Judaism - Talmud - Part
See the Bible versus Oral Law; it is always superior to the Bible.
(Sanhedrin 59a) What makes the Talmudists "God's Chosen People" is only
the Pharisees "Oral Law," or Babylonian Talmud, they say.
The Bible, through Moses, teaches that anyone who strikes or curses
his parents is worthy of death. But the Pharisee "Sages" have improved
upon that. One may strike parents to the point of wounding them, while
they are alive, but the sky is the limit after they are dead. Ah! What
a privilege to follow the Oral Law or Talmud!
Nor is that all that the "Chosen People" are sanctioned in doing.
They may curse their parents providing they use any term meaning God except
the Y-H-W-H consonants of the word Jehovah, the Tetragammaton, which is
reserved for the Big Shots to use in whistling up demons. The word "God"
is not supposed to be written or spoken today, and the California Jewish
Voice carried an article in which the word is spelled "G-D" throughout.
Not piety but sheer superstition governs this. And one of Christ's major
"crimes" was that He pronounced the Name as spelled (Sanhedrin 55b-56a)
from the "chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud" Sanhedrin.
In this, it is explained that "Bless" is used instead of "Curse," in Talmudic
double-talk style. This style has been necessary until the Jews could get
an Iron Curtain power in their hands, to conceal a wholly criminal religion
which is a blasphemy and conspiracy against the rest of the entire human
race, but Christianity and its follower!
Moses said that anyone who cursed or struck mother or father should
be put to death (Exodus 21:15, 17 Leviticus 20:9; Deuteronomy 27:16). One
must honor parents.
Christ on Parents
Sanhedrin 66a; 85b: Christ knew Pharisee doctrine. He knew the
Pharisee custom of drizzling water alternately on the hand to chase off
the demons on arising, and before eating, for demons supposedly live in
water and go for it. It is the push broom which dislodges and refunnels
them. Tashlik is the current and ancient Pharisee custom of dropping crumbs
into a river or body of water at Rosh Hashona, or flapping the garments
at them, as the Hasidim do, to appease them. Brooklyn and Manhattan bridges
in New York are much used for this today, says the Jewish Encyclopedia
of 1905, ("Tashlik")
"Yad" is hand and "Yadayim," the plural, hands. The Talmud book
of Yadayim is devoted to the hand washing in connection with the demonology
of Pharisaism to which Christ objected. So, when the Pharisees came baiting
Him about His Apostles not doing the hand washing act (Matthew 15:2; Mark
7:3) act, He came back at them, saying that they were hypocrites, "teaching
for doctrines the commandments of men...Full well ye reject the commandment
of God that ye may keep your own tradition.
"For Moses said, Honour father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth
father or mother, let him die the death; "But ye say, if a man shall say
to his father or mother, It is Corhan, that is to say a gift (Or I have
dedicated to God that which would relieve your need)...ye suffer him no
more to do ought for his father or his mother: making the word of God of
none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered, and many such
like things ye do." (Mark 7:1-13) Matthew 15 contains the same denunciation
and same quotation from Isaiah, calling them hypocrites, etc.
Christ was hated by the pagan Pharisees for such teachings as:
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not
come to destroy, but to fulfill...Whosoever therefore shall break one of
the least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the
least in the kingdom of heaven...except your righteousness shall exceed
the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter
into the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 5:17-20)
There is nothing now, as formerly, in Talmudic doctrine, against
polygamy. It is practiced by Jews in countries where it is allowed. It
was Rabbi Gershom Ben Judah (born Metz, 960; died Mayence, France, 1040
A.D.) whose edicts were accepted by European Jewry as final for all time,
who commanded Jews in Christian countries to stop getting into trouble
with the law by polygamy. Israel first proposed extra allowances for plural
wives but now seems to be screening polygamy from Christian eyes.
After the period of the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob,
and before this, in the case of Adam, and Noah, Monogamy ruled. The Prophets
were Monogamists, Moses commanded regarding a man of God that: "That neither
shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away..." (Deuteronomy
17:17) And, admittedly, the polygamy of David and his son Solomon ended
the Israel thirteen tribe united kingdom. Their hordes of pagan wives with
foul altars broke down any Gody spirit which had formerly united them.
The Pharisee "Sages" embrolder upon the above words of Moses against polygamy,
their permission to have 18, 24 or 48 wives. (Sanhedrin 20b-21a)
The Mishna asks: "Why then is it written neither shall he multiply
wives to himself...Rabbi Simeon said: He must not marry even one who may
turn away his heart; (5) From which it might be inferred that he may marry
a lesser number even if they should corrupt him."
The 1952 book by "Salo Wittmayer Baron, Professor of Jewish History,
Literature, and Institutions on the Miller Foundation, Columbia University"
(Known as "Columbia the Germ of the Nation"), is entitled: "A Social and
Religious History of the Jews" and is published by the American Jewish
Committee's Jewish Publication Society of America. The chapter, "The World
of the Talmud," cites the harem of King Solomon (which finished him morally
and otherwise) saying its "memory kindled the imagination of polygamous
Jews in subsequent ages." Although, we are told, there was no real difference
between Palestinian and Babylonian Jewries fundamentally, "there are indications
that Babylonian Jewish society had more polygamous features than did that
"Anecdotes like those current in regard to Rab and Rabbi Nahman
(who) after arriving in a foreign city they used to advertise for women
ready to marry them for the time of their sojourn (man havya le-yoma')...In
law, too, the Babylonian emphasis lay upon the Jew's right to marry as
many wives as he is able to support'...Perhaps egged on by the growing
Christians propaganda against divorce, the Hillelite school stressed the
husband's freedom to divorce his wife even for some culinary deficiency,
or, as Rabbi Anquiba (Akiba) taught, because he had found a better looking
woman." And, if you doubt that the above Rabbis are "saints" of the "synagogue
of Satan," as Christ: put it, then read up on them in the Jewish Encyclopedias.
