Judaism - Talmud
Parts 31 through 36
By Willie Martin

Jew Watch

Judaism - Talmud - Part 31

 Oral Law

 See the Bible versus Oral Law; it is always superior to the Bible. (Sanhedrin 59a) What makes the Talmudists "God's Chosen People" is only the Pharisees "Oral Law," or Babylonian Talmud, they say.

 Parents

 The Bible, through Moses, teaches that anyone who strikes or curses his parents is worthy of death. But the Pharisee "Sages" have improved upon that. One may strike parents to the point of wounding them, while they are alive, but the sky is the limit after they are dead. Ah! What a privilege to follow the Oral Law or Talmud!

 Nor is that all that the "Chosen People" are sanctioned in doing. They may curse their parents providing they use any term meaning God except the Y-H-W-H consonants of the word Jehovah, the Tetragammaton, which is reserved for the Big Shots to use in whistling up demons. The word "God" is not supposed to be written or spoken today, and the California Jewish Voice carried an article in which the word is spelled "G-D" throughout. Not piety but sheer superstition governs this. And one of Christ's major "crimes" was that He pronounced the Name as spelled (Sanhedrin 55b-56a) from the "chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud" Sanhedrin. In this, it is explained that "Bless" is used instead of "Curse," in Talmudic double-talk style. This style has been necessary until the Jews could get an Iron Curtain power in their hands, to conceal a wholly criminal religion which is a blasphemy and conspiracy against the rest of the entire human race, but Christianity and its follower!
s fi
rst.

 Moses said that anyone who cursed or struck mother or father should be put to death (Exodus 21:15, 17 Leviticus 20:9; Deuteronomy 27:16). One must honor parents.

 Christ on Parents

 Sanhedrin 66a; 85b: Christ knew Pharisee doctrine. He knew the Pharisee custom of drizzling water alternately on the hand to chase off the demons on arising, and before eating, for demons supposedly live in water and go for it. It is the push broom which dislodges and refunnels them. Tashlik is the current and ancient Pharisee custom of dropping crumbs into a river or body of water at Rosh Hashona, or flapping the garments at them, as the Hasidim do, to appease them. Brooklyn and Manhattan bridges in New York are much used for this today, says the Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, ("Tashlik")

 "Yad" is hand and "Yadayim," the plural, hands. The Talmud book of Yadayim is devoted to the hand washing in connection with the demonology of Pharisaism to which Christ objected. So, when the Pharisees came baiting Him about His Apostles not doing the hand washing act (Matthew 15:2; Mark 7:3) act, He came back at them, saying that they were hypocrites, "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men...Full well ye reject the commandment of God that ye may keep your own tradition.

 "For Moses said, Honour father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death; "But ye say, if a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corhan, that is to say a gift (Or I have dedicated to God that which would relieve your need)...ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother: making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered, and many such like things ye do." (Mark 7:1-13) Matthew 15 contains the same denunciation and same quotation from Isaiah, calling them hypocrites, etc.

 Christ was hated by the pagan Pharisees for such teachings as: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill...Whosoever therefore shall break one of the least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven...except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 5:17-20)

 Polygamy

 There is nothing now, as formerly, in Talmudic doctrine, against polygamy. It is practiced by Jews in countries where it is allowed. It was Rabbi Gershom Ben Judah (born Metz, 960; died Mayence, France, 1040 A.D.) whose edicts were accepted by European Jewry as final for all time, who commanded Jews in Christian countries to stop getting into trouble with the law by polygamy. Israel first proposed extra allowances for plural wives but now seems to be screening polygamy from Christian eyes.

 After the period of the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and before this, in the case of Adam, and Noah, Monogamy ruled. The Prophets were Monogamists, Moses commanded regarding a man of God that: "That neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away..." (Deuteronomy 17:17) And, admittedly, the polygamy of David and his son Solomon ended the Israel thirteen tribe united kingdom. Their hordes of pagan wives with foul altars broke down any Gody spirit which had formerly united them. The Pharisee "Sages" embrolder upon the above words of Moses against polygamy, their permission to have 18, 24 or 48 wives. (Sanhedrin 20b-21a)

 The Mishna asks: "Why then is it written neither shall he multiply wives to himself...Rabbi Simeon said: He must not marry even one who may turn away his heart; (5) From which it might be inferred that he may marry a lesser number even if they should corrupt him."

 The 1952 book by "Salo Wittmayer Baron, Professor of Jewish History, Literature, and Institutions on the Miller Foundation, Columbia University" (Known as "Columbia the Germ of the Nation"), is entitled: "A Social and Religious History of the Jews" and is published by the American Jewish Committee's Jewish Publication Society of America. The chapter, "The World of the Talmud," cites the harem of King Solomon (which finished him morally and otherwise) saying its "memory kindled the imagination of polygamous Jews in subsequent ages." Although, we are told, there was no real difference between Palestinian and Babylonian Jewries fundamentally, "there are indications that Babylonian Jewish society had more polygamous features than did that of Palestine."

