Free news

FREE blog







Gun poll








14th Amdt

19th Amdt














Michael FATS Moore



Social Transfer Payments


Guys who don�t even understand Economics 101 like Michael Moore ( who never will, even with award winning economists trying to teach them) will never understand that the only reason �The U.S sh*ts on their own people more than any country�, is that Guys who don�t even understand Economics 101 like Michael Moore ( who never will, even with award winning economists trying to teach them) have too much influence with  our politicians.


With ONE TRILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR in social transfer payments, mostly from White working men to almost exclusively Black nonworking female headed households, Michael Moore�s claim that �U.S. �Sh*ts On Their Own� People More than Any Other Country� is a FLAT OUT LIE.




















Included in this $77,777 PER BLACK HOUSEHOLD, per year, are schools like those in Highland Park, Illinois and Washington, DC, where EACH STUDENT costs more than $30,000 per year, and according to the ACLU, produce students with a 100% ILLITERACY RATE.

Or the more one million Blacks now in the world�s most costly, and modern prisons who now cost US $300,000 in total costs per inmate (including judges, police, prison workers, and their ponderous pensions and benefits), for a grand total of $300 billion which no other country has to suffer.

Or the world�s most expensive (and worst) health care system, which costs us 6 times more than most other systems (18% of GDP vs. 3% in many other countries with better systems) where the only explanation is the number of Blacks taking advantage of this �free health care system�. Since American Whites have shorter life expectancies than most Whites in other countries with much less expensive health care, we cannot see any benefit they get. Conversely, American Blacks have a life expectancy twice that of their cousins in Africa. If we divide the $3.2 trillion in health care expenditures by the 38 million Blacks who appear to be the primary beneficiaries, this is $84,210 per American Black.

This is before obamacare increased our social transfer payments from one trillion dollars per year, to three trillion.












Michael Moore on Mooreon-onomics


  1. Not Even Milton Friedman Could Penetrate His FAT Skull, Even When it Contained 90% Less Fat

  2. Moore's "Right" to Force Niggers on Me and Mine Will NEVER Exceed Our Right to Free Association With Whom We Please.

  3. Moore HATES the Sheer Concept of the WHITE Race.




"health care", anti-gun, NUT Michael Moore

Michael Fats Moore

[email protected]


It's been a while since I've taken (no, wasted) the time to attempt to educate this uneducable in Economics 101, but his recent complete failure to come to grips with the colossal failure of his socialist policies on the Larry King Live Show when we the people rose up and tossed out obamacare deserves further scrutiny.


Both you and Larry King are  SO FAR OUT OF TOUCH with reality that you deserve no more electrons!

Michael Moore wants US, who ALREADY subsidize TWO competing health care systems [the free enterprise one and the government one], which ALREADY consume 12% of GDP [four TIMES what most people in the world spend for "health care", even those like Japan and Australia where the average life expectancy is ALREADY four years longer] to pay $60,000  to reattach another person's social fingertip just because HE cut it off, just because HE didn't have the money, just because HE won't borrow the money to pay for it, just because HE preferred to live without the fingertip?

Here's a flip of my social fingertip to you, Michael!  You ask in your "movie":  "how did we get to the point where we deny medical care to people that will kill them"?


But now you want even MORE government SPENDING?????


.uck you


Not just .uck you, BUTT .UCK YOU!


If your "health care" dream comes true, I'm going to spend $60,000 of taxpayer's money to EXTEND my social finger by two inches so I can REALLY flip you the bird!!


I have seen the finest of 'SOCIALIZED MEDICINE", it's in RUSSIA, and if this is what you want, this is what you DESERVE--go there and get it, and leave US alone.



Anti-gun nut Michael Moore


Have you ever wondered what you're going to do about the most despicable American "citizen", the one who can't comprehend the wording or functionality or purpose of the Second Amendment, who instead runs around the countryside demanding that even more UN-constitutional "gun control laws" be added to our already existing 22,000 ineffective, unconstitutional, expensive, counterintuitive, fascist "gun control laws?

Well, cheer up, because the cavalry might be on its way.  They just knocked on Michael Moore's door--the MORON who gleefully bragged "people around the country [are] trying to get stores in their towns to ban the sale of bullets".

Flagrantly violating the spirit and intent of the US Constitution, whether it be guns or bullets, with nary a regard for the proper ratification process, is criminal stupidity, not just a "matter of opinion".   People who think they're American citizens, but who haven't taken the time to even understand that he would be speaking Japanese now if it weren't for the Second Amendment, deserve such a knock on the door.

Savor the moment.  Is it at all possible that ALL "liberals" will be visited by the Secret Service?

It's true that this might not be why they knocked on his door--but it's also true that it might be.

What a wonderful thought!





