History -Part 25
It was the Magna Carta that was forced upon King John at Runneymede
and caused the power of the Jews to wane and caused their eventual expulsion
from the country.
1) Now we can understand why the Federal Reserve system has never been
audited, let alone expelled from our country.
2) Now we can understand why we still have "star-chamber" courts where
white collar crime is swept under the rug.
3) Now we can understand why billions of dollars can be stolen from
the savings and loans associations, banks and other lending associations.
4) Now we can understand why the American taxpayers end up paying for
5) Now we can understand why we can have insider trader frauds and the
Americans who invested in those companies are losing their life's savings
to Jewish Wall Street manipulators. Who are required to pay fines, to the
government, and not to the men and women who lost those savings. Is that
justice? I think not!
"John, by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of
Normandy, Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots,
Earls, Barons, Justiciaries, Foresters...and his faithful subjects, greeting.
Know ye, that we, in the presence of God, and for the salvation of our
soul, and the souls of all our ancestors and heirs, and unto the honor
of God and the advancement of Holy Church, and amendment of our Realm...have,
in the first place, granted to God, and by this our present Charter confirmed,
for us and our heirs for ever:
'That the Church of England shall be free, and have her whole rights,
and her liberties...We also have granted to all the freemen of our kingdom
for us and our heirs for ever, all the underwritten liberties to be hand
and holden by them and their heirs, of us and our heirs for ever...No scutage
or aid shall be imposed in our kingdom, unless by the general council of
our kingdom; except for ransoming our person, making our eldest son a knight,
and once for marrying our eldest daughter; and for these there shall be
paid no more than a reasonable aid. In like manner it shall be concerning
the aids of the City of London.
And the City of London shall have its ancient liberties and free customs,
as well by land as by water: furthermore, we will and grant that all other
cities and boroughs, and towns and ports, shall have all their liberties
and free customs. And for holding the general council of the kingdom concerning
the assessment of aids, except in the three cases aforesaid, and for the
assessing of scutages we shall cause to be summoned the archbishops, bishops,
abbots, earls, and greater barons of the realm, singly by our letters.
And furthermore, we shall cause to be summoned generally, by our sheriffs
and bailiffs, all others who hold us in chief, for a certain day. That
is to say, forty days before their meeting at least, and to a certain place;
and in all letters of such summons we will declare the cause of such summons.
And summons being thus made, the business shall proceed on the day appointed,
according to the advice of
such as shall be present, although all that were summoned came not...
A freeman shall not be amerced for a small offense, but only according
to the degree of the offense; and for a great crime according to the heinousness
of it, saving to him his contentment; and after the same manner a merchant,
saving to him his merchandise. And a villain shall be amerced after the
same manner, saving to him his wainage, if he falls under our mercy; and
none of the aforesaid americaments shall be assessed but by the oath of
honest men in the neighborhood.
Earls and barons shall not be amerced but by their peers, after the
degree of the offense...No constable or bailiff of ours shall take corn
or other chattels of any man unless he presently give him money for it,
or hath respite of payment by the good-will of the seller.
No constable shall distrain any knight to give money for castle-guard,
if he himself will do it in his person, or by another able man, in case
he cannot do it through any reasonable cause...No sheriff or bailiff of
ours, or any other, shall take horses or carts of any freeman for carriage,
without the assent of the said freeman.
Neither shall we nor our bailiffs take any man's timber for our castles
or other uses, unless by the consent of the owner of the timber...If one
who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, die before that
loan be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest while the heir is under
age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt falls into our hands, we
will not take anything except the principal sum contained in the bond.
And if anyone die, indebted to the Jews, his wife shall have her dower
and pay nothing of that debt; and if any children of the deceased are left
under age, necessaries shall be provided for them in keeping with holding
of the deceased; and out of the residue the debt shall be paid, reserving,
however, service due to feudal lords; in like manner let it be done touching
debts due to others than Jews.
Nothing from henceforth shall be given or taken for a writ of inquisition
of life or limb, but it shall be grated freely, and not denied...No freeman
shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or banished, or
any ways destroyed, nor will we pass upon him, nor will we send upon him,
unless by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land.
We will sell to no man, we will not deny to any man, either justice or
If any one has been dispossessed or deprived by us, without the lawful
judgment of his peers, of his lands, castles, liberties, or right, we will
forthwith restore them to him; and if any dispute arise upon his head,
let the matter be decided by the five-and-twenty barons hereafter mentioned,
for the preservation of the peace...All unjust and illegal fines made by
us, and all americaments imposed unjustly and contrary to the law of the
land, shall be entirely given up, or else be left to the decision of the
five-and-twenty barons hereafter mentioned for the preservation of the
peace, or of the major part of the, together with the aforesaid Stephen,
Archbishop of Canterbury, if he can be present, and others whom we shall
think fit to invite...All the aforesaid customs and liberties, which we
have grated to be holden in our kingdom, as much as it belongs to us, all
people in our kingdom, as well clergy as laity, shall observe, as far as
they are concerned, towards their dependents.
And whereas, for the honor of God and the amendment of our kingdom,
and for the better quieting the discord that has arisen between us and
our barons, we have granted all these things aforesaid; willing to render
them firm and lasting, we do give and grant our subjects the underwritten
security, namely that the barons may choose five-and-twenty barons of the
kingdom whom they think convenient, and cause to be observed, the peace
and liberties we have granted them, and by this our present Charter confirmed
in this manner...Given under our hand, in the presence of the witnesses
above named, and many others, in the meadow called Runneymede, between
Windsor and Staines, the 15th day of June, in the 17th year of our reign."
This Charter clearly shows the disdain and disgust that our ancestors
had for the Jews, and it was not because of some sort of anti-Semitism;
It was because they are thieves, swindlers, murderers and rifraff.
But the principles of the World of God are always true. Eventually,
the people understand that they are in bondage and they cry unto God. When
the people truly repent for allowing these things to happen, God sends
prophets to teach and then there is always another Gideon.
Winston Churchill made the following statement about the Magna Carta
in his works A History of the English Speaking Peoples: "Now for the first
time the King himself is bound by the law. The root principle was destined
to survive across the generations and rise paramount long after the feudal
background of 1215 had faded in the past. The Charter became in the process
of time an enduring witness that the power of the Crown was not absolute.
The facts embodied in it and the circumstances giving rise to them were
buried or misunderstood. The underlying idea of the sovereignty of law,
long existent in feudal custom, was raised by it into a doctrine for the
national state. And when in subsequent ages the State, swollen with its
own authority, has attempted to ride roughshod over the rights or liberties
of the subject it is to this doctrine that appeal has again and again been
made, and never, as yet, without success." It was many centuries later,
here in America, that an appeal was again made to that doctrine of inalienable
rights because a government was "swollen with its own authority."
And now, near the close of the twentieth century, just two hundred short
years later, another government, led by the International Jewish Bankers,
has become swollen with its own authority and is riding roughshod over
the rights and liberties of its subjects, its citizens. And it is for the
exact same reasons as in the days of the Norman kings that the American
people have become disenchanted with the process of government in our own
At first, the Talmudic system sounds so good. "Two chickens in every
pot and from each according to his ability and to each according to his
needs." We will have day-care centers for our children because this "great"
system has forced nearly every mother to work to help purchase those "two
chickens and the pot."
A. We now have great public works projects to bring the civilization
up to the standards of ancient Rome.
B. We now have judges who MAKE the law instead of simply refereeing
the actions of a trial by jury.
C. We now have jails full of people instead of retribution for all crimes
except those which require the death penalty.
This "new" Talmudic concept gave us the public school system which require
all students to proceed at the same pace regardless of individual abilities.
As a result, this great system has given us students who score at the bottom
scholastically among the industrialized nations. They are grossly overweight
and physically out of shape. At the same time many think of themselves
as being among the best, if not the best, in the world. Such a combination
makes them "fat, dumb and happy."
Our country is dangerously close to a popular uprising. The one thing
that is holding it back is the indifference among the average church leader.
That is caused by the total misunderstanding of the misnomer "Judeo-Christian."
