 |
Speculation: Tell the truth about Einstein and
the cash cow dies (Einstein loses credibility). Engage in half truths about Einstein for
decades, get Time Magazine to elevate Einstein to the status of Person of the Century and
the supreme con works. All you have to do to make the con work is suppress unfavorable
information about Einstein He was a plagiarist yet somehow this information never made it
to the American public. How many of you ever heard that Einstein was a blatant, brazen
plagiarist? Why havent you heard it? The physics community buried it. Then the physics
community makes billions of dollars from grants, awards, power, prestige, stipends, money,
travel, book deals, honoraria, etc over the next several decades. Advertising people would
readily agree, that Person of the Century is worth billions of dollars to the physics
community over the next 25 to 50 years. This is similar to artificially inflating a stock
price with false stories and then cashing in at the lofty price. Substitute getting
research grants approved instead of cashing in at a lofty price, and you have the physics
community.
It should be obvious that there is absolutely no incentive for the physics community to
tell the truth about Einstein except that they might get caught. They have a tremendous
conflict of interest between telling the truth about Einstein or promoting physics. It
appears that telling the truth about Einstein is not high on the list of priorities of the
physics community. One of the ways that the physics community has legal problems is with
respect to the phrase passive fraud. I define passive fraud as the willingness to leave on
the record false information and then benefit from that false information. In other words,
the physics community may not have to do anything proactive. All they have to do is permit
false and misleading information to go unchallenged and then benefit from it.
The physics community may face the following charges: 1)Conspiracy, for failing to get out
the truth about Einstein, 2)Fraud, for the placement (or covert support) of false
information on the record and then benefitting from it, 3)Perjury, for false statements in
research grants, 4)Racketeering, For acting like organized criminals. 5)Obstruction of
justice as the scientists try to destroy documents. The justice department should squeeze
undergraduates first, then graduates, then adjunct professors, then full professors, then
Department Heads, then the chancellors of the universities, and then Nobel Laureates. The
level of criminality that the physics community has engaged in is perhaps fourth or fifth
behind organized crime as the leading class of criminals in our society in terms of total
felonies committed and magnitude of the money involved.
One of the biggest problems facing the physics community is that they are incredibly
arrogant and view themselves as being intellectually superior. Consider these passages
from Gleicks book, CHAOS, Making a New Science: These scientists had experience with
brilliance and with eccentricity. p. 2, I understand youre real smart, Agnew said to
Feigenbaum, If youre so smart, why dont you just solve laser fusion? p.2, To a physicist,
creating laser fusion was a legitimate problem; puzzling out the spin and color and flavor
of small particles was a legitimate problem; dating the origin of the universe was a
legitimate problem. Understanding clouds was a job for a meteorologist. Like other
physicists, Feigenbaum used an understated, tough-guy vocabulary to rate such problems.
p.3, The most passionate advocates of the new science go so far as to say that Twentieth
century science will be remembered for just three things: relativity, quantum mechanics,
and chaos. p.6
What the physics community is going to realize is that, painfully, their very intelligence
is their greatest enemy; a Mafia underling with an IQ of 80, might not realize he was in
the middle of a conspiracy. Is a brilliant physicist unaware of what it meant if Einstein
was a plagiarist or that the physics community had falsified the data surrounding the
eclipse of 1919 and 1922? Were they completely unaware that falsehoods with respect to
Einstein would result in an increase in funding to the physics community? The physics
community has two choices: They may argue that they are incredible ignoramuses and have no
idea of illegal activities. The basic problem with this approach is that the phyics
community has gone to great pains to tell us how brilliant they are. Now that they are
caught conducting illegal activity, they have to play dumb. Somehow, a defense along the
lines of: When Im a physicist, Im brilliant, but when Im a crook, Im stupid, has poor
prospects of success. This is not a recommended defense for the physics community. So why
are we funding stupid people? Or, they knew what was going on and deliberately covered it
up. In which case, they are crooks. Why are we funding crooks?
|
|
|