Communism - Part 85
The United States Congress conducted many investigations into
the Communist influence in our country in the '40s, '50s and early '60s.
However, any Congressman, who spoke out on this obvious connection
was immediately labeled as anti- Semitic. Men like Senator Joseph McCarthy
were driven to their graves with vitriolic epithets such as "McCarthyism."
As the Jewish love affair with Communism waned in the late '60s
and '70s, their political affiliations also changed. For many years, the
description of "right-wing" and "left-wing" used the ordinary circle in
The centrist position was at the top of the circle and as a person
became more "right-wing" he would move clockwise around the circle until
he reached the bottom of the circle, at which time he became known as a
Nazi or National Socialist.
If he moved counter-clockwise around the circle he became more
"left-wing" until he would reach the bottom of the circle and he would
then become known as a Communist. Both the extreme right-wing and the extreme
left-wing joined at the bottom of the circle.
At least, this was the case by definition. The reason the upper
Jews, the Zionists, changed their tactics was because a mass exodus was
taking place all over the world from Communism by Talmudic Jewry. Many
of them left the "left-wing" or Socialist- Communist-Zionist persuasion
and became "neo- conservatives" but they did it with a particular flair.
They retained many of their Socialist views but joined the so-called
Republican party and brought into it the totalitarianism of the old Federalists.
Consequently, greatly because of them, the old circle description of "left"
and "right" had to be replaced. It was replaced in political science circles
with what is called the Nolan Chart. The definitions are changed. A graph
is formed with the ordinate or y axis reflecting social freedoms and is
measured from 0 to 100%. This is called "left-wing." The abscissa or x
axis represents the economic freedoms and is likewise measured from 0 to
100%. This is called "right-wing."
Those who, not many years ago, were classified as Communists,
can now fight for "social freedoms" such as homosexuality, pre-marital
sex, sex education [Kindergarten through 12th grade], women's liberation,
liberalization of drug use, total pluralism, freedom from Christian principles,
etc. At the same time, they can have the economic freedoms of the free
enterprise system guaranteed by the Christian principles. The only problem
is that they won't heed the limitations of economic freedoms placed on
them by the same Christian principles.
The first response to this dichotomy is that they have given up
Communism. No, they haven't given up Communism; they have gained the social
freedoms that they could not have, even in the Soviet Union and at the
same time have unlimited economic freedoms, far exceeding the limits of
Returning to the Russian scene; during the recent so-called coup
attempt, three young men were killed in the heat of the confrontation.
One of the young men was Jewish and the other two were non- Jewish. The
Russian people considered them all to be martyrs and a much publicized
public service was held for them. The visibility of Russian Orthodox priests
were very evident. This appears to mean that the Christian Church is once
again being recognized. In fact, it is very obvious that the Christian
Church is in the forefront of the massive changes being seen in Russia.
Whether its being orchestrated by the KGB or the Communist Central Committee
remains to be seen.
At the public service a Rabbi was also allowed to conduct his
service for the young Jewish man who was killed. It is significant that
this young Jewish man had recently been given his immigration visa to go
to the Israeli State.
What has been the response to these actions within the leadership
of the American Jewish community? This can be described by excerpting from
an article found in the Religious News Service for August 30, 1991. The
article was written by Rabbi James Rudin who is the director of the American
Jewish Committee's inter-religious affairs and is a founder of The National
Inter-religious Task Force on Soviet Jewry.
After citing the incident described above he says, "For nearly
75 years the Soviet Union has officially been an atheistic state, and for
many of those years, the Communist rulers carried out an aggressive campaign
that prohibited parents from giving spiritual instruction to their children,
closed seminaries, persecuted believers and suppressed the publication
and distribution of prayer books, Bibles and other articles of religious
expression. Soviet Jews, Ukrainian Roman Catholics and Pentecostal Christians
were special targets of the Communist authorities.
The Soviet regime often sponsored acts of anti- Semitism, and
Jewish activists like Nathan Scharansky were falsely imprisoned for many
years. Many Jews who sought visas to live the Soviet Union were kept waiting
for years, and a new work, 'refusnik,' entered our vocabulary. For over
20 years, the struggle to bring freedom to Soviet Jewry has been one of
the world's major human rights efforts.
In this country Jews and Christians worked together in a remarkable
inter- religious effort that helped keep the Soviet Jewry movement alive,
even in its darkest days. At the same time that Jews were leaving in record
numbers, the old Soviet anti- religion policy was weakened, and then finally
abandoned. Religious faith, the first target of every totalitarian regime,
has emerged with renewed vigor and credibility.
Although the recent public funeral in Moscow was a sad occasion,
it was also a symbolic confirmation of the failure of the atheistic Soviet
State. But with this sense of confirmation must also come a sense of caution.
During Tsarist rule in Russia, religious faith, especially that
of the Russian Orthodox Church, was often a source of extreme nationalism,
xenophobia and anti-Semitism.
The intense entanglement of the church and the regime usually
resulted in political corruption and moral decadence. In the popular mind,
this linkage is personified by Gregory Rasputin, an Orthodox priest who
wielded enormous political power during the last days of the Romanov dynasty.
