How The Jews Have Repaid America and Its People For Giving Them Safe Refuge From A World That Hates Them
Part 6 of 9

Chapter Six

Jewish Subversion After the 1776 Revolt
Shays' Rebellion Battle For the
American Jubilee(1)

Shays' Rebellion And the Battle For the American Jubilee: The pusillanimous histories of the American Revolution and the early Republic, by Peter Marshall and similar writers, paint a rose-colored picture at variance with the documentary record. (But the Jews subverted the true purpose of the Revolution to their own agenda, unknown to the American people of the time).

The American revolutionaries fought for a reordering of society; indeed, for the overthrow of debt, usury and dispossession from the land, as symbolized by their objective of declaring the mighty legal earthquake that is the Biblical Jubilee. The Scriptural warrant for Jubilee was inscribed on the Liberty Bell and more importantly, upon the hearts of the ordinary men and women who had pledged their "lives, fortunes, and sacred honor" to the call to arms against oppression and tyranny, of July 4, 1776.

The Pollyanna historians have tended to paint the early years of the new republic as idyllic, even utopian, a time when the freedom-loving farmers found their hearts' desire and richly enjoyed the fruits of liberty which their blood, sweat and tears had made possible.

Patriot activists today enshrine those early times and cite them as precedent against the depredation of Clinton and Dole, Reno and Freeh, Kempt and Powell. It is a dangerous precedent to establish, born of historical illiteracy. The early Republic never did get around to declaring the Jubilee, though the great experiment in personal liberty begun in the wake of the Revolution was in general a blessing to mankind, in comparison to the fearsome oligarchies still holding power in Europe. (International Jewish Banking Power) But once the war had been won and the yeomanry were no longer the essential motive engine for securing independence from Britain, in many regions power was consolidated in the hands of reactionary (Jewish) mercantile interests.

The lawyers (Then, as now, most lawyers were Jews) and bankers had only gone underground during the Revolution and like all parasites were quick to re-emerge when peace was at hand, to declare their "right" to rule the manual laborers who had done the frontline fighting. As the watch-fob crooks came out of the wood-work, the veterans of '76 were there to meet them, first with petitions for redress of grievance and later with rifles.

Conservative historians declare that the Shays' Rebels were forerunners of Bolshevism, "ingrates" who sought to "level" frontier society into some disgusting precursor of Marxism. Such an interpretation can only be put forth by those who know little or nothing of the Bible-based aspirations of the American yeomanry.

There was nothing "Bolshevik" about Shays' Rebellion. The criminal class was not among the farmers, who Jefferson had nominated as the true "Chosen People" if ever there was one, but among the usual suspects lurking at the top of the Pharaonic pyramid. We had to smile when Pat Buchanan visited Los Angeles some years ago, in the wake of the devastating Mexican-African riots there, and proclaimed, in the coded weasel words of Republican conservatism, a statement to the effect that whites are better citizens than the Mexicans and Africans, because whites don't riot. In truth, the white race is the most insurrectionist nation the world has ever seen, or was, until feminism and TV flea'd the lion's rump and pared his claws.

The Second American Revolution: Massachusetts after the American Revolution was largely subsistence culture. Farmers made up more than half the population and these were independent freeholders who valued freedom over material wealth, eking out a living on the rocky soil, but reveling in their status as king of their own castle. These farmers jealously guarded their hard-fought status and were especially fearful of having to work off their land, for a wage, a condition they compared to peonage and slavery.

The life of the farming community in that era was close-knit and reflected in patterns of clan and kinship. Contrasted with this agrarian community was the cosmopolitan society of the seacoast towns. Here the focus was chiefly on the acquisition of wealth. Lawyers were at its center. Before the 18th century, New England's laws had been largely consonant with Bible law. The vocation of the law clerk was to help to implement the Mosaic statutes and facilitate, rather than obstruct, property and business transactions. But by the 1780s law had degenerated into a means fro the regular collection of debts and loans.

During the 1780s many clergymen collaborated with the mercantile elite. Money culture slowly replaced the Bible ethos in major coastal towns and the function of the ministry changed. Government-paid clergymen upheld usury from the pulpit. The tax-exempt status of New England ministers, coupled with the payment of their salaries mostly from tax funds, tied them to the lawyers and bankers.

The Reign of Shylock: Boston mercantile interests convinced yeomen to make their purchases on credit and accepted farm goods for payment. Retailers later withdrew credit from their farmer-customers and demanded payment in gold and silver. The yeomen faced the loss of their farms and merchants, lawyers and speculators stood to profit. Farmers were being trapped into a chain of debt. "The constables are vending (seizing) our is sold for about one-third the value, our cattle about one-half the value," angrily petitioned the townsmen of Greenwich, Massachusetts in January 1786.

Property seizures enraged the farmers and reinforced their fear of becoming landless "wage laborers." "The mortgage of our farms, we cannot think of with any degree of complacency," said a Conway, Massachusetts man. "To be tenants to landlords, who we know not and pay rents for lands purchased with our money and converted from howling wilderness into fruitful fields by the sweat of our brow, seems to carry with it in its nature truly shocking consequences."

Taxes were tilted against the landowners and in favor of the mercantile class. Thousands of farmers left the state for the western wilderness because of high property taxes. A small farmer without sufficient property for settling his debts faced an indefinite jail sentence. Considering the horrible state of New England jails during the 18th century, incarceration for indebtedness represented cruel punishment.

But Massachusetts retailers did not hesitate to throw indebted yeomen into prison. In Hampshire County from 1784 to December, 1786, they sent to jail for an average two-month term, seventy-three men with relatively small debts and arrested hundreds of other farmers. Significantly, no retailer sat in a jail cell.

The case of Timothy Begelow, an indebted Massachusetts farmer and Revolutionary War veteran who died in a damp cell of the Worcester County prison, became a cause c�l�bre among the farmers. One Hampshire County farmer and Revolutionary War veteran spoke of how he had "labored hard all his days" and did more than his share of the fighting against King George, but now, with the war over, and liberty supposedly realized, he had been "loaded with class-rates, lawsuits...hauled by sheriffs, constables and (tax) collectors." He predicted the lawyers would "get all we have." (2)

Now that the British king had been disposed of there were plenty of aspirants to his throne. New England's republican heritage was hardly the sole experience of colonial America. Even in New England the history of subjecting white laborers to some form of bondage went all the way back to Plymouth Rock.

There were bond servants on the Mayflower and a "goodly body" of white slaves aboard the Puritan fleet that arrived in Massachusetts in 1630. Georgia had been founded expressly as a penal colony for white slaves. Maryland had been a "semi-feudal domain, composed in part of manors owned by great landowners and tilled by white bond servants..."(3) The citizens of the new American Republic were determined to forge a heritage of freedom and to maintain the hardy and independent spirit which had sustained them in the New World. Unfortunately, matters were not necessarily resolved with their victory over the Redcoats, as many historians mistakenly allege. America had its own homegrown aristocrats who felt they were more deserving of elite privilege than the monarch across the sea.

The Founding Fathers had motivated the Continental army and the militias of the 13 colonies with vision of a post-Revolutionary Biblical Jubilee according to Leviticus 25, wherein all debts would be wiped out and everyone would start over in the new Republic with a clean slate. The American soldiers took them at their word: "With the ending of the American and the Treaty of Paris of September 3, 1783, there was jubilation in the streets. The future looked bright...Many people even...believed that their debts had been dismissed when the war ended." (4)

This was the promise represented by the inscription on the Liberty Bell, but it proved to be an empty one. Still, the yeomen were slow to wrath. They wanted to farm, not fight. Before turning to armed resistance, New England farmers sought justice through peaceful petitions. During the years 1784 to mid-1786, yeomen in the majority of Massachusetts' small towns forwarded their pleas to the Boston courts.

The farmers were not anxious for more blood-letting. They had faith in their new leaders and they sought relief through legal, non-violent means and channels, from the courts to the legislature. Since gold and silver were beyond their attainment, the oppressed New England farmers desired to have barter legalized through the currency of paper money, backed by silver and gold, which would represent so many bushels of corn or wheat or hours of labor. This demand was one of many of the reforms headed under the proposition, "tender laws."

