Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

 

 

 

White House Orders US Air Force to Stand Down

 

 

Having been personally intercepted by the US Air Force several times while flying civilian aircraft, I can guarandamntee you that the following is correct, in that it does NOT take a presidential order for such an intercept to occur.

 

What DOES take a presidential order is for the Air Force to stand down and NOT intercept a suspicious aircraft.

 

You might think that communications between two aircraft flying at several hundred miles per hour is difficult, but you can bet your bippy that you can very clearly see instructions from an F-16 pilot with bombs aboard who's flying on your left wing.  If he sticks out his thumb, and points down, you'd better land, pronto.

 

Once making the intercept, such a pilot would be in serious trouble if he failed to take action once he knew there was a problem on the aircraft, presidential order or not.  At that point, it would be his judgment about whether or not to shoot down an airliner full of civilians headed for the WTC, but can you even imagine the pilot who would fail to follow through?

 

It is absolutely true that the ONLY way the WTC and the Pentagon were bombed is because the White House WANTED them bombed.

 

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

To: "Strait Truth" <Strait_Truth@egroups.com

Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:11 AM

Subject: [CINDS] FW: [Fwd: AIR FORCE 9.11 STAND-DOWN ORDERS CAME FROM HIGHEST LEVEL o/t EXECUTIVE BRANCH]


 
 
  -------- Original Message --------
  Subject: AIR FORCE 9.11 STAND-DOWN ORDERS CAME FROM HIGHEST LEVEL o/t
EXECUTIVE
  BRANCH
  Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 20:08:45 -0700
  From: TOP_VIEW <top_view@planetmail.com
  Reply-To: TOP_VIEW@planetmail.com
  Organization: TOP_VIEW
  To: president@whitehouse.gov, apfn@apfn.org,
  editor@psyops.com,michael@burnrate.com, editor@fair.org,
  editor@truthout.com,lew@lewrockwell.com, editor@emperors-clothes.com,
  editor@nymag.com,editor@davidicke.com, editor@commondreams.org,
  joel@joelskousen,RAdams@davidicke.org, editor@conspiracyplanet.com,
  al@almartinraw.com,david@dbautocycleelec.freeserve.co.uk,
  onedeaddj@propagandamatrix.com,hal.turner@halturnershow.com, sitka@attbi.com,
  kosovonews@antiwar.com,macd@cuttingedge.org, rriffe@pickens.net,
  editor@indiatimes.com,counterpunch@counterpunch.org, fair@fair.org

  ALERT ALERT ALERT ALERT

  FORWARD AS FAR AND WIDE AS POSSIBLE


  ** TOP_VIEW **
  The Big Picture


  12.09.01
  AIR FORCE 9.11 STAND-DOWN ORDERS CAME FROM HIGHEST LEVEL o/t EXECUTIVE BRANCH



  Cheney, bush: the Air Force and Army would like a word with you.
  - - - - - - - -
  From: "Brian Downing Quig" <quig@dcia.com
  To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, top_view@planetmail.com,
  bushcoup2000@yahoogroups.co
  Subject: 911 ORDERS FROM THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH!!
  Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 18:35:23-0700

  This writer, who is identified only by top_view@planetmail.com, by
  example knows what he is talking about. He knows what Mike Ruppert and I
  knew immediately and some in this discussion are having a very hard time
  grasping.

  The Air Force spokesman confirmed that AFTER the alerts and requests for
  INTERCEPTS of the aircraft were received from FAA/ATC, orders from the
  HIGHEST LEVEL of the executive branch of the federal government were
  received, demanding that the Air Force stand down and NOT follow through
  with ESTABLISHED scramble/intercept procedures that morning until
  further notice!

  The writer is going from something he knows --- somewhere in the
  executive branch a STAND DOWN ORDER was issued --- to a pretty good
  guess of a probable culprit. The writer is 100% on the mark when he
  discribes Cheney's deliberate confusion about the INTERCEPT PROCEDURES.

  Cheney needs to explain why he lied about Bush having to make the
  decision to shoot down flight 77 on 9-11-01.

  I feel that this writer is moving the discussion in the right direction.

  Brian Quig

  CTRL@LISTSERV.AOL.COM

  http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html


  -  -  -  -
  AF Spokesman: FAA DID Alert IMMEDIATELY On 9.11

  ** TOP_VIEW **
  The Big Picture

  12.09.01
  AF Spokesman: FAA DID Alert IMMEDIATELY On 9.11; AF PREVENTED from scrambling!

  TOP_VIEW conducted a phone interview this morning (12.09.01) with a
  spokesperson for the U.S. Air Force, located in New York.

  This person was ordered to the Ground Zero, Pennsylvania and Pentagon
  9.11 crash sites within several days of the events, as part of an Air
  Force investigative probe.

