Parts 25 through 30
By Willie Martin

Jew Watch


History -Part  25

Magna Carta

It was the Magna Carta that was forced upon King John at Runneymede and caused the power of the Jews to wane and caused their eventual expulsion from the country.

1) Now we can understand why the Federal Reserve system has never been audited, let alone expelled from our country.

2) Now we can understand why we still have "star-chamber" courts where white collar crime is swept under the rug.

3) Now we can understand why billions of dollars can be stolen from the savings and loans associations, banks and other lending associations.

4) Now we can understand why the American taxpayers end up paying for it all.

5) Now we can understand why we can have insider trader frauds and the Americans who invested in those companies are losing their life's savings to Jewish Wall Street manipulators. Who are required to pay fines, to the government, and not to the men and women who lost those savings. Is that justice? I think not!

"John, by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy, Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Earls, Barons, Justiciaries, Foresters...and his faithful subjects, greeting. Know ye, that we, in the presence of God, and for the salvation of our soul, and the souls of all our ancestors and heirs, and unto the honor of God and the advancement of Holy Church, and amendment of our Realm...have, in the first place, granted to God, and by this our present Charter confirmed, for us and our heirs for ever:

'That the Church of England shall be free, and have her whole rights, and her liberties...We also have granted to all the freemen of our kingdom for us and our heirs for ever, all the underwritten liberties to be hand and holden by them and their heirs, of us and our heirs for ever...No scutage or aid shall be imposed in our kingdom, unless by the general council of our kingdom; except for ransoming our person, making our eldest son a knight, and once for marrying our eldest daughter; and for these there shall be paid no more than a reasonable aid. In like manner it shall be concerning the aids of the City of London.

And the City of London shall have its ancient liberties and free customs, as well by land as by water: furthermore, we will and grant that all other cities and boroughs, and towns and ports, shall have all their liberties and free customs. And for holding the general council of the kingdom concerning the assessment of aids, except in the three cases aforesaid, and for the assessing of scutages we shall cause to be summoned the archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, and greater barons of the realm, singly by our letters.

And furthermore, we shall cause to be summoned generally, by our sheriffs and bailiffs, all others who hold us in chief, for a certain day. That is to say, forty days before their meeting at least, and to a certain place; and in all letters of such summons we will declare the cause of such summons. And summons being thus made, the business shall proceed on the day appointed, according to the advice of
such as shall be present, although all that were summoned came not...

A freeman shall not be amerced for a small offense, but only according to the degree of the offense; and for a great crime according to the heinousness of it, saving to him his contentment; and after the same manner a merchant, saving to him his merchandise. And a villain shall be amerced after the same manner, saving to him his wainage, if he falls under our mercy; and none of the aforesaid americaments shall be assessed but by the oath of honest men in the neighborhood.

Earls and barons shall not be amerced but by their peers, after the degree of the offense...No constable or bailiff of ours shall take corn or other chattels of any man unless he presently give him money for it, or hath respite of payment by the good-will of the seller.

No constable shall distrain any knight to give money for castle-guard, if he himself will do it in his person, or by another able man, in case he cannot do it through any reasonable cause...No sheriff or bailiff of ours, or any other, shall take horses or carts of any freeman for carriage, without the assent of the said freeman.

Neither shall we nor our bailiffs take any man's timber for our castles or other uses, unless by the consent of the owner of the timber...If one who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, die before that loan be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest while the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt falls into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal sum contained in the bond.

And if anyone die, indebted to the Jews, his wife shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if any children of the deceased are left under age, necessaries shall be provided for them in keeping with holding of the deceased; and out of the residue the debt shall be paid, reserving, however, service due to feudal lords; in like manner let it be done touching debts due to others than Jews.

Nothing from henceforth shall be given or taken for a writ of inquisition of life or limb, but it shall be grated freely, and not denied...No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or banished, or any ways destroyed, nor will we pass upon him, nor will we send upon him, unless by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny to any man, either justice or right...

If any one has been dispossessed or deprived by us, without the lawful judgment of his peers, of his lands, castles, liberties, or right, we will forthwith restore them to him; and if any dispute arise upon his head, let the matter be decided by the five-and-twenty barons hereafter mentioned, for the preservation of the peace...All unjust and illegal fines made by us, and all americaments imposed unjustly and contrary to the law of the land, shall be entirely given up, or else be left to the decision of the five-and-twenty barons hereafter mentioned for the preservation of the peace, or of the major part of the, together with the aforesaid Stephen, Archbishop of Canterbury, if he can be present, and others whom we shall think fit to invite...All the aforesaid customs and liberties, which we have grated to be holden in our kingdom, as much as it belongs to us, all people in our kingdom, as well clergy as laity, shall observe, as far as they are concerned, towards their dependents.

And whereas, for the honor of God and the amendment of our kingdom, and for the better quieting the discord that has arisen between us and our barons, we have granted all these things aforesaid; willing to render them firm and lasting, we do give and grant our subjects the underwritten security, namely that the barons may choose five-and-twenty barons of the kingdom whom they think convenient, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties we have granted them, and by this our present Charter confirmed in this manner...Given under our hand, in the presence of the witnesses above named, and many others, in the meadow called Runneymede, between Windsor and Staines, the 15th day of June, in the 17th year of our reign."

This Charter clearly shows the disdain and disgust that our ancestors had for the Jews, and it was not because of some sort of anti-Semitism; It was because they are thieves, swindlers, murderers and rifraff.

But the principles of the World of God are always true. Eventually, the people understand that they are in bondage and they cry unto God. When the people truly repent for allowing these things to happen, God sends prophets to teach and then there is always another Gideon.