Under "Talmudic Eugenics," is this on incest: "In Egypt the Ptolemaic
rulers themselves, for the most part, married their own sisters. In Parthia
Persia, marriages between parents and children were valid, and those among
brothers and sisters were quite customary. The Parsee religion...encouraged
such marriages as the fittest mens of preserving family purity (Yasna'
12, 9)...Artaxerxes II had married his two daughters, and...Mithraidates
I had married his mother. Ardea Viraz is said to have married his seven
sister." (Talmudic Eugenics, Vol. II, p. 229)
Judaism - Talmud - Part 32
"On one point, particularly, Roman law differed from Jewish; marriages
between an uncle and a niece...We recall that both Rabbi Eliezer and Abba
married nieces, as did Rabbi Jose the Galilean... Rabbi Idumael made a
special effort to overrule his vow (not to marry his own niece) and to
make the niece more attractive to him by improving her teeth..." (Talmudic
Eugenics, Vol. II, p. 230) That both business shows his nobility?
Although Moses commanded, in God's name, that a woman should not
marry her uncle, or a man his aunt (Leviticus 18:14), these "People of
the Book" today are fighting to modify American state laws against such
marriages, and have been successful in some states, on the ground that
their "religion" requires such latitude. And the dumb Judeo-Christian (sic)
parrot the lie that "Judaism" is founded on Mosaic law, the Old Testament!
The History of the Jewish Talmud, Introduction p. 2; pp. 66, 68:
Rodkinson (M. Levi Frumkin) in the first English translation of the Babylonian
Talmud, edited by the father of "Reform" Rabbis, Isaac M. Wise, which includes
a "History of the Talmud," puts his finger on the real cause of trouble
between the czarist governments of Russia and the Talmudic Jews. This work
was put out in 190, which was before the 1904 Kuhn-Leob-financed Japanese-Russian
war culminated in the bloody Talmudic Communist Revolution of 1905 in Russia.
At the celebration of the 1917 final triumph of Jewry, at Carnegie Hal
in N.Y. (N.Y. Times 3/24/1917), it was proudly told how Jacob Schiff had
financed Communist propaganda spread among 50,000 Russian war prisoners
in Jew-financed Japan, which sent them back to put over the 1905 Communist
Revolution in their Russian homeland. But Rodkinson tells what was wrong.
Writing of the battles of the Talmud, and its followers, authored
by the Pharisees (History of the Talmud, Chapter One), we read that following
the Sadducees, Samaritans, the followers of Jesus and the early Roman (pagan)
emperors. (History of the Talmud, Introduction): "The Rabbis next encountered
the Popes. From the time of Pope Innocent III, the Talmud was burned at
the stake in nearly every century from the 11th to the 18th in Italy, France,
Germany, Spain, and many other countries..." He speaks of the disputations
which the Popes and kings held in which the accusers of that Talmud were
answered by its defenders. The results were always that, the criminality
of the Talmud being revealed in all its horror, the Talmud was ordered
burned, expunged or censored, until the same thing started over again.
Rodkinson continues: "Still today, and not one letter in it is missing."
Rodkinson "Spills the Beans"
Then:: "It is true that persecutions against it are not yet at
an end; accusations and calumnies by its enemies, under the new name of
anti-Semites, are still directed against it, while the government of Russia
legislates against and restricts the rights of the NATION WHICH ADHERES
TO THE TALMUD." (The History of the Talmud, Introduction) But, Rodkinson
expects the sub-sewer Talmud to reign eternally "as long as the sky spans
the earth." (He reckons without God)
A partial chart of the burning of the Talmud at the hands of the
Kings and Popes appears in The Talmud At The Stake, p. 117-118.
The Popes in the Jewish
Jewish Encyclopedia gave credit to the Popes for stopping violence
against them for seeking to convert them, and securing certain rights for
them in territories over which they exercised temporal power. Although
the Bishops were issuing restrictive laws against Jewish aggressions long
before this, the reign of Gregory the Great (590-604 A.D.) is taken as
the starting point of consistent relations between the Jews and the People.
He condemned the holding of Christian slaves by Jews.
Pope Leo VII: Wrote the Archbishop of Mayence a reply telling
him he might offer his Jews the choice between conversion or emigrating.
Anacleus II (antipope): Was a Jew and his claim to the papacy
has always been contested.
Benedictus VIII: Had a number of Jews put to death for blasphemy
Gregory VII: Charged the German emperor, Henry IV, with favoritism
towards the Jew, and "in 1078 A.D., he renewed the canonical laws which
prohibited giving Jews power over Christians...Jews might not be employed
as tax-farmers or mint-masters.
Popes Calixtus II (1119-1124 A.D.) and Pope Alexander III: Are
cited for pro-Jewish acts.
