Following is a little more information for
you. Believe what you will I am only a watchman and I have given you warning
so your blood will be on your own head on the day of judgment not mine.
This material which is of Jewish origin is known as the Babylonian
Talmud (oral law) and Zohar (hidden mysteries/wisdom). And CONTRARY TO
THAT, WHICH IS COMMONLY TAUGHT THROUGHOUT CHRISTIANITY THAT THE TORAH (written
law, which consist of the five books of Moses, also known as the Pentateuch)
IS THE PRIMARY TEACHING OF JUDAISM IS A DELIBERATE DECEPTIVE LIE, THE TWO
ANCIENT JEWISH TEACHINGS (Babylonian Talmud and Zohar) ARE THE TRUE ESSENCE
OF JUDAISM. At the time of Christ, the Talmudic teachings, which were taught
by the Scribes and Pharisees, was known as the 'Traditions of the Elders'.
And the Zoharic teachings were then known as 'Merkabah.'
The rabbis of Judaism teach that Moses received three teachings
from God on Mount Sania. Which are, the written law (the Torah), the commandments
or oral law (the Talmud, Mishnah) and the hidden mysteries/wisdom (the
Zohar). Perspectively, the rabbi reads or recites passages from the Torah.
Talmud, on the other hand is the interpretation of the Torah.
And the Zohar is the hidden or deeper meaning of the Torah. In essence,
when a rabbi teaches Torah, he expounds from the Talmud. And when a rabbi
or an elite (Tzadik) of Judaism, Hassidic (ultra orthodox) want to understand
the deeper meaning of Torah, they study or contemplate Zohar.
The scope of these two ancient teachings is voluminous. Where
the Hebrew version of the Talmud encompasses 26 volumes and the English
translation known as the Soncino edition contains 16 volumes. And the Zohar
(which is also known as the 'Book of Splendor') is not as large as the
Talmudic work, but also is quite extensive with the English Soncino edition
covering 4 volumes.
Note, within the scope of this article it would be impossible
to expound on the teachings of the Talmud to great length. Notwithstanding,
it is my hope that from this article, the reader would at least ascertain
a key that could open the door to understanding the grandest of all the
hidden mysteries' of Satan. And more importantly, because a large percentage
of the New Testament writings warn us of these blasphemous teachings of
the Scribes and Pharisees (Rabbinical Judaism), it is also my hope that
the reader attain a greater understanding of the Truth which the Gospel
Prior to my present knowledge of the true teachings of Judaism,
I perceived Judaism as a religious body, who had failed to emulate the
teachings and writings of the Old Testament. However, from my own research
reviewing large segments from both the Talmud and Zohar writings, I now
know that my earlier perception of Judaism was immensely off based. In
other words, I now know that the Jews did not fail in their efforts to
live accordingly to the written law, instead what they did, by the Talmudic
teachings they rewrote God's commandments in such away and to such a degree
that God's commandments became corrupt and non effective. Also, I now have
a better understanding why Jesus was so adamant in declaring judgment and
condemnation upon the Scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees:
NKJV Luke 11:52; "Woe to you lawyers! For you have taken away
the key of knowledge. You did not enter in yourselves, and those who were
entering in you hindered."
KJV Matthew 16:6; Then Jesus said unto them, "Take heed and beware
of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."
In order to grasp the significance and depth of these heretical
teachings; let us examine excerpts from the Babylonian Talmud.
Note: Warning, the following material to some may be repulsive
and disillusioning. Nevertheless, as incredible and shocking it is, the
following are excerpts verbatim taken from my own private collection of
Soncino's English edition of the Babylonian Talmud.
Exodus 20:3; "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." Thus saith
Yet, Rabbi Says; Regarding Devotion to Other gods, There are Ways
that are Permissible "Mishnah. HE WHO GIVES OF HIS SEED TO MOLECH INCURS
NO PUNISHMENT UNLESS HE DELIVERS IT TO MOLECH AND CAUSES IT TO PASS THROUGH
THE FIRE. IF HE GAVE IT TO MOLECH BUT DID NOT CAUSE IT TO PASS THROUGH
THE FIRE, OR THE REVERSE, HE INCURS NO PENALTY, UNLESS HE DOES BOTH."
"GEMARA. The Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R.
