Communism - Part 41
Three top Communist defectors have all said virtually the same
thing. General Jan Sejna, former Soviet Bloc military officer, Ion Pacepa,
a KGB man, and Anatoliy Golitsyn another KGB man. In fact, Golitsyn in
his book Red Horizons says that the overall aim of Soviet policy is to:
"Bring about a major and irreversible shift in the balance of world power
in favor of the Soviet Bloc as a preliminary to...a world-wide federation
of Communist States...Western acceptance of the new liberalization as genuine
would create favorable conditions for the fulfillment of Communist strategy
for USA and Western Europe."
Restructuring and Renaming the Communist Party of the Soviet Union:
The CPSU has 20 million members and another 45 million members in its Lenin
youth organization Komosomol (Komsomol is a youth organization with members
from the Red Army, the KGB, the Red Navy, the Air Force, and a majority
of the young factory workers). The CPSU has grown top heavy and inefficient
with bureaucratic deadweight. It is about to be reorganized, restructured,
trimmed in size (or purged) to increase its efficiency, and Renamed. It
is Not going to be Abolished as Gorbachev, Bush, and the Soviet and Western
Press keep telling us.
It should be remembered that the Communist Party of the Soviet
Union has undergone a number of metamorphoses in name: At its inception,
it was called the Bund. Then it was renamed the Russian Social Democratic
Worker's Party. In 1912, following an internal feud, it split into the
Bolsheviks and Mensheviks (the "big ones" and the "little ones"). The big
ones ate the little ones. The name then became the Russian Social Democratic
Workers Party of Bolsheviks. In 1918, it became the Russian Communist Party
(Bolshevik). In 1925, the name was changed again to the All-Soviet Communist
Party of the Soviet Union, which it has remained until the present. It
is now about to be renamed again (probably to the Social Democratic Party).
Each of these name changes was accompanied by major fanfare, "absolute
proof that the communists had completely changed," and the declaration
that all the political, economic, and repressive evils had been perpetrated
by the Previous Party, but that the new party would be benign, democratic,
freedom loving, etc. In reality, all of the old evils continued under the
new, revamped party, nothing changed! The present name change will not
alter any of the principles or the goals of the CPSU.
Each of the major Communist party name changes under Lenin and
Stalin were accompanied by Massive purges (called "party rejuvenation")
to streamline the organization and bring it under formidable discipline.
Millions of Russian Communists went to the wall or the gulag in those purges.
Today's CPSU has become fat, dumb, lazy, careless, apathetic,
and passive, and is ten times larger than during WW II. It has lost sight
of its goal, it has become diluted, and will probably be trimmed by several
million members. This is not abolition of the Party, it is reorganization,
restructuring, and Strengthening of the Party.
The Communists believe that Americans and most Westerners are
shallow, superficial, gullible, and easily seduced by media-generated illusions.
Hence, if they change the name of one of their fronts or parties, and declare
the old organization to be dead, most Westerners will believe it. For decades
they have routinely changed the names of their Communist front organizations
in this manner. They just renamed the Communist Party of Italy, now calling
it the Democratic Party. In Poland, the renamed the Communist Party (which
was called the Polish United Workers Party) to the Social Democratic Party.
In Romania, they renamed the old Rumanian Communist Party, calling the
new party the New Salvation Front. In none of those cases, (or many others)
did they really abolish those Communist parties. They simply renamed, reorganized
and restructured the parties, while gullible naive Westerners believed
the charade. It has been said, "a rose by any other name, is still a rose."
Calling the CPSU the Social Democratic Party (to some such name) will not
alter the fact that it is the same old CPSU with a new label and some new
Today, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union operates through
elected representatives, the Politburo, and the Central Committee. The
Central Committee of the CPSU (made up of 300-450 members) wields the real
power in the USSR, and an inner circle of about 100 members really call
the shots. These Central Committee members dominate the military and the
KGB, as well as the "visible" politicians such as Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Shevardnaze
and the various cabinet ministers. Gorbachev is simply an actor, an employee
who is implementing the policy laid down by the Central Committee since
the early '80s when they (and the KGB) drafted the script for the actions
taking place today.
The new refurbished, renamed Communist party was discussed at
length at the CPSU's XXVIIth and XXVth Congress in '86 and '90. Gorbachev
described the "new party" as: "A Party of Socialist Choice and Communist
Perspective...A party adhering to humanistic ideals common to all mankind...intolerant
of chauvinism, nationalism, racism, and any manifestation of Reactionary
Ideology and obscurantism...A Party confirming the independence of Communist
parties of the Union republics...A Party open for contacts, Co-Actions
with the Communists, Social Democrats and Socialists of various countries."
Reading the "new Party" profile as conceived by the CPSU leadership,
it is clear that the only difference between the "old Party" and the "new
Party" is in the new one's wide acceptance of all revolutionary movements
throughout the world.
Socialism To Be Substituted For Communism
"The concept, the main idea, lies in the fact that we want to
give a New Lease on Life to Socialism through perestroika and to reveal
the potential of the socialist system." (Mikhail Gorbachev, October 1989)
Then in December of 1989 Gorbachev stated: "Today we have perestroika,
the Salvation of Socialism, giving it a second breath, revealing everything
good which is in the system."
The word "socialism" will be substituted for "Communism" and latter
will be almost completely stricken from the Communist's vocabulary. From
Lenin to Gorbachev, the Communists have used the two words inter-changeably.
Socialism, as defined by Karl Marx in the Communist Manifesto, is what
has been imposed on the peoples of the USSR, China, Cuba, etc.
Socialism, as the stepping stone to the final utopian goal of
Communism, involves abolition of private property, draconian political
and financial regulations and controls on the people, huge heritage, a
monopolistic central bank, central control of education, and state control
of the family, children, religion, etc. That sounds a little bit like America
in 1991, does it not? If you are like most Americans, you probably wonder
why the so-called Right Wing is constantly saying that the United States
has become a Communist Nation. Well the following from Northpoint Tactical
Teams, P.O. Box 129, Topton, North Carolina 28781 tells it best, in our
Americans, have been watching the degeneration of their society,
the increase in violence, drugs, pornography, and the fanatical rise in
the national debt, and asks what will we do when America falls into Socialism,
Communism, insolvency and surrender. Well, make no mistake about it, the
Thought-theology of what we understand is Communism (Judism) HAS taken
over in America. It is not called by that name however, it is called Socialism.
The Hammer and Sickle does not adorn our flag, but we are under the control
of Communism just as surely as there is a God in Heaven and that Jesus
Christ sits at His right hand.
In June '91, Yeltsin (promising "swift moves to establish greater
democracy and market economics") was elected (in the first-ever such election)
President of the Russian Republic, which has 150-million of the Soviet
Union's 285-million people. (He has since assumed near dictatorial powers).
Following that election the Western press enthusiastically described Yeltsin
as "Bigger Than Life, The Russian People Love Him." His image, readability,
and standing in the West went into orbit as he APPEARED to "stand in the
gap" against the hard-line "gang of eight" coup perpetrators during the
recent August coup/counter-coup drama. As he "appeared" to stand off the
entire Soviet Army and KGB almost single- handedly, the Western media and
public opinion went ballistic. Americans were barraged with articles with
typical headlines such as: "The Right Stuff: Yeltsin Joins the Ranks of
Robin Hood, Moses, and Churchill." (This will be difficult for many to
believe, one can hear them say, what:, England do that to this country?