That is a term of recent origin and in reality it CAN NOT exist. Some of
these churchmen are slowly learning. It is either the Talmud or the Bible.
George Washington's Surrender
"And many of the people of the land became Jews." (Esther 9:17) The
confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has
been well hidden by historians.
History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis
surrendered his army to General George Washington that American independence
came, and we have lived many years in happiness until the tribulations
of the twentieth century.
Jonathon Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis
revealed to Washington that, "a holy war will now begin on America, and
when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but
her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown."
Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction:
"Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than
two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government.
That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire.
All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed
by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all- seeing eye
of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry." And indeed George Washington himself
was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won
with his army.
Cornwallis well knew that his military defeat was only the beginning
of world catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue
until mind control could be accomplished through a false religion. What
he predicted has come to pass. A brief sketch of American religious history
shows us that Masonry has infused into every church in America with their
veiled Phallic religion. Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish
Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell started Jehovah
Witnesses' Judaism which is now worldwide with their message of the divine
kingdom. Mason Joseph Smith started Mormon Judaism with its Jewish teaching
of millennialism. At the turn of the twentieth century there appeared the
Scofield Bible with a Jewish interpretation of the prophecies.
With wide use of this "helpful" aid, almost all of the American churches
have silently become synagogues. We now have Baptist Jews, Methodist Jews,
Church of God Jews, apostate Catholic Jews, Fundamentalist Jews, and many
Protestant Jews throughout America. We are aliens in our own country because
of false religion. All are praying for divine deliverance into that "Divine
Government" which Cornwallis knew to be the British Empire. A false religion
has been used to deceive us into allegiance to our enemies of Yorktown
and Bunker Hill, who in turn were under the complete control of the Jewish
No! Not a gun has been fired but the invisible malignant process of
conquering America with the Jew's religion has gone on unabated. The Union
Jack has been planted in our hearts with religious deception. All has happened
"legally," "constitutionally" "freely" and completely within our most sacred
trust, our churches. Religious deception is painless inoculation against
truth. It cannot be removed from the conscience with surgery, yet it is
the motivator of our actions and directly controls our lives. Once man
gives over to false religion, he is no longer rational because he originates
no original thought. His life is controlled by whomever controls his religion.
The veil of false religion is the sword of Damacles and its power to control
humanity defies even the imagination of the tyrants who use it.
This is not to say that George Washington was a traitor willingly, or
even knowingly. He was beguiled into a Satanic religious order that insidiously
controls men's minds. So have American statesmen and military leaders down
through the years given aid and allegiance to the enemies of the United
States because they did not have knowledge of the invisible subterfuge
that stalks this land. Many eyes were opened when they read Wagner's Freemasonry
An Interpretation [Given by Senator Joseph McCarthy, six months before
his mouth was closed forever]. If every American would read it, they would
no longer ask why and how all this has happened.
There is no doubt, if one will only look and learn. We are fighting
a religious war. It is Judaism against Christianity. We have had a revival
of ancient Rabbinism and it will be a surprise to many who truly love our
Lord Jesus Christ to learn that the present teaching of the Kingdom of
God is identical with first century Rabbinism. This is no accident. It
has been carefully planned by the enemies of Jesus, and fed gradually to
the people, until today, most of our churches are promoting Judaism in
the name of Christianity.
Although the church denominations in the past have had differences of
opinion on some doctrines, they ALL agreed that the true Kingdom of God
is here on the Earth, and has been established in the New Jerusalem, the
United States of America. It has only been in the last one hundred years
or so, that the teaching of a still future, Kingdom of God has spread throughout
the land, causing great confusion. It will help to know the true and the
false teachings of the kingdom.
History - Part 26
If you should read Spiritual Communism and The Union
Jack, then you would understand that that the Pharisaic hypocrisy is not
at its peak, with the entire world control by the invisible Pharisee Jew;
and that they "stir up the people." (Acts 6:12; 13:50; 14:2; 17:13; 21:27)
All over the world in every way possible, even manipulating the wars to
whip communism, which they set up as a disguise. While controlling the
right wing anti-communists by telling us horrible things about communism
to keep us looking in that direction while the so-called "Chosen People"
set up their One World Government, a New World Order, through the guise
All too many, today, believe that the Jews occupy
Palestine in fulfillment of prophecy as declared by the Zionists; but all
the prophecies relating to the Jews returning to Palestine were made before
or during the time of captivity in Babylon, and all fulfilled at their
return from Babylonia captivity. They occupy Palestine today in fulfillment
of what Jesus said to them in John 8:44; that they would do the works of
their father, the devil -- NOT in fulfillment of prophecy that has already
If you are interested in how the so-called Holy Land
became transformed into a Zionist state, we present you the following information.
There are three causes:
1). False Zionist territorial claim to Palestine.
2). The Balfour Declaration.
3). The United Nations Participation Act.
The Zionist Jews that control the British Empire
and the United States are the framework of the plot. The Scofield Bible
has been used to mislead Christians into believing that the earthly throne
of David will be under the control of the Jews.
No Covenant Between Jews and
In "Issues," the quarterly periodical of the American
Council for Judaism, Vol. 12, No. 8, we find on pages 12-14: "Kaplan emphasizes
the existence of a Jewish people but denies their superiority. He contends
that Jews cannot prove the existence of any specific covenant between them
and God. Jews are neither superior human beings, nor do they possess a
superior tradition because of the Torah [Talmud], according to Kaplan.
He implies that other religious civilizations offer traditions equally
good. He also rejects the inference that Jewish chosenness consists of
heightened ethical responsibility.
Berger rejects the existence of a Jew people...He
says: I find nothing to support the thesis that there is such an entity
as a Jewish people except in the sense that among all Jews there are certain
similarities of religious belief and practice.
Berger argues that the people believing in the God
of Moses constituted a religious community, not a nationality. Moses was
the prime example for this point, since he had married a Medianite rather
than a Hebrew girl [Berger does not understand that Moses' wife 'WAS' an
Israelite Woman]. Berger rejects the divine origin of this early monotheistic
belief thus making it possible for him to refute by definition that divine
decree made of the Jews a distance people." (Mordecai M. Kaplan, Author
of "Judaism as a Civilization"; Rabbi Elmer Berger, Executive Director
of the American Council for Judaism).
Following is a quote from The Union Jack, p. 93:
"The Jew, in a fleshy racial sense does not exist and never has from Old
Testament times until the second appearance of Christ, at the final age
of Gospel. The only true application of Jew should be Pharisee, based on
the belief of Rabbinism or Talmudism. Therefore, our use of Jew refers
to a religious sect, based on Luciferianism."
Communism is Jewish
What do George Bush, Helmut Kohl, John Major, most Western leaders,
Mikhail Gorbachev, Boris Yeltsin, and Eduard Shevardnaze all have in common?
They are all socialists, secular humanists and globalists, working for
a common socialist global government, called by Bush and Gorbachev "The
New World Order."
A few years ago the "convergence theory" of history
emerged. It held that America and the West would move to the political
left, the Soviets would move to the political right, and we would all meet
and merge in the middle as socialists or Social Democrats. The "covergence
theory" of history seems to be right on track. Socialist Russia, socialist
Eastern Europe and socialist Western Europe are all moving toward merging
into one giant unitary state or federation over the next five years or
so. It is believed by many that A massive Soviet subversion and absorption
of Western Europe will follow.
Reorganizing the USSR From Top
Soviet leaders in the Central Committee, the Politburo,
the KGB and the Soviet Academy of Sciences began to conclude over a decade
ago that in spite of the USSR's vast natural and human resources, that
the country was utilizing those resources in a most "barbaric manner."
They have concluded over the past decade that Soviet
industry is lagging badly behind the West, especially in controlling wastefulness
of materials and energy, as well as human resources. Soviet industry uses
two to two-and-a-half times more material resources and one to one-and-a-half
times more energy per unit of production than Western countries do. Gorbachev
and the Soviet leaders have therefore called for the reorganization of
Soviet society from top to bottom, but within the framework of socialism.
