Some great points, esp about Eastern Europe & Afrca - thank you. But India is not included in this study since they are not East Asians. Rushton was "studying" Mongoloid race which does not include Indians/Pakistanis, etc. IQ tests are a joke & not scientific.

+Sel am race deniers are a joke, equalizers a joke and all manner of PC diversity worshiping multicultural marxists are a threat to humanity as they marginalize and attempt this tolerance of inferiority for all agenda...

Ethiopia is inferior, WAY inferior - wouldn't u say?  would u like to see RICHARD LYNN's global IQ charts?  just a joke right?  i mean they reflect history, income, success and failure, all wrapped up in the single best predictive outcome variable called INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT... hardly a joke, the best metric we have...  

so help us all CELEBRATE EXCLUSIVITY, the high IQ folks... 

and tell me, if u were forced to start humanity all over again, by some cruel ETs in some sci fi scenario where they are going to kill most all humans on earth as part of a cosmic betting pool that has chosen u for the task:  u can only choose 1000 people, but all u have to go by is IQ... would u choose the highest 1000, the lowest... or maybe u have some IDEAL number thats not "too high"?

lets say in the americas, our lowest IQ nation, Haiti, with a 72 IQ as it is the blackest country we have in the americas... and lets say one of our 104 IQ states in the north east... u could only choose randomly from one of these nations/states, which would u choose?

+Trebol Bajo the presumption is false... it is well known that u can add around 14 IQ points (an average gain if u put your mind to it... whereas low IQ people can't gain that much and higher IQ people can actually gain more!

so the static argument against IQ doesn't work... no PROiqers are claiming IQ should be static - its malleable, thus hope for all ;)

blacks CAN NOT do as well, as per your scenario of hypothetical equal opportunity... this is proven many times over... under the same conditions they fail the worst... in fact highly advantaged rich black kids STILL do worse than white trash kids (SAT).... i have the data on this...

also WITHOUT white genetic influx of over 18% in the average black american they would do much worse without this hybrid vigor (heterosis) 

- IQ can decline with age, it almost always does... 20 point drops are not unheard of... your brain can shrink about 15%... so live long enough and this will happen... kind of like cataracts... 

- also the idea of IQ not a measure of intelligence - as u give some credit to the silly idea of cultural differences as to IQ... this is a minimal effect, as universal as much of the IQ testing is i can hardly ever see this as an excuse... it IS a reason, such that some rare niche cultures, like amazonian indians and some african tribes have VERY few words for numbers - one through three and more than three... no need beyond that for some people!  but they STILL count don't they?  in their own retarded minimal math way ;)

+Trebol Bajo LOL... with over 60 variables accounted for as to r/K selection theory and really just outlining the stark contrasts of race, you'd think MAYBE there is at least somewhat of a bit of a subtle hint as to the predictive outcomes of different races and their ability to form a successful civilization ;)  gotta read between the lines or is it GLARINGLY obvious? ;)

i suggest u read his book, or at least broach the free online PDF abridged version of "RACE, EVOLUTION AND BEHAVIOR"

+Trebol Bajo interestingly in a recent survey 53% of hispanics in USA self identified as white, so the FBI combining hispanics into white states partially works, but to whites like me (NW euro) we are bothered by looking worse, as hispanics have MUCH higher crime rates... 

JARED TAYLOR of AMREN fame talks about this in detail...

THE COLOR OF CRIME, u can go to that site... and watch my race and crime video with him talking about hispanic/white problems as to reporting the crime data...

culture is born of IQ, IQ is born of culture - poverty creates crime, crime creates poverty... u need to look at many of these simplistic two variable equations as bidirectional as to cause - works both ways...  which one effects the other the most is the debate - we know the Sun has more gravitational effect on the earth than the reverse, but the earth does effect the sun...

lower IQ people have crappier cultures... period.  EN PUNTO!

here is the SAT data: 1600 point scale

The College Board's 2005 data on the SAT:
- Whites from families with incomes of less than $10,000 had a mean SAT score of 993. This is 129 points higher than the national mean for all blacks.
- Whites from families with incomes below $10,000 had a mean SAT test score that was 61 points higher than blacks whose families had incomes of between $80,000 and $100,000.
- Blacks from families with incomes of more than $100,000 had a mean SAT score that was 85 points below the mean score for whites from all income levels, 139 points below the mean score of whites from families at the same income level, and 10 points below the average score of white students from families whose income was less than $10,000.
- and OF COURSE this reflects IQ and shows regression to the mean as the black kids of wealthy presumably higher IQ blacks reverts back to the more normal IQ closer to 80 IQ (i estimate taking out hybrid vigor here)... but now to show what high income whites can do!...

+Trebol Bajo russia's crime rate has been playing out and dropping, just as the MEXICAN DRUG WAR is petering out... both still horrible, just saying these are historical anomalies in transition... from USSR to "free black markets" largely controlled by an exKGB criminal network in league with organized crime in russia - hardly free markets!  russia is still NOT FREE on the FREEDOM MAPS u can look up... they are still in transition - USSR had MUCH lower crime rates!

narcostate mexico?  represents BY FAR the biggest failure of the drug war globally, like i like to say:  END THE DRUG WAR, SAVE A MEXICAN!  or really 1000s!

u mention a problem with race, there is the most basic 5 race model, but i'd prefer 10+ for greater overlap of morphology within each subspecies...

INDIA is THE crux of the race debate, a large swath of population very hard to put into the three race model, which is really just a terse generalization anyway, even as much as it is HIGHLY predictive...

IRELAND does in fact have the lowest IQ in NW europe, more than a few points below the rest of NW euro...  england DESERVES to look down on them... i do and i'm scottish, irish and english (1/8th dutch mixed in ;)   i lived in the UK for over 3 years... been to england/scotland and ireland, the whole of THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND (soon to be changed i hope tomorrow with the SCOTLAND vote ;) 

u mention two of the PIIGS:

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/piigs.asp

Greece, as i just checked last week or so ago, has right around 27% unemployment!  so in a broad historical context we see the best go down the hill!

italy has a higher IQ than i thought when learning about all this, over 100 IQ... thats in an 88 IQ world (2011)...

extractive political institutions are what keep countries poor, the peoples intelligence is totally separate thing especially when its being purposely repressed by the elites whom have it in their economic interest to keep prosperity to a minimal. time are different now and its top down market economy, so yea point being is intelligence and political institutions are different things

+Salmaan Khan not true, the highest IQ nations have the best income and wealth EVEN among the population... sadly USA has probably the most stark contrast of class among developed nations because we have so many minorities and an expanding female work base - all easier to rip off!  even so USA is alot better off than most of the world...

IQ and income/wealth:  RICHARD LYNN has done the work on this... try not to think it doesn't matter...

ROBERT REICH has done the work on what u mention in a recent video and book, video titled "INEQUALITY FOR ALL"... he foresees a pendulum swing back to another GREAT PROSPERITY (1947-1977)...

the very rich ultimately are hurting themselves even when u have a languishing dying middle class - case made in his recent book:

"Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future" 

- higher IQ people have better political institutions, better rule of law, less corruption, etc... 

- all things are connected - totally separate idea?  makes no sense... 
 

