xmas3.gif (5351 bytes)



protocolszion.gif (47307 bytes)



"The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now." --Henry Ford, 2-17-21, whose newspaper, the Dearborn Independent, cited the Protocols as evidence of an alleged Jewish threat until at least 1927

"To what extent the whole existence of this people is based on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion...." --Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf

"No serious study of history, politics, culture, or religion can be complete without a thorough examination of the Protocols. Contemporary thinkers, educators, and activists will find in this historic document, evidence of a sinister conspiracy that is as old as Biblical times. From it's inception and the moment that the plot was hatched it has had some far-reaching implications; shaping and influencing historical events as well as the global socio-economic and indeed political genre. It has become increasingly clear that the conspiracy revealed in the Protocols is alive and well.....impacting our society today and perhaps well into the future."----Jamaaluddin al-Haidar, al-Bayan

"These documents attracted only a little attention before the Revolution of 1917. The astounding breakdown of a great state due to attack by Bolshiviks and the presence of countless Jews among them, had the result that many people were looking for - reasonable explanations of the catastrophe. The "Protocols" furnished this explanation, especially as the tactics of the Bolsheviks at many points, were identical with the recommendations of the "Protocols." The London "Times", August 17, 1921

"This movement among the JEWS is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), THIS WORLD-WIDE CONSPIRACY FOR THE OVERTHROW OF CIVILIZATION AND FOR THE RECONSTITUTION OF SOCIETY ON THE BASIS OF ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT, OF ENVIOUS MALEVOLENCE, AND IMPOSSIBLE EQUALITY, HAS BEEN STEADILY GROWING." Winston Churchill in Illustrated Sunday Herald, 8th February, 1920.


These "protocols" are very revealing of the nature of jews, not because they themselves have been proven to be completely accurate, but because of the duplicitous manner in which jews deal with them.  If Christians believed that such writings were a fraud, as jews claim that the "protocols" are, then Christians would welcome wide open public debate about them to prove their case.  But that's not what jews do.  Instead, jews claim in one sentence that they don't want to boycott bookstores which carry the "protocols", and in the very next breath call for a boycott of those same bookstores.

Consider the following statement from http://aish.com/issues/protocols_petition.asp

We are not being alarmist and are not calling for a boycott. We are voicing our opinion and asking that you stop selling the book.

Now consider the next page of that url which asks the question:

Should Barnes & Noble and Amazon be boycotted or congratulated for selling "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion"? Tell us what you think.

Well, I'll tell you what I think.  I think you should decide which side of the fence you are on and stick to your guns.  Either tell B&N that you are going to boycott them and quit claiming that you aren't, or tell them that you are NOT going to boycott them and quit promoting a boycott.

This duplicity is the classic demonstration of the very valid concerns of those who wrote the "protocols" in the first place.  The credibility of the "protocols" is enhanced rather than diminished by the hyper-emotional reaction they elicit from jews. If they were a clear fraud, and if a reasonable person reading them could easily detect that they are a fraud, then there is nothing that jews could do better to discredit them than to promote them wildly. Instead, jews go to great lengths to censor all discussion and silence the debaters by accusing them of "hate".   This childish reaction alone makes a thorough reading of the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" a very worthwhile endeavor for Christians.

We all know why they don't, of course.  We all know that jews know that the "protocols" strike too close to the truth.  We all know that the jews know that the "protocols" are a perfect reflection of the tenets of the Talmud.  Jews aren't worried that people will think that the "protocols" are an exact reflection of a meeting between jews, but that this will raise legitimate questions about the philosophy outlined in the Talmud.  It is not the "protocols" which jews don't want an open debate about, it is the Talmud.

As jews succeed in censoring links to other articles about the "protocols", other links pop up on the internet faster than they can count.  Most of the following links are still active: