Free news

FREE blog







Gun poll








14th Amdt

19th Amdt













Sodomites or "Homosexuals"

But I tell you that it will be more bearable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for you, Matthew 11:24

There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel. Deuteronomy 23:17

And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel. 1Kings 14:24

They die in youth, and their life is among the sodomites. Job 36:14

`And a man who lieth with a male as one lieth with a woman; abomination both of them have done; they are certainly put to death; their blood is on them. Lev 20:13

"The Netherlands is the only country in the world that permits same-sex couples to marry. The law, which went into effect April 1, 2001, eliminates all references to gender in laws governing matrimony, divorce, and adoption"

New Yorkers, the direct beneficiaries of 911, fail to heed God's Warning Shot:  "New York City passed a gay-rights measure in 1986.   New York would be the 13th state to enact a gay-rights law if the measure is signed by Pataki."

"Judaism does NOT forbid homosexuality -- as TORAH never mentions homosexuality. It does forbid homosexual 'sexual acts' as a religious act ... at pagan temples and male prostitution --all very common among the PAGAN tribes of the Middle East", R�ain, Tuesday, December 31, 2002 7:41 PM

In December 1973, the American Psychiatric Association's Board of
Trustees deleted homosexuality from its official nomenclature of

mental disorders, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental

Disorders, Second Edition (DSMII). The action was taken following a
review of the scientific literature and consultation with experts in
the field.



The Holy Bible condemns sodomy as a sin:


The Baptist and Methodist Churches axed churches which performed sodomite marriages.


The Catholic Church may be driven to bankruptcy for condoning sodomy.


Congress voted 362 for Boy Scouts and 12 for sodomites but our judges continued to try to "legalize" sodomy from the bench.


Thirty five states passed anti-sodomy laws by margins up to 70%:


As the Gallup Organization was the only polling organization to continue to report that only 44% opposed sodomy laws.


As New Yorkers remained twice as likely as the average citizen to condone sodomy.


As the jewsmedia LIES and claims that Americans condone sodomy, real jurors gave a sodomite a life sentence plus 108 years in prison).


Two thirds of respondents OPPOSE the "Supreme Court" decision to legalize sodomy in Texas.


Sodomy is a greater public health risk than smoking or drunk driving.


Approval of sodomy by our schools caused the rape of 74,000 high school boys.


Sodomy reduced the life expectancy of men by the equivalent of 2.7 million lives.


Jim Rudd:  sodomy is a crime.


Graphic description of sodomy [warning].


Christians and sodomy.


Sodomy is a religious rather than a political issue.


Degenerate Degeneras canned.


Sodomite Royce Buehler.


Most sodomites are jews.


Biblical history of the word "gay".


Sodomite Matthew Shepard.


By failing to heed public health warnings, sodomites risk extinction by their own behavior.


There's nothing that reveals the zeal and ability of zionists to destroy this Christian nation more brilliantly than the battle between 'we the people' and our own politicians in their attempt to impose "legalized" sodomy on our youth, coupled with the ability and willingness of "polling organizations" and other jewish controlled "news sources" to misrepresent American public opinion.  In 1991, where The General Social Survey showed that the percentage of Americans who viewed "gay sex as always wrong" was 71%, The Gallup Organization was reporting that only 48% believed homosexual relations should not be legal, a disconnect of serious proportions.

"On November 3, 1993, by a vote of 53.4% to 46.6%, the voters of the State of Colorado passed an initiated amendment to the Colorado Constitution referred to as Amendment 2. That amendment provides: No Protected Status Based on Homosexual, Lesbian, or Bisexual Orientation".  The courts struck it down, in violation of the will of 'we the people', due mostly to advocacy work by non-credible and irresponsible "polling" and "news" organizations like Gallup, who reported at that time that only 48% of the people they polled "think homosexual relations between consenting adults should not be legal".  More reputable polling organizations reported that "Seventy-four percent of Hawaii residents polled are opposed to same-sex marriage, and yet just four members of the Hawaii Senate were able to kill a constitutional amendment that had already passed the House of Representatives by a two-thirds majority. This action by four senators to prohibit Hawaii residents from voting has citizens outraged". This 26% disconnect between Gallup and reality was the beginning of the end for the credibility of formerly objective polling and news sources like Gallup.

