Illegal Immigration

xmas3.gif (5351 bytes)

Immigration

IN VIOLATON OF THEIR OATH OF OFFICE

By Frosty Wooldridge
November 15, 2004
NewsWithViews.com

This year, over three million illegal aliens crossed over our borders against the laws set forth in our Constitution and Federal immigration mandates. These laws are specific. They demand arrest and deportation for anyone within the United States of America without lawful entry. For anyone hiring an illegal alien, these laws provide fines of $10,000.00 per illegal hired and up to five years in prison.

Nonetheless, according to Time Magazine, September 12, 2004, written by Pulitzer Prize winning journalists Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele--over 4,000 illegal aliens breach Arizona’s borders nightly. That is, "Enough to fill 22,000 Boeing 737 airliners or 60 flights every day of the year."

Millions of these illegal aliens find employment with our top corporations in every sector of our society—all the detriment of America’s working class—and in violation of the rule of law.

Yet Tom Ridge of Homeland Security, Asa Hutchinson head of the Border Patrol, our Congress and the president refuse to uphold the Constitution, its laws and their oaths of office. Additionally, our elected officials from mayors to state governors work against American citizens in what history will report as the single greatest ‘invasion-without-guns’ takeover of a nation in history.

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion." Article IV Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution.

Each of these elected men and women swore on a Bible to represent Americans and uphold the Constitution. Today, the majority of these elected officials are in violation of their oath of office. Beyond this violation, with severe consequences for their law abiding U.S. citizen constituents—is the poor example they set-absence of honor and legality.

According to Webster’s dictionary, fifteen million illegal aliens constitute an invasion. You can see the effects of this invasion in every city in the United States.

Nonetheless, mayors in dozens of cities including Miami, Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, Miami, Detroit and Boston maintain Special Order 40 that prohibits police from arresting and detaining illegal aliens. Hundreds of mayors are in violation of their oaths of office when they swore to uphold the rule of law.

Baldacci of Maine is the first governor to sign an order giving illegal aliens a sanctuary state. The cornucopia of benefits include the ability to work illegally, ability to drive without license or car insurance, use of welfare, use our schools with free lunches for their kids and state funded medical care—at our expense. This is the type of corrupt leadership found in the Third World. Baldacci violates his oath of office. However, he is not alone. Not one single governor in the United States stands against illegal immigration or attempts to enforce Federal or local laws in our states. They, in fact, aid, abet and assist illegal aliens. What law do they break?

"A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he: assists an illegal alien she/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or encourages that illegal alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions." Federal Law—Section 8 USC 1324.

If you suffered a horde of people overrunning your home or community, you would call the cops and have them arrested. Not so with illegal aliens! By lack of law enforcement, illegals recognize the open invitation to illegal entry. The benefits of lawbreaking exceed their wildest dreams.

Congressman Chris Cannon of Utah openly advocates for illegal alien migrants with his support of amnesty for illegals, Dream Act, Ag Bill and outright invitation to break the law. He requested for political contributions from illegal aliens during his campaign for Congress this year. He was celebrated by the Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund, which is one of the most anti-American, pro illegal alien organizations in America. To show you HOW out of touch with reality he is, I interviewed him by phone and he said the United States could hold at least a billion people. That is his plank—to grow the USA into one billion people. This shows his lack of knowledge of carrying capacity or what any farmer knows as the Tragedy of the Commons. The man lacks the collective intelligence of a patch of geraniums.

Congressman David Dreier of California and Nancy Pelosi follow Cannon’s path. Congressman Baca subverts the U.S. Border Patrol from doing its job. Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah won’t uphold our immigration laws, but he supports the Dream Act, which helps illegals with our tax money. Senator John McCain and Kyle of Arizona along with Congressmen Kolbe and Flake are SO out of touch with their constituents, they opposed Proposition 200 which was passed in that illegal-alien-invaded state.

They were the reasons Arizona citizens created the initiative because those elected officials refused their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution. Arizona endures 500,000 illegal aliens. Last year, with 77 hospitals near bankruptcy in the Border States, Senator McCain, instead of doing his job, slipped a $1.4 billion rider onto the Federal Medicaid Bill to keep those hospitals afloat. Why were they bankrupting? They served millions of non-paying illegal aliens. That money wasn’t enough. Four Los Angeles hospitals failed this year. Why? They could not function with thousands of illegal aliens. Who suffers? American citizens who cannot find hospital care.