Winston Churchill made the following statement about the Magna Carta in his works A History of the English Speaking Peoples: "Now for the first time the King himself is bound by the law. The root principle was destined to survive across the generations and rise paramount long after the feudal background of 1215 had faded in the past. The Charter became in the process of time an enduring witness that the power of the Crown was not absolute.

The facts embodied in it and the circumstances giving rise to them were buried or misunderstood. The underlying idea of the sovereignty of law, long existent in feudal custom, was raised by it into a doctrine for the national state. And when in subsequent ages the State, swollen with its own authority, has attempted to ride roughshod over the rights or liberties of the subject it is to this doctrine that appeal has again and again been made, and never, as yet, without success." It was many centuries later, here in America, that an appeal was again made to that doctrine of inalienable rights because a government was "swollen with its own authority."

And now, near the close of the twentieth century, just two hundred short years later, another government, led by the International Jewish Bankers, has become swollen with its own authority and is riding roughshod over the rights and liberties of its subjects, its citizens. And it is for the exact same reasons as in the days of the Norman kings that the American people have become disenchanted with the process of government in our own land.

At first, the Talmudic system sounds so good. "Two chickens in every pot and from each according to his ability and to each according to his needs." We will have day-care centers for our children because this "great" system has forced nearly every mother to work to help purchase those "two chickens and the pot."

A. We now have great public works projects to bring the civilization up to the standards of ancient Rome.

B. We now have judges who MAKE the law instead of simply refereeing the actions of a trial by jury.

C. We now have jails full of people instead of retribution for all crimes except those which require the death penalty.

This "new" Talmudic concept gave us the public school system which require all students to proceed at the same pace regardless of individual abilities. As a result, this great system has given us students who score at the bottom scholastically among the industrialized nations. They are grossly overweight and physically out of shape. At the same time many think of themselves as being among the best, if not the best, in the world. Such a combination makes them "fat, dumb and happy."

Our country is dangerously close to a popular uprising. The one thing that is holding it back is the indifference among the average church leader. That is caused by the total misunderstanding of the misnomer "Judeo-Christian." That is a term of recent origin and in reality it CAN NOT exist. Some of these churchmen are slowly learning. It is either the Talmud or the Bible.

George Washington's Surrender

"And many of the people of the land became Jews." (Esther 9:17) The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians.

History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General George Washington that American independence came, and we have lived many years in happiness until the tribulations of the twentieth century.

Jonathon Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that, "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown."

Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: "Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all- seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry." And indeed George Washington himself was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army.

Cornwallis well knew that his military defeat was only the beginning of world catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control could be accomplished through a false religion. What he predicted has come to pass. A brief sketch of American religious history shows us that Masonry has infused into every church in America with their veiled Phallic religion. Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell started Jehovah Witnesses' Judaism which is now worldwide with their message of the divine kingdom. Mason Joseph Smith started Mormon Judaism with its Jewish teaching of millennialism. At the turn of the twentieth century there appeared the Scofield Bible with a Jewish interpretation of the prophecies.

With wide use of this "helpful" aid, almost all of the American churches have silently become synagogues. We now have Baptist Jews, Methodist Jews, Church of God Jews, apostate Catholic Jews, Fundamentalist Jews, and many Protestant Jews throughout America. We are aliens in our own country because of false religion. All are praying for divine deliverance into that "Divine Government" which Cornwallis knew to be the British Empire. A false religion has been used to deceive us into allegiance to our enemies of Yorktown and Bunker Hill, who in turn were under the complete control of the Jewish Cahalla.

No! Not a gun has been fired but the invisible malignant process of conquering America with the Jew's religion has gone on unabated. The Union Jack has been planted in our hearts with religious deception. All has happened "legally," "constitutionally" "freely" and completely within our most sacred trust, our churches. Religious deception is painless inoculation against truth. It cannot be removed from the conscience with surgery, yet it is the motivator of our actions and directly controls our lives. Once man gives over to false religion, he is no longer rational because he originates no original thought. His life is controlled by whomever controls his religion. The veil of false religion is the sword of Damacles and its power to control humanity defies even the imagination of the tyrants who use it.

This is not to say that George Washington was a traitor willingly, or even knowingly. He was beguiled into a Satanic religious order that insidiously controls men's minds. So have American statesmen and military leaders down through the years given aid and allegiance to the enemies of the United States because they did not have knowledge of the invisible subterfuge that stalks this land. Many eyes were opened when they read Wagner's Freemasonry An Interpretation [Given by Senator Joseph McCarthy, six months before his mouth was closed forever]. If every American would read it, they would no longer ask why and how all this has happened.

There is no doubt, if one will only look and learn. We are fighting a religious war. It is Judaism against Christianity. We have had a revival of ancient Rabbinism and it will be a surprise to many who truly love our Lord Jesus Christ to learn that the present teaching of the Kingdom of God is identical with first century Rabbinism. This is no accident. It has been carefully planned by the enemies of Jesus, and fed gradually to the people, until today, most of our churches are promoting Judaism in the name of Christianity.

Although the church denominations in the past have had differences of opinion on some doctrines, they ALL agreed that the true Kingdom of God is here on the Earth, and has been established in the New Jerusalem, the United States of America. It has only been in the last one hundred years or so, that the teaching of a still future, Kingdom of God has spread throughout the land, causing great confusion. It will help to know the true and the false teachings of the kingdom.

History - Part 26

    If you should read Spiritual Communism and The Union Jack, then you would understand that that the Pharisaic hypocrisy is not at its peak, with the entire world control by the invisible Pharisee Jew; and that they "stir up the people." (Acts 6:12; 13:50; 14:2; 17:13; 21:27) All over the world in every way possible, even manipulating the wars to whip communism, which they set up as a disguise. While controlling the right wing anti-communists by telling us horrible things about communism to keep us looking in that direction while the so-called "Chosen People" set up their One World Government, a New World Order, through the guise of Christianity.