+Trebol Bajo well i see your logical construct of wisdom has the basic permutations in order, sounds good, the one/two punch into evil's face with the old trustable golden ruler fist... good job, if only we had an INDEX to graph this for every town, family, person, country ;) call the GOLDEN TRUST INDEX ;) ... +1 for u 

+Trebol Bajo seemingly common sense stuff like u have written the last few times NEEDS to be read - like they say, common sense isn't common enough...

so its a cycle of self fulfilling cause/effect response, a compounding benefit for mankind... a bidirectional dynamic.. a self feeding perpetual motion of success and getting along, as long as we start on a trust footing, or someday return to it?

your points are WELL established in the recent ROBERT REICH book/movie:  INEQUALITY FOR ALL... 

we have been losing trust in the sense of fairness for our workers and the economy and politics at large... this is predicted to cause riots, some revolt and a swing back to a more shared prosperity like we had during what Reich calls THE GREAT PROSPERITY (1947-1977)

+Trebol Bajo having been a trekkie for so long when i pick out a few tidbits from it all that have resonance i plug them later for others to glean similar wisdom, hopefully... based on your main theme u will like WORF's quote here:

look at this, savage Worf one upped the mind reader ;)

Lieutenant Worf: The Cardassians have no honor. I do not trust them.
Counselor Deanna Troi: They're our allies now, Mr. Worf. We have to trust them.
Lieutenant Worf: Trust is earned, not given away.

- as to your point of the hiding dishonest:  sociopaths, psychopaths - hollow shells of people, or i should say NONpeople... ANTIpeople... i have to wonder the depth of their self awareness - consciously manipulating people with no inner guilt trip is beyond comprehension to me... 
 

+Masta yeah, all those basic observational facts and empirical evidence, what an inconvenient truth as to racial contrasts biologically and evolutionarily driven - unless of course all that genetic isolation overtime created no differences (the pseudo hope of our PC generation... 

two minutes or two hours can't possibly yield u anything like an equal counter evidential claim against Rushton's full scale synthesis of over 60 variables - its just TOO damning to negroes... 

Actually Rushton notes East Asians have the highest average IQ's. Maybe read what he has written or says in the clip before commenting?

Culture is also very important. East Asians in the past most probably is hold back by its Confucian ethics ; therefore its creativity.

+AlexanderSoulzenitzen agreed, VERY fascinating and interesting (two of SPOCK's favorite descriptive words on STAR TREK ;)

smarter = richer, pretty much works that way... 

+AluhutSmasherTV    Amen to that my fellow common sense believer. :V
His science is  reflective of the EXACT same shit Supremacists believe.
The main issue with these tests is that they never take in to account circumstance.
If you were to run the IQ scores on Europeans during the 14- 16th centuries (when the majority of Europe's citizens were poor and just focused on 'getting by') they'd be possibly worse off than Haiti right now. These 'tests' never take into consideration the environment around the subjects.

I for example have an IQ of 120, now what are the chances of a poor kid in Brazil (who has to worry every night if his family has enough food for the next day, and will more than likely fore go school to enter the workforce) getting the same?? This doesn't mean he/she is stupid, it means their focus is placed elsewhere. Then you have other conditions like 'how many people have access to education?' 'What is the government structure of these countries?' etc.

Not to mention someone please tell me why we measure human beings intelligence on such mundane things in the first place?? Yes, being literate on famous Shakespeare plays and understanding Algebra 2 is nice but how do these things help us SURVIVE? If the worlds technology were to cease working right this instant, many people such as Rushton would be shit-out-of-luck because their intelligence on how to survive off the land is so vague (if there at all). 

All in all its a BS excuse for racists to have an argument on why they think non-whites are incapable of running societies (even though history has proven otherwise over and over and over again.)

+TheRockyCrowe
Common sense
Supremacists
Racists

You have only bumper-sticker slogans and buzzwords.  You're stupid, indoctrinated, and you don't have any evidence to support your agitprop.  You're the reason why non-Whites live in squalor.  Even if you have a decent IQ you're still too stupid to make efficient use of the resources you have, which requires evidence.

+ConfrontationalRealist I (a irish/italin person) who doesn't believe in the dumb shit Supremacists asshats like to spew...whose looking at all angles of the situation...who isn't placing bias on other races because they're different than me....

Is some how ...'not making use of my resources'...and ...is 'the reason..'non-whites live in squalor??' Speaking of which, you  appear to have totally skimped over the part where I said: "*Then you have other conditions like 'how many people have access to education?' 'What is the government structure of these countries?' etc."*

Spare me whatever psuedo science bull-harky you've ready to fire...judging by your comment (and yes - complete lack of common sense) apparently everyone with a since of decency is some angry liberaltard.

+TheRockyCrowe fake science?  no its basic observational data... Rushton reviews about 60 variables as to racial differences... the contrasts are stark enough, proving race is no mere superficial color coded convenience of social construction

do u know what a supremacist is?  we race realists (racists) get tired of the usual stupid tags like hater, nazi, kkk, supremacist... even white nationalist... as i'm much more anarcho than that... 

so show us the REAL SCIENCE, since u somehow know that the data collected and synthesized is false:  brain size, IQ, crime rates, disease rates (behavioral and genetic), loan failure rates, income, total wealth, longevity, etc... is a VERY long list... and somehow blacks are equal?  or just a little inferior?  whats your point as to quantifying any of this?  

u just want to cover this all up as a measure of decency?  this "DECENCY" is a lie, a damaging dangerous one!

+raceandcrime I've no interest in dealing with people who're in consistent denial (or fear) of whatever nonsense gives them pride.

I laugh when you say 'observational' because as I've already stated: He's ignored the environments surrounding the subjects. Sociology 101 = you take into account EVERYTHING that could effect your data.

If your government doesn't make education access easily obtainable, if you  are fucking starving, if you are afraid you could be killed or kidnapped everytime you leave home, if you're on the streets and are barely getting by in life - tell me- how likely will one be able to soley focused on education???

'Well to do' Hispanics, East Indians and Africans are surpassing western test standards left in right, but guess what?? They aren't dealing with any of the issues I previously stated. Your racial theory is BS; its not about race, its about environment you twit.

Spare me the grief on your skull sizes, and crime rates - more BS things that've already been proven again-and-again to be faulty and bias.

 I find it quite ironic you people refer to yourselves as 'realists' and then believe the most unrealistic things that usually relate to degrading and belittling non-whites...and then turn-around-and-say 'we're not racist, we're just REALISTS." LMFAO. You can sugarcoat yourself all you want, everyone can see right through you.. You're no  'realist' you're just like all the other dumbfucks who want to stick to their psuedo-sciences in order to not feel so insecure about where the world is headed (aka; breaking racial barriers). So everyone who doesn't buy your sugar-coated shit is somehow 'twisted' or a 'scheming liberal.' Go back and hide in your little bubble, maybe one day you'll pop it.

+TheRockyCrowe

"He's ignored the environments surrounding the subjects." - No, he didn't. You can find detailed disambiguations on the estimated impact of the non-shared environment, which is further disambiguated into active non-shared environment and passive non-shared environment, which is important, because active non-shared environment is one that you create around yourself with your own actions.
You obviously have no knowlegde of what you criticize and you are just an arrogant, close-minded bigot.

