And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 1 Corinthians 15:45



Deu 32:8 When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.

Deu 32:8 When the most High5945 divided5157 to the nations1471 their inheritance, when he separated6504 the sons1121 of Adam,120 he set5324 the bounds1367 of the people5971 according to the number4557 of the children1121 of Israel.3478


Jer 31:27 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast.

Jer 31:27 Behold,2009 the days3117 come,935 saith5002 the LORD,3068 that I will sow2232 (853) the house1004 of Israel3478 and the house1004 of Judah3063 with the seed2233 of man,120 and with the seed2233 of beast.929

Jer 31:27 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of Adam, and with the seed of Ish.

Note that the Hebrew word "sheniy" [#8145], which means "other", is not in either of the above verses.   Just as "sheniy" appears in the following verse, if Israelites actually considered themselves to be "sons of Adam or "seed of man ", they would have written "with the other [sheniy] seed of Adam" :

Gen 4:19 And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah.

Gen 4:19 And Lamech3929 took3947 unto him two8147 wives:802 the name8034 of the one259 was Adah,5711 and the name8034 of the other8145 Zillah.6741

Because "sheniy" is conspicuously absent from both verses, there can be no doubt that Israelites can't consider themselves to be Adamites.


Deuteronomy 20:17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them; [namely], the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:

Ezra 9:1  Now when these things were done, the princes came to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests, and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands, doing according to their abominations, even of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites.

Numbers 25:17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:

Numbers 25:18 For they vex you with their wiles, wherewith they have beguiled you in the matter of Peor, and in the matter of Cozbi, the daughter of a prince of Midian, their sister, which was slain in the day of the plague for Peor's sake.


The LORD offered David 3 choices as punishment for numbering the sons of Israel:

1Ch 21:12 Either three years' famine; or three months to be destroyed before thy foes, while that the sword of thine enemies overtaketh thee; or else three days the sword of the LORD, even the pestilence, in the land, and the angel of the LORD destroying throughout all the coasts of Israel. Now therefore advise thyself what word I shall bring again to him that sent me.

1Ch 21:13 And David said unto Gad, I am in a great strait: let me fall now into the hand of the LORD; for very great are his mercies: but let me not fall into the hand of man [Adam, #120].

By saying "let me fall now into the hand of the LORD" David accepted "three days of the sword of the LORD".   He rejected "three years of famine" and "three months to be destroyed before thy foes" by saying "let me not fall into the hand of Adam".  Is it Adam who would would have caused the famine?  No.  It's Adam who were "thy foes" who would have had three months to destroy Israel.   The LORD then sent a plague upon Israel and seventy thousand men fell.


The 12th chapter of 1 Corinthians compares opposites to opposites:  corruption vs. incorruption, dishonor vs. glory, weakness vs. power, etc.  But you cannot understand how "natural" could be considered to be the opposite of "spiritual" until you realize from Paul's allegory in Galatians 4 that "natural body" is Ishmaelites [and allegorically all non-Israelites] and "spiritual body" is Israelites:

1Co 15:44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.

The Greek word "psuchikos" [#5591] from which "natural" man is translated is also defined as "bestial" man:

From G5590; sensitive that is, animate (in distinction on the one hand from G4152, which is the higher or renovated nature; and on the other from G5446, which is the lower or bestial nature): - natural, sensual.

Thus Paul is making a comparison between the bestial Adam created in Genesis 1:27 and the living soul Adam formed in Genesis 2:7, which are two very different accounts:


  1. God in the flesh.
  2. Son of God.
  3. Son of man.
  4. Son of Adam.
  5. King.
  6. Messiah.
  7. Pure Israelite sacrifice to God.
  8. Last Adam.

Those who believe Jesus is God in the flesh must believe that He "created" Adam120 in Genesis 1:27 or "formed" Adam121 in Genesis 2:7, ruling out Jesus as the "last Adam" as that would require them to believe that God created Himself.  Those who believe Jesus was the Son of God cannot also maintain that Jesus was the "second Adam" because that would require them to believe that the only son of God was made into [read: ginomai] a quickening spirit.  Had this been a reference to Jesus being "born" as a quickening spirit, the Greek word "gennao" [#1080] would have been used as it was in Matthew 1:16:

Mat 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

This is the only verse in the entire Holy Bible which judeochristians can point to and claim that Jesus was the "last Adam", a concept missing from every book of the Old Testament and all other books of the New Testament.  Furthermore, as an Israelite, it would be an insult to Him to refer to Him as an Adamite, son of Adam, or son of man.