 Rabbis Advertise

 "Anecdotes like those current in regard to Rab and Rabbi Nahman (who) after arriving in a foreign city they used to advertise for women ready to marry them for the time of their sojourn (‘man havya le-yoma')...In law, too, the Babylonian emphasis lay upon the Jew's right to ‘marry as many wives as he is able to support'...Perhaps egged on by the growing Christians propaganda against divorce, the Hillelite school stressed the husband's freedom to divorce his wife even for some culinary deficiency, or, as Rabbi Anquiba (Akiba) taught, because he had found a better looking woman." And, if you doubt that the above Rabbis are "saints" of the "synagogue of Satan," as Christ: put it, then read up on them in the Jewish Encyclopedias.

 Under "Talmudic Eugenics," is this on incest: "In Egypt the Ptolemaic rulers themselves, for the most part, married their own sisters. In Parthia Persia, marriages between parents and children were valid, and those among brothers and sisters were quite customary. The Parsee religion...encouraged such marriages as the fittest mens of preserving family purity (‘Yasna' 12, 9)...Artaxerxes II had married his two daughters, and...Mithraidates I had married his mother. Ardea Viraz is said to have married his seven sister." (Talmudic Eugenics, Vol. II, p. 229)
 
 

Judaism - Talmud - Part 32

 "On one point, particularly, Roman law differed from Jewish; marriages between an uncle and a niece...We recall that both Rabbi Eliezer and Abba married nieces, as did Rabbi Jose the Galilean... Rabbi Idumael made a special effort to overrule his vow (not to marry his own niece) and to make the niece more attractive to him by improving her teeth..." (Talmudic Eugenics, Vol. II, p. 230) That both business shows his nobility?

 Although Moses commanded, in God's name, that a woman should not marry her uncle, or a man his aunt (Leviticus 18:14), these "People of the Book" today are fighting to modify American state laws against such marriages, and have been successful in some states, on the ground that their "religion" requires such latitude. And the dumb Judeo-Christian (sic) parrot the lie that "Judaism" is founded on Mosaic law, the Old Testament!

 Popes

 The History of the Jewish Talmud, Introduction p. 2; pp. 66, 68: Rodkinson (M. Levi Frumkin) in the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud, edited by the father of "Reform" Rabbis, Isaac M. Wise, which includes a "History of the Talmud," puts his finger on the real cause of trouble between the czarist governments of Russia and the Talmudic Jews. This work was put out in 190, which was before the 1904 Kuhn-Leob-financed Japanese-Russian war culminated in the bloody Talmudic Communist Revolution of 1905 in Russia. At the celebration of the 1917 final triumph of Jewry, at Carnegie Hal in N.Y. (N.Y. Times 3/24/1917), it was proudly told how Jacob Schiff had financed Communist propaganda spread among 50,000 Russian war prisoners in Jew-financed Japan, which sent them back to put over the 1905 Communist Revolution in their Russian homeland. But Rodkinson tells what was wrong.

 Writing of the battles of the Talmud, and its followers, authored by the Pharisees (History of the Talmud, Chapter One), we read that following the Sadducees, Samaritans, the followers of Jesus and the early Roman (pagan) emperors. (History of the Talmud, Introduction): "The Rabbis next encountered the Popes. From the time of Pope Innocent III, the Talmud was burned at the stake in nearly every century from the 11th to the 18th in Italy, France, Germany, Spain, and many other countries..." He speaks of the disputations which the Popes and kings held in which the accusers of that Talmud were answered by its defenders. The results were always that, the criminality of the Talmud being revealed in all its horror, the Talmud was ordered burned, expunged or censored, until the same thing started over again. Rodkinson continues: "Still today, and not one letter in it is missing."

 Rodkinson "Spills the Beans"

 Then:: "It is true that persecutions against it are not yet at an end; accusations and calumnies by its enemies, under the new name of anti-Semites, are still directed against it, while the government of Russia legislates against and restricts the rights of the NATION WHICH ADHERES TO THE TALMUD." (The History of the Talmud, Introduction) But, Rodkinson expects the sub-sewer Talmud to reign eternally "as long as the sky spans the earth." (He reckons without God)

 Talmud Burned

 A partial chart of the burning of the Talmud at the hands of the Kings and Popes appears in The Talmud At The Stake, p. 117-118.

 The Popes in the Jewish Talmud

 Jewish Encyclopedia gave credit to the Popes for stopping violence against them for seeking to convert them, and securing certain rights for them in territories over which they exercised temporal power. Although the Bishops were issuing restrictive laws against Jewish aggressions long before this, the reign of Gregory the Great (590-604 A.D.) is taken as the starting point of consistent relations between the Jews and the People. He condemned the holding of Christian slaves by Jews.

 Pope Leo VII: Wrote the Archbishop of Mayence a reply telling him he might offer his Jews the choice between conversion or emigrating.

 Anacleus II (antipope): Was a Jew and his claim to the papacy has always been contested.

 Benedictus VIII: Had a number of Jews put to death for blasphemy against Jesus.

 Gregory VII: Charged the German emperor, Henry IV, with favoritism towards the Jew, and "in 1078 A.D., he renewed the canonical laws which prohibited giving Jews power over Christians...Jews might not be employed as tax-farmers or mint-masters.

 Popes Calixtus II (1119-1124 A.D.) and Pope Alexander III: Are cited for pro-Jewish acts.

