most significant in the definition
of the Merkabah in the Jewish Encyclopedia (pp. 499-500): "The mysteries
rest on the belief in the reality of things seen in an ecstatic state brought
about by ablutions, fast, fervent invocations, incantations, and by other
means...the Merkabah rider must provide himself with amulets or seals containing
mysterious names...The central figure in the theophany, however, is the
'Prince of the Face,' Metatron...He is the one who imparted to man all
the knowledge of heaven and of the past and the future."
Even burning children to the demon Molech for black occult power is
allowed today by the supreme scriptures of Pharisaic Judaism.
Rabbi Joshua Trachtenberg, listed in Who's Who in American Jewry, in
his defensive yet illuminating book, Jewish Magic and Superstition (Behrmann's,
N.Y., 1939), writing of the age-long reputation of Jews as practitioners
of black magic and all occult demonistic rites, states (Second chapter,
entitled "The Truth Behind the Legend"): "The sources indicate that Jews
were at least acquainted with methods of inducing disease and death, of
arousing and killing passion, of forcing people to do their bidding, of
employing demons for divinatory and other purposes...We find accounts of
the magician's power to project his soul to far-distant places, there to
perform an errand, and then return to his comatose body." (Jewish Magic
and Superstition, Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, p. 13) "Jewish magic...functioned
within the framework of the Jewish religion." (Jewish Magic and Superstition,
Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, p. 15)
Rabbi Trachtenberg also states: "Knowledge of the names, through which
Jewish magic worked, was inaccessible to women, for it required not only
a thorough training in Hebrew and Aramaic, which most of them lacked, but
also a deep immersion in mystical lore from which they were barred...Early
mystical and magical lore was successfully guarded by a limited oral transmission.
The secret lore of the Kalonymides [Note: who brought it from Babylonia]...was
first written down in the 13th Century...Jewish life had turned more and
more inward...and intensive study of the Talmud had become almost its sole
intellectual pursuit...But the German Kabbalah never attained the theoretical
depth of its Spanish counterpart, nor did it exert so much influence."
(Jewish Magic and Superstition, Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, pp. 16-17)
"So we may say that every Jew whose desire led him thither essayed a
little magic in a small way. But it was generally recognized that only
a minor portion of the mystical lore had found its way into books; much
of it remained private, jealously guarded property." (Jewish Magic and
Superstition, Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, p. 18)
In the same work, and under the title of "Forbidden and Permitted,"
Trachtenberg says: "The Bible had pronounced an unqualified condemnation
of sorcery. The Talmud...pursued its customary function of clarifying and
classifying Jewish law, and so broke up the all-inclusive category of sorcery
into several divisions..." Then are cited various hairsplittings, ending
with an admission that the Talmud actually permits the very proscribed
or forbidden acts denounced by the Bible.
Trachtenberg sums up: "From a practical standpoint, they succeeded in
effectively excluding from the proscribed 'magic' all the forms current
among Jews." (Jewish Magic and Superstition, Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, pp.
The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia cites Rabbi Tractenberg's Jewish Magic
and Superstition as a rabbinical authority on these subjects.
Rabbi Trachtenberg: "On Saturday evening, during the Habdalah ceremony
which marks the beginning of the new week, another libation was offered
to the spirits, as part of the ritual. Some of the wine was poured upon
the ground 'as a good omen for the entire week to symbolize good fortune
Rabbi Trachtenberg then proceeds to de-emphasize that this had any religious
significance, and states: "Moses Mat in the 16th Century wrote that this
practice is intended to 'give their portion to the company of Korah,' namely,
to the powers of evil. And that portion was not inconsiderable. As one
rabbi in Silesia remarked, 'If I had the wine that is poured upon the ground
in Austria during Habdalah it would suffice to quench my thirst for a whole
"This custom of pouring out some wine over which a blessing has been
recited, which appears again in the wedding ceremony, may have been considered
by some people not as an offering to the spirits, but as a means of driving
them off." (Jewish Magic and Superstition, p. 167)
Just preceding this, Rabbi Trachtenberg covers various food offerings
to demons such as leaving a loaf of bread and cup of wine "left standing
overnight," which, to quote, is categorized: "as 'setting a table for the
demons.' Yet it continued to be done, sometimes with the frank admission
that 'it extends fulness of blessing over the entire week.'
During the Passover Seder a cup of wine is filled expressly for the
Prophet Elijah, who is believed to visit every Jewish home on that occasion,
and the door is opened for him to enter -- this time the offering is to
a good spirit, rather than an evil one. But during the same service, there
is a late custom, which arose in German-Jewish circles, to pour out a drop
of wine at the mention of each of the ten plagues, possibly to placate
the evil spirits, who may be impelled by the reference to so many disasters
to visit some of them upon the celebrants.
Israel Isserlein's biographer wrote of him, 'He always spilled some
of the water from his cup before drinking,' thus observing a universal
Jewish custom going back to Talmudic times. The explanation then given
was that the water might have been contaminated by a demon --but obviously
merely spilling some of it doesn't purify at all. The intention was to
induce the demon to neutralize the possible ill effect of the water by
making him a libation." (Jewish Magic and Superstition, Behrmann's, N.Y.,
1939,, pp. 166-67)
Tashlik and Kapparah
Rabbi Trachtenberg cites the power of the Kapparah rites in Judaism.
In the first editions of the Shulhan Aruch, an accepted code of Judaism
compiled by Joseph Caro, his reference to Tashlik being a "silly custom"
was deleted, according to Rabbi Trachtenberg, "under the influence of the
16th century Polish annotator, Moses Isserles...The various features of
the ceremony accentuate its superstitions and even magical character."
Tashlik is the current and ancient Pharisee custom of dropping crumbs
into a river or body of water at Rosh-Hashona, or flapping the garments
at demons, as the Hasidim Jews do, to appease them. Brooklyn and Manhattan
bridges in New York, have been much used for this, says the Jewish Encyclopedia
of 1905 (under "Tashlik").
Rabbi Trachtenberg also states: "Fowl are closely associated with the
spirits in Jewish and non-Jewish lore, and are the commonest oblation to
them...The cock is employed to represent a man, the hen, a woman, in many
magic rites. The circles which are described about the head of the individual,
and the numbers three and seven, are well-known magical elements.
The words which effectuate the substitution have all the earmarks of
a typical incantation. In the earlier texts the words 'this is my atonement'
are not present; they were added so that the initials of the Hebrew terms
might form the word hatash, 'which is the name of the angel appointed over
Rabbi Trachtenberg continues: "The belief that evil spirits roost on
roofs occurs often (the Talmud places them under the eaves)...In view of
this requirement that the entrails be thrown on a roof acquires special
significance. Thus analyzed there can be little doubt of the true meaning
of the rite, which is still observed today. It is probably the most blatantly
superstitious practice to have entered Jewish religious usage, for where
the significance of other such practices has long since been lost sight
of, the purpose of this is too apparent to escape the dullest wits...Not
unrelated is the rite of Tashlik, observed on the first day of Rosh-Hashonah
...this ceremony represents merely the latest version of a complex of superstitious
practices centering about the belief in the existence of spirits in bodies
of water...in later times Tashilk was postponed if the first day of the
New Year fell on a Sabbath on the ground that carrying bread was a violation
of the Sabbath rules." (Jewish Magic and Superstition, Behrmann's, N.Y.,
1939, p. 164-165)
History - Part 21
Various "explanations" customarily used as a "whited sepulchre" coverup
for the stark paganism of Pharisaism are here mentioned by Trachtenberg,
and then: "These explanations only too patently evade the main issue, the
bread offering to the spirits ...Under Kabbalistic influence an attempt
was made to limit the rite to shaking one's clothes at the river-side..."