Why they are our greatest ally, we could not do without them. Let us look
at the record and see just how much love there is for us in this pretended
friendship. To begin with, when we were at war with Spain, this great Churchill,
"Churchill entered British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces and
fired on the American forces. It was a little embarrassing when the Honorable
William Langer of North Dadota made this announcement on the floor of the
United States Senate. Mr. Churchill was in this country, because you know,
we never hit a man behind his back, he was going to speak in Boston, a
little more of the Churchillian propaganda. Learning that this statement
had been made by the patriotic Senator Langer, Mr. Churchill was a little
upset, he sent a telegram to the Honorable Tom Connally denying the fact.
Good Friend, as he was, Senator Connally rose to his feet and read the
telegram to the Senate.
Little did they realize that the records were available, that
already these facts had been read to the Senate and were in the Congressional
Record. Once again Senator Langer read the record to the Senate. Mr. Churchill
is a brilliant man, but how stupid to try to deny what he has sanctioned
in his biography, for you will find the record in World's Who's Who and
a very good account in International Who's Who. The preface to these books
states "This volume contains an authentic record of notable men and women
throughout the world, page 114, 1940 edition: 'Winston Churchill...He entered
the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces against the American
forces in Cuba."
Communism - Part 42
International Who's Who, page 158, published by Europe Publications
Ltd. London, 39 Belford Square, W.C. 1 the 13th edition, states: "Churchill
entered the army in 1895, served in Cuba with Spanish forces against the
Americans. The preface in this book states, 'We wish to express our thanks
to all those who, by completing questionnaires or by correcting proofs
sent to them have enabled us to bring information up to date and to remind
others that unless proofs are returned, no responsibility can be accepted
for the accuracy of their biographical records."
In 1946, the Biographical Encyclopedia of the World repeats: "Churchill
entered the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces in Cuba."
Webster's Biographical Dictionary, 1st edition by G. & C Merriam, publishers,
Springfield, Mass., also states that "Churchill served in Cuba with the
Spanish forces." Current Biography, 1940 edition, published by H.W. Wilson
Co., 950 University Avenue, New York City also states: "Churchill: He was
with the Spanish forces in Cuba." It was repeated in 1942. It is here that
we find Churchill quoted: "He had always thought it a pity that it all
had to be so make believe, and that the age of wars between civilized nations
had come to an end forever, now he, at least had an opportunity to join
civilized Spain in a war against uncivilized Cuba." Robert's account of
Winston Churchill, 1928, Robert H. McBride, publishers, page 32, through
Sir Henry Drummond, ambassador at Madrid, (Spain) Churchill: He joined
the Spanish forces in Cuba in 1895. Spain conferred the 'Order of Military
Merit, 1st class.'"
While the New York Times, which prints "all the news that is fit
to print," in their issue of September 19, 1945 states: "Churchill fought
with Spain in Cuba." (And Men Wept, by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin))
Why Was Boris Yeltsin Not Neutralized?
The TV news commentators would have us believe that hard-liners
staged a coup to oust Gorbachev and revert to the old style Communist government
but, because of the democratic forces already unleashed in the USSR and
the courage of the people, the coup failed.
But, one major fact does not fit into that theory and that fact
is Yeltsin. The two key figures promoting change in the Soviet Union are
Gorbachev, who wants moderately paced change, and Yeltsin who wants the
rate of change to greatly speeded up. In recent months, many have accused
Gorbachev of sacking reformers and putting representatives of the old guard
in positions of power. Some, including Yeltsin, have gone as far as to
suggest that, in this way, he laid the foundation for the coup.
Now, if the coup was genuine, surely the hard-liners would have
silenced the two key reformers, Gorbachev and Yeltsin. The very fact that
Yeltsin was not neutralized shows that either the coup was badly bungled
or it was designed to fail! Why was Yeltsin able to communicate with the
outside world from his besieged White House, and through a host of TV and
other journalists, for the full three days of the coup?
Why was it not possible to cut the phone lines at the pole outside
the building, or jam the radio communications? If Yeltsin had been silenced,
there would have been no rallying point in Moscow and the world would not
have been glued to their TV sets. The rapid and radical restructuring that
followed the collapse of the coup is another indication that it was planned
to fail! No, the coup leaders were mere front men who were used by the
faceless, behind-the-scenes plotters who planned the coup to fail.
Yeltsin's "thinking" is reflected in speeches he has made at the
XXVIth and XXVIIth Party Congresses of the CPSU where he highly praised
the tremendous strivings of the CPSU as well as the monumental advancements
and great successes of the Soviet Union. As he said at the first of those
Party Congresses: "Today we find the mighty productive forces which
poises our society, the wealth supplied to the Soviet people by unfettered
socialism. And all of this is the result of a wise collective brain, titanic
work, unbreakable will, and the unsurpassable organizational talent of
the Communist Party and its Central Committee and Politburo...Under the
Leadership of the Central Committee, our party and the State have actually
continued to lead in the hard rebuttal of the aggressive machinations of
Imperialism (i.e. America). The Communists and all the workers or the Sverdlovsk
Central Committee (headed by Yeltsin until 4/85) assure the Congress delegates
and Lenin's Central Committee that they will fight with their entire revolutionary
fervor and give unswerving dedication tot he cause of the Communist Party."
In July '90, the Kremlin script called for Yeltsin to resign from
the Communist Party (as Shevardnadze and Gorbachev have now done) and Yeltsin
is now referred to as a "Non-Communist Reformer." Yes, but he is still
a hardcore Marxist-Leninist Revolutionary, an important distinction. At
this writing he has become almost a total dictator over the Russian Republic
(with its 150-million population). Yeltsin, like Gorbachev, Shevardnadze,
and the reform (liberal) wing of the Communist Party, is totally dedicated
to perestroika (a restructuring and reorganization of the Communist Party
and the Soviet Union from top to bottom). Yeltsin is for purging hundreds
of thousands of bureaucrats, aparatchiks, and the Nomenclature (the privileged
one), not to terminate Communism, but to accelerate its thrust toward World
Domination. He would go even further and faster than Gorbachev, hence the
"alleged" rivalry between the two. Yeltsin is not against Gorbachev, nor
against Communism. He is against the entrenched bureaucracy (and the stagnation
it has begotten) which he and Gorbachev believe is self-serving, bloated,
and slowing down the Communist's timetable for world revolution.
When Yeltsin and Gorbachev talk about a multi-party system in
the Soviet Union, they are talking about multiple Communist Parties all
functioning within the Communist System. Hence, Yeltsin's pronouncement
to found a new party "to the left" of the Communists. It will be anti-free
enterprise, anti-capitalist, and hard-core Marxist- Leninist, but will
use all the terminology of free markets, democracy, etc. In Russian politics
and theater, there is the concept of the "liar" and the "liar's helper."
Gorbachev is the liar, Yeltsin is the "liar's helper."
Gorbachev, Shevardnadze, and Yeltsin are all actors in a dramatic
stage play (like Hamlet or King Lear). The Soviets organize their politics
according to a well-developed scenario which sometimes includes the death
or permanent exist of the main hero. It helps to understand the plot, to
understand the position and relationship among the actors, as well as the
intended influence or impact upon the audience, the world. Nothing in the
Soviet Union is accidental; the words, the stage, the violins, or the plot.