The schism widened in 1996 when Gallup reported that opposition to legalizing sodomy was now down to 44%, yet "The federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) specifically states that the federal government will not recognize a same-sex relationship treated like a marriage. This means that, under the current law, parties to a civil union will not be able to qualify for any of the benefits and protections contained in the 1049 federal laws affecting the spousal relationship". "DOMA became Public Law 104-199 on September 21, 1996"

Encouraged by their previous failures, as most "liberals" always are, Gallup then reported in 1999 that opposition to legalized homosexual relations was down to a mere 43%.  But that was less than one year after "The electorate of Hawaii voted on November 4, 1998 to amend the state constitution to permit the legislature to ban same-gender marriage, effectively ending the possibility that marriage will be granted to same-gender couples in that state." "69% of voters approved a ballot initiative which changed the state constitution to allow the legislature to restrict marriage to heterosexual couples", meaning that Gallup was now under-reporting opposition to legalized homosexual relations by 26%. Was Hawaii some remarkable exception to the norm?  No.  "In Alaska the case for same-sex unions was weaker, but still a threat to traditional marriage. In February a lower court determined that denying homosexuals the right to marry violated the Alaska constitution. In response, 68% of voters approved a measure which amended the state's constitution to limit marriage to one man, one woman".  Gallup was again off by 25-26%, which in polling is much bigger than a mile.

False information from Gallup has now become legion.  Their report that the percentage of voters who favored the legalization of homosexual relations was now up to 50% encouraged the "liberal" California court to attempt to attempt to legalize "gay marriages".  Even a Field Poll conducted prior to the passage of Proposition 22 suggested that Gallup was not far off target, indicating that only 51% of Californians supported it.  Yet with all of the misinformation and false information, with Gallup proclaiming from the rafters that opposition to legalized sodomy was down to 43%, 63% of California voters still gave common sense and Christian principles a landslide victory on March 7, 2000 and passed this ballot initiative to BAN such marriages.  Vermont's courts attempted to do the same thing, and Vermont voters reacted by passing a similar initiative to ban same-sex marriages. In December 2000, "In Nebraska, unofficial election results indicate an anti-Gay ballot measure there passed by a margin of 70 percent to 30 percent among 640,310 voters. Initiative 416 calls for amending the state constitution so marriage is recognized only for heterosexual couples".  "In Nevada, unofficial election results indicate 589,865 residents there voted on a proposed anti-Gay ballot measure and approved it by a margin of 69.4 percent to 30.5 percent. The measure sought to amend the state constitution so that only a marriage between a man and a woman is legally recognized in that state". "In Maine, the Human Rights Campaign supported the efforts of the YES on 6 for Equal Rights Campaign. Question 6 gave voters the opportunity to enact a law banning discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in employment, housing and public accommodations. If it had passed, it would have marked the first time that voters had passed a state law to protect lesbian, gay and bisexual people. Voters in Washington state rejected a similar initiative several years ago after the Legislature passed a measure requiring a ballot vote".

Again, Gallup was off by a mile.   State after state after state proved that their biased sodomite polls under-represented opposition to "legalization of homosexual relations" by a minimum of 20%, all the way up to 27%.

Is Gallup "the gang that can't shoot straight", are they all faggots, or are they just so intent on destroying this Christian nation that they just can't permit a mere thing like facts to get in the way?  As if though 35 state initiatives to ban "gay marriages" isn't enough to get the message across to these despicable "liberals", they then attempted to change the wording to "civil unions", JUST in order to attempt to side step the restriction on "gay marriages" implemented by 'we the people' in legitimate public mandates.  Such weasel wording will be met with the same resolve that the immoral supporters of affirmative action met, no matter how disconnected from reality "polling organizations" like Gallup get.

