Yahoo, whose entire business model relies HEAVILY on THEIR use of OUR internet, who depends on US to defend THEIR right to free speech, has now CENSORED CHRISTIAN SPEECH
To add your comments to this boycott, please join the forum
"Boycott Yahoosm" Officially began October 2, 2003 at 6:15 PM
In less than three years, Yahoo,'s stock plunged 96%, from $240 to $10 per share. We predict that within one year of this boycott, by October 2, 2003 at 6:15 PM, Yahoo's stock value will be down to less than $5 per share.
UPDATE: April 27, 2007, 12:24 PM PST
Yahoo, whose entire business model relies HEAVILY on THEIR use of OUR internet, has now banned numerous Christians from access to Yahoogroups based EXCLUSIVELY on whiiiiiiiiiiiining from jews, with NO legitimate reason whatsoever, with the following being just a few of the most glaring examples:
UPDATE: October 1, 2002
A search of Yahoogroups today revealed that there are 384 TIMES as many forums promoting sodomy than there are promoting fatherhood and 22 TIMES as many with the word "fathers" in their titles. Compared to forums discussing Jesus, there are almost as many forums promoting paganism and three times as many promoting sodomy.
Upadate June 19, 2007
As a direct result of an evil Yahoo corporate policy, the picture has gotten even worse over the last five years. Yet Yahoo is a corporation whose entire existence depends upon OUR willingness to permit them to use OUR internet, free of censorship:
We were one of the first to support Yahoo, even adding a link to their search engine to our WWW pages.
But Yahoo has now overstepped its bounds by censoring political speech, shutting down all constructive discussions on Yahoogroups which they unilaterally deemed to be politically incorrect, and cancelling email accounts of those American citizens who were courageous enough to stand up for the White, Caucasian, or Israelite Race.
Yahoo also refused to live by its own terms of service, the very one which they used as the excuse to practice political censorship. They used every excuse under the sun to censor every person whose political views conflicted with theirs, while they held themselves to be above the law.
This hypocritical corporation deserves our uttermost contempt, not the protection of US law and custom. While they expect to receive all the benefits of US citizenship as they engage in this amoral, unconstitutional, and unlawful censorship of political speech, what they really deserve is to feel the wrath of a successful boycott which puts them out of business and perhaps even drives the enemy foreign agents who gain by such censorship out of the country.
It's time for them to go!
Do boycotts work? Since our boycott of HP officially began Sunday, August 6, 2000 at 11:12 AM, the value of HP stock plunged by as much as 95%.
With God's help, Yahoo!'s stock will plunge 98% before October 2, 2004, at 6:15 PM!!!
PRISON!: Yahoo's Dirty Secret, Hidden Behind Net Neutrality
You've undoubtedly heard a lot lately about efforts by Moveon.org to regulate the internet, but have you looked at who is behind these efforts?
Yahoo is bankrolling the Network Neutrality Coalition in hopes that you won't learn about their other high-profile activity - helping to lock-up Chinese dissidents. We question what Yahoo and Moveon.org's real definition of "network neutrality" is.
The Chinese may love American jeans, entertainment, and free speech, but they do not have equal access to these by-products.
According to documents recently obtained by "Human Rights in China," Yahoo helped lock up a Chinese citizen for calling China "an authoritarian dictatorship" (it is) and advocating that "without a multi-party system, free elections and separation of powers, any political reform is fraudulent" (that's true).
Reporters Without Borders recently visited Yahoo's corporate campus to show its employees the real affect of cooperating with the Chinese government and locking up dissidents.
In one video, a jailed dissident's brother pleads, "Li is in prison because of [Yahoo]," he says. "Our family is broken ...I am convinced he is innocent...All this happened because of your company...and I hope that in future you will heed your conscience before doing this kind of thing."
In another video, another jailed dissident's lawyer says Yahoo! is implicated in many similar cases: "I have names, but I cannot reveal them yet..." See the videos on ABC World News Tonight here.
The fact is, this is not the first time that Yahoo has worked hand-in-glove to jail Chinese dissidents. The San Francisco Chronicle (4/29/06) writes "...other cases in which Yahoo was cited as providing evidence to the Chinese government include Jiang Lijun, serving a four-year prison sentence for discussing a democratic China; journalist Shi Tao, arrested for forwarding a government e-mail and now serving a 10-year sentence; and Li Zhi, serving an eight-year sentence for criticizing local officials online."
We may now only see the tip of the iceberg. Reporters Without Borders claims to have sent Yahoo a list of the 80 cyber-dissidents and journalists in prison in China, asking it to confirm if it was involved in their arrests. Three months later, Yahoo still hasn't replied.
What can you do to send Yahoo a message?
From: CM Boisvert
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: Yahoo have again banned me from all the groups
On Saterday, two weeks ago, I found that 80 groups (including ALL of my OWN) were missing under my primary ID. My addy under that ID still existed, but on Monday EVERYTHING, including a 25 mb yahoo box connected to my generic server (SBC/Yahoo!) email, GONE. It no longer existed. Actually, it wasn't taking my password (so it was strictly a put-up job, since THAT addy had all folders filled with incriminatng NWO information) and I changed it. It still came up "invalid password." I called my ISP and they referred me to Yahoo! and the man I spoke to was very rude and said that I had violated "terms of Service" for groups. So they totally invalidated my entire ID and I am unable to get to my mailbox, that was also firstname.lastname@example.org . Yes, he simply repeated that I had violated "Terms of Service" for GROUPS. No sense there. Nonsense! I should have gotten at least TWO warnings before taking all my groups and my ID should not have closed down AT ALL! (Remember, this box had New World Order tell-all information & a very large address book!)