Rape By Our Democracy
Today, December 10, 2002 at approximately 1:00 pm EST, at my residence
1651 Goldston Carbonton Road, Goldston, NC, I noticed 2 then 3 then 4
cars enter my driveway. I went out to greet them and asked if I could
help them with something. The gentlemen introduced themselves by name
and stated that they were from the Secret Service, showed me their
identification, and then asked if I was Michael Moore. One of the other
gentlemen was the Chatham County Sheriff. The agents said that they work
with the FBI and the National Security Agency (NSA) jointly on national
security issues. One of the Secret Service agents (all were wearing side
arms) approached me with why they were here to see me, in that they
intercepted one of my email messages I had written to an online friend
expressing my outrage over the election results where I called Bush
"Satan" and that he's the "third anti-Christ" among other things. They
said that they had to assess the situation regarding my email to see if
I posed a national security risk to the President, whom I'll now call
I allowed them to come inside my home after they asked if they could,
because they needed to ask me some questions and fill out some forms,
which they said would take about 30 minutes of my time. Actual time was
more than an hour. They asked questions from "what drugs I am on" all
the way to my ex-wife's contact information. They had me to sign a form
to allow them access to all my medical history in the San Diego, CA
Veteran's Hospital and to the Veteran's Hospital in Durham, NC. They
asked for all my family member's names, addresses, and phone numbers. I
was also asked for any friend's names, addresses, and phone numbers.
They wanted to know if I had a history of mental illness, what I thought
about assassinations, was I going to Washington, DC to shoot the
president, when was the last time I was out of the state, had I had any
sniper training in the military, what work I did in the Navy, if I had a
grudge against the Navy, etc. They wrote down information from my
military Retiree's I.D. card, my driver's license, and my vehicle
license plate number. The Sheriff and one other man wandered through my
house casually everywhere while I was being interviewed by one of the
other Secret Service agents in my dining room. The agents wrote down all
my medication label information. When all of this was over, one of the
agents took 4 Polaroid pictures of me and asked me in a kind way to not
go to Washington, DC.
What kind of democracy is this in our "so-called" great nation when we
cannot even write an email message without the fear of our government
intercepting it and then being violently raped through an intense
personal and very sensitive interrogation? I was absolutely correct in
my interpretation of "Bush-Whacker," and this ordeal today is THE prime
example and proof of our democracy in the "Republic of the Divided
States of America".
Michael Moore 12/10/2002



November 27, 2002

Dear Friends,

It is Thanksgiving 2002 and it would seem that there is little to give
thanks for this year. W. has scored an unbelievable hat trick and is now
the first Republican since Eisenhower to control the House, the Senate and
the White House. There is no getting around just how damned demoralizing
and depressing this is. I wish there was a way to put a better face on what
has transpired, but my well of optimism is just about dry. Bush has his
"mandate" for war, his "mandate" for global frying, his "mandate" to turn
our government into his own private corporation.


Only about 20% of the American people showed up three weeks ago to vote for
a Republican. That's it. Just 20%. And about 19% voted for a Democrat (an
amazing number considering how few fights the Democrats put up around the

And 61% said, "To hell with all of them!" and refused to show up and vote.

I am not surprised this happened. My greatest fear after the 2000 election
was that the majority of Americans would just give up and say, "Why
bother?" If there was one message to the average American from Bush's theft
of the White House, it was this: "Not only doesn't your vote count, but
even if you do vote, we're not going to count it!" I fear millions earlier
this month saw the futility of exercising their right to govern when those
who did the governing decided that the will of the people could be disposed
of as easily as a drunk driving citation on a Kennebunkport back road.

Even worse, African Americans, whose right to vote was the most egregiously
violated (and who usually are the first to stand and fight injustice), seem
to have given up. Betrayed, forgotten and taken for granted by the
Democrats, black voters saw no reason to revolt in 2000-and little reason
to show up in 2002. They got the message loud and clear: "This is White
America-we call the shots, we run this place, so shut the f*** up and stay
home. The polls have closed for you."

Of course, those in charge are thrilled that 61% of the country has given
up. That's right where they want us-out of the way! And it is for that
reason alone why we must not now throw in the towel. If we sink into a
collective state of despair, disgust and disinterest, we are truly doomed.
Bush & Company (and this includes the Democrats) are all-too-happy to be
left alone to run amok in the candy store. And, in the end, here is what
we'll be left with: billions of impoverished people around the world hoping
for a chance to kill you and me someday!

Ok, so what do we do? Perhaps the silver lining in all this is that Bush
will actually think he has a "mandate" and pull such a big, stinking
whopper that his re-installation in 2004 will be rendered impossible. Or
perhaps some prosecutor somewhere will have the guts to indict him for the
insider trading he conducted while on the board of Harken Oil. Who knows. A
lot can happen in 23 months.

In the meantime, you, me, all of us, have to get together and come up with
a plan that gets this country back in our hands. I have a few ideas. I'll
bet you do, too. Why don't we have an online brainstorming session from now
through the holidays? I'll set up a thread on my forum at for you to post your
comments and to generate a discussion about what we do for 2004.

        Or, if you want to send me your thoughts directly, email me at
[email protected] I've just learned the site is getting over 2 million
hits a day. Right now, 2,000,000 heads certainly feel better than one.

Pass the turkey.