Abin said: Our Mishnah is in accordance with the view that Molech worship
is not idolatry. For it has been taught, [if one causes his seed to pass
through the fire,] whether to Molech or to any other idol he is liable
[to death]. R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon said: If to Molech, he is liable;
if to another idol, he is not." (Talmud - Mas. Sanhedrin 64a)
Exodus 20:7; "Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God
in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name
in vain." Thus saith the LORD
Yet, Rabbi Says; If Your Anger is not Directed towards God, it
is Permissible to Profane God's name "For blasphemy is an indictable
offence only if it is mentally directed against God. If however, one reviles
the Divine Name, whilst mentally employing it to denote some other object,
he is not punished. Consequently, since the essence of the offence is mental,
the slight action is disregarded." (Footnote #17, Talmud Mas. Sanhedrin
Exodus 20:4; "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image,
or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the
earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:" Thus saith the
Yet, Rabbi Says; Only when the Last Stroke is made is the Thing
Considered an Idol "WHEN, HOWEVER, HE REACHES THE CUPOLA IN WHICH THE
IDOL IS PLACED [HE MUST NOT BUILD]. Said R. Eleazar in the name of R. Johanan:
If, however, he did build, the pay he received is permitted. This surely
is obvious: it is a case of appurtenances of idols, and appurtenances of
idols, whether according to R. Ishmael or according to R. Akiba, are not
forbidden till actually worshipped! Said R. Jeremiah: It is necessary
in the case of the idol itself. This would be right according to the one
who holds that [to derive any benefit from] the making of an idol for an
Israelite is forbidden forthwith, but from the making of one for an idolater,
not until it is worshipped. In that case this is very well; but according
to the one who holds that even when made for an idolater [any benefit]
is forbidden forthwith, what is there to be said?; But, said Rabbah
b. Ulla, the statement is necessary in regard to the last stroke of work;
for what is it that makes the idol fit for worship? It is its completion;
and when is the completion brought about? With the last stroke. But the
last stroke does not constitute the value of a perutah! Consequently, he
holds the opinion that the wage is earned from the beginning to the end
[of the work]." (Talmud - Mas. Avodah Zarah 19b)
Exodus 20:8-10; "Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Remember
the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all
thy work. But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it
thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant,
nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy
gates:" Thus saith the LORD
Yet, Rabbi Says; Only for the Purpose of Destruction, is work
Permissible during Sabbath "One is not liable for desecrating the Sabbath
when his work is destructive; but if he demolishes a house in order to
rebuild, it is regarded as constructive. Now, extinguishing a wick, thereby
destroying its light, is the equivalent of demolishing a house; if the
purpose is to save the wick to be used again later, it is analogous to
demolishing a house to build on the same site, since it is the wick which
is extinguished and the wick which is to be relit. But if the purpose is
to save the oil or the lamp, it is analogous to demolishing a house in
order to rebuild elsewhere, for whereas the wick is extinguished, it is
the oil or lamp that is saved for subsequent use." (footnote: Talmud -
Mas. Shabbath 31b).
Exodus 20:12; "Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days
may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee." Thus saith
Yet, Rabbi Says; It is Permissible to Strike Parents As long as
You do not Wound Them "Mishnah. He who strikes his father or his mother
is liable only if he wounds them. In this respect, cursing is more stringent
than smiting, for, he who curses [his parents] after death is liable, whilst
he who smites them after death is not." (Talmud Mas. Sanhedrin 85b)
Yet, Rabbi Says; it is Permissible to Curse Parents As long as
You do not use God's name "Mishnah. One who curses his father or his
mother is not punished unless he curses them by the divine name. If he
cursed them by an attribute, R. Meir held him liable, but the sages ruled
that he is exempt." (Talmud Mas. Sanhedrin 66a).
Exodus 20:13; "Thou shalt not kill." Thus saith the LORD
Yet, Rabbi Says; Only if the Assailant directly Caused the Death
is he Responsible "MISHNAH. THE FOLLOWING ARE DECAPITATED: A MURDERER,
AND THE INHABITANTS OF A SEDUCED CITY. A MURDERER WHO SLEW HIS FELLOW WITH
A STONE OR AN IRON, OR KEPT HIM DOWN UNDER WATER OR IN FIRE, SO THAT HE
COULD NOT ASCEND THENCE, IS EXECUTED. IF HE PUSHED HIM INTO WATER OR FIRE,
BUT SO THAT HE COULD ASCEND, YET HE DIED, HE IS FREE [FROM DEATH]. IF HE
SET ON A DOG OR A SNAKE AGAINST HIM [AND THEY KILLED HIM], HE IS FREE FROM
DEATH. BUT IF HE CAUSED A SNAKE TO BITE HIM [BY PUTTING HIS JAWS AGAINST
HIM] R. JUDAH RULED THAT HE IS EXECUTED; THE SAGES, THAT HE IS NOT."
"OR KEPT HIM DOWN UNDER WATER. The first clause teaches the extreme
limit of the law, and so does the last. Thus, the first clause teaches
the extreme limit of the law, that though he himself did not push him [into
the water], yet since he could not ascend, [through being held down], and
so died, he is executed. The last clause likewise teaches the extreme limit,
that though he actually pushed him into the water, yet since he could have
ascended, but died, he is free from death." (Talmud - Mas. Sanhedrin 76b)
"Raba said: If one bound his neighbor and he died of starvation,
he is not liable to execution. Raba also said: If he bound him in the sun,
and he died, or in a place of intense cold and he died, he is liable; but
if the sun was yet to appear, or the cold to make itself felt, he is not.
Raba also said: If he bound him before a lion, he is not liable: before
mosquitoes, [who stung him to death] he is. R. Ashi said: Even before mosquitoes,
he is not liable, because these go and others come." (Talmud - Mas. Sanhedrin
"It has been stated: If one overturned a vat upon a man [who then
died of suffocation], or broke open a ceiling above him, Raba and R.
Zera [differ]: One ruled that he is liable, the other that he is not. It
can be proved that it was Raba who ruled that he is not liable, for he
said: If one bound his neighbor and he dies of starvation, he is not liable."
"Raba said: If one thrust his neighbor into a pit, in which there
was a ladder [so that he could have climbed out], and then another came
and removed it, or even if himself hastened to remove it, he is not liable
[for the victim's death], because when he threw him in he could have climbed
out. Raba also said: If one shot an arrow at his neighbor, who was
holding a shield, but another came and snatched it away, or even if he
himself [the thrower] hastened to do so, he is not liable, because when
he shot the arrow its force was spent." (Talmud - Mas. Sanhedrin 77a)
"Our Rabbis taught: If ten men smote a man with ten staves, whether
simultaneously or successively, and he died, they are exempt. R. Judah
b. Bathyra said: If successively, the last is liable, because he struck
the actual death blow. R. Johanan said: Both derive [their rulings] from
the same verse, And he that killeth kol nefesh [lit., all life'] of man
shall surely be put to death. The Rabbis maintain that kol nefesh implies
the whole life; but R. Judah b. Bathyra holds that kol nefesh implies
whatever there is of life." (Talmud - Mas. Sanhedrin 78a)
"IF HE SET ON A DOG OR A SNAKE AGAINST HIM, etc."