The three actors described above are all reform minded, Liberal
Marxist-Leninists (on the same side) with their handlers in the Central
Committee of the CPSU, the KGB and the Soviet Military orchestrating the
plot, its pace, and each new twist in the plot (i.e. the recent phoney
coup/counter-coup, the termination, actually the renaming, of the Communist
Party of the Soviet Union, the KGB and the USSR itself. Just as Western
audiences are fascinated by the next episode of TV's "Dallas," so the Kremlin
leaders plan to mesmerize and manipulate the West with the next act of
Soviet political theater.
The Ultimate Goal: To convince the West that Communism has collapsed
in the USSR, that democracy has arrived, that massive U.S. (and Western)
aid and disarmament should follow, and the integration of East and West
(starting with Europe) should occur, by the mid-to late 1990s. There is
word that the big three actors described above will be joined by others.
Watch another rising star, Alexander Yakovlev, a close confidant of Gorbachev
Communism - Part 43
Vladimir Lenin in 1921 stated: "Telling the truth is a bourgeois
prejudice. Deception, on the other hand, is often justified by the goal."
The present Soviet leadership has developed history's most comprehensive
and Machiavellian plan to destabilize the West and defeat it through systematic
The Soviets have learned that the American People have a very
short attention span; are easily seduced by Media-Generated illusion; find
it easier to believe words (when pronounced with "sincerity") than deeds,
even when the deeds contradict the words; and find it difficult to detect
camouflage and deception.
The Soviet leaders are presently creating The Illusion of peace,
the death of Communism, the breakup of the empire, the demilitarization
of the Soviet Union, democracy in the USSR, friendship with the West (and
perhaps even economic collapse), while planning and perpetrating exactly
To facilitate this strategy of deception, the Soviet leaders (primarily
via the KGB) utilize disinformation, the deliberate false portrayal of
the true conditions and practices of the Communist World to elicit desired
reactions from the non-Communist World.
In periods of true weakness and crisis within the Communist world,
the carefully crafted image is one of aggressive strength and expansion,
and all Communist practice is geared to create that image. In periods of
actual strength and solidarity within the Communist leadership, the system
is portrayed as weak, struggling, transitional and open to cooperation
with the Western family of nations.
To wage ideological war against the West, Soviet disinformation-propaganda
specialists concentrate on two kinds of studies. One is the study of Western
people and their psychology. The other consists of developing a working
method of using unnoticeable, subliminal propaganda for achieving victory
in ideological, political and economic areas. The Soviets have mastered
the art of telling Americans what they want to hear and making it believable!
The Disinformation Network
The Soviets have tens of thousands of KGB agents world-wide devoted
specifically to disinformation and propaganda in the world media. Of tens
of thousands of KGB agents in America, James Tyson in Target America estimates
that about 2,000 function within the U.S. media. Tass, the Soviet official
news (disinformation) agency, has bureaus in 126 countries, staffed almost
exclusively by the KGB.
The Novosti Press Agency has 3,000 employees around the world
(mostly KGB) who feed information and reports into 4,000 information services
worldwide. Novosti publishes thousands of books, 24 illustrated magazine
(in 45 languages) in foreign countries around the world (12 in India alone).
Novosti publishes magazines and newspapers (printed in Libya) in 32 different
African countries and distributes millions of copies of books, newspapers
and magazines in Europe and North America.
The Soviets know that the best dissemination of propaganda lies
in supplying properly edited TV news reels and newspaper galley proofs
to Western media outlets. Westerners in turn are impressed that glasnost
"allows" this and eagerly transmit or publish everything with no thought
or question as to the validity of the material.
The Tass News Agency is the outlet on which all the world relies
for its information about the Soviet Union. Tass produces tens of thousands
of Communiqu�s, magazine and news articles, programs and commentaries
each year, which appear to be unbiased and objective, but which are in
fact clever, sophisticated disinformation or propaganda pushing the present
Soviet thinking, strategy, or manipulations. These are in turn fed into
tens of thousands of Western and Third World media outlets and reach an
audience of billions of unsuspecting people worldwide.
This disinformation is virtually always what the Western (especially
the American) audience wants to hear. Presently it dwells on the collapse
of the Soviet economy, the dissolution of Communist parties, chaos in Eastern
Europe, the end of communist regimes, the dissolution of the Soviet empire,
etc. It is noteworthy that there is almost a total absence of any information
on the Soviet Military. This is not by accident!!!
Are the Soviets understating their economy as part of their "Feigned
weakness/get Western Aid" Disinformation campaign?
Statistics from a 1988 Soviet publication of world statistics
comparing Soviet and U.S. production in a number of areas show amazing
Soviet Economic Strength in a number of areas, strength that runs completely
counter to all appearances that the USSR is a total economic basketcase.
A few examples of Soviet versus American production numbers are worthy
of reflection: Overall production is 80% of America's; crude oil production,
140%; natural gas production, 139% of America's; cast iron, 286%; steel,
214%; iron ore, 504%; mineral fertilizers, 162%; tractor units, 463%; cement,
168%; cotton fabrics, 293%; woolen fabrics, 515%; universities and colleges,
83%; number of physicians, 218%; beds in hospitals, 369%. The Soviet grain
production have been vastly Understated.
We have been led to believe that the Soviets are technical-industrial-
financial buffoons. But more than half of the engineers in the world live
in the Soviet Union. The average Soviet university graduate is far better
educated than the average U.S. university graduate today, something most
Americas would not like to admit. The Soviets produce 2 1/2 to 3 times
more world patents per year than Americans. They already have a powerhouse
based on "plasma" (not blood), a self-generating powerhouse like the sun.
The Soviets built the first nuclear power plant. Chernobyl happened
because it was Much Older than our nuclear power plants. The Soviets built
the world's first nuclear powered icebreaker in the 1950s. They are presently
deploying a Star Wars-type space-based defense system that America has
chosen not to build. They have an operational space station in outer space,
for military purposes. America cannot afford to put one up. They have an
operational rocket that lifts a 100-ton payload into outer space versus
a 32-ton maximum rocket payload America can lift (a 3 to 1 edge in lifting
capacity). they have built the largest military air transport in the world,
far larger than America's C5A Galaxy. They even developed America's favorite
video game, Nintendo.
They build a nuclear submarine worth $3-billion a copy every six
weeks that is as good as any American can turn out. Their weapons industry
is 5-10 times the size of our own, turns out weapons that in many instances
are as sophisticated as ours and in 5 to 6 times the quantity of our own.
In areas where they are technologically behind America, they beg, borrow,
steal or are given by the West what they need.
Financially they may not be the incompetents we perceive them
to be either, in that they always best us price wise on large commodities
deals, they are actually very sophisticated market operators (or manipulators).
When they sell gold (as the world's third largest producer) they
sell into strength to maximize their profits. The Soviet economy is actually
less vulnerable to the coming depression in the West than our own because
they do not have a huge internal debt pyramid to collapse as we do (America's
is 15 trillion and rising). Most Soviet debt is international, owed to
Communism - Part 44
Furthermore, a major deflationary economic (or price) collapse
in the Soviet Union is unlikely because the government owns everything
and controls all prices. People will not be dumping assets or investments
to get liquid, they don't own any! The Soviets are not major exporters,
they consume most of their production. But they are major importers, and
import prices will drop sharply in a depression. The Soviet Economy will
be relatively insulated from a Western Global Depression.