(Jewish Magic and Superstition, Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, p. 166) A picture
appears in the Jewish Encyclopedia showing Jews with bags of bread at the
river-side performing the Tashlik ceremony of appeasing the demons of the
The entire Jewish Talmud book of Yadayim ("hands") is based upon the
superstition that demons live in water. The Talmudist's (Jewish) objective
here is not cleanliness (when they chastized Christ for Him and His disciples
not washing their hands), but getting the "demons" off into water. Small
wonder that Christ would have none of the Pharisee hand-washing voodoo
in His life, because of which the Pharisees upbraided Him mercilessly.
Lilith -- Favorite Demoness
Of the hordes of demons the Jew who would win out must use and dismiss,
none is more prominent than Lilith. Some of the amulets meant to keep her
in check is presented on pages 549-50 of the Jewish Encyclopedia (under
Amulet). Lilith is supposedly jealous of lying-in mothers and their new-born
babies. Her main job is apparently "spawning demons."
In his above noted publication, Rabbi Trachtenberg repeats the Talmudic
tale that "when Adam was parted from Eve, he had relations with female
demons who bore him demonic offspring." He was at this for 130 years, we
are told. Says Trachtenberg (Jewish Magic and Superstition, Behrmann's,
N.Y., 1939, p. 37): "As a result of the legend of Adam's relations with
Lilith (another spelling)...the Liliths were most frequently singled out
as the demons who embrace sleeping men and cause them to have nocturnal
emissions which are the seed of a hybrid progeny...As the demons whose
special prey is lying-in women, it was found necessary to adopt an extensive
series of protective measures against her...We seem to have her a union
of the night demon with the spirit that presides over pregnancy, influenced
no doubt by the character of the Babylonian Lamassu, and the lamiae and
striga of Greek and Roman folklore."
Spirits and Cemeteries
"Obviously the spirits can help as well as harm the living...An observant
visitor to the tomb of Simon bar Yohai, for instance, at Meron, Palestine,
will discern a host of written entreaties for the saint's aid [Note: the
'saint' was a second century Talmudic voodoo-worker associated with the
Zohar, principal multi-volumed work of the Jewish Cabala]...The ancient
practice of visiting the cemetery to entreat the offices of deceased relatives
or scholars persisted...In addition to such individual visits, there grew
up the custom of the entire congregation repairing to the cemetery annually
on several occasions, such as the seven 'rain fasts,' and on Tisha 'B'ab...and
on the eves of New Year and the Day of Atonement, 'that the dead may beseech
mercy on our behalf.'" (Jewish Magic and Superstition by Trachtenberg,
"The custom of washing the hands after a funeral is very widespread...
Efforts were made to find a Biblical precedent for this act, but...there
was a general admission that it was done 'to dispel the spirits of uncleanness'
which cling to one's person, these being 'the demons that follow them home.'"
(Jewish Magic and Superstition, Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, p. 179) Today,
one may note Jews at such places as Temple Sholom, on Lake Shore Drive,
Chicago, Illinois, dripping water on their hands after a funeral.
The Jewish Encyclopedia (under "Cemetery") refers to the custom of visiting
the cemetery to consult the spirits, and cites the Talmud, Niddah 17a.
There it is stated that one "spending a night in a graveyard in order that
a spirit of uncleanness may rest upon him -- to enable him to foretell
the future might sometimes be exposed to danger." (Talmud, Soncino edition,
Naddah, p. 113)
Reference to this practice is also made in Sanhedrin 65b. That cemeteries
are infested with spirits and demons is the general idea.
Rabbi Trachtenberg says: "The future is an open book to the denizens
of the supernatural realm, and like the demons and the angels, the deceased
can by eavesdropping pick up the latest decision of the court on high;
'they flit through the universe to hear what has been decreed.' Then they
report back to intimates on earth, in dreams or personal appearances...But
in general the spirit-world is chary of its secrets and can be induced
to reveal them only by magical means...mystical invocations and occult
rites are effective in forcing the dead to obey the magician's will. The
art of necromancy is a specialized function of sorcery." (Jewish Magic
and Superstition, p. 65)
And: "The official language of the celestial court is Hebrew...This
principle was advanced in the Talmud." (Jewish Magic and Superstition,
Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, p. 74)
In a chapter "The War With the Spirits," Rabbi Trachtenberg states:
"The methods of warding off the spirits fell into three general categories:
1. to drive them away ...2. to buy them off with gifts, to bribe them and
thus conciliate them; 3. to deceive them by disguising their intended victims,
or by pretending that the situation was other than what it was. Each of
these methods, and often two or three of them combined, was known and employed
by Jews even found expression in special ceremonies which have become part
and parcel of Jewish ritual."
Rabbi Trachtenberg mentions putting a severed foreskin in a bowl of
water, with attendants dipping their fingers in bloody fluid, and burying
the circumcizer with the foreskins he has severed, as demonic ritual.
The unluckiness of even numbers except on special nights when four cups
of wine, instead of an odd number may be imbibed, the protective, and divine
nature of Talmud study for blunting demons, and the recitation of the Shema
at night are noted by the Rabbi, and he states: "There was no attempt to
disguise the purpose of this prayer-service; it was frankly admitted time
and again that 'it exists only because of the demons.'"
He quotes: "'at my right Michael, at my left Gabriel, before me Uriel,
behind me Raphael.' This is nothing more than the Jewish version of the
ancient Babylonian incantation, 'Shamash before me, behind me Sin, Nergal
at my right, Ninib at my left,' or 'May the good Shedu at my right, the
good Lamassu at my left,' etc.'" (Jewish Magic and superstition, p. 156)
"The final weapon in the anti-demonic strategy is that of deceit." Apart
from wailers at weddings to deceive the demons into thinking it a sad instead
of glad occasion, breaking a glass at a wedding and the Shofar being blown
to scare the demons, this strategy of deceit, says the Rabbi, is "most
commonly employed in changing an invalid's name so that the spirits who
might be charged with effecting his death would be unable to locate him...just
as criminals adopt aliases to evade the police." (Jewish Magic and Superstition,
Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, p. 168)
Under "Shinnuy-ha-shem" in the Jewish Encyclopedia, one may read the
synagogue formula for changing the name of an invalid so as to fool the
demons: "When the Righteous Judgement has already decreed death from illness,
our saintly rabbis said: Three things annul the decree; and one of them
is changing the name of the patient. We therefore, in conformity with their
advice, have changed the name of (mention here the former name) to the
name of (mention the adopted name) who is now another person. The decree
shall not have any force with regards to him..." Was Christ so wrong to
call the Pharisees "Fools and blind?" (Matthew 23:17)
More on Ritual Murder
Over the centuries, and dating from the time of the Pharisee historian
Josephus, in the 1st Century, Jews have repeatedly been charged with "ritual
murder," that is, murder for purposes of paganistic black magic, charges
always vehemently denied. Such denials are understandable, when one considers
how loathsome such practices are.
