Posted on 2 Comments

The New Second Amendment: A Bark Worse Than Its Right

For the century or two that the Second Amendment WAS very effective and very respected in this nation, Blacks and women didn’t own guns. Do you think the loss of respect for private ownership of guns, the rapid increase in crime rates, the inability of our courts to battle crime at the same time it gave us the highest incarceration rate in the world, bar none, might have been partly due to giving them these rights?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

2 thoughts on “The New Second Amendment: A Bark Worse Than Its Right

  1. The following was posted on Huffington Post but apparently was censored:

    “We need to put the Second Amendment in the proper context, as our Founding Fathers envisioned it. The primary beneficiaries of the right to own firearms are women, yet the primary victims of the right to own firearms are Blacks who constitute more than 90% of firearm deaths. You can’t grasp why the Second Amendment worked so well for so long unless you grasp these important distinctions.”

  2. It appears that the following was also censored from Huffingtonpost:

    “For the century or two that the Second Amendment WAS very effective and very respected in this nation, Blacks and women didn’t own guns. Do you think the loss of respect for private ownership of guns, the rapid increase in crime rates, the inability of our courts to battle crime at the same time it gave us the highest incarceration rate in the world, bar none, might have been partly due to giving them these rights?”

Leave a Reply