What's The Point? Sun Tsu, the Chinese military strategist (whom
the Soviet leaders idolize) said: "When at your pinnacle of strength,
feign weakness." The Soviets May Not Be at their pinnacle of economic
strength (they never have been) but neither are they the economic basket-case
or technical/industrial/financial incompetents which Soviet disinformation
portrays them to be.
As a few of the above facts would seem to indicate, they may be
far stronger economically, industrially, technologically and scientifically
than we have been led to believe. One highly respected Soviet-born Sovietologist
believes that the primary motive behind the Soviets seeking massive Western
financial aid is Not need, as much as the desire to destroy the fragile
U.S. and Western economies by over stretching our resources. A hundred
billion or more in international loans to the USSR suddenly defaulted upon
could also help to precipitate a financial collapse in the West.
The Soviets Are, however, at their pinnacle of military strength
(their current "seeming" political upheaval notwithstanding) and that strength
versus the West's is growing every day. General Douglas MacArthur once
said: "...it is most dangerous to underestimate your enemy." Is it
possible that the Soviet disinformation and Western gullibility about the
true conditions in the USSR is causing America and the West to dangerously
underestimate Soviet military, industrial, and technical strength and to
overestimate our own? Are the Soviets carefully crafting the "buffoon"
image? Are they really "dumb like foxes?"
One good rule for Soviet watchers when considering Soviet disinformation
is to assume that almost everything is the opposite of what it appears
to be. Another rule to remember is, that if you own the guns, you still
own the country!
The Soviet Pseudo Coup - Soviet Theater
at its Best
On Monday, August 19, Mikhail Gorbachev was ostensibly overthrown
in a so-called coup by military, KGB and Communist Party "hardliners" not
satisfied with the results of his glasnost/perestroika reform program.
Within three days, the coup fell apart, the eight coup leaders were arrested,
and Gorbachev was restored to power.
While the Communist and world press as well as Bush and other
Western leaders trumpeted the genuineness of the coup and counter/coup,
as has been previously shown in part, There were some very strange aspects
to the entire affair that cause many to conclude that the coup was staged:
1). The U.S. and world press warned about the coming coup for
several days leading up to August 19. Seldom is the World Press given advance
notice of such events. Western intelligence sources knew of the coup several
months in advance. Also curious was the fact that in spite of the advance
publicity of the coup, Gorbachev made no moves to head it off or avert
2). All of the eight coup leaders were Gorbachev appointees and
3). Coup leader Gennady Yanayev referred to himself only as "acting
president" and spoke of Gorbachev returning to power after recovering from
4). The coup leaders did not cut the internal or international
communication lines, something which is always done in a coup or revolutionary
5). The coup leaders made no attempt to control the press, neither
the Soviet nor the foreign press stationed in Russia, which had complete
access to international phone lines throughout the coup.
6). Anti-coup leaders such as Yeltsin had access to International
Phone Lines and Operators throughout the coup.
7). Only a minimal number of troops were used throughout the coup,
and troops loyal to Yeltsin were sent to surround Yeltsin in the Parliament
8). The airports were all left open.
9). Water, electricity and phone lines in the Parliament building
were never cut.
10). In a legitimate coup, the KGB would have killed Yeltson,
Gorbachev and other reform leaders. But no attempt was even made to arrest
Yeltsin, but the coup plotters did arrest Godiyan, a well-known enemy of
The president of Soviet Georgia came out shortly after the coup
and accused Gorbachev of having master-minded it, and 62% of the Soviet
people (according to private polls) believe the coup was a fake. Even Eduard
Shevardnadze (Gorbachev's former foreign minister) said that Gorby may
have been behind the coup. It is certain that Gorbachev and the Soviet
Leadership had much to gain from a pseudo or staged coup:
1). If Gorbachev could be seen as wrestling control of the nation
from reactionaries and restoring constitutional authority, his popularity
and legitimacy among the people might rise.
2). It was hoped that the coup and counter coup would quiet the
restive Soviet people, holding out hope for improvement of their living
3). The coup and counter-coup would raise the credibility of the
Soviet reform-Democracy-Glasnost-Perestroika movement in Western eyes,
opening up the flood gates for even more financial and high tech aid. The
Bush's of the world could say: "See, our good friend Gorbachev and the
Soviet forces of democracy just 'dodged the hardliner's bullet,' now we
really have to help them if we want to see democracy and reform succeed
4). The coup was to remind the West how wonderful Gorby really
is. He was losing credibility due to his huge military buildup, his killing
of people in the Baltics, etc. After the coup, he could blame all these
indiscretions on the "hardliners."
5). The "restoration of democracy" to the Soviet Union and the
"demise of the hardliners" is now an excuse for the West to accelerate
its disarmament and for the globalists in America, Europe, and the Soviet
Union to accelerate the merger into the New World Order.
6). The coup and counter-coup are an excuse to launch a long overdue
purge of hundreds of thousands of inefficient Communist Party, KGB or Government
Bureaucrats, tens of thousands of whom will be shot or imprisoned. And
without notice by the controlled press in America. This purging (or cleansing)
of the Party has been done periodically since 1917. It is like pruning
a grape vine or (fig tree) rose bush to make it stronger. A huge Communist
Party Purge is now underway in the Soviet Union.
7). The coup and counter-coup would be the excuse for reorganizing
and renaming the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the KGB and the USSR
itself. This strategy of reorganizing, restructuring, and streamlining
the Soviet Union from top to bottom has been on the drawing boards for
several years. Under the impetus (or smoke-screen) of the coup and counter-coup,
this restructuring will now be done in one huge quantum jump.
8). Another goal of the coup/counter-coup was to raise Boris Yeltsin
to "superstar status" so that he could be thrust into leadership of the
people did not rally around Gorbachev. Soviet theater always has an understudy
for the star ready to be brought on state at a moment's notice!
Communism - Part 45
It appears that the eight leaders of the coup (Kryuchkov, Yazov,
Pavlov, Pugo, Yanayev, Baklanov, Starodubtsev and Tizyakov) were enticed
into setting up the coup (which they may have believed was genuine). They
were set up, entrapped and then double-crossed. Pugo is said to have committed
suicide, but was more likely murdered. The remaining seven will be tried,
imprisoned or shot. This is the Communist way, to double-cross and liquidate
their own top leadership when they deem it necessary or desirable! They
overthrew and killed Trotsky (in Mexico); they purged and executed Bukharin
(Lenin's closest associate and a "hero of the Revolution") in 1936 because
he would not support Stalin's perestroika in '36 and '37; and they executed
Beria (head of the NKVD) in 1956. Dryuchkov and friends may well suffer
a similar fate, sacrificed for the long-term good of the Party. And the
sacrifice of Kryuchkov, Yazov, Pugo, Pavlov, etc. (who apparently walked
into a trap) lends immense credibility to the whole Coup-Counter-Coup Scheme.
Historical Precedent: There are numerous precedents for purges,
duplicity, double-crosses, and brutal executions in Soviet history since
1917. But there is also a precedent for a pseudo-coup in Russian history
in 1564 when Ivan the Terrible was Czar. Ivan became distraught over his
inability to remake Russia in his image. The ruling class (the old guard)
tried to thwart him at every turn.
