Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

Homicide Rates by State Decrease Exponentially as the White Population Increases

Take five minutes to complete the Poll on Exiling Blacks

State to state data for homicides and population by race enables us to calculate homicide rates of each race:

 Whites commit homicide at 0.2 to 0.7 per 100,000 population. Blacks commit homicide at 52 to 74 per 100,000 population. Hispanics commit homicide at 27 to 37 per 100,000 population.

Had the national homicide rate been equivalent to North Dakota's in 1995, there would have been only 526 homicides, which is 22,374 fewer than there were.

Had it been equivalent to Washington, DC's, there would have been 186,872 homicides, 163,972 more than there were.

Knowing only the percentage of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics is all that's required to calculate each state's homicide rate to within an amazing degree of accuracy.   For example, we know that Pennsylvania's population is 86.6% Whites, 9.7% Blacks, and 2.3% Hispanics, so their murder rate should be (0.866 x 0.7) + (.097 x 52) + (.023 x 27) = 0.6062 + 5.044 + 0.621 = 6.3 homicides per 100,000 population, very close to the rate reported by US Statistical Abstract of 5.9.  We also know that Vermont's population is 98.3% White, 0.3% Black, and 0.7% Hispanic, so their homicide rate should be (.983 x 0.7) + (.003 x 52) + (.007 x 27) = .6881 + 0.156 + 0.189 = 1.0 which is exactly what is reported in the Statistical Abstract.  California with 52.2% Whites, 7.6% Blacks, and 28.9% Hispanics has a high murder rate because of Hispanics rather than Blacks:  (.522 x .7) + (.076 x 52) + (.289 x 27) = .3654 + 3.952 + 7.803 = 12.1, which is within 3% of their official rate of 11.8.

What's incredibly misleading, and intentionally so, about the way the Bureau of Justice Statistics presents their data is the inclusion of Hispanics in the White category.  96% of the homicides attributed to "Whites" in California are committed by Hispanics, 89% in Florida are committed by Hispanics, 84% in Illinois, 87% in New Jersey, 90% in New York.  The few states where Whites commit more homicides than Hispanics are the states where there are almost no Hispanics.  Nationwide, 80% of all the homicides which are attributed to Whites are in reality committed by Hispanics.   And this is being generous to Blacks and Hispanics, because if we apply the above formula to North Dakota with 98.2% Whites, 0.5% Blacks, and .07% Hispanics, then our calculated rate of (.982 x .7) + (.005 x 52) + (.007 x 27) = 1.1 is more than FIVE TIMES (5x) HIGHER than their actual rate of 0.2.  Similarly, other states with a high percentage of Whites (like Iowa, Massachusetts, Nebraska, and Ohio) also have remarkably low murder rates.

Washington, DC's unique status of having the highest homicide rate and the lowest percentage of Whites provides an insight into what would happen if there were no Whites at all.  The following graph of homicide rates by state and percentage of Whites by states demonstrates that the homicide rate decreases exponentially as the percentage of Whites increases.

Conversely, it also enables us to estimate that the homicide rate of Blacks could exceed 160 per 100,000 Blacks if there were no Whites at all, which means that 52,800 of the 33 million Blacks in the country would be murdered each year were it not for Whites who created a stable culture for Blacks.   This is four times higher than their current rate, so 39,600 Black lives are saved each year because of laws established by Whites.

Because 80% of the crimes attributed to Whites in the following table from the BJS were actually committed by Hispanics and Latinos, the REAL difference in the propensity of Blacks to commit homicide compared to Whites [read: non-Hispanic and non-Latino Whites] is grossly under-estimated.  Of the 469 homicides in 1994 that the BJS reports as "White on Black", 399 were committed by Hispanics and only 70 were committed by Whites.  So where the BJS let you believe that Blacks killed only three times as many Whites as Whites killed Blacks in 1994, the FACT is that Blacks killed 18 times as many.  On a per capita basis, 3.9 Blacks per 100,000 Blacks killed Whites, whereas 0.036 Whites per 100,000 Whites killed Blacks, which means that Blacks are 108 times more likely to kill Whites as Whites are to kill Blacks--a simple fact that eludes the mediots of the country who have whined continually about a black felon named James Byrd killed by Whites two years ago, while not even able to stumble across the stories about the 12 Whites who were murdered by Blacks yesterday, or the 12 the day before that, or the day before that, or ...

