﻿ SAT State Race 2004

Forum

Subscribe

jews/911

dna

RCC

AIDS

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Watchman

Gaelic

TRAITORS

Medicine?

## 2004 SAT Scores by Race and State

• SAT Score for actual Whites is 162 points higher than reported by the College Board.

• What they report as a 202 point gap between blacks and Whites is actually a 424 point gap between White men and black women.

• States which are mostly Whites score 100 to 153 points higher than the "national average" for Whites.

• Whites in Iowa score 236 SAT Math points higher than "whites" in New York.

### "White" Girls in Rhode Island Score 134 SAT Math Points Lower than White Boys in Iowa

"White" Girls in Massachusetts Score 117 Points Lower than White Boys in Iowa in Math

AND 90 Points Lower in Reading, and 46 Points Lower in Writing, for a total of 253 SAT Points Lower

Based on the racial composition of Iowa, the highest scoring state with an SAT score of 1195, New York, one of the lowest scoring states at 1007, and Washington, DC, ground zero in intellectual achievement on EVERY test imaginable at 965, and the SAT scores reported by race, we should see scores of 1052, 1003, and 934 respectively.  This means that Iowa’s actual score was 134 points higher than its racial composition would suggest it should be, New York’s was 4 points higher, and DC’s was 31 points higher.

### Catholic Versus Protestant Calculation

 Iowa Rhode Island % Catholic 11% 45% % Protestant 89% 55% Whites SAT Math 613 533 Whites SAT Verbal 592 512 A = SAT Score Catholics B = SAT score Protestants Math Iowa 0.11 * A + 0.89 * B = 613 RI 0.45 * A + 0.55 * B = 533 A = (613 - .89B)/.11 0.45 * (613 - .89B)/0.11 +.55B = 533 2,507.72 - 3.641B + .55B = 533 3.091B = 1,974.72 B = 638.9 A = (613 - .89 * 638.9)/.11 = 403.4 Verbal Iowa 0.11 * A + 0.89 * B = 592 RI 0.45 * A + 0.55 * B = 512 A = (592 - .89B)/.11 0.45 * (592 - .89B)/0.11 +.55B = 512 2,421.8 - 3.641B + .55B = 512 3.091B = 1,909.8 B = 617.9 A = (592 - .89 * 617.9)/.11 = 382.8 Math Verbal Difference Protestants 639 618 Catholics 403 383 235 471

In other words, if the SAT scores provided by the College Board for SAT scores by each race are correct, we would expect Iowa to score 1048 rather than 1195, we would expect New York to score 1003 rather than 1007, and we would expect DC to score 934 rather than 965.

 Indian Asian black Mexican Puerto Rican Hispanic White jew Mamzer Pre dicted Actual Diff SAT Score 971 1084 857 909 909 926 1059 860 1002 Iowa 0.40% 1.60% 2.5% 3.80% 91% 0% 1% N.Y. 0.50% 6.90% 17.4% 16.30% 57% 0% 1.50% 100% D.C. 0.4% 3.2% 56.5% 0% 0% 8.20% 30.3% 0.% 1.40% 100% Iowa 3.9 17.3 21.4 0.0 0.0 35.2 960.5 0.0 10.0 1048 1195 -147 N.Y. 4.9 74.8 149.1 0.0 0.0 150.9 607.9 0.0 15.0 1003 1007 -4 D.C. 3.9 34.7 484.2 0.0 0.0 75.9 320.9 0.0 14.0 934 965 -31

If all else is equal except the score of Whites, then the SAT score for Whites in Iowa must be 1221 [162 points higher than the national average for Whites], the SAT score for Whites in N.Y. must be 1067 [8 points higher], and the SAT scores for Whites in DC must be 1163 [104 points higher than the national average].

And the SAT score for actual Whites in the nation must be 1221 rather than the 1059 reported by the College Board, which means they misrepresent White intellectual talent by 162 points, and that the gap between Whites and blacks is 364 points rather than 202 points.

How can it be, though, that the White Race in Iowa scores 154 points higher than the White Race in New York, 58 points higher than the White Race in DC, and 162 points higher than the score for Whites reported by the College Board?  How can this be rationalized or explained?

Because Whites are a majority in Iowa, their scores must be higher than Iowa’s average of 1195.  Because blacks are now only 56% of the population of DC and Whites are 38.4%, it's not completely unexpected that the average score for DC of 965 is 108 points higher than the average score for blacks of 857.  It's revealing, though, that blacks in the “state” which spends more per capita for “education” than any other part of the globe [five times as much per student as Iowa], and have the absolutely highest per capita incomes for blacks anywhere in the world, and have more police protection and more different forms of police and have the world's toughest gun control and drug war laws than most dictators, would score LOWER than Mozambique.  But this is what international tests like IAEP have shown.