Ivan also believed that the ruling class had murdered (poisoned)
his wife Anastasia. So, he packed up as if to go on his vacation, and once
he reached his destination, he sent word to the ruling class elite that
he was abdicating the throne. This sent a shockwave of fear through the
ruling class. The peasants would revolt and they would not get any help
from Ivan's merchant class followers. So they sent word to Ivan, "come
back, please!" He replied, "I will, but on MY conditions." they thought
about and then decided it was the lesser of evils. Ivan returned to the
throne and he renewed his reform efforts with much less resistance from
the ruling class.
Note: One thing seems to have gone wrong with the phony coup/counter-coup.
The Soviet people were supposed to rally around Gorbachev. They did not!
Many saw through the charade, and most would simply not forgive his six
years of despotism. So, it could become advantageous to move Yeltsin and/or
Shevardnaze to center stage. But remember, both are hardcore Marxist-Leninists
cut out of the same cloth as Gorbachev. As the French proverb says, "the
more it changes, the more it remains the same."
Reorganizing and Restructuring the Soviet Empire: "We are not
going to change Soviet power, of course, or abandon its fundamental principles,
but we acknowledge the need for changes that will strengthen Socialism."
(M. Gorbachev, Perestroika)
The Western media has been filled with headlines over the post
month that the Soviet Empire is disintegrating, that Communism and socialism
are abandoned and dead at last, that the Communist Party of the Soviet
Union and the KGB are being dismantled, disbanded and relegated to the
"dust bin of history." Certainly the demise of the "gang of eight," the
rise of Yeltsin to power, the official condemnation of the CPSU and KGB,
and the independence of many of the Soviet republics would all seem to
signal the end of the "evil empire." But looks can be deceptive and so
can the Marxist-Leninist dialectic.
The Soviet Empire is Not Disintegrating as the Western press and
leaders keep telling us. It is restructuring, rearranging, reorganizing,
streamlining, purging the deadwood, and rearming preparatory to its final
thrust for world domination over the next five to ten years. As Gorbachev
said in 1989: "Through restructuring (perestroika) we want to give Socialism
a second wind. To achieve this, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union
returns to the origins and principles of the Bolshevik Revolution, to the
Leninist ideas about the construction of a new society."
And in 1987 Gorbachev said: "In October 1917, we parted with the
old world, rejecting it once and for all. We are moving toward a new world,
the world of Communism. We shall never turn off that road."
Does this sound like a man who is presiding over the death of
Communism? The Lenin whom Gorbachev worships, quoting Sun Tsu, said: "We
advance through retreat...when we are weak, we boast of strength, and when
we are strong, we feign weakness."
The old dialectic Leninist doctrine of taking two steps forward
and then one back to confuse your enemies is certainly being applied by
his disciple, Gorbachev, today. It is called "scientific socialism" by
the faithful, and of course Gorbachev has said that he does not want to
discard socialism but renew, restructure and strengthen it. It should be
remembered that all present changes in the Soviet Union are within the
framework of Socialism.
Abolishing The Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the KGB:
The Soviets are Not abolishing the CPSU or the KGB, they are renaming them,
reorganizing them, purging them of inefficient deadwood, and Expanding
1). The KGB: Has had six name changes since 1917:
The KGB: Has Had
Six Name Changes Since 1917
All of these name changes were accompanied by purges (where thousands
of heads at the top rolled), by restructuring or reorganization, by an
expansion of the role of the secret police and by public pronouncements
that the secret police had been abolished.
In the 1950s Beria, the brutal and infamous head the NKVD, was
purged and executed. Vladimir Kryuchkov (head of the KGB until the recent
phoney coup and counter-coup) has similarly been removed and will probably
be shot to make the coup-counter-coup seem more genuine.
The KGB has about 1.5 million members worldwide, with about 50,000
sequestered in the U.S. KGB military units will now be moved under the
Soviet army command (the new KGB will fall under the Soviet military command),
and tens of thousands of inefficient KGB bureaucrats will be sacked (or
This is not being done to destroy the KGB but to make it stronger,
more efficient, lean and mean so-to-speak. It was seen to be becoming fat,
dumb, lazy, and bloated. Just as the Rumanian secret police, the Securitate
(which was 50,000 strong under Ceausescu) continues to operate in a Romania
which is allegedly non-Communist, but still is dominated by the Communists,
so the KGB will continue to function in the USSR, which will be allegedly
non-Communist, but still dominated by the Communists.
Russia Is Still Controlled By The Jews
If we dig a little deeper we further confirm the conclusion that
the power behind the Kremlin is still Jewish. We must also understand that
it was Jewish personnel who built the Soviet bureaucracy. It is theirs.
Opinion Magazine, published by the late Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, a Zionist
leader, stated in its December, 1933 issue that 61 percent of the officials
of the White Russian bureaucracy (which was the major section of the bureaucracy)
were Jews. ("...A Jew is commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Army; a Jew
is President of the State Bank; Jews occupy almost all important ambassadorial
positions of the Soviet Union; the universities, professions, judiciary
and administration have now a greater percentage of Jews, than any other
nationality." The rabbi's magazine added: "Anti-Semitism has been declared
a state offense and is punished as counter-revolution (with death).")
Drew Middleton, back from Moscow after years there as the New
York Times correspondent, had a long article in the New York (and Los Angeles)
Times in February, 1948, in which he said that only then had the Kremlin
begun admitting as many non-Jews as Jews to the professional schools for
training for positions in the bureaucracy. Analyze that statement. It means
that even today half or more than half of all employees in the bureaucracy
are Jews; in a land where Jews constitute less than three percent of the
The bureaucracy, the secret-police, the press, the finance, the
policy shaping and policy executing machinery; all are Jewish creations
and the Jews look on them as their private possession. If any force in
Russia were to threaten to rip them loose form this political and military
power machine the Jews would call for help from all over the world. In
America their kinsmen would storm the radio, television, movies, newspapers,
magazines and every other media outlet, to inflame Americans against what
would be described as the "anti-Semitic," "fascist" Russians. If the threat
in Russia became serious a civil war would break out there. For the Jews
have the Red bear by the tail, and they have beaten and kicked all the
Christian sentiment and tolerance out of it; never again will they dare
turn loose of its tail. If they ever lose their grip they will be wiped
out, and they are keenly conscious of this fact.
Communism - Part 46
No, there has been no serious loss of power by the Jews in the
land of the "people's democracy." Such a loss as they have suffered has
been only in the nature of compromises with the rising tide of anti-Semitism,
in a time when the imminence of war makes it inadvisable to liquidate more
millions of Russians. The compromises were some what illustrated years
ago by the Truman administration of Henry Morgenthau, as a political expediency,
soon after the war, when Americanism began to rise.
The very highest offices and most powerful concealed positions
are held by Jews or men married to Jews. For instance the early names you
are probably familiar with were Rakosi who ruled Hungary, Ana Pauker ruled
Roumania, Slansky ruled Czechoslovakia, Ashberg was the banker; Kaganovich
was the dictator over all the vast industrial cities of slave labor.
These Were The Rulers: John Gunther, for years friendly to the
left wing and granted interviews with the highest Communists, wrote in
his "Behind the Curtain," 1949: "...(Rakosi) is in a way the most interesting
personality I met all summer. His name is Matyas Rakosi, he is the Deputy
Prime Minister and undisputed boss of Hungary...one of the most efficient
and diabolically subtle as well as thorough-minded men I ever met...Rakosi
is not merely a Hungarian Communist; his is one of the half dozen most
important international Communists in the world today, because of his prestige
and influence almost everywhere in the Soviet orbit, from Moscow to Pieping.