Indeed, the very name, Rasputin, has come to mean the evil influence
of religion of the affairs of state. Today we rejoice that religion in
the Soviet Union has been freed from the dungeon and has entered into the
light of freedom. However, we must remain vigilant. With credibility comes
responsibility. Just as we pressed our campaign to bring freedom to Jews
and Christians who suffered under Communist rule, we must now press with
equal commitment, our campaign to guarantee that religion within the USSR
does not now become as instrument for new prejudice and repression.
Many positive things have happened in the world of religion since
1917. Hopefully, the hard won principles of religious liberty, individual
conscience, minority rights and religious pluralism will also become an
integral part of the republics of the USSR. The symbolism and the rabbi
and the patriarch draws together by tragedy was both startling and encouraging."
This is a typical example of Jewish intellectual dishonesty. Let
us go over his points one by one. "For nearly 75 years the Soviet Union
has officially been an atheistic state...closing seminaries, persecuted
believers...suppressed... Soviet Jews, Ukrainian Roman Catholics and Pentecostal
Christians..."It is now 1992 and 75 years ago was 1917. That was the very
time that his own Jewish people were creating the revolution and were assisted
financially by people of like religious persuasion in the United States,
England and around the world.
Communism - Part 86
Their intentions from the outset were that Russia would be atheistic.
He indicates that Jews, Roman Catholics, and Pentecostal Christians were
the targets. Which is a bald face lie, the Jews were never targets, it
was the Christians who were murdered by the millions by the Jews, not by
some other group. No mention is made of the Russian Orthodox Church. This
is significant. The Church Times in London on April 13, 1923 said: "Already
twenty-eight bishops and twelve hundred priests of the Russian Holy Orthodox
Church have been sacrificed to the Bolshevik [Jewish] hatred of the Christian
Communist subversion of the Russian Orthodox
Church can be seen in the following article from The Los Angeles Times,
Monday, June 2, 1969, which stated: "MOSCOW (AP)--The Russian Orthodox
Church has found new favor here by developing 'Communist Christianity.'
This accepts the Communist social system as just and good and supports
Kremlin policies. It plays down the philosophic conflict between the Christian
faith and the atheistic materialism officially espoused by the government.
Notable evidence of a changed attitude toward the church [There could be
only one reason for this attitude. The Communists have taken total control
of the Russian Orthodox Church!] appears in the latest issue of he Magazine
Nauka I Religya (Science and Religion), the leading Soviet publication
on religious matters. The magazine used to assail religion and proclaim
the need for its disappearance from Soviet life.
The new article praises the Russian Orthodox Church for turning
to Communist Christianity, citing pronouncements by Orthodox leaders and
theologians to show they associate the Soviet system with the kingdom of
God on earth.
The previous issue of the magazine, taking a similarly favorable
attitude, wrote admiringly of church members as good Soviet citizens. It
referred to polls taken recently which were said to have confirmed this.
The new attitude in Nauka I Religya reflected an apparent Kremlin
attempt toward further reconciliation with religion. The post-Khrushchev
leadership seems ready to live with the Orthodox Church as part of the
national heritage. It has made a general attempt to end divisive quarrels
and rally all groups in the country. In an unusual move the government
is promoting a meeting in Moscow July 1-4 of Soviet religious leaders of
all faiths. They are to discuss peace and international friendship. The
support they are expected to give Kremlin policies would be in line with
the status churches have come to occupy in Soviet society. By approving
the regime they have been allowed to continue functioning, though with
restrictions meant to hold down their following. The magazine praised the
church for giving up its old alliance with capitalism and its concentration
the inner state of man and the after life in favor of more emphasis on
social justice and general human welfare on earth. 'The gist of the social
interpretation of Russian Orthodoxy lies in the concept of Communist Christianity,'
said the article by Pyotr Kurochkin, 'Communist Christianity appeals to
believers to get involved in the struggle for Socialism and Socialist Conceptions.'
Nauka I Religya quoted from Zhurnal Moskovskoi Patriarkhi magazine
of the Moscow Patriarchy to show how the church press treated the new outlook.
'The establishment of Christ's kingdom on earth is more and more associated
with the Communist reconstruction of the world,' the religious magazine
said. The magazine commented approvingly: 'Leaders of the modern Orthodox
Church proclaim that the atheistic Soviet authority carries out the will
of God by establishing a new life in a just society.'"
He went on to state: "Many Jews who sought visas to leave the
Soviet Union were kept waiting for yearsu..." The Jews were the only ones
who were allowed to leave. Some had to wait because they were employed
in sensitive military or government positions and were forced to wait until
they could be cleared by the higher Soviet Jewish authorities. Because
they know that a Jew's loyalty is always for sale. "The regime... sponsored...
anti-Semitism, and Jewish activists like Nathan Schransky were falsely
imprisoned for many years... 'refusnik' entered our vocabulary."
However, our history books don't read that way, George Bernard
Shaw, quoted in the Jewish Guardian of London on August 7, 1931 stated:
"I have seen the statement which Joseph Stalin gave recently to the Jewish
Telegraphic Agency on anti-Semitism in which the Soviet leader said that
under Soviet Laws Militant anti-Semitism is punishable by death."