A similar story could be written about Teddy Kennedy, Congressman Mark Udall and Diana Degette and Senators Allard and Campbell of Colorado, Dillion of Illinois, and hundreds of senators and representatives who will not and do not uphold their oath of office. John Tierney, John Conyers, Hillary Clinton, Benjamin Cardin and the list goes on and on where these representatives score F- on their www.numbersusa.com report cards.

How bad is your senator or congressman? Go to that site and find out. You will be appalled. Then you’ll get REALLY angry.

Within two weeks of his re-election, President Bush pushes for amnesty for 15 million illegal aliens after he’s the one whose been letting them into our country without pause for the past four years! He violates his oath of office.

What is it doing to America? For starters, Miami, Florida is no longer an American city. The Cubans retain allegiance to Cuba while living off the American taxpayer. They insult you if you speak English in Miami—it’s THAT racist down there. Over 800,000 Americans fled California last year because LA became a clone of Mexico City replete with the 20,000 member "18th Street Gang" made up of 60 percent illegal aliens. They distribute 75 percent of drugs at $120 billion coming from Mexico annually. Fremont, California is now known as ‘Little Kabul’ because it is an enclave of the Middle East. English is not spoken in much of California. Detroit looks more like Baghdad with dozens of mosques due to a massive and unassimilated Middle Eastern immigrant enclave. Illegal alien migrants have brought us 16,000 new cases of tuberculosis in five years, 7,000 cases of leprosy and tens of thousands of cases of hepatitis ‘A’. MS-13 Gangs with 8,000 members now operate drug and prostitution rings in 28 American cities. Because of population pressures brought to us by immigration, California, Arizona, New Mexico and Colorado face water shortages that will prove catastrophic in coming years. Illegals cost taxpayers billions for schooling, welfare and crime. I remind you of our current national debt at $7.384 trillion.

With so many leaders in Congress as well as the president NOT doing their jobs, it’s little wonder the 19 hijackers KNEW they would succeed at 9/11. Today, they could easily succeed again—that’s how open it is on our borders.

But like Third World leaders who ignore problems until they become irreversible and unsolvable, our leaders invite Third World Momentum. It’s the reason those countries suffer and their citizens flee. It stems from the loss of the rule of law. It’s why we’re turning into a Third World country.

Zogby, Roper and Pew polls show 80-85 percent of Americans want illegal migration stopped. However, the actions of our president and Congress show a different and subversive agenda against Middle America. If Bush succeeds in matching willing workers with willing employees, this country will not remain at 15 million illegal aliens, but 50 million working at slave wages as we all plunge to the bottom of the economic barrel.

Our Congress, this president, our governors and mayors of cities across the nation violate their oaths of office. It’s time we take them to court. It’s time for us to start a Proposition 200 in each of our states. It’s time for the Minute Man Project. It’s time to stop illegal alien migration. It’s time for our leaders to stand up for America instead of violating their oaths of office.

NPG’s position is that total immigration, which now adds at least 1.3 million to the US population each year, must be reduced by at least 80 percent if population growth is to end and then recede over time to a long-term sustainable level of 150 million Americans. The most practical place to start is by strictly enforcing the laws already on the books against illegal entry and residence with the aim of reducing net annual US growth from illegal immigration and births to illegal residents from some three-quarters of a million yearly to near zero.

NPG has conservatively estimated the current illegal alien population at between ten million and fifteen million. In October 2007 at a Washington press conference, however, Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS - a nonprofit public interest organization) released reports from four of its experts variously estimating that 18 million to 38 million illegal aliens may now be in the US, with the permanent stock of illegals estimated as increasing yearly at between 1.3 million and 4.0 million.

Mexico requires that an American immigrant must prove that he has a source of income which is at least 43 times the minimum wage in Mexico City at the time of his immigration. We however have no such requirement--with few exceptions, immigrants to the US don't need to show an income, a degree, an ability to manage or own a business, Personal Savings, intelligence, morality, nor a faith in nor an understanding of Christianity. Most other countries, as well as the US until recent memory, had sensible immigration policies, as evidenced by what the jew thought of US Immigration policy as recently as 1924:

Gould's most inflammatory allegation consists of blaming IQ testers for magnifying the toll of those lost in the Holocaust (p. 263). Here he has followed the lead of Leon Kamin's (1974) The Science and Politics of IQ. The Kamin-Gould thesis is that early IQ testers claimed their research proved that Jews as a group scored low on their tests and that this finding was then conveniently used to support passage of the restrictive Immigration Act of 1924 which then denied entry to hapless Jewish refugees in the 1930s. Gould goes so far as to claim (1996, pp. 195-198; 255-258) that Henry H. Goddard (in 1917) and Carl C. Brigham (in 1923) labeled four-fifths of Jewish immigrants as "feeble-minded ... morons".