The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia relates: "It may be positively asserted
that there is no Jewish ritual which prescribes the use of blood of any
human being. Were there such a ritual...there would certainly be some reference
to it in the colossal mass of halakic literature [Halakic means legal]..."
This is an evasion, because no one has accused Judaism of carrying all
the bloody business of its demonism in the "halachah" or "legal" literature.
Demonism belongs in the "Practical Cabala," the "theurgic" or wonder- working
literature, the manuscripts for which are copied hand to hand. Occasionally
one is printed in occult works. Blood, blood, blood is through it all.
One of the many charges of ritual murder was in Russia, in 1912, when
Mendel Beilis was accused of this crime of murdering for the purposes of
black magic. The American Jewish Committee succeeded in interesting journalists
to such an extent "that the country was convinced of the infamous character
of the charge." Christian ministers in the United States were induced to
send protests to Russia. These "Christian divines" whom the Committee inspired
to protest to Russia "disavowed their belief in the atrocious charge."
(Communal Register, International Organizations, p. 1417)
The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia elaborately denies the "Blood Accusation,"
but states: "Of the alarmingly large number of ritual trials only a few
of the more important and instructive can here be mentioned." One hundred
twenty-two are covered. Thirty-nine of these in one row bear dates in the
19th Century. These trials took place from Rumania, Prussia, Bohemia and
Germany through to Russia, England and France.
Is it not strange that so many court trials have been held for so many
centuries in so many different countries without any foundation whatever
except some groundless prejudice? A reading of the section on "Superstition"
in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia will give a glimpse of occult practices
of Judaism continuing today, foul practices such as "to fig," Kapporah,
and the like. Rabbi Joshua Trachtenberg is cited as an authority as to
his Jewish Magic and Superstition (Behrman's Jewish Book House, Publishers,
In it he seeks to erase the Ritual Murder charges of the centuries,
referring to "the constant recurrence of child sacrifice in these trials
and the importance of human blood in the witches' ritual...the most distinguishing
elements in the technique of the sorcerer and the witch, as disclosed to
popular view by the campaign of the Church." (Jewish Magic and Superstition,
Behrmann's, N.Y., 1939, p. 9)
It is interesting to note that these occult practices are current. The
late Dr. Dekker was at one time in the Communist movement, and told of
being a member of the same occult group with Communist Party Chief Earl
Browder, for the purpose of "influencing individuals."
The publication Ritual Magic is a good complement to Trachtenberg's
Jewish Magic and Superstition and is a documented book which contains much
material and some bloody manuscripts. It was authored by Professor E.M.
Butler of Cambridge University (published by the University Press, 1949)
The vast scholarship, the documentation on this subject, are presented
in a light hearted style not unmixed with awareness of the perils and the
ghastly viciousness of the occult "arts" which translations of museum manuscripts
must convey to any sane reader.
So reference is made in the Butler book to a branch of this demon magic
as belonging to an earlier age: "to the world of the Akkadian- Chaldean
'Babylonian' inscriptions and of the Graeco-Egyptian papyri animated by
the belief that the gods could and would support the magician in his dealings
with the demons, if properly invoked; and that by the use of certain mysterious
and ineffable names as well as other spells, they could be forced to do
so even against their will. From the earliest times this extraordinary
power was recognized as prone to abuse in the hands of 'black' magicians,
but the Art itself was not only respectable, it was a high and holy one.
Christianity altered all that, anathematizing magic..."
LaCroix on Moloch
As to the same rites, LaCroix states: "Moloch was represented under
the figure of a man with the head of a calif...erected upon an immense
oven, which was lighted to consume at once the seven kinds of offerings.
During this holocaust, the priests of Moloch kept up a terrible music,
with sistrums and tambours, in order to stifle the cries of the victims.
Then took place that infamy cursed by the God of Israel: the Molochites
abandoned themselves to practices worthy of the land of Onan [masturbation]
and, inspired by the rhythmic sound of the musical instruments, writhed
about the incandescent statue, which appeared red thorough the smoke: and
they gave forth frenzied cries as, in accordance with the Biblical expression,
they gave their seed [children] to Moloch." (History of Prostitution, Paul
LaCroix, French author and historian: 1806-84)
History - Part 22
Judaism Permits (Christian) Child
Sacrifices to Moloch
The whole Bible is full of and condemns the bloody business of pagan
demonology, including Baal worship with its self-cutting with knives and
Moloch worship with child sacrifice. Both are condoned or permitted by
the modern Jewish Babylonian Talmud. Every form of ancient paganism decried
by the Bible may be found under the "whited sepulchre" of so-called "Judaism,"
which is actually Pharisee paganism. "Christians," now, as formerly, would
do well to read up on what the Bible condemns, and find those pagan murder
practices have not disappeared from the Earth, nor from the "synagogue
Burning children to the demon Moloch is permitted today by the supreme
legal authority of the so-called "Jewish" religion, which is the Babylonian
Talmud, and, in particular, the Talmud book of Sanhedrin, Folios 64a-64b.
Remember, the book of Sanhedrin is, according to its Introduction in the
Soncino English translation of 1935, the "chief repository of the criminal
law of the Talmud."
To justify child sacrifices to Moloch, the Talmud once again cites Scripture,
which clearly condemns such pagan practice, and then reverses the clear
meaning of the Scripture with hairsplitting "exceptions" to justify these
sacrifices. (Talmud, Sanhedrin 64a-64b) Thus, as Christ put it to the Pharisees,
you make the "commandment of God of non effect. Ye hypocrites! Well did
Esaias [Isaiah] prophecy of you, saying, This people draw nigh unto me
with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is
far from me. But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the
commandments of men." (Matthew 15:7) Christ also refereed to Isaiah 29:13.
Isaiah well knew the breed of Satanists who used the Bible to destroy it.
The "Mishna" of the Sanhedrin sets out to make the clear orders of Moses
against burning or causing to be burned any child to Moloch by:
1) handing the child to Moloch, and
But, note the "explanation" to the Talmudic Mishna, which states: "He who
gives of his seed [children] to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers
it to Moloch" (1) "and causes it to pass through the fire" (2) "If he gave
it to Moloch but he did not cause it [the child] to pass through the fire,
or the reverse" (i.e. cause his child to pass through the fire, but did
not give it to Moloch) "he incurs no penalty unless he does both." At this
point, does it really matter whether an innocent child has been burned
in fire and also "given to Moloch" when its murder by fire is condoned
if the latter proviso is excluded?
2) causing the child to be burned.