None of the organizations which pride themselves on being objective pollsters were even close to reality.  The Pascoe Poll showed 56% of voters opposed "gay marriages", which was the closest to reality, but no state's initiative passed by less than 63% and the average was closer to 70%.   Environics poll was even further off the mark than Gallup, and actual public opinion against legalized sodomy exceeded Gallup's estimate by almost two thirds.

Is it really this difficult to get more accurate polling results than this?  Absolutely not.  NORC managed to break down American public opinion by all kinds of racial, age, and sex categories several decades ago, and even now their results were the closest to the actual vote counts.  Has public opinion changed since NORC conducted their survey in 1985-1989?  Not likely.  Their survey showed that 69-70% of the voting age group between 25 to 44 opposed same sex relationships, which is exactly how the voters of each state voted.

State and Federal Referendums:


35 states have marriage recognition statutes.


Focus On The Family reports 35 states have already passed DOMA laws.


The "wiberals" at ABC News: "The drive for gay marriage has prompted a clear backlash. The federal government and 30 states have adopted laws to ensure they will not have to recognize same-sex unions."


The even more "wiberal": "Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance: "As of early 2002, about 25 states have enacted 'Defense of Marriage Acts' (DOMAs) that ban same-sex marriage. Another six have similar legislation pending. During 2000-MAR, 61% of California voters supported Proposition 22, which defined marriage as being restricted to between one man and one woman."

Sodomy polls:


The WorldnetDaily poll confirmed that less than 6% think gays should be included in the GOP, and less than 1% favor "gay" marriages.


The Be Counted poll confirmed that only 9% believe that "homosexual" marriages [read: sodomy] should be given the same legal standing as heterosexual marriages".


The General Social Survey reports that 71% believe that "gay sex is always wrong", up from only 67% in 1977.


The Statistical Handbook of the American Family: 86% believe that sodomy is "always wrong" or "almost always wrong". 


New York Magazine: 66% OPPOSE the legalization of sodomite "marriages".


Two thirds of Californians vote to BAN sodomy.


Two thirds of Hawaiian and Alaskan voters ban sodomite "marriages", the only two states in which courts have held that same-sex couples have a right to "marry," voters in both states in November overwhelmingly passed state constitutional amendments to reserve the legal status of marriage to unions between one man and one woman.


Vermont lawmakers who supported sodomy get the BIG FAT BOOT!!


Field Poll:  55% favor initiatives to BAN sodomy.

bullet  53% favor an Constitutional Amendment to BAN "gay marriages" [read: illegal, amoral, and sinful sodomy], and 68% oppose "gay marriages".


Howard W. Odum Survey:   71.6% in Kentucky oppose legalization of sodomy.


Pascoe Poll:  only a third of Vermont's voters want sodomy "legalized".


Harris Poll:  83% oppose same-sex marriage.

bullet 72% oppose same sex marriage.


The biased Gallup Organization asked the wrong questions and got the  "right" answers:   83% believe sodomites should have "equal rights".


Gay forum:  only 48% of gays want to boycott the Salvation Army for upholding Christian principles.


Decision Research: 49% of California voters oppose "same-sex marriages".


Salvation Army rescinds "domestic partner benefits".


Churches give sodomites the boot.


American jewish Committee:   87% of jews want sodomy legalized.

Canadian sodomy polls & opinions:


Only 40% of Canadians agree "gay marriages" should be recognized.


Only 28% of Canadians want to let sodomites into the ministry.


