Free news

FREE blog







Gun poll








14th Amdt

19th Amdt














The Biased Gallup Organization

We thank Professor Russell D. Renka for making the following observation:

Some advocacy groups attack legitimate pollsters and polls by distorting their data and purposes.  A Christian conservative group with the name Fathers' Manifesto recently produced Abortion Polls by the Gallup Organization to attack this well-known and reputable pollster's alleged misrepresentation of American public opinion on legalized abortion.  They said "The fact that almost half of their fellow citizens view the 40 million abortions which have been performed in this country as the direct result of an unpopular, immoral and unconstitutional act by their own government, as murder, is an important thing for Americans to know.  This is not a trivial point, yet the Gallup Organization took it upon itself to trivialize it by removing any and all references to these facts from their web site" and followed that with a link to the offender, at Page Not Found at URL   The truth is far simpler than consipracy.  In late 2002, Gallup went private on the web with nearly all its regular issue sets, not excepting abortion.  One will only know this by escaping the confines of an advocate group's narrow perspective and seeing the targeted poll and pollster's own take on the issue.

The lesson is that any poll-based report must make the full source information available to its readership.  There is no excuse for not identifying the source or directly linking to the source.  If they do neither, it's grounds for suspicion that they want you to take their word as the final authority.  That is not acceptable conduct in the world of polls and surveys.  I do not mean the report must literally attach links, although that's never a bad idea.  But they must identify the source in such a way that anyone can then do a standard search and examine the original source material.

This is good advice, Professor.  Had you read on, or contacted us, or even contacted Gallup, you would have avoided the opportunity to ignore your own advice.   You would have known that the jew controlled Gallup Organization had our web site shut down a year before they "went private on the web with nearly all its regular issue sets, not excepting abortion".

Of course the reason the web site was shut down is because we attempted to "make the full source information available to its readership.  There is no excuse for not identifying the source or directly linking to the source".  When we linked to the source, long before they changed their policy, they moved the link.  When we provided all the data on one web page with a link to the source, they complained that we were trying to steal their look and feel.  When we removed the look and feel and assured Gallup's lawyers that we were interested only in keeping the information on the internet, the lawyers shut down the entire web site and not just this one page.  And now, when we criticize Gallup for predatory practices, you claim that we're attempting to hide our sources, or expected people to "take [our] word as the final authority"

Americans Closely Divided Between Two Abortion Labels
Forty-eight percent of those surveyed by Gallup this year described their abortion views as pro-choice, and 42 percent as pro-life. The trend on this question, first asked by Gallup in 1995, shows an increase during 1996 in the percentage of Americans identifying their views as pro-life that has largely been maintained through today.  

bulletThe question should have been "pro-life vs. pro-death" rather than "pro-life vs. pro-choice".
bulletThe incredible bias of this polling organization is revealed by Gallup:
bulletCompletely ignoring any contribution by the father in a decision to abort HIS offspring.
bulletFailing to pose a question about what people think about the fact that legalized abortion caused the Supreme Court to rule that the mother is the sole decision maker regarding an abortion, with the husband having absolutely no legal say in the matter whatsoever.
bulletFailing to pose a question about the relationship between the doubling of the divorce rate and Roe vs. Wade.
bulletFailing to pose a question about why the "Roe" in Roe vs. Wade is now lobbying to get Roe vs. Wade overturned.
bulletFailing to pose a question about what people think of the 40 million potential fellow Americans who were aborted since Roe ve. Wade.
bulletIgnores that 99% of all abortions are not required:
bulletTo protect either a mother's or baby's life, health, mental health, or
bulletBecause of rape or incest.

These are signs of an advocacy organization, not an objective polling organization.  And exactly what is Gallup advocating?  The overthrow of this Christian society, perhaps?  The imposition of minority jewish opinion on the vast majority of Americans who are Christians and disagree with the minority who are jews?  The "liberal" bias of mediots?

The Gallup Organization complained to our ISP because we displayed their abortion poll on our web pages.   What did they have to hide?  They used the excuse that we were using their "touch and feel", something we have utterly no interest in.  They proceeded with their complaint to our ISP and had our web site shut down even though the trademark Gallup graphics were removed, leaving only the graphs and charts, as below.  Why?   Why did they use every trick in the book to shut down this public discourse?   Because we slandered Gallup?  Absolutely not.  Until this tactic, we even accepted the credibility of their polls, but not any longer.

Were they perhaps afraid of the truth?