The "new economic policy" is called "free market"
and borrows much terminology from the West, but to Gorbachev and the Soviet
leadership, "free market" means state and collectively owned property,
businesses still state-run and state-controlled, business or investment
profits are still illegal, etc. To the Soviets, "free market" means only
that they will trade with us, while to Westerners, when the Soviets use
the term, they think the USSR is in a transition to capitalism.
Another example of word/concept manipulation is "liberation
theology." The Soviets hatched "liberation theology" about 15 years ago,
which is a diabolical and seductive use of Marxist-Leninist doctrine wrapped
up in Christian/Biblical terminology, doctrines, etc. Liberation theology
has been a smashing success for the Communists in Central and Latin America,
South Africa, and the Philippines. Now they are taking Marxist and socialist
concepts and wrapping them up in free market terminology, concepts, etc.,
to seduce gullible Western political and business leaders.
When Gorbachev talks about stagnation, electronization
of industry, opening the country to market economy, democratization of
society, etc., he is really talking about getting rid of the corrupt, overpaid,
inefficient bureaucrats who are now running the Soviet Union instead of
the workers. The bloated bureaucracy is about to be cut away, "because
it has lost its revolutionary fervor."
As Gorbachev said at the XXVth CPSU Congress: "What
we see today is not the working class running the Soviet Union, but the
bureaucracy, which is satisfied to occupy soft and lucrative positions,
but is hardly interested in revolutionary movements, political undermining
of the rest of the world, or military expansion of Communism. This is clearly
The New Soviet Approach--The
Velvet Glove vs. The Ironclad Fist
Since 1917, the Communists have hated nationalism
and nationalists, who stand for strong national entities as opposed to
the international order sought by the Communists. According to the Socialist/Communist
ideology, nationalism hinders the development of socialism and eventually
Communism, and is counter-internationalist. From the '60s to the '80s,
nationalists in the Baltic States, Byelorussia and Ukraine have been under
incessant attack by the Communists.
However, with glasnost-perestroika, the situation
seemingly changed. National symbols such as flags and other objects were
suddenly allowed. Literally overnight, people turned to the old national
emblems, parading them in front of the Communists as if they had won the
battle for national survival. The nationalists in the Baltics and other
republics exposed themselves and left no doubt as to who they were. This
bringing potential enemies to the surface was probably the main goal of
the CPSU. Over the past few years, the Soviets have allowed nationalist
opposition to emerge, and have then turned around and infiltrated it, financed
it, and co-opted [or taken over] much of it.
The Soviets are masters at either creating or taking
over their own opposition. They did this with Solidarity in Poland, the
New Salvation Front in Romania, and with Shevardnadze and Yeltsin in the
USSR. Much more advantageous than destroying their opposition is to create
or co-opt it so they can use it for their own purposes.
We hear a great deal about the "hardliners" versus
the "reformers," or the "conservatives" versus the "liberals." Western
leaders, like Bush, and the Western media describe the "hardliners" [or
"conservatives"] as unrepentant Communist hawks, [i.e., such as the "gang
of eight"]; and the "reformers" [or "liberals"] as lovers of freedom, democracy
and free markets [such as Gorbachev, Shevardnaze and Yeltsin]. In reality,
both groups are hard-core Marxist-Leninist Communists, hell-bent on Soviet
world domination or conquest. They simply disagree on the most advantageous
method for our destruction.
The "hardliners" would bludgeon us to death with
an ironclad fist; the "reformers" would strangle us with a velvet glove.
The result is the same, our destruction. The quarrel between the so-called
"conservatives" and "liberals" is over methodology, not results or the
final outcome. The reformers believe you can catch more flies with honey
than vinegar. Gorbachev is widely viewed and described as a reformer, a
liberal, and a lover of democracy. And yet, in December '89, he said: "I
am a Communist, a convinced Communist. For some that may be a fantasy.
But for me, it is my main goal."
In November '87, Gorbachev said: "In our work and
worries, we are motivated by those Leninist ideals and noble endeavors
and goals which mobilized the workers of Russia seven decades ago to fight
for the new and happy world of socialism. Perestroika is a continuation
of the October Revolution."
That same Gorbachev, described to the West as a lover
of democracy and freedom, said in November '87: "We are moving toward a
new world, the world of Communism. We shall never turn off that road."
And in June '90, Gorbachev, "the reformer," said:
"I am now, just as I've always been, a convinced Communist. It's useless
to deny the enormous and unique contribution of Marx, Engels and Lenin
to the history of social thought and to modern civilization as a whole."
Gorbachev, Shevardnaze, Yeltsin, and the reform wing
of the CPSU are dedicated Communists, they hate the American and other
Western "imperialists," and they still believe in the inevitability of
the Communist conquest of the world, but they believe a different strategy
is presently needed for success. They want to discard the old "hardline"
strategy of confrontation, divide and conquer, making enemies, etc., and
instead adopt a strategy of cooperation, of embracing the West, making
the West friendly to the socialist world, and eventually they intend [through
subtlety, deception, infiltration, subversion, and manipulation] to "absorb"
the West. Western Europe will be the first to be so absorbed.
And if that doesn't work Dimitri Manuilski, professor
at the Lenin School of Political Warfare, under whom Gorbachev trained,
said over fifty years ago: "War to the hilt between Communism and Capitalism
is inevitable. Today of course we are not strong enough to attack. Our
time will come...to win we shall need the element of surprise. The Western
World will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the
most spectacular Peace Movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures
and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries stupid and decadent
will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another
chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down WE WILL SMASH THEM
WITH OUR CLENCHED FIST."
Every word of this is being fulfilled before our
very eyes. Sure the Soviets will appear to make concessions, abandon the
old East European dictators and call for peace, but when the foolish Israel
nations of the Western world are disarmed and defenseless, they will attack
in an attempt to destroy us.
The "reformers" want to incorporate their "new thinking"
into the world thinking process in order to ultimately control world politics.
They want the economy of the world to be integrated with the economy of
the Soviet Union. They plan to take over the world the way the AIDS virus
takes over the body, slowly, subtly, surreptitiously. It is important for
the West to understand that Gorbachev, Shevardnaze and Yeltsin [the "reformers"]
are just as dangerous enemies to our survival as the "gang of eight" [the
In fact, these reformers are more dangerous because
they have caused the West to lower its threat perception, to lower its
guard. Better the enemy you can see and defend against than the enemy who
comes to you as a friend, as Brutus did to Julius Caesar before he stabbed
The "reformers" will tell us what we want to hear,
they will talk about democracy, free elections, free markets, multi-party
systems, freedom, independence, etc., while giving these words their own
Marxist-Leninist twist or meaning. If you are strangled by the hand in
the velvet glove, instead of being bludgeoned by the ironclad fist, you
are still just as dead!
The New Soviet Federation
We are being told that the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics [USSR] is collapsing. That is not really true. It is being voluntarily
disbanded by the Soviet leadership in favor of a new federation [or union]
to be called the Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics. this restructuring
[not disintegration as it is portrayed by Soviet disinformation and the
Western media] of the USSR [the Evil Empire] has been on the drawing boards
since before Gorbachev came to power [actually dating back to the late
The leaders of the Soviet Union at that time began
to realize that the present form of the Soviet Empire was archaic, inefficient,
and ecounter-productive to further global expansion, except in remote areas
of the world [i.e. Africa, Nicaragua] not contiguous to the USSR.
In a certain sense, the Western policy of "containment"
and the advent of NATO in the '50s had been reasonably successful in restricting
the USSR's European growth beyond Eastern Europe and the soviet republics.
Just as slavery in the old American south had become unprofitable, not
productive and uneconomical before the U.S. Civil War, so the Soviet Empire
was seen over a decade ago to need deep reform in its imperial structure.
The Rebirth of Imperial Russia
For the past nearly two thousand years there has
been a conflict that has embroiled not only the two major participants
but the entire world. When the early Christians began telling everyone
that the Savior had already come and that we must rid ourselves of Phariseeism
[later Talmudism, and even later Judaism], the Jews began their unending
contest to regain the birthright their father Easu had sold to Jacob-Israel.