"R. Aha b. Jacob said: If you will investigate [the grounds of
the dispute, you will learn that] in R. Judah's opinion the snake's poison
is lodged in its fangs, therefore, one who causes it to bite [by placing
its fangs against the victim's flesh] is decapitated, whilst the snake
itself is exempt. But in the view of the Sages the snake emits the poison
of its own accord; therefore the snake is stoned, whilst he who caused
it to bite is exempt." (Talmud - Mas. Sanhedrin 78a).
Exodus 20:14; "Thou shalt not commit adultery." Thus saith the
Yet, Rabbi Says; When a Woman has Sexual Intercourse with a Boy
the Degree of Wrong is as Being Injured by a Piece of Wood; "GEMARA.
Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up
woman makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood. When I
said it before Samuel he said: Injured by a piece of wood' does not apply
to flesh. Some teach this teaching by itself: [As to] a small boy who has
intercourse with a grown-up woman. Rab said, he makes her [as though she
were] injured by a piece of wood; whereas Samuel said: Injured by a piece
of wood' does not apply to flesh. R." (Talmud - Mas. Kethuboth 11b)
Yet, Rabbi Says; When a man has Intercourse with a Little Girl
it is Nothing "Raba said. It means this: When a grown-up man has intercourse
with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this,
it is as if one puts the finger into the eye; but when a small boy has
intercourse with a grown-up woman he makes her as a girl who is injured
by a piece of wood.' and [with regard to the case of] a girl injured by
a piece of wood.' itself, there is the difference of opinion between R.
Meir and the Sages." (Talmud - Mas. Kethuboth 11b)
Yet, Rabbi Says; A Little Girl must be Three Years Old to have
Intercourse; "An objection was raised: A girl of the age of three years
and even one of the age of two years and one day may be betrothed by intercourse;
so R. Meir. But the Sages say: Only one who is three years and one day
old." (Talmud - Mas. Nidah 44b)
Yet, Rabbi Says; If a Little Girl is Forced to have Intercourse
before She is Three, No Problem, on the Third Time it is as Though a Finger
Being Dipped in Honey; "Our Rabbis taught: A story is told of a certain
woman who came before R. Akiba and said to him, Master, intercourse has
been forced upon me when I was under three years of age; what is my position
towards the priesthood?' You are fit for the priesthood', he replied.
Master', she continued, I will give you a comparison; to what may the
incident be compared? To a babe whose finger was submerged in honey. The
first time and the second time he cries about it, but the third time he
sucks it'." (Talmud - Mas. Nidah 45a)
Intercourse with Animals..."This represents the view of R. Meir,
while Rab holds the same view as R. Eleazar. If [Rab holds the same view]
as R. Eleazar, what was the object of pointing to her previous carnal intercourse
when [her prohibition] could have been inferred from the fact that she
was a harlot, R. Eleazar having stated that an unmarried man who cohabited
with an unmarried woman with no matrimonial intention renders her thereby
R. Joseph replied: When, for instance, the woman was subjected
to intercourse with a beast, where the reason of previous carnal intercourse
may be applied but not that of harlot. Said Abaye to him: Whatever you
prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be'ulah she must also
be a harlot; and if she is not a harlot she cannot be a be'ulah either!
And were you to reply: This case is similar to that of a wounded woman,
[it may be pointed out] that if [the disqualification should be extended
to] unnatural intercourse also, you will find no woman eligible to marry
a [High Priest [since there is not one] who has not been in some way wounded
by a splinter! No, said R. Zera, in respect of a minor who made a declaration
Yet, Rabbi Says; A Women who had Intercourse with an Animal is
Eligible to Marry a Priest "R. Shimi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had
intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest. Likewise it was
taught: A woman who had intercourse with that which is no human being,
though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of stoning, is nevertheless
permitted to marry a priest."
"When R. Dimi came he related: It once happened at Haitalu that
while a young woman was sweeping the floor a village dog covered her from
the rear, and Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest. Samuel said: Even
a High Priest. But was there a High Priest in the days of Rabbi? Rather,
[Samuel meant]: Fit for a High Priest."
"Raba of Parzakaia said to R. Ashi: Whence is derived the following
statement which the Rabbis made: Harlotry is not applicable to bestial
intercourse? It is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot,
or the price of a dog, and yet we learned that the hire of a dog and the
price of a harlot are permitted because it is said, Even both these, two
only but not four." (Talmud - Mas. Yevamoth 59b).
Exodus 20:15; "Thou shalt not steal." Thus saith the LORD
Yet, Rabbi Says; "Scripturally, Only the Abduction of Human Beings
is to be Considered Stealing "R. Josiah said: From Thou shalt not steal.
R. Johanan said: From They shall not be sold as bondsmen. Now, there is
no dispute: one Master states the prohibition for stealing [i.e., abduction],
the other Master for selling [the kidnapped person]. "
"Our Rabbis taught: Thou shalt not steal; Scripture refers
to the stealing of human beings. You say, Scripture refers to the stealing
of human beings; but perhaps it is not so, the theft of property [lit.,
money'] being meant? I will tell you: Go forth and learn from the thirteen
principles whereby the Torah is interpreted. [one of which is that] a law
is interpreted by its general context: of what does the text speak? of
[crimes involving] capital punishment: hence this too refers [to a crime
involving] capital punishment."