The Jewish Voice, published in New York, in Vol. 2, No. 1, on
January 1942, contained Joseph Stalin's statement on anti-Semitism, given
by Stalin to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency on January 12, 1931, expounding
upon Stalin's stand against anti-Semitism as follows: "In the USSR anti-Semitism
is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon profoundly hostile to the Soviet
system. Accordingly the laws of the USSR provide that active anti-Semites
are punished with death." Also, Kurt Blumenfield states in The Jewish
Frontier (New York), January 1942, "Up to 50% of the Jews in the Soviet
Union are engaged as officials, clerks and in the intellectual profession.
In the totalitarian Communist system the Jew, instead of being engaged
in trade and business, has been the official, the employee of the State."
Rabbi Rudin makes no mention that the Jews officiated in the Soviet
regime. "During Tsarist rule in Russia...the Russian Orthodox Church was
often a source of extreme nationalism, xenophobia and anti- Semitism...resulted
in political corruption and moral decadence...this linkage is personified
by Gregory Rasputin, an Orthodox priest who wielded enormous political
power during the last days of the Romanov dynasty... Rasputin, has come
to mean the evil influence of religion in the affairs of state."
Gregory Yefimovich Rasputin was born in 1872 and died December
30, 1916, in St. Petersburg. He was a Siberian peasant and mystic, whose
ability to improve the condition of Alexis Nikolayevich, the hemophiliac
heir to the Russian throne, made him a powerful favorite in the court of
Emperor Nicholas II and Empress Alexandria. After a two year study at Mt.
Athos in Greece, he returned to Russian and soon became widely known for
his healing arts.
He was in no way a Russian Orthodox Priest. The high society of
St. Petersburg warmly received the filthy, unkept peasant with brilliant
eyes and extraordinary healing talents. He was recommended by high church
officials to the imperial family in 1905, because of his ability to heal
illness. When he demonstrated an ability to ease the suffering of the young
Alexis, he was welcomed into the family circle as a close and trusted friend,
and Alexandria came to revere him as a holy man sent by God to save her
son, the Romanov dynasty, and the Russian autocracy.
When Emperor Nicholas II went off to take command of the army
during World War I, the Empress Alexandria acquired greater control of
the domestic affairs. Rasputin moved in and replaced capable officials
with unscrupulous men who made decisions adverse to the best interests
of the Christian Tzars and to Russia.
It is possible that those men were but forerunners of the 1917
revolution. The friends of the aristocracy attempted to kill him by poison
which didn't work and then by shooting him twice which also didn't work.
Finally they succeeded by drowning him in the Neva River by throwing
him in a hole in the ice covered river. It is true that Rasputin was a
very base and course individual with unclean and immoral habits. But he
was in no way a Russian Orthodox Priest and he certainly did not represent
the "intense entanglement of the church and the regime (which) usually
resulted in Political corruption and moral decadence."
Rabbi Rudin stated, "Just as we pressed our campaign to bring
freedom to Jews and Christians who suffered under Communist rule, we must
now press with equal commitment our campaign to guarantee that religion
within the USSR does not now become an instrument for new prejudice and
repression. Many positive things happened in the world of religion since
1917..." It is certainly true, that many things have happened in
the world of religion since 1917. But they have been anything but positive.
The Russian Revolution of March, 1917, came like a great explosion. The
general public among the Nations were caught with surprise by the event,
the significance of which was neither properly analyzed nor thoroughly
understood. Much less investigated properly. "There is scarcely an event
in modern history that cannot be traced to the Jews. We Jews today, are
nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyer's, its incendiaries."
(Jewish Writer, Oscar Levy, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution)
For those, however, who were familiar with the international situation
and who had been watching developments in the Russian Empire since the
beginning of the war, there was nothing unexpected about the revolutionary
Communism - Part 87
The first seeds of the revolt were planted in the early part of
1916, on the eve of the victorious offensive of the Russian armies in Galicia.
For the first time since the beginning of the war, revolutionary pamphlets
were observed at the front.
The propaganda was primitive in its general outline. The invisible
germs of destruction were cultivated by raising suspicion in the minds
of the soldiers as to the sincerity of the Imperial Russian Government
in regard to its resolve to carry the war to a victorious end. Vague rumors
were spread about the sinister influence of Rasputin, his alleged close
relations with the Czarina, the weakness of the Czar, and the illness of
From time to time pamphlets were picked up at the front and in
the armories in the rear, suggesting to the soldiers a dreadful thought
that while he was fighting the external enemy, the nobility might take
advantage of his absence in order to deprive him of his land.
There were more suggestions, for there was nothing definite in
the propaganda in its early stage. But the poison was there, and it slowly
wormed its way through the minds of the Russian soldiers, gradually penetrating
into his very soul. Little by little the tone of the propaganda became
more aggressive. Pacifist slogans were continuously disseminated. The soldiers
were urged to disobey their officers and to otherwise violate military
discipline. "Conscientious objectors" were glorified in various leaflets
distributed among the soldiers, especially in the rear.
Theories were promulgated to the effect that the Central Powers
were not inimical to the interests of Russia and that the Russian people
had but one enemy, namely, the Imperial Russian Government, supported by
the bourgeoisie and the Russian nobility.
What invisible hand was sowing the seeds of discord among the
nation hitherto united? European and American public opinion was always
inclined to maintain that pacifist and revolutionary propaganda in Russia
was exclusively fomented by the Central Powers. This belief was justified,
but to a certain extent only. The Imperial German Government had done everything
in its power to break down the morale of the Russian army.