Michael Moore
[email protected]

P.S. Thanks to all of you who continue to pack the theatres for "Bowling
for Columbine." It has now broken the all-time box office record for a
documentary in America. I am not only grateful for this, but I am thrilled
that it has ignited a national discussion about guns, violence, the NRA,
racism, why the Canadians don't lock their doors, and the insane
preparation for an expanded war in Iraq. I am now getting reports of people
around the country trying to get stores in their towns to ban the sale of
bullets. The NRA candidates lost the race for Governor in Michigan,
Pennsylvania and Illinois (three hunting states). The film continues to set
box office records in the UK, France and elsewhere. And, next week, "Stupid
White Men" begins its 10th month on the best-seller list. Thank you all so
much. Have a happy Thanksgiving.



Michael Moore's Utopian Nightmare

Written by Jeff Holder (Saturday, 26 September 2009 11:33)

Articles - Main

By Dr. Ted Baehr and Dr. Tom Snyder

If only he would use his talent for goodness instead of evil!

That is a paraphrased comic statement that Secret Agent Maxwell Smart often used to describe some of the super-villains he faced on the TV spy show GET SMART in the 1960s. The same statement may be applied to Michael Moore, the filmmaking darling of the Left who has made another polemical documentary, CAPITALISM: A LOVE STORY, this time calling for the replacement of America's capitalist system with a socialist system, including, of course, pro-communist proposals to share all wealth or profits equally.

A talented filmmaker, Moore begins his latest movie by discussing the post-war economic boom in the United States in the 1950s and early 60s. After showing the consumerism that captivated many Americans during those times, and the riches that came to the leaders of industry and the wealthy bankers and brokers on Wall Street, he cuts to a shot of President Jimmy Carter during the late 1970s sadly complaining about the "greed" and "materialism" of America. Then, in a mocking tone, Moore says Ronald Reagan came riding into the White House, but that Reagan and his Treasury Secretary, Donald Reagan, formerly of Merrill Lynch, designed policies that hurt blue collar workers and encouraged Americans to borrow too much money so they could buy homes and modern luxuries, while the "fatcats" on Wall Street got richer and richer.

Interspersed within this somewhat biased history lesson, Moore describes the economic "meltdown" that occurred last year. While putting all the blame on bankers, mortgage lenders and financial institutions who, he says, corrupt the politicians in Washington, Moore visits several families and workers harmed by the economic collapse. Included among these scenes are people whose mortgages have been foreclosed, a family that is defiantly still living in its foreclosed home, and workers in Chicago who took action when their company suddenly went bankrupt and refused to pay the workers what it apparently still owed them.

Finally, the movie promotes a socialist vision with a Communist polemic advocating sharing the wealth equally. During these scenes, Moore, several Catholic priests and a Catholic bishop cite Jesus Christ's concern for the poor and needy as inspiration, while declaring unequivocally that capitalism is clearly evil and unbiblical. Moore also cites for inspiration President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's speech calling for a "second bill of rights," including the right to adequate healthcare, an adequate and fulfilling job, a full retirement plan, a home, and, if you own a business, a fair price for your goods and services.

The best, most coherent and perhaps most truthful part of the movie is Moore's attack on the government bailouts for Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs, Citicorp, the Bank of America, AIG, etc. He correctly notes that these bailouts don't seem to have done much of anything for the people who have lost their jobs and their homes. Furthermore, he clearly shows that the government doesn't have a clue where exactly the money went. Moreover, he shows that members of Congress are in on this and other alleged Wall Street con games, including Democratic Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut. Of course, President Obama also seems to be fully involved in these allegedly corrupt schemes, but Moore lets the President off the hook because he apparently loves Obama soaring, but phony leftist rhetoric of radical "Hope and Change."

The rest of Moore's movie, however, presents a very strong, somewhat mixed pagan worldview with very strong politically correct, leftist ideology. Although Moore includes overt, positive references to Jesus Christ and the Bible, including the crucifixion, he uses these references to promote his radical, anti-capitalist, pro-socialist, and even Communist socio-political philosophy. It's all extremely polemical and one-sided in a deceitful way that will fool many gullible people, especially many young people.

The good news is that one older liberal/leftist journalist at the screening attended by MOVIEGUIDE� admitted that he didn't think Moore proved his point either, mainly because the movie is so one-sided. He said Moore would have done a better job if he had included, in some way, a bit of give-and-take between himself and some experts or other people who actually believe in capitalism and who are opposed to Moore's radical socialist utopia.

To help inform and equip the public, here are some of the problems that MOVIEGUIDE� found in watching Michael Moore's CAPITALISM: A LOVE STORY.

Problems with Michael Moore's new movie:

1) Michael Moore's presentation in CAPITALISM: A LOVE STORY is one sided and unduly biased because it never provides a chance for his opponents to make their own case. Thus, he never interviews economists, much less any renowned conservative or libertarian economists, who support a capitalist system. Nor does he interview Christians or Christian capitalists who disagree with the Social Gospel of Liberation Theology and the Liberation Theologians and anti-capitalist, pro-socialist Catholic theologians Moore interviews. In a court of law, both sides get to present their case completely before the jury begins its deliberations. That is not the case with every movie, especially the movies that Michael Moore has made, including this one.

2) Thus, the movie is also guilty of special pleading - it only cites facts, arguments and opinions that agree with Moore's political ideology, economic views and theology.