+mik1984 "which is important, because active non-shared environment is one that you create around yourself with your own actions."

 No you dounce, it appears you've literally just reinstated what I've already stated. :/

See this part right HERE?? : that you create around yourself with your own actions." 
So what are you trying to say?? That a person living in either severe poverty, famine, or a war torn state of environment is capable of just 'ignoring' all these factors and going to school like a good little boy/girl?
So what you're telling me is, is that if you were a poor man living  in the Philippines, Somalia, Syria or Israel you'd have absolutely no problems WHATSOEVER, risking your life everyday for school? Or using what could've been 'work time' (ya know to put food on the table because you haven't eaten in God knows how long) as school time instead??

It is true there have been 'exceptions' like Brazillian millionaire CEO Maria Das Graicas, or the West African kid (Kelvin Doa I think it was?) who turned scrap metal into energy and got a front row seat to Harvard. Both of them were living in horrid conditions and were still able to succeed/focus on education. But this cannot be said for the majority.

But by all means, go on ahead and side with your 'realist' delusional friends.

+TheRockyCrowe u r quite deluded, delusional, delinquent of the facts?  u know Rushton's work well enough to know what he ignored?  amazing... if u REALLY knew his work u would join us in the great holy crusade of racial awareness ;)  

so just what is your position?  blacks are equal, nearly equal, inferior but not as bad as the evil racist say... or what?  have u quantified any of this debate or do u merely wish to dispute the current data like u have better or that we simply don't have accurate data period?

+raceandcrime
you sir, 'merely wish' to believe in this warped view of 'racial awareness' aka; we're all equal to a certain degree but some races are more inferior to others (and by inferior we mean all the non-white people - excluding Asians -scratch that- excluding only the light skin Asians due to their current economic status, otherwise, they'd be on the shit-list too).

Every human being is capable of having the same amount of intelligence - unless they've some kind of mental disposition. But NOT every human being has the luxury of living in a high status country  with no severe flaws that affect its people. Which is exactly what Rushton carefully evades.
Its really not that fucking hard to see through...If you're going from country to country, testing IQ's and then saying the people there are stupid 'just cuz' without taking into account the ENVIRONMENT your 'data' is already faulty.

Since you're 'so wise' I figured you'd already piece together where my position is. We're all equal. :/
        Now what psuedo science do you've to rebuke that??

+TheRockyCrowe

"Now what psuedo science do you've to rebuke that??" the one that you ignore to read and understand.
Non shared environment is fully accounted for, it is meticulously compared how much people spend time in library, how many books they read, what diet do they eat, the whole laundry list.
Differences in environment are far from ignored and when accounted for, they do nothing but strengthen the hereditarian case.
You obviously have no idea what you talk about.

+mik1984
ONCE AGAIN you meticulously ignore the fact none of THAT is relevant to each individuals situation. He is using 'one size fits all' as if all countries run exactly the same.

So once again, pleeassseee tell me, exactly how you would 'take time out of your day' to go to the library, take time to read books, and eat healthy, and all that good jazz when you ARE FUCKING STARVING?? Severely impoverished, or  afraid to even step out the door because your country is ran by militias or flooded with war violence??

As I've repeated twice on here, all of that is pretty damn hard to do under such conditions when most people are more concerned about just surviving, then they are studying algebraic functions.
IS using your common sense that hard for you??? OR is sympathizing with some of the situations in non-white countries the difficult task here?

+TheRockyCrowe

"ARE FUCKING STARVING??" -
That is why people living in first world countries are the primary subjects of the investigation.
You have no idea what you are ranting about.
Now, go and kill yourself, bigot.

+mik1984 LMFAO...yes 'first world countries' only was it??? Oh pity me..and here I though he was inclusive of African blacks as well?? And then trying to confirm that his small little group of Guinea pigs was enough evidence to support everyone in said inferior-pot is an idiot??

Sir, I applaud your ability to ignore questions in order to rationalize your mental state. Assholes like you will all die out in a few decades time. ...hell..Rushton himself has already passed. :p

+TheRockyCrowe


No, it is you who is dying out. You have nothing but your snark and mud slinging.
Don't be deluded. Nobody in the field of genetics denies IQ heritablitity and that it is not evenly distributed among various distinct population clusters.
Rushton's opinions are supported by every peer reviewed study in the area.

+TheRockyCrowe asians are on average superior to whites, but averages aren't everything, the elite core is white - has been for a VERY LONG TIME... a cursory review of history, tech, medicine, and even political development all show whites are beating the asians as to human progress...

 so the race argument as to whites being superior is by a thin margin, yet that small elite group has made incredible strides... a higher percent of whites are in very high IQ... even with a much higher population asians do not have anything like the white representation as to genius, etc... i have gone over many high IQ lists and even took a hard look at THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, amazing lack of asians relative to their population... so this IQ distinction is true based on standard deviation variation between races and to get to the point, JEWS!

+mik1984 there is a crazy wide range of percentages as to inherited IQ among the experts, who average over half while the range is 20-80% of IQ is genetic as to those most qualified to make this guess, as per a study of this lack of consensus and fuzzy math... 

rocky is a fool, not worth it... i have seen MUCH MUCH better - like that needs to be said  ;)

+mik1984 pfff.. Literally every viable scientist has denied IQ theories..they've consistently been referred to (and documented) as a shitty psuedo-science to place bias, enforce stereotype and instill superiority in some races. They've also included Rushton's 'analysis' in several essays based on how science is sometimes used to justify BS.
 
Only your kind (and by your kind I mean 'Realists' who literally think believing falsities is 'real') will perish...

which btw...have you forgotten your own words?? I recall you telling me to fuck off a minute ago..Whats the matter?? Did I hurt your pride assnugget?? :p

+TheRockyCrowe "Every human being is capable of having the same amount of intelligence" - thats the usual egalitarian lie and hope... but u don't realize that blacks have smaller brains, the smallest - MILLIONS LESS NEURONS... know what that means?  NOT every human being is capable of having the same amount of intelligence...

women have about a 5 point IQ deficit and smaller brains than men... the IQ gap between blacks and asians is no less than 30 points!

if u would like to see the hard data on this u can look it up as to Rushton work and i have several data sets along this line as well... if u could hold the gray matter difference IN YOUR HAND!

+raceandcrime Tsk, tsk....you give me the same BS nearly every other closeted Supremacist will spew....not that I expected anything less from someone whose name is 'raceandcrime.'
Even your knowledge of 'human progress history' very slyly evades how whites learned the majority of anything related to 'progress' from the various countries they traveled too...but no-no..lets give Europeans all the credit as per usual.
And oh no...another nutter whose going to link everything to the 'darn Jews'....

You try to say IQ is hereditary?? Well if by 'inherited' you mean parents who pass on educational values to their children and parents that don't, than  'somewhat' considering the individual choice factor. Otherwise (yet again) all human beings are capable of the same intelligence level if given the resources. There is no 'gene' here, you either learned it or you didn't. If what you're trying to say was true then Europeans would've never progressed; the majority of your greatest musicians, philosophers, leaders and scientists were born into poverty and families with minimal to no education.

