Miscegnation An Abomination
- Part 7
And, as we have seen, the viability of such
a morality of self-sacrifice is especially problematic in the context of
a multi-cultural society in which everyone is highly conscious of group
membership and there is between-group competition for resources. Although
the success of the anti-restrictionist effort is an indication that people
can be induced to be altruistic toward other groups, I rather doubt such
altruism will continue to occur if there are obvious signs that the status
and political power of the European-derived group is decreasing while the
power of other groups increases as a result of immigration and other social
The prediction, both on common sense grounds
and on the basis of psychological research on social identity process (e.g.,
Hogg & Abrams, 1987), is that as other groups become increasingly powerful
and salient in a multi-cultural society, the European-derived peoples of
the United States will become increasingly unified and that contemporary
divisive influences among the European-derived peoples of the United States
(e.g., issues related to gender and sexual orientation; social class differences;
religious differences) will be increasingly perceived as unimportant.
Eventually these groups will develop greater
cohesion and a sense of common interest in their interactions with the
other ethnic groups with profound consequences on the future history of
America and the West.
Therefore, we can see the power behind the
scenes which caused to be passed the Immigration Law, by an emasculated
liberal Congress, which allows 714,000 immigrants to come into the United
States, 1992-1994, excluding refugees, whose numbers increase alarmingly
every year. In 1992, over 50,000 Jews from Russia have been granted immigration
status, and you can be assured that the majority of these are communists.
At one time, before an immigrant was accepted,
they had to prove a source of income, so that they would not become a public
liability. Today, they begin immediately to receive welfare payments, and
some even get Social Security, although they have not paid a cent into
that fund. The Jews are given special compensation to get started. Both
leal and illegal immigrants are granted welfare and food stamps within
a month after they enter this country, and this is further driving us into
What has been the effect of this almost
unlimited immigration from Third World nations/ (Where the majority of
immigrants used to come from the White Nations of Christendom, they now
come from the most ignorant, and non-white nations)
First, crime rates shot sky high in every
area where Third World immigrants have settled in any number. Many were
criminals before they came to this country and were engaged in drugs and
prostitution. Many came to America seeking asylum from prosecution for
crimes they had committed. Along with crime, we have seen disease rates
shoot "sky high," with new and apparently incurable Oriental and African
diseases showing up, while ancient killers like cholera, tuberculosis,
and diphtheria, which we thought had been eradicated, are now becoming
But what has this to do with "miscegenation?"
Very much! For this influx of non-white foreigners, plus the relaxing of
moral standards by the same enemy which encouraged immigration, is now
deliberately mixing White boys and girls, with those of other races, knowing
that close association will cause inter-racial sexual activity.
These are the "intellectual traitors," we
are dealing with in our schools. They are encouraged by the National Education
Association. These are the ones who push "sex education" in the schools,
knowing full well that it does not protect the students, but causes them
to be sexually active. They know that handing out condoms does not promote
morality among our youth, but encourages immorality.
This is their goal, the weakening of the
moral and spiritual status of our people, to where they can be amalgamated
and controlled. They know that history proves that racial integration has
been a major factor in the destruction of every great civilization which
has practiced it, during the sixty some odd centauries of written history.
No nation which has experimented with miscegenation,
has survived the social disaster it has caused, and since the plans of
the conspirators call for the destruction of White Christian Civilization,
they know they MUST destroy our youth, who are the foundation of our future
strength. (Do you realize that government psychologists have now declared
that anyone who believes in the "conspiratorial aspect" of history, is
mentally unstable, and paranoid?) Maybe this is why they are killing themselves
by suicide, four times faster than the rest of us "nuts."
But above and beyond social conditions we
MUST put God's Word first if we are truly to be called Christian. We dare
you to take an in-depth look at the racial issue, as presented in God's
Word. If you are honest in your studies, you will find that God forcefully
condemns the practice of miscegenation in His People.
But if your "wolf pastors" can "hoodwink"
you into refusing to accept your Israel heritage, these scriptures will
have very little meaning to you, and will be completely overlooked in the
preaching that come from your church.
The Israel People (Who have never been Jews)
were chosen by God as His special ambassadors to carry His message of salvation,
and Kingdom living to all men, through the Gospel of the Kingdom.
There are many reasons why inter-racial
marriage is wrong, but in this message we will concentrate on the spiritual
reasons as given in the Word of God.
Many of us have observed the heartache and
sadness which has come to the offspring of mixed marriages, as they are
never completely accepted by either race.
While the father and mother may enjoy their
sexual experiment, their children invariably suffer from it. God's Word
gives many reason why He condemns miscegenation and declares it to be an
evil practice, an abomination.