 Innocent III: Is the most hated of the Popes, in Jewish literature. In 1215 A.D., the Fourth Lateral Council which he convened "renewed the old canonical prohibitions against trusting the Jews with public offices and introduced the law demanding that Jews should wear a distinctive sign on their garments (a yellow badge; this is where the tradition of tying yellow ribbons on trees and etc., which is prevalent in this country today came from)...Nevertheless he protected them against the fury of the French Crusaders." Under "Badge" is more on this.

 Gregory IX: "in various official documents insisted on the strict execution of the canonical laws against the Jews...his successor," to continue quoting.

 Innocent IV: "Ordered the burning of the Talmud in Paris." (1244 A.D.)

 Through Emperor Sigismund: "who was heavily indebted to them, they (the Jews) obtained from Pope Martin V (1417-1431 A.D.) ...various bulls (1418 and 1422 A.D.; favorable to them). "In the last years of his pontificate, however, he repeated several of his ordinances, charging that they had been obtained under false pretenses."

 Eugene IV and Nicholas V: Are cited for moderation.

 Sixtus IV: Sanctioned the Spanish Inquisition, which was aimed at the 300,000 Jews who had entered the Church, retained their Talmudism, and secured power over all phases of Spanish life. (See "The Marrano's," by Cecil Roth, Jewish Publication Society of America)

 Alexander VI (Borgia): Known in history as the most profligate of the popes, was rather favorably inclined toward the Jews."

 Leo X: One of the Medicis who fanned the Reformation by sponsoring the great renaissance of paganism and filled the Platonic Academy and salons of Rome and Florence with Jews, expounding Talmud, and occult Cabala, is called "the humanist...favorably inclined toward the Jews, whom he employed not only as physicians, but also as artists and in other positions at his court. The beginning of the Reformation influenced his action in the controversy between Reuchlin and Pfefferkorn (the capitalization indicating that these subjects are covered elsewhere in the Jewish Encyclopedia) which he settled in such a way as not to give any encouragement to those who demanded reforms in the Church." True enough. The story of the sincerely converted Jew, Pfefferkorn, who aired the infamies of the Talmud truly, opposed by the Catholic renegade, dupe of the head of the Jewish community of Rome, Reuchlin, and the pro-Jewish Medici Pope, ended with Pfefferkorn being silenced, Reuchlin not tried for heresy, as he was scheduled to be and should have been, and two hostile camps in every German town taking sides for or against the Talmud.
 


Judaism - Talmud - Part 33

 How Martin Luther entered this picture, first as a daring of the Jews, when he wrote the drooling "Jesus Christ Was Born A Jew" in which he blamed the Catholic hierarchy for being responsible for Jews not having been converted; they called Jews nasty names, and asserting that he, Luther welcomed them to his heart, is a picture unpainted by Catholic or Protestant sources. We are never told how he found that Jews who had encouraged him to break with the Church were Judaizing his followers. He then read the Talmud introduced to him by a really converted Jew. Then he wrote "The Jews and their Lies" and such terrible philippics that they make the utterances of the Popes almost pale by comparison after he became wised up to the truth.

 Today the Bulls of the Popes are buried alongside of those of Luther!

 Clement VII (another Jew)was the bastard son of Guilio, brother of Lorenzo the Magnificent, founder of the pagan salon, the Platonic Academy.

 How The Medicis Gained The Throne

 Lorenzo the Magnificent, politician and lord of his Platonic Academy which attempted the old Talmudic strategy of harmonizing pagan philosophy with Christianity, as Maimonides had done with Biblical Judaism and Aristotle, had his son Giovanni (Leo X) made a cardinal, through his influence with Innocent VIII, at 1, having been made an archbishop at 7. Ready to pop on the throne, Giovanni promptly made five of his relatives cardinals, including his bastard cousin, Ginlio. Leo X (Giovanni), made Pope on March 11, 1513, was ordained a priest on the 15th and made a bishop on the 19th of the same month, and he reigned until December 1,1521, nine years.

 It was Leo X who launched the selling of indulgences in 1517 A.D., which was the immediate forerunner of Luther's break with the Church, and of Europe's arousal. Every effort was made to corrupt and Talmudize the church from the inside, whole Jewry worked to wreck it from the outside. The hotheads among Jews, say Cecil Roth, the Jewish historian expected to end Christianity and supplant it with Talmudism, but when Luther nailed the theses on the Wittenberg Cathedral door, he nailed the Jews back in the ghetto, and Popes eager for Christian faith in the ghetto, and Popes eager for Christian faith and morals were elected in place of the pro-Talmudic "humanist" Medici popes. Luther, in turn, found the same forces polluting his own following and ended his life beseeching the Protestant prices to expel or put at hard labor al Talmudists, after burning synagogues and Talmuds first of all. Read his words if you can find them in any library.

 There is only praise for the Medici Popes in Jewish literature and only disappointment about the condition of Jewry during the Reformation and afterwards, for the succeeding Popes drove the Talmudists out of Vatican circles and back into the ghetto until some time about 1880.