    All too many, today, believe that the Jews occupy Palestine in fulfillment of prophecy as declared by the Zionists; but all the prophecies relating to the Jews returning to Palestine were made before or during the time of captivity in Babylon, and all fulfilled at their return from Babylonia captivity. They occupy Palestine today in fulfillment of what Jesus said to them in John 8:44; that they would do the works of their father, the devil -- NOT in fulfillment of prophecy that has already been fulfilled.

    If you are interested in how the so-called Holy Land became transformed into a Zionist state, we present you the following information. There are three causes:

    1). False Zionist territorial claim to Palestine.

    2). The Balfour Declaration.

    3). The United Nations Participation Act.

    The Zionist Jews that control the British Empire and the United States are the framework of the plot. The Scofield Bible has been used to mislead Christians into believing that the earthly throne of David will be under the control of the Jews.

No Covenant Between Jews and God

    In "Issues," the quarterly periodical of the American Council for Judaism, Vol. 12, No. 8, we find on pages 12-14: "Kaplan emphasizes the existence of a Jewish people but denies their superiority. He contends that Jews cannot prove the existence of any specific covenant between them and God. Jews are neither superior human beings, nor do they possess a superior tradition because of the Torah [Talmud], according to Kaplan. He implies that other religious civilizations offer traditions equally good. He also rejects the inference that Jewish chosenness consists of heightened ethical responsibility.

    Berger rejects the existence of a Jew people...He says: I find nothing to support the thesis that there is such an entity as a Jewish people except in the sense that among all Jews there are certain similarities of religious belief and practice.

    Berger argues that the people believing in the God of Moses constituted a religious community, not a nationality. Moses was the prime example for this point, since he had married a Medianite rather than a Hebrew girl [Berger does not understand that Moses' wife 'WAS' an Israelite Woman]. Berger rejects the divine origin of this early monotheistic belief thus making it possible for him to refute by definition that divine decree made of the Jews a distance people." (Mordecai M. Kaplan, Author of "Judaism as a Civilization"; Rabbi Elmer Berger, Executive Director of the American Council for Judaism).

    Following is a quote from The Union Jack, p. 93: "The Jew, in a fleshy racial sense does not exist and never has from Old Testament times until the second appearance of Christ, at the final age of Gospel. The only true application of Jew should be Pharisee, based on the belief of Rabbinism or Talmudism. Therefore, our use of Jew refers to a religious sect, based on Luciferianism."

Communism is Jewish

 What do George Bush, Helmut Kohl, John Major, most Western leaders, Mikhail Gorbachev, Boris Yeltsin, and Eduard Shevardnaze all have in common? They are all socialists, secular humanists and globalists, working for a common socialist global government, called by Bush and Gorbachev "The New World Order."

    A few years ago the "convergence theory" of history emerged. It held that America and the West would move to the political left, the Soviets would move to the political right, and we would all meet and merge in the middle as socialists or Social Democrats. The "covergence theory" of history seems to be right on track. Socialist Russia, socialist Eastern Europe and socialist Western Europe are all moving toward merging into one giant unitary state or federation over the next five years or so. It is believed by many that A massive Soviet subversion and absorption of Western Europe will follow.

Reorganizing the USSR From Top to Bottom

    Soviet leaders in the Central Committee, the Politburo, the KGB and the Soviet Academy of Sciences began to conclude over a decade ago that in spite of the USSR's vast natural and human resources, that the country was utilizing those resources in a most "barbaric manner."

    They have concluded over the past decade that Soviet industry is lagging badly behind the West, especially in controlling wastefulness of materials and energy, as well as human resources. Soviet industry uses two to two-and-a-half times more material resources and one to one-and-a-half times more energy per unit of production than Western countries do. Gorbachev and the Soviet leaders have therefore called for the reorganization of Soviet society from top to bottom, but within the framework of socialism.

    The "new economic policy" is called "free market" and borrows much terminology from the West, but to Gorbachev and the Soviet leadership, "free market" means state and collectively owned property, businesses still state-run and state-controlled, business or investment profits are still illegal, etc. To the Soviets, "free market" means only that they will trade with us, while to Westerners, when the Soviets use the term, they think the USSR is in a transition to capitalism.

    Another example of word/concept manipulation is "liberation theology." The Soviets hatched "liberation theology" about 15 years ago, which is a diabolical and seductive use of Marxist-Leninist doctrine wrapped up in Christian/Biblical terminology, doctrines, etc. Liberation theology has been a smashing success for the Communists in Central and Latin America, South Africa, and the Philippines. Now they are taking Marxist and socialist concepts and wrapping them up in free market terminology, concepts, etc., to seduce gullible Western political and business leaders.

    When Gorbachev talks about stagnation, electronization of industry, opening the country to market economy, democratization of society, etc., he is really talking about getting rid of the corrupt, overpaid, inefficient bureaucrats who are now running the Soviet Union instead of the workers. The bloated bureaucracy is about to be cut away, "because it has lost its revolutionary fervor."

    As Gorbachev said at the XXVth CPSU Congress: "What we see today is not the working class running the Soviet Union, but the bureaucracy, which is satisfied to occupy soft and lucrative positions, but is hardly interested in revolutionary movements, political undermining of the rest of the world, or military expansion of Communism. This is clearly stagnation.'