"Another [Baraitha] taught: Ye shall not steal: The Writ refers
to theft of property. You say thus, but perhaps it is not so, Scripture
referring to the theft of human beings? I will tell you: Go forth and learn
from the thirteen principles whereby the Torah is interpreted,[one of which
that] a law is interpreted by its general context. Of what does the text
speak? of money matters; therefore this too refuse to a money [theft]."
(Talmud - Mas. Sanhedrin 86a)
"It was taught: R. phinehas b. Yair said that where there was
a danger of causing a profanation of the Name, even the retaining of a
lost article of a heathen is a crime. Samuel said: It is permissible, however,
to benefit by his mistake as in the case when Samuel once bought of a heathen
a golden bowl under the assumption of it being of copper for four zuz,
and also left him minus one zuz. R. Kahana once bought of a heathen a hundred
and twenty barrels which were supposed to be a hundred while he similarly
left him minus one zuz and said to him: See that I am relying upon you.'
Rabina together with a heathen bought a palm-tree to chop up [and divide].
He thereupon said to his attendant: Quick, bring to me the parts near to
the roots, for the heathen is interested only in the number [but not in
the quality]. R. Ashi was once walking on the road when he noticed branches
of vines outside a vineyard upon which ripe clusters of grapes were hanging.
He said to his attendant: Go and see, if they belong to a heathen bring
them to me, but if to an Israelite do not bring them to me.' The heathen
happened to be then sitting in the vineyard and thus overheard this conversation,
so he said to him: If of a heathen would they be permitted?' He replied:
A heathen is usually prepared to [dispose of his grapes and] accept payment,
whereas an Israelite is generally not prepared to [do so and] accept payment."
(Talmud - Mas. Baba Kama 113b).
Exodus 20:16; "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor."
Thus saith the LORD
Yet Rabbi Says; Burn the books of the Minim (pseudonym for Christians)
"The blank spaces and the Books of the Minim (Christians), we may
not save them from a fire. R. Jose said: On weekdays one must cut out the
Divine Names which they contain, hide them, and burn the rest. R. Tarfon
said: May I bury my son if I would not burn them together with their Divine
Names if they came to my hand. For even if one pursued me to slay me, or
a snake pursued me to bite me, I would enter a heathen Temple [for refuge],
but not the houses of these [people] (Christians), for the latter know
(of God] yet deny [Him], whereas the former are ignorant and deny [Him],
and of them the Writ saith, and behind the doors and the posts hast thou
set up thy memorial. R. Ishmael said: [One can reason] a minori: If in
order to make peace between man and wife the Torah decreed, Let my Name,
written in sanctity, be blotted out in water, these, who stir up jealousy,
enmity, and wrath between Israel and their Father in Heaven, how much more
so; and of them David said, Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee?
And am I not grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate then
with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies. And just as we may not
rescue them from a fire, so may we not rescue them from a collapse [of
debris] or from water or from anything that may destroy them" (alluding
to Christians). (Talmud - Mas. Shabbath 116a).
Exodus 20:17; "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou
shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant,
nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's." Saith
Yet Rabbi Says; It is Permissible to Steal a heathen's (Gentile)
Lost Property "R. Bibi b. Giddal said that R. Simeon the pious stated:
The robbery of a heathen is prohibited, though an article lost by him is
permissible. His robbery is prohibited, for R. Huna said: Whence do we
learn that the robbery of a heathen is prohibited? Because it says: And
thou shalt consume all the peoples that the Lord thy God shall deliver
unto thee'; only in the time [of war] when they were delivered in thy hand
[as enemies] this is permitted, whereas this is not so in the time [of
peace] when they are not delivered in thy hand [as enemies]. His lost article
is permissible, for R. Hama b. Guria said that Rab stated: Whence can we
learn that the lost article of a heathen is permissible? Because it says:
And with all lost thing of thy brother's: it is to your brother that you
make restoration, but you need not make restoration to a heathen. But why
not say that this applies only where the lost article has not yet come
into the possession of the finder, in which case he is under no obligation
to look round for it, whereas if it had already entered his possession,
why not say that he should return it. Said Rabina: And thou hast found
it surely implies that the lost article has already come into his possession."
(Talmud - Mas. Baba Kama 113b).
Rabbi Says, Heathens (Gentiles) are not Considered as Man, but
Instead are on a Level as Animals "
OR USES OIL OF ANOINTING. Our Rabbis
have taught: He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle or vessels is
not guilty; if over heathens or the dead, he is not guilty. The law relating
to cattle and vessels is right, for it is written: Upon the flesh of man
[adam] shall it not be poured; and cattle and vessels are not man. Also
with regard to the dead, [it is plausible] that he is exempt, since after
death one is called corpse and not man. But why is one exempt in the case
of heathens; are they not in the category of adam? No, it is written:
And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are adam [man]: Ye are called
adam but heathens are not called adam. But is it not written: And the
persons [adam] were sixteen thousand? Because it is used in opposition
to cattle. But is it not written: And should I not have pity on Nineveh
[that great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons [adam]?
This too is used in opposition to cattle. Or, if you wish, I might explain
it in the light of what a Tanna recited before R. Eleazar: Whosoever is
subject to the prohibition he shall not pour' is subject to [the law]
it shall not be poured [over him]'; but he who is not subject to he shall
not pour' is not subject to it shall not be poured [over him]'." (Talmud
- Mas. K'rithoth 6b).