 Bewailing this, the Jewish Encyclopedia, reports how the Talmud was burned by Pope Julius III in 1553 A.D., and Christians prohibited from printing it. "The worst was yet to come," Paul IV (1555-1559 A.D.) in his bull "Cum Nimis Absurdum" not only renewed all the canonical restrictions on Jews, but restricted their commercial activities and made them wear a yellow hat and made them live in their own territory; the ghetto.

 Pope Pius IV: Gave "a brief period of respite" (1566-1572 A.D.) then his successor Pius V (1566-1572 A.D.) "not only repealed all the concessions of his predecessor, and not only renewed the laws of Paul IV, but added some new restrictions..." In 1569 A.D., he expelled the Jews from his territory.

 Gregory XIII (1572-1585): Allowed the Jews to return but "introduced a large number of severe restrictions...and they were obliged to send every week at least 150 or their number" to listen to conversionist sermons (dreadful ones).

 Sixtus V (1585-1590): ‘was more favorable to the Jews," and permitted the printing of the Talmud after it was censored (1586).

 Clement VIII (1592-1604): Ordered the Jews expelled and prohibited printing of the Talmud.

 Under Clement X (1670-1676): The Portugal Inquisition (against Jewry) was halted but he refused to help the expelled Jews of Vienna (1670). "The worst feature...under papal dominion was the closing of the gates of the Roman ghetto nights. Severe penalties awaited a Jew leaving the ghetto after dark, or a Christian entering it."

 Pius VI (1775-1800): "renewed all the restrictions enacted from the 13th century. The censorship of books was strictly enforced...and their attendance at conversionist sermons was enforced."

 Leo XII (1826): Reinforced these rules with extreme rigor.

 Pius IX (1846-1878): Started in soft but, as stated in other Jewish literature, after he had been expelled from Rome at the hands of a Jewish movement which showed its Talmudic anti-Christian face with savagery, he changed his mind. To Quote: "Pius IX During the first two years of his pontificate, was evidently inclined to adopt a liberal attitude, but after his return from exile he...condemned as abominable laws all measures which gave political freedom to them...showed his approval of the medieval laws as enacted by Innocent III. He maintained the ghetto in Rome until it was abolished by the Italian occupation of Rome (1870)." (Jewish Encyclopedia, "Popes")

 Leo XII (1878-1903): Was the first pope who exercised no territorial jurisdiction over the Jews. His influence, nevertheless, was prejudicial to them. He encouraged anti-Semitism by bestowing distinctions on leading anti-Semitic politicians and authors, as Lueger and Drumont (Eduard Drumont's book, ‘LaFrance Juive' traces the Talmudization of French Christian life in every phase. A Judaized France was the result he deplored) he refused to interfere in behalf of Captain Dreyfus, or to issue a statement against the blood accusation (That human blood is used in Talmudic black magic rituals, and in during their Purim Celebrations). "In an official document he denounced JEWS, freemasons, and anarchists as the enemies of the Church."

 Pius X (elected 1903): Is not sufficiently known (This is in the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia) to permit a judgment...but in his diocese of Mantua, before he became pope, he had prohibited the celebration of a solemn mass on the king's birthday because the city council which asked for it had attended a celebration in the synagogue."

 19th and 20th Century Popes and Jews

 In 553 A.D., Emperor Justinian forbad the spread of the Talmudic books through out the Roman Empire (Corp. Juris can.VII Decretal, lib. V, Tit. IV, cap. 1) Popes Julius III, Paul IV, Plus V, Gregory XIII, Clement VIII, Alexander VII, Benedict XIV, etc., who issued ne editions of the Index of Forbidden Books, condemned them rigorously; in accord with the orders of the Council of Trent, proscribed them.

 The Index Expurgatorious issued by the above Leo XIII in 1887 stated concerning "The Talmud and other Jewish Books." "Although in the Index issued by Pope Pius IV, the Jewish Talmud with all its glossaries, annotations, interpretations and expositions were prohibited: but if published without the name Talmud and without its vile calumnies against the Christian religion they could be tolerated; however, Our Holy Lord Pope Clement VIII in his Constitution against impious writings and Jewish books, published in Rome in the year of Our Lord 1592...proscribed and condemned them: it was not his intention thereby to permit or tolerate them even under the above conditions; for he expressly and specifically stated and willed, that the impious Talmudic, Cabalistic and other nefarious books of the Jews be entirely condemned and that they must remain always condemned and prohibited, and that his Constitution about these books must be perpetually and inviolably observed."
 


Judaism - Talmud - Part 34

 In 1938

 The Vatican's semi-official organ, "L'Osservatore Romano," of August 13, 198, in an article headed "The Jews and the Vatican Council (1870), after speaking of the Protective measures for the Jews of the Catholic church, then goes on to say: "But; in order to set things straight, by this it was not intended that Jews should be allowed to abuse the hospitality of Christian countries. Along with these protective ordinances, there existed restrictive and precautionary decrees with regard to them. The civil power was in accord with the Church in this, since, as Delassus says, ‘they both had the same interest in preventing the nations from being invaded by the Jewish element and thereby losing control of society.' But if Christians were forbidden to force Jews to embrace the Catholic religion, to disturb their synagogues, their Sabbaths and their festivals, the Jews, on the other hand, were forbidden to hold public office, civil or military; and this prohibition extended even tot he children of converted Jews. The precautionary decrees concerned the professions, education, and business positions."