It is true that part of the revolutionary literature which was
spread in Russia prior to and since the March Revolution of 1917 was made
in and imported from Germany. It also cannot be denied that the Central
Powers did dispatch to Russia through Sweden a number of professional revolutionists.
In this connection General Ludendorff's own confession is of the utmost
In his memoirs it is stated: "By sending Lenin to Russia our Government
had, moreover, assumed a great responsibility. From a military point of
view his journey was justified, for Russia had to be laid low. But our
Government should have seen to it that we also were not involved in her
fall. The events in Russia gave me no cause for complete satisfaction.
They considerably eased the military situation, but elements of the greatest
danger still remained." (Lundendoriff's Own Story, Vol. II, pp. 126-127)
In her book, The Firebrand of Bolshevism, Princess Radziwill specifically
refers to this fact. She states that during the Fall of 1916 several conferences
were held on Swedish territory, among other places in the Town of Malmo,
near the Danish frontier, between Herr Steinwachs, one of the most able
German Secret Agents, and a close group of Russian Jews: "Among them was
a man named Kameneff, whose name was found later on among the signatures
at the bottom of the treaty of Brest-Litovisk and who introduced himself
as a confidential friend of both Lenin and Trotzky. This Kameneff was another
repulsive Jew, but undoubtedly an intelligent creature whose only principle
was to enrich himself at any price and in the shortest of time. He was
eager for action, because he realized that it was only through some upheaval
or other that he would be enabled to lay his greedy hands on the Russian
public exchequer. Captain Rustenberg heard afterwards that when it came
to the partition of the millions which Germany paid for the betrayal of
Russia to the Bolsheviks, Kameneff was the man who got the lion's share."
(Princess Catherine Radziwill, The Firebrand of Bolshevism, pp. 203-204)
Kameneff, whose real name was Rosenfeld, was one of the most notorious
Soviet officials. He replaced Krassin as Chairman of the Bolshevist delegation
to Great Britain, which was dispatched to conduct negotiations for the
resumption of trade relations between England and Soviet Russia. Rosenfeld-Kameneff
was said to be a brother-in-law of Trotzky (Bronstein).
During the Summer of 1916 a secret report was received by the
Russian General Headquarters from one of its agents in New York. This report,
dated February 15, 1916, reads in part as follows: "The Russian Revolutionary
Party of America has evidently resumed its activities. As a consequence
of it, momentous developments are expected to follow. The first confidential
meeting which marked the beginning of a new era of violence took place
on Monday evening, February 14, 1916, in the East Side of New York City.
It was attended by sixty-two delegates fifty of whom were 'veterans' of
the revolution of 1905, the rest being newly admitted members. Among the
delegates were a large percentage of Jews, most of them belonging to the
intellectual class, as doctors, publicists, etc., but also some professional
revolutionists...The proceedings of this first meeting were almost entirely
devoted to the discussion of finding ways and means to start a great revolution
in Russia as the 'most favorable moment for it is close at hand.'
It was revealed that secret reports had just reached the party
from Russia, describing the situation as very favorable, when all arrangements
for an immediate outbreak were completed. The only serious problem was
the financial question but whenever this was raised the assembly was immediately
assured by some of the members that this question did not need to cause
any embarrassment as ample funds, if necessary, would be furnished by persons
in sympathy with the movement of liberating the people of Russia. In this
connection the name of Jacob Schiff was repeatedly mentioned."
It was further added in the report that: "The soul of this new
revolutionary movement is the German Ambassador in Washington, Count Bernstorff,
Dr. Albert, the financial agent attached to the German Embassy in Washington,
is manager of this revolution, just as he was manager of the revolution
which took place in Mexico. He is aided in his task by the first Secretary
of the German Embassy."
It was not a coincidence that at the notorious meeting held at
Stockholm in 1916, between the former Russian Minister of the Interior,
Protopopoff, and the German Agents, the German Foreign Office was represented
by Mr. Warburg, whose two brothers were members of the International Banking
firm Kuhn, Loeb & Company, of which the late Jacob Schiff was a senior
Nor is it a mere coincidence that in the later stages of the Russian
Revolution we still find international finance hard at work engaged in
further endeavors to break the last resistance of Russia against the onslaught
of the "Triple Alliance," that is of the Central Powers, Revolutionary
International-ism and International Finance itself. Indeed, this was a
world-conspiracy, first against Russia and next against Christian civilization
at large. The following two documents throw a peculiar sidelight upon the
nature of this sinister enterprise.
(1) Copenhagen, June 18, 1917.
Mr. Ruffner, Helsingfors. Dear Sir: Please be advised that from
the Disconto-Gesellschaft account 315,000 marks have been transferred
to Mr. Lenin's account in Kronstadt, as per order of the Syndicate. Kindly
acknowledge receipt: Nilandeway 98, Copenhagen, W. Hansen & Co. --
(2) Stockholm, September 21, 1917.