Rabbi Says, Heathen's Prefer having Intercourse with Israelite
Cattle over Their Own Wives "Said Mar Ukba b. Hama: Because heathens
(Gentiles/Cutherans) frequent their neighbours' wives, and should one by
chance not find her in, and find the cattle there, he might use it immorally.
You may also say that even if he should find her in he might use the animal,
as a Master has said: Heathens prefer the cattle of Israelites to their
own wives, for R. Johanan said: When the serpent came unto Eve he infused
filthy lust into her. If that be so [the same should apply] also to Israel!
" (Talmud - Mas. Avodah Zarah 22b).
Note, the passages which follow are those which the Talmudic Rabbis
portray Jesus Christ. The pseudonym Balaam, is used in place of Jesus'
name. The reason the Jewish editors used the pseudonym is because of earlier
persecutions and censorship from the secular-Christian communities over
the past 2,000 years. Furthermore, it is extremely important to note that
even though the Talmud advocates a coming Messiah, the Messiah that is
advocated is not Jesus Christ but an entirely different Messiah.
I mentioned this because throughout Christendom today, many false
Judeo-Christian teachers are teaching that the Talmudic writings allude
to the coming Messiah. Yes, it is true that a Messiah is coming. However,
as Christians we are taught that the Messiah has come already, and the
next coming we await is His second coming. Therefore, since we are waiting
for Messiah's second coming, the Messia which the Talmud alludes to obviously
differs from the Messiah, Jesus Christ.
Rabbi Says, Jesus was a has-been Prophet that was Cursed by God,
Thereafter Lowered to the Status of Soothsayer "Balaam (Jesus)
also the son of Beor, the soothsayer, [did the children of Israel slay
with the sword].40 A soothsayer? But he was a prophet! R.
Johanan said: At first he was a prophet, but subsequently a soothsayer.41
R. Papa observed: This is what men say, She who was the descendant of
princes and governors, played the harlot with carpenters.'42"
(Talmud - Mas. Sanhedrin 106a) parenthesis mine
Sanhedrin 106a footnotes:
(40) Joshua XIII, 22.
(41) As a punishment for wishing to curse Israel he was degraded
from a prophet to a soothsayer.
(42) Shipdraggers,' (v. Rashi). Herford, Christianity in the
Talmud, p. 48, suggests that Balaam is frequently used in the Talmud as
a type for Jesus (v. also pp. 64-70). Though no name is mentioned to shew
which woman is meant, the mother of Jesus may be alluded to, which theory
is strengthened by the statement that she mated with a carpenter. (The
Munich MS. has rcd in the margin instead of hrcd, i.e., singular instead
Rabbi Says, regarding Talmud pseudonyms, Balaam alludes to Jesus,
and Considered anti-Christian "A certain min3 (Christian)
said to R. Hanina: Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was? He replied:
It is not actually stated, but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful
men shall not live out half their days,4 [it follows that] he
was thirty- three or thirty-four years old.5 He rejoined: Thou
hast said correctly; I personally have seen Balaam's Chronicle, in which
it is stated, Balaam (Jesus) the lame was thirty years old when Phinehas
the Robber killed him.'6 Mar, the son of Rabina, said to his
sons: In the case of all [those mentioned as having no portion in the future
world] you should not take [the Biblical passages dealing with them] to
expound them [to their discredit], excepting in the case of the wicked
Balaam (Jesus): whatever you find [written] about him, lecture upon it
[to his disadvantage]. (Talmud - Mas. Sanhedrin 106b) parenthesis
Sanhedrin 106b footnotes:
(3) Heretic, v. Glos.
(4) Ps. LV, 24.
(5) cf. p.471. n. 1.
(6) [According to the view that all the Balaam passages are anti-Christian
in tendency, Balaam being used as an alias for Jesus, Phinehas the Robber
is thus taken to represent Pontius Pilatus, and the Chronicle of Balaam
probably to denote a Gospel (v. Herford op. cit. 72ff.). This view is however
disputed by Bacher and others: cf. Ginzberg, Journal of Biblical Literature,
Rabbi converses with Onkelos, who allegedly via magical arts (altered
state of consciousness) spoke to Jesus in Hell "Onkelos son of Kolonikos
was the son of Titus's sister. He had a mind to convert himself to Judaism.
He went and raised Titus from the dead by magical arts, and asked him;
Who is most in repute in the [other] world? He replied: Israel. What then,
he said, about joining them? He said: Their observances are burdensome
and you will not be able to carry them out. Go and attack them in that
world and you will be at the top as it is written, Her adversaries are
become the head etc.; whoever harasses Israel becomes head. He asked him:..."
(Talmud - Mas. Gittin 56b)
Rabbi Says, Jesus is in Hell, Boiling in Semen Continuing
from Gittin 56b "...what is your punishment [in the other world]? He replied:
What decreed for myself. Every day my ashes are collected and sentence
is passed on me and I am burnt and my ashes are scattered over the seven
seas. He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He asked him: Who
is in repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said,
about joining them? He replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their
prosperity all thy days for ever.1 He then asked: What is your
punishment? He (Jesus) replied: With boiling hot semen.2 He
then went and raised by incantations the sinners of Israel.3
He asked them: Who is in repute in the other world? They replied: Israel.