The Iranians and Afghans claim to be Aryans. Our own dictionaries say that they're Aryans. Even Webster has the following definition for Aryans:

"3 : of or relating to Indo-Iranian or its speakers"

Aryans are "white". They're even "whiter" than us. I lived there 13 months and was shocked to see how Iranians have been protrayed in our jewsmedia as muds [but what else should we expect from the jews?].

They're Adamites. And it's clear as daylight to me that they're not Israelites. Even though they're "white", they're so radically different from us racially, intellectually, culturally, and in so many other ways, that I've never believed that we could possibly have a common ancestor.

Before Iran, I lived in Germany for 9 years and was surprised at how so many Americans accept the notion that Germans are Aryans. I never met a single German who ever made such a ludicrous statement. Germans know who the Aryans are. So why don't we?

There ARE some similarities in the language, but that's where the similarities end. The word "German" is the Assyrian word for "Judah", which makes sense as a small part of the Tribe of Judah was taken captive by the Assyrians [search the internet for Behistun Rock in Iran to see just how proud King Darius was to have captured them]. The Assyrians were Adamites too, but they were certainly nothing like the Israelites.

The Egyptians were Adamites. And they were so different racially from the Israelites that even after 4 centuries of captivity in Egypt, Moses was able to identify each Israelite man over the age of 20 by pedigree, family, and tribe. The offspring of any Israelites who married Egyptians were the mixed multitude who didn't survive the 40 year trek across the desert. And all of the following races were Adamites:

Deuteronomy 20:16 But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee [for] an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:

Deuteronomy 20:17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them; [namely], the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:

There's speculation that Canaan was a descendant of one of Noah's wives who was a descendant of Cain, in which event he would not be a pure Adamite--but he would still be a descendant of Adam [and it's not clear how someone could be a pure descendant of Adam, anyway]. If there's a single verse which claims that these other races above were not Adamites, I'd sure like to see it.

People claim that it was ok for Israelites to marry Midianites, who were also Adamites. But look at how many verses command the Israelites to totally destroy them:

Num 25:17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:
Num 31:3 And Moses spake unto the people, saying, Arm some of yourselves unto the war, and let them go against the Midianites, and avenge the LORD of Midian.
Num 31:7 And they warred against the Midianites, as the LORD commanded Moses; and they slew all the males.
Jdg 6:3 And [so] it was, when Israel had sown, that the Midianites came up, and the Amalekites, and the children of the east, even they came up against them;
Jdg 6:14 And the LORD looked upon him, and said, Go in this thy might, and thou shalt save Israel from the hand of the Midianites: have not I sent thee?
Jdg 6:16 And the LORD said unto him, Surely I will be with thee, and thou shalt smite the Midianites as one man.
Jdg 7:23 And the men of Israel gathered themselves together out of Naphtali, and out of Asher, and out of all Manasseh, and pursued after the Midianites.
Jdg 7:24 And Gideon sent messengers throughout all mount Ephraim, saying, Come down against the Midianites, and take before them the waters unto Bethbarah and Jordan. Then all the men of Ephraim gathered themselves together, and took the waters unto Bethbarah and Jordan.
Psa 83:9 Do unto them as [unto] the Midianites; as [to] Sisera, as [to] Jabin, at the brook of Kison:

Why did the LORD want the Midianites dead? Because they were Adamites.

Esau was an Adamite. But God hated Esau. Ishmael was an Adamite. But God excluded him and his descendants from His everlasting covenant. Lot was an Adamite. But God cut him out of the everlasting covenant. Moabites and Ammonites were Adamites. But God specifically prohibited them from even being in the territory:

An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD forever: Deuteronomy 23:3

If you can find a verse which says it's ok for an Israelite to marry an Adamite, you need to post it here quickly. I don't believe there is any such thing. And I believe that your suggestion that "every creature" refers to Adamites--would make a fool of God who said to destroy them, not preach to them.