Segregation: A Divinely-Instituted
One cannot study the Scriptures without
realizing the extent to which both segregation and separation are stressed
in God's dealings with races, with nations and with individuals. Under
the Laws of God fields are not to be sown with mingled seed; nor does He
approve the wearing of garments of mixed materials. "Ye shall keep my statutes.
THOU SHALT NOT LET THY CATTLE GENDER WITH A DIVERSE KIND: THOU SHALT NOT
SOW THY FIELD WITH MINGLED SEED: NEITHER SHALL A GARMENT MINGLED OF LINEN
AND WOOLLEN COME UPON THEE." (Leviticus 19:19)
Most important of all, the intermingling
of races is not sanctioned by God and, when His probation against interracial
marriages is ignored, trouble invariably ensues. "Now therefore GIVE NOT
YOUR DAUGHTERS UNTO THEIR SONS, NEITHER TAKE THEIR DAUGHTERS UNTO YOUR
SONS, nor seek their peace or their wealth for ever: that ye may be strong,
and eat the good of the land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children
for ever. And AFTER ALL THAT IS COME UPON US FOR OUR EVIL DEEDS (Marrying
other races), AND FOR OUR GREAT TRESPASS, seeing that thou our God hast
punished us less than our iniquities deserve, and hast given us such deliverance
as this; SHOULD WE AGAIN BREAK THY COMMANDMENTS, AND JOIN IN AFFINITY WITH
THE PEOPLE OF THESE ABOMINATIONS? wouldest not thou be angry with us till
thou hadst consumed us, so that there should be no remnant nor escaping?
O LORD God of Israel, thou art righteous: for we remain yet escaped, as
it is this day: behold, we are before thee in our trespasses: for we cannot
stand before thee because of this." (Ezra 9:12-15)
Miscegnation An Abomination -
In His Law Yahweh emphasizes His opposition to
adulteration with respect to vegetation, clothing, animals and races.
The Prophet Isaiah denounced the intermarriages
that had taken place with heathen peoples (The other races), resulting
in "strange" children being born in the land. (Isaiah 2:6) This gave rise
to many evil practices, for alien wives, with their children, turned the
hearts of the Israel people away from Yahweh and toward idolatry.
It was forbidden intermarriages during the
antediluvian era that brought judgment by the destruction of the Deluge.
Only Noah was declared to be perfect in his generations; that is, free
form the hereditary taint of miscegenation, and he and his family were
saved in the Ark.
Perfect: Strong's Concordance: #8549
tamiym (taw-meem'); from 8552; entire (literally, figuratively or morally);
also (as noun) integrity, truth: KJV-- without blemish, complete, full,
perfect, sincerely (-ity), sound, without spot, undefiled, upright (-ly),
Generations: Strong's Concordance: #1755
dowr (dore); or (shortened) dor (dore); from 1752; properly, a revolution
of time, i.e. an age or generation; also a dwelling: KJV-- age, X evermore,
generation, [n-] ever, posterity.
A little more than a century after Noah
and his family disembarked from the Ark to repeople (replenish) the earth,
we are informed that all peoples were speaking one language. The time came
when a great movement was instituted by the people in order to organize
themselves into an integrated society and bring unity into human activities
and endeavors. The emphasis was placed on the propensities of the flesh
rather than the desire to be guided by the spirit of Yahweh which would
have led them to spread abroad to repeople the earth according to the Divine
command. The first results of this rebellion against God's purpose was
the building of a tower "whose top may reach unto heaven," to magnify their
accomplishments and also as a testimony to human greatness; that is, that
they might make a name for themselves. (Genesis 11:1-9)
Being in opposition to their plan, Yahweh
brought about the confusion of tongues, causing those of different languages
to band together, with the result that there were many separated groups
and unity of purpose was halted. In commemoration of this event, the tower
which they were attempting to build was named Babel; that is, confusion.
"WHEN THE MOST HIGH DIVIDED TO THE NATIONS THEIR INHERITANCE, when he separated
the sons of Adam, HE SET THE BOUNDS OF THE PEOPLE ACCORDING TO THE NUMBER
OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL." (Deuteronomy 32:8)
Separation of Abraham
Perhaps the greatest act of segregation
was the calling of Abraham out of Ur of the Chaldees. In so doing the ultimate
objective was that Abraham and his descendants were to be completely set
apart from the nations around them. Abraham was even called upon TO SEPARATE
HIMSELF FROM HIS OWN KINSMEN in order that Yahweh might set in motion His
purpose to make of him and his seed a special people.