Because jews demanded in the 1960’s that they not be counted as a separate race, we don’t know the exact population of jews in either DC or New York. Because Whites are only 91% and Asians are only 1.6% of Iowa’s population, if Whites there score 1221, then Iowa’s calculated score is exactly 1195.  But in order to explain the very low score of DC where blacks are only 56.5% of the population, we must assume that at least 4.5% of the population there are jews who score closer to their brethren in Israel than to any local populations.

Viola.  That fits the equation perfectly, giving DC a calculated score of exactly 965, exactly as reported by the SAT.

If that's not the case [if there are no jews who participate in SAT in DC], then the only way to explain why DC's actual score is 18 points lower than predicted is that the score of blacks in DC is only 826, which is 31 points lower than the national average for blacks.  IAEP suggests that's possible.

But what about this whopping 154 point difference between Whites in Iowa and “whites” [note lower case ‘w’] in New York?

jews.

Jews themselves claim there are 6 million jews in the US and that 4.6 million are in New York.  If so, this might mean that 24% of New Yorkers who are listed as Whites are actually jews who score in the range of their brethren in Israel rather than in the range of our brethren in Germany or Ireland.

In order for the calculated score for New York to match its actual score, the percentage of jews there must be 24.5%, producing a score of exactly 1007, exactly what the actual SAT score is.

So by claiming that the SAT score for Whites is only 1059, the College Board misrepresents our intellectual advantage by 162 points, and they make it appear that the gap between Whites and blacks is 202 points rather than 364 points.  And it's not just Iowa which is misrepresented.  South Dakota scores 1191, which is 132 points higher than the national average for Whites, Wisconsin scores 1183, 124 points higher, North Dakota scores 124 points higher, Illinois scores 123 points higher, Minnesota scores 121 points higher, Missouri scores 113 points higher, etc.

Furthermore, this also ignores that ever since SAT began, within each race, there's been a consistent 58-60 point gap between the sexes.  Actually, the gap is 60 points for Whites, blacks, Mexicans, Hispanics, Asians, and Indians, and only 58 points for Puerto Ricans [a difference which is actually within the standard error].

So where public perception is that there's only a 202 point gap between Whites and blacks, the REAL gap between White men and black women is 364 points + 60 points, or 424 points, virtually the opposite ends of the spectrum.

Iowa's population included about 97,000 foreign-born (3.3%).[7] Iowans are mostly of Western European descent. The five largest ancestry groups in Iowa are: German (35.7%), Irish (13.5%), English (9.5%), American (6.6%) and Norwegian (5.7%). The racial make up of the state is 91.0% white (non-Hispanic), 3.8% Hispanic, 2.5% black, 1.6% Asian, and 0.4% American Indian. 1% of respondents report two or more races.[7]

SAT scores by race in Iowa or see directly at:

 Further information Want more? Browse data sets for New York

 People QuickFacts New York USA Population, 2006 estimate 19,306,183 299,398,484 Population, percent change, April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2006 1.7% 6.4% Population, 2000 18,976,457 281,421,906 Persons under 5 years old, percent, 2006 6.3% 6.8% Persons under 18 years old, percent, 2006 23.4% 24.6% Persons 65 years old and over, percent, 2006 13.1% 12.4% Female persons, percent, 2006 51.5% 50.7% White persons, percent, 2006 (a) 73.7% 80.1% Black persons, percent, 2006 (a) 17.4% 12.8% American Indian and Alaska Native persons, percent, 2006 (a) 0.5% 1.0% Asian persons, percent, 2006 (a) 6.9% 4.4% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2006 (a) 0.1% 0.2% Persons reporting two or more races, percent, 2006 1.5% 1.6% Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin, percent, 2006 (b) 16.3% 14.8%

Racial and ancestral makeup

The major ancestry groups in New York state are African American (15.8%), Italian (14.4%), Irish (12.9%), and German (11.1%).[21] According to a 2004 estimate, 20.4% of the population is foreign-born.

SAT scores by race in New York. or see directly at:

 District of Columbia USA Population, 2006 estimate 581,530 299,398,484 Population, percent change, April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2006 1.7% 6.4% Population, 2000 572,059 281,421,906 Persons under 5 years old, percent, 2006 6.0% 6.8% Persons under 18 years old, percent, 2006 19.8% 24.6% Persons 65 years old and over, percent, 2006 12.3% 12.4% Female persons, percent, 2006 53.1% 50.7% White persons, percent, 2006 (a) 38.4% 80.1% Black persons, percent, 2006 (a) 56.5% 12.8% American Indian and Alaska Native persons, percent, 2006 (a) 0.4% 1.0% Asian persons, percent, 2006 (a) 3.2% 4.4% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2006 (a) 0.1% 0.2% Persons reporting two or more races, percent, 2006 1.4% 1.6% Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin, percent, 2006 (b) 8.2% 14.8% White persons not Hispanic, percent, 2006 31.7% 66.4% Living in same house in 1995 and 2000, pct 5 yrs old & over 49.9% 54.1% Foreign born persons, percent, 2000 12.9% 11.1%

Modified Monday, November 23, 2015

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party