or joogle LIES?
While 18,600 web sites address the FACT that Dylan Klebold, the mass killer in Columbine, Colorado, was a jew, not a SINGLE “news media” article ever even mentions that FACT. When searching Google for “who’s a jew” to determine if any “news” source even KNOWS how to discover whether or not a person is a jew, the following RACIST HATE SCREED popped up from Google:
An explanation of our search results.
If you recently used Google to search for the word "Jew," you may have seen results that were very disturbing. We assure you that the views expressed by the sites in your results are not in any way endorsed by Google. We'd like to explain why you're seeing these results when you conduct this search.
A site's ranking in Google's search results relies heavily on computer algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate a page's relevance to a given query. Sometimes subtleties of language cause anomalies to appear that cannot be predicted. A search for "Jew" brings up one such unexpected result.
If you use Google to search for "Judaism," "Jewish" or "Jewish people," the results are informative and relevant. So why is a search for "Jew" different? One reason is that the word "Jew" is often used in an anti-Semitic context. Jewish organizations are more likely to use the word "Jewish" when talking about members of their faith. The word has become somewhat charged linguistically, as noted on websites devoted to Jewish topics such as these:
Someone searching for information on Jewish people would be more likely to enter terms like "Judaism," "Jewish people," or "Jews" than the single word "Jew." In fact, prior to this incident, the word "Jew" only appeared about once in every 10 million search queries. Now it's likely that the great majority of searches on Google for "Jew" are by people who have heard about this issue and want to see the results for themselves.
The beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google, as well as the opinions of the general public, do not determine or impact our search results. Individual citizens and public interest groups do periodically urge us to remove particular links or otherwise adjust search results. Although Google reserves the right to address such requests individually, Google views the comprehensiveness of our search results as an extremely important priority. Accordingly, we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it. We will, however, remove pages from our results if we believe the page (or its site) violates our Webmaster Guidelines, if we believe we are required to do so by law, or at the request of the webmaster who is responsible for the page.
We apologize for the upsetting nature of the experience you had using Google and appreciate your taking the time to inform us about it.
The Google Team
p.s. You may be interested in some additional information the Anti-Defamation League has posted about this issue at http://www.adl.org/rumors/google_search_rumors.asp. In addition, we call your attention to Google's search results on this topic.
If you’re as offended as you SHOULD be by this RACIST HATE SCREED, read on. The fact that the ADL, the most RACIST, certifiably terroristic, ANTI-Christ organization in this nation *endorses* Google for this RACIST HATE SCREED by itself should make any normal person suspicion. But there’s more, MUCH more. One of the web sites included in the above condemnation of our FOUNDING FATHERS’S BASIC PRINCIPLES, free speech, is the following ACCURATE list of famous [or infamous as the case may be] jews, simply a LIST with no commentary whatsoever:
Why should posting the SIMPLE PLAIN TRUTH about jewish influence in OUR putative Christian nation with no commentary at ALL strike a nerve at Google?
Google LIED when they wrote “we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it” because they HAVE censored that entire site in one form or another BASED ON ONE COMPLAINT FROM ONE JEW. THEY openly ADMIT that this CHRISTIAN web site has been BANNED by Google, and that entire web sites have been SHUT DOWN by Google simply for providing a Google search link to this site. They went so far as to THREATEN one of the developers of one of the SOFTWARE PROGRAMS used on this site with removal of their Google Ads JUST because we used that program [and STILL do, though in a modified form].
Keep that in mind if you’re ever inclined to believe that Google search results are NOT biased in favor of jews.
The statement <<<If you use Google to search for "Judaism," "Jewish" or "Jewish people," the results are informative and relevant. So why is a search for "Jew" different? One reason is that the word "Jew" is often used in an anti-Semitic context>>> is provably FALSE, and ironically is PROVEN TO BE FALSE by Google’s very own software. On the following graph produced by Google Trends, the blue lines represent “jew” while the red lines represent “jewish people”, and the top box is how people search the internet while the bottom box is news media coverage:
Even this news media which has NO coverage of “jewish crime” or “jewish murder” [but DOES talk about “black crime”] uses the word “jew” two to ten times more frequently than it uses the phrase “jewish people”, JUST as people who search the internet do. If you do this comparison yourself, you will find pertinent news articles containing the word “jew” on the right hand side of that graph AND YOU WILL PROVE TO YOURSELF THAT NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THOSE NEWS ARTICLES “used in an anti-Semitic context” THE WORD “JEW”.