Mr. Raphael Scholan Haparanda. Dear Comrade: The office of the
banking house M. Warburg has opened in accordance with telegram from president
of Rheinish-Westphalian syndicate an account for the undertaking of Comrade
Trotzky. The attorney (agent) purchased arms and has organized their transportation
and delivery up to Luleo and Varde. Name to the office of Essen & Son
in Luleo, receivers, and a person authorized to receive the money demanded
by Comrade Trotzky. J. Furstenberg. (The German-Bolshevik Conspiracy, issued
by The Committee on Public Information, Washington, D.C., p. 27, October,
1918. The documents as above quoted were never repudiated by the Disconto-Gesellschaft
or the Rheinish-Westphalian Syndicate)
Communism - Part 88
"The principle of human equality prevents the creation of social
inequalities. Whence it is clear why neither Arabs nor the Jews have hereditary
nobility; the notion even of 'blue blood' is lacking. The primary condition
for these social differences would have been the admission of human inequality;
the contrary principle, is among the Jews, at the base of everything. The
accessory cause of the revolutionary tendencies in Jewish history resides
also in this extreme doctrine of equality.
How could a State, necessarily organized as a hierarchy, subsist
if all the men who composed it remained strictly equal? What strikes us
indeed, in Jewish history is the almost total lack of organized and lasting
State...Endowed with all qualities necessary to form politically a nation
and a state, neither Jews nor Arabs have known how to build up a definite
form of government. The whole political history of these two peoples is
deeply impregnated with undiscipline.
The whole of Jewish history...is filled at every step with 'popular
movements' of which the material reason eludes us. Even more, in Europe,
during the 19th and 20th centuries the part played by the Jews in all Revolutionary
Movements is Considerable. And if, in Russia, previous persecution could
perhaps be made to explain this participation, it is not at all the same
thing in Hungary, in Bavaria, or elsewhere. As in Arab history the explanation
of these tendencies must be sought in the domain of psychology." (Kadmi
Cohen, pp. 76-78; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon
de Poncins, pp. 192-193)
"There was no opposition organized against Bela Kun. Like Lenin
he surrounded himself with commissaries having absolute authority. of the
32 principle commissaries 25 were Jews, a proportion nearly similar to
that in Russia. The most important of them formed a Directory of five:
Bela Kun alias Kohn, Bela Vaga (Weiss), Joseph Pogany (Schwartz), Sigismond
Kunfi (Kunstatter), and another. Other chiefs were Alpari and Szamuelly
who directed the Red Terror, as well as the executions and tortures of
the bourgeoisie." (A report on revolutionary activities published by a
committee of the Legislature of New York, presided over by Senator Lusk;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 124)
"Szamuelly travelled about Hungary in his special train; an eye witness
gives the following description: 'This train of death rumbled through the
Hungarian night, and where it stopped, men hung from trees, and blood flowed
in the streets. Along the railway line one often found naked and mutilated
Szamuelly passed sentence of death in the train and those forced
to enter it never related what they had seen. Szamuelly lived in it constantly,
thirty Chinese terrorists watched over his safety; special executioners
accompanied him. The train was composed of two saloon cars, two first class
cars reserved for the terrorists and two third class cars reserved for
the victims. In the later the executions took place. the floors were stained
with blood. the corpses were thrown from the windows while Szamuelly sat
at his dainty little writing table, in the saloon car upholstered in pink
silk and ornamented with mirrors. A single gesture of his hand dealt out
life or death.'" (C. De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p. 204. Paris, 1919,
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 122)
One should remember that Furstenberg, who also assumed the name
of Ganetzky, together with his Jewish friend Radek, alias Sobelshon, became
later prominent members of the Soviet Government. In March, 1917, Furstenberg
took an active part in the "defeatist" propaganda in Russia, and it was
through his medium that part of the money contributed by the German- Jewish
bankers to the leaders of the destruction of civilization was forwarded
The documents above quoted reveal the active participation of
international banking organizations in the "undertaking of Comrade Trotzky."
The Disconto- Gesellschaft, the Rheinish-Westphalian Syndicate, the international
banking firm of Warburg, the various subsidiary banking institutions in
Scandinavia, such as the Nya Banken, all of them were working in harmonious
accord with the red generals of the world-revolution. This was the "one
big union" the aim of which was the complete destruction, if possible the
annihilation, of "holy Russia," the corner-stone of European Christianity.
It was only later, after the terrible events it became possible to appreciate
fully the accuracy of the information presented in the secret report of
Count Lamsdorf, former Russian Foreign Minister, to Emperor Nicholas II,
dated January 3, 1906, on the international aspect of the first revolutionary
outbreak in Russian in 1905.
Some of the passages in this report are so striking that we feel
it necessary to quote them in extenso: "The events which took place in
Russian during 1905, and which assumed especially acute forms at the beginning
of October last, when after a series of strikes, they brought about an
armed revolt in Moscow, and many other towns and localities of the Empire,
plainly indicate that the Russian revolutionary movement, apart from its
deeper, internal, social-economic and political causes, the circumstances
that the Russian revolutionaries are in possession of great quantities
of arms which are imported from abroad, and of very considerable financial
means, because there can be no doubt that the leaders of the revolution
have already spent on our anti-government movement, the organization of
all sorts of strikes included, large amounts of money.
Since, however, it must be acknowledged that such support given
to the revolutionary movement by sending arms ad money from abroad can
hardly be ascribed to foreign governments (with very special exceptions,
as, for instance, that of Sweden supporting the revolutionary movement
in Finland, and of Austria which helped the Poles) one is bound to come
to the conclusion that there are foreign capitalists' organizations which
are interested in supporting our revolutionary movement.
