Scroll down for smoking gun evidence that will bring conviction
Wolfowitz and others in the Administration of mass murder and
treason as soon as the spreading news reaches the critical mass and
breaks through CFR-media censorship to overwhelming public
demand for justice and anti-globalist reform.
Wonder Woman wrote:
Subject: Re: Got 'em! 9-11 Frame-up smoking gun! Japanese videos air-to-air missile ...
Reply to WW:
its working. Can't you see it?
Remember that most of the people organized crime has working for
The U.S. Defense Department is covering a U.S. missile
fired in support of the WTC crashbombing frame-up operation.
Here is the smoking gun article again -- I suspect it will be
one of the most important posts you will see this morning,
First we saw video of a the dark blur of an object passing
Now the Japanese news agency has found someone elses
The only reason for a missile timed to hit the plane
Leave it to the Japanese -- the best photographers in the
Probably there was another missile fired to catch the first
Doubtless the plane that fired this air-to-air missile was
Not only does this prove the frame-up -- it also proves that
Mr. Wolfowitz, based on all of your actions since September 11
People of America have the proof they needed. There is no question now.
HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE AT THE WTC ON 9.11?
List members have written to share surprise at the low number of fatalities
in the 9.11 World Trade Center attack. Of the 3,000 plus who died, some 500
were firefighters, police and plane passengers, which means that there were
some 2,500 people who died in buildings said to have office space for
List member Lowell Manning in New Zealand firstname.lastname@example.org has
learnt from information in Time magazine and the website
http://www.september11victims.com that 21 percent of the floor space is
listed as having been unoccupied; however, not on the impact zone floors.
Lowell concludes, It doesnt add up. A sinister explanation could be that
people in key parts of the building, including the impact area perhaps, were
absent that day. Thats why I think it is important to draw maps of who was
there, who was absent, who became victims and who survived. Let the numbers
tell the story. A good start can be made by getting employee lists and
checking them against the victim list, which contains the names and ages of
the victims and where they lived.
List member Dick Eastman shares the e-mail of a correspondent who asks
pertinently, assuming that thousands of people did not turn up for work that
day, Why haven't any of the survivors or rescue workers told us about the
fact that they were tipped off before hand? I don't mean accidentally
mentioning it, but actually trying to get the word out. Many of these
people knew people who were killed, and they have the internet to get the
message out, and yet silence. I think this is important because if every
single one of these thousands of people are willingly going along with the
cover-up, then I'm not sure what that means.
Limited hang-out spin to protect Wolfowitz,
care of CNN.:
Memo To: Wolf Blitzer, CNN Late Edition
From: Jude Wanniski
Re: Paul Wolfowitz and Osama bin Laden
I watched with great interest your interview of Deputy Secretary of Defense
Paul Wolfowitz yesterday, one Wolf interrogating another. The reason I
picked you out for my Monday "Memo on the Margin," Wolf, rests entirely on
Dr. Wolfowitz's use of the adjective "friendly." My Monday memo almost
always keys off the Sunday talk shows, and I've many times honed in on one
of your guests, but never because of a single word. In this case the word
It had to do with the weekend revelation that in the defeat of the Taliban,
the Northern Alliance has come across a videotape that absolutely,
positively proves that Osama bin Laden knew IN ADVANCE of the Al Qaeda
attacks of September 11. You asked Wolfowitz about it and while he seemed to
say yes indeedy, it does all that, WE HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG THAT BIN LADEN
WAS IN ON THE PLANNING, and that the conclusive proof we had was passed on
to several FRIENDLY nations.
My point, Wolf, is that the Taliban asked us several times for evidence that
Bin Laden was involved in the 9-11 planning, saying that if we provided it,
they WOULD TURN HIM OVER TO US. What does this mean to you, Wolf? To me, it
means that we DID NOT WANT THE TALIBAN TO TURN BIN LADEN OVER TO US, or we
would have given them the conclusive proof that Wolfowitz says WE HAD ALL
ALONG, but only supplied to FRIENDLY nations.
Is there something wrong with my logic? Would it not have been neater and
cleaner to give the Taliban the evidence we gave to so many "friendly"
nations? They would have had to turn him over or have to admit to the
Islamic world that they were official supporters of criminal terrorism. As
it is, we have dropped a zillion pounds of bombs on Afghanistan, killed
countless men and women and children, on one side or the other, and we still
do not have Bin Laden in custody. On the face of it, the United States once
again has blundered, giving more reason for the extremists in the Islamic
world to say it is in their interests to commit suicide to make life
difficult for Americans.
Do you understand this message, Wolf? The Wolfowitz you interviewed said
that he knew before we fired a single shot in Afghanistan that Bin Laden was
GUILTY. I believe he was guilty, which is why I announced early on that I
supported any attempt to get him. But if it now turns out that we could have
gotten the bastard without having to bomb the bejesus out of one of the
poorest countries of the world, we could have given the UNFRIENDLY Taliban
the evidence and they would have turned him over to us. I am sickened by the
idea that we withheld that evidence because we really wanted to incinerate
Afghanistan. Or am I missing something? Are you missing something?
(end of excerpt from CNN transcript)
The US government proposed the use of unmanned drones four decades ago.