These laws had been in effect in some areas of the colonies during the revolution, when the Founders were anxious to keep the moral of the yeomen high and their wrath focused on Britain. By means of the tenders laws, farmers paid their debts through a legalized form of barter, wherein crops were taken directly as payment or exchanged for specie.

The "Pests of Society": As their petitions increasingly fell on deaf ears, the citizens of the new Republic began to examine what force it was that chiefly obstructed them. Like the great anti-Masonic movement that would appear forty year later, the farmers discovered that one of the chief obstructions to reform was that class of parasite known as lawyers, who the farmers termed, "the pests of society" and "an altogether useless order."

In running up against the society of lawyers, the farmers felt their petitions were crashing against the equivalent of their famous New England stone walls. One of the rebels allied with Shays, Thomas Grover, gave as his reason for revolt, the "large swarm of lawyers...who have been more damage to the people at large, especially the common farmers, than the savage beasts of prey." (5)

As early as 1782, with the war with Britain still officially underway and the Treaty of Paris, concluding hostilities, a year off, the first stirrings of forceful resistance were exhorted by the radial activist Samuel Ely, a homeless, itinerant clergyman, who was not tax-exempt or tax-supported by the state. Ely was a hater of oppression and a ferocious opponent of the Massachusetts plutocracy. He told the farmers that the merchants and bankers who oppressed them should be "made a sacrifice of and given to the fowls of the air and the beasts of the field."

This was not just talk. In April of 1782, Pastor Ely roused a band of farmers in Northampton for an attack on the judges of the debtor's court. In a speech he told the farmers: "Come on, my brave boys, we'll go to the woodpile and get clubs enough to knock their grey wigs off and send them out of the world in an instant."

Then followed hand-to-hand combat between the farmers and the militia defending the courthouse. The farmers were driven off and Ely was seized and imprisoned. But not for long. Two months later, more than a hundred farmers attacked the building where Ely was confined and released him.

The following autumn farmers closed the debtor's court in Cheshire County, New Hampshire. In early 1783, American freemen, led by Job Shattuck of Massachusetts, assaulted tax collectors and tried to close the Springfield tax court. There was no U.S. Constitution at this time. The law of the Commonwealth was the 1780 Massachusetts constitution, widely derided by the yeomanry as a "lawyers and merchants constitution." In New England, only the territory of Vermont had a plan of government equitable to the working men. But in the midst of these early stirrings, most of New England's farmers continued to seek peaceful recourse. For three more years the majority prayed, petitioned and supplicated while the lawyer-controlled state capitals stonewalled.

Shutting Down the Courts: During this period the legislatures and courts issued anti-farmer rhetoric remarkably similar to the "hater" characterizations with which today's American patriot groups are tarred. The General Court of Massachusetts referred to the protesting farmers of 1786 as "traitors, incendiaries" and "vile creatures." The legislature threatened the farmers with arrest just for "daring to inquire into the present gross mismanagement."

In August the peaceful petitions came to an end. Though no violence was used, the farmers were no longer in a supplanting mood. A hardscrabble Pelham farmer and former American Continental army veteran, Captain Daniel Shays, began to organize a mass movement of courthouse closings. Shays' friend, George Brock, spoke for both when he said that he thought he saw in the politicians and lawyers of post-Revolutionary New England, the shadow of the same "aristocratical principle" the British had manifested. These veterans were not willing to tolerate a home-grown dictatorship under a patriotic gloss. Having been once again treated like subjects, once again they arose; like lions.

In September 600 farmers closed the courts in Worcester, as well as at the birthplace of the American Revolution, in Concord. 800 laborers united into a militia of their own making and closed the debt court at Great Barrington. 500 farmers marched on the court in Bristol County and shut it.

By September the rebellion had spread to New Hampshire, the "Live Free or Die" state where the farmers went their Massachusetts brethren one better: they seized the capital and held the governor and the legislature captive. In Western Massachusetts, the stronghold of the insurgents throughout the rebellion, Daniel Shays led 1500 farmers and laborers to Springfield where they occupied the courthouse for three days. By December 1786 Shays was at the head of an army of 9,000 farmers.

At no time were any of these protests a "mob action." The farmers marched into the towns with self-imposed military discipline. Through condemned as "seditionists" and "wicked rebels" by the Boston merchants and speculators, this was pure cant, since only twelve years before, in 1774, farmers had closed the Springfield court by similar means, to the general acclaim of the very men who now censured the populist actions of the post-Revolutionary yeomen.(6)

In a tone of outrage, the Secretary of War under the Articles of Confederation, Henry Kinos, wrote to George Washington that the Shays rebels "are determined to annihilate all debts public and private." Exactly! That's what the Jubilee constitutes. But some of the Founders would have none of it. "Washington was thoroughly frightened. On hearing the news he redoubled his efforts to obtain a stronger constitution; one that could afford national aid in suppressing such local disturbances."(7)

While the fortunes of the farmers' uprising in New Hampshire and Massachusetts were in ascendant in late 1786, incipient farmer revolts were put down by the militia in Vermont's Windsor and Rutland counties. The skirmish at the Rutland county courthouse involved an exchange of gunfire between the farmers and the militia. At New Haven, Connecticut, a courthouse seizure was halted by means of the mass arrest of the yeomen.

A Police State -- In 1787 America: In many cases the actions of the American Republic's ruling class in the post-Revolutionary years surpassed Janet Reno and Louis Freech in despotic arrogance. For example, in March of 1787, Vermont lawmakers enacted The Riot Act authorizing county sheriffs to shoot rebellious farmers on sight.

Meanwhile in Massachusetts, Governor James Bowdoin, part-owner of the Massachusetts State Back, whose worthless currency (on par with our present "Federal Reserve Note"), was a source of the farmers' wrath, was determined to crush Shays' Rebellion and called upon the militia to stop the farmers at the Worcester courthouse. To the utter consternation of the banker-governor, the Massachusetts militiamen refused. The militia commander, Jonathan Warner, reported, "Notwithstanding the most pressing orders, there did appear universally that reluctance in the people to turn out in support of the government." As one Shrewsbury judge noted, the Massachusetts militia were "too generally in favor of the people's measures" to turn their guns on their fellow farmers. This was true of the militia throughout Western Massachusetts. It sent shockwaves through the ranks of the (Jewish) lawyers and speculators and caused some to hope for the imposition of new monarchy.

Noah Webster, the famous lexicographer, found himself wishing for a "limited monarchy" after watching aghast as the people of the Massachusetts backwoods claimed their rights as Americans against the coastal merchant (mostly Jewish) elite: "I was once as strong a republican as any man in America. Now a Republic is the last kind of government I should choose. I would infinitely prefer a limited monarchy, for I would sooner be the subject of the caprice of one man than the ignorance of the multitude." (8)

Massachusetts began passing draconian laws curtailing the rights of the people and effectively establishing a dictatorship. The Massachusetts Riot Acts of 1786 ordered the killing of any rebellious farmer and instituted a property seizure law more tyrannical than even our contemporary confiscation laws. Rebellious farmers were to "forfeit all their lands, goods and chattels to the Commonwealth."

The legislature of Massachusetts also suspended the writ of habeas corpus. "Suspect" farmers could be placed in preventive detention and incarcerated indefinitely without trial. Freedom of speech was also banned if it was "to the prejudice of the government."(9) (Believe it or not) The chief sponsor of this shameful police state legislation was none other than the once great revolutionary, Sam Adams.

The farmers remained defiant, however, and continued to close courts. Governor Bowdoin sought help from the central government. The confederation Congress voted the state of Massachusetts a handsome war chest of more than a half million dollars and a force of 1,300 troops, but funds for the punitive campaign had to be appropriated by the individual thirteen states. Under the Articles of Confederation, the Congress had little power over the treasury.

