Will They Fire
Parts 1 through 2 (The Last One)
By Willie Martin

Jew Watch

Will They Fire? - Part 1

 While this is old news to many, I present it again to show you the beginning of operation Megiddo. There are others, but I will not present them now, for most people don't want to believe our American Government could possibly wish to destroy its own people. But the facts remain, as witnessed by

1). Ruby Ridge, Idaho;
2). Atlanta, Ga.;
3). The World Trade Center;
4). Flight 800;
5). The Oklahoma City Bombing;
6). TWA Flight 700;
7). One school shooting after another;
8). Now operation Megiddo. And many others acts which could be presented but these should suffice.
 The government is quite willing to murder its own citizens anytime they wish to have a new gun control law passed. There is no doubt that with the foreign troops on our soil that those in Washington are determined to render us incapable of defending ourselves. So load you guns, and sing praise Yahweh and pass the bullets, and make every shot count.

 Do you think the government agents are brave men or women? Look at the way they dress - they dress in a black nunji suit, with hood and mask to hide their face, wear body armor, armed with every sort of automatic weapon and offensive weapon. Is that the actions of a brave man/woman? No it is the action of a coward, a coward that is afraid to even show their face. They have screamed to the world for years that the KKK should show their face, and now they, like the cowards they are hide theirs. What a bunch of hypocrites.

 Do you falsely think that if you humbly sit back and do nothing that they will let you alone? If your neighbor gets into trouble will you help them or hide in your house like a snivelying coward? And hope they will pass you by. If you do hide in your house and not help your neighbor then you are no better than the cowards that are destroying him and his family.

 Do you think you will live forever? No you will die in your time and you can either live as a man or a coward. But rest ashured that if you live as a coward you cannot ever, EVER enter into the Kingdom of God. For the Scriptures state in Revelation 21:8: "But THE FEARFUL, AND UNBELIEVING, AND THE ABOMINABLE, AND MURDERERS, AND WHOREMONGERS, AND SORCERERS, AND IDOLATERS, AND ALL LIARS, SHALL HAVE THEIR PART IN THE LAKE WHICH BURNETH WITH FIRE AND BRIMSTONE: WHICH IS THE SECOND DEATH."

 1 Corinthians 16:13: "WATCH YE, STAND FAST IN THE FAITH, QUIT YOU LIKE MEN, BE STRONG."

 No Yahweh hates a coward and will totally destroy them when they come before them on judgment day. So, is it not better to die a man, than a coward?

 If you don't own a gun because you are so henpecked that you have allowed your wife to make a half female out of you and so you are afraid to own a gun, get yourself, a knife, a hoe, a shovel, an axe, a hammer, a large wrench, a ball bat, a bow and set of arrows (preferably with very sharp hunting tips) anything that you can use as a weapon. Put one by your bed, at the end of the couch, in the kitchen, in every room, in the garage, tool shed; anywhere you might be when they come. And make them pay dearly. If everyone will do this then soon they will not have anyone to send after anyone.

 Teach your children how to throw a knife, how to swing a ball bat, to shoot a bow and arrow, where to hit someone in the head that will either kill them or put them out of service, how to put poison into their food and drinks, how to make war. You old veterans know how to do it, so teach your children to war. It is better that they die fighting than to live as slaves.

 1 Timothy 5:8: "But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel." Defend your house, your wife, your children, your state agaisnt an enemy that will destroy you and your family if they can.

 Meet them head on, without fear, with a prayer in your heart for Yahweh to help you slay as many of the enemy as possible.

 Remember that Jude describes the enemy very well, if you will only study what he says.

 Jude 1:1-12: "Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are
sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called: Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied. Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. For THERE ARE CERTAIN MEN CREPT IN UNAWARES,WHO WERE BEFORE OF OLD ORDAINED TO THIS CONDEMNATION, UNGODLY MEN, TURNING THE GRACE OF OUR GOD INTO LASCIVIOUSNESS, AND DENYING THE ONLY LORD GOD, AND OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST. I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not. And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. LIKEWISE ALSO THESE FILTHY DREAMERS DEFILE THE FLESH, DESPISE DOMINION, AND SPEAK EVIL OF DIGNITIES. Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. BUT THESE SPEAK EVIL OF THOSE THINGS WHICH THEY KNOW NOT: BUT WHAT THEY KNOW NATURALLY, AS BRUTE BEASTS, IN THOSE THINGS THEY CORRUPT THEMSELVES. WOE UNTO THEM! FOR THEY HAVE GONE IN THE WAY OF CAIN, AND RAN GREEDILY AFTER THE ERROR OF BALAAM FOR REWARD, AND PERISHED IN THE GAINSAYING OF CORE. THESE ARE SPOTS IN YOUR FEASTS OF CHARITY, WHEN THEY FEAST WITH YOU, FEEDING THEMSELVES WITHOUT FEAR: CLOUDS THEY ARE WITHOUT WATER, CARRIED ABOUT OF WINDS; TREES WHOSE  FRUIT WITHERETH, WITHOUT FRUIT, TWICE DEAD, PLUCKED UP BY THE ROOTS."