We’re not speaking of a “difference of opinion” here. We’re talking about GOOGLE, while pretending to be unbiased, claims that using the word “jew” is disparaging to jews—WHEN YOU SIMPLY CANNOT PRODUCE EVEN ONE “MAINSTREAM NEWS” ARTICLE WHICH DOES THAT.
This is not OUR word. This is THEIR word. WE do not claim to be jews—THE EDOMITES WHO RUN OUR “NEWS” MEDIA CLAIM TO BE JEWS. If this is a disparaging phrase to jews—BLAME IT ON JEWS, NOT AMERICANS.
For your own edification, use Google Trends to compare “jews” to jewish people” and see for yourself what THAT produces.
What can we say? GOOGLE IS A PACK OF LIARS, and nothing less!!!
EMPIRE VAMPIRE Tattler]
Close Ranks Spiritually - Spread Out Tactically
~ Find the Enemie's Agents ~
bits of wisdom from:
Stepping through the Minefields:
notes from: Wisdom of the Armchair General
~ by cyber Tacticus
Search engine company has long been in bed
with intelligence network
Steve Watson, March 31, 2008
Google is supplying the software, hardware and tech support
to US intelligence agencies who are in the process
of creating a vast closed source database
for global spy networks to share information.
Google is selling storage and data searching equipment
to the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency,
and other intelligence agencies, who have come together
to build a huge internal government intranet.
Google is also providing the search features
for a private Wikipedia-style site, called Intellipedia.
"We are a very small group, and even a lot of people
in the federal government don't know that we exist,"
said Mike Bradshaw, who leads Google's federal government
sales team and its 18 employees,
yesterday to the San Francisco Chronicle.
The government supply arm of Google has also reportedly
entered into a number of other contracts,
details of which it says it cannot share.
Google's partnership with the
intelligence network is not new.
As we reported in late 2006,
An ex-CIA agent Robert David Steele has claimed sources told him
that CIA seed money helped get the company off the ground
Speaking to the Alex Jones Show,
Steele elaborated on previous revelations
by making it known that the CIA
helped bankroll Google at its very inception.
Steele named Google's CIA point man as Dr. Rick Steinheiser,
of the Office of Research and Development.
"I think Google took money from the CIA when it was poor
and it was starting up and unfortunately
our system right now floods money into spying
and other illegal and largely unethical activities,
and it doesn't fund what I call the open source world," said Steele,
citing "trusted individuals" as his sources for the claim.
"They've been together for quite a while," added Steele.
Late last year, new programs of internet monitoring
were announced by a freshly created department branch
of Homeland Security called the National Applications Office
"Mr. Chertoff also plans soon to unveil a cyber-security strategy,
part of an estimated $15 billion, multiyear program
designed to protect the nation's Internet infrastructure.
The program has been shrouded in secrecy for months and has
also prompted privacy concerns on Capitol Hill because it
involves government protection of domestic computer networks."
The Wall Street Journal wrote.
Essentially the program allows the DHS to regulate and control
access to the internet in the name of "protecting" national security.
The news came on the back of separate revelations
that another military spy agency, the NSA has increasing
control over SSL, now called Transport Layer Security,
the cryptographic protocol that provides secure
communications on the internet for web browsing, e-mail,
instant messaging, and other data transfers.
In other words the agency is capable of intercepting a
nd reading your emails and instant messages in real time.
Earlier this year came the announcement that
US National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell is
that would make the current debate on warrantless wiretaps
look like a "walk in the park".
The plan would mean giving the government the authority
to examine the content of any e-mail, file transfer or Web search.
Recently, the lawyer for an AT&T engineer has alleged that
"within two weeks of taking office, the Bush administration
was planning a comprehensive effort of spying on Americans”
That is BEFORE 9/11, before the nation was embroiled
in the freedom stripping exercise commonly known as the
"war on terror" had even begun.
Earlier this year, CNET reported that both Google and Microsoft
refused to say if they have provided users private data to the
feral govt. under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act -
- the warrantless wiretapping program.
We have also previously reported on a vast intelligence program,
being overseen by the FBI, which is to establish
a global biometric database known as "Server in the Sky"
that will collate and provide an "International Information Consortium"
with access to the biometric measurements
and personal information of citizens of the US, UK, Australia,
Canada and New Zealand in the name of fighting the "war on terror".
After 9/11 the work of 16 different intelligence agencies,
including the CIA and the giant National Security Agency,
which eavesdrops on international communications,
as well as the Energy Department and the Drug Enforcement
Administration was centralized under the office of the
Over decades we have witnessed the evolution of
We are now witnessing the centralization of this
Vast Control Grid Panopticon
beyond our own borders.