One day you'll either wake up from all the fabricated psuedo-science...or you'll drowned and die in it like all the others who take such things with credibility.
Not like I care tho, as I told another POS here, people with your line of thinking will all perish in a few decades. Its the reason you're scared out of your minds right now, and must cling on to practically anything that rationalizes your position though the world is shifting in the opposite direction.
G'day and go fuck yourself. :p

+raceandcrime Awwww....I think I broke it!!
Now its trying to use quadruple the psuedo science, most of which is irrelevant shit dating back to the 1940's and later!
Even though what it just stated has been rebuked and proven false plenty of times...and not by just science..but by every day occurrences. 

Didn't I tell you to go fuck yourself already??? Or are you just really desperate to convince me that your race is superior and I should be kneeling down for your 'wisdom'??

+TheRockyCrowe


I am displeased that people immune to the appeal to reason are still alive. I guess i have to add you to my blocklist.

+raceandcrime

I think that some facts are uncontroversial:
1. IQ heritablitiy is a fact, therefore it is influenced by genes
2. Brain size is also heritable, and brain size is correlated to IQ at least to the degree that muscle size is correlated to strength.
3. These features are not evenly distributed among various population clusters. As heritable traits in any living organism are USUALLY distributed unequally among the population clusters of that organism.
There is no scientific reason to EVEN EXPECT IQ to be evenly distributed among human races, the reasons for such expectations are ideological. Nobody expects the frequency of red hair to be evenly distributed among all races, nor even all identifiable population clusters of the white race.

+mik1984 1 and 2:  the brain size to IQ correlation coefficient is .40 as per ARTHUR JENSEN...  more telling than this blunt bit of math are parents - smarter parents have smarter kids, etc... but REGRESSION TO THE MEAN works in both directions!  below IQ parents will also show regression to average IQ just as very high IQ parents will show regression among their kids, on average... but the regression from very low IQ and very high IQ still puts the kids into a huge gap, below and above average...  and of course the percent that get even lower than low and higher than high... whatever that is, need to see that data...

it is true that equally high IQ black parents have sharper regression lower for their kids than do equally high IQ white/asian couples...  u might understand why, few do - it ultimately requires no genetic explanation, merely a math model variation according to averaging... 

so the .40 is right in the middle of the pearson correlation coefficient narrative scale, a medium correlation... solid evidence!

3.  this is why u have averaging to make the generalization, people that are anti IQ and anti racist want to always argue the ends of the ranges, like some blacks are smarter than some whites etc...

on your last two sentences, too bad we have to state the obvious as to the ideology we are up against and really just lack of understanding of math models of what a distribution is, a bell curve, the XY axes graph and 45 degree line splitting the X and Y axes with distribution points falling on it exactly going up to the right in a 1.00 coefficient world... etc...

 in the insane egalitarian world of the multiculturalist fascists that enforce integration/miscegenation with busing and diversity days they like to imagine overlapping bell curves, or i should say one bell curve for all of humanity, one race

+mik1984 as to blocking rocky, most likely a kid, into alot of cartoon crap... what do u expect from our PC liberal schools beholden to treating blacks as not only equals, but having their own historical segments and specific identification in history class - maybe they can do the same for whites some day... 

+raceandcrime

Most farm animals and crop plants we use today are a result of thousands of years of selective breeding. If you have selective breeding you still have regression to the mean, but the mean does also float, and thus you end with i.e. a situation where the farm corn regresses to a different mean than wild corn regarding the thing were the seeds are.(forgot how it is called)
Analogically, height does regress to a different mean i.e. Pygmy and in Vietnamese than in Europeans. So does the IQ regress to a different mean in different races.

+mik1984 all good quantitative analysis common sense, well stated enough my fellow utuber ;)    BTW, who is your smiling avatar guy with HOPE background color scheme (Shepard Fairey rip off... i was thinking milton freidman for some reason... some other jew?  ;)  

wow, good guess, as i confirmed it by looking it up... not many utubers would have caught that!  i award myself 10 academic financially astute egghead ivory tower intellectual utube points, thank u (me)

double BTW, pygmies are the biggest retards on the planet, 54 IQ in an 88 IQ world... as per RICHARD LYNN data... they are the dumbest group on earth, dumber and dumbest within the dumbest race -- oh god, LOL:  i also reward myself for incorporating the recent release of the second DUMB AND DUMBER movie into my racial IQ comparison point here ;)  the race point of the day worth 10 points again?  well hopefully some +1s ;)

+raceandcrime

This is a parody of the Obama's poster.

+mik1984 i know, i HARDLY needed to hear the explanation, i referenced the originator... maybe u have seen the ANDRE the giant OBEYs... the stickers... Shepard's other anarcho taging work?  if u know what i mean...

i like the dog obeys the best, fun stuff:

https://www.google.com/search?q=obey+dogs&newwindow=1&safe=off&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=FzvBVK2MA8OqNr2bg5gC&ved=0CCoQsAQ&biw=1600&bih=773

just google OBEY DOGS if worried about the above link being some evil anti milton friedman viral attack

+Sel am  So say the people on the bottom.

+Warsteiner Deutschland i think its also this idea that these high minded liberals WHO THINK THEY ARE SUPERIOR AS WELL will attempt to prop up those who they KNOW are inferior to make themselves look even more superior in some moral sensibility, because they can't do it by the numbers, only in this heart felt emotional way... like dismissing IQ, like it doesn't matter, saying color is just that and no more an indicator than anything else, etc... always trying to dumb down the issue like the racists are simplistic

in your point about india being a third world country nowadays, youre saying intelligence = civilization?   i dont necessarily agree, i think you're making assumptions that arent true.  or we have a different understanding of the word "intelligence"   im not going to watch this video however, its interesting to do these statistical studies, but its still such a small sample compared to the number of possible people allowed by our DNA, its like taking a sample of a glass full of water from the ocean and concluding that there are no whales.  LOL for a shitty analogy

+DeuceGenius
 Rationalization is a bitch. We load your ass up with facts and you just flush them down the toilet!

+DeuceGenius of course IQ = most everything... it is THE single best predictive variable for humanity... INDIA IQ = 82, thats pretty bad...

read RICHARD LYNN on the IQ and income connection... and his global IQ charts... 

small sample?  this work is exhaustive, global!  so u want to say the genetic surveys and race comparisons are not enough based on FUTURE DNA combinations?  wow, thats one i haven't heard yet, absurd - should we talk about species change to homo sapien aster?

u need to understand the DNA bottleneck and how it has served whites/asians while the narrowing hasn't happened in africa... 

+raceandcrime  The problem with Indians is that their low mean IQ gives them the illusion of intelligence. Look how many Indians are in the IT sector, yet it's always the Whites and Asians who make the real accomplishments. (On a side note, what makes Asians a threat to Whites is not their slightly higher mean IQ, but their work ethic mixed in with a serious lack of morals (think China). Thank God they aren't creative otherwise we'd be fucked.)

BTW, ever see that Indian kid who they had performing surgeries at age seven? He's about as smart as a bag of rocks.

