Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

The jewish Problem

In order to normalize the standardized test scores of New Jersey, New York, and Maryland with those of Tennessee, Minnesota, and Iowa, the test scores of all races, and the population of jews in these three Eastern states, must be radically adjusted.  The scores for these 6 states cannot be normalized by simply using the official jewish population for those Eastern states, coupled with the standardized test scores by race reported by multiple testing organizations.

SAT MATH SCORES

It is of course possible that the actual SAT math scores of Whites in these Eastern states are actually considerably lower than those for Whites in the Western states, but that will be dealt with as a separate issue.  The first objective is to do a worst case analysis which defines the outter parameters of these different scores by race and state, which requires looking first at the highest scores for Whites and the lowest scores for jews, blacks, and Hispanics.  Once those outter extremes are quantified, the expected percentage of jews in these Eastern states can be adjusted to normalize them, and then the standard deviations within scores for each race can be compared.

The high percentage of blacks in Tennessee and Maryland (23.4% and 35.6% respectively), coupled with the low percentage of jews in Tennessee, Minnesota, and Iowa, enables the actual scores of blacks to be determined with sufficient precision to calculate their contribution to the amazingly low scores of New Jersey, New York, and Maryland (105, 110, and 105 points, respectively, lower than Iowa).   Once their contribution to these low scores is adjusted for, then the test scores of jews as well as their population in these Eastern states is known with a high degree of precision.  The one variable that is not considered is the different percentage of test takers in each state, but  this variable can be compensated for by comparing the results to the NAEP Math scores which are not subject to this variability.

Tennessee's composite score matches it's actual score precisely if the SAT scores for blacks is adjusted downward by 56 points to 375, for Hispanics down by 40 points to 440, for Asians up by 30 points to 610, and for Whites up by 106 points to 597.  This also creates a perfect match for Minnesota and Iowa, but it causes the composite average for the Eastern states to be a total of 76 points higher.   To adjust for these Eastern states requires that the scores for jews to be adjusted downward by 99 points to 392.  The disparity between these Eastern states can then be normalized by changing the estimated population of jews in each of these states to 33%, 25%, and 17%, respectively.

 blacks Whites Hispanic Asian Indian jews Calculated Actual Diff SAT M original 431 491 480 580 437 491 SAT Math adjusted 375 597 440 610 437 392 New Jersey 54.75 203.577 54.56 35.38 0.437 129.36 478 478 0 New York 76.125 187.458 77.44 31.72 2.185 98 473 473 0 Maryland 133.5 237.009 15.4 23.79 1.311 66.64 478 478 0 Tennessee 87.75 444.765 3.96 6.1 0.437 0.392 543 543 0 Minnesota 19.5 515.808 9.68 25.01 8.303 0.784 579 579 0 Iowa 12.75 540.882 10.56 9.76 2.185 5.88 582 583 1

NAEP MATH SCORES

The NAEP Math scores for these Eastern states are 8.3, 17.2, and 17.2 points lower than Iowa, respectively, so a comparison can be made to the above population estimates to normalize the NAEP scores for these states.  The scores for Whites must be increased 20 points to 280 to normalize the Western states, but this biases the scores for the Eastern states.  To normalize New York and Maryland requires scores for jews  to be decreased 5 points to 265.  [note, the NAEP score for Tennessee is not available for that year].

 blacks Whites Hispanic Asian Indian jews Calculated Actual Diff New Jersey 14.60% 34.10% 12.40% 5.80% 0.10% 33.0% New York 20.30% 31.40% 17.60% 5.20% 0.50% 25.0% Maryland 35.60% 39.70% 3.50% 3.90% 0.30% 17.0% Tennessee 23.40% 74.50% 0.90% 1.00% 0.10% 0.1% Minnesota 5.20% 86.40% 2.20% 4.10% 1.90% 0.2% Utah 0.70% 88.90% 6.00% 2.40% 1.50% 0.5% Wyoming 1.20% 88.20% 6.20% 0.80% 2.80% 0.8% Oregon 2.60% 83.50% 7.40% 3.40% 2.00% 1.1% Iowa 3.40% 90.60% 2.40% 1.60% 0.50% 1.5% NAEP Math original 238 270 244 279 246 270 NAEP Math adjusted 238 280 244 279 246 265 New York 48.3 87.9 42.9 14.5 1.2 66.3 261 260.8 0 Maryland 84.7 111.2 8.5 10.9 0.7 45.1 261 260.8 0 Minnesota 12.4 241.9 5.4 11.4 4.7 0.5 276 275.4 -1 Iowa 8.1 253.7 5.9 4.5 1.2 4.0 277 278 1

The NAEP 1996 Mathematics Report Card, Table B.5, reports the math scores for "Whites" in Delaware and Rhode Island to be 275, which is 12 points lower than those for "Whites" in Minnesota and Montana, of 287. If jews are only .1% of the population of the Western states, then the only way for "Whites" in Delaware and Rhode Island to have such low scores (all else being equal) is for an average of 54.5% of the population of "Whites" in those Eastern states to be jews.

