Free news

FREE blog







Gun poll








14th Amdt

19th Amdt














Ketubah Nasi: Bearing False Witness Regarding "Strangers"


The following discussion took place in the CHRISTIAN section of Paltalk which is dominated by hate-filled, paranoid, extremist, ugly, nasty, racist jews like Ketubah Nasi.   On Friday, June 25, 2005, at 2:00 pm, this nasty jew bore false witness by accusing those in his forum who had raised the issue of "ger" versus "nikro" of being:

  1. Ku Klux Klan
  2. White Supremacists.
  3. Nazis.
  4. Neo-nazis.
  5. Burning crosses on blacks lawns.
  6. Wearing sheets.

This ugly, nasty jew bore false witness like this before an audience of 50 witnesses, an act for which he deserves to be exiled from this putative Christian nation and ordered never to return.  To set the record straight:

  1. Not a single person he falsely accused of being in the KKK have ever even been to a KKK meeting.
  2. Not a single person in this forum has even been to a "White Supremacist" meeting.
  3. Every person in this forum who he levelled this false witness against knows that Nazis and neo-Nazis are some of the most detestable jews on the planet, and  NONE of us are jews.
  4. Only ONE member even admitted to "burning a cross", and this was in a private ceremony in his own home which involved a CHRISTIAN ceremony.
  5. Most of us have off-white sheets, not white sheets, we don't wear them except to bed, and this slanderous charge is as phony as his "understanding" of Scripture.

Do nasty jews like Ketubah actually believe what they say?  Most Christians would think that anyone who speaks like this would actually believe what they say,  because Christians are raised from birth to not lie. But jews are raised exactly the opposite--they are raised to LIE, just as Jesus warned us.  So it's probable that this nasty jew is LYING and knows that his allegations are FALSE--and thus knowingly and willingly bore false witness.

May 22, 2005


purewhiteisraelite: what's your take about this forum being in the Christian section?

Ketubah_Nasi: the beit Yacov ?

purewhiteisraelite: yes

Ketubah_Nasi: well, seeing that christianity has the lost sheep of the huose of Israel hidden within it, the section seems appropriate, to me

purewhiteisraelite: ?

purewhiteisraelite: explain?

Ketubah_Nasi: christianity holds the lost house of israel, judaism holds the house of judah

purewhiteisraelite: most Israelites of the House of Judah are Christians

purewhiteisraelite: and all Israelites of the House of Israel are Christians

Ketubah_Nasi: all jews are israelites, but not all israelite are Jews

purewhiteisraelite: no jew is an Israelite

Ketubah_Nasi: yes, they are still part of the commonwealth of Israel

purewhiteisraelite: if a "jew" was an Israelite, he wouldn't follow the Talmud, he'd follow the Torah

Ketubah_Nasi: neiother does christioanity follow the torah, yet they are still the lost sheep./ they both have blindness

purewhiteisraelite: Christians are the only who follow the Torah, jews follow the Talmud, which is exactly the opposite

Ketubah_Nasi: no, christians do not as a whole follow the Torah

Ketubah_Nasi: they do not wear Tzit Tzit, or keep clean meat laws, or do the feasts

purewhiteisraelite: that's not Torah

purewhiteisraelite: that's Talmud

Ketubah_Nasi: yes, it is

Ketubah_Nasi: Numbers 15:38 - Tzit Tzit

Ketubah_Nasi: Clean meat laws - Exodus

Ketubah_Nasi: all of that is in the torah

purewhiteisraelite: do you know the difference between the Torah and the Talmud?

Ketubah_Nasi: yes, The Torah is Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy

Ketubah_Nasi: Talmud is a very large compendium of volumnes of rabbinical commentary

purewhiteisraelite: the Talmud completely contradicts the Torah

purewhiteisraelite: in every aspect

Ketubah_Nasi: Not always, but in some places it does.

purewhiteisraelite: you can't contradict God's Law and claim to be an Israelite

purewhiteisraelite: Israelites do not do that

Ketubah_Nasi: Christianity contradicts God's laws all the time, but the fact that they are blinded Israel is still valid.

Ketubah_Nasi: when they recieve their IDENTITY, then they start moving back toeards torah

Ketubah_Nasi: and the same for Jews.

Ketubah_Nasi: when Jews recieve the IDENTITY of the messiah

purewhiteisraelite: nobody who follows the Talmud can ever start moving to God's Law

purewhiteisraelite: they are lost

purewhiteisraelite: forever

Ketubah_Nasi: Then so are Christians lost then.

Ketubah_Nasi: because Churchianity rejects the Torah in many respects

purewhiteisraelite: not true

Ketubah_Nasi: How many Christians do you know keeping the clean meat laws ?

Ketubah_Nasi: or keeping the Feasts ?

Ketubah_Nasi: hm ?

Ketubah_Nasi: or Keeping Yah's marriage laws ?

Ketubah_Nasi: or many other aspects of Torah

purewhiteisraelite: do you know what a mamzer is?

Ketubah_Nasi: a bastard, yes

purewhiteisraelite: what is a bastard?

Ketubah_Nasi: a child with no Father to speak for him

purewhiteisraelite: no

Ketubah_Nasi: thats how Torah defines it

purewhiteisraelite: that Torah tells us exactly what a mamzer is, but those who follow the Talmud do not

purewhiteisraelite: a mamzer is the offspring of an Israelite who marries a non-Israelite

purewhiteisraelite: when it was translated as "bastard", the definition WAS a mongreo

purewhiteisraelite: mongrel

Ketubah_Nasi: I understand that you reject the House of Judah, as being the Jews, but the arayan and anglo-israelist standpoint is hypocritical due to their own negiligence to keep the Torah

purewhiteisraelite: but God's Law doesn tchange just because an English definition changed

purewhiteisraelite: Jesus said it best--jews reject the command of God and follow man's law

Ketubah_Nasi: as for bastard, the lost house of Israel , scattered to the four winds, are now comprised of men from every colour, tribe, and language.

Ketubah_Nasi: so do Christians re: rejects the command of God, for tradition

purewhiteisraelite: are you a jew?

Ketubah_Nasi: I am an Israelite

Ketubah_Nasi: your hatred of judah is your error purewhite.

Ketubah_Nasi: Yah will correct it in time

purewhiteisraelite: your false accusation is your downfall

purewhiteisraelite: I don't hate Judah--I hate the Talmud

Ketubah_Nasi: Sop, you love your brother Judah? hmm?