Innocent III: Is the most hated of the Popes, in Jewish literature.
In 1215 A.D., the Fourth Lateral Council which he convened "renewed the
old canonical prohibitions against trusting the Jews with public offices
and introduced the law demanding that Jews should wear a distinctive sign
on their garments (a yellow badge; this is where the tradition of tying
yellow ribbons on trees and etc., which is prevalent in this country today
came from)...Nevertheless he protected them against the fury of the French
Crusaders." Under "Badge" is more on this.
Gregory IX: "in various official documents insisted on the strict
execution of the canonical laws against the Jews...his successor," to continue
Innocent IV: "Ordered the burning of the Talmud in Paris." (1244
Through Emperor Sigismund: "who was heavily indebted to them,
they (the Jews) obtained from Pope Martin V (1417-1431 A.D.) ...various
bulls (1418 and 1422 A.D.; favorable to them). "In the last years of his
pontificate, however, he repeated several of his ordinances, charging that
they had been obtained under false pretenses."
Eugene IV and Nicholas V: Are cited for moderation.
Sixtus IV: Sanctioned the Spanish Inquisition, which was aimed
at the 300,000 Jews who had entered the Church, retained their Talmudism,
and secured power over all phases of Spanish life. (See "The Marrano's,"
by Cecil Roth, Jewish Publication Society of America)
Alexander VI (Borgia): Known in history as the most profligate
of the popes, was rather favorably inclined toward the Jews."
Leo X: One of the Medicis who fanned the Reformation by sponsoring
the great renaissance of paganism and filled the Platonic Academy and salons
of Rome and Florence with Jews, expounding Talmud, and occult Cabala, is
called "the humanist...favorably inclined toward the Jews, whom he employed
not only as physicians, but also as artists and in other positions at his
court. The beginning of the Reformation influenced his action in the controversy
between Reuchlin and Pfefferkorn (the capitalization indicating that these
subjects are covered elsewhere in the Jewish Encyclopedia) which he settled
in such a way as not to give any encouragement to those who demanded reforms
in the Church." True enough. The story of the sincerely converted Jew,
Pfefferkorn, who aired the infamies of the Talmud truly, opposed by the
Catholic renegade, dupe of the head of the Jewish community of Rome, Reuchlin,
and the pro-Jewish Medici Pope, ended with Pfefferkorn being silenced,
Reuchlin not tried for heresy, as he was scheduled to be and should have
been, and two hostile camps in every German town taking sides for or against
Judaism - Talmud - Part 33
How Martin Luther entered this picture, first as a daring of the
Jews, when he wrote the drooling "Jesus Christ Was Born A Jew" in which
he blamed the Catholic hierarchy for being responsible for Jews not having
been converted; they called Jews nasty names, and asserting that he, Luther
welcomed them to his heart, is a picture unpainted by Catholic or Protestant
sources. We are never told how he found that Jews who had encouraged him
to break with the Church were Judaizing his followers. He then read the
Talmud introduced to him by a really converted Jew. Then he wrote "The
Jews and their Lies" and such terrible philippics that they make the utterances
of the Popes almost pale by comparison after he became wised up to the
Today the Bulls of the Popes are buried alongside of those of
Clement VII (another Jew)was the bastard son of Guilio, brother
of Lorenzo the Magnificent, founder of the pagan salon, the Platonic Academy.
How The Medicis Gained
Lorenzo the Magnificent, politician and lord of his Platonic Academy
which attempted the old Talmudic strategy of harmonizing pagan philosophy
with Christianity, as Maimonides had done with Biblical Judaism and Aristotle,
had his son Giovanni (Leo X) made a cardinal, through his influence with
Innocent VIII, at 1, having been made an archbishop at 7. Ready to pop
on the throne, Giovanni promptly made five of his relatives cardinals,
including his bastard cousin, Ginlio. Leo X (Giovanni), made Pope on March
11, 1513, was ordained a priest on the 15th and made a bishop on the 19th
of the same month, and he reigned until December 1,1521, nine years.
It was Leo X who launched the selling of indulgences in 1517 A.D.,
which was the immediate forerunner of Luther's break with the Church, and
of Europe's arousal. Every effort was made to corrupt and Talmudize the
church from the inside, whole Jewry worked to wreck it from the outside.
The hotheads among Jews, say Cecil Roth, the Jewish historian expected
to end Christianity and supplant it with Talmudism, but when Luther nailed
the theses on the Wittenberg Cathedral door, he nailed the Jews back in
the ghetto, and Popes eager for Christian faith in the ghetto, and Popes
eager for Christian faith and morals were elected in place of the pro-Talmudic
"humanist" Medici popes. Luther, in turn, found the same forces polluting
his own following and ended his life beseeching the Protestant prices to
expel or put at hard labor al Talmudists, after burning synagogues and
Talmuds first of all. Read his words if you can find them in any library.
There is only praise for the Medici Popes in Jewish literature
and only disappointment about the condition of Jewry during the Reformation
and afterwards, for the succeeding Popes drove the Talmudists out of Vatican
circles and back into the ghetto until some time about 1880.
Bewailing this, the Jewish Encyclopedia, reports how the Talmud
was burned by Pope Julius III in 1553 A.D., and Christians prohibited from
printing it. "The worst was yet to come," Paul IV (1555-1559 A.D.) in his
bull "Cum Nimis Absurdum" not only renewed all the canonical restrictions
on Jews, but restricted their commercial activities and made them wear
yellow hat and made them live in their own territory; the ghetto.