 Marranos

 One who reads the Jewish press today and sees congratulations to Israel from Spanish "Catholics" who identify themselves as Talmudic Jews who have practiced their Talmudism secretly ever since 1492, when their co-religionists were expelled from Spain, where 300,000 of them had taken over the Church from the inside, can realize the necessity of the precaution underlined above. The word "Convert" is so often false.

 One must learn from Jewish authorities that Torquemada himself, leading the Inquisition, was a Jew, and that the Inquisition was only aimed at the Marranos who under the pretense of conversion threatened to end Christianity by their inside job.

 Luther and Pope Innocent III

 Jewish authorities are well aware of the two phases in the teachings of Luther: the phase during which he wrote his drooling "Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew," filled with sympathy for their long unbelief, which Luther laid tot he unsympathetic attitude of the Catholic Popes and hierarchy. Luther's study of the Talmud became the dividing line. His second and last phase was one of warning against the Jews as destroyers of Christianity and Christians. He preceded the world events created by the Red Beast regimes of Talmudists by more than 350 years. He reached an opinion in perfect unison with Pope Innocent III and the Popes of the centuries following him.

 Pope Innocent III in a long decree stated that: Jews are "not to be killed by anyone," but "they are to us dangerous as the insect in the apple, as the serpent in the breast...Since, therefore, they have already begun to gnaw like the rat, and to stink like the serpent, it is to our shame that the fire in our breast which is being eaten by them, does not consume them...Although Christian piety tolerates the Jews ...and allows them to continue with us, although the Moors will not tolerate them, they must not be allowed to remain ungrateful to us in such a way as to repay us with contumely for favors, and contempt for our familiarity. They are admitted to our familiarity only through our mercy..."

 Under the same Pope, canons 67-70 were adopted by the Fourth Latheran Council which include protective measures against Jewish usury, their wearing of a distinguishing badge (to warn Christians against their mental leprosy); forbidding intercourse with Christians, as employees, in marriage, etc.; and barring their testimony as witnesses in legal matters (their Kol Nidre license for perjury then being well known) etc.

 It is more than a little strange that the Bulls of the Popes over the many centuries, warning against the Jews, should be seemingly unknown to the Catholic clergy today, and that the writings of Luther on the same subject, which are like almost a second gospel to Protestants of the Lutheran fold, should be equally unknown today!

 Luthe's Shem Hamphorash

 Where is Luther's reply to the Talmudic charge that Jesus did His miracles by magic with the Tetragammaton, or Shem Hamphorash, the constants of the word Jehovah (by which the Rabbis whistle up the demons)? He published it in 1543 and wrote: "Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain...that the Jews, as they are today, are veritable a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over...to afflict the different nations with their usury, to spy upon others, and to betray, to poison wells, to deceive and to kidnap children, in short, to practice all kinds of dishonesty and injury."

 The Arab Charge

 In the above underlined charge of Luther, we see modern substantiation in the report of the "Arab Higher Committee for Palestine, 4512 Empire State Building, N.Y., N.Y., presented to the United Nations on July 20, 1948. In the printed brochure, among such subtitles as the following, are details on well-poisoning: "Massacres, Indiscriminate Killing and Savage Acts; Maltreatment and Humiliation of Prisoners; Indecent Acts Against Women and Girls; Looting of Property; Destruction of Holy Places" (14 churches being shelled, used as arsenals, etc.) and later evidence showing the typical Talmudic acts, told by a Christian priest, of intercourse on altars, defiling same with excreta, etc.

 Under the heading: "Jews Resort to Bacteriological Warfare," is data concerning the outbreak of cholera in Egypt and Syria, "with some, but not conclusive evidence that Zionists were responsible," but positive evidence of their bacteriological laboratories in Palestine for such ends. The NBC reporter Leon Peason, in Paris, is quoted as reporting on January 12, 1948 that "the Jewish underground is preparing to launch bacteriological warfare against the Arabs," followed by official Egyptian evidence that the Gaza water supply of the Egyptians was poisoned by typhoid and dysentery germs by Jews who had confessed the job. (p. 14) And there is more. One an assert positively that Talmudic doctrine sanctions and sanctifies such acts against "Goyim," cattle.

 Luther in his brochure, "The Jews and Their Lies" reveals his perception of the close affinity (and substance) of Talmudic Judaism with paganism; and his disdain for Talmudic idiocies is expressed in language only second in strength to that of Christ Himself.

 Plato and Judaism

 Plato and Aristotle are Talmudic idols. Republic uses a false religion to keep the slaves in subjection, but his real god is the sum of nature, presided over by the Intelligences, spirits, like old Aristotle's ten boss Intelligences of the plane's (now called the Ten Sephirot of the Talmudists' Cabala). God is a self-perking insensate agglomeration of spirit or matter; take your choice, as Marx did. Marx chose matter as eternal and spirit as an attribute of it; Plato took the "idea" as reality, like Christian Science and the Cabala, with "error" or sin, as unreal. "Evil according to the Cabalistic philosophy, is non-existent, anticipating Christian Science..." ("Cabala," Universal Jewish Encyclopedia) Hence we read in the same source of "the considerable number of Jews (who) have been attracted to this faith," and "have held that they did not necessarily desert Judaism by so dong" There is no gain in switching says the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, and the glorification of Jesus is the one repugnant feature warned against as non-Jewish ("Christian Science").