Isn't this the definition of genocide?

```Bureau of Justice Statistics
Homicide trends in the United States
www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide
```
```Racial composition of offender and victim for homicide
```
```Percent of all homicides
White on   Black on Other on White on Black on Other on White on Black on Other on
Year       White      White    White    Black    Black    Black    Other    Other    Other
1976       43.5%     6.0%     0.3%     2.0%    47.5%     0.0%     0.2%     0.1%     0.4%
1977       44.6%     5.9%     0.4%     2.4%    45.8%     0.1%     0.3%     0.1%     0.5%
1978       46.3%     6.1%     0.3%     1.8%    44.8%     0.0%     0.3%     0.0%     0.3%
1979       46.0%     6.8%     0.4%     2.5%    43.7%     0.0%     0.2%     0.1%     0.4%
1980       46.8%     6.4%     0.3%     2.2%    43.6%     0.0%     0.2%     0.1%     0.4%
1981       46.8%     6.8%     0.2%     2.5%    43.0%     0.0%     0.2%     0.1%     0.4%
1982       48.1%     6.4%     0.3%     2.5%    41.7%     0.0%     0.3%     0.1%     0.5%
1983       48.7%     6.3%     0.3%     2.3%    41.6%     0.0%     0.3%     0.1%     0.5%
1984       50.3%     6.2%     0.3%     2.6%    39.8%     0.0%     0.3%     0.1%     0.5%
1985       49.7%     6.7%     0.3%     2.7%    39.8%     0.0%     0.2%     0.1%     0.5%
1986       47.1%     6.5%     0.4%     2.6%    42.6%     0.1%     0.3%     0.0%     0.6%
1987       47.3%     6.3%     0.4%     2.9%    42.2%     0.1%     0.2%     0.1%     0.5%
1988       44.9%     6.6%     0.4%     2.7%    44.5%     0.1%     0.3%     0.0%     0.4%
1989       43.9%     7.0%     0.3%     3.1%    44.8%     0.0%     0.3%     0.0%     0.5%
1990       44.1%     6.9%     0.3%     3.2%    44.8%     0.0%     0.3%     0.1%     0.4%
1991       41.5%     7.7%     0.3%     3.4%    46.3%     0.0%     0.3%     0.1%     0.4%
1992       41.7%     8.5%     0.3%     2.7%    46.1%     0.0%     0.2%     0.1%     0.4%
1993       41.1%     8.9%     0.3%     2.7%    46.2%     0.0%     0.2%     0.1%     0.4%
1994       41.1%     8.6%     0.4%     3.1%    46.1%     0.0%     0.3%     0.1%     0.3%
1995       43.8%     8.0%     0.4%     3.3%    43.6%     0.1%     0.3%     0.1%     0.5%
1996       43.8%     8.4%     0.4%     3.3%    43.4%     0.1%     0.3%     0.1%     0.3%
1997       43.4%     8.4%     0.3%     2.9%    44.0%     0.0%     0.2%     0.1%     0.6%
1998       46.4%     7.5%     0.3%     3.2%    41.6%     0.1%     0.3%     0.1%     0.5%
```
```
Number of homicides
White on   Black on Other on White on Black on Other on White on Black on Other on
Year       White      White    White    Black    Black    Black    Other    Other    Other
1976       6279      862       44      290     6855        2       29       12       59
1977       6299      828       52      346     6469        7       36       10       71
1978       6776      899       40      269     6547        5       37        5       48
1979       7054     1037       54      390     6706        4       31       10       64
1980       7384     1011       42      343     6886        7       34        9       67