The New Soviet Approach--The Velvet Glove vs. The Ironclad Fist

    Since 1917, the Communists have hated nationalism and nationalists, who stand for strong national entities as opposed to the international order sought by the Communists. According to the Socialist/Communist ideology, nationalism hinders the development of socialism and eventually Communism, and is counter-internationalist. From the '60s to the '80s, nationalists in the Baltic States, Byelorussia and Ukraine have been under incessant attack by the Communists.

    However, with glasnost-perestroika, the situation seemingly changed. National symbols such as flags and other objects were suddenly allowed. Literally overnight, people turned to the old national emblems, parading them in front of the Communists as if they had won the battle for national survival. The nationalists in the Baltics and other republics exposed themselves and left no doubt as to who they were. This bringing potential enemies to the surface was probably the main goal of the CPSU. Over the past few years, the Soviets have allowed nationalist opposition to emerge, and have then turned around and infiltrated it, financed it, and co-opted [or taken over] much of it.

    The Soviets are masters at either creating or taking over their own opposition. They did this with Solidarity in Poland, the New Salvation Front in Romania, and with Shevardnadze and Yeltsin in the USSR. Much more advantageous than destroying their opposition is to create or co-opt it so they can use it for their own purposes.

    We hear a great deal about the "hardliners" versus the "reformers," or the "conservatives" versus the "liberals." Western leaders, like Bush, and the Western media describe the "hardliners" [or "conservatives"] as unrepentant Communist hawks, [i.e., such as the "gang of eight"]; and the "reformers" [or "liberals"] as lovers of freedom, democracy and free markets [such as Gorbachev, Shevardnaze and Yeltsin]. In reality, both groups are hard-core Marxist-Leninist Communists, hell-bent on Soviet world domination or conquest. They simply disagree on the most advantageous method for our destruction.

    The "hardliners" would bludgeon us to death with an ironclad fist; the "reformers" would strangle us with a velvet glove. The result is the same, our destruction. The quarrel between the so-called "conservatives" and "liberals" is over methodology, not results or the final outcome. The reformers believe you can catch more flies with honey than vinegar. Gorbachev is widely viewed and described as a reformer, a liberal, and a lover of democracy. And yet, in December '89, he said: "I am a Communist, a convinced Communist. For some that may be a fantasy. But for me, it is my main goal."

    In November '87, Gorbachev said: "In our work and worries, we are motivated by those Leninist ideals and noble endeavors and goals which mobilized the workers of Russia seven decades ago to fight for the new and happy world of socialism. Perestroika is a continuation of the October Revolution."

    That same Gorbachev, described to the West as a lover of democracy and freedom, said in November '87: "We are moving toward a new world, the world of Communism. We shall never turn off that road."

    And in June '90, Gorbachev, "the reformer," said: "I am now, just as I've always been, a convinced Communist. It's useless to deny the enormous and unique contribution of Marx, Engels and Lenin to the history of social thought and to modern civilization as a whole."

    Gorbachev, Shevardnaze, Yeltsin, and the reform wing of the CPSU are dedicated Communists, they hate the American and other Western "imperialists," and they still believe in the inevitability of the Communist conquest of the world, but they believe a different strategy is presently needed for success. They want to discard the old "hardline" strategy of confrontation, divide and conquer, making enemies, etc., and instead adopt a strategy of cooperation, of embracing the West, making the West friendly to the socialist world, and eventually they intend [through subtlety, deception, infiltration, subversion, and manipulation] to "absorb" the West. Western Europe will be the first to be so absorbed.

    And if that doesn't work Dimitri Manuilski, professor at the Lenin School of Political Warfare, under whom Gorbachev trained, said over fifty years ago: "War to the hilt between Communism and Capitalism is inevitable. Today of course we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come...to win we shall need the element of surprise. The Western World will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular Peace Movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries stupid and decadent will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down WE WILL SMASH THEM WITH OUR CLENCHED FIST."

    Every word of this is being fulfilled before our very eyes. Sure the Soviets will appear to make concessions, abandon the old East European dictators and call for peace, but when the foolish Israel nations of the Western world are disarmed and defenseless, they will attack in an attempt to destroy us.

    The "reformers" want to incorporate their "new thinking" into the world thinking process in order to ultimately control world politics. They want the economy of the world to be integrated with the economy of the Soviet Union. They plan to take over the world the way the AIDS virus takes over the body, slowly, subtly, surreptitiously. It is important for the West to understand that Gorbachev, Shevardnaze and Yeltsin [the "reformers"] are just as dangerous enemies to our survival as the "gang of eight" [the "hardliners"].

    In fact, these reformers are more dangerous because they have caused the West to lower its threat perception, to lower its guard. Better the enemy you can see and defend against than the enemy who comes to you as a friend, as Brutus did to Julius Caesar before he stabbed him.

    The "reformers" will tell us what we want to hear, they will talk about democracy, free elections, free markets, multi-party systems, freedom, independence, etc., while giving these words their own Marxist-Leninist twist or meaning. If you are strangled by the hand in the velvet glove, instead of being bludgeoned by the ironclad fist, you are still just as dead!

The New Soviet Federation

    We are being told that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics [USSR] is collapsing. That is not really true. It is being voluntarily disbanded by the Soviet leadership in favor of a new federation [or union] to be called the Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics. this restructuring [not disintegration as it is portrayed by Soviet disinformation and the Western media] of the USSR [the Evil Empire] has been on the drawing boards since before Gorbachev came to power [actually dating back to the late '70s.

    The leaders of the Soviet Union at that time began to realize that the present form of the Soviet Empire was archaic, inefficient, and ecounter-productive to further global expansion, except in remote areas of the world [i.e. Africa, Nicaragua] not contiguous to the USSR.