They would shout to anyone who would listen that Christian Israelites were:
"These that have turned the world upside down are come hither also." (Acts
History - Part 27
Jesus told them in a parable straight-out, "Therefore
say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to
a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." (Matthew 21:43) If anyone
might question the final outcome of this battle of two millenniums, the
next verse in Matthew 21:44 should suffice. "And whosoever shall fall on
this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind
him to powder."
The battle began and it has never let up. At first,
the antichrists were on top and the Bible tells only a very small number
of things they did. But Christianity continued to grow and influence the
entire world in morals and customs. The anti-christs penetrated the early
Universal Church with very clever heresies which came from the minds of
the masters of intrigue. The Universal Church decayed into the Popish Church
because of it.
Martin Luther tried to reform it but the Protestant
Reformation has penetrated even more deeply than the earlier Universal
Church. Christians would fight back with all the means at their disposal,
with only limited effect.
Finally, the inquisitions were ordered. This had
only a limited, short term effect. the mistake was made to allow the antichrists
to be baptized and become "Christians." Thus, now they could continue their
efforts to destroy Christianity from within. Many took positions of leadership
within the church. Until finally they took absolute control in the 19th
century. Contrary to what is taught in the modern seminaries and contrary
to the current array of laws designed to show the antichrists as the winner,
the fight still rages.
Proceeding now to more modern times, the question
is often raised to determine the role that greater Russia has played in
this battle of the ages. It has been by sheer predestination that the people
of Eastern Europe and Russia have brought the battle to the struggle we
see today. We will attempt to shed some new light on current affairs in
The examples given are by no means the most important
that have occurred in recent years, however, they are current and perhaps,
through that, you can better understand the conspiracy that still exists.
By now most Christians must be wondering what all of the activity in Russia
portends for the future. We have attempted to show you previously and will
continue to attempt to show you further own in this presentation. It is
an attempt to lead you through the maze of the multitude of analyses that
are being published, in such number as to stagger the mind.
However, there are some observations that we can
make that should give some insight as to how current affairs fit together
in the continuation of that great battle, between Christianity and Satan
and his children. Some of these observations are a little humorous [if
it weren't so deadly serious] and are somewhat analogous to the "rats leaving
the sinking ship!"
By now, every person in the United States should
[but doesn't] realize that the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 was funded
by Wall Street and the Jewish International Bankers. The conduct of the
revolution was carried out by a predominantly Jewish group of approximately
300 well trained revolutionaries. Communism, the 1905 and 1917 Bolshevik
Revolutions and the USSR came from the minds of Talmudic Jewry. The September
10th, 1920 issue of the American Hebrew, says it all: "The Bolshevist revolution
in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of
Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What
was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thinks to Jewish brains,
and because of Jewish dissatisfaction and by Jewish planning, shall also,
through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all
over the world."
It is recognized that the Communist dream in Russia
backfired on the perpetrators. Stalin's purge eliminated many of the original
leaders, along with their followers. However, the entire government of
the USSR was manipulated from within by the same Talmudic forces. The military
was required to have a political commissar in each division who was Jewish.
The KGB was staffed almost entirely with Jewish agents.
However, as the world, and particularly the people
of Russia, saw the utter futility of the Talmudic Communist dream, the
Jews of the world started to distance themselves from the ideals of the
Soviet Union and from world Communism, at least on the surface. We are
now witnessing what is being presented to the world as the dissolution
of the Communist structure, at least in Russia proper. We are also observing
all sorts of "slight-of-hand" tricks to remove Talmudic Jewry and Zionism
from Communism. For example, when the recent coup was presented to us,
the controlled media here in the United States blatantly lied as to who
the perpetrators were. Instead of informing the public that the leaders
of the coup were hardline Communist leaders [which all of know is defined
as extreme left-wing], they repeatedly told us that they were radical conservatives
of the extreme right-wing!
This sort of intellectual dishonesty has been growing
for some time now. It has already been shown that Talmudic Jewry is very
Socialistic in nature. The United States Congress conducted many investigations
into Communistic influence in our country in the '40s, '50s and early '60s.
However, any Congressman, who spoke out on this obvious connection was
immediately labeled as anti-Semitic. Men like Joseph McCarthy were driven
to their graves with vitriolic epithets such as "McCarthyism."
As the Jewish love affair with Communism waned in
the late '60s and '70s, their political affiliations also changed. For
many years, the description of "right-wing" and "left-wing" used the ordinary
circle in its definition. The centrist position was at the top of the circle
and as a person became more "right-wing" he would move clockwise around
the circle until he reached the bottom of the circle, at which time he
became known as a Nazi or a National Socialist. If he moved counter-clockwise
around the circle he became more "left-wing" until he would reach the bottom
of the circle and he would then become known as a Communist. Both the extreme
right-wing and the extreme left-wing joined at the bottom of the circle.
At least, this was the case by definition.
A mass exodus was taking place all over the world
from Communism by Talmudic Jewry. Many of them left the "left-wing" or
Socialist-Communist persuasion and became "neo-conservatives" but they
did it with a particular flair. They retained many of their Socialist views
but joined the so-called Republican party and brought into it the totalitarianism
of the old Federalists.
Consequently, greatly because of them, the old circle
description of "left" and "right" had to be replaced. It was replaced in
political science circles with what is called the Nolan Chart. The definitions
are changed. A graph is formed with the ordinate or y axis reflecting social
freedoms and is measured from 0 to 100%. This is called "left-wing." The
abscissa or x axis represents the economic freedoms and is likewise measured
from 0 to 100%. This is called "right-wing."
Those who not many years ago were classified as Communists,
can now fight for "social freedoms" such as homosexuality, pre-marital
sex, sex education [Kindergarten through 12th grade], women's liberation,
liberalization of drug use, total pluralism, freedom from Christian principles,
etc. At the same time, they can have the economic freedoms of the free
enterprise system guaranteed by the Christian principles. The only problem
is that they won't heed the limitations of economic freedoms placed on
them by the same Christian principles.
The first response to this dichotomy is that they
have given up Communism. No, they haven't given up Communism. They have
gained the social freedoms that they couldn't have even in the Soviet Union
and at the same time have unlimited economic freedoms, far exceeding the
limits of Christian principles.
Returning to the Russian scene. During the recent
coup attempt, three young men were killed in the heat of the confrontation.
One of the young men was Jewish and the other two were non-Jewish. The
Russian people considered them all to be martyrs and a much publicized
public service was held for them. The visibility of Russian Orthodox priests
was very evident. This appears to mean that the Christian Church is once
again being recognized. In fact, it is very obvious that the Christian
Church is in the forefront of the massive changes being seen in Russia.
Whether its being orchestrated by the KGB or the Communist Central Committee
remains to be seen.
At the public service a Rabbi was also allowed to
conduct his service for the young Jewish man who was killed. It is significant
that this young Jewish man had recently been given his immigration visa
to go to Israel.
What has been the response to these actions within
the leadership of the American Jewish community? This can best be described
by excerpting from an article found in the Religious News Service for August
30, 1991. The article was written by Rabbi James Rudin who is the director
of the American Jewish Committee's interreligious affairs and is a founder
of the National Interreligious Task Force on Soviet Jewry.
After citing the incident described above he says,
"For nearly 75 year the Soviet Union has officially been an atheistic state,
and for many of those years, the Communist rulers carried out an aggressive
campaign that prohibited parents from giving spiritual instruction to their
children, closed seminaries, persecuted believers and suppressed the publication
and distribution of prayer books, Bibles and other articles of religious
expression. Soviet Jews, Ukrainian Roman Catholics and Pentecostal Christians
were special targets of the Communist authorities.
The Soviet regime often sponsored acts of anti-Semitism,
and Jewish activists like Natan Scharansky were falsely imprisoned for
many years. Many Jews who sought visas to leave the Soviet Union were kept
waiting for years, and a new word, 'refusnik,' entered our vocabulary.
For over 20 years, the struggle to bring freedom
to Soviet Jewry has been one of the world's major human rights efforts.