1981       7588     1106       37      402     6972        8       33       11       71
1982       7183      960       44      377     6227        3       44       12       79
1983       6719      869       41      314     5739        3       38        8       68
1984       6664      816       42      341     5264        3       36        9       63
1985       6744      913       43      361     5402        5       27       12       65
1986       6896      949       54      378     6235        7       41        6       88
1987       6574      873       49      408     5861        8       35       10       70
1988       6362      939       62      389     6312        8       40        7       58
1989       6450     1029       50      457     6583        2       42        5       75
1990       6984     1089       43      502     7091        2       42        9       69
1991       6611     1220       54      541     7361        5       51       15       56
1992       6241     1272       40      410     6903        4       35       17       63
1993       6466     1393       46      432     7268        7       32       16       57
1994       6208     1306       56      469     6960        4       42       13       52
1995       6043     1110       51      454     6020        8       37       17       72
1996       5602     1077       49      417     5551       13       32       17       41
1997       5056      974       34      343     5119        5       28       17       70
1998       5188      839       36      362     4653        8       29       12       56
```
```Source: FBI, Supplementary Homicide Reports, 1976-98.
the Data for weighting and imputation procedures used.              ```

 Homicide Rate per 100,000 population, by state, US Statistical Abstract, 1994 1995 Population thousands 1995 Population Percent Esti mate = 0.6 Esti mate = 50 Esti mate = 25 Esti mate = 0.3 Total Esti mated Homi cides Homicides    per 100,000 population Total pop White Black Hisp/ Indn Asian White Black His panic Asian White Black Hisp/ Indn Asian Est Offi cial Diff Alabama 4,241 3,094 1,087 32 28 73.0% 25.6% 0.8% 0.7% 19 544 8 0 570 13.4 11.9 -1.5 Alaska 520 441 26 25 28 84.8% 5.0% 4.8% 5.4% 3 13 6 0 22 4.2 6.3 2.1 Arizona 4,030 2,936 146 868 80 72.9% 3.6% 21.5% 2.0% 18 73 217 0 308 7.6 10.5 2.9 Arkansas 2,472 2,036 394 27 15 82.4% 15.9% 1.1% 0.6% 12 197 7 0 216 8.7 12 3.3 California 31,877 16,630 2,414 9,206 3,627 52.2% 7.6% 28.9% 11.4% 100 1,207 2,302 11 3,619 11.4 11.8 0.4 Colorado 3,742 2,989 164 507 82 79.9% 4.4% 13.5% 2.2% 18 82 127 0 227 6.1 5.4 -0.7 Connecticut. 3,300 2,685 300 248 67 81.4% 9.1% 7.5% 2.0% 16 150 62 0 228 6.9 6.6 -0.3 Delaware 715 553 131 19 12 77.3% 18.3% 2.7% 1.7% 3 66 5 0 74 10.3 4.7 -5.6 Wash D.C. 562 156 352 37 17 27.8% 62.6% 6.6% 3.0% 1 176 9 0 186 33.1 71 Florida. 14,261 10,010 2,078 1,955 218 70.2% 14.6% 13.7% 1.5% 60 1,039 489 1 1,588 11.1 8.3 -2.8 Georgia. 7,207 4,926 2,019 150 112 68.4% 28.0% 2.1% 1.6% 30 1,010 38 0 1,077 14.9 10 -4.9 Hawaii 1,238 354 29 100 755 28.6% 2.3% 8.1% 61.0% 2 15 25 2 44 3.5 4.2 0.7 Idaho. 