J = % of population who are jews

1 - J = % of population who are "Whites"

NAEP score for jews = 265

NAEP score for Whites = 287

265J + 287 (1-J) = 275

J = 54.5%, 1 - J = 45.5%

This appears to be far more likely than the "official population" of jews reported by a number of non-government sources, particularly since jews demanded in 1957 that the Census Bureau stop reporting the demographics of jews by race..

TIMSS MATH SCORES

The NAEP/TIMSS crosslinking study reports the estimated TIMSS scores by state which is consistent with SAT math, ACT math, GRE math, NAEP math, so this provides an alternative opportunity to verify the above assumptions.   The 404 TIMSS math score of Washington, DC, is used to represent blacks, the 565 score of Belgium is used to represent Whites, the 487 score from Spain is used to represent Hispanics and Indians, the 605 score from Japan is used to represent Asians, and instead of using the estimated scores for Whites to represent jews, the 466 score  from Israel is used to represent them.

The predicted composite average of Delaware, New York, Rhode Island, Minnesota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Montana, and Iowa are all higher than their actual scores by an average of 24 points.  To normalize the Western states requires the scores for Whites to be decreased 27 points, from 565 to 538.  This results in the composite average scores for the Eastern states being an average of 11 points lower than their actual scores, which cannot be normalized using the official population for jews in those states.  With 83% of the nation's 5.5 million jews in the Northeast, the actual percentage of the population in those states who are jews could be more than 20%.  However, not even making the assumption that 20% of the population of those states are jews is enough to account for the disparity in these three states.

In order for the predicted composite average TIMSS scores of Delaware, New York, and Rhode Island to match their actual TIMSS scores, the percentage of jews in those states must be increased by a large margin (22% in Delaware, 19% in New York, and 73% in Rhode Island), and the scores for jews must be increased by 29 points to 495.  This is not a claim that this is the actual percentage of jews in those states--it merely demonstrates that this is what the population should be if all other factors are equal.  The fact that American Whites score 27 points lower than Belgians is proof enough that all other factors are not equal, and suggests that Whites in those Eastern states could score even lower than Whites in the Western states.

 blacks Whites Hispanic Asian Indian jews Calculated Actual Diff Delaware 29.90% 41.90% 4.30% 1.80% 0.20% 22.0% New York 20.30% 37.40% 17.60% 5.20% 0.50% 19.0% Rhode Island 7.30% 5.30% 10.70% 3.30% 0.50% 73.0% Minnesota 5.20% 86.40% 2.20% 4.10% 1.90% 0.2% N. Dakota 0.90% 88.20% 1.10% 0.70% 8.10% 1.0% Nebraska 6.00% 85.40% 4.90% 1.30% 1.40% 1.0% Montana 0.60% 87.100% 1.50% 0.80% 9.90% 0.1% Iowa 3.40% 90.60% 2.40% 1.60% 0.50% 1.5% TIMSS actual 404 565 487 605 487 466 TIMSS adjusted 404 538 487 605 487 495 TIMSS Math Delaware 120.8 225.4 20.9 10.9 1.0 108.9 488 488 0.1 New York 82.0 201.2 85.7 31.5 2.4 94.1 497 497 0.1 Rhode Island 29.5 28.5 52.1 20.0 2.4 361.4 494 494 0.1 Minnesota 21.0 464.8 10.7 24.8 9.3 1.0 532 532 0.4 N. Dakota 3.6 474.5 5.4 4.2 39.4 5.0 532 532 -0.1 Nebraska 24.2 459.5 23.9 7.9 6.8 5.0 527 529 1.8 Montana 2.4 468.6 7.3 4.8 48.2 0.5 532 529 -2.9 Iowa 13.7 487.4 11.7 9.7 2.4 7.4 532 532 -0.4

If Asians in the US score closer to Whites in the US than to Asians in Japan, then scores for Whites would increase 1 point to 539 and jews 5 points to 500, which tends to confirm another methodology for determining the "intelligence" of jews through measuring their cranial capacity.

So what is "the jewish Problem".  It is that our immigration policy was modified in 1924 to permit "feeble minded ... morons" to enter the country, who then proceeded to tear down each and every Christian institution which made this the once greatest nation on Earth at the same time that they belittled and dumbed down our children with the STUPIDEST education ideas in human history.

 Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017 Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party