The states constituted virtually separate nations and most could see no advantage in paying for a war against the people of Massachusetts. They refused to appropriate the monies and the scheme failed. The lawyers and bankers of Boston would have to pay for their war out of their own pockets, something this class of men has traditionally been loath to do. Without significant armed opposition, by early 1787, the farmers were beginning to establish a groundwork for economic reforms aimed at destroying usury and defanging the lawyers courts.

The Masonic Connection: The bankers and lawyers could no longer hide under color of law and the camouflage of government authority. It was obvious that the army they would raise would be a mercenary one, serving mammon, not justice. The personnel commanding the counter-revolutionary forces gave ample testimony of this. Government troops were led by judges of the debtor court such as Thomas Cobb and wealthy Freemasons, such as Benjamin Tupper, Hnery Lincoln, Rufus Putnam and John Paterson.

It would appear that the Shays uprising did not enjoy the approbation of the American based "Lodge," as the 1776 revolt had. It seems that only those rebellions sanctioned and partly stage-managed by Freemasonry were allowed to flourish in the new Republic.

This is not to suggest, as some critics have alleged, that the American Revolution was little more than an open-air masonic ritual. That is the propaganda of the lodge itself, claiming credit for the fundamentally decent and noble 1776 struggle for individual freedom, which was beyond its competence and resources to control, though it was undoubtedly a factor in the struggle.

The 1776 revolt was as legitimate and necessary a people's uprising as Shays' Rebellion. The Freemasons of America saw in the 1776 Revolution an opportunity and encouraged it in the hopes of channeling and controlling it. The shays Rebellion was another matter entirely. Now that America was free of Britain, the home-grown "commercial interests" intended to take charge of the parasitic enterprises of speculation and usury. Talk of "Jubilee" and Biblical justice was so much hogwash to the masonic money men.

An intriguing racial note was injected when the leader of the American Freemasonic Lodge, Prince Hall, offered the government the service of several hundred Negro masons in the shooting and suppression of the Shays farmers of Massachusetts. Recognizing that the spectacle of armed blacks making war against white yeomen might be just the spark that would ignite the overthrow of the Boston plutocracy, Hall's offer was politely declined. Hall ingratiated himself with the Massachusetts masonic elite in other ways, however, and contemporary Afro-American masonry is named in his honor and continues to serve an Uncle Tom function on behalf of the ruling class. According to researcher K.A. Badynski, the most prominent Prince Hall Freemason today is retired General Colin Powell.

The laws were stacked against the farmers and a high-paid mercenary army under able commanders was forming in Boston and would soon march against them. As the opposing camps formed for battle, one observer assessed the men comprising each side, indicating that Shays' ranks were made up of "the most laborious part of the people," from farmers to "reputable mechanics." Their foes consisted of, "lawyers, sheriffs...impost and excise collectors and their... servants and dependents."

Shays' men were unwavering in their resolve. Aaron Broad pledge, "I am determined to fight and spill my blood and leave my bones at the courthouse till Resurrection." Soon the raids against Shays began. 300 banker-paid troops, commanded by the lawyer Benjamin Hichborn, assaulted the home of Job Shattuck; in resisting the attack, Shattuck was slashed with a sword. Dozens of other farmer-leaders of the rebellion were seized and their homes invaded. "The seeds of war are now sown," proclaimed farmer Elisha Pownell on December 2, 1786.

While many of the upper class urged the farmers to surrender, the erudite Dr. William Whiting came to their defense, proving that the battle was not a class struggle, but a war between liberty and tyranny: "Whenever any encroachments are made either upon the liberties of the properties of the people, if redress cannot be had without, it is virtue in them to disturb government." Ethan Allen promised the commander of the Massachusetts state troops that Vermont would apprehend and return fugitive Shays men, who were camped by the hundreds in Vermont. Exactly two Shaysites were sent back; a couple of horse thieves.

If Allen was compelled to play politics in order to guarantee the autonomy of his beloved Vermont against the covetous designs of other states and factions, Thomas Jefferson was free to speak his mind. Jefferson's statement concerning Shays' uprising constitutes the intact voice of the '76 Revolution, untainted by the hypocrisy of some of the new lords of the American nation. He wrote: "I hold that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical...It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government."(10) Historian Marion Starker borrowed Jefferson's characterization for the title of her 1955 book about the Shays' movement, A Little Rebellion.

In April and May of 1787 star chamber "courts" tried captured Shays insurgents. Among these, John Bly and Charles Rose were hung. Pockets of farmer resistance continued for months and assaults on those who loaned money at interest, such as factory magnate Josiah Woodbridge, continued.

But Shays' rebels lacked funds and as hunted fugitives, it was difficult for them to maintain efficient organization. Daniel Shays' military strategy had not won the conflict and hard luck contributed to his men's losses. But neither can it be said that the Shays rebels were defeated.

Many were unknown to the government in an era before photographic wanted posters and telegraph communications. These men resurfaced as "reformers" and played a part in the resistance to the sedition laws of John Adams in 1798. Others like Says himself melted into the American frontier.

The wildlands of New York and Ohio offered territories with fewer laws, better soil and greater opportunities for free men. Some fared well, others never recovered form the loss of their farms and earthly possessions in Massachusetts. Daniel Shays and a hundred yeomen fled to New Hampshire after which they drifted apart and went separate ways. Captain Shays took up residence in upstate New York and lived the rest of his life in penury. He was so poor that upon his death his second wife didn't even bother to probate his will. The worth of combat is not always determined by success on the field. Those who will only fight if victory is guaranteed, are looking for an insurance policy, not a battleground.

In some cases the very act of resistance is so significant it is itself an achievement. By fighting the tyranny emanating from within, the farmers of western Massachusetts confirmed their ancient heritage of unending struggle for freedom. Thanks, in part, to Shays' Rebellion, the intractable fighting spirit of the yeomen of early America would remain kindled for decades to come, first in the anti-Federalist resistance to the U.S. Constitution of 1789 and the Sedition Act of 1798, and later, in 1826, a year after the deaths of Shays, in the populist movement against lawyers and Freemasons which shook the Northeast forcing the closure of masonic lodges across the region.

Daniel Shays, Luke Day, Job Shattuck and the other thousands of fighters, were not awed by the prestige of the Founding Fathers, or the glittering cosmopolitan works of their merchant "betters." They insisted on holding their leaders to the principles of 1776 and in compelling them to make good on the Jubilee.

In our time our people also wax sore with debt. Never was the cry of Jubilee more apropos or more necessary than now. Does the blood of Daniel Shays flow yet in our veins? (11)

horizontal rule

Chapter Seven
More Subversion of the Jews

Under this we could list:

(a) The American Civil War. "The division of the United States into two federations of equal rank was decided long before the Civil War by the High Financial Powers of Europe." (12)

U.S. Congressional Record, June 26, 1939, Hon. Jacob Thorkelson of Montana, "Shall Constitutional Government Prevail?"

Mr. Thorkelson. "Mr. Speaker, it is my desire to call attention to an article which was published in the Pathfinder of June 24, on page 15,, which to me clearly revealed the character of those who own or manage the paper. True to their stripes, and similar to all Communists, the editors of the Pathfinder evidently disapprove when Members of Congress respect their oath of obligation. These editors are no doubt of the variety which prefers the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion to the Constitution of the United States. I am rather amused when this obnoxious tribe begins to spit its communistic venom for it can only end, as it has before, in endless wandering.

It is the first time the Communist Defamation League has made a personal attack upon me, and 1 hope it will be the last time, for I want to be charitable. Thousands of real patriotic Americans in all classes of society are very well aware that character destruction or 'smearing' is a Communist stock in trade, but the cloak is now worn and frayed. The gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Sabath) is quoted in this paper as having said: 'The gentleman from Montana has time and again stuffed the Record with column after column of material generally of a highly obnoxious and bigoted nature. At the same time, while the extended remarks were never made on the floor of this House, they appear as having been actually spoken here...I will object to any intolerant and ridiculous dissertations calculated to promote prejudice and class hatred.'

