xmas3.gif (5334 bytes)

 

Predicting Incomes With Standardized Test Scores

 

By race and sex:

bulletIncomes increase $146 per year for each 1 point increase in GRE Quantitative scores.
bulletIncomes increase $187 per year for each 1 point increase in SAT Math Scores.
bulletIncomes increase $600 per year for each 1 point increase in NAEP Math Scores.
bulletIncomes increase $6,667 per year for each 1 point increase in ACT Composite Scores.
bulletAdditional graphs here

greincome.gif (30354 bytes)

satincome.gif (30275 bytes)

 

naepincome.gif (30275 bytes)

actincome.gif (30275 bytes)

 

Incomes are from http://148.129.129.31/hhes/income/income98/in98sum.html

Additional incomes are from http://ferret.bls.census.gov/macro/032000/perinc/toc.htm

NAEP Scores are from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs/d96/D96T116.html

GRE Quantitative Scores are from ftp://etsis1.ets.org/pub/gre/250365.pdf

ACT scores are from http://www.act.org/news/data/00/00states.html

For more on SAT scores by race and sex see http://fathersmanifesto.net/sat.htm

 

SAT Math

SAT Verbal

Income by race

Income by sex

GRE Quant

NAEP Math 1978

NAEP Science

NAEP Math 1978

ACT Composite

White

Boys

513

454

$42,439

$50,375

586

309

312

309

22.4

Black

Boys

401

358

$25,351

$30,091

446

271

262

271

17.6

Mexican

Boys

448

386

$31,000

$36,797

517

272

267

290

19.2

Puerto Rican

Boys

424

367

$27,000

$32,049

504

268

263

287

18.8

Hispanic

Boys

456

394

$28,330

$33,627

543

279

274

297

20.1

Asian

Boys

545

412

$46,637

$55,358

638

316

316

22.3

Indian

Boys

456

400

$32,000

$37,984

511

270

289

19.6

White

Girls

466

441

$34,503

514

303

306

303

20.8

Black

Girls

354

345

$20,611

404

265

256

265

16

Mexican

Girls

401

373

$25,203

451

268

284

17.6

Puerto Rican

Girls

377

354

$21,951

448

267

281

17.2

Hispanic

Girls

409

381

$23,033

469

273

268

291

18.5

Asian

Girls

498

399

$37,916

572

310

310

20.7

Indian

Girls

409

387

$26,016

459

270

283

18

 

horizontal rule

The following is from http://home.att.net/~dysgenics/TRC.htm

In just this one analysis therefore, the closing gap between Whites and Blacks is shown to be meaningless because of confounding effects, and for that reason the results are without any merit at all. And in a vindication of The Bell Curve that we are seeing more and more of in academic journals and books, Hauser states, "In one important respect, Herrnstein and Murray were surely right: It is most dangerous to project trend lines unthinkingly. Yet another set of NAEP assessments -- for 1992 -- became available after The Bell Curve went to press, and these data appear to confirm that the trend toward convergence in Black and White test scores was reversed after 1986-1988. For example, Figure 1 shows trends in the average (mean) NAEP scores of Blacks and Whites at age 13 in reading, science, and mathematics. The years of greatest convergence are not entirely clear because there are no reading scores for 1986 and no science or math scores for 1988. It does appear that sometime in the middle to late 1980s, the convergent trend ended, and Black-White gaps returned to levels of the early 1980s."

In summary then the following conditions led to a false indication that the intelligence gap between Blacks and Whites was closing when the government changed important programs as follows:

-- Educational expenditures went up much faster for Black students than for all students being tested.

-- Back to basics programs emphasized "teaching to the test" to improve scores so that Black students could do better on the standardized exams.

-- An end to social promotions increased absenteeism and the drop-out rate, so that these marginal or low intelligence Blacks were no longer tested and included in the averages.

-- More students were enrolled into special education programs (slow learners) which was dominated by Blacks and these students also were not included in the NAEP test score results.

Finally, Ceci, Rosenblum and Kumpf state, "THE ESTABLISHED FACTS: There is no dispute among psychometric researchers that Whites outscore Blacks on IQ tests as well as on standardized achievement tests. The gap most commonly reported is approximately 1 SD. (On the most widely used individual IQ tests, this translates into a 15- to 16-point gap between Blacks and Whites; Hispanics fall midway between these groups, and Asian Americans score about 3 points, on average, higher than Whites.) Racial and ethnic gaps in IQ and achievement tests scores have existed throughout this century; for example, IQ differences between Blacks and Whites were evident on the first Stanford -- Binet IQ test normed in 1932. Even earlier signs of a racial gap of approximately 1 SD were apparent on the Army Alpha tests administered to recruits during World War 1. These facts are not in dispute among researchers, although their interpretation is open to argument."