Pope Pius IV: Gave "a brief period of respite" (1566-1572 A.D.)
then his successor Pius V (1566-1572 A.D.) "not only repealed all the concessions
of his predecessor, and not only renewed the laws of Paul IV, but added
some new restrictions..." In 1569 A.D., he expelled the Jews from his territory.
Gregory XIII (1572-1585): Allowed the Jews to return but "introduced
a large number of severe restrictions...and they were obliged to send every
week at least 150 or their number" to listen to conversionist sermons (dreadful
Sixtus V (1585-1590): was more favorable to the Jews," and permitted
the printing of the Talmud after it was censored (1586).
Clement VIII (1592-1604): Ordered the Jews expelled and prohibited
printing of the Talmud.
Under Clement X (1670-1676): The Portugal Inquisition (against
Jewry) was halted but he refused to help the expelled Jews of Vienna (1670).
"The worst feature...under papal dominion was the closing of the gates
of the Roman ghetto nights. Severe penalties awaited a Jew leaving the
ghetto after dark, or a Christian entering it."
Pius VI (1775-1800): "renewed all the restrictions enacted from
the 13th century. The censorship of books was strictly enforced...and their
attendance at conversionist sermons was enforced."
Leo XII (1826): Reinforced these rules with extreme rigor.
Pius IX (1846-1878): Started in soft but, as stated in other Jewish
literature, after he had been expelled from Rome at the hands of a Jewish
movement which showed its Talmudic anti-Christian face with savagery, he
changed his mind. To Quote: "Pius IX During the first two years of his
pontificate, was evidently inclined to adopt a liberal attitude, but after
his return from exile he...condemned as abominable laws all measures which
gave political freedom to them...showed his approval of the medieval laws
as enacted by Innocent III. He maintained the ghetto in Rome until it was
abolished by the Italian occupation of Rome (1870)." (Jewish Encyclopedia,
Leo XII (1878-1903): Was the first pope who exercised no territorial
jurisdiction over the Jews. His influence, nevertheless, was prejudicial
to them. He encouraged anti-Semitism by bestowing distinctions on leading
anti-Semitic politicians and authors, as Lueger and Drumont (Eduard Drumont's
book, LaFrance Juive' traces the Talmudization of French Christian life
in every phase. A Judaized France was the result he deplored) he refused
to interfere in behalf of Captain Dreyfus, or to issue a statement against
the blood accusation (That human blood is used in Talmudic black magic
rituals, and in during their Purim Celebrations). "In an official document
he denounced JEWS, freemasons, and anarchists as the enemies of the Church."
Pius X (elected 1903): Is not sufficiently known (This is in the
1905 Jewish Encyclopedia) to permit a judgment...but in his diocese of
Mantua, before he became pope, he had prohibited the celebration of a solemn
mass on the king's birthday because the city council which asked for it
had attended a celebration in the synagogue."
19th and 20th Century Popes
In 553 A.D., Emperor Justinian forbad the spread of the Talmudic
books through out the Roman Empire (Corp. Juris can.VII Decretal, lib.
V, Tit. IV, cap. 1) Popes Julius III, Paul IV, Plus V, Gregory XIII, Clement
VIII, Alexander VII, Benedict XIV, etc., who issued ne editions of the
Index of Forbidden Books, condemned them rigorously; in accord with the
orders of the Council of Trent, proscribed them.
The Index Expurgatorious issued by the above Leo XIII in 1887
stated concerning "The Talmud and other Jewish Books." "Although in the
Index issued by Pope Pius IV, the Jewish Talmud with all its glossaries,
annotations, interpretations and expositions were prohibited: but if published
without the name Talmud and without its vile calumnies against the Christian
religion they could be tolerated; however, Our Holy Lord Pope Clement VIII
in his Constitution against impious writings and Jewish books, published
in Rome in the year of Our Lord 1592...proscribed and condemned them: it
was not his intention thereby to permit or tolerate them even under the
above conditions; for he expressly and specifically stated and willed,
that the impious Talmudic, Cabalistic and other nefarious books of the
Jews be entirely condemned and that they must remain always condemned and
prohibited, and that his Constitution about these books must be perpetually
and inviolably observed."
Judaism - Talmud - Part 34
The Vatican's semi-official organ, "L'Osservatore Romano," of
August 13, 198, in an article headed "The Jews and the Vatican Council
(1870), after speaking of the Protective measures for the Jews of the Catholic
church, then goes on to say: "But; in order to set things straight, by
this it was not intended that Jews should be allowed to abuse the hospitality
of Christian countries. Along with these protective ordinances, there existed
restrictive and precautionary decrees with regard to them. The civil power
was in accord with the Church in this, since, as Delassus says, they both
had the same interest in preventing the nations from being invaded by the
Jewish element and thereby losing control of society.' But if Christians
were forbidden to force Jews to embrace the Catholic religion, to disturb
their synagogues, their Sabbaths and their festivals, the Jews, on the
other hand, were forbidden to hold public office, civil or military; and
this prohibition extended even tot he children of converted Jews. The precautionary
decrees concerned the professions, education, and business positions."