I shall refrain from criticizing the most venerable gentleman from Illinois, for he is only his master's voice, wailing in the wilderness of communism. When the venerable gentleman blows warm, he glorifies the President. When he blows cold, he reviles an ex-President, Mr. Hoover. This, I observe, is the extent of the venerable gentleman's statesmanship.

In replying to the Pathfinder's observations on cost for inserts in the Congressional Record, I can say such expense will be a mere bagatelle as compared to the cost of internal strife and revolution which is now contemplated and financed by the same people who financed the World War, the Russian revolution, and the Spanish revolution. As a matter of fact, if every Member in Congress would stand forth in the protection of the constitutional rights of the people, communism and its allied creed would find no place in the United States.

I am, however, delighted to find that the writer of the article in the Pathfinder compares me with General Moseley, for the general is, indeed, a stanch American and so recognized in the United States Army, in which he served with distinction. He is also recognized as a loyal American by Congress, for he has been decorated twice for distinguished service to the country. His clarification of an issue before the Dies Committee again entitles him to further national distinction for his service to the Nation.

The venerable gentleman's objection did not prevent my remarks from being placed in the Record, as the Pathfinder's article implies, for my remarks will be found in the issue of June 19,, and I shall ask the editorial staff of the Pathfinder to read them.

I am not upset about the international press, as implied in this article, except in its abject submission to the rulers of the invisible government, and in its betrayal of the people whom it is supposed to serve with truth. I am not looking for, neither do I desire mention in any publication of the international subsidized press, or in the Pathfinder, and it is indeed unfortunate that it took the liberty of mentioning me in the manner it did, for it has now classified itself.

I can only say that the press is using good judgment in remaining silent upon patriotic activities, a quality which the Pathfinder should observe, for unjust criticism might entail danger. When 120,000,000 people discover how they have been sold down the river by those who swore to preserve, protect, and defend their rights and liberties, it is possible that reprisals may result.

I also note in the June 26 Times-Herald that The Washington Merry-Go-Round labels myself and two others 'Nazis.' This is not strange, for when anyone speaks on the constitutional rights of the people and opposes communism one of the wailing prophets sticks out his head and shouts 'Nazi!'

The capitalistic barons who are financing the Red activities in the United States may believe that their agents have a stranglehold on American labor, but they might find themselves mistaken in that, for as I know labor, they are staunch and patriotic American citizens. During my campaign, when I talked on communism and on constitutional government, the greatest appreciation was expressed, not by the 'white collar' group, but by the real workers, or the men that I, as a doctor of medicine, called upon in their private homes.

It was these men who said, 'We heard you over the radio. When are you to speak again?' And it was these people who expressed their firm belief in the Constitution of the United States. It was our so called professors and educators who were slightly pink or even red in their expressions. It is this same group of professors, economists, and educators that are now attempting to run the sovietized Government of the United States, and their lack of ability is clearly evident in the condition in which we find ourselves today. When the American working people realize that they are used as stooges by the money changers, and the international Communists who are now promoting and paying for the cost of such activities in the United States, I am sure that they will wash their hands of this deadly communistic poison, and rally to the colors' as all patriotic citizens of course will do.

The plan to sovietize the United States should be clear to everyone, for it is now coming to the front in its true light. Congress has been an instrumental aid in bringing this thing about by bestowing greater and greater powers on one man. He, having the power to appoint and place anyone he chooses in key positions in the governmental departments and forces, may, of course, provide people upon whom he can depend to support him in consummation of whatever plan he has in mind. There is an advantage in having good Communists in key positions, and I do not deny that this is a part of the Soviet plan. It should be clear to all. If the Government intended to adhere to the Constitution, Congress would not be requested to mutilate the document by bestowing power on individuals contrary to what is set forth in the Constitution itself. There is no purpose or reason for breaking constitutional government down unless it is to be replaced by some other form, and the people should ask themselves just what the President intends to do.

Conversion of our Government can easily take place without the public's being aware of such intrigue, and this is particularly true when those who are supposed to represent the people fail to maintain the commanding power of Congress itself. I am now dealing with cold facts, and I challenge Congress to prove that we are not departing from sound constitutional principles. If the President of the United States had the interest of the people at heart, why did he allow the money changers to take charge of all the gold and establish ownership of it? If the President had the interest of the United States and the welfare of the people at heart, why does he not order the Army, Navy, and the F.B.I. Intelligence Services to bring in and apprehend all Communists and those who are advocating destruction of our Government? Is it to the interest of the United States to allow military secrets to be revealed to foreign nations, particularly to the Soviet Union? Is it to the interest of the Nation to destroy business and replace it with Federal-owned corporations similar to many of those now operating contrary to the Constitution itself? Is it to the interest of the people that we maintain the Export and Import Bank? Is this all for the general welfare of the people, or is it for the general welfare of those who are anticipating taking charge of the Government?

Is it for the general welfare of the United States to loan money to South America where it is already indebted to us, to be used in competition with our own agriculture and manufacturing industries? Is it for the general welfare of the people to import agricultural products when the same can be produced in the United States? Is it for the general welfare to destroy our own agriculture and balance international trade by the sale of war machinery? Does unsound and unsecured hocus-pocus money bring about business confidence; and are excessive taxes an aid to business? These are questions that someone; maybe the Pathfinder, can answer.

If the President is interested in sound constitutional government, it may be well for him to follow the Constitution, because he has assumed the same obligation that I and other Members of Congress have assumed. I am trying to live up to mine. Let the others do the same, and the people and the Nation will be well protected.

We must have a premise or fundamental basis from which we may set our course. In the United States it is the Constitution, and we must use this as it was given to us - namely, as a point of departure. Sovietizing this instrument, as has been done in the past, can only lead us off the course, and the plight we are in today is sufficient evidence to anyone that there are breakers to the lee of us." (13)

The ways and characteristics of the Jews do not change toward Christianity and White Christians in particular, and this treachery against God's Israel people can and did recur again; in America, in the 1860s, with the American Civil War. Here was a war not only planned and instigated by the Jews, such as the Rothschilds, but both sides were financed by Jewish banks.

When the Southern states laid devastated in the aftermath of the war, the Jewish/Marxist plan of reconstruction was established to further destroy the White rule and culture. The South was put under military government and Whites were deprived of their rights, their Constitutions, and their property. Entire plantations were destroyed, burned and pillaged to deny the White Southerners their inheritance.

Entire White Southern families were murdered and their property given to Negroes and to Jewish financiers. Other Jewish carpetbaggers from the North, such as the Lehmans, the "seven liberal-minded" Seligman brothers, the Baruchs, and other special emissaries of the Rothschilds, came to seize from the widows and orphans of the Confederate dead their last savings, their last possessions, and their lands and homes.

This mode of treachery of Edom, the Jews, again surfaced during World War II. When Germany had been defeated at the end of the war, and the Allied forces had suppressed its military and rendered it defenseless, it was the Edomite Jews, with the aid of the Edomite Jew Dwight D. Eisenhower, of the Red Soviet Union that had poured into the nation to rape, plunder, destroy and kill Germans.

As with Judah, the Edomite Jews "shed the blood" of Germans "by force of the sword in the time of their calamity." This act was a typical Edomite style of revenge upon God's people (Germany). The Jews always, whenever possible, attacks and plunders Jacob/Israel only when they are in a weakened and helpless state.

In February, 1945, when the war was almost over, the city of Dresden was repeatedly bombed and destroyed to satisfy the hate and revenge of the Jews. Dresden was the culture center of German and not a military or industrial target. Over 250,000 men, women and children were slaughtered by the half-Jew Churchill (England) and the Jewish President of the United States Franklin D. Roosevelt.