1,154 1,063 6 72 13 92.1% 0.5% 6.2% 1.1% 6 3 18 0 27 2.4 3.5 1.1 Illinois 11,876 8,615 1,813 1,090 358 72.5% 15.3% 9.2% 3.0% 52 907 273 1 1,232 10.4 11.7 1.3 Indiana. 5,799 5,161 471 119 48 89.0% 8.1% 2.1% 0.8% 31 236 30 0 296 5.1 7.9 2.8 Iowa 2,840 2,704 56 46 34 95.2% 2.0% 1.6% 1.2% 16 28 12 0 56 2.0 1.7 -0.3 Kansas 2,554 2,241 158 114 41 87.7% 6.2% 4.5% 1.6% 13 79 29 0 121 4.7 5.8 1.1 Kentucky 3,857 3,532 274 27 24 91.6% 7.1% 0.7% 0.6% 21 137 7 0 165 4.3 6.4 2.1 Louisiana. 4,340 2,800 1,382 105 53 64.5% 31.8% 2.4% 1.2% 17 691 26 0 734 16.9 19.8 2.9 Maine. 1,235 1,216 5 6 8 98.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 7 3 2 0 11 0.9 2.3 1.4 Maryland 5,061 3,357 1,347 172 185 66.3% 26.6% 3.4% 3.7% 20 674 43 1 737 14.6 11.6 -3.0 Mass. 6,140 5,222 373 355 190 85.0% 6.1% 5.8% 3.1% 31 187 89 1 307 5.0 3.5 -1.5 Michigan 9,518 7,774 1,379 233 132 81.7% 14.5% 2.4% 1.4% 47 690 58 0 795 8.4 9.8 1.4 Minnesota 4,560 4,254 127 73 106 93.3% 2.8% 1.6% 2.3% 26 64 18 0 108 2.4 3.2 0.8 Mississippi 2,690 1,687 968 19 16 62.7% 36.0% 0.7% 0.6% 10 484 5 0 499 18.5 15.3 -3.2 Missouri 5,310 4,593 589 74 54 86.5% 11.1% 1.4% 1.0% 28 295 19 0 341 6.4 10.5 4.1 Montana 820 796 3 16 5 97.1% 0.4% 2.0% 0.6% 5 2 4 0 10 1.3 3.3 2.0 Nebraska 1,627 1,496 64 50 17 91.9% 3.9% 3.1% 1.0% 9 32 13 0 54 3.3 3.1 -0.2 Nevada 1,521 1,159 109 192 61 76.2% 7.2% 12.6% 4.0% 7 55 48 0 110 7.2 11.7 4.5 New Hampshire 1,147 1,115 8 13 11 97.2% 0.7% 1.1% 1.0% 7 4 3 0 14 1.2 1.4 0.2 New Jersey 8,056 5,636 1,151 896 373 70.0% 14.3% 11.1% 4.6% 34 576 224 1 834 10.4 5 -5.4 New Mexico 1,558 839 41 657 21 53.9% 2.6% 42.2% 1.3% 5 21 164 0 190 12.2 10.7 -1.5 New York 18,682 12,082 3,192 2,541 867 64.7% 17.1% 13.6% 4.6% 72 1,596 635 3 2,306 12.3 11.1 -1.2 North Carolina 7,122 5,350 1,598 100 74 75.1% 22.4% 1.4% 1.0% 32 799 25 0 856 12.0 10.9 -1.1 North Dakota 610 599 3 4 4 98.2% 0.5% 0.7% 0.7% 4 2 1 0 6 1.0 0.2 -0.8 Ohio 11,149 9,622 1,250 162 115 86.3% 11.2% 1.5% 1.0% 58 625 41 0 724 6.5 6 -0.5 Oklahoma 3,027 2,624 257 104 42 86.7% 8.5% 3.4% 1.4% 16 129 26 0 170 5.6 6.9 1.3 Oregon 3,108 2,810 56 150 92 90.4% 1.8% 4.8% 3.0% 17 28 38 0 83 2.7 4.9 2.2 Pennsylvania 12,099 10,474 1,168 279 178 86.6% 9.7% 2.3% 1.5% 63 584 70 1 717 5.9 5.9 0.0 Rhode Island 998 868 48 60 22 87.0% 4.8% 6.0% 2.2% 5 24 15 0 44 4.4 4.1 -0.3 South Carolina 3,671 2,503 1,103 36 29 68.2% 30.0% 1.0% 0.8% 15 552 9 0 576 15.7 9.6 -6.1 South Dakota 676 662 3 7 4 97.9% 0.4% 1.0% 0.6% 4 2 2 0 7 1.1 1.4 0.3 Tennessee 5,250 4,308 853 45 44 82.1% 16.2% 0.9% 0.8% 26 427 11 0 464 8.8 9.3 0.5 Texas. 18,808 10,891 2,292 5,173 452 57.9% 12.2% 27.5% 2.4% 65 1,146 1,293 1 2,506 13.3 11 -2.3 Utah 1,932 1,758 18 110 46 91.0% 0.9% 5.7% 2.4% 11 9 28 0 47 2.4 2.9 0.5 Vermont. 582 572 2 4 4 98.3% 0.3% 0.7% 0.7% 3 1 1 0 5 0.9 1 0.1 Virginia 6,628 4,909 1,298 209 212 74.1% 19.6% 3.2% 3.2% 29 649 52 1 731 11.0 8.7 -2.3 Washington 5,368 4,616 180 284 288 86.0% 3.4% 5.3% 5.4% 28 90 71 1 190 3.5 5.5 2.0 W. Virginia 1,825 1,750 57 9 9 95.9% 3.1% 0.5% 0.5% 11 29 2 0 41 2.3 5.4 3.1 Wisconsin 5,087 4,617 283 114 73 90.8% 5.6% 2.2% 1.4% 28 142 29 0 198 3.9 4.5 0.6 Wyoming 469 436 3 27 3 93.0% 0.6% 5.8% 0.6% 3 2 7 0 11 2.3 3.4 1.1 % of pop 100% 73.6 12.6 10.2 3.6 Calculated (1m) 262.9 193.5 33.1 26.9 9.3 1,161 16,564 6,730 28 24,483 7.5 8.3 0.0 Official figures 262.8 194.5 36.4 35.3 10.2 23,700