Ketubah_Nasi: kippah, tzit tzit 's and all ?

purewhiteisraelite: and Judah is not the Talmud

Ketubah_Nasi: and Judah is not the Talmud (---- correct

Ketubah_Nasi: Judah however ARE the jews

Ketubah_Nasi: they are the only people group qualifying

purewhiteisraelite: who do you believe is the Tribe of Dan?

Ketubah_Nasi: probably those settled in Denmark

purewhiteisraelite: bingo

purewhiteisraelite: what about Nephtali?

Ketubah_Nasi: not, sure would have to check on that

purewhiteisraelite: Norway

purewhiteisraelite: how about Asher?

purewhiteisraelite: Sweden, Russia, Ukraine

Ketubah_Nasi: not sure again, I have books that trace the migrations

purewhiteisraelite: what tribe do you believe is Germany?

Ketubah_Nasi: not sure. the tribes are in many ways scattered, each country is not indicative of the exclusive population of whatever tribe, but may hold a majority of that tribe

purewhiteisraelite: we have proof that Germany is the TRibe of Judah

purewhiteisraelite: and I guarandamntee you that Germans don't think of themselves as "jews"

Ketubah_Nasi: I doubt it highly.

purewhiteisraelite: then who are the Germans?

Ketubah_Nasi: Germans do not follow hardly any of the Torah

purewhiteisraelite: 99% of Germans are Christians

Ketubah_Nasi: and they have the same identity factors as the rest of the lost sheep

Ketubah_Nasi: christians are not predominzately jews

purewhiteisraelite: and Christianity, regardless of its faults, is closer to the Torah than ANYBODY else

Ketubah_Nasi: christians are from the lost house of israel, ten tribes

Ketubah_Nasi: no, thats not the case

Ketubah_Nasi: Jews are closer to torah , at least, than christians

Ketubah_Nasi: Jews have the transmission of Torah in the Hebrew

Ketubah_Nasi: did chrisgtians?

Ketubah_Nasi: nope

Ketubah_Nasi: they transmitted it in greek and latin

Ketubah_Nasi: another clue for you

Ketubah_Nasi: the arayan message is wrong purewhite

purewhiteisraelite: German is descended directly from Hebrew, Yiddish is NOT

purewhiteisraelite: it's Yiddish which is not Hebrew

Ketubah_Nasi: so is english

Ketubah_Nasi: so is french

purewhiteisraelite: exactly

purewhiteisraelite: 95% of English came from Hebrew

Ketubah_Nasi: thats because Hebrew is the root language

purewhiteisraelite: but it's not the root langauge of Yiddish--why not?

Ketubah_Nasi: abnd Yiddish is merely a dialect of Hebrew, understandable since the Jews assimilated to some extent in Europe

purewhiteisraelite: it's not at all based on Hebrew

purewhiteisraelite: it's turkish-Mongol

purewhiteisraelite: and Turks and Mongols are not Israelites

Ketubah_Nasi: putrewhite, Hebrew is the 1 language everyone spoke before Babel. Hence ALL languages decend form Hebrew, after the tower of Babel

purewhiteisraelite: they don't even begin to make such a claim

purewhiteisraelite: Asians?

purewhiteisraelite: Africans?

purewhiteisraelite: Indians

purewhiteisraelite: no

Ketubah_Nasi: some indians are decended from the lost tribes, particularily Cherokees

Ketubah_Nasi: astounding similarities amongst them

purewhiteisraelite: but they mixed races and can no longer claim to be Israelites

Ketubah_Nasi: Israel is a mixed multitue now, its not about skin colour

purewhiteisraelite: Indians don't even have a written language

purewhiteisraelite: Israel always puts away the mixed multitude

purewhiteisraelite: and we wil again

purewhiteisraelite: in spades

Ketubah_Nasi: no, Israel puts away idolaters

purewhiteisraelite: mixed multitudes

Ketubah_Nasi: you are acting more like an Assyrian than an israelite purewhite

purewhiteisraelite: why did the priests sacrifice a ram?

Ketubah_Nasi: Israelites also allowed the wayfarer to covnert, and become part of Israel

Ketubah_Nasi: I note Ruth, the moabitess

purewhiteisraelite: Ezr 10:18 And among the sons of the priests there were found that had taken strange wives: namely, of the sons of Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brethren; Maaseiah, and Eliezer, and Jarib, and Gedaliah.

purewhiteisraelite: there were no Moabites at the time of Ruth--Israel destroyed them all

Ketubah_Nasi: strange wives = idolatrous wives of dfiferent religion

purewhiteisraelite: she was an Israelite living in Moab

purewhiteisraelite: hence was a "moabitess" by residency, not race

Ketubah_Nasi: and yesm there were moabites, because prkihecy states they will be punished in the latter days

purewhiteisraelite: no, it's non-Israelite wives

Ketubah_Nasi: no, its non-Yahweh fearing wives

purewhiteisraelite: "strange" comes from "nokriy", which means non-Israelite

Ketubah_Nasi: Moses married a cushite, a black woman

Ketubah_Nasi: and

purewhiteisraelite: why would Moses do that with 3 million Israelites all around him?

Ketubah_Nasi: Israelite is about faith in Yahweh, not SKIN COLOUR

purewhiteisraelite: she was an Israelite living in Cush

Ketubah_Nasi: because they had black wives too

Ketubah_Nasi: i have heard that argument, its eisogesis

purewhiteisraelite: sure, it's about faith, but you MUST be a pure descendant of Jacob, otherwise you're a mamzer

Ketubah_Nasi: no, incorrect, the lost house of Israel does aNOT have it identity racially, its a MIXED MULTITUDE

Ketubah_Nasi: BLACKS

Ketubah_Nasi: included

purewhiteisraelite: why did the priests sacrifice the ram then?

Ketubah_Nasi: and other colours

Ketubah_Nasi: brown, etc

Ketubah_Nasi: you will have to clarify

purewhiteisraelite: you think the Danes married niggers?

purewhiteisraelite: or the Swedes?

purewhiteisraelite: or Germans?

purewhiteisraelite: never happen

Ketubah_Nasi: thats irrelevent, the point is that all of the tribes intermarried

purewhiteisraelite: if they do, the offspring are not Israelites, they're mamzers

Ketubah_Nasi: and intermixed

purewhiteisraelite: that's ok

purewhiteisraelite: it's marrying OUTSIDE of the tribes

Ketubah_Nasi: no, a mamzer is a child with no father to speak for him

purewhiteisraelite: that is an abomination and blasphemy

purewhiteisraelite: the only sin

purewhiteisraelite: that's called both

Ketubah_Nasi: purewhite, its not wrong to marry a black woman, IF she fears Yahweh

purewhiteisraelite: how did Solomon sin?

