Free news

FREE blog







Gun poll








14th Amdt

19th Amdt














Note from Bob. Please save the information in this email on your computer, in your word processor.


Please forward this email to everyone you know. Please read this information carefully.


Your choice is to remain stupid and be slaughtered or to have your eyes opened so that you may fight back. The articles in this email will open your eyes.



National Prayer Network



By Rev. Ted Pike

On October 16, 2004 President Bush signed into law the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act. It establishes a special department within the U.S. State Department to monitor global anti-Semitism, reporting annually to Congress.

This is more “Hate Crimes” legislation, orchestrated by the international Jewish religious, educational, and fraternal organization, B’nai B’rith, and its Anti-Defamation League. The new “Department of Global Anti-Semitism” is designed to make critics of Israel not only into “anti-Semites” but ultimately into “domestic terrorists.”

But first, what is anti-Semitism? Simple: It is the racist belief that Jews, because of heredity, are evil, greedy, corrupting, subversive, degenerate, etc. Hitler believed this. So do the KKK and certain “Christian identity” and white supremacist groups.

Such dehumanization of Jews is evil, un-Christian, un-American.

On the other hand, if the actions of individual Jews, Jewish institutions, Jewish religious or secular leaders, or the nation Israel have been evil, then vehement criticism is not anti-Semitic. It is courageous and laudable. Certainly, the Biblical prophets, including Christ, engaged in vitriolic criticism of the sinful nation Israel and its false leaders. No one considers them anti-Semitic.


However, in its “Report on Global Anti-Semitism” and “Global Anti-Semitism Report,” the U.S. State Department ignores the above perspectives. Here is a list of beliefs or activities the U.S. government now considers anti-Semitic:

  1. Any assertion “that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world” is anti-Semitic.

  2. “Strong anti-Israel sentiment” is anti-Semitic.

  3. “Virulent criticism” of Israel’s leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic. According to the State Department, anti-Semitism occurs when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behavior of a past or present Zionist leader. Thus, a cartoon that includes a swastika to criticize Ariel Sharon’s brutal 2002 invasion of the West Bank, raining “hell-fire” missiles on hapless Palestinian men, women and children, is anti-Semitic. Similarly, when the word “Zionazi” is used to describe Sharon’s saturation bombing in Lebanon in 1982 (killing 17,500 innocent refugees), it is also “anti-Semitic.”

  4. Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.

  5. Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-Semitic.

  6. Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the “New World Order”) is anti-Semitic.

  7. Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.

  8. Diminishing the “six million” figure of Holocaust victims is anti-Semitic.

  9. Calling Israel a “racist” state is anti-Semitic.

  10. Asserting that there exists a “Zionist Conspiracy” is anti-Semitic.

  11. Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia is anti-Semitic.

  12. Making “derogatory statements about Jewish persons” is anti-Semitic.

  13. Denying spiritually disobedient Jews the biblical right to re-occupy Palestine is anti-Semitic.

  14. Alleging that Mossad was behind the 9/11 attack is anti-Semitic.


In the Global Anti-Semitism Report, State Department spokespersons Ambassador Edward O’Donnell and the head of the office of global anti-Semitism, Ambassador Michael B. Kozak, defend the State Department’s definitions. O’Donnell’s statement that he wants to “end all anti-Semitism and other hate crimes” reveals that he considers anti-Semitism a hate crime. Presumably, he would like such a “crime” to be punished.

These State Department reports repeatedly equate “strong, anti-Israel sentiment” and criticism of matters Jewish with “hate.” They give no recognition to the possibility that such criticism might be sincerely motivated not by hate but by moral indignation or even love for the Jewish people.

The Report on Global Anti-Semitism repeatedly calls for passage, both nationally and internationally, of “hate crime” legislation. These laws, the brainchild of B’nai B’rith/ADL, also have as their ultimate goal making it a “hate crime” to criticize Jews, matters Jewish, or the state of Israel.

The Report on Global Anti-Semitism reeks with B’nai B’rith/ADL logic, phraseology, and evidence of their incredible worldwide organizational and statistic-gathering capacities. It contains thirty-three pages of minute documentation of “anti-Semitic incidents” in fifty-eight countries of the world, documentation which only B’nai B’rith/ADL, with its offices in more than fifty countries, could compile or even be that vitally interested in. Without a doubt, as with hate laws, this Global Anti-Semitism Review Act is their creation.


Thus, the Department of Anti-Semitism, applauded and advised by B’nai B’rith/ADL, is working to create a worldwide “criticism-free zone” for Jews in the “New World Order” that is coming. This report ignores whether criticisms of matters Jewish are true. What must be defended are the sensitivities of the Jewish people! Consequently, relating such unflattering realities as the anti-Christian, anti-Gentile contents of the Talmud and Kabbalah, Jewish origins of bolshevism, Jewish dominance of Hollywood and the media, Jewish control of Congress through AIPAC, Zionist atrocities and abrasiveness in the Middle East is anti-Semitic. It is “hate.” It does not matter that such facts can be easily and extensively documented, often from impeccable Jewish sources such as the Encyclopedia Judaica.

All such anti-Semitism, this report says, is a “scourge,” an “intolerable burden,” which “for an increasingly interdependent world…must be ended.”

On the other hand, according to the U.S. State Department, there does exist some possibility that “objective criticism” of Israel and its leaders can be tolerated - that is, just as long as such criticism does not “cross the line” and become “strong anti-Israel sentiment” and “virulent.” Such criticism should not “demonize” Jews, Jewish religious or political leaders, or the state of Israel.

However, what may be considered “virulence” or “demonization” by Zionists may be seen as nothing more than salty truth-telling by critics of Israel. Hypocritically, the State Department itself is not above “demonizing” strong critics of Israel in the most “virulent” terms as a “plague” and “scourge” on mankind!


The State Department’s twisted definition of anti-Semitism provides exponential opportunities to persecute Bible-believing Christians, anti-war activists, Moslems, as well as publishers and broadcasters in the years ahead. In fact, by turning “strong” criticism of the American/Zionist coalition into “anti-Semitism and other hate crimes,” the State Department opens the door to eventual characterization of those who criticize Israel as not only anti-Semites but also as “domestic terrorists.”

Here’s how it can be done:

Today, those who raise funds in America to support America’s and Israel’s terrorist enemies are arrested as “domestic terrorists.” But what if articulate Americans provided something else, potentially even more valuable to Israel’s enemies: “strong criticism” of Israel? Such could weaken Israel morally in the sight of the world, giving justification to the claims of her terrorist enemies. Should they also be punished?

As the Second World War was beginning in 1939, Charles Lindberg was publicly critical of international Jews for inveigling America into a war to destroy Hitler. Lindberg believed that Hitler should be allowed to do what he wanted to do most, move east and destroy “Jewish Communism” in Russia.

In 1944, 30 Americans, who agreed with Lindberg, were arrested for the crime of “sedition,” weakening America’s resolve in the fight against fascism. Later investigation under the Freedom of Information Act revealed that the ADL, attempting to equate criticism of international Jews with Nazism, had entirely created the FBI case.

Records revealed that the ADL was “only warming up” by pursuing sedition convictions against 30 innocent Americans. Their ultimate ambition was to imprison prominent critics of evil Jewish leadership, especially Charles Lindberg. Fortunately, ADL’s attempt to transform 30 critics of international Jews into “Nazis” failed when the judge died and the case was dissolved.

Today, America and Israel are allies in the “war on terror.” Tomorrow, especially if the war on terror intensifies and America and Israel cooperate even more closely, criticism of America’s ally in the war on terrorism may be construed as “aiding and abetting the enemy.” Such “strong criticism” or anti-Semitism may be seen as not only weakening Israel, but America itself.

Turning millions of Americans into anti-Semites for criticizing Israel is thus a transition toward ADL’s ultimate goal: making such persons “enemies of the war on terror,” i.e., “domestic terrorists.”

They then can be prosecuted under Homeland Security laws.


In Canada, we are seeing exactly this happen. Ernst Zundel is a Holocaust revisionist who doubts that a full six million Jews were deliberately murdered by the Nazis, largely by gassing. He asserts that untold numbers of Jews in German internment camps, especially in the last years of the war, died not in gas chambers, but as a result of massive, well-documented typhus epidemics, which also killed countless Poles, Gypsies, Russians, etc. Yet in Canada, thanks to ADL/B’nai B’rith, it is a “hate crime” to lesson to any degree the six million figure of Holocaust dead, or that most of them died in gas chambers. Such diminishment is anti-Semitism, a “hate crime” punishable by harsh fines and imprisonment. Several years ago Zundel was deported from his home in Tennessee back to Canada to spend more than two years in solitary confinement in a Canadian prison. He was then deported back to his native Germany where he remains in prison.