With this conclusion the fact must be confronted that the Russian
revolutionary movement has the outspoken character of a movement of the
heterogeneous nationalities of Russia which one after another, Armenians
and Georgians, Letts and Esths, Finns, Poles and others, arose against
the Imperial Government...If we add to the above that, as has been proved
beyond any doubt, a very considerable part among these heterogeneous nationalities
is played by Jews, who, individually, as ringleaders in the other organizations,
as well as through their own (the Jewish Bund in the Western Provinces),
have always come forward as the most bellicose element of the revolution,
we may feel entitled to assume that the above-mentioned foreign support
of the Russian revolutionary movement comes from Jewish capitalist circles.
In this respect one must not ignore the following concurrences
of facts which lead to further conclusions, namely, that the revolutionary
movement is not only supported but also to a certain degree directed from
abroad. One hand, the strike broke out with special violence and spread
all over Russia not before and not after October, that is, just at the
time when our government tried to realize a considerable foreign loan without
the participation of the Rothschilds and just in time for preventing the
carrying out of this financial operation; the panic provoked among the
buyers and holders of Russian loans could not fail to give additional advantages
to the Jewish bankers and capitalists who openly and knowingly speculated
upon the fall of the Russian rates...Moreover, certain very significant
facts, which were also mentioned in the press, quite confirm the obvious
connection of the Russian Revolutionary movement with the foreign Jewish
Thus, for instance the above-mentioned importation of arms, which
according to our agents' information was carried on from the European Continent
through England, can be duly appreciated if we take into consideration
that already in June, 1905, a special Anglo-Jewish committee of capitalists
was openly established in England for the purpose of collecting money for
arming fighting groups of Russian Jews, and that the well-known anti-Russian
publicist, Lucien Wolf, was the leading member of this committee. On the
other hand, in view of the fact that the sad consequences of the revolutionary
propaganda affected the Jews themselves.
Another committee of Jewish capitalists was formed in England,
under the leadership of Lord Rothschild, which collected considerable amounts
of contributions in England, France and Germany for the officially alleged
purpose of helping Russian Jews who suffered from pogroms. And lastly,
the Jews in America, without thinking it necessary formally to distinguish
between the two purposes, collect money for helping the pogrom suffers
and for arming the Jewish youth." (The full text of this report was published
in the American Hebrew and Jewish Messenger in its issue of July 13, 1918)
No wonder Mr. George von Lengerke Meyer, United States Ambassador
to Russia during the Russo- Japanese War, stated in an official letter
written to Mr. Elihu Root, at that time Secretary of State, dated December
30, 1905, that: "The Jews have undoubtedly to a large extent furnished
the brains and energy in the revolution throughout Russia." (George von
Lengerke Meyer, His Life and Public Works, p. 239)
Communism - Part 89
Nevertheless, in 1905, the revolutionary conspiracy failed. In
1917, it was bound to have succeeded not only on account of the fact that
much larger sums were put into play, not only because the efforts to corrupt
the Russian mob were highly organized by the brains of the German Chief
Command, but mainly on account of the general economic disorganization
which came as a result of the intolerable burden of a world war.
In 1917 the "Triple Alliance" took advantage of a factor which
was non-exist in 1905, namely, the state of national hysteria which prevailed
among the Russian people. The American people were systematically misled
by the press, just as they are today, as to the nature of the old regime
in Russia. The Imperial Government was pictured as a terrible machine of
oppression, as a monster whose sole aim was to keep the people under the
yoke of slavery ad majorem gloriam of the Czars.
Day by day lies were disseminated by innumerable periodicals,
mostly controlled by interests distinctly hostile to Russia, circulating
false stories about the dreadful conditions under which the Russian people
were living, referring to alleged dramatic episodes about the persecution
of various non-Russian elements in the heterogeneous populace of the former
The more simple-minded Europeans and Americans whose knowledge
of Russia was limited to George Kennan's volume, were earnestly convinced
that almost every Russian was a candidate for Siberia and that Russia herself
was nothing but a huge prison in which Russian multitudes were kept enslaved.
The education of the average person in civilized countries is
nothing to be proud of. Outside of the public school, where the four rules
of arithmetic are taught, the people acquire their knowledge mostly from
the daily press and this is but a poor means for developing one's mentality.
Russia had few friends throughout the world.
The press was probably among her deadliest enemies. It took many
years for the Western World to awaken to the fact that a grave injustice
had been inflicted upon Russia. but due to the absolute control of the
mass media by the Jews, there are still too many who have not come to that
In this connection it is interesting to read the testimony of
Mr. George Pitt-Rivers, who, being an Englishmen himself, could hardly
be suspected of inimical feelings towards his native country: "...It was
in England, the home of the Jews that the Tzar's Government was always
systematically vilified, for years made out as the blackest home of tyranny
and oppression in the world.
Although there were English writers like Mr. Stephen Graham who,
years ago, went out to Russia to live there because he considered it the
freest country in Europe. It was, of course, the least commercialized,
while England, one of the most commercialized countries, and the greatest
lovers and entertainers of Jews, in the world, in consequence, sees no
merit in a simple agricultural existence.
Neither is it surprising in view of her cult of unlimited industrialism,
and its consequences, an ever expanding industrial and urban population,
free commercial exploitation by all and sundry middlemen, usurers, Jews;
and the translations of all values into money-values, by which alone can
be realized that ideal of personal equality, dead-levelness and compulsory
mediocrity in which she glories under the name of Liberalism and Democracy.