3) The anti-capitalist, pro-socialist Catholic priests and bishop Moore interviews repeatedly tell him that capitalism is evil and must be eliminated. They and Moore himself refer to statements Jesus Christ made about taking care of the poor and needy. They also refer to the incident of the rich young man in Matthew 19:16-30, who Jesus advises in Verse 21, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." Of course, neither Michael Moore nor these Catholic officials mention that last sentence about following Jesus Christ. Furthermore, nowhere in this passage does Jesus turn to a government official armed or unarmed and say, "Take this man's possessions, sell them all and give all the money to the poor." Nor do Jesus and His disciples in this passage (or anywhere else in the New Testament documents for that matter) promote a welfare state run by governments. In fact, in most of the English translations of this passage, Jesus never actually tells the rich man to give away every single cent from the sale to the poor and needy (presumably, the rich young man was allowed to keep some of the money of the sale to pay for his personal food, clothing and shelter while he and the other disciples followed Jesus). Also, it is possible that a rich man might have poor and needy family members, so may not such family members be included in Jesus Christ's admonition to give money to the poor? Finally, even though the rich young man walks away sad because he liked his wealth and Jesus tells his disciples, "It is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven," Jesus does not tell them that it is impossible. In fact, he actually says in Verse 26, "With God all things are possible." Thus, it may be extremely hard for a rich man to enter heaven, but it is not impossible, especially if you follow God through Jesus Christ.

4) The movie assumes that all the Wall Street companies, millionaires and billionaires that the movie attacks never give away any of their personal or company profits to charity or church (their own churches or other churches and synagogues) and never use their personal profit to support members of their family who may be poor, or much less wealthy.

5) The movie also assumes that the profits of banks or financial investment firms are never used to loan money to other kinds of businesses, either new ones or old ones.

6) Moore slams the wealthiest top one percent Americans for being greedy and having too much wealth compared to the other 99 percent or the bottom 95 percent, but he doesn't mention that, according to the most recent figures from the Internal Revenue Service reported by THE NEW YORK TIMES on July 30, 2009, the top one percent of the wealthiest Americans paid 40.42 percent of the total federal income taxes in 2007, while the bottom 95% paid only about 39 percent and the poorest Americans paid very little or nothing.1 Of course, to be fair, the wealthiest people in the United States, before the recent economic meltdown, saw their income grow much greater than the people toward the bottom, but also, many wealthy people working on Wall Street have lost billions or millions of dollars in the current recession. Even so, this argument about whether the federal tax system is fair has nothing to do with questions regarding government-run welfare and education programs, such as, Are these programs worthwhile and moral in the first place?

7) At the end of the movie, Michael Moore overtly advocates the elimination of the capitalist system, but his movie only implies that he would replace capitalism with Big Government socialist programs and business cooperatives where each worker has an equal share of the profits, but it is short on the details. For example, he doesn't really say how the socialist programs would work, where the money would come from, or how the government would set prices for the healthcare services and houses the government would provide, or the wages and benefits that are handed out.

8) He shows President Franklin D. Roosevelt's speech advocating a second bill of rights declaring that each citizen has the right to such things as adequate housing, an adequate job with a decent standard of living, proper healthcare (presumably through a government-run national healthcare system), and adequate provision for one's retirement, but, again, no details are offered as to how all this could and would be achieved.

9) Though he notes that the public was generally opposed to the bailouts of the big banks, mortgage companies and financial institutions, Moore fails to note that Republican, conservative and libertarian voters were among the most vocal ones opposing the bailouts.

10) Although one of Moore's interview subjects notes that current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was the Federal Reserve official in New York whose incompetence is primarily responsible for the sudden financial meltdown on Wall Street, Moore lets President Obama off the hook for appointing Geithner because Moore thinks Obama supports Moore's anti-capitalist, socialist ideology in some way.

11) Although Moore lambastes Goldman Sachs for its allegedly corrupt influence in Washington D.C., he again lets Obama off the hook, even though Obama has appointed former Goldman Sachs officials as part of his economic team!

12) Although Moore blasts Wall Street banks, financial institutions and mortgage companies like Citicorp, Merrill Lynch, AIG, and Bank of America, and attacks the bailouts they received, he again lets President Obama off the hook for supporting bailouts.

13) Moore fails to note that, according to many economic and public policy experts, it was actually the socialist housing policies and regulations of Democratic presidents FDR, LBJ, Carter, and Clinton, and Democratic Congressmen and senators like Rep. Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Charles Schumer, not just the lack of action by President Bush to roll back these policies and regulations, that mainly caused the meltdown in the housing market. Thus, sound capitalistic policies and regulations, and deregulation, had little or nothing to do with the housing meltdown.

14) Moore uses anecdotal evidence of individuals in dire economic straits to create sympathy for the anti-capitalist, pro-socialist and anti-corruption viewpoint in his movie, but this kind of argument or "evidence" does not prove his point since anecdotal information is a fallacious way to prove a point because it can only serve as an example, not as part of a deductive argument using logic or an inductive argument using facts, documentation and science.

15) Moore also uses emotional arguments and appeals to pity for these suffering individuals to convince viewers of his anti-capitalist, pro-socialist viewpoint, but, here again, such irrational arguments are fallacious. An appeal to pity or emotion does not invalidate your argument, but neither does it validate it.