In this country Jews and Christians worked together in a remarkable interreligious
effort that helped keep the Soviet Jewry movement alive, even in its darkest
At the same time that Jews were leaving in record
numbers, the old Soviet anti-religion policy was weakened, and then finally
abandoned. Religious faith, the first target of every totalitarian regime,
has emerged with renewed vigor and credibility. Although the recent public
funeral in Moscow was a sad occasion, it was also a symbolic confirmation
of the failure of the atheistic Soviet state.
But with this sense of confirmation must also come
a sense of caution. During Tsarist rule in Russia, religious faith, especially
that of the Russian Orthodox Church, was often source of extreme nationalism,
xenophobia and anti-Semitism. The intense entanglement of the church and
the regime usually resulted in political corruption and moral decadence.
In the popular mind, this likage is personified by Gregor Rasputin, an
Orthodox priest who wielded enormous political power during the last days
of the Romanov dynasty.
Indeed, the very name, Rasputin, has come to mean
the evil influence of religion in the affairs of state. Today we rejoice
that religion in the Soviet Union has been freed from the dungeon and has
entered into the light of freedom. However, we must remain vigilant. With
credibility comes responsibility.
Just as we pressed our campaign to bring freedom
to Jews and Christians who suffered under Communist rule, we must now press
with equal commitment our campaign to guarantee that religion within the
USSR does not now become an instrument for new prejudice and repression.
Many positive things have happened in the world of
religion since 1917. Hopefully, the hard won principles of religious liberty,
individual conscience, minority rights and religious pluralism will also
become an integral part of the republics of the USSR. The symbolism and
the rabbi and the patriarch drawn together by tragedy was both startling
This is a typical example of intellectual dishonesty.
Let us go over his points one by one. "For nearly 75 years the Soviet Union
has officially been an atheistic state...closing seminaries, persecuted
believers... suppressed...Soviet Jews, Ukrainian Roman Catholics and Pentecostal
This is now 1999 and 83 years ago was 1916. That
was the very time that his own people were creating the revolution and
were assisted financially by people of like religious persuasion in the
United States. Their intentions from the outset were that Russia would
be atheistic. He indicates that Jews, Roman Catholics, and Pentecostal
Christians were the targets. Which is a bald face lie the Jews were NEVER
targets, it was the Christians who were murdered by the millions by the
Jews, not by some other group. No mention is made of the Russian Orthodox
Church. This is significant.
The Church Times in London on April 13, 1923 said:
"Already twenty-eight bishops and twelve hundred priests of the Russian
Holy Orthodox Church have been sacrificed to the Bolshevik [Jewish] hatred
of the Christian Faith. "Many Jews who sought visas to leave the Soviet
Union were kept waiting for years..."
The Jews were the ONLY ones who were allowed to leave.
Some had to wait because they were employed in sensitive military or government
positions and were forced to wait until they could be cleared by the higher
Soviet Jewish authorities. "The regime...sponsored...anti-Semitism, and
Jewish activists like Natan Scharansky were falsely imprisoned for many
years...'refusnik' entered our vocabulary."
Our history books don't read quite that way. George
Bernard Shaw, quoted in The Jewish Guardian of London on August 7, 1931
said: "I have seen the statement which Joseph Stalin gave recently to the
Jewish Telegraphic Agency on Anti-Semitism and in which the Soviet leader
said that UNDER THE SOVIET LAWS MILITANT ANTI-SEMITISM IS PUNISHABLE BY
Also, Kurt Blumenfeld stated in The Jewish Frontier
(New York), January 1942, "Up to 50% of the Jews in the Soviet Union are
engaged as officials, clerks and in the intellectual profession. In the
totalitarian Communist system the Jew, instead of being engaged in trade
and business, has been the official, the employee of the State."
Rabbi Rudin makes no mention that the Jews officiated
in the Soviet regime. "During Tsarist rule in Russia...the Russian Orthodox
Church was often a source of extreme nationalism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism...resulted
in political corruption and moral decadence...this linkage is personified
by Gregor Rasputin, an Orthodox priest who wielded enormous political power
during the last days of the Romanov dynasty...Rasputin, has come to mean
the evil influence of religion in the affairs of state."
Grigory Yefimovich Rasputin was born in 1872 and
died December 30, 1916 in St. Petersburg. He was a Siberian peasant and
mystic whose ability to improve the condition of Alexis Nikolayevich, the
hemophiliac heir to the Russian throne, made him a powerful favorite in
the court of Emperor Nicholas II and Empress Alexandra. After a two year
study at Mt. Athos in Greece, he returned to Russia and soon became widely
known for his healing arts.
History - Part 28
He was in no way a Russian Orthodox Priest. The high
society of St. Petersburg warmly received the filthy, unkept peasant with
brilliant eyes and extraordinary healing talents. He was recommended by
high church officials to the imperial family in 1905 because of his ability
to heal illness.
When he demonstrated an ability to ease the suffering
of the young Alexis, he was welcomed into the family circle as a close
and trusted friend, and Alexandra came to revere him as a holy man sent
by God to save her son, the Romanov dynasty, and the Russian autocracy.
When Emperor Nicholas II went off to take command
of the army during World War I, the Empress Alexandra acquired greater
control of the domestic affairs. Rasputin moved in and replaced capable
officials with unscrupulous men who made decisions adverse to the best
interests of the Christian Tzars and to Russia. It is possible that these
men were but forerunners of the 1917 revolution. The friends of the aristocracy
attempted to kill him by poison which didn't work and then by shooting
him twice which also didn't work. Finally they succeeded by drowning him
in the Neva River by throwing him in a hole in the ice covered river.
It is true that Rasputin was a very base and course
individual with unclean and immoral habits. But he was in no way a Russian
Orthodox Priest and he certainly did not represent the "intense entanglement
of the church and the regime (which) usually resulted in Political corruption
and moral decadence."
Rabbi Rudin stated, "Just as we pressed our campaign
to bring freedom to Jews and Christians who suffered under Communist rule,
we must now press with equal commitment our campaign to guarantee that
religion within the USSR does not now become an instrument for new prejudice
and repression. Many positive things have happened in the world of religion
since 1917..." It is certainly true many things have happened in the world
or religion since 1917. But they have been anything but positive.
Since 1917, Christianity has been changed into Judeo-Christianity.
The term was never heard of 75 years ago. Judeo-Christianity with its pluralism
is now ordaining homosexuals and women. The greatest debates now going
on in official church councils relate to the values of pre-marital sex
and extra-marital sexual relationships.
It is common knowledge that the so-called Christian
book publishers are owned by non-Christians. The seminaries use Jewish
Rabbis as teachers of the Bible. There are very few individual Christian
Churches where the evils of our society and government are addressed. The
people are staying home, just like they did in Russia, and are receiving
their guidance from those government approved preachers on television and
Dr. Samuel Max Malamed, himself a Jew and an authority
on the origin of Communism, stated as editor of The Reflex, published in
New York, in the November 1927 issue, Vol. 1, No. 5, on page 7, the following:
"The Russian Jew is often accused of being responsible for the rise of
Bolshevism and for the continuation of the Bolshevist regime. This accusation
is founded on fact that so many Jews were to be found in the offices of
the Soviet government in the first years of the revolution, and that their
number was out of proportion to the Jews in Russia. This fact cannot be
Clare Sheridan, the well-known journalist and student
of the origin of Communism, stated in The New York World, in an exhaustive
analysis of the origin of Communism, on December 13, 1920, on page 13,
the following: "The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered
by them. They are in every Government office, in every bureau, in every
Sir Winston Churchill (who was himself a half Jew),
as familiar as any person in the world with the origin of Communism, was
the author of an article on that subject published in London, in Illustrated
Sunday Herald of February 8, 1920, on page 5 which among other things included
this observation: "The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish
places of worship or excepted by the Bolshevists from their universal hostility
has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with villainies
which are now being perpetrated."