Later on Moses informed Israel that they
were a "holy" people; that is, they were a people SET APART unto Yahweh.
Yahweh had chosen them to be a "peculiar" people (i.e., a special treasure)
above all the nations dwelling upon the face of the earth. (Deuteronomy
At this point many of the Judeo-Christians,
their clergy, and teachers will say that God has no special race.
You have heard many sermons by the Judeo-Christian
preachers, one in particular, which would have you believe that the Blacks,
Jews, Mexicans and all the other races are God's Chosen people; who
were crying out that there is no Chosen Race, or People. This is a damnable,
and provable lie. There is a Chosen Race and People in the Scriptures.
The following very clearly shows this, and there are many more that I could
have listed, but these should suffice.
"For thou art an holy people unto the LORD
thy God: THE LORD THY GOD HATH CHOSEN THEE TO BE A SPECIAL PEOPLE UNTO
HIMSELF, ABOVE ALL PEOPLE THAT ARE UPON THE FACE OF THE EARTH. The LORD
DID NOT SET HIS LOVE UPON YOU, NOR CHOOSE YOU, because ye were more in
number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: BUT BECAUSE
THE LORD LOVED YOU, and BECAUSE HE WOULD KEEP THE OATH WHICH HE HAD SWORN
UNTO YOUR FATHERS..." (Deuteronomy 7:6-8; 14:2; Isaiah 41:9; 43:1; 48:10;
My People Israel:
"Now the LORD had told Samuel in his ear
a day before Saul came, saying, To morrow about this time I will send thee
a man out of the land of Benjamin, and thou shalt anoint him to be captain
OVER MY PEOPLE ISRAEL, THAT HE MAY SAVE MY PEOPLE out of the hand of the
Philistines: for I HAVE LOOKED UPON MY PEOPLE, because their cry is come
unto me. And when Samuel saw Saul, the LORD said unto him, BEHOLD THE MAN
WHOM I SPAKE TO THEE OF THIS SAME SHALL REIGN OVER MY PEOPLE." (1 Samuel
9:15-17; 2 Samuel 3:18; 5:2; 7:7; 7:10-11; 1 Kings 6:13; 8:16; 14:7; 16:2;
1 Chronicles 11:2; 17:7; 17:9-10; 2 Chronicles 6:5-6; Jeremiah 7:12; 12:14;
23:13; 30:3; Ezekiel 14:9; 25:14; 36:12; 9:7; Daniel 9:20; Amos 7:8; 7:15;
"I HAVE MADE A COVENANT WITH MY CHOSEN,
I have sworn unto David my servant." (Psalm 89:3; Isaiah 43:20; 65:15)
I Have Chosen:
"BUT THOU, ISRAEL, ART MY SERVANT, JACOB
WHOM I HAVE CHOSEN, THE SEED OF ABRAHAM MY FRIEND. Thou whom I have taken
from the ends of the earth, and called thee from the chief men thereof,
and said unto thee, THOU ART MY SERVANT I HAVE CHOSEN THEE, and not cast
thee away. Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am
thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold
thee with the right hand of my righteousness. Behold, all they that were
incensed against thee shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as
nothing; and they that strive with thee shall perish. Thou shalt seek them,
and shalt not find them, even them that contended with thee: they that
war against thee shall be as nothing, and as a thing of nought. For I the
LORD thy God will hold thy right hand, saying unto thee, Fear not; I will
help thee. FEAR NOT, THOU WORM JACOB, AND YE MEN OF ISRAEL; I WILL HELP
THEE, SAITH THE LORD, AND THY REDEEMER, THE HOLY ONE OF ISRAEL." (Isaiah
41:8-14; 43:10; 44:1-2; John 13:18)
Thou Art My Servant:
"Thou whom I have taken from the ends of
the earth, and called thee from the chief men thereof, and said unto thee,
THOU ART MY SERVANT I HAVE CHOSEN THEE, and not cast thee away." (Isaiah
41:9; 44:21; 49:3)
Miscegenation An Abomination
- Part 9
His Chosen Ones:
"O YE SEED OF ISRAEL HIS SERVANT, YE CHILDREN
OF JACOB, HIS CHOSEN ONES.".(1 Chronicles 16:13; Psalms 135:4; Isaiah 41:8;
44:1; Acts 9:15)
These verses and many others disproves the
present-day propaganda line that all peoples are equal in every respect.