"a 1988 survey of first-year college students under 25 indicated that 98% were heterosexual; 1% bisexual; and 1% homosexual. (Source: King, et al. Canada, Youth and AIDS Study, Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University.)"

bulletJustices Affirm Ban on Homosexual Conduct at Christian University British Columbia College of Teachers must accredit Trinity Western University, says Canada's Supreme Court.

sodomypolls.gif (38638 bytes)


sodomy.gif (19951 bytes)

Only 10% believes that it is "not wrong at all". Only 1% profess to be "gay", and 3% of those who have committed sodomy report that it was "against their will".  The Gallup Organization reveals the left wing [read: jewish] agenda of that organization when, rather than asking whether or not existing laws against sodomy should be upheld or whether or not Christians who follow the Holy Bible have a right to free exercise of religion, asked:

As you may know, there has been considerable discussion in the news regarding the rights of homosexual men and women. In general, do you think homosexuals should or should not have equal rights in terms of job opportunities?

sodomy3.gif (3678 bytes)

Phrasing this as a question of "rights" in the work place is patently dishonest, but even so an increase from 56% to 83% on this question is not a good sign.  One of their other polls of parents about their children's schools found that 61% oppose "Teaching homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle" which is only slightly more honest, but far more in conformance with more respectable opinion sources like "The Statistical Handbook on the American Family" which found that 70% believe homosexuality is wrong.  But the final proof that Gallup is an advocacy organization rather than an objective polling organization is the following title to their March 10, 1999 poll on sodomy:

"Some Change Over Time in American Attitudes towards

Homosexuality, but Negativity Remains"

To the 70-83% of Americans who oppose the legalization of sodomy, it cannot be considered "negativity" to uphold existing laws against sodomy, particularly when sodomites have a 30 year shorter life expectancy than normal people, and when our public "schools" (which must be banned) have become bastions to promote sodomy.

sodomy2.gif (104563 bytes)


Main Entry: sod�omy
Pronunciation: 's�-d&-mE
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French sodomie, from Late Latin Sodoma Sodom; from the homosexual proclivities of the men of the city in Gen 19:1-11
Date: 13th century
1 : copulation with a member of the same sex or with an animal
2 : noncoital and especially anal or oral copulation with a member of the opposite sex
- sod�om�it�ic /"s�-d&-'mi-tik/ or sod�om�it�i�cal /-ti-k&l/ adjective


The "Gaying" of America
By Chuck Baldwin
March 20, 2001

A recent Reuters report declared, "More Americans Having Gay Sex, Study
Shows." The article stated, "Positive media images of gay life - like hit TV
shows 'Ellen' and 'Will and Grace' - may be helping spur an increase in gay
sexual activity among Americans, a new study suggests. A national survey has
found the percentage of US women who say they recently had gay sex has
increased 15-fold from 1988 to 1998, with rates among American men doubling
over the same period."

There is no "may be" about it: America has become a breeding ground for
aberrant sexual behavior. Homosexuality currently enjoys social acceptance
not seen since the days of Sodom and Gomorrah, or Pompeii. And there is
nothing on the horizon that suggests that the trend will deescalate anytime

The current generation of school children is being taught that sexual
perversion is normal, even healthy. Sodomy is not only acceptable; it is
fashionable. Many health "experts" today promote lesbianism as a means of
preventing unwed motherhood and teen pregnancy. They even suggest that
lesbian sex protects girls from acquiring Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD
's). Sex educators today promote the concept that homosexuals are born that
way and, therefore, the only way one can know for sure if they are gay or
not is to experiment with homosexuality.

Even our "conservative" Republican President has given an openly gay
activist a White House office. And rather than returning our military to the
pre-Clinton policies (policies that had been in place since George
Washington was Commander in Chief of our armed forces) that excluded
sodomites from military service, President Bush just last week declared that
his administration would "crack down" on homosexual "harassment" in the

It is also more than interesting that the man whom Bush selected to be our
ambassador to Canada is a man who superintended over one of America's most
liberal sex education programs, Massachusetts Governor, Paul Cellucci. Under
Cellucci's leadership, the state sex education program actually taught
14-year old children how to engage in homosexual sex. But by today's
standards of tolerance and diversity, this is hardly considered
inappropriate, even by "conservatives."

Adding to the politically correct acceptance of homosexuality is the fact
that many governmental agencies and major corporations offer insurance
benefits to these same-sex fornicators, thereby giving them the cultural
approbation that heretofore had been reserved for married couples. It is
also common for courts to routinely grant child custody to homosexuals. And
even many mainline Protestant churches perform same-sex "union" ceremonies,
trying to give the appearance of divine acceptance.