Gallup's expertise at LYING to promote their narrow jewish agenda while pretending to be objective is revealed by the simple fact that even polls in La La Land by the LA Times show 57% agree that "abortion is murder" while Gallup shouts from the roof tops that only 42% claim to be pro-life.  These are intentionally misleading and DISHONEST catch phrases.  There is utterly nothing "pro-choice" about taking the life of a baby who has no choice, and whose father has been legally excised from protecting him.

What would happen to this poll if Gallup were HONEST for a change?  What would the results be if they asked:  "Are you pro-life or pro-murder"?  What would the results be if they asked the above HONEST questions?

57% of Americans know that Gallup is nothing less than a *criminal* mass murderer for championing precisely the hideous agenda which led to the murder of 40 million potential fellow Americans in the womb.



January, 2000

Abortion Attitudes Today

by Karlyn Bowman
Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute

If past elections are a guide, it is a safe bet that abortion will be a topic of much discussion. Already the issue has generated considerable contoversy in both parties. All of the major candidates for the presidency have felt compelled to spell out their positions on the issue with great care. The leading Republican candidates describe themselves as pro-life. The Democratic contenders have planted themselves firmly on the pro-choice side of the debate.

The abortion issue clearly divides the candidates. But what about the rest of us?

In part because the debate over the legality of abortion has continued unabated since the Supreme Court's landmark Roe vs. Wade decision in 1973, the major polling firms have investigated attitudes about it regularly. Hundreds of questions have been asked from many different angles. Gallup returned to the subject in late April of this year, updating a series of questions, some of which have been asked for more than two decades.

Gauging public opinion on some issues is difficult because many of us haven't thought much about them. Many people don't have opinions about the GATT treaty, for example, or about what the International Monetary Fund should do about Asia's financial crisis. One of the most striking things about the collection of polling questions on abortion is that on almost every question, nearly everyone has an opinion. Not only do most people have opinions about abortion, but the data collected by Gallup and other survey organizations also suggest that opinions be firmly held. Results on many questions vary little from year to year. It is not possible, however, to characterize these stable opinions simply.

Long-term Trend
Gallup's most frequently asked question about abortion has been asked 27 times since 1975. As the figure here shows, in 1999, 27 percent said abortion should be legal in all circumstances, 55 percent only under certain circumstances, and 16 percent illegal in all circumstances. In recent years, the proportion saying abortion should be legal in all circumstances has outweighed the proportion wanting to make it illegal in all circumstances, but neither has ever been a majority sentiment.



The results of a question Louis Harris and Associates began asking in 1985 have also been consistent. In 1985, 25 percent of those surveyed favored permitting a woman who wants to have an abortion to have one in all circumstances, 53 percent favored this in some circumstances, and 20 percent in no circumstances. In 1998, those proportions were very similar -- 23, 58, and 17 percent, respectively.

In 1994, Gallup began asking the vast group in the middle, those people who said abortion should be legal only under some circumstances, whether they thought it should be legal under most circumstances or only in a few circumstances. As the next chart shows, most of those people in the middle want abortion to be legal in only a few circumstances.




Competing Values of Life and Choice
Beyond these general positions, the vast body of public opinion data on abortion suggests that the issue evokes two powerful sentiments. One is a reverence for life. When CBS News and the New York Times asked in January 1998 which of two statements was closer to people's own opinion, half (50 percent) chose "abortion is the same thing as murdering a child," although 38 percent chose "abortion is not murder because the fetus really isn't a child." Eighty-six percent in both 1992 and 1996 told Gallup interviewers that they favored a law requiring doctors to inform patients about alternatives to abortion before performing the procedure. Abortion is serious matter, the public is saying, and should not be undertaken lightly.

Another powerful feeling comes through clearly in the survey data. Ours is a very individualistic society, and Americans like the idea of making choices themselves. In areas as different as decisions about whether or not to smoke, to support a third party, or even to take one's own life, Americans want individual decision-making respected. When the abortion issue is framed in terms of choice, majorities support letting a woman make her own decision about having an abortion. In a January 1998 poll for NBC News and the Wall Street Journal, Hart/Teeter Research found 60 percent of respondents agreeing "The choice of an abortion should be left up to the woman and her doctor," while 26 percent said the procedure should be legal only in cases where the pregnancy results from rape or incest or when the life of the woman is at risk, and 11 percent said it should be illegal in all circumstances.

In part because Americans support the idea of individual choice, they do not want to ban abortion. Gallup's question, like those of other pollsters, shows majorities opposed to a ban. In 1996 and 1998, 56 and 59 percent respectively told Gallup interviewers that they opposed a constitutional amendment to ban abortion in all circumstances, except when necessary to save the life of the mother. A CBS News/New York Times question asked in 1982 and again in 1998 shows even larger majorities (68 and 76 percent, respectively) opposed to an amendment to the Constitution which would make all abortions illegal.