The phrase "son of man" is translated from 8 different Hebrew words, which were all proper nouns. In the original Hebrew, you could distinguish between "ben Adam" and "ben Ish" because people knew who Adam and Ish were. But when this appears in English as simply "son of man", we can no longer detect the distinction. It's certainly not acceptable for an Israelite to marry a "ben ish". But in reality, I don't know of a single "ben Adam" which God didn't command us to destroy, so why would we presume that it would be ok to marry them?

Adam Was Not The First Man

And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit, 1Co 15:45

So God created Adam in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. Genesis 1:27

And the LORD God formed Adam of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and Adam became a living soul. Gen 2:7


Gen 34:25 And it came to pass on the third day, when they were sore, that two of the sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, Dinah's brethren, took each man his sword, and came upon the city boldly, and slew all the males

Gen 34:25 And it came to pass1961 on the third7992 day,3117 when they were1961 sore,3510 that two8147 of the sons1121 of Jacob,3290 Simeon8095 and Levi,3878 Dinah's1783 brethren,251 took3947 each man376 his sword,2719 and came935 upon5921 the city5892 boldly,983 and slew2026 all3605 the males.2145

Exo 13:15 And it came to pass, when Pharaoh would hardly let us go, that the LORD slew all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man, and the firstborn of beast: therefore I sacrifice to the LORD all that openeth the matrix, being males; but all the firstborn of my children I redeem.

Exo 13:15 And it came to pass,1961 when3588 Pharaoh6547 would hardly7185 let us go,7971 that the LORD3068 slew2026 all3605 the firstborn1060 in the land776 of Egypt,4714 both the firstborn4480, 1060 of man,120 and the firstborn1060 of beast:929 therefore5921, 3651 I589 sacrifice2076 to the LORD3068 all3605 that openeth6363 the matrix,7358 being males;2145 but all3605 the firstborn1060 of my children1121 I redeem.6299

Willie Martin [email protected]

Adam Was Not The First Man

        (1) Question: Were there people before Adam and Eve?

        Answer: This question is almost always asked whenever atheists and agnostics are trying to confound or confuse a New Christian! It comes from a reading of:

        "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them. Be fruitful, and multiply, and REPLENISH the earth..." (Genesis 1:2728)

        Many people have become agnostics because of the supposed conflict between the Bible and science. In truth, there is no conflict at all between a correct translation of the Bible and really proven science, not just unproven theories.

        Men have theorized for years about the possibility of the coexistence of another race of human beings upon the earth during the time of Adam. It must be recognized that there is considerable evidence to show that the earth was not only inhabited by a race(s), but as a result of the earth becoming void and without form, that race or races were apparently destroyed. But first let's look at the word "REPLENISH":


        1). to make full or complete AGAIN,   as by furnishing a NEW SUPPLY.

        2). to supply AGAIN...or the like.

        3). of PEOPLE. (New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second Edition page 1205)

        Jeremiah the Prophet refers briefly to the existence of such a race(s), but he states that, as a result of the earth becoming void and without form, that race(s) were apparently destroyed.

        "I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light. I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly. I beheld, and, lo, THERE WAS NO MAN...I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and ALL THE CITIES THEREOF WERE BROKEN DOWN AT THE PRESENCE OF THE LORD, AND BY HIS FIERCE ANGER...For this shall the earth mourn, AND THE HEAVENS ABOVE BE BLACK..." (Jeremiah 4:2328)

        Job also makes reference to a past age, a former time:

        "For enquire...OF THE FORMER AGE, and prepare thyself to the SEARCH OF THEIR FATHERS." (Job 8:8)

        Job then relates:

        "For want and famine they were solitary; fleeing into the wilderness IN FORMER TIME DESOLATE AND WASTE." (Job 30:3)

        Solomon relates:


        David relates:

        "Then the earth shook and trembled; the foundations also of the hills moved and were shaken, because he was wroth. There went up a smoke out of his nostrils, and fire out of his mouth devoured: coals were kindled by it. He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and darkness was under his feet. And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: yea, he did fly upon the wings of the wind. He made darkness his secret place; his pavilion round about him were DARKWATERS and thick clouds of the skies. At the brightness that was before him his thick clouds passed, hail stones and coals of fire. The Lord also thundered in the heavens, and the Highest gave his voice: hail stones and coals of fire. Yea, he sent out his arrows, and scattered them; and he shot out lightnings, and discomfited them. Then the channels of waters were seen, and the foundations of the world were discovered at thy rebuke, O Lord, at the blast of the breath of thy nostrils." (Psalms 18:715)

        Isaiah said:

        "...LET THEM SHEW THE FORMER THINGS..." (Isaiah 41:22)



        Then Isaiah relates a most revealing statement from God:

        "For, behold, I CREATE NEW HEAVENS (NOTE: a plural heavens: more than one) AND A NEW EARTH: AND THE FORMER SHALL NOT BE REMEMBERED, nor come into mind." (Isaiah 65:17)

        Then we have God's Law to confirm the existence of people other than Adam. Cain's wife, which is another question in itself.

        "And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord... And Cain knew his wife..." (Genesis 4:1617)

        Now most "Ministers" will repeat that old, old, worn out statement, one which cannot stand a close inspection, hence the instincts of the atheists and agnostics to that fact, giving them more fuel for the consternation they are causing the New Christian: "Cain's wife was his 'sister.'"

        Choosing to completely ignore God's Law concerning this situation.

        "The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover...The nakedness of thy father's wife's daughter, begotten of thy father, she is thy sister, thou shalt not uncover her nakedness." (Leviticus 18:9, 11)

        "And if a man shall take his sister, his father's daughter, or his mother's daughter, and see her nakedness, and she see his nakedness; it is a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people: he hath uncovered his sister's nakedness; he shall bear his iniquity." (Leviticus 20:17)

        I can just hear the atheists and agnostics cry out: "But Cain has already broken God's Law once, so why wouldn't he do so a second time." and well he might; and there is ample evidence that he did sin time and time again, But now a second, third and even a fourth person must consent to his' breaking of God's Law.

        His sister, his father (Adam) and his mother (Eve) must also consent to this violation of God's Law, not just Cain: Which would be consistent with the period of time involved, this would do violence to the Scriptures. Thus this answer is completely unacceptable.

        Thus, the only logical answer to the question is: Not only were there people on earth before, (Genesis 1:2) BUT THERE WERE OTHERS PRESENT WHEN GOD, “FORMED” A “MAN” TO TILL THE GROUND, AND WHO WAS FIRST CALLED “ADAM” IN Genesis 2:19.

        Therefore, it is clear for all to see, that the Judeo-Christian clergy say that Adam and Eve were the first man and woman, but the Bible doesn’t, it merely says Adam was the first White Man. Let’s look at the record.

        Many mistranslation in the King James Bible obscure much of the truth; for example Genesis 1:1-2:

        “In the beginning, Yahweh created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form and void and darkness was upon the face of the deep.”

        In the Hebrew it says, “Now the earth HAD BECOME chaotic and empty.” (See Rotherham’s emphasized Bible) Some early catastrophe had wrecked the earth, which was not without form and void before that. This was a judgment of Yahweh on earlier civilizations, for their wickedness. Jeremiah 4:23-27 gives a vision and we state it again to be sure you remember it:

        “I beheld the earth and lo, it was without form and void; and the heavens and they had no light. I beheld the mountains and lo, they trembled and all the hills moved lightly. I beheld and lo, there was no man and all the birds of the heavens were fled. I beheld, and lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness and ALL THE CITIES THEREOF WERE BROKEN DOWN at the presence of Yahweh and by His fierce anger. For this hath Yahweh said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end.”

        Therefore we do find buried ruins of cities older than Adam and skeletons which has been dated by several means as being several thousands of years older than Adam. The Bible itself tells us about this.

        Next the Bible tells us about the creation of MEN, IN THE PLURAL in Genesis 1:26-28 saying:

        “Male and female created he THEM and Yahweh told these people, Be fruitful and multiply and REPLENISH the earth.”