One who reads the Jewish press today and sees congratulations
to Israel from Spanish "Catholics" who identify themselves as Talmudic
Jews who have practiced their Talmudism secretly ever since 1492, when
their co-religionists were expelled from Spain, where 300,000 of them had
taken over the Church from the inside, can realize the necessity of the
precaution underlined above. The word "Convert" is so often false.
One must learn from Jewish authorities that Torquemada himself,
leading the Inquisition, was a Jew, and that the Inquisition was only aimed
at the Marranos who under the pretense of conversion threatened to end
Christianity by their inside job.
Luther and Pope Innocent
Jewish authorities are well aware of the two phases in the teachings
of Luther: the phase during which he wrote his drooling "Jesus Christ Was
Born a Jew," filled with sympathy for their long unbelief, which Luther
laid tot he unsympathetic attitude of the Catholic Popes and hierarchy.
Luther's study of the Talmud became the dividing line. His second and last
phase was one of warning against the Jews as destroyers of Christianity
and Christians. He preceded the world events created by the Red Beast regimes
of Talmudists by more than 350 years. He reached an opinion in perfect
unison with Pope Innocent III and the Popes of the centuries following
Pope Innocent III in a long decree stated that: Jews are "not
to be killed by anyone," but "they are to us dangerous as the insect in
the apple, as the serpent in the breast...Since, therefore, they have already
begun to gnaw like the rat, and to stink like the serpent, it is to our
shame that the fire in our breast which is being eaten by them, does not
consume them...Although Christian piety tolerates the Jews ...and allows
them to continue with us, although the Moors will not tolerate them, they
must not be allowed to remain ungrateful to us in such a way as to repay
us with contumely for favors, and contempt for our familiarity. They are
admitted to our familiarity only through our mercy..."
Under the same Pope, canons 67-70 were adopted by the Fourth Latheran
Council which include protective measures against Jewish usury, their wearing
of a distinguishing badge (to warn Christians against their mental leprosy);
forbidding intercourse with Christians, as employees, in marriage, etc.;
and barring their testimony as witnesses in legal matters (their Kol Nidre
license for perjury then being well known) etc.
It is more than a little strange that the Bulls of the Popes over
the many centuries, warning against the Jews, should be seemingly unknown
to the Catholic clergy today, and that the writings of Luther on the same
subject, which are like almost a second gospel to Protestants of the Lutheran
fold, should be equally unknown today!
Luthe's Shem Hamphorash
Where is Luther's reply to the Talmudic charge that Jesus did
His miracles by magic with the Tetragammaton, or Shem Hamphorash, the constants
of the word Jehovah (by which the Rabbis whistle up the demons)? He published
it in 1543 and wrote: "Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament,
I would maintain...that the Jews, as they are today, are veritable a mixture
of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over...to
afflict the different nations with their usury, to spy upon others, and
to betray, to poison wells, to deceive and to kidnap children, in short,
to practice all kinds of dishonesty and injury."
The Arab Charge
In the above underlined charge of Luther, we see modern substantiation
in the report of the "Arab Higher Committee for Palestine, 4512 Empire
State Building, N.Y., N.Y., presented to the United Nations on July 20,
1948. In the printed brochure, among such subtitles as the following, are
details on well-poisoning: "Massacres, Indiscriminate Killing and Savage
Acts; Maltreatment and Humiliation of Prisoners; Indecent Acts Against
Women and Girls; Looting of Property; Destruction of Holy Places" (14 churches
being shelled, used as arsenals, etc.) and later evidence showing the typical
Talmudic acts, told by a Christian priest, of intercourse on altars, defiling
same with excreta, etc.
Under the heading: "Jews Resort to Bacteriological Warfare," is
data concerning the outbreak of cholera in Egypt and Syria, "with some,
but not conclusive evidence that Zionists were responsible," but positive
evidence of their bacteriological laboratories in Palestine for such ends.
The NBC reporter Leon Peason, in Paris, is quoted as reporting on January
12, 1948 that "the Jewish underground is preparing to launch bacteriological
warfare against the Arabs," followed by official Egyptian evidence that
the Gaza water supply of the Egyptians was poisoned by typhoid and dysentery
germs by Jews who had confessed the job. (p. 14) And there is more. One
an assert positively that Talmudic doctrine sanctions and sanctifies such
acts against "Goyim," cattle.
Luther in his brochure, "The Jews and Their Lies" reveals his
perception of the close affinity (and substance) of Talmudic Judaism with
paganism; and his disdain for Talmudic idiocies is expressed in language
only second in strength to that of Christ Himself.
Plato and Judaism
Plato and Aristotle are Talmudic idols. Republic uses a false
religion to keep the slaves in subjection, but his real god is the sum
of nature, presided over by the Intelligences, spirits, like old Aristotle's
ten boss Intelligences of the plane's (now called the Ten Sephirot of the
Talmudists' Cabala). God is a self-perking insensate agglomeration of spirit
or matter; take your choice, as Marx did. Marx chose matter as eternal
and spirit as an attribute of it; Plato took the "idea" as reality, like
Christian Science and the Cabala, with "error" or sin, as unreal. "Evil
according to the Cabalistic philosophy, is non-existent, anticipating Christian
Science..." ("Cabala," Universal Jewish Encyclopedia) Hence we read in
the same source of "the considerable number of Jews (who) have been attracted
to this faith," and "have held that they did not necessarily desert Judaism
by so dong" There is no gain in switching says the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia,
and the glorification of Jesus is the one repugnant feature warned against
as non-Jewish ("Christian Science").