Can England with her tradition of three hundred years of Jew-loving
free-mamonism, democratic- shopkeeping, Puritanism, and obsessional urban-
industrial expansion, in any case understand a healthier ideal of rural
simplicity and paternal government, which, in spite of the obvious shortcomings
of his successor, was the idea of Alexander III." (George Pitt-Rivers,
The World Significance of the Russian Revolution, pp. 20-21)
These views were in harmony with those which prevailed on the
East Side of New York. In an article published on March 16, 1917, entitled
"East Side Rejoices at Czar's Downfall," The New York Call described the
situation: "News of the Revolution in Russia stirred the East Side yesterday,
and the Russian-persecuted immigrants of that section of the city made
merry all day and night."
At the same time an editorial in the Forward, a Jewish daily published
in New York, stated: "The Revolution is on. We receive today the only cheering
news within the last three years of the bloody World War. The hearts of
every working man and woman burst with joy and gladness at this news. Nicholas
is overthrown. The Duma has taken the Government in its hands and the liberal
government rules. Hurrah!"
Mr. Abraham Cahan, editor of the above- mentioned paper, analyzing
the significance of the Revolution in Russia, stated that: "He considered
the Revolution a victory for the Jews, which opinion prevailed on the East
Side where rejoicing knew no bounds. We felt that this is a great triumph
for the Jews' cause. The anti-Jewish element in Russia has always been
identified with the anti-revolutionary party. Jews having always sat high
in the Councils of the revolutionists, all of our race became inseparably
linked with the opponents of the government in the official mind." (See
the New York Call, March 17, 1917, article entitled, Upheaval in Russia
Is Fight For Liberty (sic))
Since 1917, Christianity has been changed into Judeo-Christianity.
The term was never heard of 75 years ago. Judeo-Christianity with its pluralism
is now ordaining homosexuals and women. The greatest debates now going
on in official church councils relate to the values of pre-marital sex
and extra-martial sexual relationships. The Rabbis of Judaism understand
this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement. Rabbi Moshe Maggal
of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo-Christian
was relatively new, "There is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian Religion.
We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other."
(National Jewish Information Service, 6412 W. Olympic Blvd. L.A. CA)
It is common knowledge that the so-called Christian book publishers
are owned by non- Christians. The seminaries use Jewish Rabbis as teachers
of the Bible. There are very few individual Christian Churches where the
evils of our society and government are addressed. The people are staying
home, just like they did in Russia, and are receiving their guidance from
those government approves preachers on television and radio.
In Issues, the quarterly periodical of the American Council for
Judaism, Vol. 12, No. 8, we find on pages 12 to 14: "Kaplan emphasizes
the existence of a Jewish people but denies their superiority. He contends
that Jews cannot prove the existence of any specific covenant between them
and God. Jews are neither superior human beings, nor do they possess a
superior tradition because of the Torah [The Torah does not mean the first
five books of the Bible as most Christians have been led to believe, it
means the Babylonian Talmud]. 'We Jews regard our race as superior to all
humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races,
but to its triumph over them.' (Goldwin Smith, Jewish Professor of Modern
History at Oxford University, October, 1981)
It is related in the Talmud that Torah actually means The Talmud,
according to Kaplan. He implies that other religious civilizations offer
traditions equally good. He also rejects the inference that Jewish choosiness
consists of heightened ethical responsibility."
Rabbi Elmer Berger, Executive Director of the American Council
for Judaism stated in Issues. "Berger rejects the existence of a Jewish
people. He says: I find nothing to support the thesis that there is such
an entity as a Jewish people except in the sense that among all Jews there
are certain similarities of religious belief and practice. Burger argues
that the people believing in the God of Moses constituted a religious community,
not a nationality."
Communism - Part 90
Dr. Samuel Max Malamed, himself a Jew and an authority on the
origin of Communism, stated as editor of The Reflex, published in New York,
in the November 1927 issue, Vol. 1, No. 5, page 7, the following: "The
Russian Jew is often accused of being responsible for the rise of Bolshevism
and for the continuation of the Bolshevist regime. This accusation is founded
on the fact that so many Jews were to be found in the offices of the Soviet
Government in the first years of the revolution, and that their number
was out of proportion to the Jews in Russia. This fact cannot be denied."
Clare Sheridan, the well known journalist and student of the origin
of Communism, stated in The New York World, in an exhaustive analysis of
the origin of Communism, on December 13, 1920, on page 13, the following:
"The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by
them. They are in every Government office, in every bureau, in every newspaper
Sir Winston Churchill, being a half Jew himself, was as familiar
as any person in the world concerning the origin of Communism, was the
author of an article on that subject published in London, in The Illustrated
Sunday Herold of February 8, 1920, page 5, which among other things included
this observation: "The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish
places of worship were excepted by the Bolshevists from their universal
hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia
with villainies which are now being perpetrated."
The British Guardian of London, recognized throughout the world
as a highly dependable source of information on the origin of Communism,
on March 13, 1925, published in Vol. 6, No. 10, page 73, the following:
"...The majority of the most influential Bolshevist leaders are Jews."