 Population by race in each state is at http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/dp1/2khus.pdf Murder rates by state are at http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-us.html See also Table No. 138 at http://www.census.gov/prod/3/98pubs/98statab/sasec2.pdf

This state by state data proves what the FBI doesn't want us to know--each and every state with the highest murder rates also has the highest percentage of blacks and Latinos, and each and every state with the lowest murder rate has the highest percentage of Whites.

States with murder rates greater than 10 per 100,000 population are the ones with the lowest percentage of Whites: Alabama 11.9 and 73%, Arizona 10.5 and 72.9%, California 11.8 and 52%, Georgia 10.0 and 68.4%, Illinois 11.7 and 72.5%, Louisiana 19.8 and 64.5%, Maryland 11.6 and 66.3%, Mississippi 15.3 and 62.7%, New Mexico 10.7 and 54%, New York 11.1 and 64.7%, North Carolina 10.9 and 75.1%, and Texas 11 and 58%.

States with murder rates lower than 3 are the ones with the greatest percentage of Whites:  Iowa 1.7 and 95.2%, Maine 2.3 and 98.5%, New Hampshire 1.4 and 97.2%, North Dakota 0.2 and 98.2%, South Dakota 1.4 and 97.9%, Utah 2.9 and 91%, and Vermont 1 and 98.3%.

Washington, DC's incredibly high murder rate of 71 proves that it's a country of its own with little resemblance to the rest of America, not just in murders but in all aspects of social pathology.  It also proves that the absence of Whites causes blacks to commit murder at a rate higher than they do in the company of Whites, giving us an opportunity to calculate the rate at which blacks commit murder in our capitol city:

(0.278 x 0.2) + (0.626 x X) + (0.66 x X/2) + (0.03 x 0.2) = 71

0.556 + 0.626X + 0.33X + 0.006 = 71

X = 73.4 = rate at which blacks in Washington DC commit murder

X/2 = 36.7 = rate at which Hispanics in Washington DC commit murder

Let's test these figures by estimating what the murder rate in Texas SHOULD be based on its racial composition, and compare it to what the state reports it to be:

(0.579 x 0.2) + (0.122 x 73.4) + (.275 x 36.7) + (.024 x 0.2) =

0.1158 + 8.9458 + 36.975 + 0.0048 = 46.04

The actual murder rate in Texas is "only" 11, so our estimate for Washington, DC with a low percentage of Whites does not apply to Texas with a majority of Whites.   Here's the calculation for blacks and Latinos in Texas:

(0.579 x 0.2) + (0.122 x X) + (.275 x X/2) + (.024 x 0.2) = 11

0.1158 + .122X + .1375X + .0048 = 11

X = 41.9 = murder rate for blacks in Texas

X/2 = 21 = murder rate for Latinos in Texas

And for Lousiana:

(0.645 x 0.2) + (.318X) +(.024 x X/2) + (.012 x 0.2) = 19.8

.129 + .318X + .012X + .0024 = 19.8

X = 59.6 = murder rate for blacks in Louisiana

X/2 = 30 = murder rate for Latinos in Louisiana