The British Guardian of London, recognized throughout
the world as a highly dependable source of information on the origin of
Communism, on March 13, 1925, published in Vol, 6, No. 10, on page 73,
the following: "...The majority of the most influential Bolshevist leaders
Henry C. Emery, in his analysis of the origin of
Communism, published in The Yale Review of New Haven, stated July 1919,
in Vol. 8, No. 4 on page 676 of that scholarly study, the following: "In
the minds of some people, especially in Russia, Bolshevism takes on the
color of a revolt of the Jews against Russians..."
David Lloyd George, the British Prime Minister at
the time of the overthrow of the Russian Government by the Communist revolution
in 1917, is quoted in The World At the Crossroads, published in 1921 in
Boston, by its Russian author Boris Leo Brazol, as having stated: "...The
Jews of Russia wielded considerable influence in Bolshevik circles."
The Communist publication Kommunist of Kharkov, Russia,
in its April 12, 1919 issue reported the following concerning the origin
of Communism, according to The World Hoax, published in Asheville, North
Carolina in 1938 by Ernest F. Elmhurst: "Without exaggeration, it may be
said that the great Russian Revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands
of the Jews."
George Pitt-Rivers in his classic, The World Significance
of the Russian Revolution, published in 1920 at Oxford, observed the following
concerning the origin of Communism: "...Jewry, as a whole, strove every
nerve to secure and heartily approved of the overthrow of the Russian monarchy,
which they regarded as their most formidable obstacle in the path of their
Rabbi Judah Leon Magnes, whose understanding of the
origin of Communism commanded the respect of his co- religionists as an
expert on the subject, stated in The Jewish Forum on February 1919, published
in New York, on page 722, this observation on the Bolshevik Revolution
of 1917: "The revolution in Russia set free creative forces -- and look
what a large company of Jews were available for immediate service."
Harry Waton, himself a Jew and a recognized authority
on the question of the origin of Communism, is quoted by others as having
stated in his book, A Program For The Jews and Humanity, published in 1939
in New York, on pages 143-144 the following: "...In the Russian revolution
the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism..."
The Jewish World, of London in its August 18, 1922
issue, is quoted by Colin Jordan in his Fraudulent Conversion, published
in London in 1955, as having published the following: "Business is gaining
in Russia, and with the new regime Jews are promptly becoming the captains
Robert Wilton in his history of the origin of Communism,
The Last Days of the Romanovs, published in 1920 in New York, reveals the
illuminating fact on page 391 as follows: "Taken according to the numbers
of population, the Jews represented one in ten; among the commissars that
rule Bolshevist Russia they are nine in ten, if anything, the proportion
of Jews is still higher."
William Jocobus Oudendijk, Netherlands Minister in
Petrograd during the Bolshevik revolution, in his excellent explanation
of the origin of Communism, Ways and By-Ways in Diplomacy, published in
London in 1939 states on page 246: "Those who were not for the Bolsheviks
were not allowed to be against them; they were to be exterminated."
The eminent Professor Charles Sarolea, of the University
of Edinburgh, in his analysis of the origin of Communism, Impressions of
the Soviet Russia, published in 1924 in London, on page 159 states as follows:
"That the Jews have played a leading part in the Bolshevist upheaval and
are still playing a leading part in the Bolshevist Government is a proposition
which no one will deny who has taken the trouble to study Russian affairs
at first hand."
Before the Committee on the Judiciary of the United
States Senate, in Washington, D.C. in 1920, dealing with Bolshevik Propaganda,
Colonel V.S. Hurban, Military Attache of the Czechoslovak Legation in Washington,
D.C., in sworn testimony testified to the following: "Perhaps I choose
a very difficult question when I speak of the role of the Jews in the Russian
revolution...I can not deny it, because it is a fact, and it is useless
to deny it, that in the Soviets from the beginning there have been a very
large percentage of Jews. It cannot be denied."
In an exhaustive study on the Origin of Communism
published by Small, Maynard & Co. of Boston, Mass. in 1920, under the
title The Protocols and World Revolution, not to be confused with the book
of a similar name, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, The Morning Post
of London is quoted as having published on April 9, 1991 the following:
"These Jews are at the present time in control of the Russian Government
and they have powerful friends in all the Allied countries who are helping
DeWitt Clinton Poole, Jr., the head of the Division
of Russian Affairs in the Department of State in Washington, D.C., prepared
a "confidential" memorandum for the Secretary of State, on October 28,
1921, which contained the following statement: "One of the American prisoners
who recently returned from Russia made the following comment upon the position
of Jews in Russia: (1) though he saw many Commissars, he saw none who was
not a Jew; (2) he was tried by seven judges, all of whom were Jews."
The New York Times on February 17, 1938, on page
5, quoted Giornale d' Italia of Rome, which published that Feodor Budenko,
Charge d'Affairs of the Soviet Legation in Bucharest, Rumania, after severing
all connections with Bolshevism and fleeing to Rome, stated the following:
"Jews who have replaced pre-Bolshevist capitalists and who virtually control
big industry now have a monopoly of production and live lives of luxury."
The Morning Post of London on August 30, 1919 again
quoted by Small, Maynard & Co. of Boston, Mass., in 1920, as above
mentioned, published the following: "It is unfortunately true that Bolshevism
is very largely a Jewish movement. In Russia the Jewish Bolsheviks have
taken a terrible revenge upon all whom they regarded as enemies..."
Sefton Delmer, in The Daily Express of London on
January 29, 1953, is quoted in Fraudulent Conversion published in London
in 1955, by Colin Jordan, as having stated: "When I last visited Russia
in 1947 I found Jews in key positions everywhere. I found them in the Foreign
Office, in factories, in the secret police, and in universities. Not only
in Moscow and in Leningrad either, but in provincial Stalingrad."
Angelo S. Rappoport, himself a Jew and the author
of a revealing classic on the origin of Communism, Pioneers of the Russian
Revolution, published in 1918 in London, in referring to the extent of
their authority throughout Russia, states on page 250 as follows: "There
was no political organization in the vast empire that was not influenced
by Jews or directed by them."
Reverend Denis Fahey in his comprehensive exposure
of the origin of Communism, The Rulers Of Russia, published in Dublin,
Ireland in 1939, quotes J. Fontenoy of Geneva, Switzerland, in his Counter-Revolution
published in 1937, in which the following appears: "On my arrival in USSR
in 1934, I remember I was struck by the enormous proportion of Jewish functionaries
everywhere. In the Press, and diplomatic circles, it was difficult to find
Lt. Col. P.R. Malone, a Pro-Bolshevik Member of Parliament
and married to a Jewess, in the official publication, Parliamentary Debates,
reported in Great Britain's House of commons, in Vol. 120, November 5,
1919, in column 945, is reported to have stated: "It is said openly that
the Soviet Government is a Government of the Jews...Of course there are
Jews in control of Russia. There are Jews behind the Commissars."
The illustrious Hilaire Belloc is quoted by Reverend
Denis Fahey, in his Rulers Of Russia, as having stated in London publication,
G.K.'s Weekly, in its February 4, 1937 issue, the following: "As far anyone
who does not know that the present revolutionary Bolshevist movement is
Jewish in Russia, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in
by the suppressions of our deplorable press."
The eminent Robert Vaucher, an authority on the first
revolution in 1905 and the second revolution in 1917, by Bolsheviks in
Russia, in an article in L'illustration, published in Paris, in its September
14, 1918 issue, concerning the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, on page 259 states
as follows: "The more one studies the second revolution, the more he is
convinced that Bolshevism is a Jewish movement..."
The Jewish Voice published in New York, in Vol. 2,
No. 1 of January 1942, contained Joseph Stalin's statement on Anti-Semitism,
given by Stalin to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency on January 12, 1931, expounding
upon Stalin's stand against anti-Semitism as follows: "In the USSR anti-Semitism
is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon profoundly hostile to the Soviet
system. According to the laws of the USSR active anti-Semites are punished
Moissaye J. Olgin, himself a Jew, in his study on
the origin of Communism, published in the magazine Asia, in December 1917,
page 780, describes how Lenin disposed of those who opposed Communism thus:
"Lenin does not reply to an opponent; he vivisects him."