What about joining them? They replied: Seek their welfare, seek not their
harm. Whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye. He said: What
is your punishment? They replied: With boiling hot excrement, since a Master
has said: Whoever mocks at the words of the Sages is punished with boiling
hot excrement. Observe the difference between the sinners of Israel and
the prophets of the other nations who worship idols. It has been taught:
Note from this incident how serious a thing it is to put a man to shame,
for God espoused the cause of Bar Kamza and destroyed His House and burnt
His Temple." (Talmud - Mas. Gittin 57a) parenthesis mine
Mas. Gittin 57a footnotes:
(1) Deut. XXIII, 7.
(2) Because he enticed Israel to go astray after the daughters
of Moab. V. Sanh. 106a.
(3) [MS.M. Jesus].
Author's note: The 'he' in item (2) is alluding to Jesus Christ..
From having read the above material, if I could tell you that
this material was no longer in vogue, you might find relief from the nauseous
feeling you may now have. Unfortunately that is not the case, for the Talmud
even in our modern times is still the most important learning aid in equipping
Jews who want to become rabbis, and the most popular study aid for any
Jew who feels the need to become acquainted with their religious roots
and heritage (Judaism).
However, do not take my word of the popularity and importance
of the Babylonian Talmud in modern day Jewry...! Yet, consider the words
of one of the most honored scholars in Israel today, Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz.
Who in 1988 received Israel's highest honor, 'The Israel Prize.' Adin Steinsaltz,
made the following statement in his book titled, 'The Essential Talmud'
page 3: "If the Bible is the cornerstone of Judaism, then the Talmud
is the central pillar, soaring up from the foundations and supporting the
entire spiritual and intellectual edifice. In many ways the Talmud is the
most important book in Jewish culture, the backbone of creativity and of
national life. No other work has had a comparable influence on the theory
and practice of Jewish life, shaping spiritual content and serving as a
guide to conduct."
A spiritual war between forces of darkness (Satan's devilish army)
and the forces of Light (God's Angelic army). The war is to determine
whether God's Truth will be proclaimed, or Satan's lies will continue to
hold many victims in bondage. Should God's Angels prevail, eyes will see
that could not see, and ears which could not hear will hear. Thus exposing
the lies, blasphemous writings and teachings which Satan began incorporating
into the religious belief system of God's chosen people, three thousand
years ago. Which encompass a total of 1500 years of compiling and formulating.
Lies that even from the beginning corrupted God's chosen people.
A Few Passages From The Talmud
Whenever someone who is not a Jew calls someone else
a Jew hater does so out of ignorance; for they know nothing about what
the Jews believe and teach exceptfor what some false Judeo-Christian preacher
or ministers tells them. Most of they know better but it pay more money
for them to lie to their people than to tell the truth. For if they are
truthful they are called every sort of name one can imagine by the children
Yet they will go along whith the Jew when he curses
the Judeo-Christian Savior Yeashua and cheers when the Jew curses those
who are called Christian. This too is done in ignorance and because they
are just too damn lazy to study to make themselves aproved of Yawhew. They
will sit on their collective pompus asses and cheer the Jew on thinking
they know something but in reality don't know anything. This is why Yahweh
says His people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; and that they do not
So when you hear some self rightious Judeo-Christian
cheering for the Jew remember the following because this is coming from
the Jewish Bible the Talmud.
BASHING, BIGOT, DEMOCRACY, GARBAGE, GRAMMAR, HATE, HATE SPEECH, HITLER,
IDIOT, INFLAMMATORY, INTOLERANT, KICK, LIBERTY, MIS-INFORMATION, MOB RULE,
NAZI, PHOBIC, PITY, PRAYING, RANT AND RAVE, REPETITIVE, RHETORIC, RIGHTS,
The very essence of government is fear, hate, bigotry, greed and jealously.
Government/law are all these factors backed up by threats and violence.
Because after any words/phrases have been twisted over and over, the
brainwashed can not accept the true meaning even after they know what it
The [I]n Famous Star of David
The Judeo-Christian world has been deceived
for many years about the Star of David being the everlasting sign of the
Jewish religion. Well, like most of their claims, this too is false. It
has been a sign of ZIONISM for about 100 years. As the following shows
Being amazed at this revelation on about the Kol Nidre, I happened
to notice in the index the "Star of David." So I decided to look it up
and see what the Jewish Encyclopedia had to say about it and found the
The "Sacred" Star of David: Non-Jews have been drenched with
propaganda that the six-pointed "Star of David" is a sacred symbol of Jewry,
dating from David and Solomon, in Biblical times, and signifying the pure
"monotheism" of the Jewish religion. In actuality, the six-pointed star,
called "David's Shield," or "Magen David," was only adopted as a Jewish
device in 1873, by the American Jewish Publication Society, it is not even
mentioned in rabbinical literature.
Magen Dawid ("David's Shield" - The Star of David): "The hexagram
formed by the combination of two equilateral triangles ; used as the symbol
of Judaism. It is placed upon synagogues, sacred vessels, and the like,
and was adopted as a device by the American Publication Society in 1873,
the Zionist Congress of Basel, hence by 'Die Welt (Vienna), the official
organ of Zionism, and by other bodies.
The hebra kaddisha of the Jewish community of Johannesburg, South
Africa, calls itself 'Hebra Kaddisha zum Rothn Magen David,' following
the designation of the 'red cross' societies...IT IS NOTEWORTHY, MOREOVER,
THAT THE SHIELD OF DAVID IS NOT MENTIONED IN RABBINICAL LITERATURE.