    In a certain sense, the Western policy of "containment" and the advent of NATO in the '50s had been reasonably successful in restricting the USSR's European growth beyond Eastern Europe and the soviet republics. Just as slavery in the old American south had become unprofitable, not productive and uneconomical before the U.S. Civil War, so the Soviet Empire was seen over a decade ago to need deep reform in its imperial structure.

The Rebirth of Imperial Russia

    For the past nearly two thousand years there has been a conflict that has embroiled not only the two major participants but the entire world. When the early Christians began telling everyone that the Savior had already come and that we must rid ourselves of Phariseeism [later Talmudism, and even later Judaism], the Jews began their unending contest to regain the birthright their father Easu had sold to Jacob-Israel. They would shout to anyone who would listen that Christian Israelites were: "These that have turned the world upside down are come hither also." (Acts 17:6)

History - Part 27

    Jesus told them in a parable straight-out, "Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." (Matthew 21:43) If anyone might question the final outcome of this battle of two millenniums, the next verse in Matthew 21:44 should suffice. "And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder."

    The battle began and it has never let up. At first, the antichrists were on top and the Bible tells only a very small number of things they did. But Christianity continued to grow and influence the entire world in morals and customs. The anti-christs penetrated the early Universal Church with very clever heresies which came from the minds of the masters of intrigue. The Universal Church decayed into the Popish Church because of it.

    Martin Luther tried to reform it but the Protestant Reformation has penetrated even more deeply than the earlier Universal Church. Christians would fight back with all the means at their disposal, with only limited effect.

    Finally, the inquisitions were ordered. This had only a limited, short term effect. the mistake was made to allow the antichrists to be baptized and become "Christians." Thus, now they could continue their efforts to destroy Christianity from within. Many took positions of leadership within the church. Until finally they took absolute control in the 19th century. Contrary to what is taught in the modern seminaries and contrary to the current array of laws designed to show the antichrists as the winner, the fight still rages.

    Proceeding now to more modern times, the question is often raised to determine the role that greater Russia has played in this battle of the ages. It has been by sheer predestination that the people of Eastern Europe and Russia have brought the battle to the struggle we see today. We will attempt to shed some new light on current affairs in that respect.

    The examples given are by no means the most important that have occurred in recent years, however, they are current and perhaps, through that, you can better understand the conspiracy that still exists. By now most Christians must be wondering what all of the activity in Russia portends for the future. We have attempted to show you previously and will continue to attempt to show you further own in this presentation. It is an attempt to lead you through the maze of the multitude of analyses that are being published, in such number as to stagger the mind.

    However, there are some observations that we can make that should give some insight as to how current affairs fit together in the continuation of that great battle, between Christianity and Satan and his children. Some of these observations are a little humorous [if it weren't so deadly serious] and are somewhat analogous to the "rats leaving the sinking ship!"

    By now, every person in the United States should [but doesn't] realize that the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 was funded by Wall Street and the Jewish International Bankers. The conduct of the revolution was carried out by a predominantly Jewish group of approximately 300 well trained revolutionaries. Communism, the 1905 and 1917 Bolshevik Revolutions and the USSR came from the minds of Talmudic Jewry. The September 10th, 1920 issue of the American Hebrew, says it all: "The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thinks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world."

    It is recognized that the Communist dream in Russia backfired on the perpetrators. Stalin's purge eliminated many of the original leaders, along with their followers. However, the entire government of the USSR was manipulated from within by the same Talmudic forces. The military was required to have a political commissar in each division who was Jewish. The KGB was staffed almost entirely with Jewish agents.

    However, as the world, and particularly the people of Russia, saw the utter futility of the Talmudic Communist dream, the Jews of the world started to distance themselves from the ideals of the Soviet Union and from world Communism, at least on the surface. We are now witnessing what is being presented to the world as the dissolution of the Communist structure, at least in Russia proper. We are also observing all sorts of "slight-of-hand" tricks to remove Talmudic Jewry and Zionism from Communism. For example, when the recent coup was presented to us, the controlled media here in the United States blatantly lied as to who the perpetrators were. Instead of informing the public that the leaders of the coup were hardline Communist leaders [which all of know is defined as extreme left-wing], they repeatedly told us that they were radical conservatives of the extreme right-wing!

    This sort of intellectual dishonesty has been growing for some time now. It has already been shown that Talmudic Jewry is very Socialistic in nature. The United States Congress conducted many investigations into Communistic influence in our country in the '40s, '50s and early '60s. However, any Congressman, who spoke out on this obvious connection was immediately labeled as anti-Semitic. Men like Joseph McCarthy were driven to their graves with vitriolic epithets such as "McCarthyism."

    As the Jewish love affair with Communism waned in the late '60s and '70s, their political affiliations also changed. For many years, the description of "right-wing" and "left-wing" used the ordinary circle in its definition. The centrist position was at the top of the circle and as a person became more "right-wing" he would move clockwise around the circle until he reached the bottom of the circle, at which time he became known as a Nazi or a National Socialist. If he moved counter-clockwise around the circle he became more "left-wing" until he would reach the bottom of the circle and he would then become known as a Communist. Both the extreme right-wing and the extreme left-wing joined at the bottom of the circle. At least, this was the case by definition.

    A mass exodus was taking place all over the world from Communism by Talmudic Jewry. Many of them left the "left-wing" or Socialist-Communist persuasion and became "neo-conservatives" but they did it with a particular flair. They retained many of their Socialist views but joined the so-called Republican party and brought into it the totalitarianism of the old Federalists.

    Consequently, greatly because of them, the old circle description of "left" and "right" had to be replaced. It was replaced in political science circles with what is called the Nolan Chart. The definitions are changed. A graph is formed with the ordinate or y axis reflecting social freedoms and is measured from 0 to 100%. This is called "left-wing." The abscissa or x axis represents the economic freedoms and is likewise measured from 0 to 100%. This is called "right-wing."

