Free news

FREE blog







Gun poll








14th Amdt

19th Amdt













LIAR Faith Full


A feminazi LIAR admits that she UNDERSTANDS the Word of God, but then goes on to claim that God is "TOTAL RUBBISH, the following", proving once anf for all that Scripture was written for men to understand, not for women.


From: "Viva Veridad" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected] yahoogroups. com>
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [israeliteidentity] the facts

TOTAL RUBBISH, the following:
[read: Jesus is not the head of woman.  Jesus is the head of man.  Man is the head of woman, and God is the head of Jesus.  Women must be obedient to their men, not to God nor to Jesus.]

This means that women must pay no attention to God, to Jesus, but only to men!

What a laugh!

It's a good thing I know there are intelligent men around for if women had to be subservient to the likes of John Knight and Terry Gabrich, that would be the ultimate in INSULT to womanhood.  It would be like God caving in to the Devil!

No, my very stupid friends, men are as imperfect as the rest of us, and no woman has to be obedient to a man who turns out to be an IDIOT!





After claiming it was "hatred" to note that God commands that the death penalty be applied to sodomites, she DENIED she wrote that.


Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:42:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [jewsareedom] The 'mortal sin' of homosexuality
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

But we all know that JK hates women, and he hates gays - one wonders what the hatred stems from.  




Now that we know we’re dealing, not just with an anti-Christ pagan goddess worshiping whore, but ALSO a faggot whore, it’s time to set the record straight on just what Americans think of you and your “gay rights”.


Tell us, debunked: is this known and proven faggot still credible in your Catholic eyes?


What kind of a “Christian” would claim that it’s “hatred” simply to UPHOLD God’s Law against sodomy?


John Knight




The following can be seen in its original form at:








horizontal rule

From: Jacob Israel <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Fri, December 18, 2009 4:29:03 PM

<<<Jesus elevated women.  Mary Magdalene was very close to him.   He spoke with the woman at the well which was not done.   He had passover dinner at the home of Mary, the sister of Joseph of Aramethea.   Also never done.   I wonder what he would think of the role of women today.   He might not agree with the Pope.  Long Live the American nuns in protest.  >>>
Only in your wildest feminazi dreams.
THROUGHOUT SCRIPTURE, men DO speak with women, men DO have passover dinners at the homes of women.
Jesus did NOT change the Word of God one iota, nor would He have "elevated women" in a way that violated the Word of God
The OTHER thing He did not change is the ROLE of women, which is that they are NEVER to have authority over ANY man:
For God is NOT [the author] of CONFUSION, but of peace, as in all communities of the holy people.  Let your women keep silence in the communities: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.  And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their man at home: for it is shameful for a woman to speak in assembly, 1 Corinthians 14:33-35


From: Viva Veridad
To: Mark
Cc: Jacob Israel ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: a necessary evil

Mark, your words hold a lot of truth. Blocking him is an excellent thing to do. He - John Knight - is, in my opinion, satanically driven and loves to hate - which we who follow the Bible are forbidden to do.

From: Mark <[email protected]>
To: Viva Veridad <[email protected]>
Cc: Jacob Israel <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 2:02:03 AM
Subject: Re: a necessary evil


I don't know if you saw the thing Ken posted yesterday about sociopaths, or what I posted today about sociopaths who "get religion" (and combine the destructive and narcissistic components of their illness with a "mandate from God"), but I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts John Knight is one of those people (if only because I've been around sociopaths and especially sociopaths who "got religion") and I can tell you:
1) You (and the rest of us) are wasting our time arguing or even trying to discuss anything with him; and
2) More than likely, at this point John Knight is playing with us if for no other purpose to piss us off. Sociopaths do that.

My suggestion: LET'S CUT HIM OFF AND BLOCK HIM. John is not amenable to discussion or reason: his mind physiologically doesn't work that way. John is simply NOT REACHABLE.

This is one of those times when I'm going to cut to the chase and simply state things as they are: with some people we can agree to disagree, and others we have to release and say, "ENOUGH!". John is one of those people.

To John: since you're so brave and so free with the word "nigger", why don't you show us how brave you are and go into the south side of Chicago, say around 95th Street, or into a slum in Detroit and yell that word as loudly as you can, ten times -- then come back and tell us what happened. Unless, of course, you're not as brave as you let on ...

[email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
{ o o }

On Dec 29, 2009, at 7:38 PM, Viva Veridad <[email protected]> wrote:

The Republic of Ireland is Catholic, you idiot!

From: Jacob Israel <[email protected]>
To: Viva Veridad <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]m; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 12:25:38 AM
Subject: a necessary evil

<<< As an observant traditional Roman Catholic taught by Roman Catholic religious persons, I can personally vouch for the above.

John Knight certainly HATES the Catholic Church. We can ALL vouch for that. >>>

No, what we can *all* vouch for is that what your filthy “church” SAYS, what it DOES, and the OUTCOME, are three entirely separate species.

Even algae can vouch for that.

Your “church” SAYS that it opposes abortion and divorce and murder.

Who KNOWS what it DOES in the background to produce just the OPPOSITE, which is the WORLD’S {not just the country’s} undisputed HIGHEST abortion and divorce and murder rates.


· The abortion rate per 1000 women in mostly Catholic states like Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey EXCEEDS 40, while it’s less than 10 (one quarter as much abortion) in less Catholic states like Utah, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

· Ditto for divorce rates which are 50% higher in ALL mostly Catholic states.

· Ditto for MURDER rates which are up to FOUR HUNDRED TIMES HIGHER.

· And for the incarceration rate of niggers which is up to THREE TIMES higher.

New York is right now “bragging” that it got its murder rate “down” to only 6 murders per 100k people. Whoop de doo. That’s “only” 30 TIMES higher than North Dakota, or Singapore, or the Republic of Ireland, or Saudi Arabia.