The 'Magen Dawid,' therefore, probably did
not originate within Rabbinism, the official and dominant Judaism for more
than 2,000 years. Nevertheless a David's shield has recently been noted
on a Jewish tombstone at Tarentum, in southern Italy, which may date as
early as the third century of the common era. The earliest Jewish literary
source which mentions it, the 'Eshkol ha-Kofer' of the karaite Judah Hadassi
(middle of the 12th cent.) says, inch. 242: 'Seven names of angels precede
the mezuzah: Michael, Garield, etc...Tetragrammation protect thee!
And likewise the sign called 'David's shield' is placed besides
the name of each angel.' It was therefore, at this time a sign on amulets.
In the magic papyri of antiquity, pentagrams, together with stars and other
signs, are frequently found on amulets bearing the Jewish names of God,
'Sabaoth,' 'Adonai,' 'Eloai,' and used to guard against fever and other
diseases. Curiously enough, only the pentacle appears, not the hexagram.
In the great magic papyrus at Paris and London there are twenty-two signs
sided by side, and a circle with twelve signs, but NEITHER A PENTACLE NOR
A HEXAGRAM (Wessely, i.e. pp. 31, 112), although there is a triangle, perhaps
in place of the latter.
In the many illustrations of amulets given
by Budge in his 'Egyptian Magic' (London, 1899) NOT A SINGLE PENTACLE OR
HEXAGRAM APPEARS. THE SYNCRETISM OF HELLENISTIC, JEWISH, AND COPTIC INFLUENCES
DID NOT THEREFORE, ORIGINATE THE SYMBOL. IT IS PROBABLE THAT IT WAS THE
CABALA THAT DERIVED THE SYMBOL FROM THE TEMPLARS. THE CABALA, IN FACT,
MAKES USE OF THIS SIGN, ARRANGING THE TEN SEFIROT, or spheres, in it, and
placing in on AMULETS. The pentagram, called Solomon's seal, is also used
as a talisman, and HENRY THINKS THAT THE HINDUS DERIVED IT FROM THE SEMITES
[Here is another case where the Jews admit they are not Semites. Can you
not see it? The Jew Henry thinks it was derived originally FROM THE SEMITES!
Here is a Jew admitting that THE JEWS ARE NOT SEMITES!] ('Magic dans l'lude
Antique,' p. 93, Paris, 1904), although the name by no means proves the
Jewish or Semitic origin of the sign. The Hindus likewise employed the
hexagram as a means of protection, and as such it is mentioned in the earliest
source, quoted above. In the synagogues, perhaps, it took the place of
the mezuzah, and the name 'SHIELD OF DAVID' MAY HAVE BEEN GIVEN IT IN VIRTUE
OF ITS PROTECTIVE POWERS. The hexagram may have been employed originally
also as an architectural ornament on synagogues, as it is, for example,
on the cathedrals of Brandenburg and Stendal, and on the Marktkirche at
A pentacle in this form, (a five pointed star
is shown here), is found on the ancient synagogue at Tell Hum. Charles
IV, prescribed for the Jews of Prague, in 1354, A RED FLAG WITH BOTH DAVID'S
SHIELD AND SOLOMON'S SEAL, WHILE THE RED FLAG WITH WHICH THE JEWS MET KING
MATTHIAS OF HUNGARY in the fifteenth century showed two pentacles with
two golden stars. The pentacle, therefore, may also have been used among
the Jews. It occurs in a manuscript as early as the year 1073. However,
the six-pointed star has been used for centuries for magic amulets and
cabalistic sorcery." (See pages 548, 549 and 550 of the Jewish Encyclopedia)
The so-called Star of David is the Jewish idol
Remphan which the ancient Israelites took up as an idol also and angered
God by doing so.
The Kol Nidre
I have read posts where the person doing the
posting said "I many Jewish friends." Or "My best friend is a Jew." or
something of the sort. This would be funny if it were not so sad. A person
who is not a Jew HAS NO JEW AS A FRIEND; they are only friendly to that
person because he or she has something they want, or they can get something
they want. And it matters not whether they believe this or not.
If a Jew gives his word, promises something,
and etc., they have an escape clause already enacted. For on their day
of atonement the very FIRST prayer they pray is the Kol Nidre which is
If you have ever had any business dealings with the Jews you probably
noticed that they very seldom kept their word, even a written contract,
in the business you conducted with them. Well the reason that their word
is not worth a plug nickel, so-to-speak, is because of the Kol Nidre Oath
they take every year when they celebrate the Day of Atonement. (Of course
this does not apply to the Judeo-Christians as they do not dare take notice
of such things, or they will be cursed by the Jews god Lucifer.
Kol Nidre: It is the prologue of the Day of Atonement services
in the synagogues. It is recited three times by the standing congregation
in concert with chanting rabbis at the alter. After the recital of the
"Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer the Day of Atonement religious ceremonies
follow immediately. The Day of Atonement religious observances are the
highest holy days of the "Jews" and are celebrated as such throughout the
The official translation into English of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows)
prayer is as follows: "ALL VOWS, OBLIGATIONS, OATHS, ANATHEMAS, whether
called 'konam,' 'konas,' or by any other name, WHICH WE MAY VOW, OR SWEAR,
OR PLEDGE, OR WHEREBY WE MAY BE BOUND, FROM THIS DAY OF ATONEMENT UNTO
THE NEXT, (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. MAY THEY BE DEEMED
ABSOLVED, FORGIVEN, ANNULLED, AND VOID AND MADE OF NO EFFECT; THEY SHALL
NOT BIND US NOR HAVE POWER OVER US. THE VOWS SHALL NOT BE RECKONED VOWS;
THE OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBLIGATORY; NOR THE OATHS BE OATHS."