Moses states otherwise, for Yahweh Himself selected one race; the Anglo-Saxon,
Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic peoples, to be preferred above all others;
to be singled out for special training for a specific objective which is
stated in the Scriptures. Favoritism was not the reason, as ill-informed
Judeo-Christian, anti-Christ, and other critics like to contend, but selection
for service to Yahweh and to mankind was the ultimate plan according to
the Divine design. This too would call for the maintenance of purity of
A Wife For Isaac
The record clearly indicates that Abraham
was fully aware of what God required to maintain the purity of the racial
stock in order that his posterity would fulfill the Divine purpose and
secure the promised blessings. Therefore, he instructed the eldest servant
of his household that no wife should be taken from among the Canaanites
for his son Isaac, who was the forefather of the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic
peoples. He was to go into the country of Abraham's kindred and obtain
a wife for Isaac there.
The record of this Divinely-directed mission
and the selection of a wife for Isaac in the choosing of Rebekah is given
in detail in Genesis 24. Let those, today, who would break down all racial
barriers ponder well the implications involved in this inspired account
and its outcome. If, as present-day defamers of racial purity proclaim,
there is no difference between peoples and races, why did Abraham take
so much trouble under Divine direction in the selection of a wife for Isaac?
If God's people were forbidden to intermarry with the Canaanites, how much
more imperative is it that THEY SHOULD NOT INTERMARRY WITH THE NEGRO RACE.
Those who violate this prohibition are deliberately removing themselves
and their posterity from any participation in the blessings under the terms
of the Divine covenants, just as Esau did.
Esau Despised The Birthright
When Jacob and Esau, sons of Isaac and Rebekah,
became of age and were ready to take wives themselves, Esau, DESPISING
HIS BIRTHRIGHT, married two Hittite women, who were "a grief of mind" to
both Isaac and Rebekah. (Genesis 26:34-35)
"I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye
say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the
LORD: yet I loved Jacob, And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his
heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness." (Malachi 1:2-3; Romans
The parents of both Jacob and Esau were
fully aware of the necessity to adhere to the Divine requirement to remain
separated from the peoples around them, for only in so doing could Yahweh
fulfill through their seed the promises which had been given to Abraham,
Isaac, and later to Jacob/Israel. Esau, by refusing to abide by the required
segregation, removed himself from the birthright blessings as subsequent
events clearly reveal.
Jacob Receives The Birthright
Isaac summoned Jacob to him and confirmed
the blessing that Jacob had previously secured by trickery (However, when
one studies the scriptures closely, it would appear, that Esau did not
lose his birthright because of trickery on Jacob's part, he gave it up
willingly), for his father recognized the hand of Yahweh in it all as the
result of Esau's failure to conform with Divine requirements. Isaac charged
Jacob:"Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan." He was then
instructed to go to the house of his mother's father and take as his wife
a daughter of Laban, his mother's brother. (Genesis 28:1-2)
Isaac then said to Jacob: "And God Almighty
bless thee, and make thee fruitful, and multiply thee, that thou mayest
be a multitude of people and give thee the blessing of Abraham, to thee,
and to thy seed with thee." (Genesis 28:3-4)
Let us note the reaction of all this upon
Esau. When he heard the instructions his father had given to Jacob, warning
him not to take a wife of the daughters of Canaan, he realized what his
own conduct had cost him. "And Esau seeing that the daughters of Canaan
pleased not Isaac his father; Then went Esau unto Ishmael, and took unto
the wives which he had (Two Hittite - Canaanite wives) Mahalath the daughter
of Ishmael Abraham's son, the sister of Nebajoth, to be his wife." (Genesis
Nevertheless, Esau, still unable or unwilling
to conform with the stipulations of the divine injunction, married a half-breed
woman, for, while Ishmael was Abraham's son, his mother was an Egyptians.
Ishmael was born to Abraham and Hagar before the covenant was established
in Isaac, the son of Sarah. Esau was till out of step with the Divine purpose
in the selection of wives. Jacob, on the other hand, complied with the
requirements, married two daughters of Laban, Leah and Rachel.
The Ethiopian Woman; Moses's
Later on, through Moses, God reiterated
His instructions to His people to remain segregated from the peoples around
them: "Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt
not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son."