    Those who not many years ago were classified as Communists, can now fight for "social freedoms" such as homosexuality, pre-marital sex, sex education [Kindergarten through 12th grade], women's liberation, liberalization of drug use, total pluralism, freedom from Christian principles, etc. At the same time, they can have the economic freedoms of the free enterprise system guaranteed by the Christian principles. The only problem is that they won't heed the limitations of economic freedoms placed on them by the same Christian principles.

    The first response to this dichotomy is that they have given up Communism. No, they haven't given up Communism. They have gained the social freedoms that they couldn't have even in the Soviet Union and at the same time have unlimited economic freedoms, far exceeding the limits of Christian principles.

    Returning to the Russian scene. During the recent coup attempt, three young men were killed in the heat of the confrontation. One of the young men was Jewish and the other two were non-Jewish. The Russian people considered them all to be martyrs and a much publicized public service was held for them. The visibility of Russian Orthodox priests was very evident. This appears to mean that the Christian Church is once again being recognized. In fact, it is very obvious that the Christian Church is in the forefront of the massive changes being seen in Russia. Whether its being orchestrated by the KGB or the Communist Central Committee remains to be seen.

    At the public service a Rabbi was also allowed to conduct his service for the young Jewish man who was killed. It is significant that this young Jewish man had recently been given his immigration visa to go to Israel.

    What has been the response to these actions within the leadership of the American Jewish community? This can best be described by excerpting from an article found in the Religious News Service for August 30, 1991. The article was written by Rabbi James Rudin who is the director of the American Jewish Committee's interreligious affairs and is a founder of the National Interreligious Task Force on Soviet Jewry.

    After citing the incident described above he says, "For nearly 75 year the Soviet Union has officially been an atheistic state, and for many of those years, the Communist rulers carried out an aggressive campaign that prohibited parents from giving spiritual instruction to their children, closed seminaries, persecuted believers and suppressed the publication and distribution of prayer books, Bibles and other articles of religious expression. Soviet Jews, Ukrainian Roman Catholics and Pentecostal Christians were special targets of the Communist authorities.

    The Soviet regime often sponsored acts of anti-Semitism, and Jewish activists like Natan Scharansky were falsely imprisoned for many years. Many Jews who sought visas to leave the Soviet Union were kept waiting for years, and a new word, 'refusnik,' entered our vocabulary.

    For over 20 years, the struggle to bring freedom to Soviet Jewry has been one of the world's major human rights efforts. In this country Jews and Christians worked together in a remarkable interreligious effort that helped keep the Soviet Jewry movement alive, even in its darkest days.

    At the same time that Jews were leaving in record numbers, the old Soviet anti-religion policy was weakened, and then finally abandoned. Religious faith, the first target of every totalitarian regime, has emerged with renewed vigor and credibility. Although the recent public funeral in Moscow was a sad occasion, it was also a symbolic confirmation of the failure of the atheistic Soviet state.

    But with this sense of confirmation must also come a sense of caution. During Tsarist rule in Russia, religious faith, especially that of the Russian Orthodox Church, was often source of extreme nationalism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism. The intense entanglement of the church and the regime usually resulted in political corruption and moral decadence. In the popular mind, this likage is personified by Gregor Rasputin, an Orthodox priest who wielded enormous political power during the last days of the Romanov dynasty.

    Indeed, the very name, Rasputin, has come to mean the evil influence of religion in the affairs of state. Today we rejoice that religion in the Soviet Union has been freed from the dungeon and has entered into the light of freedom. However, we must remain vigilant. With credibility comes responsibility.

    Just as we pressed our campaign to bring freedom to Jews and Christians who suffered under Communist rule, we must now press with equal commitment our campaign to guarantee that religion within the USSR does not now become an instrument for new prejudice and repression.

    Many positive things have happened in the world of religion since 1917. Hopefully, the hard won principles of religious liberty, individual conscience, minority rights and religious pluralism will also become an integral part of the republics of the USSR. The symbolism and the rabbi and the patriarch drawn together by tragedy was both startling and encouraging."

    This is a typical example of intellectual dishonesty. Let us go over his points one by one. "For nearly 75 years the Soviet Union has officially been an atheistic state...closing seminaries, persecuted believers... suppressed...Soviet Jews, Ukrainian Roman Catholics and Pentecostal Christians..."

    This is now 1999 and 83 years ago was 1916. That was the very time that his own people were creating the revolution and were assisted financially by people of like religious persuasion in the United States. Their intentions from the outset were that Russia would be atheistic. He indicates that Jews, Roman Catholics, and Pentecostal Christians were the targets. Which is a bald face lie the Jews were NEVER targets, it was the Christians who were murdered by the millions by the Jews, not by some other group. No mention is made of the Russian Orthodox Church. This is significant.

    The Church Times in London on April 13, 1923 said: "Already twenty-eight bishops and twelve hundred priests of the Russian Holy Orthodox Church have been sacrificed to the Bolshevik [Jewish] hatred of the Christian Faith. "Many Jews who sought visas to leave the Soviet Union were kept waiting for years..."

    The Jews were the ONLY ones who were allowed to leave. Some had to wait because they were employed in sensitive military or government positions and were forced to wait until they could be cleared by the higher Soviet Jewish authorities. "The regime...sponsored...anti-Semitism, and Jewish activists like Natan Scharansky were falsely imprisoned for many years...'refusnik' entered our vocabulary."

    Our history books don't read quite that way. George Bernard Shaw, quoted in The Jewish Guardian of London on August 7, 1931 said: "I have seen the statement which Joseph Stalin gave recently to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency on Anti-Semitism and in which the Soviet leader said that UNDER THE SOVIET LAWS MILITANT ANTI-SEMITISM IS PUNISHABLE BY DEATH."