+Warsteiner Deutschland In USA the india IQ is 109-112!  so we are getting a HUGE upgrade as to IQ in america - good immigration policy on this count!

its a good point, the collective IQ and work ethic of the asian does make them a longer term bigger threat... but it is the distinction in so many ways for whites that has and WILL keep us ahead, minus insane progressive marginalizing the west with immigration openess, miscegenation, etc... 

not the best two or three asian governments that come close to matching rule of law democracy can compete with a few dozen european and other white nations - well kinda white, still white overall!  (we just passed the point recently of their being more minority kids than white kids in USA... 

LOL on the bag of rocks indian surgeon ;)  i did see a India INDIAN doing dentistry on the streets in india with flies and a cost of 50 rupees!  wow!  hardcore poverty street "dentistry"!  i'll stick with my dad!  actually he retired as a dentist almost 10 years ago, but i would trust him 1000 times over this indian in india!  i mean literally on the streets like the beggars, had his sign and tools and they showed him pulling this woman's tooth... lots of pain, kind of funny in a way as well  oh god!  eye opening 3rd world shit!  

india will NEVER be anything like china... 23 IQ point gap tells the tale!

+raceandcrime  Don't blame the wannabe dentist too much though because at least he makes an effort to sanitize his dental tools in the pristine waters of the Ganges. :-)

+raceandcrime
i am interested in genetic differences in intelligence between races.  and IQ test does not help much because of the variables introduced by culture, society, education and wealth. its hard to do well on an IQ test if you can hardly read. that does not mean you are not intelligent. unfortunately these tests do not tell us as much as you might like to think.

+DeuceGenius there are over 150 such tests, and even the disavowal of IQ by Raven with his matrices all show very heavy correlation to IQ... u don't even need a quotient u can merely go by percentage - this is what MENSA does, they hardly care about numerical scores, its a matter of being in the top 2%...

so if u think there is cultural bias in such universally held ideals of being smart in math, reading, memory, logic, spatial relationships and really most any form of thought helping u survive than u must have some profoundly differentiated testing for blacks - or are we equal enough as the human race to test largely the same?  

they have many tests for illiterates... u can score pretty high as an illiterate, but overwhelmingly illiterates are quite stupid!  africa is the best example...

they have basic button pressing tests according to lights and basic instructions - with even the slightest complication as to memory or order blacks drop to the bottom and are even below average at the start as to basic speed... so literacy and education can actually both be tested AWAY FROM to universalize the testing process... many tests do this, RAVEN MATRICES is a good one...

IQ is the single best variable for predictive outcomes for mankind, even genetic diseases!  i mean if u must have one and only variable to determine who u live or breed with IQ IS IT!  find me better...

- the cultural bias angle fails as some excuse... low IQ people have culturally lazy mentality... its self reinforcing... low IQ people are more poverty stricken... all u need to do is usually just reverse the causal idea to put PC liberal bleeding heart excuse making in order and at least see variables as codetermining, a bidirectional cause/effect process, a dynamic...  

so it doesn't have to be a judgmental moral argument, this race thing and comparison... its nature... blacks clearly have the worst end of evolutionary progress, so why lie about it to avoid being tagged a racist?  embrace race and realize races are not equal, not by a long shot...

let them whine and call u a racist, at least u will be honest as they scurry in fearful dishonest retreat - they have to, the data is on my side

+raceandcrime
the data is still incomplete at best. but its an interesting and worthwhile study i think.   i think sexual selection may be a leading factor in the evolutionary growth of the human brain to begin with.  the brain is basically a simulation machine, which allows us to predict the future. we can run many different simulations of reality and predict the outcome without having to try them and learn the hard way. i think every human brain is capable of this.  and what about intelligence in areas like art or music?  or the example of a friend of mine, who seems retarded, can hardly learn new tasks it takes him forever. been trying to teach him how to use his smart phone for years lol. but if you watch jeopardy with this guy, he knows almost every answer to every question. while hes maybe not intelligent, his brain seems to retain useless information that he can access quickly and efficiently.  its very interesting and complicated to understand what our brains are doing and how they do it.

+DeuceGenius the data is exhaustive, but feel free to say we need 65 instead of 60 variables...?  don't be silly, the patterns and contrasts are all too clear... 

trying the angle of NO WE NEED MORE TRANSITIONAL SPECIES TO PROVE EVOLUTION, creation is a fact... its like that, no matter how much evolution increasingly is proven its STILL not enough for the god lovers... same thing with anti racists...  no matter how sharp a contrast we demonstrate the anti racists STILL want to say we are one human race?

u r incorrect as to this EVERY HUMAN BRAIN IDEA... its still this illogical impossible garbage from the commie left that u want to spread?...

women have smaller brains than men, and blacks have MUCH smaller brains than asians... would u like the hard data on this?  would u like to visualize it?  MILLIONS LESS NEURONS = lower IQ, MUCH lower IQ... i have many data sets on this topic...

intelligence is covered in most all things, art and music included... even drip painting by JACKSON POLLOCK are proven to show complex fractal formations using computers... music is HIGHLY quantified, hardly some subjective form of communication.... playing by ear or even reading sheet music is all comparable as a measure of many with plenty of standards and frames of reference, if even by timing alone..

mozart was CLEARLY a musical genius, proven... so there is IQ in many things, video games, divergent thinking...  many various tests that outline percentiles, regardless of a quotient if u don't want to calculate it... 

this idea that intelligence is somehow not measurable is part and parcel of the whole PC propaganda machine, because of course one of the main ways to avoid racial distinction is saying we CAN'T DETERMINE IT!  which of course is a horrible lie and a lazy undisciplined measure of trying to get along - tolerance, diversity worship, all that silly heart felt illogical horror whose consequences marginalize and miscegenate...  

even with extreme examples like your friend, or the most famous one, THE RAIN MAN (Kim Peek, RIP) we have averages, like the rain man, not even a 75 IQ but he was super genius in some ways... but as retarded as an idiot in many other ways, conceptually or even taking a shower!  his dad had to help him take showers!

actually the rain man was so retarded in some areas that he was less functional in society than would the average 74 IQer would be... 

so even with these starkly contrasted folks we can still create an average!  same thing with art and music... high IQ in these specific areas almost always correlates well with other areas and if they don't immediately then these same people CAN improve in math or whatever measures... your friend example and rain man are fringy end of the range examples, hardly telling of my overall point and generalization...

 racism relies of averages and generalizations of course... single sample evidence is meaningless in science anyway... like an experiment on one mouse is MEANINGLESS... 

sampling size needs to be STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT... anecdotal evidence is hardly evidence... 

+raceandcrime
what i mean is, the total amount of possible people allowed by our DNA so vastly exceeds those who are actually living, its like sampling a glass of water out of the ocean and concluding that there are no whales.. LOL

+DeuceGenius sounds right, and as such we need to narrowly confine these combos to avoid 6000++ genetic diseases and disorders for one!  and we need to breed for brain size, blacks have the smallest brains and lowest IQ...

the bottlenecks of DNA out of africa have served whites/asians both VERY well compared to the remaining wider swatch of DNA  material in africa - MORE IS NOT BETTER!

so do those two things and we will evolve DRAMATICALLY... eugenics is needed!  we are moving the way of IDIOCRACY, watch the first few minutes of that movie!  VERY IMPORTANT, yet turned into a comedy...