Under what charge have Canadian authorities been holding him?

You guessed it. He is a “terrorist threat!”

So it will be for millions of Americans tomorrow if ADL/B’nai B’rith have their way and the Department of Anti-Semitism’s twisted definitions of anti-Semitism are allowed to stand.

The Department of Global Anti-Semitism is informing the world who the “domestic terrorists” of tomorrow will be.

They are you and I.

horizontal rule


We can do plenty!

Call our members of Congress toll-free at 1-877-762-8762

Call the U.S. State Department comment line at 1-202-647-4000

Demand that all funding and authority for the development of the Department of Anti-Semitism be rescinded.

Demand that Congressional hearings be held to re-formulate a workable, balanced definition of “anti-Semitism” - one that protects Bible-believing Christians, critics of Israel, and Moslems from persecution as “anti-Semites.”

Also, call into talk shows, especially large, syndicated ones.

Since the threat of hate laws is “taboo” on most large shows, do not tell the talk show operator that you want to comment on that subject. If the topic of the day is even remotely related to the issue of free speech, terrorism, the Mid-East, etc., begin with those topics but quickly move the discussion to the threat of hate laws. Describe how free speech is lost in Canada; how eleven Christians were arrested under Pennsylvania’s hate law; how the “Department of Anti-semitism” would make many Americans into anti-semites.

Talk show hosts: For an interview with Rev. Ted Pike on the “Department of Anti-Semitism,” call 503-631-3808.

For many articles on “hate crimes” legislation and B’nai B’rith’s role in creating it, visit

For a gripping 80-minute video documentary by Ted Pike, “Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians,” at $24.90 postpaid, call 503-631-3808, order online, or write

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015











[email protected]IL.COM,  

Communism was originally named "Jewish Bolshevism" because it was Jewish money, Jewish brains and angry Internationalist Jews who supported the Communist or Bolshevik Revolution that imposed communism upon the Russian people. 

When the Communists took over Russia in 1917, they immediately began arresting and imprisoning "their enemies." Who did they arrest and kill? Mostly Christians and supporters of the Christian King of Russia, Czar Nicholas. 

When Jewish communism really got power they were killing Christians by the Millions. Over 100 million people were killed by communist governments world wide. 

On my tombstone it will read: "Jews are the Cancer of America." But the truth is that these atheist internationalist Zionist Jews are the Cancer of the Planet and I have dedicated many hours of my life to trying to awaken Christians to the evil these monsters have done in America and the world. 


First are some quotes that prove that so called HATE CRIME laws are not new. The Jews always put Hate Crimes laws in place when they gain power. In Russia the Jews made "anti-Semitism" a DEATH PENALTY OFFENSE. That’s right, if you as a Russian Christian Patriot spoke out against the Jewish take over of Russia by the Jewish Marxist communists then you were labeled an enemy of the state, a criminal who would be arrested and put in Siberian prison camps where you would die. WAKE UP. We must FIGHT THE POWER, FIGHT THE JEWS and Fight the Jewish takeover of America before they put HATE CRIMES LAWS in place that allow them to arrest Patriots and Christians and put us to death in American prison camps.  

Second is an article by WINSTON CHURCHILL, who was the Prime Minister (President) of England, about the Jewish communist takeover of Russia. THIS IS A MUST READ ARTICLE.  

Third is an article by Nationally syndicated columnist and Author, Joseph Sobran titled: "The Jewish Establishment". THIS IS A MUST READ ARTICLE. More articles follow this one too.  




JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316)

Anti-Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the jungle. Hence, Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable and bitter enemies of anti-Semitism. In the U.S.S.R., anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active anti-Semites are punished with death.”

HILAIRE BELLOC, renown historian in G. K.’s WEEKLY, February 4, 1937 

The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our deplorable press.”


" The Jews in England now demand laws to protect them from anti-Semitism. We know these tactics from our own past when we were struggling for power...We were always able to find loopholes in the law. Besides, anti-Semitism cannot be eradicated by law once it has taken root with the people. A law against hating Jews is usually the beginning of the end for the Jews."  --- Goebbels Diaries, Lochner, p. 336 (1948). 









A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People

by the Rt. Hon. Winston Churchill

Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920



SOME PEOPLE LIKE Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.


Disraeli, the Jew Prime Minister of England, and Leader of the Conservative Party, who was always true to his race and proud of his origin, said on a well-known occasion: "The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews." Certainly when we look at the miserable state of Russia, where of all the countries in the world the Jews were the most cruelly treated, and contrast it with the fortunes of our own country, which seems to have been so providentially preserved amid the awful perils of these times, we must admit that nothing that has since happened in the history of the world has falsified the truth of Disraeli's confident assertion. 


The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such intensity as in the Jewish race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified. We owe to the Jews in the Christian revelation a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all other wisdom and learning put together. On that system and by that faith there has been built on the wreck of the Roman Empire the whole of our existing civilisation.


And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present moment be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. 


It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical. 


There can be no greater mistake than to attribute to each individual a recognisable share in the qualities which make up the national character.  There are all sorts of men--good, bad and, for the most part, indifferent--in every country, and in every race. Nothing is more wrong than to deny to an individual, on account of race or origin, his right to be judged on his personal merits and conduct. In a people of peculiar genius like the Jews, contrasts are more vivid, the extremes are more widely separated, the resulting consequences are more decisive.


At the present fateful period there are three main lines of political conception among the Jews, two of which are helpful and hopeful in a very high degree to humanity, and the third absolutely destructive.


First there are the Jews who, dwelling in every country throughout the world, identify themselves with that country, enter into its national life, and, while adhering faithfully to their own religion, regard themselves as citizens in the fullest sense of the State which has received them. Such a Jew living in England would say, "I am an Englishman practising the Jewish faith." This is a worthy conception, and useful in the highest degree. We in Great Britain well know that during the great struggle the influence of what may be called the "National Jews" in many lands was cast preponderatingly on the side of the Allies; and in our own Army Jewish soldiers have played a most distinguished part, some rising to the command of armies, others winning the Victoria Cross for valour.


The National Russian Jews, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honourable and useful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia's economic resources, and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organisations, the Russian Co-operative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progessive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain. 


In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all of them, have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. 


This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstituition of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. 


There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus, Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krasin or Radek--all Jews. 


In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. 


The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers is astonishing. 


Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin's authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jewish population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews. The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, in relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupified, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms.


The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated. This is an injustice on millions of helpless people, most of whom are themselves suffering from the revolutionary regime. It becomes, therefore, specially important to foster and develop any strongly-marked Jewish movement which leads directly away from these fatal associations. And it is here that Zionism has such a deep significance for the whole world at the present time. 


Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism, it presents to the Jew a national idea of a commanding character. It has fallen to the British Government, as the result of the conquest of Palestine, to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jewish race all over the world a home and a centre of national life. The statesmanship  and historic sense of Mr. Balfour were prompt to seize this opportunity. Declarations have been made which have irrevocably decided the policy of Great Britain. The fiery energies of Dr. Weissman, the leader, for practical purposes, of the Zionist project, backed by many of the most prominent British Jews, and supported by the full authority of Lord Allenby, are all directed to achieving the success of this inspiring movement.


Of course, Palestine is far too small to accomodate more than a fraction of the Jewish race, nor do the majority of national Jews wish to go there. But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire.


Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people. 


It is particularly important in these circumstances that are the national Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion, as many of them in England have already done, and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy. In this way they will be able to vindicate the honour of the Jewish name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik movement is not a Jewish movement, but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of the Jewish race.


But a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough. Positive and practicable alternatives are needed in the moral as well as in the social sphere; and in building up with the utmost possible rapidity a Jewish national centre in Palestine which may become not only a refuge to the oppressed from the unhappy lands of Central Europe, but which will also be a symbol of Jewish unity and the temple of Jewish glory, a task is presented on which many blessings rest.  







The Jewish Establishment

by Joseph Sobran




Joe Sobran article found May 1997 on the WWW at


IN THE EARLY 1930s, Walter Duranty of the New York Times was in Moscow, covering Joe Stalin the way Joe Stalin wanted to be covered. To maintain favor and access, he expressly denied that there was famine in the Ukraine even while millions of Ukrainian Christians were being starved into submission. For his work Duranty won the Pulitzer Prize for journalism. To this day, the Times remains the most magisterial and respectable of American newspapers.