The Times of London, on March 29, 1919 on page 10,
offers evidence that Lenin was the hatchet-man of the Bolshevist movement
under the direction of commissar Jews in control of the Bolshevik revolution
as follows: "If Lenin is the brains of the movement, the Jews provide the
executive officers. Of the leading commissars, Trotsky, Zinovieff, Kameneff,
Stekloff, Sverdloff, Uritsky, Joffe, Rekovsky, Radek, Menjinsky, Larin,
Bronski, Zaalkind, Volodarsky, Petroff, Litvinoff, Smidovitch, and Vorosky
are all of them of the Jewish race, while amongst the minor Soviet officials
the number is legion."
Robert Wilton, in his celebrated history of the origin
of Communism, The Last Days of the Romanovs, published in 1920 in New York,
recounts the murder of the Czar, on pages 392-393 as follows: "...The Jews
were not Russians and to them the destruction of Russia was all in the
way of business, revolutionary or financial. The whole record of Bolshevism
in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The
murder of the Czar deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov...and carried
out by the Jews, Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yurovsky,
is an act not of the Russian people but of this hostile invader."
Eric D. Butler of Adelaide, Australia in 1946 published
his book, The International Jew, not to be confused with another book of
a similar name, in which Jacob H. Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Company, in
New York, predicts the second revolution in Russia, on pages 60-61, as
follows: "Russia eventually accepted the mediation of America in connection
with this reign of terror [the 1905 first Bolshevik revolution in Russia],
and Count Witte was the Russian representative. Now, as Count Witte was
married to a Jewess, he could hardly be termed 'anti-Semitic.' Jacob Schiff
attended in person with the official American representative. At this conference
of mediation, and made it quite clear that the cause of the internal trouble
in Russia was the status of his fellow Jews. Count Witte tried to point
out that most of the reports about the treatment of Jews in Russia were
rather exaggerated, whereupon Schiff said, 'If the Czar will not accord
our people these desired liberties, then a revolution will bring about
a republic which will assure us our rights.'"
History - Part 30
That tyranny is kept in existence by the same means
by which it was set up. In Red Dusk and the Morrow, p. 303, by Sir Paul
Dukes, formerly Chief of the British Secret Service in Russia, we read
that a Lithuanian asked a prominent Bolshevik how the regime was maintained.
The answer was: "Our power is based on three things: first, on Jewish brains;
secondly, on Lettish and Chinese bayonets; and thirdly, on the crass stupidity
of the Russian people."
Lenin wrote: "We deny all morality in the bourgeois
sense, for according to the bourgeois, morality has its origin in the Commandments
of God...our morality, on the contrary, is entirely subordinate to the
interests of the proletariat."
Mr. Hilaire Belloc wrote in G.K.'s Weekly, February
4, 1937: "As for anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary
Bolshevist movement is Jewish in Russia, I can only say that he must be
a man who is taken in by the suppressions of our deplorable Press."
Mr. Oudendyke, the representative of the Netherlands
Government at St. Petersburg, when the Bolshevists began their reign of
terror. Mr. Balfour received the report via Christiania on September 18,
1918. It was published as a British White Paper in April, 1919, and was
entitled "Russia, No 1 (1919), A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in
Russia. The following is extracted from Mr. Oudendyke's Report: "The danger
is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British
and all other Governments to the fact that, if an end is not put to Bolshevism
at once, the civilization of the whole world is threatened. This is not
an exaggeration, but a somber matter of fact...I consider that the immediate
suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not
even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated,
Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one
form or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and
worked by Jews who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy
for their own ends the existing order of things. The only manner in which
this danger can be averted would be collective action on the part of all
In addition to the information about the Jewish Banking
Houses which financed the Russian Revolution, the document also gives the
long list of Jews who took over the direction of the Russian people in
1917. Lenin is given as a Russian, but all the other twenty-four given
on the list -- Trotsky, Zinovieff, Kameneff, Parvus, etc. are stated to
In Appendix B, of All These Things, by A.N. Field,
quotes from Vol. III of United States Senate Document No. 62, 66th Congress,
First Session, some extracts from the evidence of Rev. George A. Simons,
Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Petrograd from 1907
to October 6th, 1918, before a Committee of the United States Senate on
February 12, 1919. The Rev. Mr. Simons stated with regard to the Bolshevik
Government in Petrograd: "In December, 1918...under the presidency of a
man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)...out of 388 members, only 16 happened
to be real Russians, and all the rest Jews, with the exception of one man
who is a negro from North America...and 265 of these Jews belonging to
this Northern Commune government that is sitting in the old Smolny Institute
come from the Lower East Side of New York, 265 of them."
Mr. Field also remarked in Appendix B of his book,
All These Things: "Lenin was married to a Jewess, spoke Yiddish in his
family circle, and Dr. Chaim Weizmann, Jewish Zionist leader, was quoted
in the London Jewish Chronicle of December 16, 1932, as saying that Lenin
had taken part in Jewish student meetings in Switzerland thirty-five years
before. He is generally regarded as a Russian, but there is doubt."
In her book, From Liberty to Brest-Litovsk, MacMillan,
1919, the Russian lady, Ariadna Tyrkova-Williams, widow of the late Dr.
Harold Williams, a longtime Manchester Guardian correspondent in Russia,
describes the events of the first year of the Russian Revolution.
Mrs. Williams was a member of the last Duma and speaks
with the authority of an eye-witness and close observer. On pages 297-299
of her work: "There are few Russians among the Bolshevist wire-pullers,
i.e., few men imbued with the all-Russian culture and interests of the
Russian people. None of them have in any way been prominent in any stage
of former Russian life...Besides obvious foreigners, Bolshevism recruited
many adherents from among emigres, who had spent many years abroad. Some
of them had never been to Russia before. They especially numbered a great
many Jews. They spoke Russian badly. The nation over which they had seized
power was a stranger to them, and besides, they behaved as invaders in
a conquered country. Throughout the Revolution generally and Bolshevism
in particular, the Jews occupied a very influential position. This phenomenon
is both curious and complex. But the fact remains that such was the case
in the primarily elected Soviet (the famous trio Lieber, Dahn, Gotz), and
all the more so in the second one.
In the Soviet Republic all the committees and commissaries
were filled with Jews. They often changed their Jewish names for a Russian
one -- Trotsky (Bronstein), Kameneff (Rozenfeld), Zinovieff (Apfelbaum),
Stekloff (Nakhamkes), and so on. But such a masquerade deceived no one,
while the very pseudonyms of the commissaries only emphasized the international
or rather the alien character of Bolshevist rule...But, of course, there
were also Russians among the Bolsheviks-workmen, soldiers, peasants. Oulianoff-Lenin
is a Russian. Lunacharsky, Bonch-Bruevich, Mme. Colontai, Chicherin, all
these influential Bolshevist leaders are Russian by origin. But that predominant
class which very rapidly crystallized around the Bolsheviks was mainly
composed of individuals alien to the Russian people. This fact is probably
useful to them to keep control over the masses, for Bolshevist autocracy
is founded upon their absolute contempt of the people whom they rule. The
most terrible trait of Bolshevism is its utter unscrupulousness as to ways
and means, and the blunt cruelty of its leaders."
The Russian historian, D. Petrovsky, on page 37 of
his detailed history of the revolution, La Russie sous les Juifs (Russia
under the Jews) says that Lenin (Oulianoff) is one of a number of Russian
traitors, yet, on page 86 of the same work, he adds in a note: "Lenin is
commonly held to be a Russian, but the natives of Simbirsk are of a different
opinion. They relate that a convoy of prisoners traversed Simbirsk a good
many years ago. After the departure of the prisoners, a little boy remained
behind and was picked up and reared by a gentleman name Oulianoff.