Now that's just the END of the story. Yes, the end. Because I will NEVER recover my primary yahoo ID!
I had to open a new SBC server email box for outgoing from my computer that is still not much good as it is tied to Yahoo! also, and I don't pay my own phone/internet bill, so I can't change servers, as it has to stay on one bill.
Barely two months before (the REAL reason I was pulled)
my yahoo boxes became useless for "reply"
(this is on a 'reply;' do you see your message below? No!)
or "forward" because it leaves off the message by never changing over the screen completely; a typical NWO, illegal US government monopoly company ploy of hackers through SBC/Yahoo!
Yahoo! addies I have left are now only good for passports to groups and I am trying to open new memberships to some of the groups I lost. My new addies for groups email are with http://www.mail2world.com and the "Cc" field is showing the corresponding addy for this one. If you must, please use THAT one.
There are two ways to view this boycott. One view is that membership to Yahoo is a privilege which can be removed if Yahoo unilaterally determines that a post, or a poster, or a group, is "insensitive", politically incorrect, or for any other reason which they don't have to advise that member about. You can't even use the user names "fathersmanifesto" or "Christianparty" or "Christian" because Yahoo has restricted these names without so much as a whimper about why.
The other view is that Yahoo is a company whose lifeblood depends on its ability to utilize and even control to some extent the PUBLIC infrastructure known as the internet, and therefore is prohibited under the First Amendment from restricting free speech.
In this boycott, it makes no difference which view the courts take because what the American public thinks about an internet based company which uses that privilege to restrict free speech will reign supreme.
NOBODY likes the notion of censoring political speech, yet that's EXACTLY the mud puddle Yahoo stepped in.
Personally, my view is that a US corporation which uses OUR internet that WE paid for as a tool for censorship should be banned from use of the internet in perpetuity, regardless of their excuse. They have a right to censor each other, but they don't have the right to use OUR internet to do it. In Yahoo's case, they've REFUSED to censor the vilest sodomite, pedophile, pornographic anti-American groups, while engaging in the most egregious censorship of every Christian from Willie Martin to Steve Voss.
This is EXACTLY why we have the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Yahoo cannot win.
With each new post, another American citizens who was censored by Yahoo pops up, and with each such revelation, Yahoo's stock value diminishes. It's a simple formula, and an effective strategy.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Molokai Advertiser-News (aka The MAN) George Peabody" <email@example.com>
To: "Christianparty" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:53 PM
Subject: Yahoo prevents attached PDF from delivery for MAN website?
> Dear John: could Yahoo be responsible for the "dissappearance" of PDF's
--- In email@example.com, scott michaels <scott_24002@y...> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:09 PM
Subject: failure delivery
> Message from yahoo.com.
HOW YAHOO CENSORS FREE SPEECH BY PROVIDING "FREE" EMAIL
There are 40 THOUSAND emails in my Yahoo account, the vast majority being spam, viagra ads, and other pornography. It's now IMPOSSIBLE to sort through all of this to try to locate emails from friends, or that I'm expecting, and even from every single email forum I've ever signed up for.
After years of trying to get Yahoo to explain how this happens, and spending hours sorting through their STUPID "intelligent knowledgebase" I finally complained to my isp, who advised that my non-Yahoo messages were going OUT, but were not being RECEIVED by either Yahoo or my Yahoo account. I thus set up numerous email accounts on other servers to see which email would be received by my Yahoo account, and which would be rejected.
They were ALL rejected!
The ONLY messages which were received were from other Yahoo accounts. List serve messages were rejected. Usenet messages were rejected. Forum messages were rejected.
And I NEVER received a single indication from Yahoo that there was ever a problem with my email, even though many of the return messages advised the sender that I don't even have a Yahoo account with that name.
THIS CANNOT BE AN ACCIDENT. Computers DO NOT work this way. Only mischievous human beings [read: jews] act this way.
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtpout03-03.mesa1.secureserver.net
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtpout05-03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net.
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtpout03-03.mesa1.secureserver.net.
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
The original message was received at Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:00:08 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----". The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----". The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail administrator or Postmaster at that destination. --AOL Postmaster ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <firstname.lastname@example.org> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mx1.mail.yahoo.com.: >>> DATA <<< 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (email@example.com) [-5] - mta186.mail.mud.yahoo.com 554 <firstname.lastname@example.org>... Service unavailable
Final-Recipient: RFC822; email@example.com Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.mail.yahoo.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (firstname.lastname@example.org) [-5] - mta186.mail.mud.yahoo.com Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:00:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from email@example.com by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id r.b.13864868 (22683) for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:00:08 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: <email@example.com> Received: from mblkn-m05 (mblkn-m05.mblk.aol.com [22.214.171.124]) by air-in04.mx.aol.com (v108.32) with ESMTP id MAILININ44-589b43bc4568322; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:00:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:00:07 -0500 From: firstname.lastname@example.org Message-Id: <8C7DF915C0B6913-7B0-D7AF@mblkn-m05.sysops.aol.com> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User Received: from 126.96.36.199 by mblkn-m05.sysops.aol.com (188.8.131.52) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:00:07 -0500 X-Mailer: Netscape WebMail 15106 Subject: zaba 2:-- pm Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MailBlocks_8C7DF915C0B6913_7B0_911E_mblkn-m05.sysops.aol.com" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: email@example.com X-AOL-IP: 184.108.40.206 X-Spam-Flag: NO
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtpout02-03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net.