As the Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 477, states under "Cabala.": "As
the divine (small d' in original, for it mans the pantheistic sum of nature)
has true being, evil is that which has no being, the seeming thing, the
thing as it appears." Andone Asserts, declares one's own divinity; one
does not Ask, either in Cabalism or so-called"Christian" "Science." Aristotle's
bastard son, and the dressed up "heterai," or prostitutes, who popularized
the pagan philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, and the entire peripatetic
of school of Athens, are examples of immoral conduct mirrored in the Talmud,
but not in the Person of the man of Galilee. Carefully buried are the old
historical accounts cited by the French historian Lacroix (1806-1884) (English
translation by Samuel Putnam, 1931, Coviei Friede, N.Y.) in his "History
of Prostitution."Aspasia, the heterai whom Pericles married and continued
to share with Socrates and Alcibiades, carries on a revolting dialogue
with Sacrates and advises him how he can secure Alciblades as his subject
for sodomy. Plato's obscene poems; his mistress Archaenesse to whose wrinkles
he wrote an ode the degradation of little children, outnumbering adults
in paying the prostitute tax to the city of Rome as lesbians and sodomites,
trained in that vice by their parents at the time of Christ; the sodomy
of Horace and all his foul poems, makes one realize the position of the
Light of the World in a sewer of Talmudic paganism. The Talmudic rule of
little children today is the same as in Christ's name; subjects for vice,
in direct opposition to that decreed by Christ.
Judaism - Talmud - Part 35
Luther on Plato
The Jewish Encyclopedia, ("Gentiles"): "Judah ben Ilai recommends
that the daily recital of the benediction,'Blessed be thou ...who hast
not made me a goy.'" this also has: "who hast not made me a woman," and
also "who hast made me an Israelite...who hast not made me a slave." this
is a "benediction" prescribed by the Talmud and listed under "Benedictions"
in the Jewish Encyclopedia.
Luther in his "The Jews and Their Lies"wrote:"they exalt themselves
and praise God for separating them from the heathen...In order that their
raving, frantic and foolish nonsense might be perfect, they praise and
thank God, first, that they are human beings and not animals; secondly,
that they are Israelites and not Goyim (heathen); thirdly, that they were
created as Men and not as Women. Such foolishness they do not have from
Israel, but from Goyim.
"For thus the historians write that the Greek Plato daily gave
such praise and thanks to God, if such blasphemy and haughtiness could
be called the praise of God. For that man (Plato) also praised his gods
for these three things, that he was a man and not an animal, a man and
not a woman, a Greek and not a non-Greek or barbarian. Such is the praying
of a fool and the praise of a blasphemous barbarian; just as the Mals imagine
that they alone are human beings and all the rest of the world nothing
but inhuman beings, ducks, or mice."
Luther Cites Christ - Esther
Luther quotes John 8:39, 44, wherein Crist told the Pharisees:
"Ye are of your father the Devil," and warns Christians to "be on their
guard against these hardened condemned people; who accuse God of lying
and proudly despise the whole world...They are boastful, proud fools..."
He goes on to call them "Liars and Bloodhounds." The book of Esther, which
Catholic and Protestant theologians in all centuries have protested as
being unhistorical, irreligious (the name of God does not once appear in
it) and out of place in the Bible, Luther then cites, The Jewish Publication
Society book on "Purim Anthology" (Philip Goodman, 1949) and points out
the inconsistency of Persian-run nobles giving permission to Jews to slaughter
Persians and calls attention to Purim having been a souse and gift festival
of Babylonians celebrating the triumph of the Babylonian sex-gods Bel Marduk
(Mordecai) and Ishtar or Astarte (Esther) over the rival sex-goddess Mashti
(Vashti). In the Persian city of Susa the colony of Babylonians had celebrated
this festiva, which, we are told, was refurbished at the time of the Maccabees
(168 B.C.) To put flight into their crowd. The victory of Judah the Maccabee
over the Syrian general Nicanor was celebrated and the day declared a holiday,
the 13th of Adar, 161 B.C. There is no mention of Purim in the New Testament,
no certainty that a king Ahasuerus mentioned in the book of Esther ever
existed. How about a Godly heroine bearing a pagan sex-goddess' name? Luther
wrote: "they are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have perverted and
falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end without ceasing with
their interpretations...O, how they love that book of Esther, which so
nicely agrees with their revengeful people; they who imagine themselves
to be the people of God, who desire to think they must murder and crush
the heathen...As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would
like to do so now, if only they could..." Here, Luther anticipated the
carnage of millions of Christians under the Talmudic Communist countries
Jews Worse Than The Heathen
Luther reflects that passage in 2 Peter 2 about those who "speak
great swelling words of vanity," promise liberty, but "they themselves
are the servants of corruption...For it had been better for them not to
have known the way of righteousness, than, after they had known it, to
turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them...according to the true
proverb, he dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was
washed to its wallowing in the mire."
Luther wrote: "How much better it would be if they did not have
God's Commandment or did not know it. For if they did not have it, they
would be uncondemned. They are condemned because they have God's Commandment
and do not keep it, but act against it without ceasing...In like manner
murderers and whores, thieves and scoundrels and all evil men could boast
they are God's holy and chosen people, because they have His Word and know
that they should fear and obey him..."