The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the "Kol Nidre"
(All Vows) prayer are referred to in the Talmud in the Book of Nedarim,
23a-23b as follows: "And he who desires that NONE OF HIS VOWS MADE DURING
THE YEAR SHALL BE VALID, let him stand at the beginning of the year and
declare, EVERY VOW WHICH I MAKE IN THE FUTURE SHALL BE NULL (1). (HIS VOWS
ARE THEN INVALID) PROVIDING THAT HE REMEMBERS THIS AT THE TIME OF THE VOW."
(Emphasis in original) A footnote (1) relates: "(1)...THE LAW OF REVOCATION
IN ADVANCE WAS NOT MADE PUBLIC." (Emphasis in original text)
The greatest study of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was made
by Theodor Reik, a pupil of the [I]nfamous Jewish Dr. Sigmund Freud. The
analysis of the historic, religious and psychological background of the
"Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer by Professor Reik presents the Talmud in
its true perspective. This study is contained in "The Ritual, Psycho-Analytical
Studies." In the chapter on the Talmud, page 163, he states: "THE TEXT
WAS TO THE EFFECT THAT ALL OATHS WHICH BELIEVERS TAKE BETWEEN ONE DAY OF
ATONEMENT AND THE NEXT DAY OF ATONEMENT ARE DECLARED INVALID."
The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that the "Kol Nidre"
(All Vows) prayer has no spiritual value as might be believed because it
is recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement as the prologue of the
religious ceremonies which follow it. The SECULAR significance of the "Kol
Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is forcefully indicated by the analysis in Vol.
VI, page 441: "The Kol Nidre HAS NOTHING WHATEVER TO DO WITH THE ACTUAL
IDEA OF THE DAY OF ATONEMENT...it attained to extraordinary solemnity and
popularity by reason of the fact that it was THE FIRST PRAYER RECITED ON
THIS HOLIEST OF DAYS."
Message About Jews
I have received several e-mails saying that what I said about the Jews
was not very good and that it just gives the enemy some ammo. Well excuse
me but it doesn't seem very
hard for the enemy to have ammot to sling at our brother and sister
Israelites. No the dogs dig around in the garbage and get enough fecees
on themselves to scatter it pretty good.
Its time for people who claim to be Christian to
strike back and stop sitting back and licking their wounds and crying oh
the dirty enemy they just don't understand me. Yes
they do understand you they know that you have accepted the lying propaganda
that they have instituted into the Judeo-Christian church world about a
Christian must suffer
all things at the hands of the enemy and not strike back. This is false
teaching and has nothing to do with real life that Yeashua talked about.
He took the whip to the Jews in the temple
and drove them out didn't He. Is that an act of pacificism? I think not
that is getting ones belly full of their lying crap and doing something
Over 100 million Christians have been murdered
by the Jews in this century alone while the Judeo-Christians sit like pious
fools in their church pulpits and singing "I'll
Fly Away." While millions of their brother and sisters were being tortured
in the most hedious ways these hypocrites sat and sang about something
that will never happen.
Someone made a comparison with Benjamim Freedman,
who, one of the very very few Jews who actually converted to Christianity.
There is no comparison between him, whom I believe to have really been
an Israelite and so were his parents who had accepted Judaism for some
reason or other, and were not really Jews. Now some will say that makes
no sense but then I don't make much sense some of the time when
I get to thinking about what these animals have done to our brother
and sister Israelites and get mad about it.
"Thanks to the terrible power of our International
Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have
a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make
more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews' Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat
on Christian wars. Over 100-MILLION CHRISTIANS HAVE BEEN SWEPT OFF THE
FACE OF THE EARTH BY WARS, AND THE END IS NOT YET." (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking
at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah,
1869, Henry Ford also noted that: 'It was a Jew who said, 'Wars are
the Jews' harvest'; but no harvest is so rich as civil wars.' The International
Jew: The World's Foremost
Problem, Vol. III, p. 180).
The Jews laugh and spit in our faces and we
are supposed to simply lick it off and thank them for their generosity?
I say no a thousand times no. You do that if you
want, but I will not, if I can do nothing else I will cry out to Yawhew
to curse them and their children after them.
So think what you will of me for saying these
things. I could say many more, but I would revert back to my old ways when
I was in the oil fields, driving a truck, and working on a ranch and you
would really be upset at the language that would come forth. So I will
end with this at the present time. If you love the enemy so much then
perhaps you should join with them and curse your brothers and sisters
they will pay you hansomely and praise you and then when they have drained
everything out of you they will slip you some arsnic or some other poison
which will kill you without the stupid masses knowing what happend. Or
one of their doctors will kill you in the hospital.
And whether anyone believes it or not I remain
In His Service,
From the Mail:
I used to write grants and got a lot of publications that listed corporations
and the grants they funded....I WAS FINALLY SICKENED BY THE HUGE NUMBERS
OF GRANTS AND DOLLARS available ONLY for jews and minorities.
Ditto for AIDS research. SO MUCH MORE is given to these groups
and for these causes that it would boggle your mind! If you are white and
heterosexual...FORGET IT! And now Bill Gates gives that STUPIFYING amount....ONLY
for minorities. If THAT is not blatant discrimination, I don't know what
He might be too rich to hurt in the pocketbook....but I haven't even
heard any complaints in the PC media...from any 'disenfranchised white
folks'. We SHOULD at least register our complaints, that NEEDY, BRIGHT
WHITE STUDENTS might need some help to go to college, too. But he
says this huge grant is for "The leaders of tomorrows world"... evidently
they are all to be minorities....not white.