 As the Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 477, states under "Cabala.": "As the divine (small ‘d' in original, for it mans the pantheistic sum of nature) has true being, evil is that which has no being, the seeming thing, the thing as it appears." Andone Asserts, declares one's own divinity; one does not Ask, either in Cabalism or so-called"Christian" "Science." Aristotle's bastard son, and the dressed up "heterai," or prostitutes, who popularized the pagan philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, and the entire peripatetic of school of Athens, are examples of immoral conduct mirrored in the Talmud, but not in the Person of the man of Galilee. Carefully buried are the old historical accounts cited by the French historian Lacroix (1806-1884) (English translation by Samuel Putnam, 1931, Coviei Friede, N.Y.) in his "History of Prostitution."Aspasia, the heterai whom Pericles married and continued to share with Socrates and Alcibiades, carries on a revolting dialogue with Sacrates and advises him how he can secure Alciblades as his subject for sodomy. Plato's obscene poems; his mistress Archaenesse to whose wrinkles he wrote an ode the degradation of little children, outnumbering adults in paying the prostitute tax to the city of Rome as lesbians and sodomites, trained in that vice by their parents at the time of Christ; the sodomy of Horace and all his foul poems, makes one realize the position of the Light of the World in a sewer of Talmudic paganism. The Talmudic rule of little children today is the same as in Christ's name; subjects for vice, in direct opposition to that decreed by Christ.
 

Judaism - Talmud - Part 35

 Luther on Plato

 The Jewish Encyclopedia, ("Gentiles"): "Judah ben Ilai recommends that the daily recital of the benediction,'Blessed be thou ...who hast not made me a goy.'" this also has: "who hast not made me a woman," and also "who hast made me an Israelite...who hast not made me a slave." this is a "benediction" prescribed by the Talmud and listed under "Benedictions" in the Jewish Encyclopedia.

 Luther in his "The Jews and Their Lies"wrote:"they exalt themselves and praise God for separating them from the heathen...In order that their raving, frantic and foolish nonsense might be perfect, they praise and thank God, first, that they are human beings and not animals; secondly, that they are Israelites and not Goyim (heathen); thirdly, that they were created as Men and not as Women. Such foolishness they do not have from Israel, but from Goyim.

 "For thus the historians write that the Greek Plato daily gave such praise and thanks to God, if such blasphemy and haughtiness could be called the praise of God. For that man (Plato) also praised his gods for these three things, that he was a man and not an animal, a man and not a woman, a Greek and not a non-Greek or barbarian. Such is the praying of a fool and the praise of a blasphemous barbarian; just as the Mals imagine that they alone are human beings and all the rest of the world nothing but inhuman beings, ducks, or mice."

 Luther Cites Christ - Esther

 Luther quotes John 8:39, 44, wherein Crist told the Pharisees: "Ye are of your father the Devil," and warns Christians to "be on their guard against these hardened condemned people; who accuse God of lying and proudly despise the whole world...They are boastful, proud fools..." He goes on to call them "Liars and Bloodhounds." The book of Esther, which Catholic and Protestant theologians in all centuries have protested as being unhistorical, irreligious (the name of God does not once appear in it) and out of place in the Bible, Luther then cites, The Jewish Publication Society book on "Purim Anthology" (Philip Goodman, 1949) and points out the inconsistency of Persian-run nobles giving permission to Jews to slaughter Persians and calls attention to Purim having been a souse and gift festival of Babylonians celebrating the triumph of the Babylonian sex-gods Bel Marduk (Mordecai) and Ishtar or Astarte (Esther) over the rival sex-goddess Mashti (Vashti). In the Persian city of Susa the colony of Babylonians had celebrated this festiva, which, we are told, was refurbished at the time of the Maccabees (168 B.C.) To put flight into their crowd. The victory of Judah the Maccabee over the Syrian general Nicanor was celebrated and the day declared a holiday, the 13th of Adar, 161 B.C. There is no mention of Purim in the New Testament, no certainty that a king Ahasuerus mentioned in the book of Esther ever existed. How about a Godly heroine bearing a pagan sex-goddess' name? Luther wrote: "they are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end without ceasing with their interpretations...O, how they love that book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their revengeful people; they who imagine themselves to be the people of God, who desire to think they must murder and crush the heathen...As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do so now, if only they could..." Here, Luther anticipated the carnage of millions of Christians under the Talmudic Communist countries of today.

 Jews Worse Than The Heathen

 Luther reflects that passage in 2 Peter 2 about those who "speak great swelling words of vanity," promise liberty, but "they themselves are the servants of corruption...For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they had known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them...according to the true proverb, he dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to its wallowing in the mire."

 Luther wrote: "How much better it would be if they did not have God's Commandment or did not know it. For if they did not have it, they would be uncondemned. They are condemned because they have God's Commandment and do not keep it, but act against it without ceasing...In like manner murderers and whores, thieves and scoundrels and all evil men could boast they are God's holy and chosen people, because they have His Word and know that they should fear and obey him..."