Some Grounds for Abortion More Acceptable than Others
Americans do not want to outlaw abortion because they value individual choice. They are, however, willing to see some restrictions put on its use because of their reverence for life, and they don't want abortion to be undertaken simply for convenience. When Gallup and the National Opinion Research Center ask questions about the circumstances under which a woman should be permitted to have a legal abortion, overwhelming majorities support abortion when the circumstance of the pregnancy is beyond the woman's control. Such circumstances include cases of rape or incest, or when the mother or fetus's health is seriously endangered. Support drops when the circumstance is one where a woman can control her fertility. Only 32 percent told Gallup interviewers in July 1996 that abortion should be legal "when the woman or family cannot afford to raise the child," but 62 percent said it should be illegal. A Gallup survey conducted in 1989 for Newsweek magazine found particularly low support for abortion when undertaken for sex selection. Only 15 percent of Americans in that poll said abortion should be legal "when the sex of the child is not what the parents want," while 80 percent felt such abortions should be illegal.



Late-term Abortions Widely Opposed
The Supreme Court's decision in Roe vs. Wade permits abortion throughout a pregnancy, but it allows restrictions to be put on its use in the second and third trimesters. In Gallup's 1996 poll on abortion, 64 percent said abortion should be generally legal in the first three months of a pregnancy, but a virtually identical number, 65 percent, said that second trimester abortions should be generally illegal. And 82 percent of those surveyed believed abortions in the third trimester should be generally illegal, with only 13 percent saying they should be generally legal.



Americans support other restrictions on abortions. In Gallup's 1996 poll, 74 percent supported a 24-hour waiting period, 74 percent parental notification for women under 18 years of age, and 70 percent spousal notification.

Although most questions in this area show attitudes to be quite stable over time, a few show some change. In April 1996, 57 percent of those surveyed by Gallup favored a law that would make it illegal to perform a specific abortion procedure conducted in the last six months of pregnancy known as a "partial birth abortion, except in cases necessary to save the life of the mother." The graphic nature of the ensuing congressional debate had an impact on opinion. By July, 71 percent wanted to make it illegal. At the same time, the Gallup long-term trend concerning legality of abortion showed a drop in the percentage of Americans who think abortion should be legal in all circumstances, from approximately one-third to one-quarter. (See Saad article in Feb/Mar 1998 issue of Public Perspective Magazine for a full discussion of the impact of partial-birth issue on abortion attitudes). While opposition to partial-birth abortion has subsequently fallen back somewhat -- now at 61 percent -- support for abortion under any circumstances remains at just 23 percent. This is a relatively small but significant change compared to just three years ago, before the partial-birth issue was raised.

Americans Closely Divided Between Two Abortion Labels
Forty-eight percent of those surveyed by Gallup this year described their abortion views as pro-choice, and 42 percent as pro-life. The trend on this question, first asked by Gallup in 1995, shows an increase during 1996 in the percentage of Americans identifying their views as pro-life that has largely been maintained through today.



When Gallup recently asked people in each group how strongly they felt about the label they had just chosen, those in the pro-life group were more likely to say they felt strongly (67 percent) than those in the pro-choice camp (55 percent.) Pro-life Americans were also more likely than those who are pro-choice to say they will only vote for candidates who share their abortion views, by a 24 percent to 16 percent margin.

For most voters (51 percent in the new Gallup poll) a candidate's position on the issue is just one of many important factors he or she will consider when casting a ballot, and for about three in ten, abortion will not be a major issue. Around one in five voters say they will only vote for a candidate who shares their views on abortion. This includes 10 percent of Americans who will only vote for candidates who share their pro-life views, and 7 percent who are equally strict about voting pro-choice. These voters represent a consequential proportion of the electorate and their strong feelings about abortion explain in part why the issue of abortion continues to get so much attention and why candidates feel the need to spell out their positions early in election cycles.

The abortion issue does not divide men or women in significant ways. Older people, as the table below shows, are generally less likely to call themselves pro-choice than younger people. Those with more formal education and higher incomes tend to be more supportive of legal abortion than those with less education and lower incomes. Democrats and Republicans are mirror images on the pro-choice, pro-life question, with 38 percent of Republicans identifying themselves and pro-choice, and 57 percent pro-life, while 53% of Democrats consider themselves pro-choice and 34 percent pro-life. Protestants and Catholics tend to differ little on their attitudes on most questions relating to abortion, but in this Gallup question, Catholics are more likely than Protestants to embrace the pro-choice label. Those who are more active in their faith are generally more likely to call themselves pro-life than those who are less active. Of those who consider religion very important in their lives, for example, just 31 percent are pro-choice. Among those who say religion is not important in their lives, that proportion is 83 percent.