Now imagine that a major newspaper had had a correspondent in Berlin during roughly the same period who hobnobbed with Hitler, portrayed him in a flattering light, and denied that Jews were being mistreated - thereby not only concealing, but materially assisting the regime's persecution. Would that paper's respectability have been unimpaired several decades later?


There you have an epitome of what is lamely called "media bias." The Western supporters of Stalin haven't just been excused; they have received the halo of victim hood for the campaign, in what liberals call the "McCarthy era," to get them out of the government, the education system, and respectable society itself.


Not only persecution of Jews but any critical mention of Jewish power in the media and politics is roundly condemned as "anti-semitism." But there isn't even a term of opprobrium for participation in the mass murder of Christians. Liberals still don't censure the Communist attempt to extirpate Christianity from Soviet Russia and its empire, and for good reason - liberals themselves, particularly Jewish liberals, are still trying to uproot Christianity from America.


It's permissible to discuss the power of every other group, from the Black Muslims to the Christian Right, but the much greater power of the Jewish Establishment is off-limits. That, in fact, is the chief measure of its power: its ability to impose its own taboos while tearing down the taboos of others - you might almost say its prerogative of offending. You can read articles in Jewish-controlled publications from the Times to Commentary blaming Christianity for the Holocaust or accusing Pope Pius XII of indifference to it, but don't look for articles in any major publication that wants to stay in business examining the Jewish role in Communism and liberalism, however temperately.


Power openly acquired, openly exercised, and openly discussed is one thing. You may think organized labor or the Social Security lobby abuses its power, but you don't jeopardize your career by saying so. But a kind of power that forbids its own public mention, like the Holy Name in the Old Testament, is another matter entirely.


There is an important anomaly here. The word "Jewish," in this context, doesn't include Orthodox or otherwise religious Jews. The Jews who still maintain the Hebraic tradition of millennia are marginal, if they are included at all, in the Jewish establishment that wields journalistic, political, and cultural power. Morally and culturally, the Orthodox might be classed as virtual Christians, much like the descendants of Christians who still uphold the basic morality, if not the faith, of their ancestors. Many of these Jews are friendly to Christians and eager to make common cause against the moral decadence they see promoted by their apostate cousins. Above all, the Orthodox understand, better than almost anyone else in America today, the virtues - the necessity - of tribalism, patriarchal authority, the moral bonds of kinship.


The Jewish establishment, it hardly needs saying, is predominantly secularist and systematically anti-Christian. In fact, it is unified far more by its hostility to Christianity than by its support of Israel, on which it is somewhat divided. The more left-wing Jews are faintly critical of Israel, though never questioning its "right to exist" - that is, its right to exist on terms forbidden to any Christian country; that is, its right to deny rights to non-Jews. A state that treated Jews as Israel treats gentiles would be condemned outright as Nazi-like. But Israel is called "democratic," even "pluralistic."


Explicitly "Jewish" organizations like the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League enforce a dual standard. What is permitted to Israel is forbidden to America. This is not just thoughtless inconsistency. These organizations consciously support one set of principles here - equal rights for all, ethnic neutrality, separation of church and state - and their precise opposites in Israel, where Jewish ancestry and religion enjoy privilege. They "pass" as Jeffersonians when it serves their purpose, espousing rules that win the assent of most Americans. At the same time, they are bent on sacrificing the national interest of the United States to the interests of Israel, under the pretense that both countries' interests are identical. (There is, of course, no countervailing American lobby in Israel.)


The single most powerful Jewish lobbying group is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which, as its former director Thomas Dine openly boasted, controls Congress. At a time when even Medicare may face budget cuts, aid to Israel remains untouchable. If the Israelis were to begin "ethnic cleansing" against Arabs in Israel and the occupied lands, it is inconceivable that any American political figure would demand the kind of military strike now being urged against the Serbs in ex-Yugoslavia.


Jewish-owned publications like The Wall Street Journal, The New Republic, The Atlantic Monthly, U.S. News & World Report, the New York Post, and New York's Daily News emit relentless pro-Israel propaganda; so do such pundits as William Safire, A.M. Rosenthal, Charles Krauthammer, Jeane Kirkpatrick, and George Will, to name a few. That Israel's journalistic partisans include so many gentiles - lapsed goyim, you might say - is one more sign of the Jewish establishment's power. So is the fact that this fact isn't mentioned in public (though it is hardly unnoticed in private.)


So is the fear of being called "anti-Semitic." Nobody worries about being called "anti-Italian" or "anti-French" or "anti-Christian"; these aren't words that launch avalanches of vituperation and make people afraid to do business with you.


It's pointless to ask what "anti-Semitic" means. It means trouble. It's an attack signal. The practical function of the word is not to define or distinguish things, but to conflate them indiscriminately - to equate the soberest criticism of Israel or Jewish power with the murderous hatred of Jews. And it works. Oh, how it works.


When Joe McCarthy accused people of being Communists, the charge was relatively precise. You knew what he meant. The accusation could be falsified. In fact the burden of proof was on the accuser: when McCarthy couldn't make his loose charges stick, he was ruined. (Of course, McCarthy was hated less for his "loose" charges than for his accurate ones. His real offense was stigmatizing the Left.)


The opposite applies to charges of "anti-Semitism." The word has no precise definition. An "anti-Semite" may or may not hate Jews. But he is certainly hated by Jews. There is no penalty for making the charge loosely; the accused has no way of falsifying the charge, since it isn't defined.


A famous example. When Abe Rosenthal accused Pat Buchanan of "anti-Semitism," everyone on both sides understood the ground rules. There was a chance that Buchanan would be ruined, even if the charge was baseless. And there was no chance that Rosenthal would be ruined - even if the charge was baseless. Such are the rules. I violate them, in a way, even by spelling them out.


"Anti-Semitism" is therefore less a charge than a curse, an imprecation that must be uttered formulaically. Being a "bogus predicate," to use Gilbert Ryle's phrase, it has no real content, no functional equivalent in plain nouns and verbs. Its power comes from the knowledge of its potential targets, the gentiles, that powerful people are willing to back it up with material penalties.


In other words, journalists are as afraid of Jewish power as politicians are. This means that public discussion is cramped and warped by unspoken fear - a fear journalists won't acknowledge, because it embarrasses their pretense of being fearless critics of power. When there are incentives to accuse but no penalties for slander, the result is predictable.


What is true of "anti-Semitism" is also true to a lesser degree of other bogus predicates like "racism," "sexism," and "homophobia." Other minorities have seen and adopted the successful model of the Jewish establishment. And so our public tongue has become not only Jewish-oriented but more generally minority-oriented in its inhibitions.


The illusion that we enjoy free speech has been fostered by the breaking of Christian taboos, which has become not only safe but profitable. To violate minority taboos is "offensive" and "insensitive"; to violate Christian taboos - many of them shared by religious Jews - is to be "daring" and "irreverent." ("Irreverence," of course, has become good.)


Jewry, like Gaul, may be divided into three parts, each defined by its borders vis-a-vis the gentile world. There are the Orthodox, who not only insist on borders but wear them. They often dress in attire that sets them apart; they are even willing to look outlandish to gentiles in order to affirm their identity and their distinctive way of life. At the other extreme are Jews who have no borders, who may (or may not) assimilate and intermarry, whose politics may range from left to right, but who in any case accept the same set of rules for everyone. I respect both types.


But the third type presents problems. These are the Jews who maintain their borders furtively and deal disingenuously with gentiles. Raymond Chandler once observed of them that they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen as Jews by gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests while pretending that they have not such interests, using the charge of "anti-Semitism" as sword and shield. As Chandler put it, they are like a man who refuses to give his real name and address but insists on being invited to all the best parties. Unfortunately, it's this third type that wields most of the power and skews the rules for gentiles. The columnist Richard Cohen cites an old maxim: "Dress British, think Yiddish."


Americans ought to be free to discuss Jewish power and Jewish interests frankly, without being accused of denying the rights of Jews. That should go without saying. The truth is both otherwise and unmentionable.


[The preceding article was reprinted from the September, 1995, issue of Sobran's. For subscription information, call 1-800-493-4401, or write P.O. Box 1383, Vienna, VA 22183.]





The Controversy of Zion by DOUGLAS REED





Who Controlled Russia - Amazing Statistics




Courtesy: Excerpted from The Next World Order by A. Thomson

Copyright � 1994.