The persecution and destruction of White Christian people by the Jews is not a recent thing but reaches far back into history. Writing in the April, 1921 issue of the, "Hebrew Christian Alliance Quarterly," the Rev. M. Malbert stated: "I am going to show that real religious persecution is uniquely Jewish...In the time of Justinian, in the sixth century, the Jews massacred Christians in Caesarea and destroyed their churches. When Stephanus, the governor, attempted to defend the Christians, the Jews fell on him and slew him. In 608 A.D. the Jews of Antioch fell upon their Christian neighbors and killed them with fire and sword...About 614 A.D. the Persians advanced upon Palestine and the Jews, after joining their standard, massacred the Christians and destroyed their churches. Ninety thousand Christians perished in Jerusalem alone." (14)

Judah P. Benjamin, Rothschild Agent: "Napoleon's object was to assure the predomination of the French over the Latin races and to augment the influence of these races in America. Napoleon decided to recognize the independence of the rebellious American States and repeatedly urged the British government to join him in so doing." (15)

Judah P. Benjamin was chosen by the Rothschilds to do their work in the United States and he was the first adviser to Jefferson Davis, the President of the Southern Confederacy. Benjamin has been called "the brains of the revolt." He was also the Secretary of State of the Confederacy under Jeff Davis.

The Confederacy consisted of eleven Southern States bound by a written Constitution, modeled in part after our own Constitution. It was founded on the fundamental principle that each one of its eleven constituted States had the right to secede from the Union, or to separate from the other 23 out of the 34 states of the Union.

Nevertheless, at the instigation of Benjamin, and under pressure of Napoleon, Texas and Louisiana were placed on the bargain counter in exchange, presumably, for Napoleon's aid. The latter was supported by Disraeli of England, who had assured the Confederacy of the support of Britain behind the nine remaining States, after Texas and Louisiana were to be ceded to France.

Under the guiding hand of Judah P. Benjamin {a Jew}, chosen by the Rothschilds and the Church of Rome to represent the International Bankers to do their work for them in the United States, was also the first advisor to Jefferson Davis, the President of the Southern Confederacy. Benjamin is reputed to be the "brains of the revolt," as he was also the Secretary of State of the Confederacy.

Through the hands of this man, huge sums of money were provided to finance the destruction of this great New Christian American Republic flowed. The Confederacy fell and the men who had fought a valiant fight for what they believed right were thrown into the even greater travail of the Reconstruction; while Judah P. Benjamin, almost alone of the leaders of the South, forsook immediately the suffering people who had honored and enriched him, fled to England and was soon embarked upon a new career of distinction and wealth, Reminiscent of others of his kind {Jewish} dispossessed of their temporary cause and gains.

While we are talking of the Civil War it behooves us to mention again that Abraham Lincoln (who was Jewish, but he had outlived his usefulness, so he was made a martyr, the Jews could later use to help bring Communism into the United States) was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth {A Jew}.

The plot of Booth, involved not only the assassination of Lincoln, which was accomplished, but also the assassination on the same night of the Vice President, Andrew Johnson, of the Secretary of State, William H. Seward, and of General Ulysses S. Grant. Seward, who was ill at his home, was stabbed, as was also his son, Frederick Seward, by David E. Herold {A Jew}, a co-conspirator with Booth, who was hanged. Vice President Johnson escaped injury, but George A. Atzerodt {also a Jew} was hanged for conspiring with Booth to kill him. General Grant, who was to have attended the theater with Lincoln that night, due to an unexpected departure for Burlington, New Jersey, was unharmed.

Our American school children have been taught that the Civil War was fought over the slavery problem, but this was only a surface issue to hide the intrigue of the Great Red Dragon to foment one side against the other. After thousands of our choice White Israel sons and one of our greatest Presidents were murdered, our Great God stopped the slaughter of the Dragon; By the Intervention of the Czar of Russia, who God sent to our National Rescue, but unknown to most Americans.

Our childrens' history textbooks continue to teach that the American Civil War was fought over the Slavery issue. But if we look behind the scenes we will find that the "slave question" was but the surface issue. Below the surface ran a current of intrigue that ended with the assassination of Abraham Lincoln because he was determined that the United States was to be free from the bondage of the International Jewish Bankers.

The part the Catholic Church through the Jesuits has already been presented. Now we will present the "Rest of The Story." In 1857, the Rothschild Illuminati bankers ruled Europe.

Division Of U.S. Plotted In London: Disraeli, the late Jewish Prime Minister of England, determined to divide the United States and give one part to Lionel {Rothschild}. Thus the North would become a British Colony annexed to Canada. The South would go to Napoleon {Rothschild}. In the year 1857, the money power of old Europe was centered in the House of Rothschild. Disraeli represented them in England; Napoleon III in France; Bismarck in Germany and Mazzini in Italy. According to Mr. John Reeves, who wrote on page 228, of an authorized biography entitled "The Rothschilds, The Financial Rulers of Nations," based on research in their own archives, there was a famous meeting in the City of London in 1857. The Rothschild family was assembled from the countries of Europe for the marriage of Lionel Rothschild's daughter, Leonora, to her cousin, Alphonse, son of James Rothschild of Paris.

It was at this time Disraeli is reported to have said: "Under this roof are the heads of the family of Rothschild -- a name famous in every capital of Europe and every division of the globe. If you like, we shall divide the United States into two parts, one for you, James, and one for you, Lionel. Napoleon will do exactly and all that I shall advise him." Thus, in London, we see a plan fostered by the money power of Europe, moving in on America, and pitting the North against the South under the old principle of "divide and conquer."

Intervention Of The Czar Of Russia Saved The United States: Disraeli and the Catholic Church had already assured the Confederacy of Britain's support. However, this was not to help the South; it was to crush both the North and the South and to conquer and possess both.

As a result, English, French and Spanish troops were landed at Vera Cruz in 1862. The French General, Bazaine, occupied the capitol of Mexico at the time. "We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people." (16)

So Napoleon was ready to strike and help divide and destroy the United States. The danger was great. The situation looked hopeless. Understanding the situation Lincoln spent long nights in humble prayer to Almighty God. He knew the North, alone, could not withstand such a combination. Moreover, Archduke Maximilian had been induced to accept the throne of Mexico. But God stepped in. Fortunately God in His wisdom exposed this Satanic plot to the Christian Czar of Russia through his Ambassadors in Paris and London; who upon learning of the Rothschild - Disraeli - Catholic - Napoleonic plot immediately dispatched a fleet of ships and men to San Francisco under the command of Admiral S. Lesowsky.

He also rushed a squadron to New York to New York under the command of Admiral A.A. Popoff. Both Admirals had orders from the Czar to be ready to fight any power {nation} on earth, and to take their orders directly from President Abraham Lincoln; and him alone. Needless to say, this quick, generous and vigorous action saved the United States from the intrigue of the International Jewish Bankers. So James Rothschild was left without Mexico and the Southern States, and Lionel could not capture the North through military measures.

But the European Machevillis were determined on financial conquest, if not actual slavery. At the same time, this great and good Christian Czar, who, as the servant of Almighty God and by His Power, saved the United States, lovingly and voluntarily emancipated 47 million serfs on September 19, 1861, and Translated the Entire Bible into the Russian language. For his courageous and benevolent acts, he was murdered by the Atheistic, God-hating, one-world, Jewish bankers in 1881. He was another casualty in the conflict of the ages. The conflict between right and wrong, light and darkness, good and evil, Christ and anti-Christ, God and Satan.

The same devils murdered Lincoln on April 4, 1865. The history books lie about why Booth killed Lincoln. Coded messages in Booth's trunk and the key to these codes in Judah P. Benjamin's possession proved that Lincoln - was murdered by orders from the Jewish Rothschild Bankers and the Jewish Sanhedrin. Their successors are still doing the same today.

Booth's Code Found In Benjamin Trunk: The good Czar, after several unsuccessful attempts on his life, was murdered in 1881. Lincoln was murdered in 1865, on April 4th, by an actor, John Wilkes Booth, in whose trunk was found coded messages the key to which was found in Judah P. Benjamin's possession. Benjamin escaped to England where he later died. The Czar, Alexander II, had been responsible on September 19, 1861, by imperial decree, for emancipating the Russian serfs, in number over 47-million. Serfdom in Russia was ended by the stroke of a pen. But in the United States, it took billions of dollars and oceans of blood to free three million, not serfs, but slaves, because of an infamous plot of English and European Jewish money lords. "The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the High [Jewish] Financial Powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid of the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw tremendous booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies, indebted to the Jewish financiers, to the vigorous Republic, confident and self-providing. Therefore, they started their emissaries to work in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus to dig an abyss between the two parts of the Republic.