Vouch for THAT!

John Knight

From: Viva Veridad [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 3:59 PM
To: Jacob Israel; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: a necessary evil

The problem with John Knight is that he lies incessantly.

The Catholic Church certainly does not hate marriage.

The Catholic Church certainly does not LOVE homosexuality.

As an observant traditional Roman Catholic taught by Roman Catholic religious persons, I can personally vouch for the above.

John Knight certainly HATES the Catholic Church. We can ALL vouch for that.


From: Jacob Israel <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; b[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Tue, December 29, 2009 6:11:29 PM
Subject: RE: a necessary evil

The problem with the Catholic Church is that it secretly HATES marriage and LOVES homosexuality [read: SODOMY, which is a CRIME]:

"… it could prove extremely useful that the general congregation reaffirm … especially … the pastoral care of homosexual persons"

If this “church” does not get back to God’s Law FAST, it’s finished:

And a man who lieth with a male as one lieth with a woman; abomination both of them have done; they are certainly put to death; their blood is on them. Leviticus 20:13

This can NEVER change. And ignoring it will DESTROY any society.

John Knight

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 8:52 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: a necessary evil

Viva probably went to one of those Irish boarding schools. Notorious for screwing with your head and seeing God's enemies all over the place.

In a message dated 12/29/2009 11:46:47 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes:

Where do you get that, Viva?

I may be gay, but I'm also in a 20-year relationship with my same-sex partner; and I know (personally) many male and female same-sex partners who have been in a faithful, loving, monogamous relationship with the same partner for 20, 30, 40, 50 - and in one case 62 years (before one of the partners died at the age of 91).

Which I believe is a FAR better track record than most HETEROsexuals, who average two divorces and three marriages within their lifetimes (and according to a 2004 survey by Barna) most of these divorces and remarriages occur among Christians.


[email protected]

Sent from my iPhone


{ o o }


On Dec 29, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Viva Veridad <[email protected]> wrote:

Only in the head's of the unbelievers, who just want a liberal life-style of sex with whoever you want, whenever you want, without any self-control or respect for one's person.


From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; niko[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Tue, December 29, 2009 2:20:06 PM
Subject: Re: a necessary evil

what's wrong with that is IT FUCKS UP EVERYBODY'S HEAD!!!!

In a message dated 12/29/2009 6:49:27 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes:

Isn't the "occasion of sin" what leads to sex? That's logical. If you want to avoid sex as a teenager, and keep it for when it matters (marriage) then it is best to avoid temptation, e.g. occasions of sin.

I don't see what's so wrong with that. Less problems for teenagers, more time to spend on worthwhile projects and wholesome events.


From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Tue, December 29, 2009 7:27:06 AM
Subject: Re: a necessary evil

Sex has always been the worst sin of Catholics. It's ingrained whether it's actually doctrine or not. I remember the retreats I went to in high school and altho we all know that sex is NUMERO UNO SIN next to murder, the 'occasions of sin' were the killers. Entertaining sexual thoughts was a sin. Any form of light petting at the drive-in was just as bad as 'doing it.' And it went on and on. Everything that might lead us down the road to actually having sex was just as bad. Really screwed us up. Some of my friends never got over it. Sexual inhibition is rampant in the Catholic church. I have a friend who had sex for the first time at 68. I don't think God meant for people to live this way.

In a message dated 12/28/2009 6:26:52 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes:

Virginia quotes: <image001.jpg> It has been alleged that the early Church made illicit sex a grave sin, and even at one point made married sex a sin in the majority of circumstances, because they knew most people would still have sex and they would then have to depend on the church for forgiveness and paid indulgences.<image002.jpg>

True: the early Church made illicit sex a grave sin - and it is still a sin.

False: The church NEVER made married sex a sin - EVER. There is NOTHING to forgive if people have lawful marital sexual relations. To say otherwise is IDIOTIC.

The paid indulgence scheme didn't last very long perpetuated as it was by men who cared more for money than for their own faith. One cannot blame the church for what some of its non-observant "followers" did.


From: virginiaf.raines <[email protected]>
To: Viva Veridad <[email protected]>
Cc: Jimmy Jumshade <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Sun, December 27, 2009 8:25:57 PM
Subject: a necessary evil

After reportedly leading a wanton and lascivious lifestyle, Augustine left his mistress and children and totally reversed himself by vowing to be celibate. Thereafter he saw the "flesh" as wicked, flawed and sinful. Augustine also saw himself as staunchly Catholic.

Given St. Augustine's strong anti-sex views, it will surprise and maybe baffle some that this sainted man felt that prostitution was necessary in society. According to a quote: "If you expel prostitution from society you will unsettle everything on account of lusts."

According to Father Thomas Raush, Chair of Theological Studies, Loyola Marymount University, "It's regrettable that St. Augustine's influence and the negative appraisal of sexuality, based on his own struggles to be chaste, has so impacted negatively with Christian tradition."

<image001.jpg>It has been alleged that the early Church made illicit sex a grave sin, and even at one point made married sex a sin in the majority of circumstances, because they knew most people would still have sex and they would then have to depend on the church for forgiveness and paid indulgences.<image002.jpg>

It will probably be equally surprising to many that Thomas Aquinas, another major influence in Christianity, also felt that prostitution was a necessary evil for a society.

We cite this not to advocate prostitution, but to show just how much views on sexuality have changed over the years -- even within the Church.

<image004.jpg>More modern Christian scholars use a stronger word than "regrettable" for the damage that this man's warped views have done over the centuries -- especially when it comes to the plight of women.


On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Viva Veridad <[email protected]> wrote:

Only to those who have never learned self-control.




jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition


Hit Counter


Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party