Douglas Reed in The Controversy of Zion concludes:  


... this only became clear when the [Russian/Bolshevik] revolution of 1917 produced an almost all-Jewish government in Russia; and by that time power [of Ashkenazim] over governments in the West was so great that the nature of this new regime was little discussed, a virtual law of heresy having come into force there.  


... This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times, who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English edition).  


These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprised 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People's Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others.  


The Moscow Cheka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918 - 1919 were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly "Socialist" or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of "opposition" was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton.  



It is also clear that this majority continued to be sustained long after the 'Jewish' revolution had toppled Russia's former 'Christian' rulers:  



In 1933 the American Jewish journal 'Opinion' stated that Jews occupied almost all important ambassadorial posts and that in White Russia 61 percent of all officials were Jews; it also stated that the Jewish percentage of the population (then given as 158,400,000) was "less than 2 percent". If this was true it meant that Russia at that time contained less than 3,000,000 Jews. In 1933 the 'Jewish Chronicle' stated that one-third of the Jews in Russia had become officials. If this was the case, they plainly formed the new governing class.  


Mr. Wilton indicated: "Taken according to numbers of population, the Jews represented one in ten; among the commissars that rule Bolshevist Russia they are nine in ten; if anything the proportion of Jews is still greater." This was plain reporting, and if the report had related to "Ukranians", for instance, instead of "Jews", none would have objected; the mere act of reporting a fact became the ground for secret denunciation because the fact related to Jews.  



...That was after the two conspiracies [Balfour Declaration on Palestine for the Jews and Bolshevik revolution], having grown in secrecy side by side, triumphed in the same week of 1917 ... Such was the state of the two-headed conspiracy in Russia when Dr. Weizmann grew to manhood and began to play his part. The word "conspiracy", frequently used here, is not the author's; Dr. Weizmann candidly employs it."  





In all this, the majority of Sephardhic Jews - with the notable exception of the wealthy Sephardhic bankers and industrialists played a minor role, or rather they were assigned a minor role, for the reasons that have already been stated. Just as the Israelites "ceased to exist" as far as the Levitical Judahite elite were concerned once they had become the official guardians of the Levitcal Law, so the Sephardhim have been largely ignored ever since Ashkenazi elite assumed control of Talmudic Judaism, and, Douglas Reed points out, their numbers have suddenly and inexplicably dwindled:  



The secretive life of Jewry has made the counting of Jewish heads impossible at all periods. This lack of any trustworthy figures of Jewish populations enabled the ruling sect a century ago to begin, and in our day almost to complete, an astonishing biological operation: they have transformed nearly all Jews into Ashkenazim!  


At the end of the 18th century the Jews known to the West were the Sephardhim, who inherited at least a tenuous tradition, a frail thread leading back through Spain to Africa, and fading then into a legend of Canaanitish origins. By the middle of the present century these Jews were declared by the elders of Jewry to have become almost extinct! A report presented to the Second World Sephardhic Conference held in New York in 1954 stated that the Jewish world population was 11,763,491; that only 1,744,883 (or 15 per cent) of these Jews were Sephardhim; and that merely 52000 of these Sephardhim lived in Europe (which formerly knew only Sephardhic Jews) and the entire Western Hemisphere.   








Douglas Reed

Mark Weber

As Egyptian journalist Mohamed Heikal notes in his foreword to the Arabic edition of Garaudy's Founding Myths, Douglas Reed was a very influential writer who was later consigned to public oblivion for writing frankly about Zionist power.


Born in Britain in 1895, Reed began working at the age of 13 as an office boy. At age 19 he worked as a bank clerk until enlisting in the British army at the outbreak of the First World War. At the age of 26, and "relatively unschooled" (as he once described himself), he began working for the London Times as a telephonist and clerk. He reached journalism at the age of 30 as a sub-editor. Three years later he was the venerable paper's assistant correspondent in Berlin, before transferring to Vienna as its chief central European correspondent. He went on to report, as a Times correspondent, from Warsaw, Moscow, Prague, Athens, Sofia, Bucharest, Budapest and other European centers.


He left The Times in 1938, almost simultaneously with the publication of his book Insanity Fair, which sold very well (including its US edition), and brought him world fame. He later wrote: "I let off all this pent-up steam and said just what I thought about the coming war and the folks who were letting it happen in a book, Insanity Fair." A year later came another bestseller, Disgrace Abounding, and then others, including Prophet at Home, All Our Tomorrows, Lest We Regret, and Somewhere South of Suez. Reed also found time to write four novels and a play.


He provided readers with elegantly-crafted reporting and analysis based on seasoned but common-sense observations of the international scene. Although he addressed all the major issues of the day, it was his forthright writing on the machinations and impact of the Zionist movement that got him into trouble. In Somewhere South of Suez (London: 1950), for example, he wrote:


... During all that period and to the present time, it was not possible freely to report or discuss a third vital matter: Zionist Nationalism. In this case the freedom of the press has become a fallacy during the past two decades ... When I came to America I found that this ban, for such it is in practice, prevailed even more rigidly than in my own country.... In daily usage, no American or British newspaper, apparently, now dares to print a line of news or comment unfavorable to the Zionist ambition ... The inference to me is plain: the Zionist Nationalists are powerful enough to govern governments in the great countries of the remaining West!  

In his next book Far and Wide (London: Jonathan Cape, 1951), Reed took a skeptical look at the much-hyped Jewish-Zionist claims of six million Jewish wartime deaths. He wrote:


During the Second World War I noticed that the figures of Jewish losses, in places where war made verification impossible, were being irresponsibly inflated, and said so in a book. The process continued until the war's end when the figure of six millions was produced (and the Arabs were immediately chastised). A transparently worthless estimate was not only being used for mass-delusion through newspapers, but even given official status!  

... No proof can be given that six million Jews 'perished'; proof can be adduced that so many could not have perished ... Certain mathematical rules govern destruction on such a scale; you need pursuers, jailers, prisons, camps, transport, executioners in numbers inconceivable ...


In a matter where nothing is verifiable, one thing seems sure: that six million Jews were never even contained in German-occupied territories ... Yet this massive assertion about the six millions was used by politicians in the highest places, by prosecutors at Nuremberg, and habitually by mass-newspapers which in lesser matters would print no statement unverified!


The familiar six million figure, Reed went on, is "one which not bear any scrutiny by independent investigators." Citing publicly available sources, he suggested that total Jewish wartime losses may have been between two and a half million and something more than three and a half million.


After the publication of Far and Wide, Reed was all but banned by establishment publishers. Still, he remained undaunted. His final book, The Controversy of Zion (Veritas [Australia] and Noontide [USA], 1985), provides a detailed and literate dissection of the origins and international impact of the Zionist movement, including its corrupting influence in Britain and the United States. Once again devoting several pages to the issue of Jewish wartime deaths, he concluded:


The starting point for consideration of this question [of Jewish wartime losses] is the fact that six million Jews, or anything approaching that number, cannot possibly have been 'done to death' or caused to 'perish' ... The very assertion, made before the Nuremberg court, was an affront to their 815,000 fighting-men, sailors and civilians, killed in all theatres of war, of which only the Western politicians of this century would have been capable.  

However little known Douglas Reed may be today, his work -- as Mohamed Heikal's foreword to the Arabic edition of Roger Garaudy's book attests -- has not gone entirely unappreciated.













The Rothschild Bloodline

... The Rockefellers were Marrano Jews… But it was the Rothschild capital that made the Rockefeller's so powerful. "...


"The Rothschilds introduced the rule of money into European 

politics. The Rothschilds were the servants of money who undertook 

the reconstruction of the world as an image of money and its 

functions. Money and the employment of wealth have become the law of 

European life; we no longer have nations, but economic provinces." 

(New York Times, Professor Wilhelm, a German historian, July 8, 



"[Jews] ate the English nation to its bones." (John Speed, British 

Historian, in Historie of Great Britaine).


"But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own 

people. Each victim on our side is worth a thousand Goyim." 

(Statement reported in a French Newspaper in 1773 after a meeting in 

the Rothschild home).


"It is necessary to gain the common people to our order. The best 

means to that end is influence in the schools." (The Jewish Founder 

of the Illuminati, Adam Weishaupt)


"Jews may adopt the customs and language of the countries where they 

live; but they will never become part of the native population." 

(The Jewish Courier, January 17, 1924).


"We are neither German, English or French. We are Jews and your 

Christian mentality is not ours." (Max Nordrow, a German Zionist 

Leader, in The Jewish World)



The Jewish owned Social Democratic Herald, on September 14, 1901,  characterized Negroes as "inferior...depraved elements' who went  around 'raping women and children.'"