Those who are, today, bent on ignoring these
divine instruction cite the case of Moses wherein it is stated that he
married an Ethiopian woman. Pointing to this as evidence that Moses crossed
the color barrier, they assert that he married a Negro. Nothing is further
from the truth. "A great deal of nonsense has been written and taught about
this Ethiopian' wife of Moses. The use of the term Ethiopian' in referring
to Moses' wife has prevented many from understanding to whom reference
was made. (Primogenesis, by Howard B. Rand, Destiny Publishers, Merrimac,
Miriam and Aaron described her in that way
to voice their contempt for her. "The first and major question to be answered
is: Where is the Ethiopia to which they were referring as the country from
which Moses' wife came? Rev. W.M.H. Milner has this to say about Cush and
Ethiopia in his booklet, "The Russian Chapters of Ezekiel, Destiny Publishers,
Merrimac, Mass.) "In Bible geography there were TWO Cushite areas: one
in Asia and one in Africa. Similarly, the Greek writers allow for an Eastern
and Western Ethiopia.' Arabia was apart of ancient Eastern Ethiopia and
there the Midianites resided. With these facts in mind we realize it was
in Arabia that Moses married Zapporah, his Midianite wife, the daughter
of Jethro, the Priest of the Midianites. She was a Cushite from the Asiatic
land of Cush and though actually a Midianite, she could be called an Ethiopian."
(The Russian Chapters of Ezekiel, p. 229)
Midian was a son of Abraham by Keturah,
whom he married after the death of Sarah, the mother of Isaac. The Midianites
were, therefore, descendants of Abraham through Keturah; thus, the Ethiopian
whom Moses married was a woman of the Abrahamic line.
Miscegenation An Abomination
- Part 10
Segregation A Fundamental
Segregation is a fundamental principle that
God's people were enjoined to observe. Even when a woman became a widow
she was not to marry a stranger, but her dead husband's brother was to
take her as his wife. (Deuteronomy 25:5)
The Scriptures specify a strict separation
of the sexes in their mode of behavior. The distinctions were to be observed
in the deportment of each: there is the acceptable sphere of man before
God and the acceptable sphere of woman. Each is to maintain his or her
position in society accordingly. Even in wearing apparel there was not
to be that lack of carefulness in respect to the style of clothing which
identifies the man and the woman, which would contribute to the confusion
of the sexes.
Yahweh stated through Moses: "The woman
shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put
on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination (disgusting) unto
the Lord." (Deuteronomy 22:5)
Abomination: Brown-Diver-Briggs' Definition:
#8441 tow` ebah or to` ebah-a disgusting thing, abomination, abominable
a) in ritual sense (used of unclean
food, idols, mixed marriages)
The violation of this injunction as to the
manner of dress is altogether too prevalent today. It is, indeed, a contributing
factor in the breakdown of respect for the opposite sex and contributes
to moral laxity.
b) in ethical sense (used of wickedness,
In the temple worship the segregation of
men and women was the rule. The description of the Temple of Herod, which
was in existence during the days of Yeashua's ministry, shows how this
A New Dispensation
The Divine intentions of the prohibitory
injunction of Scriptures that enjoin the separation of the races and the
sexes have never been abrogated. The New Testament has in no wise repudiated
any of the Divine instructions, modern Judeo-Christian theologians to the
contrary notwithstanding. Their application throughout the changed conditions
of a new dispensation. All those who become Christians, however, are earnestly
advised to accept these Scriptural teachings. They are also admonished
to separate themselves from the world, its pleasures and its temptations.
As pointed out by Paul: "Be ye not unequally
yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness
with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And
what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth
with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols?
for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell
in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my
people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the
Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will
be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the
Lord Almighty." (2 Corinthians 6:14-18)
The acceptance of Christ as personal Savior
does not grant a license to break any of the prohibitory requirements set
forth in the Scriptures. As a matter of fact, following the call of Yahweh
and the acceptance of Christ, the Christian will endeavor to keep those
laws better than they were being observed by the scribes and Pharisees.
Christ emphasized this when He said to His followers: "I say unto you,
That except your righteousness (The keeping of the law) shall exceed the
righteousness (The observance of the law) of the scribes and Pharisees,
ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 5:20)
His exhortation followed by Yeashua's statement
that He did not come to destroy the law but to fulfill prophecy. He then
stated: "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments,
and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of
heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called
great in the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 5:19)
Fruit of the Spirit
It may be said that he or she who is a Christian
is a brother or sister in Christ. However, this spiritual relationship
in Christ still does not grant a license to violate the prohibitory laws
of Yehweh or repudiate His injunctions for the maintenance of racial purity.
Furthermore, a true brother and sister in Christ will show forth in their
consideration of the remainder of His household the attributes of the fruit
of the Spirit which are: "Love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness,
goodness, faith, meekness, temperance: against such there is no law." (Galatians
Those who are striving to bear the fruit
of the Spirit would not under any circumstances willfully violate any Scriptural
directive: nor would they seek to cross color lines in violation of Divine
injunctions. The attitude of the overcoming Christian brings him into conformity
with the requirements of the law. Therefore, Paul could say, "Against such
there is no law." Paul declared further that if our lives are governed
by the Spirit, our conduct will conform as we "walk in the Spirit": "Let
us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another."