    Also, Kurt Blumenfeld stated in The Jewish Frontier (New York), January 1942, "Up to 50% of the Jews in the Soviet Union are engaged as officials, clerks and in the intellectual profession. In the totalitarian Communist system the Jew, instead of being engaged in trade and business, has been the official, the employee of the State."

    Rabbi Rudin makes no mention that the Jews officiated in the Soviet regime. "During Tsarist rule in Russia...the Russian Orthodox Church was often a source of extreme nationalism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism...resulted in political corruption and moral decadence...this linkage is personified by Gregor Rasputin, an Orthodox priest who wielded enormous political power during the last days of the Romanov dynasty...Rasputin, has come to mean the evil influence of religion in the affairs of state."

    Grigory Yefimovich Rasputin was born in 1872 and died December 30, 1916 in St. Petersburg. He was a Siberian peasant and mystic whose ability to improve the condition of Alexis Nikolayevich, the hemophiliac heir to the Russian throne, made him a powerful favorite in the court of Emperor Nicholas II and Empress Alexandra. After a two year study at Mt. Athos in Greece, he returned to Russia and soon became widely known for his healing arts.

History - Part 28

    He was in no way a Russian Orthodox Priest. The high society of St. Petersburg warmly received the filthy, unkept peasant with brilliant eyes and extraordinary healing talents. He was recommended by high church officials to the imperial family in 1905 because of his ability to heal illness.

    When he demonstrated an ability to ease the suffering of the young Alexis, he was welcomed into the family circle as a close and trusted friend, and Alexandra came to revere him as a holy man sent by God to save her son, the Romanov dynasty, and the Russian autocracy.

    When Emperor Nicholas II went off to take command of the army during World War I, the Empress Alexandra acquired greater control of the domestic affairs. Rasputin moved in and replaced capable officials with unscrupulous men who made decisions adverse to the best interests of the Christian Tzars and to Russia. It is possible that these men were but forerunners of the 1917 revolution. The friends of the aristocracy attempted to kill him by poison which didn't work and then by shooting him twice which also didn't work. Finally they succeeded by drowning him in the Neva River by throwing him in a hole in the ice covered river.

    It is true that Rasputin was a very base and course individual with unclean and immoral habits. But he was in no way a Russian Orthodox Priest and he certainly did not represent the "intense entanglement of the church and the regime (which) usually resulted in Political corruption and moral decadence."

    Rabbi Rudin stated, "Just as we pressed our campaign to bring freedom to Jews and Christians who suffered under Communist rule, we must now press with equal commitment our campaign to guarantee that religion within the USSR does not now become an instrument for new prejudice and repression. Many positive things have happened in the world of religion since 1917..." It is certainly true many things have happened in the world or religion since 1917. But they have been anything but positive.

    Since 1917, Christianity has been changed into Judeo-Christianity. The term was never heard of 75 years ago. Judeo-Christianity with its pluralism is now ordaining homosexuals and women. The greatest debates now going on in official church councils relate to the values of pre-marital sex and extra-marital sexual relationships.

    It is common knowledge that the so-called Christian book publishers are owned by non-Christians. The seminaries use Jewish Rabbis as teachers of the Bible. There are very few individual Christian Churches where the evils of our society and government are addressed. The people are staying home, just like they did in Russia, and are receiving their guidance from those government approved preachers on television and radio.

    Dr. Samuel Max Malamed, himself a Jew and an authority on the origin of Communism, stated as editor of The Reflex, published in New York, in the November 1927 issue, Vol. 1, No. 5, on page 7, the following: "The Russian Jew is often accused of being responsible for the rise of Bolshevism and for the continuation of the Bolshevist regime. This accusation is founded on fact that so many Jews were to be found in the offices of the Soviet government in the first years of the revolution, and that their number was out of proportion to the Jews in Russia. This fact cannot be denied."

    Clare Sheridan, the well-known journalist and student of the origin of Communism, stated in The New York World, in an exhaustive analysis of the origin of Communism, on December 13, 1920, on page 13, the following: "The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every Government office, in every bureau, in every newspaper office."

    Sir Winston Churchill (who was himself a half Jew), as familiar as any person in the world with the origin of Communism, was the author of an article on that subject published in London, in Illustrated Sunday Herald of February 8, 1920, on page 5 which among other things included this observation: "The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship or excepted by the Bolshevists from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with villainies which are now being perpetrated."

    The British Guardian of London, recognized throughout the world as a highly dependable source of information on the origin of Communism, on March 13, 1925, published in Vol, 6, No. 10, on page 73, the following: "...The majority of the most influential Bolshevist leaders are Jews."

    Henry C. Emery, in his analysis of the origin of Communism, published in The Yale Review of New Haven, stated July 1919, in Vol. 8, No. 4 on page 676 of that scholarly study, the following: "In the minds of some people, especially in Russia, Bolshevism takes on the color of a revolt of the Jews against Russians..."

    David Lloyd George, the British Prime Minister at the time of the overthrow of the Russian Government by the Communist revolution in 1917, is quoted in The World At the Crossroads, published in 1921 in Boston, by its Russian author Boris Leo Brazol, as having stated: "...The Jews of Russia wielded considerable influence in Bolshevik circles."

    The Communist publication Kommunist of Kharkov, Russia, in its April 12, 1919 issue reported the following concerning the origin of Communism, according to The World Hoax, published in Asheville, North Carolina in 1938 by Ernest F. Elmhurst: "Without exaggeration, it may be said that the great Russian Revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of the Jews."