The New York Journal American of February 3, 1949: "Today it is 

estimated by Jacob's grandson, John Schiff, that the old man sank 

about $20-million for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia."


"Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the 

rings of a ladder leading upward and upward...The Zionist Congress; 

the English Uganda proposition; the future World War; the Peace 

Conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish 

Palestine will be created." (Max Nordau, 6th Zionist Congress in 

Balse, Switzerland, 1903)


"When one lives in contact with the functionaries who are serving 

the Bolshevik Government, one feature strikes the attention, which, 

is almost all of them are Jews. I am not at all anti-Semitic; but I 

must state what strikes the eye: everywhere in Petrograd, Moscow, in 

provincial districts, in commissariats, in district offices, in 

Smolny, in the Soviets, I have met nothing but Jews and again 

Jews...The more one studies the revolution the more one is convinced 

that Bolshevism is a Jewish movement which can be explained by the 

special conditions in which the Jewish people were placed in 

Russia." (L'Illustration, September 14, 1918).


"The Gulag Archipelago, 'he informed an incredulous world that the 

blood-maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty-six million 

victims in Russia from 1918 to 1957! Solzhenitsyn cited Cheka Order 

No. 10, issued on January 8, 1921: 'To intensify the repression of 

the bourgeoisie.'" (Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago)


The names behind the Bolshevik (Russian/Communist) revolution


The most detailed description of Jewish influence in the

Bolshevik 'revolution comes from Robert Wilton, the Russian

correspondent of The Times. In 1920 he published a book in French,

Les Derniers Jours des Romanofs, which gave the racial background of

all the members of the Soviet government. (This does not appear in

the later English translation, for some odd reason.) After the

publication of this monumental work, Wilton was ostracised by the

press, and he died in poverty in 1925. 


He reported that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party was made up as follows:



Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew

Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew

Lourie (Larine) Jew

Ouritski Jew

Volodarski Jew

Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) Jew

Smidovitch Jew

Sverdlof (Yankel) Jew

Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew

Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian

Krylenko Russian

Lounatcharski Russian




"The Council of the People's Commissars comprises the following:




President Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian

Foreign Affairs Tchitcherine Russian

Nationalities Djugashvili (Stalin) Georgian

Agriculture Protian Armenian

Economic Council Lourie (Larine) Jew

Food Schlichter Jew

Army & Navy Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew

State Control Lander Jew

State Lands Kauffman Jew

Works V. Schmidt Jew

Social Relief E. Lelina (Knigissen) Jewess

Public Instruction Lounatcharsky Russian

Religions Spitzberg Jew

Interior Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew

Hygiene Anvelt Jew

Finance Isidore Goukovski Jew

Press Volodarski Jew

Elections Ouritski Jew

Justice I. Steinberg Jew

Refugees Fenigstein Jew

Refugees (assist.) Savitch Jew

Refugees (assist.) Zaslovski Jew




"The following is the list of members of the Central Executive Committee:



Sverdlov (president) Jew

Avanessof (sec.) Armenian

Bruno Lett

Babtchinski Jew

Bukharin Russian

Weinberg Jew

Gailiss Jew

Ganzburg Jew

Danichevski Jew

Starck German

Sachs Jew

Scheinmann Jew

Erdling Jew

Landauer Jew

Linder Jew

Wolach Czech

Dimanstein Jew

Encukidze Georgian

Ermann Jew

Joffe Jew

Karkline Jew

Knigissen Jew

Rosenfeldt (Kamenef) Jew

Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew

Krylenko Russian

KrassikofSachs Jew

Kaprik Jew

Kaoul Lett

Ulyanov (lenin) Russian

Latsis Jew

Lander Jew

Lounatcharski Russian

Peterson Lett

Peters Lett

Roudzoutas Jew

Rosine Jew

Smidovitch Jew

Stoutchka Lett

Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew

Sosnovski Jew

Skrytnik Jew

Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew

Teodorovitch Jew

Terian Armenian

Ouritski Jew

Telechkine Russian

Feldmann Jew

Froumkine Jew

Souriupa Ukranian

Tchavtchevadze Georgian

Scheikmann Jew

Rosental Jew

Achkinazi Imeretian

Karakhane Karaim (Jew)

Rose Jew

Sobelson (Radek) Jew

Sclichter Jew

Schikolini Jew

Chklianski Jew

Levine (Pravdine) Jew




"The following is the list of members of the Extraordinary Commission of Moscow:



Dzerjinski (president) Pole

Peters (vice-president) Lett

Chklovski Jew

Kheifiss Jew

Zeistine Jew

Razmirovitch Jew

Kronberg Jew

Khaikina Jewess

Karlson Lett

Schaumann Jew

Leontovitch Jew

Jacob Goldine Jew

Glaperstein Jew

Kniggisen Jew

Latzis Lett

Schillenkuss Jew

Janson Lett

Rivkine Jew

Antonof Russian

Delafabre Jew

Tsitkine Jew

Roskirovitch Jew

G. Sverdlof Jew

Biesenski Jew

Blioumkine Jew

Alexandrevitch Russian

I. Model Jew

Routenberg Jew

Pines Jew

Sachs Jew

Daybol Lett

Saissoune Armenian

Deylkenen Lett

Liebert Jew

Vogel German

Zakiss Lett



Although Lenin is described as a "Russian," in fact he was a mixture

of various nationalities. It is likely that he was one-quarter

Russian, one-quarter German, one-quarter Jewish and at least one-

quarter Kalmuck (Mongol), which accounts for his Mongol appearance. 


Various authorities allege that his wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya was a

Jewess and that her family spoke Yiddish in the home. 


A report sent to the British government in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke,

the Dutch consul in St. Petersburg, said that "Bolshevism is

organised and worked by Jews." The report was included in a pamphlet

published as a government White Paper in April 1919 entitled Russia

No. 1 (1919) A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. 


However, the pamphlet was quickly withdrawn and reissued with various excisions and alterations made. 


In the War Records Division of the United States National Archives

there is filed a report from an American Intelligence operative in

St. Petersburg. Under Record Group 20; Records of the American

Expeditionary Forces Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, G2 Intelligence

wrote, "The Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning,

guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type."

Also in the U.S. National Archives are two telegrams sent by

American diplomats in Russia. State Department document 861.00/1757

sent on 2 May 1918 by U.S. Consul Summers in Moscow relates, "Jews

predominant in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing

among population." Document 861.00/2205 from Consul Caldwell in

Vladivostock on 5 July 1918 describes, "Fifty per cent of Soviet

government in each town consists of Jews of worst type."


In January, 1924, Lenin died from causes variously described as 'a

heart attack,' brain hemorrhage' and 'syphilis.' His comrades

immediately began fighting amongst themselves to see who was to become his successor. 


A relative outsider, Joseph Stalin, came to the fore and purged all

competition either by exiling or executing them. Since Stalin was

not Jewish, yet nearly all his opponents were, it is often suggested

that Stalin was anti-Semitic. This is far from the truth. 


Stalin had three wives, all of them Jewesses. The first was

Ekaterina Svanidze who bore him one son, Jacob. His second wife was

Kadya Allevijah. She bore him a son Vassili and a daughter Svetlana. 


His second wife died in mysterious circumstances, either by

committing suicide or murdered by Stalin. His third wife was Rosa

Kaganovich, the sister of Lazar Kaganovich, the head of Soviet

industry. Stalin's daughter (who in 1967 fled to the USA) then

married Lazar's son Mihail i.e. her step-mother's nephew. Svetlana

Stalin had a total of four husbands, three of them Jewish. 


Stalin's vice-president Molotov was also married to a Jewess, whose

brother, Sam Karp, runs an export business in Connecticut. Just to

complicate things even more, the Molotov's (half-Jewish) daughter

also called Svetlana was engaged to be married to Stalin's son



After the death of Stalin, his successors kept up the tradition, for

a report in the B'nai B'rith Messenger relates: "To show that Russia

treats its Jews well, Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev this week

remarked at a reception at the Polish Embassy that not only he

himself and Soviet President Klementi Voroshilov, but also half the

members of the Praesidium have Jewish wives. Mr. Kruschev made this

remark to Israeli Ambassador Joseph Avidar, who was amongst the

guests." (Kruschev's wife was yet another Kaganovitch.)


According to a report in The Canadian Jewish News of 13 November

1964 the present Soviet boss Leonid Brezhnev is married to a Jewess,

and his children are brought up as Jews. There are a number of

prominent Jews in the Soviet government, including Dimitri Dymshits

in charge of industry, Lev Shapiro regional secretary of Birobidjan,

and Yuri Andropov in charge of the secret police, the KGB. In fact,

every secret police chief in Soviet history has been a Jew, from the

first Uritsky to the most recent, the murderous Beria. A Jew is also

in charge of the Soviet economy - Leonid Kantorovich. 