The Present Crisis
This brings us to the problems facing our
nation today; the racial issue and segregation. If the attributes of the
fruit of the Spirit were manifested by all persons involved, there would
be no provoking of one another, no envying, nor any undertaking to break
down barriers which have supported racial segregation.
As one listens to the ill-conceived pronouncements
of those purporting to be leaders among us, we become more and more aware
of a systematic process of brainwashing that has rendered their thinking
sterile and drained their minds of common sense. To listen to their pronouncements,
one would suppose the Constitution of the United States grants the right
to all, regardless of race or color, to have access, not only to public
paces but to private institutions as well. Actually the Constitution grants
no sweeping privileges to anyone. There are certain public facilities which
are completely out of bounds for large segments of our people and should
always remain so. No man and no woman has any constitutional right whatever
to enter places marked exclusively for the opposite sex. The breakdown
of segregation in this respect would most certainly contribute to immorality.
There is actually no loss of constitutional
rights in separate and equal facilities in the maintenance of racial segregation
any more than there is such a loss in separate lounges for the sexes. TO
CLAIM OTHERWISE IS BUT A SUBTERFUGE TO CONCEAL THE DESIRE TO BREAK DOWN
DIVINELY-ESTABLISHED RACIAL BARRIERS. Will the next step be a move to compel
access of all races to equality of living facilities, even to the sharing
of homes? Already a public fully brainwashed to the extent that equality
under the law insofar as justice and equity is concerned means the erasing
of all barriers to promiscuous racial mingling may awaken later to find
the privacy of their homes greatly impaired.
Miscegenation An Abomination
- Part 11
The Constitution of the United States cannot
be construed (By reasonable and moral men/women) as lawfully granting to
anyone the right to ignore the commandments of god or violate the prohibitory
injunctions of the Scriptures. The Supreme Court decision to set aside
segregation of the races is definitely contrary to the Divine purpose and
its ultimate objective will destroy the purity of pedigree which Yahweh
enjoined our forefathers to guard with all diligence.
The following excerpt reveals the extent
to which intermarriage is already considered a foregone conclusion as the
inevitable outcome of desegregation: "Scan the Negro press. Here, as an
example, is a quotation from the Pittsburgh Courier, a leading Negro weekly,
for August 15, 1959: "The Negro phoebes and crackerologists are ever shouting
warnings that this or that lowering of racial barriers will lead inevitably
to intermarriage and intermixture. Well, I say that's just fine and exactly
what this nation needs to maintain its world supremacy...We live in an
unwholesome clandestine atmosphere in which we whisper of healthy love
and erases across the color line but fear to speak out boldly...
Every community worth its salt should have
a frankly interracial club or association where the boys and gals, colored
and white, could associate, drink and dance...Of course we favor racial
mixing, including marriage, and are working openly to kill all racially
restrictive legislation and social segregation and discrimination.'
I have before me a copy of the Negro Magazine
Ebony for February, 1960. On page 66 there is a picture of a Negro next
to a picture of a White girl. Under the picture of the Negro is the following
caption: Hebrew Holy charm around Sammy's neck is gift from Eddie Cantor.
Planning to marry the Canadian blonde, Sammy says: the Bible says, take
unto yourself a wife.' And it don't say nothing about her color.'
May I also quote an interview with Congressman
Adam Clayton Powell appearing in the United States News and World Report
on September 5, 1952:
Q. What is the attitude of the Negro in
the United States on the subject of intermarriage? Is it discussed frequently
in the press?'
A: Yes, but on an objective basis. In fact,
an increasingly large number of Negro leaders are marrying whites of extremely
stable and respected families.'
Q. Is there much more fraternizing in the
Northern cities between Negroes and whites, especially in the large Negro
centers like Harlem, than there used to be?'
A. Yes, much more.'
Q. Is there any tendency among the Negroes
to reject that, or are they welcoming it?'
A. they are very definitely welcoming it.
An increasing number of fine leaders on both sides are marrying.'
Q. What is the argument that is used by
Negro leaders in answer to the point that is sometimes made that, if intermarriages
continue in the next 25 to 30 years, then the races will be adulterated
somewhat as they are in Cuba and Brazil?'
A. I have heard that argument, but it doesn't
amount to any argument at all from my standpoint, because if we are fighting
for integration, well then there it is. I mean, you can't fight against
segregation and want separation. We must be consistent.'