Ketubah_Nasi: too many wives

purewhiteisraelite: wrong, it's a mortal sin

Ketubah_Nasi: and following them into idolatry

purewhiteisraelite: what was Solomon's sin?

Ketubah_Nasi: purewhite, no, its finem, according to torah

Ketubah_Nasi: solomons sins was in following his wives into idolatry - RELIGIOUS ISSUE, NOT SKIN COLOUR ISSUE

purewhiteisraelite: And King Solomon loved many foreign women, even the daughter of Pharaoh, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians, Hittites; 1Ki 11:1

Ketubah_Nasi: is there any condemnation there?

Ketubah_Nasi: no

purewhiteisraelite: Did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things? yet among many nations was there no king like him, and he was beloved of his God, and God made him king over all Israel: nevertheless even him did foreign women cause to sin. Neh 13:26-27

Ketubah_Nasi: the condemnation comes later when it says they lead him stray

purewhiteisraelite: it was a SIN to marry non-Israelite wives, EVEN for Solomon

Ketubah_Nasi: yes, they "caused him to sin"

Ketubah_Nasi: its not a skin colour issue

purewhiteisraelite: it was a SIN

Ketubah_Nasi: the mariages itself were not the problem

purewhiteisraelite: he married non-Israelite women

Ketubah_Nasi: it weas what the wives caused him to do that made him sin

purewhiteisraelite: and the consequences were terrible

Ketubah_Nasi: no, wrong

Ketubah_Nasi: its anot about colour

Ketubah_Nasi: not about colour

Ketubah_Nasi: its about aRELIGION

purewhiteisraelite: who said it's ab out color? You'

purewhiteisraelite: I said it's about race

Ketubah_Nasi: you are

Ketubah_Nasi: race is a misnomer

purewhiteisraelite: there are some Whites who are not Israelites

Ketubah_Nasi: we all come from Adam

purewhiteisraelite: but there are NO blacks who are

Ketubah_Nasi: race term is a misnomer

purewhiteisraelite: what does "tribe" mean?

Ketubah_Nasi: sorry, many blacks are part of the lost sheep if Israel

purewhiteisraelite: no, never

purewhiteisraelite: do you have blacks in your lineage?

Ketubah_Nasi: you may have them. who knows, anybody may have one or two

Ketubah_Nasi: you can still look white and have a black in yoru lineage

Ketubah_Nasi: 2700 years pal

Ketubah_Nasi: thats alot of overlap

Ketubah_Nasi: you can still loook white

purewhiteisraelite: I can guarantee you that when someone of my race marries a nigger, they are never ever accepted

purewhiteisraelite: folr a million years they're not accepted

Ketubah_Nasi: yes, perhaps by you, but thats because you misapply thescriptures

Ketubah_Nasi: and BOAST against the branches that bore you

purewhiteisraelite: makes no difference what you think about that--it's a fact of life

purewhiteisraelite: and it's true for ALL true Israelites

purewhiteisraelite: but not for jews

Ketubah_Nasi: its "your" fact of life, but not representative of the scriptures

purewhiteisraelite: because Jews DO have niggers in their ancestry

Ketubah_Nasi: so do you , a good chance

Ketubah_Nasi: or indian

Ketubah_Nasi: or something not white

Ketubah_Nasi: hitler even had a hew in his ancestry, and he did his best to hide it

Ketubah_Nasi: hew =- jew

purewhiteisraelite: I promise you that I know, and there is NO such thing

Ketubah_Nasi: i doubt you know anything about it, especially over 2700 years

purewhiteisraelite: Hitler also protected the jews, and killed 264 million Christians

purewhiteisraelite: ketubah, it' snot something that a family can hide

purewhiteisraelite: it also shows up in the racial features

Ketubah_Nasi: yes, after so many generations the black coour gene can become hidden

purewhiteisraelite: I've known people who were 1/128th negroid, and it shows loud and clearj

Ketubah_Nasi: after even four generations

purewhiteisraelite: it's not color

purewhiteisraelite: its' race

Ketubah_Nasi: race is a misnomer

purewhiteisraelite: the Negroid features are mostly not color

Ketubah_Nasi: no such thing

Ketubah_Nasi: we all come form 1 race

purewhiteisraelite: give me a break

Ketubah_Nasi: qwe all come form Adam

purewhiteisraelite: you are part nigger, aren't you?"

Ketubah_Nasi: we all come from Adam

Ketubah_Nasi: i dont know, are you?

purewhiteisraelite: Whites do NOT talk like or believe what you're saying now

purewhiteisraelite: No, of course I'm not

Ketubah_Nasi: im sure there is somdething in your bloodline you wold cringe at, havnig such foolish doctrine

Ketubah_Nasi: oh, i see, so "white" is a mentality now, and not just a colour, huh

Ketubah_Nasi: interesting

Ketubah_Nasi: you decend into the LUDICROUS

purewhiteisraelite: I guaranatee you that we know our lineage, and every single member of my race who went wrong--which fortunately isn't that often

Ketubah_Nasi: no lost sheep fo the house of Israel knows their lineage

Ketubah_Nasi: even Jews cannot make that claim prior to ad 70

purewhiteisraelite: but when they do, their descendants are no longer part of my race--the Israelite race

Ketubah_Nasi: thats a flat luie

Ketubah_Nasi: and i challenge you tp PROVE you decend from ancient Israel

purewhiteisraelite: I agree that jews ARE mixed

purewhiteisraelite: and that they have Negroid ancestry

Ketubah_Nasi: and so are you

purewhiteisraelite: but Israelits do no, by Israelite law

Ketubah_Nasi: and so do you

Ketubah_Nasi: yes they do

Ketubah_Nasi: you cannot prove that over 2700 years, you have remained white and only white

Ketubah_Nasi: there are surely some other colours mixed in there, facded to the background

purewhiteisraelite: a "nikro" is NEVER accepted as an Israelite

Ketubah_Nasi: thats your terminaology, not in keeping with torah

purewhiteisraelite: A mamzer shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD, Deuteronomy 23:2

purewhiteisraelite: "even to the tenth generation" is a Hebraism which means FOREVER

Ketubah_Nasi: yes because he has no father to speak for him, it would be disorderly

Ketubah_Nasi: and to the tenth does not mean forerver

purewhiteisraelite: for TEN GENERATIONS?

purewhiteisraelite: why do that to someone just because they had parents who weren't married?