In a footnote to the same Talmud "Mishna" reference it is explained:
"(5) As two separate offenses, proving that giving one's seed [child] to
Moloch is not idolatry." What foul idolatry! The same Talmud section subverts
the Mishna exception "unless he gives it to Moloch" further to: "punishment
is not incurred unless he delivers his seed [child] to the acolytes of
Moloch." Thus, if one delivers his own child into the fire, for death,
and to Moloch, there would be "no punishment."
A further "explanatory footnote" says: "He explains this to be the meaning
of the Mishna unless he gives it to Moloch (5). This proves that the offense
consists of two parts; (1) formal delivery to the priests, and (2) causing
the seed to pass through the fire." The same Talmud section includes the
repetitional statement that: "the service of Moloch...is not included in
Note: Reversing the chief idolatrous practice denounced by the Bible!].
In Leviticus 20:2 it is stated: "And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying...Whosoever
he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers [Jews] that sojourn
in Israel that giveth any of his seed [children] to Molech..." Then treatment
of a murderer is demanded: "He shall surely be put to death." As to this
Biblical prohibition, the Talmud is a masterpiece of Satanism stating:
"If one caused all his seed [children] to pass through the fire to Molech,
he is exempt, because it is written, 'of thy seed' implying, but not all
thy seed." In footnote 4 the Biblical citation as authority is given as
the Leviticus reference referred to above.
Thus, THE TALMUD "NULLIFIES" THE WORD OF GOD, REVERSING IT WHILE GIVING
IT AS AUTHORITY, TO PERMIT MURDERING ONE'S CHILD IN THE SERVICE OF MOLECH!
This cannot be from ignorance of God's Word, clearly cited, and is nothing
but SHEER BLASPHEMY.
Jews Not A Race
"I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews [Judeans] and
are not, but are the synagogue of Satan," said Christ from the Spirit to
John, about 96 A.D. (Revelation 2:9; 3:9). At that time true Scripture
believers had accepted Christ and called themselves Christians. The Sadducees
had disappeared, according to the Jewish Encyclopedia, and the Pharisees
were in complete control. Judaism was synonymous with Pharisaism (Jewish
Encyclopedia, p. 666)
The question arises whether the boasts of present day Pharisees "which
say they are Jews [Judeans]" have any genealogical backing. Are the so-called
Jews of today descendants of the patriarch Judah? The Bible is the best
answer to this. And the answer is that THEY ARE NOT! There was barely enough
record in Christ's time to identify Him and a few of His followers, as
descendants of a certain Israel tribe. Paul was a Benjaminite, for example.
Whether or not they were lineal descendants of the patriarch Judah,
a sinner, was not the issue. They had had access to the Word of God, and
instead, adopted a pagan tradition which nullified, as Christ said, the
commandments of God (Matthew 15:3-9; Mark 7:5-9).
Christ said: "Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may
keep your own tradition." Faith in God and His Word was the test.
As Paul said: "For he is not a Jew [Judean], which is one outwardly...But
he is a Jew [Judean], which is one inwardly...in the spirit...whose praise
is not of men, but of god." (Romans 2:28-29)
Again, Paul makes it clear that the promise of blessing through Abraham
was Christ. "Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made, He saith
not...seeds of many, but as of one ...which is Christ...There is neither
Jew [Judean] nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither
male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's
then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise." (Galatians
The Prophet Isaiah was a prophet indeed when, after recounting the abominable
practices of the Jews when he foretold: "And ye shall leave your name for
a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord God shall slay thee, and call his
servants by another name." (Isaiah 65:15) This was shortly after his Godly
prophecy that Christ would be born from the line of Judah. "Thus saith
the Lord...I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob, and one of Judah an
inheritor of my mountains and mine elect shall inherit it...but ye are
they that forsake the Lord..." (Isaiah 65:9-10)
Christ Born of Judah
It is as anti-Biblical to enthrone the abomination serving Pharisees
[Jews] of today as it is to deny that Christ was born, as foretold, through
Judah. Otherwise, He has not yet come. To Abraham, to Isaac, his son, to
Jacob/Israel, his grandson, to David, of the same line, was a special revelation
made that the Christ would be their descendant, according to the flesh.
That line identified Him when He came. It did not furnish His Divinity.
As Paul said: "It is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah." (Hebrews
7:14) The patriarch Jacob/Israel, about 1700 B.C., had foretold that He
would be. On his deathbed, he likened the coming Christ to Shiloh, where
rested the tabernacle of God. Jacob said: "The septre shall not depart
from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and
unto him shall the gathering of the people be." (Genesis 49:10) And the
semblance of a Judah kingdom in Palestine did not disappear until after
Christ was born there.
Jews Not "Semites"
According to the current Jewish-American press, about half of the Jews
in Israel today are Negroes and dark- skinned Orientals. A constant tug
of war goes on, with continuous charges of "discrimination" raised by Oriental
and Negro Jews against the Western Jews. The true facts thoroughly disprove
any pretensions that today's so-called Jews are genealogically "descendants
of the prophets," or a "race" of any kind.
Shem, Ham and Japeth were the three race-founding sons of Noah. To be
a Semite one must have descended from Shem, just as to be a Jew, genealogically,
one must descend from Judah. Ham was the father of the abominating Canaan
who mistreated Noah sexually (Gen. 9:25), and Canaan's descendants who
peopled the Land of Canaan had the same proclivities. Thus, Moses, in leading
the Israelites back from Egypt in 1491 B.C., warned them to make no marriages,
no alliances with the Canaanites, or they might lose their faith and decency.
And what is the Biblical record? Moses died in 1451 B.C., and Joshua
actually led the Israelites into Canaan, or Palestine. They had been told
in no uncertain terms that they could choose between life and death, blessing
and cursing: "A blessing if ye obey the commandments of the Lord your God...And
a curse if ye will not." (Deuteronomy 11:26-8; 30:19-20).
The Israelites were to drive out the Canaanite abominators, and make
no marriages or deals with them. The sons of the cursed Canaan fathered
the Jebusites, Amorites, Girgasites, Hivites, Arkites, Sinites, Arvadites,
Zemarites and Hamathites, according to Genesis 10:15-18 and 1 Chronicles
1:13-16. However, a reading of the books of Joshua and Judges will show
that instead of driving out these Canaanite tribes, the Israelites mixed
with them all and adopted their abominations. That is why the Prophets
thundered and threatened, and the Northern, ten-tribe Israel Kingdom was
deported by the Assyrians in 721 B.C., and "lost" by being strewn across
their world empire.
Before the foretold slaughter and deportation, with loss forever of
national sovereignty of the Israel kingdom, for black magic pagan crimes,
the Prophet Isaiah said: "His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant,
they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark: sleeping, lying down, loving
to slumber. Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and
they are shepherds that cannot understand; they all look to their own way,
every one for his gain, from his quarter." (Isaiah 56:10-11) Thus he prophesied
760-698 B.C., and, in 721 B.C., the Israel kingdom was slaughtered and
finished, unrepentant, unhearing.
The fulminating by the Prophets continued against the people of the
Judah-Benjamin kingdom around Jerusalem until they too were deported by
the Babylonians in 606-586 B.C. A remnant returned in 536 B.C.
Jews A Non-Racial Pharisee Sect
Present-day Jews are a pot-pourri of every race of man, and they do
not have any genealogical or racial derivation from the ancient peoples
of the Holy Land. Since "Jews" were a mixed race from the beginning, the
term "Semites" applied to them, admittedly, is silly. Thus, "Anti-Semitism,"
actually means "Anti-Pharisaism."
The Chazars (Khazars), for example were, as we have already stated,
were part of an Asiatic horde which adopted Talmudism in the 8th Century,
when their King, Bulan, and his Court did so. Their descendants constituted
the Ashkenaze Jews of Russia, Poland and Germany, who in turn migrated
in large numbers to the United States.
There have been Chinese "Jews" for centuries, also India "Jews," and
Falasha Negro "Jews." The Negro Jews of New York City have asked for money
for a synagogue, claiming that they numbered about 120,000 members, maintain
five synagogues and needed money for more. Marilyn Monroe, Elizabeth Taylor,
Negro Sammy Davis, and many others have been notable additions to the Pharisee
sect of "Chosen People"
Why Do They "Look Jewish?"
A long article, with pictures and charts, in the Jewish Encyclopedia,
under "Types, Anthropological," seeks to answer the question as to why
there is a recognizable "Jewish look" as to so many self-styled "Jews."
Subjects such as percentages of blonde and brunette types, their origins,
skull formations, are discussed.
Then, to quote: "What is popularly known as 'the Jewish eye' is not
a correlation of definite anthropological measures or characteristics,
but consists principally in a peculiar expression of face, which is immediately
and unmistakably recognized as 'Jewish' in a large number of cases...It
has also been remarked that persons who do not have the Jewish expression
in their youth acquire it more and more as they grow from middle to old
Illustrations of how Negroes, as well as Gentile adults and children,
recognize this Jewish look, are related. That the "look" is not racial
is illustrated by "the Little Russians, who apparently resemble their Gentile
neighbors in every facial characteristic, but are differentiated from them
by some subtle nuance which distinguishes them as Semites...It is seemingly
some social quality which stamps their features as distinctly Jewish."
The Anti-Defamation League of B'bnai B'rith has issued a series leaflets
for Fireside Discussion Groups, Number 7 is entitled: "Three Questions
Jews Must Answer."
The question "Are Jews a Race?" is answered, briefly, with the conclusion
that Jews are part of a "general admixture" of races.
"Are Jews a nation?" is answered with the idea that Jews form parts
of all nations; that some of them have the Zionist ideal of a Palestinian
nation but "Jews have a consciousness of world unity." To quote: Jews are
"definitely a type, and consciously a unity, we are an historic people
-- a world community."
The question "Are Jews a Religion?" is answered by the assertion that
"There are hundreds of thousands of Jews who are unbelievers. Yet they
still consider themselves Jews." The incident of Jews converted to Christianity
[In my opinion -- there are about the same number of Christian Jews as
there are Virgin Prostitutes!] asking to help build a Jewish Palestine
is related, "It is true that there are hundreds of thousands of atheist
Jews, but they need not fear to be represented by Judaism. Of this they
may be sure; that Judaism will not misrepresent them."
This is a good place to stop and agree on that point. As noted more
fully elsewhere, aside from the "whited sepulchre" which constitutes the
showmanship and trimmings of so-called "Judaism," its basic doctrine is
that God is the "En Sof," a nature essence which has no attributes and
can neither know nor be known. That is atheism and the basis of all pagan
pantheism. Communism merely calls the same concept "dialectical materialism."
The article ends: "In a race-mad world, we will not be one more race.
In a world destroyed by nationalism, we will not add one more nationalistic
fury. But in a world in which religion is trying to re-establish brotherhood,
we...[are] the creators and bearers of one of the eternal faiths of the
human race." But Pharisaism is not an "eternal" faith of the "human" race
and, in truth, teaches as a basic law that only Pharisees are "men" or
humans (Jewish Encyclopedia, under Gentiles, Vol. V, p. 619).
History - Part 23
That "the synagogue of Satan," as Christ called Pharisaism (Revelation
2:9; 3:9) is "eternal," is denied by the whole Bible. The B'nai B'rith
pamphlet previously quoted also states: "We want a world in which nationalism
shall definitely diminish." And, Jews feel they belong to one world
unity. When the Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492, the Jewry of northern
Africa received them. When the Jews were expelled from Germany during the
crusades, the Jewry of Poland received them.
When they were expelled from Poland in 1648, the reconstituted German
community received them in turn; and when Eastern Europe sent its Jewish...exiles
across the world, American Jewry helped them find a home, they have always
welcomed their own exiles...We are the children of...a great and noble
tradition. We were united by that tradition.
America Has A Talmudic Government
It is becoming ever more evident that the government of the United States,
as well as our people, have become more and more Talmudic in concept and
action. These statements seem so foreign to a nation whose roots were founded
in Christianity. Many will, no doubt, ask what is meant by a Talmudic Government.
So we present the following explanation for the growth of Talmudism in
the United States.
As Solomon said in the Book of Ecclesiastes: "The thing that hath been,
it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be
done: and there is no new thing under the sun." (Eccl. 1:9).
The concept of a Talmudic government has all been done many times in
the past. The principles written in the Word of God are inviolate and we
cannot escape them. What was Jesus talking about in Matthew 23:13 when
He said: "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut
up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves,
neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."
What did He mean by "kingdom of heaven?" It is that system of government
here on earth that God has given us to follow. If we have a system of government
that follows His precepts, we are blessed. If we deny His concepts we are
cursed. It's that simple. Deuteronomy 28 tells it all. Jesus said that
the Pharisees were making the commandments of God of non effect by the
traditions of men.
In the book, The Wisdom of the Talmud by Rabbi ben Zion Bokser we read,
"Prior to the destruction of the Temple in 70 C.E. (A.D.) the state was
intermittently under the influence of the Pharisees, the forerunners of
the rabbis who were the great builders of Talmudic law...Talmudic law came
into its own after the destruction of the Temple. In the limited autonomy
enjoyed by the Jewish community in Palestine and Babylonia, Jewish law
was given far-reaching scope; and that law was the law as interpreted and
administered by the rabbis."
Rabbi Bokser should have included the Roman Empire along with Palestine
and Babylonia. In the very comprehensively-written book, The Jews in Roman
Imperial Legislation by Ammon Linder, we find unequivocal evidence that
the laws of the Roman Empire were materially influenced by the Talmudic
concepts of law. (The Jews in Roman Imperial Legislation, by Amnon Linder)
Thus we see something in common with each of these empires. They all fell
ignominiously into ruin, never to return to the greatness they once had,
because of the Talmudic influence. Has the Christian West fallen from its
zenith of power and respect? Will it have been for the same reason, that
of "making the Word of God of none effect?"