 Luther then knew the Talmud, and continues: "The heathen philosophers write much more honorably...They write that man by nature is obligated to serve others, also to keep his word to his enemies...Yea, I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of the Talmudists and Rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews. Should someone think I am saying too much; I am not saying too much, but much too little! For I see in their writings how they curse us Goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury...they play us all manner of mean tricks; what is worst of all, they...teach that such should be done. No Heathen has done such things and none would do so except the Devil himself, and those whom he possesses like he possesses the Jews."

 Number Tricks

 Luther goes into a dissertation showing he was familiar with the letter and number tricks, by which adding the numerical value of a word is used to create a new Talmudic meaning for Scriptural verses; devilish ones. Luther goes into the perversion of the name of Jesus. Christ foretold the numerical number of the anti-Christ's name as 666, according to Pharisee custom now, as then (See under "Gematria, Notaricon, Temura in Jewish authorities). Much of the "wisdom of the sages" depends on these number-letter tricks, which are utterly cheap shyster stunts.

 Calling Mary A Whore

 Luther continues with the Talmud: "Thus they call Him (Jesus) the child of a whore and His mother, Mary, a whore, whom she had in adultery...Reluctantly I must speak so coarsely in opposing the Devil...We do not call our wives whores as they call Maria, the Mother of Jesus; we do not call them bastards, as they call our Lord Christ. We do not curse them, bu wish them all manner of bodily and spiritual good; permit them to lodge with us. We don't steal and mutilate their children; do not poison their water; do not thirst after their blood...

 Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about being captives among us. Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1400 years ago and during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by Jews in all the world. For nearly 300 years we might well complain that during that time they captured and killed the Christians, which is the clear truth. On poof that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem. On top of that no one is holding them now. Land and highways are open to them...they are a heavy burden to us in our country, like a plague, pestilence, and nothing but misfortune...Should the Devil not laugh and dance, when in this manner he can have his paradise among us Christians...and to think us...blasphemes and curses God and man!...Now what are we going to do with these rejected condemned Jewish people?"
 

Judaism - Talmud - Part 36

 Luther's Conclusions

 After Luther became conversant with the Talmud and the ritual cursings of so-called "Judaism," his advice exactly matched that of the ever-reenforced edicts of the beleaguered Popes. A person who condones such blasphemies, he said, partakes of them.

 He said they should be forced to leave the country (and so they were from one country after another, but were always allowed back in when a new greedy king came to the throne: Expulsions of Jews from Host Nations: 1). A.D. 250, Carthage; 2). 415, Alexandria; 3). 554, Diocese of Clement (France); 4). 561, Diocese of Uzzes (France); 5). 612, Visigoth Spain; 6). 642, Visigoth Empire; 7). 855, Italy; 8). 876, Sens; 9). 1012, Mayence; 10). 1181, France; 11). 1290, England; 12). 1306, France; 13). 1348, Switzerland; 14). 1349, Hielbronn (Germany); 15). 1349, Hungary; 16). 1388, Strasbourg; 17). 1394, Germany; 18). 1394, France; 19). 1422, Austria; 20). 1424, Fribourg & Zurich; 21). 1426, Cologne; 22). 1432, Savory; 23). 1438, Mainz; 24). 1439, Augsburg; 25). 1446, Bavaria; 26). 1453, Franconis; 27). 1453, Breslau; 28). 1454, Wurzburg; 29). 1485, Vincenza (Italy); 30). 1492, Spain; 31). 1495, Lithuania; 32). 1497, Portugal; 33). 1499, Germany; 34). 1514, Strasbourg; 35). 1519, Regensburg; 36). 1540, Naples; 37). 1542, Bohemia; 38). 1550, Genoa; 39). 1551, Bavaria; 40). 1555, Pesaro; 41). 1559, Austria; 42). 1561, Prague; 43). 1567, Wurzburg, Genoese Republic; 44). 1569, Papal States; 45). 1571, Brandenburg; 46). 1582, Netherlands; 47). 1593, Brandenburg, Austria; 48). 1597, Cremona, Pavia & Lodi; 49). 1614, Frankfort; 50). 1615, Worms; 51). 1619, Kiev; 52). 1649, Ukraine; 53). 1654, LittleRussia; 54). 1656, Lithuania; 55). 1669, Oran (North Africa); 56). 1670, Vienna; 57). 1712, Sandomir; 58). 1727, Russia; 59). 1738, Wurtemburg; 60). 1740, LittleRussia; 61). 1744, Bohemia; 62). 1744, Livonia; 63). 1745, Moravia; 64). 1753, Kovad (Lithuania); 65). 1761, Bordeaux; 66). 1772, Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia); 67). 1775, Warsaw; 68). 1789, Alace; 69). 1804, Villages in Russia; 70). 1808, Villages & Countrysides (Russia); 71). 1815, Lubeck & Bremen; 72). 1815, Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria; 73). 1820, Bremes; 74). 1843, Russian Border Austria & Prussia; 75). 1862, Area in the U.S. under Grant's Jurisdiction; 76). 1866, Galatz, Romania; 77). 1919, Bavaria (foreign born Jews); 78). 1938-45, Nazi Controlled Areas; 79). 1948, Arab Countries. (International Jewish Encyclopedia).