Luther then knew the Talmud, and continues: "The heathen philosophers
write much more honorably...They write that man by nature is obligated
to serve others, also to keep his word to his enemies...Yea, I maintain
that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in
all the books of the Talmudists and Rabbis and more than ever could come
into the hearts of the Jews. Should someone think I am saying too much;
I am not saying too much, but much too little! For I see in their writings
how they curse us Goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers.
They rob us of our money through usury...they play us all manner of mean
tricks; what is worst of all, they...teach that such should be done. No
Heathen has done such things and none would do so except the Devil himself,
and those whom he possesses like he possesses the Jews."
Luther goes into a dissertation showing he was familiar with the
letter and number tricks, by which adding the numerical value of a word
is used to create a new Talmudic meaning for Scriptural verses; devilish
ones. Luther goes into the perversion of the name of Jesus. Christ foretold
the numerical number of the anti-Christ's name as 666, according to Pharisee
custom now, as then (See under "Gematria, Notaricon, Temura in Jewish authorities).
Much of the "wisdom of the sages" depends on these number-letter tricks,
which are utterly cheap shyster stunts.
Calling Mary A Whore
Luther continues with the Talmud: "Thus they call Him (Jesus)
the child of a whore and His mother, Mary, a whore, whom she had in adultery...Reluctantly
I must speak so coarsely in opposing the Devil...We do not call our wives
whores as they call Maria, the Mother of Jesus; we do not call them bastards,
as they call our Lord Christ. We do not curse them, bu wish them all manner
of bodily and spiritual good; permit them to lodge with us. We don't steal
and mutilate their children; do not poison their water; do not thirst after
Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain
about being captives among us. Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1400 years
ago and during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted
by Jews in all the world. For nearly 300 years we might well complain that
during that time they captured and killed the Christians, which is the
clear truth. On poof that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought
them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem. On top of
that no one is holding them now. Land and highways are open to them...they
are a heavy burden to us in our country, like a plague, pestilence, and
nothing but misfortune...Should the Devil not laugh and dance, when in
this manner he can have his paradise among us Christians...and to think
us...blasphemes and curses God and man!...Now what are we going to do with
these rejected condemned Jewish people?"
Judaism - Talmud - Part 36
After Luther became conversant with the Talmud and the ritual
cursings of so-called "Judaism," his advice exactly matched that of the
ever-reenforced edicts of the beleaguered Popes. A person who condones
such blasphemies, he said, partakes of them.
He said they should be forced to leave the country (and so they
were from one country after another, but were always allowed back in when
a new greedy king came to the throne: Expulsions of Jews from Host Nations:
1). A.D. 250, Carthage; 2). 415, Alexandria; 3). 554, Diocese of Clement
(France); 4). 561, Diocese of Uzzes (France); 5). 612, Visigoth Spain;
6). 642, Visigoth Empire; 7). 855, Italy; 8). 876, Sens; 9). 1012, Mayence;
10). 1181, France; 11). 1290, England; 12). 1306, France; 13). 1348, Switzerland;
14). 1349, Hielbronn (Germany); 15). 1349, Hungary; 16). 1388, Strasbourg;
17). 1394, Germany; 18). 1394, France; 19). 1422, Austria; 20). 1424, Fribourg
& Zurich; 21). 1426, Cologne; 22). 1432, Savory; 23). 1438, Mainz;
24). 1439, Augsburg; 25). 1446, Bavaria; 26). 1453, Franconis; 27). 1453,
Breslau; 28). 1454, Wurzburg; 29). 1485, Vincenza (Italy); 30). 1492, Spain;
31). 1495, Lithuania; 32). 1497, Portugal; 33). 1499, Germany; 34). 1514,
Strasbourg; 35). 1519, Regensburg; 36). 1540, Naples; 37). 1542, Bohemia;
38). 1550, Genoa; 39). 1551, Bavaria; 40). 1555, Pesaro; 41). 1559, Austria;
42). 1561, Prague; 43). 1567, Wurzburg, Genoese Republic; 44). 1569, Papal
States; 45). 1571, Brandenburg; 46). 1582, Netherlands; 47). 1593, Brandenburg,
Austria; 48). 1597, Cremona, Pavia & Lodi; 49). 1614, Frankfort; 50).
1615, Worms; 51). 1619, Kiev; 52). 1649, Ukraine; 53). 1654, LittleRussia;
54). 1656, Lithuania; 55). 1669, Oran (North Africa); 56). 1670, Vienna;
57). 1712, Sandomir; 58). 1727, Russia; 59). 1738, Wurtemburg; 60). 1740,
LittleRussia; 61). 1744, Bohemia; 62). 1744, Livonia; 63). 1745, Moravia;
64). 1753, Kovad (Lithuania); 65). 1761, Bordeaux; 66). 1772, Jews deported
to the Pale of Settlement (Russia); 67). 1775, Warsaw; 68). 1789, Alace;
69). 1804, Villages in Russia; 70). 1808, Villages & Countrysides (Russia);
71). 1815, Lubeck & Bremen; 72). 1815, Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria;
73). 1820, Bremes; 74). 1843, Russian Border Austria & Prussia; 75).