IF [note big if] blacks in North Dakota commit murder at the rate of 1 murder per 1,362 blacks,  their murder rate in DC, THEN [note big then] the 3,400 blacks in North Dakota in 1995 would have commited 2 or 3 murders that year.  IF [note big if] blacks in North Dakota commit murder at the rate of 1 murder per 2,387 blacks, their murder rate in Texas, THEN [note big then] the 3,400 blacks in North Dakota in 1995 would have commited 1 or 2 murders that year.

But North Dakota's murder rate that year [Table No. 143] was 0.2 per 100,000 population, which was only 2 murders.  In this event, blacks would have committed 1 to 3 murders and non-blacks 0.

BUT--IF [note big if] the 0.7% of North Dakota's population who are Hispanics, or 4,270 of them, commit homicide at the same rate as in Louisiana, THEN [note big then] they would have commited 1 or 2 of those homicides, leaving 0 commited by non-blacks and non-Hispanics.

And IF [note big if] the 4,125 Indians in North Dakota committed homicide at the same rate as Hispanics (a strong probability), then they would have committed 1 or 2 of these murders, leaving ZERO of these murders committed by--dah, dah--HONKIES.

NETSCAPE SCREEN NAME hawaiial1pro Posted Oct-2 10:18 PM

As if though to underscore the point, here's how an "American" black hawaiial1pro attempted to prove that blacks aren't responsible for the majority of the violence in this nation:

"I've had it.  I'm angry as hell that people in this country that is supposed to be the land of the brave and home of the free are as ignorant as I have experienced reading some of the comments put forth in this site.  Most notably the comments from a so-called human being named "John Knight" and something called "Dana".  It is people like you that cause blacks and others to really give some serious consideration to take people like you out and in the most horrible way possible end your miserable lives.  This goes for not only you but the idiot currently in the oval office and his whole administration for what they have done not only to this country but to the world as a whole."

"Your reply only goes to show how  utterly stupid you are.  I won't even lower myself any further trying to reason with a moron who can not even spell.  You really ought to just end your own life; anyone who has as much hate in them as you seem to have is already dead..."

Certainly the irony is lost on him that he would promote violence "in the most horrible way possible end your miserable lives" against the very people who most vociferously advocate the reduction of violence--by removing our nation's capitol from its long running top spot as the "Murder Capitol of the World".

We couldn't have asked for a better example for why American blacks continue to commit the vast majority of the nation's violent crimes, deny that they do, insult, threaten, and intimidate all who dare make this VALID observation, pretend that they really Do think that being the Murder Capitol of the World is no problem and that blacks who constitute up to 80 of the population in DC were simply innocent bystanders--then stick their head back in the.. ...!

 Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017 Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party