Q. I'm not sure that that is clear.'
A. The Negro leaders are fighting against
segregation. Therefore, they can't have a position on the one hand against
segregation and on the other hand against interracial marriage.'" (Race
and Reason, by Carleton Putnam, pp. 38-39)
Let those who contend that desegregation
does not lead to intermarriage, with the outcome the ultimate adulteration
of the White race, consider well these statements made by Negro leaders
and appearing in their own publications. Although possibly unknown to some,
but definitely the purpose of those who are Satanically-inspired, but one
end is in view and that is the destruction of the Race of the Book with
whom God made an everlasting covenant. They were an appointed people from
the very beginning.
The First Jews; The Mixed
Today heathen peoples are in eruption; the
colored races are in open rebellion. The Negroes are being aroused to aspire
to usurp or else destroy the White man's heritage; an inheritance to which,
as a race, they have no right. It was when speaking of God's people Israel
that the Psalmist proclaimed: "Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord;
and the people whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance." (Psalm 33:12)
Dr. Ralph J. Bunche has stated that "white
supremacy" is rapidly declining and he warned that the colored races are
determined to end "racial prejudice" and "discrimination." He went on to
observe that the world today is overwhelmingly a non-white world, with
new voices of yellow, brown and black men commanding attention in national
and international councils.
Is the driving force behind the race agitation
the mulatto? He has no firm place in society with either race; therefore,
he would naturally desire that all racial barriers be broken down in order
to make a place for himself in an "integrated" society. Yet his own unfortunate
condition is itself a prime argument against the crossing of color lines
which gave him birth.
Not all Negroes want desegregation. In Economic
Council Letter No. 504, for June 1, 1961, the following information is
given: "Take the so-called civil rights situation, for instance. A few
weeks ago we talked with a young salesman in a certain city in Florida,
and he told us that the great mass of Negroes in the South are not interested
in integration. They are interested, he said, in advancing themselves and
attaining the utmost possible benefit for themselves.
He cited the pastor of a large Negro church
in that city, who was opposed to integration and preached against it. He
added that the White Sheriff of the country had such confidence in this
Negro preacher that when, occasionally young Negroes got into trouble,
he would have them assigned to the custody of this minister."
It was the mixed multitude (The first Jews)
among ancient Israel, who accompanied them out of Egypt, (Exodus 12:38)
who were a source of much trouble for the nation: "And the mixt multitude
that was among them fell a lusting: and the children of Israel also wept."(Numbers
The Rt. Rev. Richard S. Emrich, Episcopal
bishop of Michigan, typifies the weeping in Israel today as he gave support
tot he desires of the mixed multitude in our midst. Despising his own birthright,
he even challenges God, who separated the races and selected a people to
be set apart from all others: "For you are a people consecrated to the
Lord your God, the Lord you God having chosen you out of all the peoples
that are on the face of the earth to be a people of his very own.: (Deuteronomy
7:6,Smith & Goodspeed Translation)
Yahweh Himself recognized that there is
a marked distinction between individuals and among races as well, yet the
Bishop had the effrontery to state that this "is a lie straight from the
mouth of hell." In view of what the Bible teaches about races, the declaration
of the Bishop that to defend racial superiority is "to declare war on Christ
and on western civilization" is, on his part, to preach confusion of the
first water. How appropriately our Lord describes such men as "blind leaders
leading the blind."
Miscegenation An Abomination
- Part 12
The term "superiority of race" need not
raise the hackles of violent disagreement, for it simply means that superior
talents were given to a race to enable them to bear a greater burden of
responsibility in service to God and mankind. No man may question this,
for it was God's prerogative to do what He willed in this respect: "But
now thus saith the Lord that created thee, O Jacob, and he that formed
thee, O Israel, Fear not: for I have redeemed thee. I have called thee
by thy name: thou art mine...For I am the Lord thy God, the Holy One of
Israel, thy Saviour: I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for
thee. Since thou wast precious in my sight, thou has been honourable, and
I have loved thee: therefore will I give men for thee, and people for thy
life." (Isaiah 45:1, 3-4)
Every race manifests certain identifying
characteristics and no two races are alike. Racial talents may e in varying
degrees of importance, but every race has something of value to contribute
to mankind. In every race there are educated and refined individuals who
seem to rise above the average of their fellows.
As editorially stated in the Manchester
Union (New Hampshire): "There are educated Negroes in Africa and, of course,
fine, educated Negroes in the South. But there are many primitive, almost
half-savage Negroes in both Africa and the South. They can be easily aroused
and stirred into wild, uncontrolled emotions. When this occurs, it naturally
arouses equally strong emotions on the part of the southern white men and
women who rise to defend their homes and their children."