Gallup/CNN/USA Today Poll, April 30-May 2, 1999With respect to the abortion issue, would you consider yourself to be pro-choice or pro-life?


Pro-choice Pro-life
National adults 48 42
Men 47 43
Women 49 42
18-29 years 47 45
30-49 years 54 39
50-64 47 44
65 and older 35 46
East 55 38
Midwest 46 45
South 39 48
West 56 36
College graduate 57 38
Some college 48 45
No college 43 43
$50,000 and over 54 40
$30,000-49,999 55 41
$20,000-29,999 36 49
Less than $20,000 39 45
Republican 38 57
Independent 51 40
Democratic 53 34
Protestant 42 46
Catholic 50 46
Importance of Religion    
Very important 31 58
Fairly important 37 26
Not important 83 9

The data presented here provide a sampling of a vast collection of survey data collected by the pollsters on abortion. What is striking is that a quarter century of debate has not significantly changed attitudes on abortion. Most Americans remain of two minds about the issue, pulled on some questions in the pro-life direction and on others, to the pro-choice one. That is the reality politicians must confront.


Guest Scholar Poll Review Archive:


bulletAbortion Attitudes Today
bulletShifts In Public Approval of Labor Unions in the United States, 1936-1999


The Morality of Abortion

Asked about the morality of abortion in general, Americans are evenly divided: 42% told Gallup in a May 2001 survey that abortion is morally acceptable while 45% answered that it is morally wrong.

Asked whether abortion is murder, slightly differently worded questions have produced slightly different rates of agreement, ranging between 45% and 57%. Questions that ask whether abortion is an "act of murder" tend to produce answers that are slightly lower than those that simply ask whether abortion is murder.

bulletDo you agree or disagree with this statement? Abortion is murder.

Los Angeles Times, June 2000: 57% agree; 36% disagree

bulletWhich of these statements comes closer to your opinion: Abortion is the same thing as murdering a child, or abortion is not murder because the fetus really isn't a child?

CBS/New York Times, January 1998: 50% murder; 38% not murder

bulletDo you think abortion is an act of murder, or don’t you feel this way?

CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll, January 1998: 48% murder and 45% don’t feel this way

bulletWhat is your view -- do you think abortion is an act of murder, or don’t you feel this way? Time/CNN, August 1994: 43% murder; 47% don’t feel this way

A unique question asked by the Center for Survey Research at the University of Virginia explored Americans’ feelings about abortion as murder in greater detail. Given four categories to choose from, a combined 48% indicate abortion is murder while 42% say it is not murder -- very similar to the Gallup’s 1998 findings. However, as can be seen, about one-fifth of those who consider abortion murder make a distinction between abortion and killing a person who is already born. On the other side, two-thirds of those who do not consider abortion murder nevertheless perceive it as the taking of human life. Only 16% of Americans view it as a surgical procedure for removing human tissue.

Which of these statements best describes your feelings about abortion? Abortion is just as bad as killing a person who has already been born, it is a murder. Abortion is murder, but it is not as bad as killing someone who has already been born. Abortion is not murder, but it does involve the taking of human life. Abortion is not murder, it is a surgical procedure for removing human tissue?

University of Virginia, January 1996

Murder, as bad as killing person already born


Murder, not as bad as killing a person already born


Not murder, does involve taking human life


Not murder, is a surgical procedure for removing human tissue


No opinion


One refrain sometimes heard in the abortion debate is "I am personally opposed to abortion, but I would not impose my beliefs on others." In fact, for a majority of Americans, their personal judgement about the morality of abortion and their views about its legality are in general alignment. Moreover, very few Americans appear conflicted in the described way. According to Gallup’s May 2001 survey on abortion, only 5% of all Americans simultaneously believe abortion is morally wrong and that it should be legal in all or most circumstances.

Most of those saying abortion is morally acceptable (72%) believe abortion should be legal in all or most circumstances, while a somewhat larger number (87%) of those who say abortion is morally wrong believe it should be legal in only a few or no circumstances. As shown in the chart below, the relationship between one’s personal belief about an issue and one’s attitudes toward how society should treat it is fairly consistent across a variety of issues, with two exceptions. A relatively large number of those saying abortion is not morally wrong, nevertheless feel abortion should be legal in only a few circumstances (26%) -- putting them into the "generally illegal" category. A similar degree of inconsistency is seen among those who believe that doctor-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia, is morally wrong, with 27% of this group nevertheless believing it should be legal.


Morality vs. Legality
May 2001



Morality vs. Legality
May 2001



jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition


Hit Counter


Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party