Henry C. Emery, in his analysis of the origin of Communism, published
in The Yale Review of New Haven, in July 1919, in Vol. 8, No. 4, page 676
of that scholarly study, the following: "In the minds of some people, especially
in Russia, Bolshevism takes on the color of a revolt of the Jews against
David Lloyd George, the British Prime Minister at the time of
the overthrow of the Russian Government by the Communist revolution in
1917, is quoted in The World At The Crossroads, published in 1921 in Boston,
by its Russian author Boris Leo Brazol, as having stated: "... The Jews
of Russia wielded considerable influence in Bolshevik circles."
The Communist publication Kommunist of Kharkov, Russia, in its
April 12, 1919 issue reported the following concerning the origin of Communism,
according to The World Hoax, published in Asheville, North Carolina in
1938 by Ernest F. Elmhurst: "Without exaggeration, it may be said that
the great Russian Revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of the
George Pitt-Rivers in his classic, The World Significance of the
Russian Revolution, published in 1920 at Oxford, observed the following
concerning the origin of Communism: "...Jewry, as a whole, strove every
nerve to secure and heartily approved of the overthrow of the Russian monarchy,
which they regarded as their most formidable obstacle in the path of their
Rabbi Judah Leon Magnes, whose understanding of the origin of
Communism commanded the respect of his co-religionists as an expert on
the subject, stated in The Jewish Form on February 1919, published in New
York, page 722, this observation on the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917: "The
revolution in Russia set free creative forces -- and look what a large
company of Jews were available for immediate service."
Harry Waton, himself a Jew and a recognized authority on the question
of Communism, is quoted by others as having stated in his book, A Program
For The Jews and Humanity, published in 1939 in New York, pages 143-144
the following: "...In the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was
the triumph of Judaism..."
The Jewish World, of London in its August 18, 1922 issue, is quoted
by Colin Jordan in his Fraudulent Conversion, published in London in 1955,
as having published the following: "Business is gaining in Russia, and
with the new regime Jews are promptly becoming the captains of industry."
Robert Wilton in his history of the origin of Communism, The Last
Days of the Romanovs, published in 1920 in New York, reveals the illuminating
fact on page 391, as follows: "Taken according to the numbers of population,
the Jews represented one in ten; among the commissars that rule Bolshevist
Russia they are nine in ten, if anything, the proportion of Jews is still
William Jocobus Oudendijk, Netherlands Minister in Petrograd during
the Bolshevik revolution, in his excellent explanation of the origin of
Communism, Ways and By-Ways in Diplomacy, published in London in 1939 states
on page 246: "Those who were not for the Bolsheviks were not allowed to
be against them; they were to be exterminated."
The eminent Professor Charles Sarolea, of the University of Edinburgh,
in his analysis of the origin of Communism, Impressions of Soviet Russia,
published in 1924 in London, on page 159 states as follows: "That the Jews
played a leading part in the Bolshevist upheaval and are still playing
a leading part in the Bolshevist Government is a proposition which no one
will deny who has taken the trouble to study Russian affairs at first hand."
Before the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate,
in Washington, D.C., in 1920, dealing with Bolshevik Propaganda, Colonel
V.S. Hurban, Military Attache of the Czechoslovak Legation in Washington,
D.C., in sworn testimony testified to the following: "Perhaps I choose
a very difficult question when I speak of the role of the Jews in the Russian
revolution...I can not deny it, because it is a fact, and it is useless
to deny it, that in the Soviets from the beginning there have been a very
large percentage of Jews. It cannot be denied."
In an exhaustive study on the Origin of Communism under the title
The Protocols and World Revolution, not to be confused with the book of
a similar name, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, The Morning Post of
London is quoted as having published on April 9, 1921 the following: "These
Jews are at the present time in control of the Russian Government and they
have powerful friends in all the Allied countries who are helping them."
DeWitt Clinton Poole, Jr., the head of the Division of Russian
Affairs in the Department of State in Washington, D.C., prepared a "confidential"
memorandum for the Secretary of State, on October 28, 1921, which contained
the following statement: "One of the American prisoners who recently returned
from Russia made the following comment upon the position of Jews in Russia;
(1) though he saw many Commissars, he saw none who was not a Jew; (2) he
was tried by seven judges, all of whom were Jews."
The New York Times on February 17, 1938, on page 5, quoted Giornale
d'Italia of Rome, which published that Feodor Budenko, Charge d'affaires
of the Soviet Legation in Bucharest, Rumania, after severing all connections
with Bolshevism and fleeing to Rome, stated the following: "Jews who have
replaced pre-Bolshevist capitalists and who virtually control big industry
now have a monopoly of production and live lives of luxury."
The Morning Post of London on August 30, 1919, again quoted by
Small, Maynard & Co., of Boston, Mass., in 1920, as above mentioned,
published the following: "It is unfortunately true that Bolshevism is very
largely a Jewish movement. In Russia the Jewish Bolsheviks have taken a
terrible revenge upon all whom they regarded as enemies..."
"A Jew remains a Jew. Assimilalation is impossible, because a Jew cannot
change his national character. Whatever he does, he is a Jew and remains
a Jew. The majority has discovered this fact, but too late. Jews and Gentiles
discover that there is no issue. Both believed there was an issue. There
is none." (The Jews, Ludwig Lewisohn, in his book "Israel," 1926)
Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980
Jewish Almanac is the following: "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to
call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite
or a Hebrew." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3)