Ketubah_Nasi: a mamzer can be adiopted, and become no more a mamzer

purewhiteisraelite: TENTH GENERATION

purewhiteisraelite: NEVER

purewhiteisraelite: a mamzer is mixed race

purewhiteisraelite: mongrel

Ketubah_Nasi: why exclude people of colour just because of their skin colour ?

Ketubah_Nasi: no, a mamzer is someone without a father


purewhiteisraelite: because they're NOT Israelites

Ketubah_Nasi: you have hijacked terms and redefined them


purewhiteisraelite: look at that definition of "bastard"

Ketubah_Nasi: and you have gone after a doctrine to assuage your political, economic, and personal vedetta against the perceieved wrons blacks have done you

Ketubah_Nasi: but, your theology is all eisogesis

purewhiteisraelite: "the offspring of parents of different races or nationalities".

Ketubah_Nasi: and doesnt hold water

Ketubah_Nasi: thats an arayan defintiion

purewhiteisraelite: that's teh definition of "bastard" at the time the word "mamzer" was translated by the KJV

Ketubah_Nasi: thats not a torah defintion

Ketubah_Nasi: i would doubt that highly, unless the dictionary you are using was written and edited by anglo-israelists

purewhiteisraelite: that's the Torah definition, your definition is from the Talmud

purewhiteisraelite: do you trust Strong's Concordance?

Ketubah_Nasi: no, i trust torah

Ketubah_Nasi: aND ONLY TORAH

purewhiteisraelite: From an unused root mian. to alienate; a mongrel

purewhiteisraelite: this is Stron'gs definition

purewhiteisraelite: look it up yourseslf

purewhiteisraelite: it's strong's #4464

Ketubah_Nasi: i do not trust strongs

purewhiteisraelite: what does YOUR dictionary say that a mamzer is?

purewhiteisraelite: of course you don't

purewhiteisraelite: all you trust is Talmud

Ketubah_Nasi: you can clearly see that people of other colours were in Israel

Ketubah_Nasi: was Uriah a mamzer according to you ?

Ketubah_Nasi: i dont even own a talmud

purewhiteisraelite: Uriah was rightly removed from the congregation of the LORD

purewhiteisraelite: David's sin was letting a Hittite into the congregation

purewhiteisraelite: An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD forever: Deuteronomy 23:3

purewhiteisraelite: Ammonites and Moabites were excluded based soley on RACE

purewhiteisraelite: they were descendants of Moab and Ammon

Ketubah_Nasi: if thats thecase, Yahweh would have commended David, not rebuked him

purewhiteisraelite: God killed David's firstborn for it

purewhiteisraelite: also to be sure a Hittites son wasn't in line to be king

purewhiteisraelite: kings can come only from israel

purewhiteisraelite: Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger [read: nikro] over thee, which is not thy brethren. Deuteronomy 17:15

Ketubah_Nasi: purewhite, you completely misinterpreted the David thing, the entire parable that Nathan gave him had nothing to do with race, or kicking out the "nikro", it had EVERYTHING to do with taking another man's wife.

Ketubah_Nasi: again, you prove your scripture twisting of elementary passages to create your preconcieved doctrine of colour-superiority

purewhiteisraelite: an Israelite woman who "marries" a Hittite has a marriage which is null and void

Ketubah_Nasi: then there would be no point in Nathan giving the parable of the lambs

purewhiteisraelite: you misinterpret the parable

Ketubah_Nasi: in the parable, the rich man was RIGHT to steal the poor mans 1 lamb

Ketubah_Nasi: accordin to your thiking

purewhiteisraelite: and you can't change God's Law

purewhiteisraelite: Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger [read: nikro] over thee, which is not thy brethren. Deuteronomy 17:15

Ketubah_Nasi: you are misunderstanding God's law

purewhiteisraelite: what does this say to you, ketubbah?

Ketubah_Nasi: deal with the point at hand

Ketubah_Nasi: deal with the parable given to David

Ketubah_Nasi: you cant get around it

Ketubah_Nasi: if david was justified, then the rich man should not have been seen as "bad" for taking the 1 lamb/wife of Uriah

purewhiteisraelite: can a Hittite be a king?

Ketubah_Nasi: you completely twist this

purewhiteisraelite: no

Ketubah_Nasi: thats a different issue

purewhiteisraelite: read this again and tell me what you think this means

purewhiteisraelite: Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger [read: nikro] over thee, which is not thy brethren. Deuteronomy 17:15

Ketubah_Nasi: and IF he converst, he BECOMES ISRAEL ANYWAY, uriah may not have converted, but was only bonded to David

purewhiteisraelite: a Hittite cannot "convert"

Ketubah_Nasi: but YHWH still considered the marriage valid re: Uriah and Bathsheba

purewhiteisraelite: show me that verse

Ketubah_Nasi: yes they can

purewhiteisraelite: a Moabite or Ammonite cannot "convert"

purewhiteisraelite: you're making this stuff up as we go

Ketubah_Nasi: Ex:12:48: And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee, and will keep the passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land:

Ketubah_Nasi: deal with it pal

Ketubah_Nasi: and he shall be as one that is born in the land:


Ketubah_Nasi: hence, he BECOMES ISRAEL


purewhiteisraelite: Deuteronomy 7:2 and when Jehovah thy God shall deliver them up before thee, and thou shalt smite them; then thou shalt utterly destroy them: thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them