Mr. Rakosi was born in 1892, in a Hungarian village called Ada; he is of
Jewish origin and the family name was Rosencranz..."
Reports from numerous sources within the past have told of the
Jewish character of the secret police and the bureaus, and of the government
corporations by which the ruling clique took all business from the Hungarians,
eliminating competition. This trend illustrated what appears to be the
final development if Communism should sweep the world: all non-Jewish competitors
would be eliminated, the state owning everything, setting up gigantic corporations
with its preferred people in charge, the International Bankers manipulating
the finance. Communism thus becomes Zionist, or Jewish state capitalism.
Which we can see being formed in America today. We found also in Communist
Hungary that while Protestants and Catholics have suffered severe persecution
under Jewish rule, the rabbis carry on without interference. Many observers,
including some Jews, have reported that rabbis and synagogues were never
disturbed in Communist Russia. While it was prohibited to teach religion
to young people, the Jews did so by their home worship.
"The Communists are against religion (Christianity), and they
seek to destroy religion; yet, when we look deeper into the nature of Communism,
we see that it is essential nothing else than a religion (Judaism)." (A
Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 138)
The Jewishness of Ana Pauker and her triumph over the Rumanians
were told in Time Magazine: "...(Ana Pauker) lives in three great houses,
moving almost every night because she fears assassins." One of her houses
belonged to Prince Brancoveanu. One belonged to Nicolae Malaxa, a big industrialist
and speculator. And one belonged to the red-haired Magada Lupescu, ex-King
Carol's mistress and later his wife.
"Ana replaced them all. The power of the aristocrats, the industrialists,
the royal playboys and the royal concubines has passed into her hands.
She runs Roumania...Her sway extends beyond Romania's 92,000 square miles
and its 16.5 million people. She is the leading Communist in the band of
states running from the Baltic to the Adriatic...Ana Pauker was born (1893)
in Bucharest, where her father, Zvi Rabinsohn, i.e, the man who kills animals
in accordance with Jewish rules (Ana's father moved to Palestine after
the war)...ana went to the Jewish school on Anton Pan Street...
Through seven huge Sovroms (Soviet-Romanian combines) the Russians
almost completely control transport, oil, timber, banking and everything
else they can lay their hands on, even including Roumania's tiny motion
picture industry...A recent visitor described Bucharest as a 'city with
the air of a pawnshop.'" (Time Magazine, September 20, 1948)
How could the Time writer have made his point more plain? How
is it possible for Americans not see what they read? (A person shopping
in a Jewish store for books exposing the Jewish revolutions against our
people, asked the sales lady why she would sell such books to non-Jews.
She said without hesitation, "Goyim don't see what they read.") Here was
the full picture of the triumph of the Jew over the Rumanians, ousting
their king, their industrial leaders, even their little store owners, wiping
out all competition, killing the Christian leaders, intimidating and suppressing
the thunder-struck, frightened people; yet how many Time readers realized
that it was a Jewish triumph? Small wonder the Jewish strategists speak
of us as the "stupid goyim." "Gunther's Behind the Curtain" confirmed that
Slansky, secretary-general of the Communist Party in Czechoslovakia, is
Jewish. Gunther described him as the strong man of that country.
Was Stalin Jewish? Jacob Berman a former secretary-general of
the Polish Communist Party and the dictator over "liberated" Poland. (When
Berman became the strong-man over Poland, Walter Winchell made the announcement
on his Sunday evening propaganda broadcast. The statement stood entirely
alone, without explanation. It seemed that his purpose in making the announcement
was to inform his enormous Jewish radio audience that their kinsmen had
triumphed over the hated, intensely-Christian Poles. His boastful announcement
was safe, for not one White American in a thousand suspected the racial
identity of Berman (or even Walter Winchell, for that matter)) In July,
1950, both Jewish and general-circulation newspapers carried stories that
|Marshal Konstantin Rokossovsky, who was put in charge of Police operations
some months earlier, was anti-Semitic and "reportedly" had removed Berman
and also from East Germany, Gerhardt Eisler, with several other high Jewish
But a subsequent dispatch in some Jewish papers said that these Jews "reportedly"
had been called back to Moscow. Note that both series of reports, the original
and the later, qualifying reports, were given as hearsay. Robert Williams
questioned a number of non-Jewish readers and found that all who saw the
article had the impression that there was some mistreatment of Jews behind
the Iron Curtain. It is so easy for the strategists, using their infiltrees
into the press and radio, to make our people believe what they want us
to believe, especially since we are virtually unable to reply with the
full facts in this land which idealizes (sic) freedom of the press.
It seems probable that this is no more than the long expected
move to make the Poles and Germans feel that Communism is losing its Jewishness.
Germany is the balance of power between the East and the West; the Communists
must have Germany if they are to conquer the world. Therefore thy may go
to great lengths, even liquidating a few conspicuous Jews, or reporting
them liquidated, even risking the temporary bafflement and defection of
the Jewish masses in the West; in order to deceive and win the Germans.
Later they can easily win back the Jewish masses. It worked perfectly,
as we know from our study of history over the past few decades. Meanwhile,
of course Berman and Eisler was able to issue orders to their respective
charges from Moscow as readily as Eisler issued orders for all Communist
operations in the Western Hemisphere from a hideout in New York City. (A
month after the original propaganda stores appeared, the name of Eisler
came through in news dispatches from Europe in connection with Communist
operating in East Germany; but one may wonder whether this mention, in
small type, erased the impression in the mind of the American people, who
even bothered to notice, that Jews were being mistreated by Rokossovsky)
In Russia proper the two most powerful front men, Stalin and Molotov,
were married to Jewesses. Stalin's wife (his third) was the sister of Kaganovich,
the Jewish Commissar of Heavy Industries and dictator over all the great
industrial cities of slave labor. (It has been estimated that |Kaganovich
worked 15 to 20 million non-Jews. He employed many of his kinsmen in his
bureaucracy, but he does not enslave Jews) There was increasing suspicion
that Stalin himself was Jewish. He had always been considered a Semitic-Mongoloid
mixture, perhaps non-Jewish. Many Jews, however, believed him to be one
of them, and a columnist in the Los Angeles B'nai B'rith Messenger, March
3, 1950, col. 2, p. 5 wrote: "A former Soviet general claims that Joseph
Stalin is of Jewish ancestry."
Many White Russians who fled the Bolsheviki say Stalin was a Jew.
One, a captain in the Czar's armies, stated that he knew Stalin in their
boyhood and that Stalin's father (Djugashvili) was "a Jewish cobbler."
Communism - Part 47
Molotov's wife was the sister of Sam Karp (The name is often misspelled
Carp) of Karp Export and Import Co., Bridgeport, Conn. Molotov's daughter,
therefore, is a Jew (for a half-Jew is a Jew). Molotov will not turn against
his own daughter, unless absolutely necessary.