 And so shall it be for the enemy, and all those traitors of our White Race, who help them. They will be totally destroyed in the fire.

 This is the Questionnaire that was unearthed a few years ago. The first reaction of the Administration was to pass it off as a thesis for a Captains Masters degree. Dornan Hit the roof with it as did many of us. Within 3 months it was declared to be classified.

 U.S. Armed Forces Survey: This is the questionnaire that was given in 1994 to select groups of U.S. armed forces personnel. Notice the  references to the U.N., the firing on American civilians and the correlations of the two aforementioned.

 Note questions 8-17 deal with the use of U.S. federal armed forces intervening in the civilian affairs of the U.S. public under the pretense of policemen. According to the U.S. Constitution (posse comitatus law) No federal forces are to be used in the civil control of the populace. Also note question 46 for a stunning question concerning the use of federal forces.

 Note questions 18-45 deals entirely with the United Nations, which is really the heart of this survey. Questions 1-7 are only lead in questions for the rest of the survey.

 Results to the article (paper file) is "Incredible" - The following is all taken in order: Combat Arms Survey: This questionnaire is to gather data concerning the attitudes of combat trained personnel with regards to non-traditional missions. All of your responses are confidential. Write your answers directly on the questionnaire form. In part II, place an "X" in the space provided for your response.

 Part I. Demographics:

 1: What service are you in?
 2: What is your pay grade? (e.g. E-7, O-7)
 3: What is your MOS code and description?
 4: What is your highest level of education in years?
 5: How many months did you serve in Operation Desert Storm/Desert Shield?
 6: How many months did you serve in Somalia?
 7: What state or country did you primarily reside in during childhood?
 Part II. Attitudes:

Do you feel that U.S. combat troops should be used within the United States for any of the following missions?

 8: Drug enforcement?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 9: Disaster relief? (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 10: Security at national events? (e.g. Olympic Games, Super Bowl)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 11: Environmental disaster clean-up?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 12: Substitute teachers in public schools?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 13: Community assistance programs? (e.g. landscaping, environmental cleanup, road repair, animal control)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 14: Federal and State prison guards?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 15: National emergency police force?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 16: Advisors to S.W.A.T. units, the F.B.I., or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (B.A.T.F.) (Burn All Todlers First)?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 17: Border patrol? (e.g. prevention of illegal aliens into U.S. territory)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 Do you fell that U.S. combat troops under U.S. command should be used in other countries for any of the following United Nations missions?
 18: Drug enforcement?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 19: Disaster relief? (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 20: Enviromental disaster clean-up?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 21: Peace keeping?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 22: Nation building? (Reconstruct civil government, develop public school systems,
develop or improve public transportation system...etc.)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 23: Humanitarian relief? (e.g. food, and medical supplies, temporary housing, and clothing)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 Do you feel that U.S. combat troops should be used in other countries, under the command of non-U.S. officiers appointed by the United Nations for any of the following missions?

 24: Drug enforcement?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 25: Disaster relief? (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 26: Enviromental disaster clean-up?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 27: Peace keeping?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 28: Nation building? (Reconstruct civil government, develop public school systems, develop or improve public transportation system...ect.)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 29: Humanitarian relief? (e.g. food, and medical supplies, temporary housing, and clothing)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 30: Police Action? (e.g. Korea, Vietnam, but serving under non-U.S. officiers)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 Consider the following statements:

 31: The U.S. runs a field training exercise. U.N. combat troops should be allowed to serve in U.S. combat units during these exercises, under U.S. command and control?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 32: The United Nations runs a field training exercise. U.S. combat troops under U.S./U.N. command and control should serve in U.N. combat units during these exercises?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 33: The United Nations runs a field training exercise. U.S. combat troops should serve under U.N. command and control during these exercises?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 34: U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. missions as long as the U.S. has full command and control?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 35: U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. missions under United Nations command and control?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 36: U.S. combat troops should be commanded by U.N. officers and non-commissioned officers (NCO's) at battalion and company levels while performing U.N. missions?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 37: It would make no difference to me to have U.N. solders as members of my team? (e.g. fire team, squad, platoon)
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 38: It would make no difference to me to take orders from a U.N. company commander?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion

 39: I feel the President of the United States has the authority to pass his responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief to the U.N. Secretary General?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion
 

Will They Fire? - 2 (Last One)

 40: I feel there is no conflict between my oath of office and serving as a U.N. soldier?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 41: I feel my unit's combat effectiveness would not be affected by performing humanitarian missions for the United Nations?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 42: I feel a designated unit of U.S. combat solders should be permanently assigned to the command and control of the United Nations?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 43: I would be willing to volunteer for assignment to a U.S. combat unit under a U.N. command?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 44: I would like U.N. member countries, including the U.S., to give the U.N. all the solders necessary to maintain world peace?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 45: I would swear to the following code: "I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve
in the forces which maintain world peace and every nation's way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense."
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

 46: The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. Consider the following statement: I would fire on U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government?
  (___) (___) (___)
  (___) (___)
 Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
 Agree No Opinion

End of questionnaire

 Note questions 8-17 deal with the use of U.S. federal armed forces intervening in the civilian affairs of the U.S. public under the pretense of policemen. According to the U.S. Constitution (posse comitatus law) No federal forces are to be used in the civil control of the populace. Also note question 46 for a stunning question concerning the use of federal forces.

 Note questions 18-45 deals entirely with the United Nations, which is really the heart of this survey. Questions 1-7 are only lead in questions for the rest of the survey.

 Now ask yourself these questions:

 1: Are we to turn over our armed forces to the U.N.?
 2: Can we be the U.N.'s world policeman?
 3: Or the world's policeman on our own?
 4: Should we give oath of allegiance to a foreign power?
 5: Should we compromise our U.S. Constitution in the name of world government?
 6: Who is first, the United States or the rest of the world, specifically the United Nations?
 7: Would you rather answer to a world court (United Nations court) or to the courts of the United States?
 8: Do you believe you will have any say in a world government or world court (United Nations)?
 9: Are you willing to sacrifice national sovereignty for world laws and courts?
 10: Is the United Nations better able to dictate our lives to us than we as a country are?
 11: DO YOU BELIEVE IN A NEW WORLD ORDER RUN BY THE UNITED NATIONS?
 Think about it, that is what this survey was meant to convey, A New World Order Run By the United Nations!
 

 Here are the results of the survey:

 Shoot Americans (New World Order Survey of Last Year) Survey Results One In Four Marines would fire! Results are in from the U.S. military "shoot Americans" survey - and they are disquieting By Mike Blair.

 About one in four U.S. Marines would be willing to fire upon American citizens in a government gun confiscation program, according to the results of a survey undertaken nearly a year ago at a Marine Corps Base in Southern California.

 In addition, more than four out of five of the Marines surveyed indicated they would be willing to "participate in missions under a U.S. National Emergency Police Force." The SPOTLIGHT has been provided the results of the survey contained in a master degree thesis, reportedly undertaken by a student at the Naval Postgraduate School at Monterey California, to determine "unit cohesion" when soldiers are assigned to "non-traditional missions."

 Few stories published in the SPOTLIGHT have created such a stir when it was revealed in this newspaper's July 25,1994 issue that the survey had been taken at the Marine base. On May 10,1994, the survey was undertaken by Navy Lt. Cmdr. Ernest G. Cunningham, purportedly as research for his thesis: "Peacekeeping and U.N. Operational control; A Study of their effect on Unit Cohesion," at the Marine base, located on the South-east corner of the Mojave Desert, about 70 miles due east of San Bernadino, California, just east of Los Angeles

 Received Degree: Cunningham turned in the thesis for printing on March 20 and was graduated from the post Graduate school on March 23, receiving his Master of Science in Manpower, Personnel and Training Analysis degree. According to U.S. Navy and Marine Corps officials, Cunningham administrated the survey to 300 Marine veterans of the Persian Gulf War and the earlier invasion of Panama in the base auditorium.

 He had the cooperation and permission of the base's public affairs officer, but Cunningham did not have consent of the base commander, Brig. Gen. Russell H. Sutton. In fact, Sutton did not know about the survey until afterwards. The results of the survey have until now been "classified," according to a Marine Corps spokesman.

 The survey contained 46 questions dealing with the Marines' willingness to perform "non-traditional" missions. Question 46, dealing with a gun confiscation scenario, jolted both the Marines and Navy, as well as The Department of Defense, numerous members of the House and Senate and virtually every American concerned with the second amendment to the U.S. constitution, which guarantees the people's right to "keep and bear arms."

 Very Disturbing: This is how the question was posed to the Marines: "The U.S. Government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. "Consider the following statement: 'I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S.
government'."