Ketubah_Nasi: no, im finished with this foolishness purewhite, you need to repent ofyour error


purewhiteisraelite: that "stranger" is a DIFFERENT word than "nokriy"

purewhiteisraelite: you need to know which Hebrew word that is

Ketubah_Nasi: and stop speaking badly about other colours, who are israel, or the jews


purewhiteisraelite: I hate jews and niggers, ketubah, and you love them

Ketubah_Nasi: purewhite, i hardly think those in your group know hebrew very well at all


purewhiteisraelite: that's your problem not mine

Ketubah_Nasi: then you cannot have eternal life if you hate them


Ketubah_Nasi: and YHWH is against you purewhite


Ketubah_Nasi: and against your murderous plans


purewhiteisraelite: jews and "eternal life" are so far from each other it's not funny

purewhiteisraelite: look up that word "stranger"


purewhiteisraelite: there are 8 Hebrew words which are all translated as "stranger"

purewhiteisraelite: the one you quoted is a fellow Israelite

purewhiteisraelite: a "nokriy" is ANY non-Israelite

purewhiteisraelite: Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger [read: nikro] over thee, which is not thy brethren. Deuteronomy 17:15

purewhiteisraelite: WHO did God command the Israelites to MAKE NO COVENANT WITH?

purewhiteisraelite: HITTITES

purewhiteisraelite: Deuteronomy 7:1 When Jehovah thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and shall cast out many nations before thee, the Hittite, and the Girgashite, and the Amorite, and the Canaanite, and the Perizzite, and the Hivite, and the Jebusite, seven nations greater and mightier than thou

purewhiteisraelite: Deuteronomy 7:2 and when Jehovah thy God shall deliver them up before thee, and thou shalt smite them; then thou shalt utterly destroy them: thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them;

purewhiteisraelite: Deuteronomy 7:3 neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son

purewhiteisraelite: NO COVENANT

purewhiteisraelite: NO MARRIAGE

purewhiteisraelite: NO HITTITES

purewhiteisraelite: KINGS MUST BE ISRAELITES

purewhiteisraelite: HITTITES CANNOT "CONVERT"


purewhiteisraelite: have you looked up the word "stranger" yet?


Exo 12:48 And when3588 a stranger1616 shall sojourn1481 with854 thee, and will keep6213 the passover6453 to the LORD,3068 let all3605 his males2145 be circumcised,4135

purewhiteisraelite: this term "stranger" was translated from the Hebrew word "ger" [#1616] which ALWAYS means a fellow Israelite, it is NOT a nikro [#5237] which ALWAYS means a NON-Israelite

Ketubah_Nasi: have you come again to treach us error, before the appointed time??????????????????????????????? whooo aaaaahhh hahahahahah


purewhiteisraelite: did you look up the word "nekar" and "ger"?

purewhiteisraelite: they're both translated as "stranger"

Ketubah_Nasi: no, have not discussed this yet, i will perhaps, in due time

purewhiteisraelite: but one is an Isrealite, and the other is not

purewhiteisraelite: now is the time

purewhiteisraelite: even concordances note the difference

Ketubah_Nasi: at any rate, i will give you this, the book of Jasher relates how the sons of Ham shall always serve the sons of Shem

purewhiteisraelite: all sons of Ham are referred to as "nikro"

purewhiteisraelite: but so are many of the sons of Seth

Ketubah_Nasi: is that where the term nigro came from ?

purewhiteisraelite: it seems like it

purewhiteisraelite: though we don't have the precise etymology

purewhiteisraelite: the Ammonites were sons of Seth, and were "nikro"

purewhiteisraelite: the only non-Israelites who I haven't found scripture where they're referred to as "nikros" are the Ishmaelites

purewhiteisraelite: descendants of Hagar

purewhiteisraelite: the word "ger" always refers to Israelites who're travelling in other nations [read: tribes]


May 26, 2005

Ketubah_Nasi: We reject these interpretation and beleive all colour groups represent the house of Israel because fo thd dispersion and assimilation over 2700 years

Ketubah_Nasi: We reject Arayan bible interpretatiions

Ketubah_Nasi: we REJECT the notiion that there was only a regional flood

Ketubah_Nasi: we REJECT the serpent seed doctrine

Ketubah_Nasi: we reject all of these fallaciaous ideas

Ketubah_Nasi: No, I will not join ,I have to attend to duties

Ketubah_Nasi: We reject these interpretation and beleive all colour groups represent the house of Israel because fo thd dispersion and assimilation over 2700 years

Ketubah_Nasi: We reject Arayan bible interpretatiions

Ketubah_Nasi: we REJECT the notiion that there was only a regional flood

Ketubah_Nasi: we REJECT the serpent seed doctrine

Ketubah_Nasi: we reject all of these fallaciaous ideas

Ketubah_Nasi: No, I will not join ,I have to attend to duties

purewhiteisraelite: who is "we"

purewhiteisraelite: just saw your pm

purewhiteisraelite: who is "we" who rejects all this?

purewhiteisraelite: and what is the difference between "nikro" and "ger"?


May 27, 2005

Ketubah_Nasi: <<(05/26/05 5:53 PM EDT)>> I personally think I won that debate

Mamzerhammer: there is no debate

Mamzerhammer: God's Law cannot change, not even with a thousand volumes of the Talmud

Mamzerhammer: a ger is a fellow Israelite from one tribe visiting another tribe

Mamzerhammer: a nikro is a non-Israelite who cannot ever enter the congregation of the LORD

Mamzerhammer: simple

Mamzerhammer: if you deny that, you deny God's Word, you don't win a "debate"





Ketubah_Nasi: <<(05/27/05 4:15 PM EDT)>> I deny your interpretation. You do not even beleive the flood account, and you say "I" am ignoring scripture ?

Mamzerhammer: the "flood account" says that the "erets" was flooded

Mamzerhammer: Abraham walked the "erets" in one day

Mamzerhammer: why do you ignore that?

Mamzerhammer: do you think Abraham walked the entire "world" in one day?

Mamzerhammer: it's a mistranslation to claim that "erets" means the whole world

Mamzerhammer: Gen 13:17 Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it; for I will give it unto thee.

Mamzerhammer: Gen 7:6 And Noah [was] six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.

Mamzerhammer: "land" and "earth" are the same Hebrew word

Mamzerhammer: does it mean "world" or "land"?


May 30, 2005



gleamingwhiteisraelite: so how are we wrong?

Ketubah_Nasi: you deny a worldwide flood

Ketubah_Nasi: you have 2 seedline error

Ketubah_Nasi: you deny moses married cushite/black woman

Ketubah_Nasi: you deny ruth was moabitess

gleamingwhiteisraelite: the Holy Bible says nothing about a worldwide flood, and it's impossible

Ketubah_Nasi: all in order to preserve your racial identity notions from one law

Ketubah_Nasi: it was possible then

Ketubah_Nasi: different conditions on the earth

Ketubah_Nasi: 2x air poressure, 30 percent more oxygen

gleamingwhiteisraelite: the Holy Bible only says "the erets" was flooded

Ketubah_Nasi: canopy of water over the earth

Ketubah_Nasi: you can define erez as worldwide

gleamingwhiteisraelite: it was jews who "interpreted" erets to mean the whole world, but only when it was convenient

Ketubah_Nasi: sorry, ALL CULTURES have flood story

Ketubah_Nasi: worldwide in scope

gleamingwhiteisraelite: so what?