1862, Area in the U.S. under Grant's Jurisdiction; 76). 1866, Galatz, Romania;
77). 1919, Bavaria (foreign born Jews); 78). 1938-45, Nazi Controlled Areas;
79). 1948, Arab Countries. (International Jewish Encyclopedia).
The degrading fate of those who mock the wise becomes horribly
apparent in the actual text of the Talmud. "He said: What is your
punishment? They replied with boiling hot excrement, since a Master has
said: Whoever mocks at the words of the Sages is punished with boiling
hot excrement." (Git. 56b)
Thrown Out: Jews have claimed over and over at every opportunity
that they have been innocent victims of anti-Semitism time and time again.
They are always portrayed on television and in the movies as being guilty
of no wrong doing, desiring only to practice their faith, and make an honest
living. An inquiring mind cannot help but wonder that, if this is the case
- that the Jews are innocent - why have the Jews been the brunt of persecution
so many times without cause?
If a man were accused of a serious crime and tried and found guilty
by a jury of his peers, we would find but little cause to put faith in
a claim by him of persecution. However if he insisted that this was exactly
the case, and that only because he believed differently than others was
he charged of misconduct, then we might grant him a second trial to assure
ourselves he had not been the victim of misjustice, believing with confidence
that the people would not a second time find an innocent party guilty of
crime that he did not commit.
If, at the conclusion of the second trial by another jury of peers,
the man is found guilty of an offense against the people, we have no reason
to listen to or place belief in continued cries of persecution. What does
this have to do with the Jew? Quite simple. Since the year 250 A.D., the
Jews have, by their own records and count, been expelled from eighty-one
(81) countries, nations, or political entities. Let's see now. Eighty-one
countries, eighty-one people's courts, eighty-one guilty verdicts, and
eighty-one cries of persecution.
The first time, maybe. The second time doubtful. But eighty-one
times to have been found worthy of expulsion for crimes against the people
of the countries they were in at the time? Such a claim stretches the limits
of human credulity beyond its most liberal bounds of endurance.
It has been said that the Jews protest to much. When one comes
to the realization of the fact that these different peoples in most cases
did not know of each other, or for that matter had not even heard of the
others existence, and yet determined, independently, over a two thousand
year span of time that the Jews were committing such serious crimes that
it was necessary to uproot them lock, stock and barrel in order to drive
them from their homes, many times with loss of life and great destruction
of property, it is then and only then, that a true appreciation of the
Jewish question is obtained).
We should not suffer it, after they are among us and we know about
such lying, (Note: As authorized by the Kol Nidre, etc.) "blaspheming and
cursing among them, lest we become partakers of their lies cursing, and
blaspheming...We are not permitted to take revenge. Revenge is around their
necks a thousand times greater than we could wish them. I will give you
my true counsel:
First: That we avoid their synagogues and schools and warn people
against them...that God may see that we are Christians and have not knowingly
tolerated such lying, cursing and blaspheming of His Son and His Christians.
For what we have so far tolerated in ignorance (I myself did not know it),
God will forgive us...Moses writes in Deuteronomy that where a city practiced
idolatry, it should be entirely destroyed with fire and nothing left. If
he were living today he would be the first to put fire to the Jewish schools
and houses (which follows with Scriptural support).
Secondly: That all of their books be taken away, prayer books,
Talmuds, and not one page of it be left...For they use all that only to
blaspheme the Son of God; that is God Himself...and will never use it any
Spiritually, Luther connects the Jews with those who betrayed
Moses: "Of such are the remaining dregs of the jews, of whom Moses knows
nothing: they also know nothing of him, for they do not keep one passage
in Moses." This reminds one of the constantly reoccurring charge of Christ
that the Pharisees violated and nullified the laws of Moses, such as: "The
Scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat." (Matthew 23:2) In other
words, they occupy His throne giving forth as Mosaic Law, their own foul
permissions which they attribute to "Oral" laws Moses handed down to their
own crowd unknown to the rest of the world, a think lie recognized as such
by the Rabbis.
Without any Jewish Encyclopedias or Soncino translations of the
Babylonian Talmud, one sees that Luther understood perfectly the way the
Talmud blasphemes and hangs obscene charges on Christ through double talk
and words. (The Balaam passages are an example of this, but Luther names
others). Luther recognized that any Messiah expected by the Jewry was only
to lead them in slaughter to power.
"The Jews desire no more from their Messiah than hat he should
be a Kochba (leader of the Pharisee revolt against Rome in 135 A.D., in
which about a million non-Jews were sadistically slaughtered, details being
cited by historian Gibbon, from ancient historical sources) and a worldly
king, who would slay the Christians, divide the world among the Jews and
make them rich lords..."
It is clear that Luther knew the Marranos, the Spanish word meaning
"swine," of which Talmudists are so proud, because it designated the some
300,000 Talmudists who deliberately invaded the Catholic Church of Spain
in order to accomplish what they did accomplish, and this they call the
"Golden Age" of Jewry, which was the complete take-over of church and state,
financial, educational, and ecclesiastic, to the helpless wrath of the
subject Spanish Christians. Only the Inquisition directed against Talmudic
tumors within the Church saved Christianity form extinction; as Talmudists
so well know today. Read Cecil Roth's "Marrano" Jewish Publication Society
"Political freedom is an idea but not a fact..." (Protocol 1:6)