+raceandcrime
i actually was recently watching a lecture about tracing neanderthal DNA from some of the east asian and european bloodlines.  and i dont think you can group blacks together saying that they have the lowest IQ's.  there are certainly blacks with IQ's far above the majority of the population. so their DNA is capable of producing it.  also, we don't even understand much about our intelligence, which genes are res[ponsible for it, how it works, etc.etc.etc.

+DeuceGenius of course u can group them together, the data exists, therefore u can show distributions, averages, medians... basic mathematical models... don't be absurd...

its a range, to say one black is smarter than one white is meaningless...  and u r dead wrong as to blacks producing JUST as smart people, THEY CAN NOT, THEY DO NOT... MILLIONS LESS NEURONS AND SMALLER BRAINS... check any IQ list - ZERO BLACKS (Phillip E. of Nigeria is a proven fraud, his wiki article shows he couldn't even get his PhD...

so there IS a cut off, as in NO BLACKS BEYOND A CERTAIN IQ... that number of course would be fascinating to find out!  i do know that highest chess ranking for a black is STILL almost 400 points below the best, who are all white... grandmaster status is nothing compared to the very best... its like saying u play pro ball but are in the minors...

so the IQ cut off is embarrassing low for blacks... there really is NO super high black IQ... miscegenation and hybrid vigor can help, i have the data on that... so a very pure african black with a super genius IQ?  THEY DO NOT EXIST

the flow chart exactly cause/effect relationship as to genetics and intelligence output of course is what the anti IQers and anti racists want in full abundance, never mind direct correlations, probability and predictive outcomes repeated overwhelmingly... extrapolation is part of science... yet there ARE many genetic markers...

u mention a BIG ONE, as in bigger brains...

the brain size to IQ correlation is .40, in the middle of the pearson correlation coefficient chart... solid evidence... no one to one ratio is going to exist for brain size as they also account for body size, etc... 

+raceandcrime
meh, you speak of shit you can not prove.

+DeuceGenius no, i'm just a reporter, an errand boy, a collector of racial data... look it all up, or ask me what u think is NOT proven... how could u know i can't prove ANY of it?  geniuses realize that GOOGLE is the great equalizer these days... 

there really is no debating anymore, just search engines, linking, copy/paste... plenty of peer review publications now on line... at least the abstracts... 

- its poop to those who don't want to believe, its poop to those who find it impolite to make negros look bad

+raceandcrime
im not saying that there arent differences in races, im saying we need far more evidence to be sure you are not jumping to premature conclusions. i dont think it's time to close the books and call it done. there is more work to do.

+raceandcrime  ...and its poop to those who think that negros aren't poop.

+Warsteiner Deutschland aha!  the coup de grace of scatological figures of speech

+DeuceGenius sadly u r all too correct... genetics and evolutionary biology for hominids and especially humans is rife with fear from the PC witch hunters looking for racists...  science has been stifled in this field... 

as to your idea of getting closer to conclusions i would LIKE to see my current race/color racism interchangeability reflect a more accurate geneticism - geneticism should replace racism, but of course the same racial patterns would emerge as enough work has been done to show this is what will happen abiding by your idea of greater data requirement... 

genetics SHOULD prove racism beyond any shadow of a doubt, it has overall, but not in completion as cause/effect flowchart analysis of genetics yielding various human outcomes is more a balance of probability now versus what u and i could envision as turn key direct results

They have very high populations.

Do you understand what "Averages" means?

+TheRockyCrowe as to IQ and family:  experts in aggregate average a bit over 50% as to the IQ effect coming from genes... the range in the survey of all these qualified to comment folks is 20-80%... so OBVIOUSLY there is some arbitrary guesswork here!

so u go by the data...  and with that u have a narrower range but including enviro factors is guesswork, so u have probability outcomes...

the numbers game is here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

+TheRockyCrowe "Every human being is capable of having the same amount of intelligence"

Probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard lol. Laughable. It's like saying we're all as talented as Roger Federer in tennis, and provided the "right" environment we could all be number 1.

+g0dlike308
it could even be compared to saying, i think more accurately, that we can all grow as big and strong as shaquille o'neil

+DeuceGenius i'm pretty sure i could develop bat like echolocation if i didn't have this disadvantaged inner city youth upbringing with institutionalized racism and profiling keeping me down ;)  i mean all those bats flying around at night, thats all the chance i ever needed but due to poverty i never had the chance... 

+g0dlike308 it is interesting to see how VERY rare it is for a father to push her two black inner city daughters with rigor into this tennis profession... if enough of that happens!...

some have natural talent, thats obvious... Serena's gorilla profile didn't hurt her game!

Federer and Sampras were both the most natural and easy going players i've ever seen... amazing to look that way and be on top for so long...  others are real fighters, less smooth, less consistent, less natural ability... 

Malcolmn Gladwell, pop writer, put out a book about OUTLIERS and its loaded with this kind of horrible egalitarian nonsense, like we could all be this special BILL GATES or BOBBY FISCHER if we only had that 10,000 hours to develop... crazy!  actually he does do a disclaimer on Fischer, like he WAS unique!  natural talent is what Fischer spoke of about himself saying that all the russians he went up against worked like dogs... 

bottomline:  blacks have the smallest and least complex brains, therefore they CAN NOT AND DO NOT AND WILL NOT DO AS WELL as asians/whites... until they are SO miscegenation ridden that there is a minority of african DNA detritus left over...  as to sports, the answer is obvious... but their success even here is exaggerated...

will have to admit knowing baseball very well that i LONG predicted a black guy would throw the fastest fastball, it finally happened, CHAPMAN! 

+raceandcrime
i admire serena as an athlete. a wonderful human specimen, healthy, beautiful as a living creature.   humans are beautiful and wonderful intellectually as well.  some more than others of course lol. 

+raceandcrime  I always enjoy your thoughtful insight.

+raceandcrime
Listening to that Rocky moron it's as if there is no such thing as talent at all. It's quite obvious there are differences between the races collectively (unfortunately), which is why the outcome is never the same in for example the number of successful engineering company CEO's per capita (not due to "racism" as shitty liberals claim). Blacks as a group, have less intellectual talent than east Asians. I'd also say, Asians, and perhaps whites, as a group, have less talent than blacks at 100m Olympic running. Does that mean the shitty liberals would give whites a 10 meter headstart in olympics and call it "olympic affrimative action" to achieve equal outcome? Course not, white liberals are not interested when things don't benefit non-whites. Fucking traitors.

Talent (a.k.a genetics) + hard work (a.k.a environment) = success. Not just hard work....
that's only half the equation.

+g0dlike308 LOL, i use the 100m example myself, its pretty funny... only one white that i know have has broken 10 seconds... the rest ALL BLACK, dozens of them... in fact by around half a second better as to BOLT... and a full half second is HUGE, a massive gap, like the IQ gap between blacks and japs or jews even more especially...

evolution and nature are racists, the tag team of stifling the negro ;)

the experts on average say more than half the IQ comes from genes, but within this field the range is pretty crazy, 20-80% is genetic... so its fuzzy math for sure!  

the IQ to brain size correlation is .40-.44 as to the pearson coefficient... thats in the middle, a medium correlation... 

u get it and i think even most liberals get it, they are simply bigger liars ABOUT IT!