To accomodate the jew, immigration policy was turned upside down and an intelligent standard was replaced by no standard, thus violating the religious rights of the vast majority of Americans. To 264 million putative Christians in this putative Christian nation, the Statue of Liberty isn't our law, because the Holy Bible is:

"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me.
I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

Contrast this with what the Holy Bible says:

California voters were so incensed by the problems caused by lax immigration policy that we passed Proposition 187 by an overwhelming majority, to restrict immigration to the state in a way that the federal government should have but failed. Federal judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer single-handedly disobeyed the will of we the people and struck down what would have been law and a giant step closer to what we the people want, to what our Forefathers wanted, and to what our Holy Bible requires.

What did Mariana know about the "constitutionality" of a law which the Authors of our Constitution would have embraced with open arms? Not much. Was she misled, as millions of Americans are misled, when she read the inscription on the Jefferson Memorial "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free"? Doe she deal in half truths because she was educated in half truths? Does she know what Mr. Jefferson really thought about the differences between the Caucasoid and Negroid Races?:

"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them."

Besides ignoring popular opinion, and the opinion of one of our premier Founding Forefathers, and not really understanding or adding a thing to what is and what is not "constitutional", and comitting an outright act of treason against her own oath of office, and making a mere rag out of our once proud US Constitution, what else did Mariana know? Consider Mr. Lincoln's words on the matter:

"What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black races." Spoken at Springfield, Illinois, July 17, 1858; ABRAHAM LINCOLN COMPLETE WORKS, edited by Nicolay and Hay, published by The Century Company, 1894, Volume I, p. 273

So who is this minority of Americans who Marianna supports, and why does she support this minority at the great expense of the majority?

Posterity

immigration.gif (171173 bytes)

http://www.rpi.edu/~eglash/eglash.dir/itsc.dir/notes1_11.htm

C. Brigham (US 1923):

Defends work of Yerkes, supports application to immigration law

Cultural bias is OK because we don’t want immigrants who “don’t think like Americans.”

Explained correlation of IQ with amount of time in U.S. using absolute rather than relative time.

Explanation for lower IQ in non-english speaking “Nordics”: “that’s just cultural difference”

Impact of the Army IQ test results for African Americans and Jews: segregation and 1924 immigration restriction act.

http://www.eugenics.net/papers/jprnr.html

Gould's most inflammatory allegation is to blame IQ testers for increasing the toll of the Holocaust. His thesis is that early IQ testers claimed Jews as a group scored low on their tests. This finding was then allegedly used to support passage of the restrictive Immigration Act of 1924, under which Jewish refugees were denied entry in the 1930s. Gould even claims that Henry H. Goddard in 1917 and Carl C. Brigham in 1923 labeled four-fifths of Jewish immigrants as ``feeble-minded . . . morons.''

http://adrr.com/law0/pr5y5.htm

What most people do not know is that a generation ago, when IQ and achievement tests were first administered, Jewish and Asian students were at the bottom of the test groups and deemed racially inferior.

Test scores "proved" that Jews and Asians were inferior and hopeless. Now, test scores prove that Jews and Asians are superior and that other groups are hopeless.

If you believe that, I have some ocean front property in Arizona I'd like to sell you ...

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sats/interviews/lemann.html

Brigham wrote a book in 1923 called A Study of American Intelligence. This was based on his work on the Army Alpha Test. He analyzed the test results by race and found--as people who do that have always found--that people of color, Jews, Mediterraneans, anybody who wasn't a kind of what he would call a Nordic, was inherently intellectually inferior. And that the country was in big trouble because two many of these people were coming into the country. So this book is a kind of very ripe, racist book by today's standards, typical of establishment thinking of the time, although Brigham, you know, bothered to write it down. And it just stands up very well as an offensive piece of writing. Now, Brigham renounced it within about five years. To his great credit, he specifically disowned the book. He changed his mind, he broke with the eugenics movement and by the end of his life, was really one of the leading critics, of the eugenics movement. So he came around and deserves a lot of credit for that.