It is a well-known fact that the Bolsheviks were and are financed by

Jewish interests in the West. 


At a Bolshevik celebration rally in New York's Carnegie Hall on the

night of 23 March 1917, a telegram of support from Jacob Schiff of

Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was read out. The telegram was reprinted in the

next morning's New York Times. Schiff later tried to deny his

involvement, but thirty years later his grandson John admitted in

the New York Journal-American (3 February 1949) that the old man had

sunk twenty million dollars into the Bolshevik cause. 


Another Western bankers who poured funds into Bolshevik Russia was

Olaf Ashberg of the Stockholm Nia Banken. He remained the Soviets'

paymaster until the late 1940s. The London Evening Standard of 6

September 1948 reported a visit by Ashberg to Switzerland "for

secret meetings with Swiss government officials and banking

executives. Diplomatic circles describe Mr. Ashberg as the 'Soviet

banker' who advanced large sums to Lenin and Trotsky in 1917. At the

time of the revolution, Mr. Ashberg gave Trotsky money to form and

equip the first unit of the Red Army."


The Bolsheviks also received assistance from Armand Hammer, who

still commutes back and forward between New York and Moscow to take

care of his business interests in both communities. Hammer's

Occidental Oil Company is at the moment building a 1600 mile

chemicals pipeline in southern Russia. He is also on such good terms

with the Soviets that he personally arranges for Soviet art

galleries to lend paintings to America. 


Another American-based businessman to help out the Soviet economy is

Michael Fribourg, who owns the massive Continental Grain Company. 


Together with the Louis Dreyfus Corporation, these Jewish

speculators were able to buy up vast quantities of cheap American

grain in 1972, sell it to the Soviets at a vast profit, and collect

an export subsidy from the U.S. taxpayer. 


In every other East European country, it is exactly the same story:

In Hungary a Communist revolution was staged in 1919, instigated by

the Jew Bela Kun (Cohen). During the three month regime, the country

was turned upside down in a reign of murder and terror. Here again,

the government was composed almost entirely of Jews. And it was this

factor which brought about the regime's downfall, as the ordinary

Hungarians detested Jewish dictatorship. Kun was deposed and fled to

the Soviet Union, where he became chief of the secret police, the

Cheka, in southern Russia. 


It was not until 1945 that the Jews were able to regain control. 


Three Russian Jews were installed as the ruling triumvirate, Matyas

Rakosi (Rosencranz), Erno Gero (Singer) and Zoltan Vas. Both Rakosi

and Gero had been members of Kun's bloody government. 


In Germany, the Jews also tried to take over there in the chaos that

followed the First World War. Aided by funds from the Soviet

Ambassador Joffe, Rosa Luxemburg's Spartacus Bund attempted to

overthrow the government. The revolt was quelled and its leaders

Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht executed. 


The post-war dictator of Roumania, Anna Pauker, was the daughter of

a Bucharest kosher butcher. For a time she earned her living

teaching Hebrew. her father and brother now live in Israel. 


Although Tito was the only non-Jewish dictator behind the Iron

Curtain in the late 1940s, he was tutored by the Jew Mosa Pijade. 


According to John Gunther in Behind the Iron Curtain, "He is Tito's

mentor... Whatever ideological structure Tito may have, he got it

from the shrewd old man."

Moscow's puppet government in Czechoslovakia in the late 1940s was

run by another Jew, Rudolph Slansky. 


In Poland too, Jews occupied virtually every position of authority

in the post-war Communist regime. Prominent among these were Minc,

Skryesewski, Modzelewski and Berman. Jacob Berman gradually eclipsed

the others until he became supreme dictator by himself. Also,

Gomulka's wife was a Jewess. 


Even in China, Soviet Jews were at work helping Mao Tse Tung. High

up in the Political Department of the Red Army in China were W. N.  Levitschev and J. B. Gamarnik. 



From Let My People Go!, Empirical Publications, Northern Ireland

circa 1976






The Controversy of Zion  


by Douglas Reed  


A summary by Knud Eriksen, 1998  


In the foreword to the 1985-edition of Douglas Reeds book, the author Ivor Benson describes, how the intervening years from 1956, when the book  was completed, until 1985, have confirmed Douglas Reeds interpretation of the past 2.000 years of history in every way. He covers the continued role of the Middle East as the tinderbox, that can become the cause of the next world war, and the continued suppression and misrepresentation, in the media, of all news and discussion.  


It was only the few who knew the background of Talmudic Zionism and Communism, who had a chance to understand such decisive events as the so-called ‘Six-days-war’ and the later massive invasion of Lebanon in 1982. The invasion was supposed to do away with the PLO, it was said, but in reality it was simply a part of the old Great-Israel-plan (Eretz-Israel). Just as is today’s invasion of Iraq.  


The pro-Israel mass-media picture of Israel as a small, innocent democracy, which was constantly in need of help, became more and more untrustworthy, so not many were surprised, when the English Institute of Strategic Studies could report, that Israel had become the worlds fourth greatest military power after The United States, Soviet and China, but way ahead of nations like England and France. After the fall of the Soviet Union, this country, with a population about the same size as the tiny Danish one, may even have risen further on this top-4-list!  


The change in the reactions of the Jews themselves at this time - 1982 - was significant: After the massacre of 1.500 men, women and children in two palestinian refugee-camps in Beirut, the Western media timidly withheld comments, while 350.000 inhabitants of Tel Aviv protested against their own government.  


Douglas Reed seems to have foreseen this development also, for among the last words in his book - from 1956 - are the following: ‘I think, that the Jews of the world are beginning to realize the wrong of revolutionary Zionism, the twin of the other destructive movement, Communism, and that towards the end of this 20th Century they will finally have decided to join in the ranks of mankind.’  


The book starts out with a 1789-quotation from the philosopher Edmund Burke who, in Reflections on the Revolution, directed a literary attack on the French Revolution:  


‘Something has happened which it is hard to speak about and impossible to keep silent about.’  



World Revolution, Zionism and World Government  


The World Revolution, which in this century (20th) has destroyed human civilization to an unheard of degree - so far - was only one of the two revolutionary movements, which spread like an epidemic pest over the world from the same week in October 1917. Both sprang from talmudic-lead Eastern Jews. The World Revolution has been the climax, so far, of judaic world conquest. The defeat of the Revolution is only apparent. Its destructive effect continues a bit more covertly without Soviet, but still with China as an example of this type of terror-lead slave society, and with judaic agents solidly placed on the most important posts in the world. All the ‘spiritual values’ continue, as f.ex. also in the EU.  


And its twin, Revolutionary Zionism, grows ever stronger towards the envisioned Eretz-Israel - Great Israel, which is to stretch from the Nile to the Eufrat in the whole ‘original area’, with all the’Jews’ of the world brought together there, and with Jerusalem as the world capital and centre of the ‘World Peace of the World Government’.  


Everything is supported by the Pentateuch of the Old Testament, supplemented by the Talmud, concerning the predestination of the ‘Chosen People’ to exterminate or subjugate all other nations. Among the Zionist leaders this is taken one hundred percent seriously. Like a military operation the two groups work together with incredible synchronization towards the all-domineering World Government. It will not be long before it becomes a reality. We see it happening every day: UN, NATO, EU, WTO, International Treaties and Conventions, International Courts with transnational jurisdiction and the hundreds- even thousands - of international mergers and take-over’s in business.  


Also the idea of world government has its background in The Old Testament and the Talmud. It is ‘The Chosen People’, which arranges matters according to the text, with the rest of the world as slaves. The greatest achievements of both movements took place in the periods of confusion close to the end of-, and right after the two worlds wars, which were started by the leaders of these two movements. Only the Revolution and Zionism came out as winners after the two global wars, with their inconceivable suffering.




Victors in the first global war


After the First World War the Revolution was fixed in Russia with terror and extermination of all ‘classes’ down to - and including - the Kulak, a farmer with 3 cows. It was an almost exclusively Jewish government, which wielded this terror. It was to last for 70 years, with roughly 100 million murders on its conscience.  