Oswald Spendler wrote in The Decline of the West: "I see in you all
the characteristic stigma of decay. I can prove that your great wealth
and your great poverty, your capitalism and your socialism, your wars and
your revolutions, your atheism and your pessimism and your cynicism, your
immorality, your broken-down marriages, your birth control, that is bleeding
you from the bottom and killing you off at the top in your brains-can prove
to you that these are characteristic marks of the dying ages of ancient
states Alexandria, Greece and neurotic Rome."
What is it that causes once great an fruitful empires to fall? Isn't
it when men and their rulers begin to believe that they can modify the
Laws of God to conform to their own extenuating circumstances? Isn't it
nothing but a repeat of the principle that we learned from Genesis 3 when
Eve took from the tree of knowledge and thought she could discern for herself
what was good and evil?
The Talmud is a huge comprehensive compilation of ideas and thoughts
on the Divine Laws of God and how they can be modified to conform to the
extenuating circumstances as required. Any nation that modifies or removes
the Laws of God from their plan of government and replaces them with any
or all of the concepts of the Talmud is destined to fall.
However, the Talmudists have always survived the fall of the nation
and civilization because it is a government in itself; a government within
a government and a government above a government. The government and the
nation that the Talmud has influenced will fall but the Talmud itself remains
intact. It was developed over a span of many years with the thought of
survival for its people. In other words, the Jews are the greatest collection
of traitors the world has ever know; they are not faitful, even to their
Returning to The Wisdom of the Talmud by Rabbi Bokser we will read of
the modifiers that change the black and white of the Laws of God to the
grey areas that destroy a nation. "The pressure of a higher moral standard
inspired the Talmudic liberalization of the Jewish criminal code. Capital
punishment is provided in the Bible for a variety of crimes. But the rabbis,
as we have already noted, found capital punishment reprehensible, and they
rendered it almost inoperative by hedging it with conditions that made
of the old law a dead letter. Thus they insisted that the commission of
the culpable act must be preceded by a warning and by an expression of
defiance on the part of the criminal in the face of that warning." (Sanhedrin
So here we have the statement for the desire of a "higher moral standard"
on the part of the Pharasees and Talmudists. There is no higher moral standard
than that of God's Word. We may not like to read of the so-called harsh
renderings of justice that God demands but whenever we fail to heed them
we fall as a civilization.
What does God say? "Whoso sheddeth man's blood by man shall his blood
be shed." (Genesis 9:6) "So these things shall be for a statute of judgment
unto you throughout your generations in all your dwellings. Whoso killeth
any person, the murderer shall be put to death." (Numbers 35:29-30)
It is the obligation of Christian government to provide for the execution
of murderers. The officer required to execute the criminal guilty of a
capital crime is exonerated from guilt: "If the revenger of blood (the
executioner) kill the slayer; he shall not be guilty of blood." (Numbers
35:27) These laws pertain to a country in a tranquil state of peace. They
DO NOT pertain to a state of war either within or without the country.
Thus we have the stories of Ehud and Eglon as well as Jael and Sisera.
This is not murder but killing in times of war.
The Laws of God are also specific about kidnaping and rape. These are
death sentences "to remove the evil from among you."
Rabbi Bokser's book states, "Thus Rabbi Eliezer, who was an aristocrat,
exempted arms from the prohibition of carrying unnecessary objects on the
Sabbath. He regarded them as ornaments and they were to be worn as a normal
part of a person's apparel. His colleagues, representing the point of view
of the common people, forbade it. Citing the prophetic contempt for war
and its implements, they branded the wearing of arms as a disgrace." (Mishnah,
In the book of Luke at the time of the last supper, Jesus spoke, "And
he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes,
lacked ye anything? And they said, Nothing. Then said he unto them, But
now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his script: and
he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." (Luke 22:35-36)
Our forefathers, not only here in the United States but in all of the
nations of the Christian West, knew this principle of God very well. They
knew that to conquer a nation it must first be disarmed. The American people
refuse to be disarmed, in open defiance to Senator Metzenbaum's efforts
and others like him who have the Talmudic concept of government.
Welfare A Talmudic Concept
Now, let's look at welfare. The book The Wisdom of the Talmud says,
"The Talmud gives evidence of a continuously growing program of welfare
legislation, in which ever wider sectors of social life were brought under
the control of a law, whose motivating impulse was the welfare of the common
man. Thus the law empowered the community to assume responsibility for
elementary education and poor relief. It authorized the supervision of
weights and measures, and of fair wages and prices to prevent unethical
business practices." (Baba Batra 21a, 8b; Ketubot 49b)
Again, the Word of God says, "And when ye reap the harvest of your land,
thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou
gather the gleanings of thy harvest. And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard,
neither shalt thou gather every grape of thy vineyard; thou shalt leave
them for the poor and the stranger: I am the Lord your God." (Leviticus
"Thou shalt not pervert the judgment of the stranger, nor of the fatherless;
nor take a widow's rainment to pledge...When thou cuttest down thine harvest
in thy field, and hast forgot a sheaf in the field, thou shalt not go again
to fetch it: it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for
the widow: that the Lord thy god may bless thee in all the work of thine
hands. When thou beatest thine olive tree, thou shalt not go over the boughs
again: it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow.
When thou gatherest the grapes of thy vineyard, thou shalt not glean it
afterward: it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the
widow." (Deuteronomy 24:17-21)
"And the Lord spake unto Aaron, saying...And that ye may teach the children
of Israel all the statutes which the Lord hath spoken unto them by the
hand of Moses." (Leviticus 10:11)
In the past, the Christian church has always taken care of its own poor
and provided for the welfare of the people. The body of Christ has always
provided for the education of our children. From the earliest days in America,
the teaching of the children was from books such as McGuffey's Reader and
the Holy Bible. It is even now said among our people that the best way
to teach a child to read, is to teach him to read the Bible. It is a gift
It is demeaning and humiliating to force our poor to stand in line at
the government welfare office to receive their sustenance. The system germinates
fraud and theft by otherwise able bodied people. It creates a system of
perpetual poor whose sole ambition is to have children who will likewise
have the "profession" of being on welfare.
It causes distrust, disgust and anger among the average citizen who,
living in a modest home, has to pay the taxes that builds the expensive,
highly modern, public housing which is far better than their own home.
Only to be torn apart by ungrateful blacks and other so-called minority
Creator of The Law
Again from Rabbi Bokser's book The Wisdom of the Talmud we read the
following which says it all, "The judge served in effect as a CREATOR of
law and not only as its interpreter - a phenomenon which has been duplicated
in every system of jurisprudence."
As our once great Christian Republic fell deeper and deeper under the
spell of the Talmudic concept of law, we see the statement by Bokser that
"The judge served in effect as a creator of law and not only as its interpreter..."
becoming more and more the situation in America. The "separation of powers"
concept within our system has been totally destroyed because of this Talmudic
principle. A great share of our Legislators are also lawyers.