Years after, a letter came, in ill-formed characters,
from the convict settlement, from a certain Ilko Sroul Goldman saying that
he had learned, as a result of lengthy inquiries, where his son was. He
asked for news of him. This Goldman was said to be Lenin's father. He never
Victor E. Marsden, who was for many years the Morning
Post's correspondent in Russia and who was present at the time of the Revolution
of 1917, wrote: "...Lenin is a half-blooded Jew, that is to say, the original
Ulianov who bore the name of Lenin was so, but there is ground to believe
that the present Lenin is impersonating that man who is dead and that the
actual Lenin of the Bolshevik business is what he looks, a full-blooded
Jew." (Jews in Russia, page 5)
In the same pamphlet there is a note added to the
lists of the names of the 447 Jews out of the 545 officials of the Soviet
Bureaucracy. The note says that it is doubtful if Lenin is Russian; that
he is Oulianoff by adoption but really a Jew, married to a Jewess and that
his children speak Yiddish. Thus though the consensus of opinion is in
favor of Lenin's Russian nationality, there is a certain element of doubt.
From this same pamphlet we read: "The Soviet movement
was a Jewish, and not a Russian conception. It was forced on Russian from
without, when, in 1917, German and German-American-Jew interests sent Lenin
and his associates into Russia, furnished with the wherewithal to bring
about the defection of the Russian armies...The Movement has never been
controlled by Russians.
a). Of the 224 revolutionaries who, in 1917, were
despatched to Russia with Lenin to foment the Bolshevik Revolution, 170
b). According to the Times of March, 29, 1919, 'of
the 20 or 30 commissaries or leaders who provide the central machinery
of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75 percent are Jews...among minor
officials the number is legion.'
According to official information from Russian, in
1920, out of 545 members of the Bolshevist Administration, 447 were Jews.
The number of official appointments bestowed upon Jews is entirely out
of proportion to their percentage in the State: The population of Soviet
Russia is officially given as 158,400,000 the Jewish section, according
to the Jewish Encyclopedia, being about 7,800,000. Yet, according to the
Jewish Chronicle of January 6, 1933: Over one-third of the Jews in Russia
have become officials."
On pages 93-94 of The Mystical Body of Christ in
the Modern World, a passage is quoted from Impressions of Soviet Russia,
by Charles Sarolea, Belgian Consul in Edinburg and Professor of French
Literature in the University of Edinburg, in which he says: "I am quite
ready to admit that the Jewish leaders are only a proportionately infinitesimal
fraction, even as the British rulers of India are an infinitesimal fraction.
But it is none the less true that those few Jewish
leaders are the masters of Russia, even as the fifteen hundred Anglo-Indian
Civil Servants are the masters of India. For any traveler in Russia to
deny such a truth would be to deny the evidence of his own senses. When
you find that out of a large number of important Foreign Office officials
whom you have met, all but two are Jews, you are entitled to say that the
Jews are running the Russian Foreign Office."
In the book by A.N. Field, which has already been
quoted from, we find, on pages 276-277, the following remarkable statements:
"Stalin, present ruler of Russia, is not a Jew, but took as his second
wife the twenty-one year old sister of the Jew, L.M. Kagonowitz, his right-hand
man, who has been spoken of as his probable or possible successor. Stalin's
every movement is made under Jewish eyes."
Central Committee of The Communist
According to the Defender (Wichita, Kansas) for February,
1936, the Central Committee of the Communist party in Moscow, the very
center of International Communism, consisted of 59 members, of whom 56
were Jews, and the other three were married to Jewesses.
The figures are found in several other journals as
well: Non-Jews married to Jewesses (3): L.V. Stalin, S.S. Lobow, V.V. Ossinsky.
Jews (56): V.V. Balitsky, K.J. Baumann, I.M. Vareikis, J.B. Gamarnik, I.I.
Egoff, I.A. Zelensky, I.D. Kabakoff, L.M. Kaganowitz, V.G. Knorin, M.M.
Litvinoff, I.E. Liobimos, D.Z. Manouilsky, I.P. Nossow, J.L. Piatakow,
I.O. Piatnitzky, M.O. Aazoumos, M.L. Ruchimovitch, K.V. Rindin, M.M. Houtaevitch,
M.S. Tchoudow, A.M. Schvernik, R.I. Eiche, G.G. Iagoda, I.E. Iakir, I.A.
Iakovlew, F.P. Griadinsky, G.N. Kaminsky, I.S. Unschlicht, A.S. Boulin,
M.I. Kalmanowitz, D.S. Beika, Zifrinovitch, Tratchter, Bitner, G. Kaner,
Leo Kirchman, A.K. Lepa, S.A. Lozovsky, B.P. Pozern, T.D. Deribass, K.K.
Strevsky, N.N. Popow, G.I. Blagonravow, A.P. Rosengolz, A.P. Serebrovsky,
A.M. Steingart, I.P. Bavolunovsky, G.I. Soklonikow, C.I. Broido, V.I. Polonsky,
Thus we are faced with the fact that: The Rulers
of Russia, are Jews, and they are applying to the world the doctrine of
Karl Marx (Mardochai). Marx, according to the Jewish writer, Bernard Lazare,
was: "...a clear and lucid Talmudist...full of that old Jewish materialism
which ever dreams of a paradise on earth and always rejects the hope held
out of the chance of a garden of Eden after Death."
Yes, it appears that Russia is changing and perhaps
going back to the system of the Christian Tzars. Certainly we haven't heard
the last of Communism. There are hundreds upon hundreds of millions of
Communists still active in the world. It appears, just appears, there just
might be a chance that white, Christian Russia is returning to Christianity
and old fashioned Imperial Tzarism.
Remember Lenin's admonition: "We advance through
retreat." The "apparent" demise of the Soviet Empire will speed the dismantling
of NATO; Western Europe's and America's military structures will be dismembered
in the new "era of peace, death of Communism, end of the Cold War and collapse
of the evil empire;" and the USSR's long-term goal of the neutralization
of their western flank, preparatory to the absorption of Western Europe
[politically, economically and militarily] will have been accomplished.
Agents of Revolution and The
Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion
Because of their importance and length, we have left
a study of the Protocols until last. We will not begin that study. Then
you make up your own mind as to their veracity and truthfulness.
Mrs. Webster, after having set forth the history
of the society, gives the answer in succinct fashion in World Revolution,
p. 181: "The Internationale, though itself an open and avowed association,
thus became, through the absorption of these existing secret societies,
a huge semi-secret society, that is to say, it formed the outer shell that
covered a ramification of conspiracies...of which the secrets were known
only to its middle-class directors. The anti-religious policy adopted by
the Internationale was the work of these secret influences."
For a full answer, however, it would be necessary
to study the careers of the Jewish founders of this society, Karl Marx
and Friedrich Engels. A few words must suffice here, but they will be enough
to show that many of the Gentile instruments, who figure as leaders, are
really the dupes of Jewish capitalism. Let us first examine Marx's formation
and his outlook on life.
Karl Marx was the grandson of a Jewish rabbin of
Cologne [Marx's real name was Mordechai]. As a young man, he entered the
society, founded by Ganz, Zunz and Moses Moser, and known as the Jewish
Union for Civilization and Science. The directing idea of this union was
that the Jewish nation, and not a member of that nation, WAS TO BE THE
MESSIAS WHO SHOULD CONQUER THE WORLD AND SUBJECT ALL NATIONS TO ITSELF.
Here is how one of Karl Marx's neo-Messianic correspondents
formulated the thesis: "THE JEWISH PEOPLE TAKEN COLLECTIVELY SHALL BE ITS
OWN MESSIAS. Their rule over the universe shall be obtained by welding
together the other races, thanks to the suppression of frontiers and monarchies,
which form the bulwark of national particularities. Thus shall be established
a Universal Republic...In this new organization of humanity, the Jews,
now scattered over the whole surface of the globe, all belonging to the
same race and molded by the same traditional formation, without however
forming a separate nationality, shall everywhere become the ruling element
without opposition. This will be particularly easy, if they succeed in
imposing on the masses of the working-classes the guidance of some of their
number. The governments of the nations forming the Universal or World Republic
shall all thus pass, without any effort, into Jewish hands, thanks to the
victory of the proletariat. Private property can then be suppressed by
the Jewish rulers who will be everywhere in charge of public affairs. Thus
shall the promise of the Talmud be realized that when the Messianic epoch
will have arrived the Jews shall have control of the wealth of the nations."