 The degrading fate of those who mock the wise becomes horribly apparent in the actual text of the Talmud.  "He said: What is your punishment? They replied with boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever mocks at the words of the Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement." (Git. 56b)

 Thrown Out: Jews have claimed over and over at every opportunity that they have been innocent victims of anti-Semitism time and time again. They are always portrayed on television and in the movies as being guilty of no wrong doing, desiring only to practice their faith, and make an honest living. An inquiring mind cannot help but wonder that, if this is the case - that the Jews are innocent - why have the Jews been the brunt of persecution so many times without cause?

 If a man were accused of a serious crime and tried and found guilty by a jury of his peers, we would find but little cause to put faith in a claim by him of persecution. However if he insisted that this was exactly the case, and that only because he believed differently than others was he charged of misconduct, then we might grant him a second trial to assure ourselves he had not been the victim of misjustice, believing with confidence that the people would not a second time find an innocent party guilty of crime that he did not commit.

 If, at the conclusion of the second trial by another jury of peers, the man is found guilty of an offense against the people, we have no reason to listen to or place belief in continued cries of persecution. What does this have to do with the Jew? Quite simple. Since the year 250 A.D., the Jews have, by their own records and count, been expelled from eighty-one (81) countries, nations, or political entities. Let's see now. Eighty-one countries, eighty-one people's courts, eighty-one guilty verdicts, and eighty-one cries of persecution.

 The first time, maybe. The second time doubtful. But eighty-one times to have been found worthy of expulsion for crimes against the people of the countries they were in at the time? Such a claim stretches the limits of human credulity beyond its most liberal bounds of endurance.

 It has been said that the Jews protest to much. When one comes to the realization of the fact that these different peoples in most cases did not know of each other, or for that matter had not even heard of the others existence, and yet determined, independently, over a two thousand year span of time that the Jews were committing such serious crimes that it was necessary to uproot them lock, stock and barrel in order to drive them from their homes, many times with loss of life and great destruction of property, it is then and only then, that a true appreciation of the Jewish question is obtained).

 We should not suffer it, after they are among us and we know about such lying, (Note: As authorized by the Kol Nidre, etc.) "blaspheming and cursing among them, lest we become partakers of their lies cursing, and blaspheming...We are not permitted to take revenge. Revenge is around their necks a thousand times greater than we could wish them. I will give you my true counsel:

 First: That we avoid their synagogues and schools and warn people against them...that God may see that we are Christians and have not knowingly tolerated such lying, cursing and blaspheming of His Son and His Christians. For what we have so far tolerated in ignorance (I myself did not know it), God will forgive us...Moses writes in Deuteronomy that where a city practiced idolatry, it should be entirely destroyed with fire and nothing left. If he were living today he would be the first to put fire to the Jewish schools and houses (which follows with Scriptural support).

 Secondly: That all of their books be taken away, prayer books, Talmuds, and not one page of it be left...For they use all that only to blaspheme the Son of God; that is God Himself...and will never use it any other way."

 Spiritually, Luther connects the Jews with those who betrayed Moses: "Of such are the remaining dregs of the jews, of whom Moses knows nothing: they also know nothing of him, for they do not keep one passage in Moses." This reminds one of the constantly reoccurring charge of Christ that the Pharisees violated and nullified the laws of Moses, such as: "The Scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat." (Matthew 23:2) In other words, they occupy His throne giving forth as Mosaic Law, their own foul permissions which they attribute to "Oral" laws Moses handed down to their own crowd unknown to the rest of the world, a think lie recognized as such by the Rabbis.

 Without any Jewish Encyclopedias or Soncino translations of the Babylonian Talmud, one sees that Luther understood perfectly the way the Talmud blasphemes and hangs obscene charges on Christ through double talk and words. (The Balaam passages are an example of this, but Luther names others). Luther recognized that any Messiah expected by the Jewry was only to lead them in slaughter to power.

 "The Jews desire no more from their Messiah than hat he should be a Kochba (leader of the Pharisee revolt against Rome in 135 A.D., in which about a million non-Jews were sadistically slaughtered, details being cited by historian Gibbon, from ancient historical sources) and a worldly king, who would slay the Christians, divide the world among the Jews and make them rich lords..."

 It is clear that Luther knew the Marranos, the Spanish word meaning "swine," of which Talmudists are so proud, because it designated the some 300,000 Talmudists who deliberately invaded the Catholic Church of Spain in order to accomplish what they did accomplish, and this they call the "Golden Age" of Jewry, which was the complete take-over of church and state, financial, educational, and ecclesiastic, to the helpless wrath of the subject Spanish Christians. Only the Inquisition directed against Talmudic tumors within the Church saved Christianity form extinction; as Talmudists so well know today. Read Cecil Roth's "Marrano" Jewish Publication Society of America)

horizontal rule

"Political freedom is an idea but not a fact..." (Protocol 1:6)
Click Here if you would like a hard copy of any of Willie Martin's books

Jew Watch - Willie Martin

horizontal rule