  Much of the truly eye-opening information conveyed to us by this
  high-ranking officer will -- unfortunately -- have to wait until some
  future time until we can organize it into article form; a small
  percentage of the information simply cannot be made public at this time
  for reasons of PERSONAL --NOT "national" -- security.

  What we are focusing on right now is some crucial information related
  specifically to the entire matter of IF or WHEN FAA/ATC personnel
  alerted appropriate Air National Guard/Air Force units, that four large
  passenger jets were significantly off course and that all standard
  communications with these craft had been broken.

  We were informed that STANDARD procedures FULLY IN EFFECT on the morning
  of September 11 WERE ABSOLUTELY followed to a "T" by U.S. Air Traffic
  Control personnel; that via established channels and according to
  established guidelines, U.S. Air National Guard and Air Force units --
  which are ALWAYS on alert to be scrambled for intercepts of either
  distressed OR suspicious and possibly hostile aircraft 365/24/7 in these
  United States -- WERE DEFINITELY contacted by FAA/ATC on 9.11
  IMMEDIATELY after Air Traffic Control had become aware of the developing
  situation with the jets.

  The Air Force spokesman confirmed that AFTER the alerts and requests for
  INTERCEPTS of the aircraft were received from FAA/ATC, orders from the
  HIGHEST LEVEL of the executive branch of the federal government were
  received, demanding that the Air Force stand down and NOT follow through
  with ESTABLISHED scramble/intercept procedures that morning until
  further notice!

  The U.S. Air Force's hands (wings) were DELIBERATELY TIED on the morning
  of September 11, until such time that the HORRIFYING, TREACHEROUS,
  MURDEROUS DEEDS HAD BEEN CARRIED OUT by the BushMob.

  Our informant has told us in no uncertain terms that as much as SEVENTY
  PERCENT of Armed Forces officers -- with the NOTABLE exception of the
  U.S. Navy -- are VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED to the treacherous, murderous
  actions carried out by profoundly corrupt and demonic elements within
  the federal government on 9.11, and to the WHOLESALE TREACHERY and
  DEMOLITION of the U.S. Constitution which said elements have now undertaken.

  It was conveyed to us that the "story" is by no means over yet; that the
  fat lady has by NO means yet "sung", and that this large percentage of
  the military who DO support, uphold and defend the U.S. CONSTITUTION are
  NOT going let all this just "slide". They are simply waiting for the
  right time, to do all within their power to set things straight in the
  United States.

  Our source furthermore fully concurred with the assessment of ourselves
  and others: that a crucial element in the government being able to
  "SELL" to the public their utterly false fables about WHY 9.11 death
  planes were NOT intercepted by Air Guard/Air Force units has to do with
  a deliberate, major and blatant distortion and twisting of the truth by
  none OTHER than Herr Doktor Dick "Mengele/Angel of Death" Cheney himself
  (the satanist turd!); accomplished in the following manner.

  Cheney, while being interviewed by Tim Russert on NBC TV's 'MEET THE
  PRESS on September 16th, claimed that the military needed authorization
  from the president before scrambling fighter jets to intercept American
  Airlines Flight 77.

  THIS IS A BIG, BIG, LIE, plain and simple.

  For example: remember two years ago, when golf pro Payne Stewart's small
  PRIVATE Lear jet went off-course and out of communication just after
  takeoff in Florida?

  Within MINUTES, on an IMMEDIATE alert from the FAA, U.S. Air Force and
  Air Guard jets were SCRAMBLED to INTERCEPT Stewart's jet and see what
  the heck was up (not that it helped much in that case...): "Several Air
  Force and Air National Guard fighter jets, plus an AWACS radar control
  plane, helped the Federal Aviation Administration track the runaway
  Learjet and estimate when it would run out of fuel." --CNN, 10.26.99

  Interceptors were in direct proximity to Stewart's seriously messed-up
  aircraft within about TEN MINUTES of him having taken off. NOBODY had to
  go pull Clinton away from Vice-president Monica Lewinsky and get him to
  AUTHORIZE the INTERCEPT of Payne Stewart's jet that day. (NOT that Slick
  would have let go that wet cigar long enough to do so anyway...)

  Moreover, according to the same CNN article: "...officers on the Joint
  Chiefs were monitoring the Learjet on radar screens inside the
  Pentagon's National Military Command Center. -- CNN, 10.26.99

  Air Traffic Controllers request military intercepts of private and
  commercial planes REGULARLY. Sometimes it's because communications have
  broken off; sometimes it's to inform a pilot that his plane has gone off
  course; other times it's to observe the situation directly - for
  instance, to see who's actually flying the plane and things like that.
  None of this requires presidential approval.

  But there's MORE to how Cheney twisted the truth here regarding what is
  PROVABLY one of the BIGGEST holes in the FedGov's 9.11 tapestry of lies;
  since someone of even the most MINIMAL intelligence would realize that
  such intercepts are VERY common, do NOT require any "presidential
  authorization" and SHOULD HAVE TAKEN PLACE on September 11.