16) Moore claims that the United States Constitution does not establish a capitalist system but instead advocates a Democratic Socialist one. He points to the phrase "We the People," and the phrase "to support the general welfare" to prove his point, but he forgets the commerce clause that appears later in the document and he forgets the Fifth Amendment, which supports the "right to property" and the "right to liberty." Also, no less a person than James Madison, the fourth president who is often also called "The Father of the Constitution" said on Feb 6, 1792 in a speech before Congress that this is not what the words "general welfare" mean. In fact, Madison says that federal aid to education and the poor, and federal regulation of roads, are both unconstitutional and anti-American:



"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress. . . . Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundation, and transmute the very nature of the limited Government established by the people of America." - James Madison, The Papers of James Madison, Vol. 14 (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1983), pages 223-224.



1. Catherine Rampell, "Top 1% Paid More in Federal Income Taxes Than Bottom 95% in '07," NEW YORK TIMES, July 30, 2009.



horizontal rule



I have nothing more than a high school degree. But back when I was in school, every student had to take one semester of economics in order to graduate. And here's what I learned: Money doesn't grow on trees. It grows when we make things. It grows when we have good jobs with good wages that we use to buy the things we need and thus create more jobs. It grows when we provide an outstanding educational system that then grows a new generation of inventers, entrepreneurs, artists, scientists and thinkers who come up with the next great idea for the planet. And that new idea creates new jobs and that creates revenue for the state. But if those who have the most money don't pay their fair share of taxes, the state can't function. The schools can't produce the best and the brightest who will go on to create those jobs. If the wealthy get to keep most of their money, we have seen what they will do with it: recklessly gamble it on crazy Wall Street schemes and crash our economy. The crash they created cost us millions of jobs. That too caused a reduction in revenue. And the population ended up suffering because they reduced their taxes, reduced our jobs and took wealth out of the system, removing it from circulation.

The nation is not broke, my friends. Wisconsin is not broke. It's part of the Big Lie. It's one of the three biggest lies of the decade: America/Wisconsin is broke, Iraq has WMD, the Packers can't win the Super Bowl without Brett Favre.

The truth is, there's lots of money to go around. LOTS. It's just that those in charge have diverted that wealth into a deep well that sits on their well-guarded estates. They know they have committed crimes to make this happen and they know that someday you may want to see some of that money that used to be yours. So they have bought and paid for hundreds of politicians across the country to do their bidding for them. But just in case that doesn't work, they've got their gated communities, and the luxury jet is always fully fueled, the engines running, waiting for that day they hope never comes. To help prevent that day when the people demand their country back, the wealthy have done two very smart things:

1. They control the message. By owning most of the media they have expertly convinced many Americans of few means to buy their version of the American Dream and to vote for their politicians. Their version of the Dream says that you, too, might be rich some day � this is America, where anything can happen if you just apply yourself! They have conveniently provided you with believable examples to show you how a poor boy can become a rich man, how the child of a single mother in Hawaii can become president, how a guy with a high school education can become a successful filmmaker. They will play these stories for you over and over again all day long so that the last thing you will want to do is upset the apple cart -- because you -- yes, you, too! -- might be rich/president/an Oscar-winner some day! The message is clear: keep your head down, your nose to the grindstone, don't rock the boat and be sure to vote for the party that protects the rich man that you might be some day.

2. They have created a poison pill that they know you will never want to take. It is their version of mutually assured destruction. And when they threatened to release this weapon of mass economic annihilation in September of 2008, we blinked. As the economy and the stock market went into a tailspin, and the banks were caught conducting a worldwide Ponzi scheme, Wall Street issued this threat: Either hand over trillions of dollars from the American taxpayers or we will crash this economy straight into the ground. Fork it over or it's Goodbye savings accounts. Goodbye pensions. Goodbye United States Treasury. Goodbye jobs and homes and future. It was friggin' awesome and it scared the shit out of everyone. "Here! Take our money! We don't care. We'll even print more for you! Just take it! But, please, leave our lives alone, PLEASE!"

The executives in the board rooms and hedge funds could not contain their laughter, their glee, and within three months they were writing each other huge bonus checks and marveling at how perfectly they had played a nation full of suckers. Millions lost their jobs anyway, and millions lost their homes. But there was no revolt (see #1).

Until now. On Wisconsin! Never has a Michigander been more happy to share a big, great lake with you! You have aroused the sleeping giant know as the working people of the United States of America. Right now the earth is shaking and the ground is shifting under the feet of those who are in charge. Your message has inspired people in all 50 states and that message is: WE HAVE HAD IT! We reject anyone tells us America is broke and broken. It's just the opposite! We are rich with talent and ideas and hard work and, yes, love. Love and compassion toward those who have, through no fault of their own, ended up as the least among us. But they still crave what we all crave: Our country back! Our democracy back! Our good name back! The United States of America. NOT the Corporate States of America. The United States of America!

So how do we get this? Well, we do it with a little bit of Egypt here, a little bit of Madison there. And let us pause for a moment and remember that it was a poor man with a fruit stand in Tunisia who gave his life so that the world might focus its attention on how a government run by billionaires for billionaires is an affront to freedom and morality and humanity.