Lincoln never suspected these underground machinations. He was anti-Slaverist, and he was elected as such. But his character prevented him from being the man of one party. When he had affairs in his hands, he perceived that these sinister financiers of Europe, the Rothschilds, wished to make him the executor of their designs. They made the rupture between the North and the South imminent! The master of finance in Europe made this rupture definitive in order to exploit it to the utmost. Lincoln's personality surprised them. His candidature did not trouble them; they though to easily dupe the candidate woodcutter. But Lincoln read their plots and soon understood, that the South was not the worst foe, but the Jew financiers. He did not confide his apprehensions, he watched the gestures of the Hidden Hand; he did not wish to expose publicly the questions which would disconcert the ignorant masses.

Lincoln decided to eliminate the international banker by establishing a system of loans, allowing the States to borrow directly from the people without intermediary. He did not study financial questions, but his robust good sense revealed to him, that the source of any wealth resides in the work and economy of the nation. He opposed emissions through the international financiers. He obtained from Congress the right to borrow from the people by selling to it the 'bonds' of the States.

The local banks were only too glad to help such a system. And the Government and the nation escaped the plots of the foreign financiers. They understood at once, that the United States would escape their grip. The death of Lincoln was resolved upon. Nothing is easier than to find a fanatic to strike.

The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom, continues Bismarck (Bismark did not know the darkness of Lincoln's treason, and Bismark was a half Jew, therefore, his remarks were also made to deceive Christians into thinking that Lincoln was a Great American, and Not the Traitor he actually was). There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots. And Israel went anew to grab the riches of the world. I fear that Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America, and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos, in order that 'the earth should become the inheritance of Israel.'" (17)

(b) Spanish American War.

"In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; Have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian Religion upon which that nation is founded by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within a state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of SPAIN and Portugal. For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, they call Palestine. But, Gentlemen, should the world today give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some cogent reason for not returning (Even today the Zionists have to force Jews to migrate to the present day state of Israel).

Why? Because they are Vampires, and Vampires do not live on Vampires. They cannot live only among themselves, they must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in this Constitution in less than 200 years They will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land, and Change our form of government(Which they have done -- they have changed it from a Republic to a Democracy), for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty.

If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them sustenance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, Gentlemen, are Asiatics; let them be born where they will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even though they live among us ten generations. A Leopard cannot change its spots.

Jews are asiatics (Here we have proof that Benjamin Franklin knew that the Jews were Khazars: Not Israelites), they are a menace to this country if permitted entrance and should be excluded by this Constitution." (18)

(c) World War I.

"I participated with Herzl in the first Zionist Congress which was held in Basle in 1897. Herzl was the most prominent figure at that first Jewish World Congress. He worked to achieve an object which had been fixed beforehand. Just as Isaiah foresaw, decades before the event occurred, the victorious power of Cyrus before anyone else, so did Herzl foresee twenty years, before we experienced them, the revolutions brought about by the Great War, and he prepared us for that which was going to happen. He foresaw the splitting up of Turkey, and he foresaw that England would obtain control over Palestine. 'We may expect important developments in the world.' These were the words spoken by Herzl twenty years before the Great War. He added that the events would offer the Jewish people fresh opportunities." (19); "Wars are the Jews Harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100-million of them, and the end is not yet." (20)

(d) World War II.

January 16, 1939, Ambassador Jerzy Potocki, reports to the Minister of Foreign Affairs in Warsaw as follows: "The day before yesterday I had a lengthy conversation with Ambassador Bullitt in the Embassy, where he called on me. He is traveling to Paris on the 21st inst. with trunks full of instructions and reports of conversations from President Roosevelt and the Department of State and from the Senators belonging to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. The content of these directions I was informed were:

1). A new impulse in foreign policy inspired by President Roosevelt who sharply and emphatically condemns the totalitarian states.

2). The war preparations of the United States on sea, land and in the air, which are being executed at an increasing speed at the colossal expense of $1,250,000,000.

3). A moral assurance that the United States are abandoning their policy of isolation and in case of war are ready to grant active support to Britain and France, America being prepared to take her whole financial and material resources at their disposal.'

In the report to the Polish Minister for Foreign Affairs, November 21, 1948 Count Jerzy Potocki, Polish Ambassador in Washington, in conversation with Mr. Bullitt in his office, then spoke about Britain's complete unpreparedness for war, and about the impossibility of adapting British industry to massed production, especially in regard to the manufacture of airplane. He spoke with unusual enthusiasm about the French army, but confirmed my opinion that the French air force was antiquated. According to what military experts told Mr. Bullitt during the crisis in the autumn of 1938, a future war would last for at least six years and would, in their opinion, end in the total destruction of Europe and the establishment of Communism in every state. Without doubt Soviet Russia would stand to gain most when the war was over.

He further said, he, Bullitt believed that the war was inevitable and that, at its close, power alone could put an end to Germany's mad aspirations to expand. He said, in response to Potocki's question of "What the war would be like,' that the United States, France and Britain must rearm on a gigantic scale if they were to be able to confront Germany. "Asked further if the United States would participate in a war of this kind,' he replied, 'Without the slightest doubt, but only if Britain and France make the first move.' The report on the international situation from Portugal to Warsaw tells us that Lt. Col. Chamberlain of the British Military, that he and the other younger members of the Staff agree that Germany and Italy are bluffing and that it is for us to begin the war and the sooner the better.

They felt that right now they could count on the help of the United States. American attache' who told me that 'Our ideals are wholly in sympathy with those of the democracies! At the moment the United States are studying possibilities of speedy assistance for Britain and France. We have come to the conclusion that our assistance must not only, as in the Great War, begin with the active-cooperation of American troops after one year of the war has elapsed, but that 1000 airplane must be dispatched within a week or ten days after war has broken out.' Commander Gade is a man of great integrity and a personal friend of President Roosevelt's. Some will recall the late Honorable Senator Ernest Lundeen's words to the women who had assembled in Washington to appeal to the Congress against the Conscription Bill. He told us that, '1400 planes had already been sent to France. This was in 1940 when we were hearing again and again that our boys would not be sent to fight on foreign soil. That the Conscription Bill was merely a training bill.'" Training for what?(21)

"The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism." (22); "Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child." (23); "We are not denying and we are not afraid to confess, this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry...Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based. We are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan Horses in the enemy's fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory." (24); "Whenever an American or a Filipino fell at Bataan or Corregidor or at any other of the now historic spots where MacArthur's men put up their remarkable fight, their survivors could have said with truth: 'The real reason that boy went to his death, was because Hitler's anti-Semitic movement succeeded in Germany.'"(25); "In death as in life, I defy the Jews who caused this last war [WW II], and I defy the powers of darkness which they represent. I am proud to die for my ideals, and I am sorry for the sons of Britain who have died without knowing why." (26)

(e) The Korean Police Action 1950-1953, with 54,246 American deaths and 157,630 casualties; Korea. U.S. responded to North Korean invasion of South Korea by being ordered to go to its assistance by the United Nations; Congressional Authorization was not sought.

The Korean fiasco aroused American voters who were offered, the Jew, Dwight D. Eisenhower for President, a soldier who they thought would surely win that ridiculous war. Eisenhower did end the war, but not by winning which could easily have been done, but by yielding to Communist terms and insults he provided the festering sore of a divided Korea.

The beginning of "no win" engagements all over the world, which demonstrates to those who will stop and look: Those people who depend upon the United States Government in an alliance, is a kiss of death for their freedom. This because our American Government is under the control of the Jewish-Communist-Zionists the antichrist Children of Satan!!! This was also the first time in the history of the world, of any nation, when its military command was forbidden to defeat the enemy.

The Jewish President Dwight D. Eisenhower was responsible for sending American troops to fight in Vietnam. This fact has been conveniently overlooked by historians and our children is not told about his compliancy in this. Thus, America lost thousands of America's best because of another Jewish President!