Ketubah_Nasi: you use exegetic gymnastic to preserve your provate interetation of the Torah

gleamingwhiteisraelite: that doesn't change God's Word one bit

Ketubah_Nasi: provate = private

gleamingwhiteisraelite: the word "erets" is usually translated as "land", not Earth

Ketubah_Nasi: you deny God by hating they brother

gleamingwhiteisraelite: jews are NOT my "brother"

Ketubah_Nasi: of yes they are

Ketubah_Nasi: you deny it, but God sees

gleamingwhiteisraelite: only Israelites are my brother

gleamingwhiteisraelite: nobody else

Ketubah_Nasi: you are filled with hate. you cannot be saved and hate thy brother

Ketubah_Nasi: you deny Yahshua who gave parable citing samaritan as "brother" to judah

gleamingwhiteisraelite: a Samaritan IS an Israelite

Ketubah_Nasi: all mankind each ones brother

Ketubah_Nasi: no, they are not

gleamingwhiteisraelite: the people who were moved into the territory were NEVERF called Samaritans

Ketubah_Nasi: again, you deny plain text

Ketubah_Nasi: thats 4 exegetical gymnastics

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Howbeit every nation made gods of their own, and put [them] in the houses of the high places which the Samaritans had made, every nation in their cities wherein they dwelt. 2Ki 17:29

Ketubah_Nasi: thats doesnbt prove anything

gleamingwhiteisraelite: ONLY Israelites were ever Samaritans, and you jews LIE when you say otherwise

Ketubah_Nasi: thats after the house of israel was caRRIED AWAY

Ketubah_Nasi: the assyrians IMPORTED them into the land occupied prevoiously by the house of israel

Ketubah_Nasi: im not a jew

Ketubah_Nasi: im a member of the house of israel

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Ketubah, if you can't read that, you are a jew

Ketubah_Nasi: you are the ones lying AND ACTING LIKE ASSYRIANS

Ketubah_Nasi: everyone a jew who disagrees with you huh?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: nobody but jews can't comprehend that SCRIPTURE says that Israelites are Samaritans, and Samaritans are Israelites

Ketubah_Nasi: whole word a jew then

Ketubah_Nasi: they are not the same

Ketubah_Nasi: history bears this out

gleamingwhiteisraelite: the "goy" who were moved into Samaria were NEVER called Samaritans

Ketubah_Nasi: aNY house of israel left intermarried

Ketubah_Nasi: so this two destroys your arguments

gleamingwhiteisraelite: show me ONE verse which says that Israelites "intermarried"

Ketubah_Nasi: history shows it

gleamingwhiteisraelite: it was a blasphemy and an abomination for an Israelite to marry outside of the tribes

gleamingwhiteisraelite: the offspring would NOT be Israelites

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Ezr 10:19 And they gave their hands that they would put away their wives; and being guilty, they offered a ram of the flock for their trespass.

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Ezr 10:18 And among the sons of the priests there were found that had taken nikro wives: namely, of the sons of Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brethren; Maaseiah, and Eliezer, and Jarib, and Gedaliah

gleamingwhiteisraelite: it was a SIN, even for priests

Ketubah_Nasi: you are making this racial when its religious

gleamingwhiteisraelite: "nokri" means race, not religion

Ketubah_Nasi: you are using spirious translation

gleamingwhiteisraelite: all non-Israelites are called "nikro" regardless of their religion

Ketubah_Nasi: are you using greek ?>

Ketubah_Nasi: why use greek in OT ?

Ketubah_Nasi: use hebrew

gleamingwhiteisraelite: this is Hebrew

gleamingwhiteisraelite: "nikro" is a Hebrew word


gleamingwhiteisraelite: that has all the occurrences of "nikro", not one is related to "religion"

Ketubah_Nasi: you know, it would be one thing if you guys claimed you were israel and then started acting like israel, and keeping the torah. but the fact that you act and look nothing like Israel tells me you cannot be israel , that you are still blind

gleamingwhiteisraelite: so what?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: the Scripture doesn't change anyway

gleamingwhiteisraelite: and Israelites can NEVER marry non-Israelites, period

Ketubah_Nasi: so what? it measn you are not israel, it means you do NOT serve the Elohim of Avraham Yitchac and Yaacov, and it measn you are a bunch of hypocrites

Ketubah_Nasi: and besides, you are lal intermarried anyway

Ketubah_Nasi: every one of you

Ketubah_Nasi: even hitler had jew blood in him

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Hitler WAS a je

gleamingwhiteisraelite: w

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Hitler was NOT an Israelite

Ketubah_Nasi: i thought hitler was your buddy

Ketubah_Nasi: your pal

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Hitler killed 264 million ISRAELITES

Ketubah_Nasi: whats the deal" hm ?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: read: Christians

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Hitler was a JEW, and I HATE jews

Ketubah_Nasi: thats strange. i thought he was your buddy

Ketubah_Nasi: you dont wera swastika on your head , shaved like neo-nazi ?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: why would a jew be my buddy?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Hitler KILLEd 264 million Christians,many of them my ancestors and relatives

Ketubah_Nasi: i see. so whats so bad about the jews ?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: for one thing, they KILLED 264 million

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Christians in Europe

gleamingwhiteisraelite: and 65 million in Russia

Ketubah_Nasi: lol

Ketubah_Nasi: you make me laugh

Ketubah_Nasi: dont you mean the catholic church killed them ?>

gleamingwhiteisraelite: ?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Hitler was a JEW, not a Catholic

Ketubah_Nasi: what history you been reading pal !

gleamingwhiteisraelite: no Catholic leader ever accepted Hitler

Ketubah_Nasi: hitler was an accultist

Ketubah_Nasi: they hid his band of bloody men

gleamingwhiteisraelite: I livedin Germany 9 years,and Russia 2 years

gleamingwhiteisraelite: American "history" is wrong

Ketubah_Nasi: the jews do not rule the world!