Thank you, Wisconsin. You have made people realize this was our last best chance to grab the final thread of what was left of who we are as Americans. For three weeks you have stood in the cold, slept on the floor, skipped out of town to Illinois -- whatever it took, you have done it, and one thing is for certain: Madison is only the beginning. The smug rich have overplayed their hand. They couldn't have just been content with the money they raided from the treasury. They couldn't be satiated by simply removing millions of jobs and shipping them overseas to exploit the poor elsewhere. No, they had to have more � something more than all the riches in the world. They had to have our soul. They had to strip us of our dignity. They had to shut us up and shut us down so that we could not even sit at a table with them and bargain about simple things like classroom size or bulletproof vests for everyone on the police force or letting a pilot just get a few extra hours sleep so he or she can do their job -- their $19,000 a year job. That's how much some rookie pilots on commuter airlines make, maybe even the rookie pilots flying people here to Madison. But he's stopped trying to get better pay. All he asks is that he doesn't have to sleep in his car between shifts at O'Hare airport. That's how despicably low we have sunk. The wealthy couldn't be content with just paying this man $19,000 a year. They wanted to take away his sleep. They wanted to demean and dehumanize him. After all, he's just another slob.

And that, my friends, is Corporate America's fatal mistake. But trying to destroy us they have given birth to a movement -- a movement that is becoming a massive, nonviolent revolt across the country. We all knew there had to be a breaking point some day, and that point is upon us. Many people in the media don't understand this. They say they were caught off guard about Egypt, never saw it coming. Now they act surprised and flummoxed about why so many hundreds of thousands have come to Madison over the last three weeks during brutal winter weather. "Why are they all standing out there in the cold? I mean there was that election in November and that was supposed to be that!

"There's something happening here, and you don't know what it is, do you...?"

America ain't broke! The only thing that's broke is the moral compass of the rulers. And we aim to fix that compass and steer the ship ourselves from now on. Never forget, as long as that Constitution of ours still stands, it's one person, one vote, and it's the thing the rich hate most about America -- because even though they seem to hold all the money and all the cards, they begrudgingly know this one unshakeable basic fact: There are more of us than there are of them!

Madison, do not retreat. We are with you. We will win together.

Follow Michael Moore on Twitter:




GezaCsath 02:33 AM on 4/01/2011
"Economic Mobility in America" (PDF)

"Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%" Vanity Fare

Michael Moore is a friggin' national treasure. I only wish he'd slim down and take care of his health so we'd have him for longer. But anyways, THANKS MIKE! YOU ROCK!!!!
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
I find it interestin�g that the very things that you claim would bring money to the middle class have not prevented but, rather, accelerate�d the disparity between the rich and poor. It seems likely, than, that you should not be in support of this legislatio�n if similar policy has lead to an expansion of the Gini Coefficien�t.
Look, Mr Moore, when John Boehner says that America is broke, he is correct. We are very close to our debt ceiling of $14t, which is nearing 100% of GDP. Usually, owing debt equal to your assets counts as broke. You think we have it bad now? Hoo boy, you better be ready for 2050, baby. Can you say $100t in unfunded liabilitie�s? That's the CBO talking, and it's usually conservati�ve (which is a nice word for optimistic�ally wrong by a long margin) on long term effects.
There is no way to reasonably justify that the CEO of Foresight Energy LLC, who worked for years in a coal mine, is not deserving of his wealth, while Stuart Mantel, a teacher who pulled a chair from under his student for not answering his angry diatribe but cannot be fired due to the union strangleho�ld on New Jersey schools, is.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
myrtle1909 08:10 PM on 3/18/2011
I agree. Mr. Boehner can say the Country is broke all day long but it dosen't make it so. When the republican�s insisted on extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy I knew that talk about the Government being broke was just a bunch of bu--. You do not delibertel�y add 700 billion to the deficit if the Government is broke.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
Yes, when you think about what it costs to get elected compared to what the job pays there is a serious imbalance. It seems the more often than not, he who spends the most wins. Who fills the void? Our friends the corporatio�ns. How long can the newly elected politician�s stay honest and focused on serving the people? Capitalism at it's finest! We can't be sheep and accept what the political adds say. We have to be involved or loose.

The real trick is how do we get the wolf out of the chicken pen. It's going to hurt but it will hurt more if we continue doing nothing.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
checkmoot 10:36 PM on 3/13/2011
One man one vote, that is until the Republican�s on the Supreme Court decided that a corporatio�n was actually a person with all the rights of a person.
Favorite (2)Flag as Abusive
b thunder555 10:27 PM on 3/13/2011
3-step "fix"