Mr. Ashberg, who was known throughout the banking world as a Jewish
financier at the Nia Banken in Sweden before the Bolshevik Revolution,
and was reported by Edgar Sisson as having arrive in Russia two months
after the successful "October Revolution," remained in Russia and was the
banker for the U.S.S.R. The London Evening Star reported a visit by Ashberg
to Switzerland: "...for secret meetings with Swiss government officials
and banking executives. Diplomatic circles describe Mr. Ashberg as 'the
Soviet Banker' who advanced large sums to Lenin and Trotsky in 1917. At
the time of the revolution, Mr. Ashberg gave Trotsky money to form and
equip the first unit of the Red Army. A spokesman of the Soviet Legation
in Berne said 'Mr. Ashberg's visit will be private. He has property in
The financial attach� of the Soviet Legation described
Mr. Ashberg as 'the most unusual man the Kremlin has ever sent to the West.
He bears no official title, is attached to no government department, is
not in the Soviet Foreign Service and is not a member of the Cominform.'"
Note that Banker/Communist Ashberg was even permitted to own property,
and in a capitalist nation. Non-Jewish bankers; competitors of Jewish finance,
were liquidated as capitalists soon after the revolution. Hardly anyone
in the Soviet apparatus is more powerful than the banker. Hardly any Communist
is more influential than Rakosi, Ana Pauker, Stalin or Molotov; all Jews
or married to Jews. It need hardly be reiterated, therefore, that no power
as yet has seriously threatened the Jews behind the Kremlin. They still
manage what their spokesman chose to call the "huge flock of Russian sheep"
and it is still the racial element which makes Communism so destructive
to the Russians.
Zionism and the Anti-Defamation League - The Secret Government
of the United States: Three past eminent Jews, Senator Herbert H. Lehman
(Banker/Zionist Lehman promoted a fantastic movement called Crusade for
Freedom, which enlisted many good men and many old time Communist Hard
Liners, such as the Jewish movie producer, Walter Wanger (put in charge
of the Los Angeles division). A spokesman said the organization had no
intention of opposing the Truman-Acheson policies. Drew Pearson was plugging
it over radio. Obviously it was a deceptive move, not really bent on combatting
Communism. What it contemplated was the building of five huge short-wave
propaganda stations in Europe and Asia. In the hands of International Banker
Lehman and associated Communists, this gigantic project moved the masses
of Europe and Asia to please its planners. Lehman's spokesmen, for example,
were able to keep Russian troops from surrendering en masses to our armies
by merely making them believe that the Kremlin had turned against Jews,
while Jews in America live like kings. If the long-oppressed Russians believed
the Kremlin at last was on their side against Jewish power, they would
fight to the death for Russia. If they ever find out how powerfully and
dangerously entrenched the Jewish revolutionaries were in America, they
would not dare surrender to our armies. After all, it was American troops
who, under New Deal orders, forcibly drove back to Russian police, several
million Russian refugees just after the war. Russians have not forgotten
this mass crime.
If Lehman's Crusade for Freedom had not been broken up it would
have sweeped the world like a hurricane, adding the final triumph of the
world revolution, through a "United Nations World Government," a dictatorship
by a handful of men responsible to no one. this Crusade was promoting the
naive, power-minded and Jewish Eisenhower, who evidently was marked to
become the first dictator, or figurehead. The Board of the UN would perhaps
(and does today) be such men as Banker Ashberg of the USSR, Banker Lehman
and Strategist Frankfurter, Zionist Ben Gurion from Israel, Rakoski from
the Communist International and James P. Warburg who is promoting and helping
finance the United World Federalists (whose uncle helped finance Trotsky).
The Crusade is a private international machine. Why will the government
permit it to rise and take over the business of propaganda from the military?
Is there any doubt that the Jewish plans have almost succeeded
in the United States today?), International Banker, Mr. Justice Felix Frankfurter
of the United States Supreme Court and Mr. Henry Morgenthau, Jr., former
Secretary of the Treasury, were pictured on page one of the Chicago Tribune,
May 29, 1950, with the statement: "A person with highest State Department
connections identified these three figures as the secret government of
the United States. Frankfurter was pictured as the most powerful man in
the government, reaching into the White House with his proteges." David
K. Niles, a Marxist formerly associated with Frankfurter and the late English
Jewish revolutionary, Harold Laski, at Ford Hall Fourm in Boston, was named
as "administrative assistant at the White House. Niles owes his government
connection to Frankfurter."
It was Mr. Morgenthau who, inspired by his assistant in the Treasury
Department, the late Harry Dexter White, born Weitt, sold the Morgenthau
plan to Roosevelt and Eisenhower. This plan was to keep on destroying Germans,
principally by the starvation process, after the fighting stopped. About
one million German soldiers were starved to death under the orders of the
Jewish American President Dwight Eisenhower. It made the German hate America
so violently that it is now a question whether we can expect them to help
us in a time of need. Evidently Mr. white and Mr. Morgenthaou wanted to
make the German people hate us so that they would side with Communist Russia
at some point in the future.
Morgenthau also, gave a set of U.S. occupation money dies to the
Communist Army in 1944, after which the U.S. Treasury had to redeem hundreds
of millions of dollars worth of occupation marks, indistinguishable from
our own civilians, including thousands of Jews who were sent into the U.S.
zone for political purposes.
These Jewish strategists are not known as Communists; they are
known as Zionists. They even mouth anti-Russian sentiments, as the pressure
grows. But do not be fooled: they and the scores of Jewish organizations
across the nation which they influence, whose vote and propaganda power
throughout the press and radio gave them the support needed condemn the
House Committee on un-American Activities, condemn loyalty oaths, condemn
as anti-Semites and reactionaries and hate-spreaders all those who, like
Senator McCarthy, attempted to expose Communism. Zionism with its international
finance constitutes the real power behind the world revolution. Many foolish
American will deny that there is a conspiracy for a world revolution, but
they speak through ignorance.
This does not mean that all the Jews in this and other Western
countries are wilfully bent on destroying their respective host countries.
It seems that it is principally their leaders, the master minds, who are
reaching for complete power to be had, only, if the rugged White Race (the
True Israelites) can be subjugated or destroyed. For the most part, the
Jewish masses seem to have been enlisted only in a step-by-step progressive
destruction of our traditions, interests and rights, as they so often have
been used by the rabbis and rabble rousers and Jewish financial kings throughout
known history. And, even if all of the Jewish leaders in the world were
suddenly destroyed, the blood line of Esau would rise up others to take
Haw many rank and file Jews foresaw that immigration and the destruction
of racial segregation and the imposition of Affirmative Action laws across
America; all under Jewish pressure and demands, would lead to further denial
of rights to the Whites and the eventual outbreeding and destruction of
the White Race, is a matter of conjecture. Their understanding of the race
problem, the uniformity of their reaction to political and social situations
never cease to amaze us, as we watch events unfold. Whatever theories it
offers gullible people, Communism in practice turns out to be the domination
of the Whites by racial and social minorities under Jewish direction leading
to the liquidation of Christianity and the "leadership class," the producers
and defenders, of our race. Those who support the destructive measures
against us contribute to our disintegration, whatever their motives may
Communism - Part 48
Frankfurter, the Boss: It behooves us to study this man further,
as he was one of the most destructive of the Zionists who served on the
Supreme Court of the United States. He was the son of an Austrian revolutionary,
brought to America at the age of 12, Felix Frankfurter proved to be the
leading master mind behind the revolution in this innocent, naive republic.