+Warsteiner Deutschland well i keep repeating... i'm like a boring fly fisherman at times, keep using the same bait... u will find my same plugs all over the place if u look...

i find it fascinating when people are given the data the depth of their denial on this one topic MORE THAN OTHERS BY FAR... the brainwashing is deep and wide, the zeitgeist polluted badly as even the right is left on this race issue... i'm the rebalancer, the messenger, the errand boy here to revise the lies!  well thats a new one, REVISE THE LIES!

another comparable topic as to lies and sticking to them is religion, the amazingly childish depth of myth making - comic book style but sanctified as god's word, WEIRD!

+raceandcrime  I firmly believe that there are MANY people out there who think just like we do but are absolute cowards, willing to sacrifice their lands and blood for a pipe dream. The system has emasculated them of their Aryan warrior spirits, or maybe I should say, they allowed the system to emasculate them out of fear.

+raceandcrime
hey fly fishing isnt boring :)

+AluhutSmasherTV 
Actually, nothing you say refutes his main point.
Even IF it were true that things were much different in earlier years, as you claim about India and Africa and China and Greece, that misses his entire  point, which is that TODAY, there is an almost linear [with few exceptions] relationship between economic progress and development, and IQ.  Also, if these claims ARE true, all the data indicates that their IQ would have been HIGHER then than it is today. India has so many social pathologies that his estimate for their IQ seems to be about 10 points higher than their actual technological state (or lack thereof).
Within the US, this linear relationship is even closer by race and sex when you compare GRE quantitative scores to incomes.
As an example, Asian men in the US [who are mostly East Asians] score 638, which is 2.11 standard deviations higher than Black women who score 404.
Can you imagine how small the overlap is, in both IQ and incomes?

+raceandcrime 

" +DeuceGenius of course u can group them together, the data exists, therefore u can show distributions, averages, medians... basic mathematical models... don't be absurd...

its a range, to say one black is smarter than one white is meaningless...  and u r dead wrong as to blacks producing JUST as smart people, THEY CAN NOT, THEY DO NOT... MILLIONS LESS NEURONS AND SMALLER BRAINS... check any IQ list - ZERO BLACKS (Phillip E. of Nigeria is a proven fraud, his wiki article shows he couldn't even get his PhD...

so there IS a cut off, as in NO BLACKS BEYOND A CERTAIN IQ... that number of course would be fascinating to find out!  i do know that highest chess ranking for a black is STILL almost 400 points below the best, who are all white... grandmaster status is nothing compared to the very best... its like saying u play pro ball but are in the minors...

so the IQ cut off is embarrassing low for blacks... there really is NO super high black IQ... miscegenation and hybrid vigor can help, i have the data on that... so a very pure african black with a super genius IQ?  THEY DO NOT EXIST

the flow chart exactly cause/effect relationship as to genetics and intelligence output of course is what the anti IQers and anti racists want in full abundance, never mind direct correlations, probability and predictive outcomes repeated overwhelmingly... extrapolation is part of science... yet there ARE many genetic markers...

u mention a BIG ONE, as in bigger brains...

the brain size to IQ correlation is .40, in the middle of the pearson correlation coefficient chart... solid evidence... no one to one ratio is going to exist for brain size as they also account for body size, etc... "

We have all the proof we need with GRE scores where not a single one of the 220,000 most educated Blacks on the PLANET (those applying for our once-excellent graduate schools) scored over 600 (35 points LOWER than the average for East Asian men).

+Chr1st1an Israel chess rankings, the best black is no less than 300 points below the best... quite a gap, kind of a bland grandmaster actually... 2400ish in a 2800ish top chess world... 

u might like this data as well, pretty funny... and SHOULD include the fact that blacks have increasing white genetic influx, so this data would be even more pronounced is black americans didn't have heterosis helping them (thats hybrid vigor and a higher IQ due to white influx...

The College Board's 2005 data on the SAT:
- Whites from families with incomes of less than $10,000 had a mean SAT score of 993. This is 129 points higher than the national mean for all blacks.
- Whites from families with incomes below $10,000 had a mean SAT test score that was 61 points higher than blacks whose families had incomes of between $80,000 and $100,000.
- Blacks from families with incomes of more than $100,000 had a mean SAT score that was 85 points below the mean score for whites from all income levels, 139 points below the mean score of whites from families at the same income level, and 10 points below the average score of white students from families whose income was less than $10,000.

- so this shows regression to the mean and debunks the silly class argument - like poverty makes people stupid instead of the idea that stupid people are poverty stricken far more often...  i call this the HUXTABLE BLACK-WHITE TRASH COMPARISON

+raceandcrime 

I don't even believe the assertion that mamzers with a black parent and a White parent have an IQ of 85, the average of 100 for Whites and 70 for blacks, because their actual behavior in American cities which have a population which exceeds 80% blacks, puts them generations behind pure blacks of Africa:

1) their murder rate is 10-100 times higher.

2) their rate of fatherlessness is now at least five times higher-- and even in this country as miscegenation increased fatherlessness increased five fold.

3) under obamanation their household net worth went NEGATIVE, something not even African blacks experienced.

4) most African blacks speak English with an impeccable British accent, something not even Snoop Dogg can emulate.

5) the MOST educated American blacks, the ones with a five times higher than average cost per student, are in Highland Park--which has a one hundred percent ILLITERACY rate, compared to only 60% in Africa.

+Chr1st1an Israel u r GROSSLY wrong... u have NO IDEA how bad africa is!   we bring in MUCH BETTER than the average black from their originating country, like nigeria... we IN NO WAY bring in the average 67 IQ nigerian!

1) u enjoy making up stats?

2) u enjoy making up stats?  illegitimacy rates for blacks in recent years in USA have been around 70%

3)  LOL, a negative net worth can STILL make u wealthier than the average african!  ever heard of food stamps, welfare, low income housing, etc...  african doesn't have a small fraction of our social safety net spending...

4) LOL again!  there is no longer anything like an "impeccable" english accent... middle america is the most universally understood english, "no accent"... older english, queens english, estuary and posh do NOT serve most english speakers around the world as american media has set the standard - simply by majority...

africans are LOADED with HORRIBLE tribal accents... 

5) again, your "stats" are HIGHLY questionable, childish...

http://theafricaneconomist.com/ranking-of-african-countries-by-literacy-rate-zimbabwe-no-1/#.VWXiCFIYFFs

some of these are VERY hard to believe in this link, but it would on average support your seemingly guess work of 60%...  nigeria is the most populace country by far in africa, 68% literacy according to this study... 

+raceandcrime   If people like this don't know already, they never will.

I asked my son in the car the other day to tell me what he honestly believes about Blacks, not what CNN wants him to believe. Programmed to be anti-racist at school, he finally admitted, "Ok, they are 'on the low' side." I then told him to never feel guilty and not to buy into all the anti-White propaganda because he has done nothing wrong.

+raceandcrime​ 

You missed my point. I posted that to support your point. I know how bad Africa is as I spent a year there one month);

"+Chr1st1an Israel u r GROSSLY wrong... u have NO IDEA how bad africa is!   we bring in MUCH BETTER than the average black from their originating country, like nigeria... we IN NO WAY bring in the average 67 IQ nigerian!"