Although western media, especially from 1952 on, carried on about ‘anti-semitism’ in the Soviet, this was never anything but bluff, because these Soviet Jewish leaders simply got cold feet as the reign of terror came to be known as the Empire of Evil. In reality it was only different fractions fighting each other. The most obvious ‘Jewish’ representatives were withdrawn, but the power structure, especially in the secret police, that had the decisive power, remained ‘Jewish’. ‘Anti-semitism’ was severely punished (right up until the fall of the Soviet Union, and possibly still is) and was therefore quite unthinkable.  


Right after the Revolution there was a death penalty for being in possession of ‘The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’ - which was apparently one of the ‘Jews’ - plans for world conquest through revolution, and for breaking down Christian countries.   


At the same time Zionism, with the Balfour-Declaration of October 1917, had obtained a promise from Great Britain, in return for bringing The United States into the World War, to give to the Jews ‘a national home’ in Palestine.  


Slowly the pressure on the politicians of the West was increased, in order to make this a reality. Especially on the American ones, who were surrounded by Jewish ‘advisers’, and the immigration to the area increased enormously by the miraculous remedy of ‘Anti-semitism’, combined with the support of jewish tycoons and western pro-Zionist leaders in the inter-war period.  


And the League of Nations became the first core of the World Government, also with Zionists on high posts, pulling strings.  




And in the next global war..........  


In the same way it was only these three movements - Communism, Zionism, and World Government, that profited from the suffering and destruction of the Second World War. The Western Powers helped the World Revolution to entrench itself deep in Europe.  


General Eisenhower ordered the Western generals to stop at a line Vienna-Berlin. All of the Eastern European countries, the ‘liberation’ of which had supposedly been what the whole war was all about, were sacrificed to the revolutionary terror at the Yalta-conference.  


At first Zionism supported Hitler financially and with a hesitant or even obliging press. Then, in 1933, it declared Holy War on him.  


Zionists obtained so much compassion for Jews after the persecution and the much-advertised extermination, that the world powers and the populations of the West accepted a division of Palestine and the ‘re-settling’ of Jews in the area. The Arabs were deliberately sacrificed, and this started one of our times most dangerous anti-Western hate-waves - strongly maintained ever since.  


Reed gives many examples of the ‘special sufferings’ of the Jews during the war being only media-fabricated lies. In ratio to their numbers they didn’t suffer any more or any less than other people, but this was an example of the phenomenon, that everything must focus on Jews. Other peoples  have suffered far more, numerically. At the end of the war, and shortly thereafter, Zionists received enormous loads of weapons from the Soviet Union. And several hundred thousands of Jews emigrated from a country, which no-one else could get out of, so that soon they became a well-armed majority, being able to drive the original population away by Old Testament terror. The result was 600.000 miserable refugees.  


The United Nations, which was originally planned and organized by Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White, both later exposed as Jewish communist spies, was to become a temporary climax of a judaic-dominated World Government. It’s many ramifications all had as their most important purpose to reduce the sovereign nations to municipalities, and to give unlimited power to the organisation itself. Naturally in order to ‘secure peace’, just like the League of Nations. For many years the organisation was communist-dominated, and its many condemnations of israeli terror were never followed up by action.  


The unconditional support from Western leaders for an ever-growing Great-Israel leads towards a World Government with-, or without a Third World War. Israel’s open nationalism and racism gets no serious criticism from a Zionist-dominated ‘public opinion’. The West is closing down its own states as ‘antiquated’, and they are more and more under the control  of the swelling international organisations, dominated by ‘Jewish’ agents. The pattern of setting Western powers up against each other and letting them bleed to death, is now worked in thoroughly, and has become almost an exact science.  


The ‘Jewish Agents’ of the West, who are working for either Zionist or Communist success, are now behaving in an unrestrained, treasonable manner and quite in accordance with ‘The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’ for destruction of ‘Christian Nations’. A Third World War could be the third act, which these forces consider necessary to gain complete control in the ensuing need and confusion.  


Sacrificing many of their ‘own people’ has been acceptable, even necessary, before, in order to maintain a government based on fear, and also for populating Israel through manufactured ‘anti-semitism’.  


And then we get the war ... unless enough people, the world over, wake up and pull the war-mongers away from the ‘handle for the big bang.’



The history of the previous 2.000 years  


The author supports his arguments by quoting statements, writings and actions made by ‘Jews’. The description of the development of Zionism, in the last Century, for instance, focuses on Chaim Weizmann, who was a key figure in the political Zionist intrigues, and who became the first president of Israel. A special source is Weizmanns auto-biography from 1949, Trial and Error.  


The Jewish background of Communism and World Revolution is a fact, and enormous amounts of money have been spent exactly to try to hide this. Probably no other secret has cost as much to maintain. But Jewish sources exist, that admit it. Both Jewish historians, communist leaders, newspaper articles and reports from the time of The Revolution are used as source material.  


As to the longer historical perspective, Reed particularly supports his arguments by reference to the strongly Zionist historian, Dr. Josef Kastein, whose book, History and Destiny of the Jews, appeared in 1933. 


However, Reed also uses many other sources, all mentioned in the bibliography in the book. 


Kasteins book covers the same time-span as ‘The Controversy’, and much information in Dr. Kasteins book can be taken as direct evidence of Douglas Reeds conclusions.



The Master Race   


The misery began in the year 458 b.C., when a small tribe in the old Judea accepted a creed based on race. The tribe had previously been expelled by the Israelites for such racism. This seemingly unimportant event has probably caused more destruction for Mankind than both the existence of explosives and epidemics. The tribe adapted the creed of the Master Race as nothing less than ‘The Law’.  


The Judeans were a small tribe under the Persian king. The creed of Judaism was not the beginning of monotheism, as has been propagated. Monotheism dates all the way back to The Egyptian Book of the Dead, 2.600 years b.C. and maybe even further. Judaism, on the contrary, was the exact anti-thesis, namely the worship of a racist tribal god.  


‘The Law’ or ‘The Pact’ was - and is - unique in being based on a statement from a tribal god, to the effect that his ‘chosen people’: ‘the Israelites’ (in reality, the Judeans) would be set above all other peoples and settled in a ‘promised land’, if only they would stick to all of his rules and judgements. If Jehova, then, was to be worshipped in a certain place, it followed, that when the worshippers were not actually in that place, they were being ‘persecuted’, in ‘captivity’ and had to ‘destroy’ the ‘strangers’ that ‘kept them in captivity’. Only in this way was Jehovah to be a god for all other peoples - as the punishing god, who punished his own people first - by a ‘captivity’ among the heathens for their ‘transgressions against the law’ and then, as by an exact script, punished the strangers by a predestined extermination, when ‘the chosen people’ had followed all the rules to the letter.  


It was probably not even a pact with the Judaeans, for according to ‘The Holy Scripture’, the pact was made with the Israelites, who had long since mingled with the rest of Mankind, and who have never known this racist creed as far as we know. The Jewish Encyclopaedia says, that the Judeans ‘probably were a non-Israeli tribe’. The Israelites turned away from the racism of the Judeans. The creed has gone down in history as having been created by the Levites from Judea.  


What happened before 458 b.C. is mainly mythology, unlike the later, most important events. 


The written record predates 458 b.C. by a couple of centuries, when the Israelites rejected the Judeans.  


The history of Moses was taken by the Israelites from the widespread mythology, which goes all the way back to the history of the Babylonean king, Sargon the Elder, 2.000 years earlier. 


The ten commandments are much like similar commandments from the Egyptians, the Babyloneans and the Assyrians. 


These common ideas about one god for all mankind, the Levites, the rulers of Judea, then put in reverse, when they wrote down their laws. They founded the permanent counter-movement against all universal religions and identified the names Judea and Jews, with the doctrine of self-made separation from Mankind, racial hatred, murder in the name of religion, and revenge. Also the personification of treason, a Judas, was included right from the beginning of Judea.  


The stories of Moses, leading a mass-exodus from Egypt, can not be true, even according to Dr. Kastein. It was invented, as a necessity, in order to fit into the pattern of ‘Jehovahs revenge’, the destructive basic principle of Judaism.  


The Israelites had, as the larger part of a segregated group of people, settled in the northern part of Canaan. In the south, surrounded by the original canaanites, the tribe of Judah took shape. Thus the name ‘Judaism’ and ‘Jew’.  


This tribe was isolated from-, and did not get along well with, the neighbours, right from the start. There is much mystery concerning it, including its beginnings. It seems more to have been expelled than chosen. And in the following editions of ‘The Holy Scriptures’, written by their scribes, who wrote whatever suited them arose, in the course of the centuries, and in more and more places, the commands ‘destroy completely’, ‘tear down’, ‘exterminate’ etc.  