Ketubah_Nasi: if they did, israel would have been established LONG BEFORE NOW

gleamingwhiteisraelite: jews are NOT Israelites

gleamingwhiteisraelite: the Germans are the Tribe of Judah, not "jews"

gleamingwhiteisraelite: nd I guarantee you that Germans and jews are NOT the same race

Ketubah_Nasi: germans do not keep the torah

gleamingwhiteisraelite: 99% of Germans are Christians

gleamingwhiteisraelite: you can't get closer to the Torah than that

Ketubah_Nasi: its not about christian

gleamingwhiteisraelite: no other country can claim that

Ketubah_Nasi: its abotu torah

Ketubah_Nasi: that defines jews

gleamingwhiteisraelite: the first five books ARE the Torah

gleamingwhiteisraelite: what jews practice is TALMUD,not Torah

gleamingwhiteisraelite: BIG DIFFEREN CE

Ketubah_Nasi: germans dont keep first five books

gleamingwhiteisraelite: nobody on the planet keeps the first five books of the Holy Bible better than the Germans--nobody

gleamingwhiteisraelite: jews are so far off it's not even funny

gleamingwhiteisraelite: they don't even know what Israelite law IS

Ketubah_Nasi: germans do not keep most of the laws

gleamingwhiteisraelite: why don't you come in here and discuss it?

Ketubah_Nasi: im in another room

Ketubah_Nasi: YHWHs Patriarchal marriage

gleamingwhiteisraelite: what jews do is the OPPOSITE of the Torah, what Germans do might not be precise, but no other race is any closer to the Torah than Germans

gleamingwhiteisraelite: ah

Ketubah_Nasi: wrong, germans are way off

gleamingwhiteisraelite: how would you know?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: you know nothing about Germans except what the LYING jews in the US want you to know

Ketubah_Nasi: because i understand and know protestant europe

gleamingwhiteisraelite: I grew up there

Ketubah_Nasi: i could ask you a series of questions to see if they keep torah

gleamingwhiteisraelite: how do you know "protestant Europe"?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: your series of questions are JEW LAW, not Israelite, read: God's Law

gleamingwhiteisraelite: it's exactly what Jesus REJECTED

Ketubah_Nasi: I read form genesis to deuteronomy

gleamingwhiteisraelite: and you understand utterly none of it

gleamingwhiteisraelite: you don't even know what a mamzer is

gleamingwhiteisraelite: you don't know what a nokriy is

gleamingwhiteisraelite: these are BASIC things

Ketubah_Nasi: i know what strongs says it is, and it doesn mention race

gleamingwhiteisraelite: even Stron'gs DOES mention race, and Strong's is mostly WRONG

Ketubah_Nasi: it mentions it, but there are other dfinitions

Ketubah_Nasi: and race may not be the deciding factor

Ketubah_Nasi: religion always is

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Strong's Lexicon H4464 ���� mamze^r mam-zare' From an unused root mian. to alienate; a mongrel

gleamingwhiteisraelite: this is Strong's

gleamingwhiteisraelite: what's a mongrel?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: a "religion", or a "race"?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Strong's Lexicon H4464 ���� mamze^r mam-zare' From an unused root mian. to alienate; a mongrel

gleamingwhiteisraelite: did that come thru?

gleamingwhiteisraelite: does Strong's say "mongrel" in your reference?

Ketubah_Nasi: mongrel could mean religious

gleamingwhiteisraelite: NO

Ketubah_Nasi: or blend of many religions

gleamingwhiteisraelite: it ALWA

gleamingwhiteisraelite: YS

Ketubah_Nasi: like bhai

gleamingwhiteisraelite: refers to mixed race

Ketubah_Nasi: you are making this about skin colour, it isnt

Ketubah_Nasi: its about religion

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary -- mon'grel (mun'grel), n. A cross between types of persons or things. adj. Of or pertaining to an impure or mixed breed or race.

gleamingwhiteisraelite: show me a dictionary which defines "mongrel" as religious

Ketubah_Nasi: race is a misnomer anyway

gleamingwhiteisraelite: there is NO such thing

Ketubah_Nasi: it infers there are several ines of humanity based on an evolutionary cycle

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary -- mon'grel (mun'grel), n. A cross between types of persons or things. adj. Of or pertaining to an impure or mixed breed or race.

gleamingwhiteisraelite: this means RACE

Ketubah_Nasi: no, the scriptures speak plainly. the messiah had Rahab in his line

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Webster's New World Dictionary -- mon grel (mun'grel) adj. of mixed breed, race, origin, or character

Ketubah_Nasi: or character

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Rehab was an ISRAELITE

Ketubah_Nasi: thats the correct interpretation ot use in the scriptures

Ketubah_Nasi: no she wasnt

Ketubah_Nasi: 'she was not israelite

Ketubah_Nasi: neither was moses second wife

Ketubah_Nasi: neither was ruth

Ketubah_Nasi: you guys are WAAAAAAAAAYYY of

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Ruth was an ISRAELITE

Ketubah_Nasi: lol

Ketubah_Nasi: bible says she was moabitess

gleamingwhiteisraelite: otherwise she would not qualify as a kinsman redeemere

gleamingwhiteisraelite: KINSMAN

gleamingwhiteisraelite: is Israelite

Ketubah_Nasi: she qualify through her husband

Ketubah_Nasi: nt of herself

gleamingwhiteisraelite: Ruth was a "Moabitess" because she was an Israelite living in Moab--all the Moabs had b een destroyed 4 centuries earlier

gleamingwhiteisraelite: there were NO Moabs at the time of Ruth

Ketubah_Nasi: no, thats incorrect, because moab is still to be struck down in the future

gleamingwhiteisraelite: The Israelites who took that land were called "Moabites" only because they lived there

Ketubah_Nasi: no, wrong

Ketubah_Nasi: prophecies talk of moabites in future

gleamingwhiteisraelite: not in Moab

Ketubah_Nasi: hence your arguments fails

gleamingwhiteisraelite: they were all d estroyed or exiled

gleamingwhiteisraelite: they could not remain in Moab

gleamingwhiteisraelite: God commanded it

Ketubah_Nasi: i beleive scriptures say moabitess.