  So what arch-spin-meister Mengele Cheney DID was to very subtly and
  cleverly FUDGE the distinction between a common, often-executed
  INTERCEPT and a SHOOT-DOWN of an aircraft already determined to be hostile.

  Cheney put the entire situation in the context that there was a terribly
  troubling, agonizing ethical decision to be made whether or not to SHOOT
  DOWN a number of passenger aircraft which "seemed" to be hostile, and
  that only the president (who WAS after all (don't forget) VERY busy
  reading rabbit stories to Florida schoolkids at the time!) could have
  authorized this shoot-down.

  Well. FIRST of all, there was no NEED for any order to SHOOT DOWN; there
  was ONLY a need for Air Force/Air Guard units -- which are ALWAYS
  standing by to respond to FAA alerts about troubled and/or suspicious
  aircraft -- to carry out STANDARD INTERCEPT PROCEDURES.

  And keep in mind that military interceptors (or 'escorts') already have
  clear "instructions to act." These instructions can be read online in
  detailed manuals from the FAA and the Department of Defense. The
  instructions cover everything from minor emergencies to hijackings. If a
  problem is definitely serious, high-ranking military officers from the
  NMCC (National Military Command Center) in the Pentagon can take charge.

  So: even IF such intercepts had yielded information showing that the
  aircraft were INDEED hijacked, were under hostile control and about to
  be used as guided missiles/fuel-air bombs, there is still, according to
  our Air Force contact, NO REQUIREMENT that any order to shoot down
  hostile aircraft must come from the president himself. There ARE,
  according to our FULLY-knowledgeable Air Force contact, procedures are
  fully in place for NMCC commanding officers and the DOD to order such
  shoot-downs, when it's obvious an attack of some kind is underway. After
  all, the "commander-in-chief" might be too busy reading about rabbits to
  schoolkids to be bothered making such decisions about shooting down
  hostile aircraft!

  That Satanist swine Cheney knows this probably better than ANYONE --
  except for those military officers and personnel who DIRECTLY SAT ON by
  the Executive Branch on the morning of 9.11, until it was FAR TOO LATE
  to take any preventive actions whatsoever. Moreover, when jets were
  finally scrambled, they were DELIBERATELY scrambled from more distant
  bases from which it was a FOREGONE CERTAINTY the interceptors would
  NEVER be able to reach the hijacked planes in time.

  As an example of the blatantly false/disinformative statements made by
  Cheney (ONCE AGAIN!) to give some credibility to this
  highly-manipulated, non-timely "response" scenario, Mengele claimed that
  there were NO intercept aircraft ready for action at Andrew Air Force
  Base -- only TEN MILES from the Pentagon -- on the morning of 9.11. This
  has been proven to be a TOTAL LIE.

  (For a map of Washington showing the distance from Andrews Air Force
  base to the Pentagon go to:
  http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/andrewsmap.htm)


  BEYOND ANY DOUBT: the Executive branch of the federal government --
  whether g. w. bush or more likely Herr doktor Dick Mengele Cheney
  himself -- EXPRESSLY AND UNILATERALLY FORBADE Air Guard/Air Force units
  from responding in a TIMELY manner to FAA alerts on the morning of
  September 11, as they were fully ready to do.

  This is the truth, and large numbers of Air Force and other military
  personnel KNOW it, beyond the shadow of a doubt.

  And no doubt THAT explains exactly WHY Mengele Cheney has been in HIDING
  for so much of the past there months!!!!!

  - - - -
  Here's a transcript of the MEET THE PRESS segment where Cheney gets
  going muddying the waters about intercepts, shootdowns, time frames,
  (non-existent) moral considerations that supposedly delayed a response
  even more, and other chaff to deflect truth-seeking radar. Following
  that is a very worthwhile analysis of Cheney's verbal/conceptual
  gymnastics from:
  www.emporers-clothes.com/


  "MR. RUSSERT: What's the most important decision you think he made
  during the course of the day?

  "VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, the--I suppose the toughest decision was this
  question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft.

  "MR. RUSSERT: And you decided?

  "VICE PRES. CHENEY: We decided to do it. We'd, in effect, put a flying
  combat air patrol up over the city; F-16s with an AWACS, which is an
  airborne radar system, and tanker support so they could stay up a long time...

  "It doesn't do any good to put up a combat air patrol if you don't give
  them instructions to act, if, in fact, they feel it's appropriate.

  "MR. RUSSERT: So if the United States government became aware that a
  hijacked commercial airline was destined for the White House or the
  Capitol, we would take the plane down?