        Plenish is an obsolete English word meaning to fill. You cannot REPLENISH what was never plenished, or filled, before. In Genesis chapter 2, we find THE ADAM (in the singular) “formed.” The Hebrew word aw-dawm, rendered Adam in English, is from a root word meaning TO SHOW BLOOD IN THE FACE or OF A RUDDY COMPLEXION, a word obviously not applicable to the dark races, which we also know from scientific evidence to be much older than the White Race. Bible scholars know Genesis 3:20:

        “And Adam called his wife’s name Eve because she was the mother of all living,” is a later interpolation, which was not in the earlier manuscripts. (See Moffett’s Translation)

        Genesis chapter 4 records the birth of Cain and Abel. In the Hebrew, the wording suggests that they were twins. No other child of Eve is mentioned until the birth of Seth, when Adam was 130 years old. Certainly this was long after the birth of Cain and Abel, most scholars say this was over 100 years later. Yet, when Cain killed Abel, and in punishment was driven out of the land, he complained to Yahweh in Genesis 4:14:

        “Any one that findeth me shall slay me.”

        Upon being sent away, Cain found many other people, for Genesis 4:17 records Cain not only married a wife, but built a city. You don’t build a city for just two people. These were the pre-Adamic races, mentioned in the latter part of Genesis chapter 2.

        There is no getting around it, for there are many people who, upon reading this study will cry out “You didn’t tell us where Cain got his wife; therefore he must have married his sister or some such nonsense.” So we will show you where Cain got his wife, and it was from these pre-Adamic people.

        Where Did Cain Get His Wife?

        This is a question that has caused a lot of controversy in Christians and one which they have avoided for centuries; especially the JudeoChristians because most of them do very little if any serious Bible study. They simply let some socalled member of the clergy tell them what is what.

        Since Cain was banished to the land of Nod, after his brother's murder, and before Eve gave birth to her third son Seth (Compare Genesis 4:817 with Genesis 4:25), then there was as yet only one (supposed) descendant of Adam on earth, and this was the reprobate Cain. We know that Cain had a wife, and evidence would indicate that he had taken a female from among the BEASTS OF THE FIELD, ONE OF THE OTHER RACES.

        After the birth of his first son, Enoch, Cain built a city (Genesis 4:17). THERE CAN BE NO CITY WITHOUT INHABITANTS AND THOSE WHO INHABITED THE CITY WHICH HE BUILT WERE OBVIOUSLY THE INHABITANTS OF THE LAND OF NOD, the same creating that had been given to Adam as servants in the Garden of Eden. They were driven forth with Adam, and became wanderers, which is the meaning of the word NOD. These were a numerous people who had been CREATED (Genesis 1:27) before the FORMATION of Adam.

        Before Cain was driven forth from the presence of God, he complained:

        "My punishment is greater than I can bear, Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass that everyone that findeth me shall slay me." (Genesis 4:1314)

        A fugitive from whom? Certainly not his father and mother, Adam and Eve! From who then would he be forced to flee? And to whom did he refer when he spoke about "everyone that findeth me shall kill me?" It would be none other than the inhabitants of the land of Nod, and these inhabitants, we believe were THE OTHER RACES, THE BEAST OF THE FIELD.

        So God put a mark upon Cain(we are not told what it was) and gave a command that whosoever slew Cain, his vengeance would fall seven fold. (Possibly Cain was made to resemble the people of Nod). In any case, he was able to assemble enough people to build a city and the female he took as his wife, was not a descendant of Adam.

        A very expressive term can be found in the book of Jude, in the New Testament, when he describes the great sin of Sodom as "going after strange flesh." That is a very descriptive term. The Sodomites were given to every imaginable sexual perversion, just as they are today (See Genesis 19:19), and it was for this fifth that they were eliminated. These Sodomites were Canaanites (See Genesis 10:1519). It is most significant that Cain, is mentioned in this context in Jude 11.

        Note that Jude first mentions the angels which kept not their first estate. These may or may not have been the "sons of God who married daughters of men." (There is a great deal of argument on this among Bible scholars).