However, if history teaches us anything, it teaches us that any nation or
society that fully embraces aberrant sexual behavior has entered its final
days of existence. From the Canaanites to the Roman Empire, every culture
that openly accepted homosexuality has been destroyed. The United States
will not be the exception.

America will not be preserved by tax cuts or lower interest rates, but by a
national recommitment to the great moral principles given by God. In the
final analysis, America will be judged not by her politics or commercial
enterprise, but by her faith and fidelity.

horizontal rule

What the Bible says about Queers, in God's own Words         


 Romans 1:24-27 / Lev 20:13 / Lev 18:22 / 1Cor 6:9,10 / Deut 23:18 / 1Kings 14:24 / 1Kings 15:12 / Deut 22:5 /  Gen 19, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah / Romans 1:24-27 :

Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their earts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies to one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised. Amen. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lust. Even their women exchanged natural  relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abondoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another.   Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penality for their perversion.


Lev 20:13 : If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is destestable.  They must be put to death, their blood will be on their own heads.

Lev 18:22 : Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman, that is detestable.

1Cor 6:9,10 : Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God?  Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

Deut 23:18 :  You must not bring the earnings of a female prostitute nor a male prostitute into the house of the Lord to pay any vow,  because the Lord your God detest them both.

1Kings 14:24 :  There were even male shrine prostitutes in the land; the people engaged in all the detestable practices of the nations of Lord had driven out before the Israelities.

1Kings 15:12 : He expelled the male shrine prostitutes from the land and got rid of all the idols his fathers had made.

Deut 22:5 : A woman must not wear men's clothing, nor a man wear women's clothing, for the Lord your God detests anyone who does this.

Gen 19:1-11,24-29 : The Destruction of Sodom and Gomarrah The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city.   When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground. "My Lords," he said "please turn aside to your servant's house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on  your way early in the morning." "No," they answered, "we will spend the night in the square" But he insisted so strongly that they did go with im and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate.  Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom -  both young and old - surrounded the house. They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."  Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing. Look,  I have two daughters who have never slept with a man.  Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don't do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof." "Get out of our way," they replied.  And they said, "This fellow came here as an alien, and now he wants to play the judge! We'll treat you worse than them."  They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door. But the men inside resached out and pulled Lot back into the house and shut the door. Then they struck the men who were at the door of the house, young and old, with blindness so that they could not find the door.........(verse 24begins)  Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah -- from the Lord out of the heavens. Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, including all those living in the cities -- and also the vegetation in the land. But Lot's wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.  Early the next morning Abraham got up and returned to the place where he had stood before the Lord. He looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah, toward all the land of the plain, and he saw dense smoke rising from the land, like smoke from a furnance. So When God destoryed the cities of the plain, he remembered Abraham, and he brought Lot out of the catastrophe that overthrew the cities where Lot had lived.