They belong to the American Bar Association and they are members of
the bar. That makes them automatically a part of the Judicial Branch of
government. They know that one day they will return to being a lawyer and
they will serve under a judge. Thus, every law they enact, they think of
in terms of the Judicial Branch and whether the judge will accept it or
not. Making the judge, not only the interpreter of the law, but also its
In Bokser's chapter titled Social Welfare and Personal Freedom we read
of a Talmudic concept that has caused revolutions and insurrections among
our Christian forefathers for centuries. "The social process frequently
brings individuals into a position where they exercise power over the lives
of others. In the social theory of Talmudic Judaism, it then becomes the
task of the community to develop such instruments of social control as
will rationalize that power with moderation and justice.
The Talmudists declared individual property rights as subject to their
consistency with the public welfare. When it is to serve the public interest,
these rights may be modified or suspended altogether. Basing its action
on this principle, Talmudic legislation regulated wages and hours of labor,
commodity prices and rates of profit. They held it was similarly the task
of the community to provide other facilities for promoting the public welfare,
such as public baths, competent medical services, and adequate educational
facilities for all, at least on an elementary level." (Jebamot 89b; Baba
Batra 8b; Sanhedrin 17b)
When and where in the history of our people did this Talmudic principle
cause an insurrection that has been the shining example of our continuing
fight for individual freedom and liberty? To find the answer, we must go
back to England in the time of King William, the Conqueror. William was
the last of the Norsemen from the area of Normandy, France. This part of
France had been conquered and settled by the Norse people (Scandinavian)
many year before.
History - Part 24
Writing about William, "The very spirit of the sea-wolves who had so
long lived on the pillage of the world seemed embodied in his gigantic
form, his enormous strength, his savage countenance, his desperate bravery,
the fury of his wrath, the ruthlessness of his revenge." (A Short History
of the English People, by J.R. Green) This was the disposition of the man
who conquered England and modified the old Saxon laws and customs. The
entire system of civilization in England was modified, some changes for
the better, some for the worse. But in general, as we shall see, the changes
were toward the Talmudic concept of government.
As the conquering King of England, he needed money, lots of it. He immediately
introduced the feudal system to Saxon England. In the feudal system, the
common man owned property only to the extent that he paid his "taxes" to
the local baron or ruler. The local feudal lord then paid his taxes to
the king. The feudal barons and lords were William's chosen men from France,
From Green's Short History of the English People, we read: "But the
greatest safeguard of the Crown lay in the wealth and personal power of
the kings. Extensive as had been his grants to noble and soldier, William
remained the greatest land-owner in his realm. His rigid exaction of feudal
dues added wealth to the great Hoard at Winchester, which had been begun
by the spoil of the conquered. But William found a more ready source of
revenue in the settlement of the Jewish traders, who followed him from
Normandy, and who were enabled by the royal protection to establish themselves
in separate quarters or 'Jewries' of the chief towns of England.
The Jew had no right or citizenship in the land; the Jewry in which
he lived was, like the King's forest, exempt from the common law. He was
simply the King's chattel, and his life and goods were absolutely at the
King's mercy. But he was too valuable a possession to be lightly thrown
A royal judiciary secured law to the Jewish merchant, who had not standing-ground
in the local courts; his bonds were deposited for safety in a chamber of
the royal palace at Westminster, which from their Hebrew name of 'starrs'
gained the title of the Star-Chamber; he was protected against the popular
hatred in the free exercise of his religion, and allowed to erect synagogues
and to direct his own ecclesiastical affairs by means of a chief rabbi.
No measures could have been more beneficial (sic) to the kingdom at
large. The Jew was the only capitalist in Europe, and, heavy as was the
usury he exacted, his loans gave an impulse to industry such as England
had never felt before. The century which followed the Conquest witnessed
an outburst of architectural energy which covered the land with castles
and cathedrals; but castle and cathedral alike owed their existence to
the loans of the Jew...To the kings (William and the Norman kings that
followed) the Jew was simply an engine of finance.
The wealth which his industry accumulated was wrung from him whenever
the King had need, and torture and imprisonment were resorted to if milder
entreaties failed. It was the wealth of the Jew that filled the royal exchequer
at the outbreak of war or of revolt. It was in the Hebrew (sic) coffers
that the Norman kings found strength to hold their baronage at bay."
It is as obvious as night follows day that these money lenders, just
as the banks of today do, gave advice to the kings. Obviously that advice
will have been according to their own mores and customs. "The golden rule,
he who has the gold makes the rules." Thus, the Talmudic concept that rabbi
Bokser revealed in his book The Wisdom of the Talmud became the civilization
of the land starting at the time of the Norman kings in England. To emphasize
this point, we repeat, "The Talmudists declared individual property rights
as subject to their consistency with the public welfare. When it is to
serve the public interest, these rights may be modified or suspended altogether...The
century which followed the Conquest witnessed an outburst of architectural
energy which covered the land with castles and cathedrals; but castle and
cathedral alike owed their existence to the loans of the Jews."
Public structures were built everywhere and their construction was of
the most expensive type possible. Bridges were made of permanent stone,
as well as other government buildings. The more expensive the building
the more money that would be loaned at usury. But as Green in his book
points out, "He was simply the King's chattel, and his life and goods were
absolutely at the King's mercy."
Another action that these Norman kings took was to confiscate the Jew's
property at the time of his death. But that action didn't make any difference
to the Jews. Because of the tremendous wealth to be made from usury, their
children could create their own wealth in a very short time.
If their children were started in the business while the parent was
still alive, the usury system could be handed down without an inheritance
problem. Thus we see another Talmudic principle, that of disallowing inheritance.
We see that today in the Communist Manifesto along with all of the modern
Control The Key Word
The key word to the system is not ownership but control. The Jews, because
of the instinct for survival, created the economic system in which they
didn't need to own anything that would be taken from them at the time of
their death. A system was developed that perpetuated the control of material
wealth and not the direct ownership. Thus, the laws of incorporation were
the result of the system that was started as a means of survival.
The same can be said of the idea of the graduated income tax. The Norman
kings extracted from these money lenders the capital they needed in direct
proportion to the wealth of the money lender. The richer he was, the more
money taken from him. The graduated income tax is also a Communist Manifesto
Confiscation of Private Property
Another Talmudic concept that started in the days of the Norman kings
was that of confiscation of private property for the king's (or government's)
use. King William confiscated a tremendous amount of private property for
the government's use in what was called Carte de Foresta, or Forest Laws.
"The king having a continual care for the preservation of the realm, and
for the peace and quiet of his subjects, he had therefore amongst many
privileges this prerogative, to have his place of recreation whomsoever
he would appoint." (Today confiscation is taking place on a daily basis
in the name of the "War On Drugs." It is nothing but government theft,
enforced by the gun)
Thus, "for the preservation of the realm," we have the laws of Eminent
Domain, which is the power of a government over all the property within
its limits, by which it is entitled to appropriate, or to authorize the
appropriation of, private property for public use, giving just (sic) compensation
to the owner. We also have, as a part, of this concept of Carta de Foresta,
the current mania of creating vast, "wilderness" tracts that will eventually
be used as collateral for the public debt. This, is a part of what is called
- "The World Conservation Bank." Private property is being confiscated
at an alarming rate in the United States.