        Then Jude speaks of the Sodomites who were destroyed for the same wickedness; "going after strange flesh." These as brute BEASTS CORRUPT THEMSELVES, he says, and pronounces:

        "Woe unto them, because they have gone in the way of Cain." (Jude 611)

        Thus the wickedness of Cain, the wickedness of the Sodomites, all appear to be similar. All these filthy dreamers defiled themselves by filthy sexual intercourse with "strange flesh." (Verse 8) The civilization of Cain was very wicked and was completely wiped out by the flood. The fate of Sodom is known to every Bible reader.

        When Jeremiah wrote concerning the Babylonian captivity of the Judahites, he said:

        "And now I have given all these lands into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, My servant; and the BEASTS OF THE FIELD, have I given him also to serve him." (See Jeremiah 27:6)

when prophesying of the destruction of Babylon, he wrote,

        "O Lord, Thou hast spoken against this place, to cut it off, that none shall remain in it, neither MAN OR BEAST, but it shall be desolate forever." (Jeremiah 51:62)

        This prophecy was fulfilled ages ago, and it is most significant to find that the ancient ruins of Babylon abound with fourfooted animals but that MEN, and the BEASTS OF THE FIELD, THE OTHER RACES, ARE COMPLETELY ABSENT FROM THIS AREA.

        From these facts, we can only conclude that the BEASTS OF THE FIELD are indeed a servant race, distinct and separate from the Adamic creation of God, but who have a special place and calling in God. They are vocal, intelligent, capable of prayer, and repentance. The pure Negro stock is a servant order, as are the angels in heaven.

        The Garden of Eden was not a plantation of ordinary trees and shrubs. Yahweh did nothing so foolish as to make a special creation, just to have a man to wield shovel and pruning shears, when He already had millions of pre-Adamites available for this type of work. We are told that the Garden of Eden contained the tree of the knowledge (or experience) of good and evil. No tree of the forest has any knowledge or experience of either good or evil. Ezekiel chapter 31 says, “Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar in Lebanon, with fair branches and a shadowing bough and of an high stature; Therefore his height was exalted above all the trees of the field and his boughs were multiplied and his branches became long; all the fowls of heaven made their nests in his boughs and under his branches did all the beasts of the field bring forth their young and under his shadow dwelt all great nations. THE CEDARS IN THE GARDEN OF YAHWEH could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs and the chestnut trees were not like his branches; NOR ANY TREE IN THE GARDEN OF YAHWEH WAS LIKE UNTO HIM IN HIS BEAUTY. I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: SO THAT ALL THE TREES OF EDEN THAT WERE IN THE GARDEN OF YAHWEH ENVIED HIM.”

        Obviously, the trees in the garden of Yahweh in Eden were family trees of races and nations who admired and envied the early Assyrian empire. These made up the garden that Adam was to cultivate. Satan had been what we might call the superintendent of this planet, to rule it in obedience to Yahweh’s will, until he forfeited his position by rebellion against Yahweh.

        Adam was sent to take his place. It was Adam’s job to rule the various nations and races of the earth as Yahweh’s representative here, educating them in Yahweh’s laws and enforcing obedience to those laws. These other races and nations had been here long before Adam. Therefore the Bible makes it unmistakably clear we are not all descended from Adam and Eve, for there were other races on earth, already old, already numerous, when Adam was “formed.”

        Among these other races there are several who are simply pre-Adamic and one at least, which is satanic. If you will read the third chapter of Genesis, you will notice that, immediately after the fall of Adam, when Yahweh required them to answer what they had done, Yahweh condemned Satan. The word mistranslated serpent is the Hebrew word naw-khash, which literally means enchanter or magician.

        No doubt Satan still possessing angelic powers, was able to be an enchanter or magician. It is certain the one who seduced Eve was no mere scaly snake wriggling along on the ground. Seduced Eve, for this is what she admitted in the original Hebrew. Cain was the son of this seduction. The Bible uses the word begat with monotonous regularity but, the first time the Bible ever says Adam ever begat anyone is Genesis 5:3 where it says,

        “And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image: and called his name Seth.”