horizontal rule

California penal code on sodomy

286.  (a) Sodomy is sexual conduct consisting of contact between the
penis of one person and the anus of another person.  Any sexual
penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the crime of
   (b) (1) Except as provided in Section 288, any person who
participates in an act of sodomy with another person who is under 18
years of age shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison,
or in a county jail for not more than one year.
   (2) Except as provided in Section 288, any person over the age of
21 years who participates in an act of sodomy with another person who
is under 16 years of age shall be guilty of a felony.
   (c) (1) Any person who participates in an act of sodomy with
another person who is under 14 years of age and more than 10 years
younger than he or she shall be punished by imprisonment in the state
prison for three, six, or eight years.
   (2) Any person who commits an act of sodomy when the act is
accomplished against the victim's will by means of force, violence,
duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on
the victim or another person shall be punished by imprisonment in the
state prison for three, six, or eight years.
   (3) Any person whom commits an act of sodomy where the act is
accomplished against the victim's will by threatening to retaliate in
the future against the victim or any other person, and there is a
reasonable possibility that the perpetrator will execute the threat
shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three, six,
or eight years.
   (d) Any person who, while voluntarily acting in concert with
another person, either personally or aiding and abetting that other
person, commits an act of sodomy when the act is accomplished against
the victim's will by means of force or fear of immediate and
unlawful bodily injury on the victim or another person or where the
act is accomplished against the victim's will by threatening to
retaliate in the future against the victim or any other person, and
there is a reasonable possibility that the perpetrator will execute
the threat shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for
five, seven, or nine years.
   (e) Any person who participates in an act of sodomy with any
person of any age while confined in any state prison, as defined in
Section 4504, or in any local detention facility, as defined in
Section 6031.4, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state
prison, or in a county jail for not more than one year.
   (f) Any person who commits an act of sodomy, and the victim is at
the time unconscious of the nature of the act and this is known to
the person committing the act, shall be punished by imprisonment in
the state prison for three, six, or eight years.  As used in this
subdivision, "unconscious of the nature of the act" means incapable
of resisting because the victim meets one of the following
   (1) Was unconscious or asleep.
   (2) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant that the act
   (3) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the
essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's fraud
in fact.
   (g) Except as provided in subdivision (h), a person who commits an
act of sodomy, and the victim is at the time incapable, because of a
mental disorder or developmental or physical disability, of giving
legal consent, and this is known or reasonably should be known to the
person committing the act, shall be punished by imprisonment in the
state prison for three, six, or eight years.  Notwithstanding the
existence of a conservatorship pursuant to the Lanterman-Petris-Short
Act (Part 1 (commencing with Section 5000) of Division 5 of the
Welfare and Institutions Code), the prosecuting attorney shall prove,
as an element of the crime, that a mental disorder or developmental
or physical disability rendered the alleged victim incapable of
giving consent.
   (h) Any person who commits an act of sodomy, and the victim is at
the time incapable, because of a mental disorder or developmental or
physical disability, of giving legal consent, and this is known or
reasonably should be known to the person committing the act, and both
the defendant and the victim are at the time confined in a state
hospital for the care and treatment of the mentally disordered or in
any other public or private facility for the care and treatment of
the mentally disordered approved by a county mental health director,
shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, or in a county
jail for not more than one year.  Notwithstanding the existence of a
conservatorship pursuant to the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Part 1
(commencing with Section 5000) of Division 5 of the Welfare and
Institutions Code), the prosecuting attorney shall prove, as an
element of the crime, that a mental disorder or developmental or
physical disability rendered the alleged victim incapable of giving
legal consent.
   (i) Any person who commits an act of sodomy, where the victim is
prevented from resisting by an intoxicating or anesthetic substance,
or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or
reasonably should have been known by the accused, shall be punished
by imprisonment in the state  prison for three, six, or eight years.    
   (j) Any person who commits an act of sodomy, where the victim
submits under the belief that the person committing the act is the
victim's spouse, and this belief is induced by any artifice,
pretense, or concealment practiced by the accused, with intent to
induce the belief, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state
prison for three, six, or eight years.
   (k) Any person who commits an act of sodomy, where the act is
accomplished against the victim's will by threatening to use the
authority of a public official to incarcerate, arrest, or deport the
victim or another, and the victim has a reasonable belief that the
perpetrator is a public official, shall be punished by imprisonment
in the state prison for three, six, or eight years.
   As used in this subdivision, "public official" means a person
employed by a governmental agency who has the authority, as part of
that position, to incarcerate, arrest, or deport another.  The
perpetrator does not actually have to be a public official.
   (l) As used in subdivisions (c) and (d), "threatening to retaliate"
means a threat to kidnap or falsely imprison, or inflict extreme
pain, serious bodily injury, or death.
   (m) In addition to any punishment imposed under this section, the
judge may assess a fine not to exceed seventy dollars ($70) against
any person who violates this section, with the proceeds of this fine
to be used in accordance with Section 1463.23.  The court, however,
shall take into consideration the defendant's ability to pay, and no
defendant shall be denied probation because of his or her inability
to pay the fine permitted under this subdivision.    