1. (prelude) Sell/cash out of all your stock and bond investment�s, including 401(k) and IRA. Keep your "money" in savings accounts. Buy precious metals if possible.
2. (prelude) Make YOUR money unreachabl�e for the Wall Street and Big Banks: move the money to small regional banks and credit unions. Move money abroad if possible.
3. (the main part) GENERAL STRIKE. "Atlas Shrugged" in reverse. See how long the rich and their wholly owned politician�s will be able to maintain control, especially after markets plunge, housekeepe�rs don't come to work, and chauffeurs are nowhere to be found.
P.S. Do not let the criminal institutio�ns such as Fed and the US Treasury to bail out their "friends" again. The people who run those institutio�ns must be removed and indicted. It is essential to find some prosecutor�s with "balls."
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
caneca 10:11 PM on 3/13/2011
Michael Moore is wrong to call this a "financial coup d'etat". A coup d'etat implies an involuntar�y transfer of power.
First, there was no real transfer of power here. The rich have always held the power in this country. They just were given the green light to abuse that power to greatly increase their riches at the expense of the American middle class.
Second, it wasn't an entirely involuntar�y peocess, as a significan�t portion of the American middle class have supported (and continue to support) the political organizati�on(s) that made that transfer of wealth possible.T�he American middle class have voted (and continue to vote) against their financial self interest.I�n large part that is because thay have been bamboozled to support moral causes (anti-gay legislatio�ns, Evangelist political agendas, etc) at the expense of their economic best interests.
Favorite (1)Flag as Abusive
gregval14 10:20 PM on 3/13/2011
Amen, Caneca. Well said.
That is a continuing problem for the US, the moral causes of many Repub voters has blinded them to the real problem they have, which is they will be totally broke very soon.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
Lakjaw 11:11 PM on 3/15/2011
Well-state�d. Thanks for making those points.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
Peter Klatt 03:23 PM on 3/22/2011
What's the matter with Kansas?
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
DSOTM 06:12 PM on 3/22/2011
Until we have 65% unemployme�nt, rampant homelessne�ss, mass starvation and no essential services, then and only then will people wake up, but America probably wont exist as a nation when that day comes.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
jacobisrael 03:20 PM on 4/01/2011
America already doesn't exist as a nation.

When you can't even raise enough personal income tax revenue to pay the INTEREST on the public debt, YOU ARE DEAD.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive

Write something about the law just passed in Michigan--�PLEASE!

The media blackout is deafening.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
EllaMai 09:22 PM on 3/13/2011
Everyone needs to watch "Inside Job", and they need to do it soon. The American government is the tool of choice for Wall Street, and they don't care about poor people. Don't expect change with the current government or the next unless the citizens vote in people with no corporate ties that will actually make change happen.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
Bflobaz 08:45 PM on 3/13/2011
Its ONLY the US Constituti�on and ONLY a contract -- which corporatio�ns throw under the bus when it suits their needs (i.e. abrogate pension obligation�s; akin to stealing our retirement investment�s and homes). If pension obligation�s and Social Security were overseen by a Surrogate'�s Court; such as Guardiansh�ips or Estates and similarly defrauded or mismanaged�, the Trustee or Executor would be held in contempt, fined or jailed.

Unions? Bust 'em! Isn't that the Conservati�ve mantra? God forbid someone exercise the right of assembly and petition the government or pool resources to obtain basic workers health, safety, benefits or other rights? Does anyone think there would have been a need for unions -- BUT FOR the horrendous working conditions people have endured in fields and factories during the whole of human experience�?

What's good for the goose must be good for the gander, right? Then "Bust the Chamber of Commerce". Isn't it a "union" formed to advance business interests by using the power of many to do more effectivel�y than an individual entity standing alone? Why should they have a right to Petition the government to advance their economic interests if workers are prohibited�?

Just asking -- not trying to start a revolution -- except seeking some very public "Perp Walks" [read: "justice"] by some Wall Street execs and DC pols. Well, that and meaningful campaign reform, including overturnin�g Citizens United.
Favorite (1)Flag as Abusive
realitytrumpsbull 09:31 PM on 3/13/2011
Show me the facts. I want to see hard figures. I have read/heard all the rhetoric on this I think is appropriat�e to listen to, now let's get down to brass tacks, dollars and cents, and have this issue out 'on the table'. Let's see a state-by-s�tate budget report. Then, up to the federal level, and go through all the budget informatio�n like we were seriously trying to make some positive changes. Failing that, forget it. This poster is talking about the Constituti�on, and how corporatio�ns 'throw it under the bus'. Oh? Really? So print a new copy. Big deal. The Founders never reckoned with mega-multi�nationals, or a 12K DOW, 7 billion people in the world, or anything like that. They did what they thought was right, back in the day. And, back then, you went out and pretty much shot your own food, or grew it, or put a line in the water, and caught it. Our modern world is more complex, and we sort of live in a Big Money Machine. And, to get money, you need to work. And, if you run around at the jobsite when you're being paid to do something, waving various pieces of paper, instead of helping the customer on aisle four, or completing that project or inventory or making your delivery or whatever, your HR manager is left with making the Unpleasant Decision of firing you, for cause, for non-perfor�mance, and trying to import a lot of politics onto the job. And, if it's union stuff? Oh boy, here comes the DEEP b.s., and people basically claiming they're entitled to a job for the rest of their lives etc. GM just about 'went away' on account they could no longer afford the unions' demands. Unions aren't necessaril�y always a force for the good. And, some are more interested in what they can get out of their members' wallets, than anything else. Read, study, ask questions, or watch more and more corporatio�ns do what's necessary to protect themselves�, like leave the United States completely�, sell off and do something else, or bring in people from overseas to do the job that union people just won't do. 6.9 billion potential competitor�s out there, no pressure, no pressure..�.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
peaceandfreedom 10:01 PM on 3/13/2011
GM almost went away because they wouldn't or couldn't build cars people wanted to buy.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
Bflobaz 06:09 PM on 3/14/2011
Thank you for taking the time to reply and provide your thoughts on the matter. However, we seem to disagree on certain points. Labor and unions have been taking the brunt of the "blame" for more than a generation�, but I repeat that we'd not need unions IF employers treated their workers half-way decently. The word count on the Post limits a much more detailed analysis than the writers of their articles; so our opinions are what they are -- often less than in-depth.