Ketubah_Nasi: and hence is beleive

Ketubah_Nasi: if she was israelite, she would noth ave said "my god shall be your god"

Ketubah_Nasi: she came FROM paganism

Ketubah_Nasi: hence she was moabitess

gleamingwhiteisraelite: it says nothing about Ruth being a pagan, and it's NOT about religion

gleamingwhiteisraelite: a Moabite can NEVER enter the congregaiton of the LORD

Ketubah_Nasi: you didnt answer my objecxtion

Ketubah_Nasi logged off at 11:28 AM


June 10, 2005


purewhiteisraelite: ever figure out why the Israelites would let a Moabite in the congregation and violate God's Law?
Ketubah_Nasi: it doesnt violate the law
purewhiteisraelite: how come?
Ketubah_Nasi: not if you read it correctly
purewhiteisraelite: we did read it correctly,and so did many other Biblical scholars
Ketubah_Nasi: those scholars have axes to grind
purewhiteisraelite: it's the jews who have an axe to grind--they want to obscure this simple law
Ketubah_Nasi: the jews have the torah and have transmitted it in original hebrew and you are the ones calling them false, using their own book!
purewhiteisraelite: not a single word a jew writes can be trusted--it's the Israelites who wrote it anyway, the jews just stole it
Ketubah_Nasi: no, your house fell in 700 AD
Ketubah_Nasi: and the house of Judah was the only one remaining to transmitt the torah
purewhiteisraelite: come to the forum
purewhiteisraelite: not a word of the Talmud can be trusted
purewhiteisraelite: only the First five books of the Holy Bible are true
Ketubah_Nasi: the first five books were transmitted in hebrew by teh houase of judah
purewhiteisraelite: it was the House of Israel
purewhiteisraelite: the Holy Bible was written by, for, and about the House of Israel,not the House of Judah
purewhiteisraelite: if you read it carefully, you'll see that Judah is given only honorable mention
Ketubah_Nasi: quite wrong, only the NT was transmitted by the house of israel
Ketubah_Nasi: the torah, the first five books, in original hebrew, has been transmitted by the Jews
purewhiteisraelite: jews are not the House of Judah
purewhiteisraelite: jews follow Talmud, Judah follows Torah
Ketubah_Nasi: jews are the unbeleiving house of udah, yes, and SOME jews do beleive
purewhiteisraelite: no jew believes
purewhiteisraelite: only Judah believes
Ketubah_Nasi: pure, yes, there are some jews that come to Yahshua
purewhiteisraelite: Jesus said jews were "not of my sheep"[read: race]==he EXCLUDED them
Ketubah_Nasi: no, he never said that in reference to jews. cite your source
purewhiteisraelite: Joh 10:26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.
purewhiteisraelite: Joh 10:31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.
Ketubah_Nasi: Mt:23:2: Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do
purewhiteisraelite: ALL jews were not "of my sheep"
purewhiteisraelite: do you believe Jesus was telling them to obey the Pharisees?
Ketubah_Nasi: thats true, but Yahshua upheld phariseac authrotiy
Ketubah_Nasi: he was telling them to obey the Pharisses who were reading Moses, and that they should obey Moses
Ketubah_Nasi: but the Pharisees sat in Moses seat, OF JUDGEEMNT
purewhiteisraelite: Jesus CONDEMNED the Pharisees--He did not suggest that Israelites SHOULE obey the Pharisees, He simply said that they do (and were wrong for doing so)
Ketubah_Nasi: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do
purewhiteisraelite: not true
purewhiteisraelite: read it again
Ketubah_Nasi: thats what it says
purewhiteisraelite: Jesus HATED the jews
Ketubah_Nasi: no he didnt
purewhiteisraelite: He would not command Israelites to follow that which He HATED
Ketubah_Nasi: he wept for jerusalem and wept for them and said father forgive them before giving up the ghost
purewhiteisraelite: for the jew?
purewhiteisraelite: or the Israelites?
purewhiteisraelite: there were both jews and Israelites in Jerusalem
Ketubah_Nasi: you cannot be of the father is you hate fellow human beings
purewhiteisraelite: what did Jesus call the jews?
Ketubah_Nasi: he called some of the leadership children of the devil, yes
purewhiteisraelite: you brood of vipers", they will be "thrown into the fire", "hypocrites!", "babbling like pagans", "wicked", "adulterous", "Ninevah will ... condemn [you]", "you break the command of God", "teachings are but rules taught by men", "will be pulled up by the roots", "blind guides", "blind man", "guard against ... the teachings of the Pharisees and Sadducees",
purewhiteisraelite: you yourself do not enter ... the kingdom of heaven", "blind fools", "blind men", "Blind Pharisee", "you are like whitewashed tombs", "you are the children of those who murdered the prophets", "you snakes", "condemned to hell", "Pharisees ... rejected God's purpose for themselves", "you foolish people",
purewhiteisraelite: Jesus HATED the jews
purewhiteisraelite: you are like unmarked graves", "you build tombs for the prophets, yet it was your forefathers who killed them", "will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world", "whom you slew between the temple and the altar",
purewhiteisraelite: you don't call people those names unless you HATE them
Ketubah_Nasi: no, he was rebuking them
Ketubah_Nasi: rebuling the loveless leadership
purewhiteisraelite: this is called HATE
purewhiteisraelite: If I called you those names, you'd claim I hate you
Ketubah_Nasi: maybe im black, and you already hate me no matter what
purewhiteisraelite: that would be true if you were a nigger
purewhiteisraelite: or even a part nigger
Ketubah_Nasi: but the funny thing is that most probably, over 2700 years , YOU have some un-white BLOOD IN YOU lol
purewhiteisraelite: nope, impossible
purewhiteisraelite: not with Israelite law
purewhiteisraelite: and with the current laws in our home countries
Ketubah_Nasi: your house FELL !
Ketubah_Nasi: in 700 BC!
purewhiteisraelite: 99% of the Israelites of the House of Israel were long gone as of 2,587 years ago--they were all in Europe and Britain
Ketubah_Nasi: nope
Ketubah_Nasi: they assimilated with the persians
Ketubah_Nasi: and other people groups
Ketubah_Nasi: there is a reason why Rome called them "barbarians"
purewhiteisraelite: there were only 200,000 Israelites in Judaea at the time of the Assyrian captivity--where were the other 9.8 million?
purewhiteisraelite: there were 3.5 million Israelites with Moses thousands of years earlier
Ketubah_Nasi logged off at 12:14 PM


Gen 7:6 And Noah [was] six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.



jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition


Hit Counter


Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party