The Israelites had withdrawn, then, from the ‘Judeans’ racist beliefs and had mingled with the rest of Mankind. They ‘disappeared’ in this way as a separate people, while the Judeans kept to themselves by strict racial laws.  


In the course of time these were further sharpened and expanded to regulate even the most trivial daily details. The punishments for breaking the laws were severe, and common ‘Jews’ came completely under the control of the scribes. It was this spiritual ghetto, which became the forerunner for the physical ghetto and for the antagonism and exclusion by others, of the Jews, as a retribution.   


Talmud and Treason  


In the Babylonean ‘captivity’ the scribes added four ‘Moses’-books to the 5th, which had been the first. They expanded, in this way, further the intolerant racial religion, which would keep the Jews separated from the rest of mankind forever, if it could be enforced. And in Babylon they found the means. The religious leaders actually succeeded in keeping their congregation completely separated from the surroundings. They obtained authority with those, who kept them ‘in captivity’ for use against ‘their own’, and finally, in the year 536 b.C., to show their gratitude, they destroyed the entire host-country through treason, through the help of the army of a new ruler, king Cyprus of Persia, who, in turn, they then destroyed etc... the well-known pattern, which was later perfected and used, among many other occasions,  in the two world wars in The 20th Century. ‘The Jews’, by the way, at least the leaders, had a fine time in Babylon, according to Dr. Kastein. They were completely free. The narrative of the destruction of Babylon created an image of an irresistible destructive power. This was another pattern, which was further expanded by the scribes.  


Treason was always the return for hospitality. According to Dr. Kastein, the Jews were instrumental in the destruction of the Babyloneans, the Persians, the Egyptians, the Greeks and the Romans. Each time by ‘stretching out open arms’ to a conqueror.  


This situation has continued up through the centuries. Simultaneously, the chains of the common Jews were tightened more and more, and from the time of Jesus the Talmud had been developed, as a collection of scriptures, which contain rules of conduct for everything, particularly directed against Christianity. The new religion of tolerance, which was the direct opposite of the Levitical racial hatred, constituted the worst danger for the scribes - that of loosing their grip on the congregation. If the many Jewish rules of conduct were broken, this was punished severely, even by death. The Jewish authorities held the common Jews in a grip of terror by means of an authority, given them by the ‘Christian’ rulers. After Rome had lost its patience with the Jews, Jerusalem was destroyed in the year 70 and the Jews were scattered in the surrounding countries.  






The world leadership in Judaism, which in Jerusalem was called the Sanhedrin, ‘the wise men of Zion’, moved around during the next centuries, as a mobile government with incredible power over the scattered congregations. After the destruction of Jerusalem the headquarters were moved to Jamnia, where it remained for about 100 years. Thereafter it was Usha in Galilea, then, as always because of ‘persecution’, it moved back to Sura in Babylon. For 600 years the world leadership remained in Jamnia, Usha and Galilea, in the oriental climate, where it belonged. When the world center was then moved to Spain, as a result of the moslem conquests (!) a long painful coexistence with the Christian countries began, in which the ‘oriental’ mentality was not understood and appreciated. These sufferings are about to destroy the West in our time.  




Treason in ‘Spanish’  


In the Christian Spain treason was repeated. As in Babylon and Egypt the Jews turned against the people among whom they lived. They opened the gates of the city for the conquerors and was thereafter given custody of the raped city by the moslems ... against whom they also turned in the end. Once more they were thrown out for bad behaviour,  in 1492. They obviously were identified with the moslem conquerors and thrown out together with them. Among the worst ‘persecutions’ they had had to endure, was being forbidden to keep slaves! (prof. Graetz): ‘hereafter the Jews could neither buy Christians as slaves nor recieve them as presents.’   


They had, by this time, been in Spain for 800 years. Most of them went back to Northern Africa, from where they had come,  or they went to Egypt, Palestine, Italy, The greek Islands and Turkey. Other colonies had arisen in France, Germany, Holland and England, and these also recieved some of the expelled. Wherever they settled down, the religious leaders always had the local prince help them retain power over their congragation. Total power. Some of these Jews became very wealthy and they particularly developed loan capitalism as their power base. They lent large sums to extravagant princes, and in return for these recieved many privileges as court Jews. The best known representative for this money-power was the Rotschild family, which in the 19th century had become the real rulers of Europe.  


Then the world leadership of Judaism was then moved to Poland.  




The Chazars  


This is one of the central mysteries. Why Poland’ There was no information about any considerable part of the Spanish Jews having moved to Poland, or information that any earlier mass-immigration of Jews into Poland had taken place. In the 15-hundreds a (Jewish) population, counting millions, suddenly arose (Dr. Kastein). But populations of millions do not suddenly arise, and Dr. Kastein evades the question. Behind this suppressed knowledge lies the key to understanding the following history of Zionism. The Jewish headquarter was established amidst these so-called Eastern Jews, of whom even the Western Jews had, until then, only heard rumors, and of which the rest of the world knew nothing. From then on they took over the leadership of World Judaism. They were descendants of the Chazars, a people of Turkish-mongoloid origin, who had converted to Judaism around the 7th Century a.C. From here an even harsher segregation was ordered by ‘the wise ones’.  Meanwhile, the western Jews were slowly becoming ‘assimilated’ in the Western European population, especially after the legislation that followed the French Revolution, which gradually gave them full civil rights. This eastern group gradually took over the leadership of ‘Judaism’ to such a degree, that the Jewish ‘statistics’ ‘ which by the way have always been quite untrustworthy ‘ practically let them disappear. Today eastern Jews constitute at least 90 % of all Jews, according to these statistics, both in Israel and in the rest of the world.  


The western Jews who, by using fantasy and a maximum of twisting of truth, claimed to have once lived in Palestine, were slowly becoming assimilated, after having been thrown out of Spain, and almost ‘disappeared’ as en entity. In their stead appeared the Eastern Jews, an Asian people, which had never had the slightest connection with Palestine.  


And, suddenly, also the the world headquarters of the Jews disappeared. According to Dr. Kastein it ‘ceased to exist’.  




World Government without Address  


There was, however, not much indication that this was so. But it became secret after 1772, when Poland was divided, and the larger part of the Jews came under Russian rule. Such a world headquarter had existed for over 2.500 years, and now it was supposed to have suddenly disappeared. It could, nevertheless, be assembled, when Napoleon called in ‘The great Sanhedrin’ in 1807, in order to get clarity concerning the loyalty of French Jews or lack of same. Dr. Kastein, himself, reveals joyfully, that ‘in  the 19th Century a Jewish International took shape’.  


The 19th Century belonged to the revolutionary conspiracies of both Zionism and Communism, which unfolded in the 20th Century. It was also in that Century, that the physical ghetto was replaced by a mental one: the fear of ‘Antisemitism’. In Jewish families, the question was whether to further Revolutionary Communism or Revolutionary Zionism (Weizmann). It ended up being both. Communism should tear down all nations. Zionism should establish one. A World Government without an address was becoming a fashion, which has been followed undeviatingly all through the 20th Century.  




World Revolution and Master Race   


The British statesman, Benjamin Disraeli (a baptised Jew) said, that Jews were behind all the revolutions in the middle of the Century (from 1848), and there was significant participation by Jews also in the French Revolution. However, according to Reed, no Jewish leadership of the initial intrigues has been traced. It was secret societies, especially the Jacobins, who played the leading part, and these could be traced back to the German professor Adam Weishaupt, who in 1776 founded the Illuminati, a secret society, directed against all Christian authorities. Soon it had infiltrated all of the European freemasonry and it then went on to America. The conspiracy of the Illuminati, which was accidentally revealed by the Bavarian government in 1787, contained almost, word by word, the same text in their program as the later ‘Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’ (Nesta Webster) and it was clearly recognizable in the theories of the Russian Revolution. 


The ‘Russian’ Revolution was the first, which was Jewish without any doubt (around 90% of the leaders were Jews) and this revolution, along with the First World War was the first clear evidence, that ‘The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’ were being followed literally in the major events of the world.   


Reed gives several other examples of this script being an exact prophecy for the nearest future or a frightening plan for world conquest. (See  Chapter  ‘The Protocols’, in Reeds book and the whole text of the Protocols under "Links" and "More"). It may never be proven, whether they are ‘Jewish’ or not. More importantly, Reed frequently points out, that it has been mostly Jewish dissidents, who have warned against them. He mentions several. But the details of the World Government are being put in place day after day.  


Knud Bjeld Eriksen, 6. February 1998













Robert Weinert


[email protected]

[email protected]




jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition


Hit Counter


Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party