The First No-Win War In History: In 1944, the Council on Foreign Relations prepared a confidential memorandum for the State Department that began the process of involving the United States in a war in Korea. It read, in part: "The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything approaching a super-state organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used to further popular education..."

A review of the memorandum stated: "...a further difficulty was cited, namely that {difficulty} arising from the Constitutional provision that only Congress may declare war. This argument was countered with the contention that a treaty would override this barrier, let alone the fact that our participation in such police action as might be recommended by the international security organization need not necessarily be construed as war." (27) That treaty was the United Nations Treaty, created in 1945, essentially by the CFR. The Korean War had a unique place in history: "...for the first time, a world organization voted to use collective force to stop armed aggression." (28)

The Korean War was made possible at the Potsdam and Yalta conferences, as World War II was ending, when the Allied Governments, represented by Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt, divided Korea into a North and South. North Korea quickly created an army of 187,000 men, with Russia supplying the military equipment {the artillery, tanks and planes, etc.} necessary to wage the war.

The South only raised an army of 96,000 men, with sparse military equipment. One of the reasons for this inadequacy of their military equipment was the fact that, even though the United States had voted $10-billion in military assistance for South Korea, only a small percentage of it reached that country.(29)

General Douglas MacArthur, who was later to command these forces, wrote in his book Reminiscences: "The south Koreans had four divisions along the 38th Parallel {the dividing line between North and South Korea}. They had been well trained, and the personnel were brave and patriotic, but they were equipped and organized as a constabulary force, not as troops of the line. They had only light weapons, no air or naval forces, and were lacking in tanks, artillery, and many other essentials. The decision to equip and organize them in this way had been made by the State Department. The argument advanced by the State Department for its decision was that it was a necessary measure to prevent the South Koreans from attacking North Korea, a curious myopic reasoning that, of course, opened the way for a North Korean attack." (30)

But North Korea's attack should not have come as a surprise as General Albert Wedemeyer had warned President Harry S. Truman that the North Koreans were preparing for an invasion. On June 25, 1950, they crossed the 38th Parallel and started the war.

The Russians could have prevented the United nations from getting involved had they wished to do so by vetoing the U.N. efforts: "The Soviets, using the non-membership of Red China in the U.N. as an excuse, walked out of the Security Council. The Council, with Russia absent, then voted U.N. intervention in Korea. After the vote, and with Red China still not seated in the United nations, the Soviet returned to the Security Council."(31)

Some have seen Russia's absence during this crucial vote as an intentional maneuver on their part: "...the Soviet started the war themselves. This means that they knew when it would start. If they wanted to keep us out, Stalin would have told his U.N. delegate, Jacob Malik, to forget the boycott, to take his seat at the Security Council, and vote nyet {no}. The very fact that the Soviet didn't do this is proof, not just that they didn't want to keep us out of the Korean War, but that they wanted to trick us in." (32)

Two days after the invasion of South Korea, the Chinese on Taiwan, sensing that the time was ripe for them to move against the Communist Government on mainland China, got severely reprimanded by the Jewish President Truman: "...I am calling upon the Chinese Government on Formosa {Taiwan} to cease all air and sea operations against the mainland." (33)

Not only did Truman declare it was against American policy for the free Chinese to reclaim Communist China, but he also ordered the American 7th Fleet into the Straits of Formosa to insure this. (34) General Douglas MacArthur later revealed that he saw this action as an intentional act on the part of the American Government to insure the entry of Red China into the war.

He wrote: "The possibility of Red China's entry into the Korean War had existed ever since the order from Washington, issued to the Seventh Fleet in June, to neutralize Formosa, which in effect protected the Red China mainland from attack by Chiang-Kai-Shek's forces of half a million men. This released the two great Red Chinese armies assigned the coastal defense of Central China and made them available for transfer elsewhere." (35); "This mean that the Communist China leaders need have little worry about a possible Nationalist landing on the mainland opposite Formosa, and that they could move Red troops northward to the Manchurian country above the Yalu River with perfect safety. It gave their Korean war plans a tremendous impetus, because Red China could now enter the Korean War at any time she chose without fear of being attacked on her flank and rear by the nationalist troops on Formosa."(36)

But this action by the American government did not deter the Taiwanese Government of Chang Kai-Shek, who, less than a week after the North Koreans had crossed the 38th parallel, offered; "...the State Department an advance force of 33,000 troops that could be embarked for Korea within five days after the offer was accepted. The suggestion was refused." (37)

Formosa was, at the time, a member of the United Nations and therefore could have been represented in the United Nations Force, but the American Government would not tolerate such a move. It was a few months later that the results of the State Department's tactics began to show up. In October, 1950, General MacArthur began sensing that the Red Chinese were building up their troops in Manchuria, just north of the Yalu River. This intelligence report went unheeded by the State Department which advised MacArthur that there was no possibility of their intervening in the war.

But the State Department had lied, as the Red Chinese crossed the Yalu river, the river separating North Korea and Red China, on October 15, 1950. As the war against Red China and the North Koreans continued, General MacArthur continued to feel that there had been a leak in his intelligence and that his strategy was known in advance to the enemy. One of MacArthur's senior field commanders, General Walton Walker: "...continually complained...that his operations were known to the enemy in advance through sources in Washington." (38)

The truth is that MacArthur's strategies were, indeed, falling into the hands of the North Koreans who were being commanded by Russian Officers. The chain of command under the United States Constitution for any military officer leads upward through the Executive Branch of the government and ends with the President who is the ultimate authority for military decisions.

MacArthur was, of course, constitutionally required to obey the orders of his ultimate commander, but under the treaty binding the United States to the United Nations, the command chain went past the President into an office in the United Nations known as the under-secretary for political and security council affairs who reported directly to the Secretary General.

Because of a secret agreement made by our Secretary of State the Jew Edward Stettinius in 1945, this key position, the official who controlled such things as United Nations "Police Actions," was to be filled by a communist from some Eastern European Communist Country.

At the time of the Korean War, this post was filled by Constantine Zinchenko, of Russia. The North Koreans had Russian military advisors during the war, and it later became known just who was in charge of the North Korean War efforts. According to a Department of Defense press release dated May 15, 1964, high-ranking Russian military officers were actually on the scene in North Korea directing military operations. The release stated: "A North Korean Major identified two of these Russian 'Advisors' as General Vasilev and Colonel Dolgin. Vasilev, he said, was in charge of all movements across the 38th parallel. Another prisoner...said he actually heard General Vasilev give the order to attack on June 25th."(39)

General Vasilev's chain of command went through the U.N. as well. He, "...had been the chairman of the U.N. Military Staff Committee which, along with the office of the Undersecretary General for Political and Security Council Affairs, is responsible for U.N. military action under the Security Council." (40) That meant two Russians shared authority in planning the North Korean war efforts, and one of them planned the efforts of the United Nations. "In effect, The Communists were directing both sides of the war!" (41)

The Russians were not only controlling both sides of the war and supplying technical advisors for the North Korean war effort, they were actually supplying Russian pilots for flights against the Americans: "Lt. Gen. Samuel E. Anderson, commander of the Fifth Air Force, revealed that entire Soviet Air force units fought in the Korean War for over two and a half years..." (42)

General MacArthur, aware that the Red Chinese were about to enter the war, realized that one way to prevent their massive entry was to bomb the bridges crossing the Yalu River. He: "...ordered General Stratemeyer, {Chief of the air Force} to employ B-29's on the following morning to destroy the Yalu bridges and cut this easy line of communication between Manchuria and North Korea. An immediate dispatch came from Secretary {of State George} Marshall countermanding my order and directing me to 'postpone all bombing of targets within five miles of the Manchurian border.'" (43)

In addition, MacArthur was ordered not to pursue aircraft fleeing North Korea into Manchuria, nor could he bomb the supply base in the town of Racin. MacArthur felt that of these decisions the: "...most incomprehensible of all was the refusal to let me bomb the important supply center at Racin. Which was not in Manchuria or Siberia {Russia} but many miles from the borders, in northeast Korea. Racin was a depot to which the Soviet Union forwarded supplies from Vladivostok for the North Korean Army." (44)