horizontal rule

1Co 6:9 2228 Know ye1492 not3756 that3754 the unrighteous94 shall2816 0 not3756 inherit2816 the kingdom932 of God2316? Be4105 0 not3361 deceived4105: neither3777 fornicators4205, nor3777 idolaters1496, nor3777 adulterers3432, nor3777 effeminate3120, nor3777 abusers of themselves with mankind733,

(1Co 6:9) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

(1Co 6:9) Or do you not know that unjust ones will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be led astray, neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor male prostitutes, nor homosexuals,


Strong's Concordance from Greek word 733 arsenokoites ar-sen-ok-oy'-tace from 730 and 2845; a sodomite:--abuser of (that defile) self with mankind.

Strong's Concordance from Greek word 3120 malakos mal-ak-os' of uncertain affinity; soft, i.e. fine (clothing); figuratively, a catamite:--effeminate, soft.

Webster's New World Dictionary:

  1. Catamite:  boy used in pederasty.
  2. Pederasty: sodomy between males, esp. as practiced by a man with a boy.
  3. sodomy \Sod"om*y\, n. [From Sodom. a country mentioned in the Bible: cf. F. sodomite.] Carnal copulation in a manner against nature; buggery. --Gen. xix. 5.

From The American Heritage� Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright � 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

cat�a�mite (kt-mt)
A boy who has a sexual relationship with a man.

[Latin catamtus, from Catamtus, Ganymede, from Etruscan Catmite, from Greek Ganumds.]

sod�om�y (sd-m)

Any of various forms of sexual intercourse held to be unnatural or abnormal, especially anal intercourse or bestiality.

[Middle English sodomie, from Old French, from Sodome Sodom, from Latin Sodoma, from Greek, from Hebrew sdm.]


From: "flygrl572001" <[email protected]>

Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 8:49 PM

Subject: [Ex_husband_now_my_slave] Re: HOW DARE YOU


From: "flygrl572001" <[email protected]>

Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 8:49 PM

Subject: [Ex_husband_now_my_slave] Re: HOW DARE YOU

> > He just dares to tell the truth. By the way are you telling us they
> > are half way become another Gay? So where all those carring Gay genes
> > go? they are not from you, so they can't carry your gay genes. But As
> > I said you are such a bad model for them and you just confirmed it.
> By the way who many breaks you have in one flight?
> LOL - well if i am such a bad model for them, then watch out little
> girls scouts - your leader is gay and now not only do I get to create
> my OWN little gay girls, but I get to transform a whole troop of kids.
> how many breaks do I get in one flight?  What do you mean?
> Susan

This was posted on another list and I think it is a classic skewer for those wishy washy namby pamby hanky wringing liberal foot stomping antinomian anti-Christ’s who have tolerated and even promoted this degeneracy in society for far too long. All/any names and source of this e-mail were removed for privacy reasons, per the prior expressed personal wishes of the author. Vaya Con Dios, Andy


At 03:28 PM 10/14/2004, wrote:


>Now, today, I am confused and bewildered about the whole homosexual issue.

Is this confusion due to the fact that a person seemed to be a better
person in your eyes after he was able to fulfill his desire to live as a

>It is FAR different when it hits job and family.

What's different?  The sin or your toleration of the sin?

>Being Christian does not mean I condem my beloved family member.  It means
>I love him and do not judge him.  I accept him unconditionally and will
>NEVER try to change him.

What if your family member were a confessed murderer or pedophile? Would
you not judge that person?  Do you think the love spoken of in the Bible is
dependant upon not judging?

>He used to be Christian and attended church faithfully.  Then his 'church'
>literally ran
>him off when they found out he was gay.  That was patently "UN" Christian.