The following excerpt is quoted from the
column y David Lawrence in The Boston Herald, for May 31, 1961, a portion
of it under the heading, "The Face of A Stranger": "What is the 'no-violence'
tactic that produces outbursts of violence? One elderly woman, who is a
keen observer, writes from Atlanta, Georgia to this correspondent as follows:
I shant attempt to argue the merits or demerits of segregation. What has
been upsetting me is what is happening to us. Take me, and I am only one
of hundreds of thousands of Southerners; and we are all alike. I was brought
up to feel quite deeply that courtesy to others was an obligation to myself,
and the fact that some of these others might not be so fortunate as I only
deepened the obligation.
The sort of thing which is heralded now
as racial prejudice' simply never occurred to us. A black face was the
face of a friend, and if the friend stood in need of hep; it was our responsibility
o offer that help.
A black face today, however, is not what
it was a few years ago. It is the face of a stranger; and behind it who
knows what is going on? We have learned what furious, impotent rage is,
and the miracle is that the South has exercised, and still is exercising
the control that it has.
The best method of learning is the trolley.
There you can quickly learn just how angry a human being an get; and although
you are not yourself the sort of person who goes berserk, you can understand
the one who does.
There are many other places, and times,
but let me try to make you see what is a daily, hourly occurrence. You
wait at the stop for the trolley. As it slows, Negroes; with only the barest
difference between a push' and a shove' brush you aside in clumsy haste
to show their equality by getting on ahead of you. When you get on, there
is a Negro on each seat, all down both sides, and every Negro bursting
with zeal, their eyes glimmering, a grin on each face as they wait for
your move. You stand; after all, it's a free country and the law which
says they can sit by you hasn't yet said that you have to sit by them.
Then it starts. The snickers, the snide remarks across the aisle or to
the opposite end of the car. And every one of them aimed at you. On and
on and on. How much of it can you take?
Various provocative remarks are made; they
are common enough, and also: We showed them in Congolia. We're gonna show
them here. We're gonna have a Congolia of our own right here. They'll learn.'
I am horrified myself at the gradual change
which has taken place in myself but it has been brought about by these
demonstrators' and the continual nagging of the Northern press, radio
and TV. I do not condone violence, but I have learned to understand it,
and that is knowledge I would give anything not to have.'
These words emphasize the dilemma of the
hour, irrespective of the Constitutional issues involved in the controversy."
Plain of Judgment
As pointed out in the article, "Their Wickedness
is Great," in the reprint titled The Full Cup, we are today in the third
stage of the transitory period specifically marked by mob activities. Joel
expressed this as "multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision." Ferrar
Fenton renders this "crowds upon crowds on the Plain of the Judgment."
(Joel 3:14) The prophet declares that at that time the Day of the Lord
will have arrived on the plain where the Lord fixes the doom of those in
rebellion against Him.
The "crowds upon crowds" denote mob action.
We have been observing the increase of this type of disturbance in many
countries, particularly in the savagery displayed in various African countries.
Now, as a result of the stupidity of the white race in allowing themselves
to be swayed by subversive propaganda into favoring so-called "racial equality,"
violent mob action is coming to the fore within our own land over the issue
of racial segregation. The inevitable results, as they were typified in
the vision given to George Washington, the "father" of our country, at
Valley Forge, bode ill for al concerned. In that vision Washington saw
the dark clouds of conflict rising in Africa and finally settling down
in murky blackness over the United States of America.
Under Divine Duress
There is no comfort for the Negro in the
ultimate outcome unless his attitude is changed, for he will not come into
possession of that to which he now aspires. God has selected His people
Israel; the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Celtic peoples who are the White Race,
as those through whom justice and equity will be established in the world.
They alone are commissioned to prepare the way for the blessings of righteous
administration to be institut4d so that all peoples and races may benefit
thereby. This is not a role for the Negro race to fill for, left to themselves,
they would revert to type; what is now occurring in the land of Africa
amply demonstrates the truth of this statement.
However, neither is there any comfort for
the White Race in the trend of events at the present time, for, having
despised their own birthright, they face a time of slaughter and destruction
made inevitable by their obstinacy and waywardness. We are indeed living
in a day of trumpet and alarm. It will only be when the people of God experience
a genuine spiritual awakening, arise to an appreciation of the responsibility
of their heritage and firmly seize the reigns of administration that equality
in justice before the law will become the portion of all. In that day the
stranger within, as well as all races regardless of color, will enjoy benefits
never known before under the administration of the Law of God.
"The fight against Germany
has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference,
in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons
for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance.
We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against
Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to
recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests
call for the complete destruction of Germany..." (Valadimir Jabotinsky,
in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934)