  "VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yes. The president made the decision...that if the
  plane would not divert...as a last resort, our pilots were authorized to
  take them out. Now, people say, you know, that's a horrendous decision
  to make. Well, it is. You've got an airplane full of American citizens,
  civilians, captured by...terrorists, headed and are you going to, in
  fact, shoot it down, obviously, and kill all those Americans on board?

  "...It's a presidential-level decision, and the president made, I think,
  exactly the right call in this case, to say, "I wished we'd had combat
  air patrol up over New York."
  --NBC, 'Meet the Press' 16 September 2001 (1)

  * * *
  FROM: http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm

  Note that Mr. Cheney has performed a sleight of hand here.

  First he said, "the toughest decision was...whether we would intercept
  incoming commercial aircraft."

  Later he said, "The president made the decision... that if the plane
  would not divert as a last resort, our pilots were authorized to take
  them out..." that is, "shoot it down."

  But "intercept": and "shoot it down" DO NOT mean the same thing.

  "intercept (nter-spt1) verb, transitive  intercepted, intercepting,
  intercepts 1. a. To stop, deflect, or interrupt the progress or intended
  course of"  (From 'American Heritage Dictionary')

  "shootdown (sht1doun) noun
  "Destruction of a flying aircraft by a missile attack or gunfire."
  (From 'American Heritage Dictionary')

  Mr. Cheney deliberately confused these terms to stop people from asking:
  why weren't the hijacked jets intercepted?

  Since "stopping, deflecting, or interrupting the progress or intended
  course of" a hijacked airplane does not necessarily involve violence,
  there could be no moral obstacle to scrambling fighter jets to intercept
  Flight 77. Therefore Mr. Cheney shifted quickly to the morally charged
  question of whether to shoot down "an airplane full of American
  citizens". By creating this emotional link between interception (not
  necessarily violent) and shooting down a commercial jet (very violent),
  Cheney hoped to create sympathy for a President forced to make this
  "horrendous" choice: to intercept or not to intercept.



  When dealing with potentially hostile situations, escorts can adopt
  aggressive behavior:
  "Small Private Plane Ordered to Land in Vicinity of Bush Ranch "A small
  private plane flying unauthorized in the vicinity of President Bush's
  ranch near Crawford was ordered by the military to land Thursday, a
  sheriff's deputy said....

  "The Federal Aviation Administration declared that the plane was
  unauthorized and ordered its occupants detained, Plemons said. At that
  point military officials, flying in two jets beside the plane, got on
  the pilot's radio frequency and ordered the Cessna to land...

  "The plane landed on a private landing strip near State Highway 6, about
  eight miles from the Bush ranch near Crawford....

  "In [a second incident, in] Wood County, Sheriff's senior Dispatcher
  Rodney Mize said a private plane was forced down by two military pilots
  in A-10 Warthog jets about 11:30 a.m. The jets flew one above and one
  below until the private plane's pilot landed at Wisener Field near
  Mineola." --'AP,' 13 September 2001 (12)

  The 'Boston Globe' reported that:
  "[Marine Corps Major Mike] Snyder, the NORAD spokesman, said its
  fighters routinely intercept aircraft.

  "When planes are intercepted, they typically are handled with a
  graduated response. The approaching fighter may rock its wingtips to
  attract the pilot's attention, or make a pass in front of the aircraft.
  Eventually, it can fire tracer rounds in the airplane's path, or, under
  certain circumstances, down it with a missile." --'Boston Globe,' 15
  September 2001 (13)

  Now, let us return to Mr. Cheney and his interview on 'MEET THE PRESS.'

  As you will recall, he said:
  "It doesn't do any good to put up a combat air patrol if you don't give
  them instructions to act, if, in fact, they feel it's appropriate."

  Mr. Cheney is attempting to misinform by pretending that intercept
  pilots need 'instructions' from the President, when he knows perfectly
  well that clear instructions and a whole organizational network exist to
  handle intercept emergencies.

  Moreover, Mr. Cheney's implicit argument - that there is no point in
  sending up an escort unless the pilot has clearance to shoot down a
  commercial jet - is absurd. Why would such a decision have to be made in
  advance of scrambling the escort? Even if an airliner has been taken
  over by a terrorist with a suicide mission, how could Mr. Cheney, Mr.
  Bush or anyone else other than God Himself possibly predict how the
  hijacker would respond to an intercept by military jets? Even if a
  hijacker were ready to die for the glory of crashing into the Pentagon,
  does that mean he would also be ready to die for the glory of ignoring a
  military pilot's order to land?

  So even if the military had no authority to shoot down Flight 77, why
  not send up escorts planes? Isn't that in fact how police and the
  military routinely handle hijack situations - by mobilizing a
  potentially overwhelming force in the hope of getting the hijacker to
surrender?

  Why, as Mr. Cheney claims, would there have been "no point" in trying
  this tactic in the case of Flight 77? Weren't many human lives at stake?
  Isn't that "a point"?
 

 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party