Capital Punishment Laws
Another Talmudic concept that King William initiated was that of dissolving
the Capital Punishment Laws. Even though he would kill a man without batting
an eye, so to speak, he did not believe in shedding blood by process of
law. Thus, he initiated the concept of no capital punishment because of
a "higher moral standard." The Norman kings continued to rule through four
generations until the time of King John. The strong and authoritarian concept
of government started by King William the Conqueror became more demanding
for the English people. The concept of government spending using borrowed
money was the accepted way. Capitalization of private enterprises using
borrowed money at usury resulted in what appeared on the surface a better
way of life for the English people.
But the people were losing their cherished freedoms and liberty. Vast
tracts of private property were confiscated by the government to be converted
into forests and other uses for the "common good." The churches were told
to stay out of government business.
But it was in keeping with true Biblical principles that a change took
place in England that proved that there was a law which is above the King
and which even he must not break. The reaffirmation of the Supreme Law
of inalienable rights for the common man is the great work of the Magna
It was once again a man of God who brought about the confrontation between
the barons and King John on an island in a marsh called Runneymede. The
English church leader Anselm had earlier withstood William the Red, the
son of William the Conqueror. The church leader Theobald rescued England
from the lawlessness of Stephen, the grandson of William the Conqueror.
And now it was Stephen Langton, the new archbishop of Canterbury who stood
before the vicious King John. It was his intention to restore on a formal
basis the older Saxon freedoms of the realm.
For several months the nobles and the churchmen stood together against
John. The several larger cities of England saw the churchmen and barons
enter their cities and claim freedom and liberty. In London, the barons
were organized under Robert Fitz-Walter, "the marshal of the army of God
and holy church." It was the Talmudic principles of government that the
Magna Carta addressed and it was the Christian church which showed the
barons what needed to be done at Runnymede. (A Short History of the English
People, J.R. Green)
As a second witness to the analysis of history that has been described
and to the understanding of what happens when a nation follows the Talmudic
concept of government, the following is extracted from the book simply
titled The Jews by the very well known author, Hilaire Belloc: "The Jewish
element in this island (England), whatever it may have been during the
Roman occupation, was of small account during the Dark Ages. Things changed
at their close in the eleventh century.
The Jew is the camp follower of each new economic movement among us
and that is why one finds him in the wake of the Norman Conquest. Throughout
the economic development which it began appears the secondary role of the
Jew. Every one knows the mediaeval rule of Jewish Status. It was established
here as everywhere else in Christendom.
The Jew was the King's; that is, under the special protection of the
State. If he were the subject of popular attack, that attack was an attack
on the King's peculiar, and liable to speedy repression. The individual
attacker was punished with special severity because the danger of mass-movement
is always great where the populace is free to act in masses as it was throughout
the middle ages, and the necessity for preventing individual attacks from
spreading was correspondingly great. Now and then the popular feeling got
out of hand and the monarch had to deal with numbers which he could not
control; but as a rule the Jews, especially the rich Jew, enjoyed a privileged
position, both in Northern France and throughout England. The Jew of the
early Middle Ages in England was normally a well-to-do man and often an
exceedingly rich man. Then, as now, a small number of Jews were the richest
men of their time. He had mot of the finances in his hands, and this immense
privilege (which he has lost), that he alone was allowed to practice usury.
Here we must pause a moment to define usury."
"Usury then (as now) signified the receiving of interest upon unproductive
loans. It is a practice which all moralists and all philosophers have condemned
and which the Church in particular condemns. If you lend money to a man
for a productive purpose: if, for instance, he is to buy a ship and trade
with the money you advance, or to buy a farm and grow produce, then, of
course, you are perfectly free to stipulate for a portion of the profit.
But if you lend the money for a purpose not directly productive, as,
for instance, to a man in grave necessity, or in lieu of charity, or to
build such a building as a church, which will not produce a rent, or if
in any other fashion you lend money to one who (to your knowledge) will
not spend it in some reproductive agency, then it is immoral to demand
interest. Now an exception was made in mediaeval Christendom in favor of
the Jew. He was allowed to lend money at interest, even in the most grievous
cases of necessity, and for services as unproductive as religion and war.
The only stipulation was that the moneys saved from this lucrative practice
returned to the Crown (in theory) upon the death of the licensee. In practice
no doubt a very large part remained with the accumulator, who during his
lifetime was enjoying the income he had acquired by usury, who could give
it to his heirs while still living, and could use opportunities for secret
investment, or pass it to the custody of others throughout international
Jewry. But liquid sums left by him, the product of his usury, returned
to the Crown upon his death. This was a great advantage to the Crown, not
only in protecting the Jew from the native hostility of his alien hosts
(and particularly of the populace), but in giving him that great privilege-a
The rate of interest was enormous. It varied from nearly 50 percent
to over 80 percent. When Jews lent money on security the King was party
to the safe custody of the security, and their privilege extended so far
that they were exempt from the common law, and a case between an Englishman
and his Jewish creditor could only be tried by a mixed jury in which the
Jew's own compatriots were present in equal numbers with the English. All
during the Angevin period Jewish financial domination continued, up to
the end of the twelfth century and even into the beginning of the thirteenth.
But with the first half of the thirteenth century, for some reason of which
I have never seen a sufficient historical analysis and of which, perhaps,
the full causes have been lost, the Jewish power began to decline very
rapidly, so far as England was concerned.
The Angevin period was when the French kings from the area of France
called Anjou ruled over England. It is considered to be from 1154 A.D.
to 1399 A.D. Of course, William the Conqueror was the first French King
to rule England after he conquered the country. They were also known as
the Plantegenet kings). And here it may be noted that the misfortunes of
the Jews in any country never begin until their financial position is shaken.
As long as they are the financial masters of the Government they are protected;
but woe to them when they begin to lose their financial power! Then there
is no longer any reason for supporting them either on the part of the governing
classes in general or of the Executive in particular. Popular passion is
let loose and disaster follows.
At any rate, the thirteenth century saw in England a rapid decline of
Jewish financial power and at the same time a rapid rise of official animosity
towards them. They got poorer and poorer as the century proceeded. Their
activities were at the same time more and more restricted. They had lent
money largely upon land and yet, in the public interest, were at last forbidden
to foreclose upon it. The final step came when their special license to
practice usury was withdrawn by Edward I in the earlier part of his reign;
and at last, in 1290, after increasing severities, they were all expelled
from the country under penalty of death." (The end of the extraction from
Hilaire Belloc's book).
Notice that Mr. Belloc did not fully understand why the power of the
mone lenders declined in the first half of the thirteenth century. The
reason is apparent when you associate not only the lending of money at
usury but also the Talmudic concept of government with the conditions of
the counry at the time. Mr. Belloc hints at this association but still
does not fully grasp the significance when he writes this in the introduction
to his third edition of the book, The Jews: "The positive side of Jewish
Communism as expressed by Mordecai himself (Marx) and by all the other
exponents of it, Jew and Gentile, is their insistence on the control of
the means of production, distribution and exchange, by officials of the
community which turn out in practice to be in large proportion Jews." (The
Jews, Hilaire Belloc)