Is it really?  It seems that the man Paul spoke of in 1 Cor 5:1, who was
having illegitimate sex, was a faithful church attender in
also.  But Paul demanded the church in
Corinth put away that wicked person
(1 Cor
5:13).  Was Paul being "UN" Christian?

>We as Christians are NOT to judge others.

  What do you do with Christ saying to judge righteously (John
7:24)?  Or
Paul's saying to: turn away from evil people (2 Tim 3:2-5), avoid those who
go contrary to doctrine (Rom 16:17), withdraw oneself from those that walk
not as he's been taught (2 Thes 3:6), have no company with one that refuses
to do as he was taught (2 Thes 3:14), count such a person as an enemy(2
Thes 3:7) and reject a person that refuses to repent of his sin (1 Tit
3:10)?  Or John's admonition to not receive one that strays from the truth
(2 John

>We are to love the person and hate the sin.

Where is that in the Scriptures?  Do you think the Bible is wrong where it
says God hates those that live in sin (Psalms 5:5)?

>  If I try to "change" him,

Do you really think you could change such a person?

>isn't that judging him as being wrong, sinful or an abomination?

Was Jesus, Paul and John wrong to say Christians should recognize evil
doers and avoid them?  Does not John say if you even bid such a one God
speed you're a partaker in that persons sins (2 John
1:11)?  Does not Paul
say to reprove those living in sin and to have no fellowship with them (Eph

>Never would I call someone I love an abomination.

Not even if God does?

>That is not for me to say as that is a judgment on my part.

How can you follow Christ's admonition to judge righteous judgment if you
don't judge?  Do you not think that God has already made the judgment on
sins, e.g., homosexuality?

>NOW, I wonder just how homosexuality can be considered a "sin" by God.

You can't understand how a vice that does not beget children, ends
ancestral lineages, spreads diseases, is consumed with self gratification
and causes very early death is a sin?  Remember the wages of sin is death
and the average male homosexual has about a 30 year less life span than a
heterosexual.  The homosexual way of existing is a death style.  It doesn't
continue bringing life into the world, spreads diseases that cause death
even to non-homosexuals (remember Kimberly Bergalis?) and shortens the
participants own life.  God's Law is life (Pro
6:23), not death.

>God created all peoples and NONE are perfect.

That's right and they are commanded to repent regardless of how they say
they are born.  Some pedophiles, alcoholics & murderers (serial killers)
say they were born that way.  Do you believe just being born a certain way
negates what God labels as sin?

>In spite of what the scripture says, I have to wonder at a God who would
>call a physical act, an abomination,

Do you call murder an abomination?  That's a physical act!

>IF it is done between two consenting adults.

So do you think it was OK for Jack Kevorkian to murder all those
consenting adults?

>  While I do think the homosexuality lifestyle is not conducive to a
> harmonious life, I now know of two separate instances where there are two
> homosexual couples who are happily committed to each other, long term,
> and without complication from being homosexual".

Does that make sin any less a sin?  And how do you know this?  They told
you or you heard it?  Just because you think people are happy doing things
that God calls wrong, what does that prove?  Didn't Christ say men love
darkness because their deeds are evil (John
3:19).  Being happy in sin is
nothing new.  The carnal mind is not subject to God's Law (Rom 8:7).

>The Christian in me recoils at homosexuality because I've been conditioned
>to regard it as revolting, by scripture.

Considering the make up of the male and female body and the purposes they
were created for, do you think same sex relationships are natural?  If not,
can you say you don't recoil at the thought of homosexuality because of the
Law of God on your heart?

>The LOVE in me is blind, and refuses to see the "sin".

Perhaps you've been conditioned by the media to believe such a thing?

>I love the person anyway.

What is love?

>Is this not what Jesus wants us to do and be?

God's word said to love good and hate evil (Rom 12:9).

> Loving and non-judgmental?

Do you think these two conditions can co-exist per the Bible?

>Aren't we supposed to love our neighbor as we love ourselves?

Yes!  That's what God told the Israelites (Lev
19:18) just before He told
them to put homosexuals to death (Lev






jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition


Hit Counter


Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party