        To get back to Genesis 3:15, Yahweh said to Satan,

        “I will put enmity between THEE and the WOMAN and between THY SEED and HER SEED.”

        The same Hebrew word for seed is used in both cases. Therefore, it is clear for all those who understand the English language, that Satan was to have just as literal seed, or descendants, as Eve. Yahweh’s own word being pledged to his, we must expect to find it actually happening and we do. Yahshua tell us of it.

        In Matthew 13:38-39 explaining the parable of the tares among the wheat Yahshua says,


        In John 6:70-71 Yahshua had been talking with His twelve disciples and we read:

        “Yahshua answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve and ONE OF YOU IS A DEVIL? He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray him being one of the twelve.”

        You should read carefully John chapter 8 where Yahshua told those who hated him,

        “YE ARE OF THE DEVIL AND THE LUSTS FOR YOUR FATHER YE WILL DO...He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because YE ARE NOT OF GOD.” (John 8:44, 47)

        He was not being vulgarly abusive in either of these cases, for He never resorted to name calling so His statement was precisely accurate. He did call some of them serpents, children of vipers, which was accurate. Long before this, they had adopted THE SERPENT as a symbol of Satan. This is why their tradition had given the word naw-khash the translation serpent, when it really means enchanter. Yahshua therefore was telling them that they were of their father the devil (or serpent, fi they preferred that word). In this He was simply stating a biological fact with scientific precision and identifying the persons of this ancestry.

        Whenever someone tells you the Bible is in conflict with what modern science has proven true, don’t you believe it. The things many Judeo-Christian preachers teach are in conflict with scientific truth, as we all know, but these preachers are equally in conflict with the Bible. Go back to the Bible, not to any man made doctrines and double check it for accuracy of translation. You will find what the Bible really says, in its original languages, is accurate and with a precision our scientists have not yet achieved.


Scriptural evidence that descendants of "chay" and descendants of "adam" are two different races

Gen 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Gen 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

Gen 1:25 And God430 made6213 (853) the beast2416 of the earth776 after his kind,4327 and cattle929 after their kind,4327 and every thing3605 that creepeth7431 upon the earth127 after his kind:4327 and God430 saw7200 that3588 it was good.2896

Note that the word "beast" is translated from the Hebrew word "chay" and that it would be more accurate to translate it as man, or a non-Adamite human, and that it's the word "cattle" which is translated from the Hebrew word "behemah" which would be more accurate if it were translated as beast:

H2416 -- chay -- khah'ee

From H2421; alive; hence raw (flesh); fresh (plant, water, year), strong; also (as noun, especially in the feminine singular and masculine plural) life (or living thing), whether literally or figuratively: - + age, alive, appetite, (wild) beast, company, congregation, life (-time), live (-ly), living (creature, thing), maintenance, + merry, multitude, + (be) old, quick, raw, running, springing, troop.

H929 -- behe^ma^h --  be-hay-maw'

From an unused root (probably meaning to be mute); properly a dumb beast; especially any large quadruped or animal (often collectively): - beast, cattle.

The way this Scripture SHOULD read is:  "And God made the man of the earth after his kind, and beast after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good."   In the following Scripture, the word "man" is translated from the Hebrew word Adam, and should never have been translated as man.

Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.




From H119; ruddy, that is, a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.): - X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person.

This Scripture SHOULD read:  And God said, Let us make Adam in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Gen 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.

Jos 3:16 That the waters4325 which came down3381 from above4480, 4605 stood5975 and rose up6965 upon a259 heap5067 very3966 far7368 from the city5892 Adam,4480, 121 that834 is beside4480, 6654 Zaretan:6891 and those that came down3381 toward5921 the sea3220 of the plain,6160 even the salt4417 sea,3220 failed,8552 and were cut off:3772 and the people5971 passed over5674 right against5048 Jericho.3405

Jos 3:17 And the priests3548 that bore5375 the ark727 of the covenant1285 of the LORD3068 stood5975 firm3559 on dry ground2724 in the midst8432 of Jordan,3383 and all3605 the Israelites3478 passed over5674 on dry ground,2724 until5704, 834 all3605 the people1471 were passed5674 clean8552 over5674 (853) Jordan.3383