On November 25, 1950, the Red Chinese Army commander, General Lin Piao, launched his full forces across the Yalu River and into North Korea. MacArthur felt: "...information must have been relayed to them, assuring that the Yalu bridges would continue to enjoy sanctuary and that their bases would be left intact." (45) This was, unfortunately, the truth, as even General Lin Piao later admitted that he: "...would never have made the attack and risked my men ...if I had not been assured that Washington would restrain General MacArthur from taking adequate retaliatory measures against my lines of supply and communication." (46)

General MacArthur would later write that the order not to bomb the Yalu bridges: "...was the most indefensible and ill-conceived decision ever forced on a field commander in our nation's history."(47)

One of General MacArthur's generals in the Air Force, George Stratemeyer, said: "We had sufficient air, bombardment, fighters, reconnaissance so that I could have taken out all of those supplies, those airdromes on the other side of the Yalu; I could have bombed the devils between there and Mukden, stopped the railroad operating and the people of China that were fighting could not have been supplied...But we weren't permitted to do it. As a result, a lot of American blood was spilled over there in Korea." (48)

House Minority Leader Joseph Martin also expressed his dismay at the administration's apparent desire not to win the war in Korea by such tactics as not allowing the bombing of strategic military targets: "If we are not in Korea to win, this Administration should be indicted for the Murder of Thousands of American Boys." (49)

(f) The Viet Nam War 1954-73 with 58,151 American deaths and a total of 211,324 casualties. War in Vietnam. U.S. military advisers had been in South Vietnam for a decade {10 years}; They were first sent to Vietnam by then Jewish President Eisenhower, and their numbers were increased as military positions of the Siagon Government became weaker.

After the attacks on U.S. destroyers in the Tonkin Gulf, President Johnson asked for a resolution expressing U.S. determination to support freedom and protect peace in Southeast Asia. Congress responded with the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, expressing support for "all necessary measures" the President might take to repeal armed attack against U.S. forces and prevent further aggression. Following this resolution, and following a Communist attack on a U.S. installation in Central Vietnam, the U.S. escalated its participation in the war.

Elected in 1968, Richard Nixon continued the Johnson strategy of restrictions and frustrations to our military: It's alright to kill a Communist Only after he has Killed American Soldiers, in some other part of the world, but here inside the United States, due to rulings from anti-American Federal Judges, we must not only coddle these traitors but we must hire them in the Federal Government, and in our Schools, thanks to the Communist Prostitutes in our Federal Courts!

And by confining the bulk of the fighting to South Vietnam, this insured that maximum damage would be inflicted on our ally; while at the same time our military leaders were restricted from attacking certain strategic targets in North Vietnam which would have forced the enemy to surrender. Further our soldiers, were not allowed to fire upon the enemy unless first being fired upon, Thus insuring the maximum in Casualties on our American Military Men. Then Henry Kissinger {Jew} started the long "negotiating" process with the North Vietnam and Red China, while our sons, brothers and dads died in Vietnam jungles; Killed with weapons bought and paid for by our income tax money! Kissinger leisurely wined and dined with his Communist friends, while President Nixon "wound down" the war by surrendering billions in our most sophisticated war equipment to the enemy.

Perhaps the most extraordinary example of America's military assistance to the Russian Government occurred during the Vietnamese war. Dr. Sutton has concluded that; "...The guns, the ammunition, the weapons, the transportation systems, that killed Americans in Vietnam came from the American subsidized economy of the Soviet Union."(50) In fact, It has been estimated that 45 cents of every dollar American Taxpayers paid in income tax during the Vietnamese War went to the Soviet Union and North Vietnam to finance the war against American Troops!

America's assistance to the cause of the North Vietnamese Government had an early beginning. In an article entitled "When Ho Chi Minh was an Intelligence Agent for the U.S.," author Lloyd Shearer details how the American Government assisted the early efforts of the founder of the revolution against the South Vietnamese Government. Ho Chi Minh was recruited into the American intelligence apparatus. The article states: "We had a trusted agent whom we regularly supplied with weapons, radio equipment, operators and medicine. All of it served to reinforce his position and status." (51) So even before the Vietnamese war started, traitors in the American Government were supplying the guerilla army of the man who would ultimately lead the Viet Cong in a war against America. The American people, who were beginning to sense that something was wrong with the conduct of America's efforts in the war, started showing that concern at the polls. The aid and trade being sent to Russia during the war became a campaign issue in the 1968 Presidential campaign. How was all this possible? Let's examine it from a Jew who renounced Judaism and became a true Christian and spent his life warning America about the evils of Judaism.

horizontal rule

1. By Michael A. Hoffman II.

2. Hampshire Gazette, October 25, 1786.

3. The Rise of American Civilization, by Charles A. and Mary R. Beard; They Were White and They Were Slaves, by Michael A. Hoffmann II.

4. The Ballad of Daniel Shays, by Michael Paulin.

5. The History of the Insurrections in Massachusetts, by George R. Minot.

6. The Embattled Farmers: The Massachusetts Countryside in the American Revolution, by Lee Newcomer.

7. Beard, The Embattled Farmers: The Massachusetts Countryside in the American Revolution, by Lee Newcomer.

8. Connecticut Courant, November 20, 1786.

9. Acts and Laws of Massachusetts, 1786.

10. Letter of Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, January 30, 1787.

11. From the Independent History and Research newsletter, which has since evolved into Revisionist History Magazine, Independent History, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816.

12. Bismarck, 1876.

13. U.S. Congressional Record, June 26, 1939, Hon. Jacob Thorkelson of Montana, "Shall Constitutional Government Prevail?"

14. The International Jew, Vol. IV (1922), pp. 171, 173.

15. Mackenzie in his historical research entitled, The Nineteenth Century.

16. Rabbi Reichorn, in Le Contemporain, July 1st, 1880.

17. La Vieille France, No. 216, March, 1921.

18. by Benjamin Franklin, who was one of the six founding fathers designated to draw up The Declaration of Independence. He spoke before the Constitutional Congress in May 1787, and asked that Jews be barred from immigrating to America. The above are his exact words as quoted from the diary of General Charles Pickney of Charleston, S.C.

19. The Judisk Tidskrift, No. 6, Aug.-Sept., 1929, written by Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden.

20. Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn.

21. And Men Wept, by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin, pp. 82-83.

22. Statement by Rabbi Felix Mendelsohn, Chicago Sentinel, October 8, 1942.

23. Jewish professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937.

24. Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York City.

25. The American Hebrew, July 24, 1942.

26. William Joyce's [Lord Ha Ha] last words just before Britain executed him for anti-war activism in WW II.

27. American Opinion, December, 1980, p. 35.

28. Tragedy and Hope, by Caroll Quigley, p. 972.

29. The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, by Frazier Hunt, p. 447.

30. Reminiscences, Douglas MacArthur, pp. 373-374.

31. What's Wrong With the United Nations, by Reed Benson and Robert Lee, in Review of the News, September 9, 1970, p. 9.

32. American Opinion, December, 1980, p. 36.

33. The Fearful Master, by G. Edward Griffin, p. 174.

34. The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, by Frazier Hunt, p. 459.

35. Reminiscence, p. 408.

36. The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, p. 459.

37. The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, p. 459.

38. The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, p. 459.

39. The Fearful Master, p. 176.

40. The Fearful Master, p. 176.

41. The Fearful Master, p. 177.

42. The Fearful Master, p. 172.

43. Reminiscences, p. 419.

44. Reminiscences, p. 415.

45. Reminiscences, p. 426.

46. Reminiscences, p. 426.

47. Reminiscences, p. 423.

48. The Forgotten War in Korea, by William P. Hoar, American Opinion, November, 1977, p. 18.

49. The Forgotten War in Korea, p. 18.

50. National Suicide, p. 46.

51. Parade, March 18, 1973, p. 15.

Continue on to Part 7

Return to Table of Contents

Return to Willie Martin's Bible Studies Index

horizontal rule