 The question was then posed as to what degree the individual Marine agreed with the statement. According to results given in Cunningham's thesis, a total of 88 percent, or 264 Marines, responded to the question. Of the 264 who responded, 26.34 percent, or 79 Marines indicated they would be willing to fire upon U.S. citizens."

 Of that total, 18.67 percent or 56 Marines, indicated they "agree" with the statement, and 7.67 percent or 23 Marines, indicated that "strongly agree." A total of 61.66 percent, or 185, indicated that they were opposed to firing on citizens.

 Of that total, 42.33 percent, or 127, indicated they "strongly disagree" and 19.33 percent or 58, indicated they "disagree." In is thesis, Cunningham noted: "This particular question, unlike the others, elicited from 15.97 percent of the respondents with an opinion, either heavier pen or pencil marks on the response or written comments in the margin space. The responses to this scenario suggest that a complete unit breakdown could occur in a unit tasked to execute this mission."

 In other words, if a commander asked the men of his unit to raise their hands in a simple poll, he could determine the position of such servicemen and those who responded in the affirmative could be tasked for such a mission. This is just one of the reasons the question, not to mention the fact that it was allowed to be asked, is obviously potentially dangerous.

 In fact, several months before the survey was taken at Twenty-Nine Palms, the SPOTLIGHT, MODERN GUN and other publications revealed the question posed by Cunningham in his survey had ben asked of members of a U.S. Seal (Sea-Air-land) team. In addition, despite Navy and Marine Corps denials, there have been dozens of reports, unconfirmed, that the survey has been given to other servicemen, as well as various law enforcement agents.

 Further Surveys? In fact, Cunningham notes: "If the results of this survey elicit concerns in the areas queried, then further studies are warranted. Perhaps a random sample survey should be conducted to determine whether the results of this survey is valid for the entire Marine Corps and/or Army. Also, a survey could provide an indication of the volunteer pool that would seek service in units dedicated to, and specialized in, peacekeeping operations...Also of concern is the fact, as reported by Cunningham in his thesis that 97.67 percent of the Marines responded to a question--an overwhelming 85.33 percent in the affirmative--that they would be willing to participate in missions under a U.S. National Emergency Police Force..."

 "Furthermore," Cunningham notes "43.0 percent of the soldiers strongly agreed..." Federal Troops have been restricted from participation with local police authorities to quell domestic violence since the passage of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. That
being the case, it was surprising that these soldiers seemed not to know the legal restrictions placed on them by this act."

 He also noted, however, that "In May 1992, 4,000 U.S. Army and Marine Soldiers were ordered by President George Bush to augment city and county law enforcement and state National Guard during the riot in Los Angeles, California following the Rodney King trial. "Since, 1981," Cunningham states, "the majority of today's All Volunteer Force has been exposed to and participated in an environment of expanding non-traditional missions when Congress passed the Military

 Cooperation with Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies Act of 1981. This act enabled the Military to participate in the drug war. This cooperative alliance of military and civilian police efforts in the name of national security may have eroded the demarcation between civilian law enforcement and our military institution first established by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878."

 The results of another question, No. 45, posed by the survey, indicates American soldiers are not eager to swear allegiance to the United Nations, although nearly one in four would do so. Question 45 states: "I would swear to the following code:'I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in the forces which maintain world peace and every nation's way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense'."

 A total of 69.33 percent, or 208 Marines surveyed, indicated they disagreed, with 117, or 39 percent, indicating they strongly disagreed. On the other hand, 71 Marines, or 23.66 percent, indicated they would be willing to swear such allegiance to the UN, with 19, or 6.33 percent, indicating they were strongly in favor of doing so. "For thousands of years."

 Cunningham notes in his thesis, "military organizations have required their soldiers to swear to some kind of code or allegiance. A code provides a standard for the soldiers to live up to and, in many cases, to die for. A code can be a powerful tool for establishing and sustaining unit cohesion. But what if the mission a solider is assigned to perform counters or confuses the code he has sworn to uphold? Question 45 was presented to determine if the soldiers would swear to such a code."

 No one knows if the American personnel traveling in the helicopter shot down over Iraq [by "friendly fire"] in April 1994 would have sworn allegiance to such a code. Yet, Vice President Albert Gore stated that these Americans "died in the service of The United Nations." "It is patently clear," a retired high ranking Army Officer told The SPOTLIGHT,"that this survey raises some very serious issues, not the least of which is that U.S. servicemen are not being properly educated as to the limits of their service in the civilian sector. This is most dangerous, and, I should think the Congress has an obligation to the people to take a careful look at this, not to mention the people at the Pentagon."

horizontal rule

Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3)
 
Click Here if you would like a hard copy of any of Willie Martin's books

Jew Watch - Willie Martin

horizontal rule