So we don't bring in Kenyans like Obama either with an IQ equivalent to Nigeria?

How did he get here then?

I've been to the remotest parts of Russia, China, Africa, and the Behamas where the British accent is so thick I can't understand a word they say--and they can't understand a word of my American "English"--so in support of your above points I wonder why it is that the language American blacks speak is so poor relative to some VERY poor blacks.

Would you like a cite on how the increasing rate of fatherlessness amongst American blacks paralleled a ten fold increase in crime rates-- especially murder?

+Warsteiner Deutschland awesome!  nice story... i would also give my son this education, if i had one... +1 for your son as well!  good job dad! ;)  LOL... 

i keep telling people about brain scans as to fear of blacks - they put up pictures of a variety of people by age, gender, race, colors, etc... ALL people show the MOST fear for blacks, black men/boys especially... even blacks are smart enough to be the most afraid of blacks!

i have to wonder when this really started to be true... if this could have even been possible before out of africa theory went into effect... i mean we had so much genetic isolation for so long... i remember a story of a guy whose grand dad said it was the first time he saw a black man, in germany during WWII... 

i argue its good evolution for us all to be the most afraid of blacks, i just wonder how much racial interaction it took for our brains to be programmed this way - and when... 

as to your son's word, low... it works just as well... the antis are SO bothered by the superior/inferior dynamic i just have to rephrase it for them and show them its the same thing as higher/lower scores and that superior is a function of being a better person, whether by nature, nurture or willful choice and that the conclusions by race are obvious

i have to say the fascination with this debate for me might very well be the obviousness of it that a child can figure out coupled with the obtuse obfuscatory running around the issue apparently normal and intelligent people of the anti ilk engage in 

+raceandcrime


 
We have Yorkshire Terriers who, if they were able to speak, would tell you that we are their pets, rather than the other way around );

They picked up racism completely on their own, with no prompting from us.

If a little Mexican girl comes over and asks to pet them, and we say "ok", each one of them will just about bite their hand off.

Needless to say, they blacks are aan absolute no-no: they all  begin barking in unison about a mile before WE know a Black is going to walk by.

But any White person, child or huge, male or female, wants to pet them--NO PROBLEM.

Dogs have been around 5,200 years and this was built into their bios from day one. People literally had nothing to do with it.

Seems to me that dogs are smarter and more discriminating than many White American women );

+Chr1st1an Israel yorkies are in the top ten as to doggie IQ, border collies are the jews, top dog...
u can see the dog IQ list - rotties, sheps, labs, goldens, etc... 

i'm not just a racist, i'm a doggist, i'm a genderist, i'm an ISTIST, an istologist, a member of that wonderful group of people on earth that believes we can quantify the universe with analysis proving better/worse, up/down and all around...

LOL, i have heard this of blacks before... dogs DO have special senses... rupert sheldrakes dogs are AMAZING!  as in his work with them, proving faster than light communication in the universe (nonlocal correlation and bell's theorem... takes explaining...

whites may in fact be better survivors and evolved better with dogs earlier than all the other races... i heard a tidbit of an AMAZING theory, that humans would NOT have evolved without dogs!  or domesticated and unnaturally selected wolves... its a fascinating idea that can only feed the dogophile doghead dog worshipers ;)

do whites have a superior relationship with dogs around the world?  YES!  CANCER SNIFFING, DIABETES SNIFFING, CADAVER DOGS, military dogs, pet therapy, etc... ALL WHITE "INVENTIONS" ALONG WITH DOGS... while asians keep eating them ;)  and look where the wild dogs are - africa and dingos in oz as abos couldn't handle the relationship either ;)

+raceandcrime

Interesting points--each one seems to make perfect sense.

I swear we have never been able to understand what sense Yorkies use to know with utter certainty that a Black [as well as a large dog] is coming.  Of course Yorkies think they are nine feet tall, so a Great Dane doesn't bother them at all--but they are alerted long before humans can see, hear, smell, or otherwise sense what's coming.

And of course they are very protective of their owners, so I have no problem believing that many of them saved many human (or at least White) lives.

There is one point I need to make about Asians, having grown up in Asia and having been dealing with them in the semiconductor industry since it began.  It's not true that Asians are not creative, as at least 80% of our top patent holders over the last 30 years have been either Japanese or Korean, As long as 30 years ago, ALL of the semiconductor design engineers in this country have been Asian, mostly Chinese.

It's their excellent math skills which my industry cannot do without.

So why is it that Whites now occupy so many Asian nations while no White country is occupied by Asians.

Verbal skills.

All Asians score lower than Whites in verbal skills than they score higher in math skills, even in their own native languages. While Asian design engineers have been very creative on the design side, the errors they make on the communication side are DISASTROUS in this industry (actually, in everything they do).

Had we not adopted English as the national language, and say adopted German (which we almost did) we could not have displaced the British Empire with the American empire.

+Chr1st1an Israel warning of danger, didn't think of that in the wolf/human dynamic... but the theory is that wolves would come for the scraps humans had left over, and this formed the first bonds, petting, licking, smelling - food = love ;)

and wolves and humans together in the wild 100,000++ years ago was a natural tag team, both hunting as soon as they left camp - both using each other for better advantage and attack... imagine a small group of humans having a whole PACK at their command!  i wonder...

i would have guessed what u say of asians, they OBVIOUSLY have taken white designs and improved on them better than whites in many areas - i know this personally as to jap rice burner bikes vs. the hype patriot american HD... no comparison!  yet stupid tribal american bikers stick to their inferior brands...

asians have a higher percent of high IQ, but not VERY high IQ... there IS a cut off as per the averages and per capita representation... i have studied NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES LISTS, with pictures... IQ lists... its amazing how under-represented asians are... their talents are limited - the best of the best have been whites for a long time and into the future...

asia should be more than just manpower as some of what u say helps prove my points about them ---  as i rely on asians to remain racially pure and not get polluted like whites have been "extincting" themselves breeding with blacks which of course only makes a black...

a pop writer Malcolm Gladwell writes about this asian problem of communication among themselves... he outlined in detail airline safety and the HORRIBLE com probs they have with a cultural root of quiet humility, lack of initiative and stolid chain of command, an obtuse covering up of mistakes, etc... really stupid... 

i was just at a chinese restaurant, one i go to ALL the time... of course they barely speak english, all of them... i asked for more sauce and got HOTTER sauce... won't do that again!  ;)

- i did a racial survey of the GOLDMAN SACHS website, counted pictures in their BS phony diversity sections, which had the obvious expected multi colors and then i checked out the rest of their site after they paid this lip service... their tallest building across the water from MANHATTAN is FILLED with asians... VERY high representation!  math!

+raceandcrime​

All great points. Thanks for making them.

Note that Korea has just made it mandatory that 1st graders learn English.

Step in the right direction, eh?

+Faulster Mann Deutschlands™ 
"If the IQ differences between the different "races" were that high and 
that important, there shouldn't have been a lot of change in the 
economic and cultural performance of the different regions in the world.
But in the course of history, the different regions and peoples have 
performed tremendously different!"

Name a non white or asian first world country, go ahead il wait