In response to your reply: 1) Please read: http://www�.huffingto��dean-baker�/the-key-t�o-rebuildi�ng-wor_b_8�35607.html and 2) the problem is greater than Dem or Repub or liberal, progressiv�e or conservati�ve philosophi�es. It has a deeper spiritual causation; not likely cured by everyone going to Church each Sunday because we've our fair share of those making a mockery of what they hear on Sunday during the balance of the week.

No, we need to recognize we're ALL in this boat we call life "together"�. Until we see ourselves and this planet as our extended family, we're going to be acting out of a greed and fear-based human ego driven personna, the curse of humanity since the dawn of time. Ownership/�management isn't superior to labor and each and every operation needs to be more efficient and reduce/eli�minate the corruption so common in human relations -- personal, social or commercial�.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
graceaustin 04:16 PM on 3/13/2011
LOL, Moore agrees with me. I've been saying we aren't broke for a very long time. No one listens, but whatever. I know I'm right, so that's good enough for me.
Favorite (1)Flag as Abusive
skittle 09:59 PM on 3/13/2011
well, if you and Michael Moore say so...who could argue?
Favorite (1)Flag as Abusive
nomadicexpat 03:45 PM on 3/13/2011
while i agree in most of what you are saying, i think you are the worst possible messenger. you are a polarizing figure, with a tainted reputation and your insistence in merging banker bashing with this political fight i think does no one any good. alot of bankers are on the side of the unions. this is a political flight and the bankers are not all on the other side of the fence, yet
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
frank day 04:58 PM on 3/13/2011
Tainted reputation�?
You must listen to AM radio.
Favorite (2)Flag as Abusive
larry putman 02:19 PM on 3/13/2011
Look the tax structure is designed to repay businesses electoral support, tax loopholes are not accidental�, but will shift as new administra�tions are elected.
Even Pres. Clinton gave one of the biggest tax breaks to the rich when he reduced the Capital Gains tax by 60%.
People sometimes make things into what they are not to substantia�te a degree of plausible deniabilit�y.
Favorite (1)Flag as Abusive
larry putman 02:43 PM on 3/13/2011
One more thing, the lack of economic knowledge on this site astonishes me.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
GreenDragon 08:53 PM on 3/13/2011
MM is not everyone's cup-of-tea�, for sure. But here's some economic knowledge for you,�dividuals earning over $400,000.0�0 were income-tax�ed at marginal rates in the high 80 percentile to low 90 percentile on those 400K+ earnings in the late 1950's. While that seems a bit extreme, consider that individual�s earning $3M ($400K in 1958 dollars, adjusted for inflation) today pay a marginal rate of one-third (or less) of that. That is also extreme. There's nothing socialist or psychotic about expecting high net-worth individual�s to pay a larger share of their wealth to support the workings of the socio-econ�omic-polit�ical-marke�t infrastruc�ture that likely made that wealth possible in the first place. That's not a dirty, anti-Ameri�can idea, it's the way 9/10ths of the world's successful democracie�s work. And if/when enough our sleepy countrymen wake-up to these facts, there will indeed be some boat-rocki�ng. Frankly, it's long, long overdue.
Favorite (2)Flag as Abusive
gypsy508 02:04 PM on 3/13/2011
We need competitio�n in this country and the more the wealthy few control things, the more of the market they corner. That's not competitio�n. It is not a goal for the rich to become wealthy by making superior products, they want to create a monopoly so that they can then reduce the quality of their products (mostly they got rich through better marketing anyway). People here deride the economics of communism but what's the difference between one party and one company running an industry?
Favorite (1)Flag as Abusive
RedLeg2 02:18 PM on 3/13/2011
if only they made products! the finance industry makes bupkis and turns a profit.
Favorite (2)Flag as Abusive
learneddemocrat 02:26 PM on 3/13/2011
Why didn't you include GM in your comment. The say they made a profit, they have not paid back all the bailout yet they gave huge bonuses to their union bosses and others. This is different why?
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
larry putman 03:27 PM on 3/13/2011
The NEA is a monopoly.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
LeftRight 06:35 PM on 3/13/2011
The NEA isn't a business, but thanks for playing.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive
marthamothra 01:47 PM on 3/13/2011
Michael, thank you for again speaking the truth. Thank you for GOING to Wisconsin, not just writing a blog, and giving hope to these workers, all of us workers. I am here at my computer, listening to you on a Youtube video, and my husband says: "a rabble-rou�ser", and I said: "no, a truth-tell�er, as always." And he agreed. Thank you Michael Moore, for all you do.






jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition


Hit Counter


Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party