It has long been known that, while a professor at Harvard Law
School, he indoctrinated hundreds of young Americans, Jews and non-Jews,
with Marxism, and later succeeded in planting "hundreds of happy hot dogs"
in key government positions. The late General Hugh Johnson, who for a time
was one of the New Deal appointees closet to the Jewish President Franklin
D. Roosevelt, resigning in alarm at the trend of the government, revealed
the Frankfurter strategy and exposed much of his already-powerful net,
in a series of four articles in Red Book Magazine in 1938.
After Frankfurter had built his net of friends and former students,
it was easy enough for him to appear pro-American, while his agents spread
confusion throughout the government, advancing government ownership and
controls, throwing China to the Communists, Poland, the Baltic states,
East Germany, part of Austria, part of Manchuria, half of Korea to the
Communists, preventing shipments of arms to South Korea and blocking efforts
to strengthen West Germany as a desperately needed ally.
The convicted Communist, Alger Hiss, and his good friend Dean
Acheson, were both favorites of Frankfurter, who disgraced the Supreme
Court by stepping down to testify for Hiss. Many papers, including some
Jewish, showed the influence of Frankfurter over the New Deal. Frank C.
Waldrop reported the following incident in his column in the Washington
Times-Herald: "In January, 1933, just before the first inauguration of
Franklin D. Roosevelt, Dr. J.B. Matthews, then a Communist (but later one
of the most capable advisers of the House anti-Communist Committee) was
circulating a petition urging recognition of Soviet Russia. When Matthews
sent someone to get the signature of Felix Frankfurter, the then professor
at Harvard Law School sent back word to stop circulating the petition,
that he, Frankfurter, 'had the President-elect in his vest pocket and could
guarantee recognition.'" (Washington Times-Herald, June 5, 1950)
Note that this was a Communist petition and that it was Professor
Frankfurter who had the power, without so much as asking Moscow, to stop
the circulation of the petition, when he himself had accomplished the Communist
objective by other methods. Frankfurter was one of the founders of the
American Civil Liberties Union, defender of Communists, perverts, Queers,
and every other type of degenerate known to man, in the courts, and became
an active Zionist office holder and committeeman as early as 1917.
In the early days of his career before he had built a machine
to do the work for him. Frankfurter was openly Communistic. He led a rabble
in defense of Sacco and Vanzetti, Communists eventually executed. He was
attorney for the Russian-American Industrial Corporation which was set
up to organize and finance the textile industry in Russia after the 1917
Bolshevik victory. Sidney Hillman and other notorious Communists were among
the organizers of the corporation, whose purpose was not to make a profit
but to help the new Communist government stabilize its economy until it
could take over the textile industry.
After investigating a Communist-inspired labor riot and counter-action
by police in Bisbee, Arizona, Frankfurter wrote a report to President Wilson
so biased that ex-President Theodore Roosevelt (another former President
who was Jewish), in a personal letter to the young revolutionary, accused
him of taking "on bhalf of the administration an attitude which seems to
be fundamentally that of Trotsky and the other Bolsheviki leaders in Russia;
an attitude which may be fraught with mischief to this country...Your report
is as thoroughly misleading a document as could be written on the subject...you
are engaged in excusing men precisely like the Bolsheviki in Russia, who
are murderers and the encouragers of murder..." This letter was simply
a deception to make the goyim to think that the Jews were against Russia.
Frankfurter was later acknowledged by friend and foe alike to
be the master of the U.S. State Department, using notably Dean Acheson
and Phillip Jessup (While America's tax money, through the Marshall Plan,
which later became known as "Point Four - to develop backward areas all
over the world" supposedly are to help the colonial areas and small nations
resist Communism, Jessup, long-time Communist Party liner, showed his disloyalty
in a statement quoted by the Associated Press from Pakistan, February 28:
"Indochina is progressing toward wiping out the last ties of colonialism...Full
independence of Vietnam will not be assured until French troops are withdrawn."
French troops are, of course, the only major force preventing Communist
"independence" rebels from capturing Vietnam. Jessup, a character witness
for Alger Hiss, obviously is using U.S. tax money to aid the Communists
in the "backward areas.") to shape American foreign policy to the interests
of the world revolution, stripping us of allies, preventing adoption of
a forthright program such as aid to the anti-Communist underground of the
Soviet dominated countries. Frankfurter is quoted as having said to a small
group of friends: "The real rulers of nations are undiscoverable."
Representative Jenkins of Ohio seriously questioned (in a speech
on the House floor, August 30, 1950) whether the President actually is
"strong enough to rid himself and the country of Dean Acheson and his tribe."
Alger Hiss, convicted of having sworn falsely in denying that
he had given classified documents to a Communist agent, admitted to a Congressional
committee that it was Frankfurter who got him into a high government office.
After Hiss' conviction, Acheson reaffirmed his faith in Hiss. Acheson follows
the same policies as those approved by Hiss, the Communist. How then can
Acheson be a loyal American? Acheson is in almost daily contact with Frankfurter,
taking walks with him or receiving telephone calls from him. Official Washington
recognizes both Hiss and Acheson as agents of the Frankfurter policies.
How then can Frankfurter have been anything but a Communist? (Now years
after the death of Frankfurter it is known that among others found to have
been Communists, indoctrinated by Frankfurter at Harvard Law School and
later placed in key government positions, were Lee Pressman, John Abt and
Nathan Witt. Max Lowenthal, close associate of Niles and Truman, were uncovered
by the House Committee on Un-American Activities as a highly influential
Communist, also was a Frankfurter underling. Lowenthal must have had inside
information before the stock marked crash in 1929; which prepared the situation
for the advent of the Jewish/Communist New Deal, for while White Americans
were going bankrupt, he made millions in a few days, selling short)
As Assistant Secretary of State during the war, Acheson, Hiss
and their companions, Service, Lattimore and others later identified in
the Amerasia spy case, advanced the Moscow line that the Chinese Communists
were only agrarian reformers, not Communists. Acheson continued to frustrate
American efforts to help Nationalist China and now insists that Chiang's
last base of operations, Formosa, was of no strategic value; that we should
not bother to defend it. (MacArthur, America's foremost military strategist,
held that if we let Formosa fall we will find the Pacific coast threatened)
Frankfurter Agents Sabotaged the U.S.: Senator Joseph McCarthy
submitted to the President sworn statements of four persons to the effect
that they, with four others, were employed in Acheson's department for
six months, during 1946, destroying all evidence of Communist sympathies
in the loyalty files on scores of State Department employees.
It was the Acheson-Hiss clique who engineered Roosevelt's give-away
program at Yalta (but Roosevelt had little care for selling out America
and the Eastern European nations for the Jews are the most traitorous people
of all, they will even sell out each oyher for money and power), which
built the Soviet power so rapidly. It was the same clique who induced President
Truman at Potsdam to permit Stalin to divide Korea at the 38th parallel,
and the same clique which consistently prevented America from either getting
entirely out of Asia or re-arming the South Koreans to defend themselves.
Acheson's excuse was that to rearm the South Koreans might inspire them
to attack the North Korean Communists. Why did he not want the South Koreans
and the Nationalist Chinese to attack the Communists?
"But the Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows
that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the
triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism."
(A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, pp. 143-144.)
Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980
Jewish Almanac is the following: "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to
call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite
or a Hebrew." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3)
"When all government, in little as in great things,
shall be drawn to Washington as the Center of all Power, it will render
powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become
as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated."
1821- In a letter to Gideon Granger.
Writings of Thomas Jefferson.