    George Pitt-Rivers in his classic, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution, published in 1920 at Oxford, observed the following concerning the origin of Communism: "...Jewry, as a whole, strove every nerve to secure and heartily approved of the overthrow of the Russian monarchy, which they regarded as their most formidable obstacle in the path of their own ambitions..."

    Rabbi Judah Leon Magnes, whose understanding of the origin of Communism commanded the respect of his co- religionists as an expert on the subject, stated in The Jewish Forum on February 1919, published in New York, on page 722, this observation on the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917: "The revolution in Russia set free creative forces -- and look what a large company of Jews were available for immediate service."

    Harry Waton, himself a Jew and a recognized authority on the question of the origin of Communism, is quoted by others as having stated in his book, A Program For The Jews and Humanity, published in 1939 in New York, on pages 143-144 the following: "...In the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism..."

    The Jewish World, of London in its August 18, 1922 issue, is quoted by Colin Jordan in his Fraudulent Conversion, published in London in 1955, as having published the following: "Business is gaining in Russia, and with the new regime Jews are promptly becoming the captains of industry."

    Robert Wilton in his history of the origin of Communism, The Last Days of the Romanovs, published in 1920 in New York, reveals the illuminating fact on page 391 as follows: "Taken according to the numbers of population, the Jews represented one in ten; among the commissars that rule Bolshevist Russia they are nine in ten, if anything, the proportion of Jews is still higher."

    William Jocobus Oudendijk, Netherlands Minister in Petrograd during the Bolshevik revolution, in his excellent explanation of the origin of Communism, Ways and By-Ways in Diplomacy, published in London in 1939 states on page 246: "Those who were not for the Bolsheviks were not allowed to be against them; they were to be exterminated."

    The eminent Professor Charles Sarolea, of the University of Edinburgh, in his analysis of the origin of Communism, Impressions of the Soviet Russia, published in 1924 in London, on page 159 states as follows: "That the Jews have played a leading part in the Bolshevist upheaval and are still playing a leading part in the Bolshevist Government is a proposition which no one will deny who has taken the trouble to study Russian affairs at first hand."

    Before the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate, in Washington, D.C. in 1920, dealing with Bolshevik Propaganda, Colonel V.S. Hurban, Military Attache of the Czechoslovak Legation in Washington, D.C., in sworn testimony testified to the following: "Perhaps I choose a very difficult question when I speak of the role of the Jews in the Russian revolution...I can not deny it, because it is a fact, and it is useless to deny it, that in the Soviets from the beginning there have been a very large percentage of Jews. It cannot be denied."

    In an exhaustive study on the Origin of Communism published by Small, Maynard & Co. of Boston, Mass. in 1920, under the title The Protocols and World Revolution, not to be confused with the book of a similar name, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, The Morning Post of London is quoted as having published on April 9, 1991 the following: "These Jews are at the present time in control of the Russian Government and they have powerful friends in all the Allied countries who are helping them."

    DeWitt Clinton Poole, Jr., the head of the Division of Russian Affairs in the Department of State in Washington, D.C., prepared a "confidential" memorandum for the Secretary of State, on October 28, 1921, which contained the following statement: "One of the American prisoners who recently returned from Russia made the following comment upon the position of Jews in Russia: (1) though he saw many Commissars, he saw none who was not a Jew; (2) he was tried by seven judges, all of whom were Jews."

    The New York Times on February 17, 1938, on page 5, quoted Giornale d' Italia of Rome, which published that Feodor Budenko, Charge d'Affairs of the Soviet Legation in Bucharest, Rumania, after severing all connections with Bolshevism and fleeing to Rome, stated the following: "Jews who have replaced pre-Bolshevist capitalists and who virtually control big industry now have a monopoly of production and live lives of luxury."

    The Morning Post of London on August 30, 1919 again quoted by Small, Maynard & Co. of Boston, Mass., in 1920, as above mentioned, published the following: "It is unfortunately true that Bolshevism is very largely a Jewish movement. In Russia the Jewish Bolsheviks have taken a terrible revenge upon all whom they regarded as enemies..."

    Sefton Delmer, in The Daily Express of London on January 29, 1953, is quoted in Fraudulent Conversion published in London in 1955, by Colin Jordan, as having stated: "When I last visited Russia in 1947 I found Jews in key positions everywhere. I found them in the Foreign Office, in factories, in the secret police, and in universities. Not only in Moscow and in Leningrad either, but in provincial Stalingrad."

    Angelo S. Rappoport, himself a Jew and the author of a revealing classic on the origin of Communism, Pioneers of the Russian Revolution, published in 1918 in London, in referring to the extent of their authority throughout Russia, states on page 250 as follows: "There was no political organization in the vast empire that was not influenced by Jews or directed by them."

    Reverend Denis Fahey in his comprehensive exposure of the origin of Communism, The Rulers Of Russia, published in Dublin, Ireland in 1939, quotes J. Fontenoy of Geneva, Switzerland, in his Counter-Revolution published in 1937, in which the following appears: "On my arrival in USSR in 1934, I remember I was struck by the enormous proportion of Jewish functionaries everywhere. In the Press, and diplomatic circles, it was difficult to find non-Jews."

    Lt. Col. P.R. Malone, a Pro-Bolshevik Member of Parliament and married to a Jewess, in the official publication, Parliamentary Debates, reported in Great Britain's House of commons, in Vol. 120, November 5, 1919, in column 945, is reported to have stated: "It is said openly that the Soviet Government is a Government of the Jews...Of course there are Jews in control of Russia. There are Jews behind the Commissars."

    The illustrious Hilaire Belloc is quoted by Reverend Denis Fahey, in his Rulers Of Russia, as having stated in London publication, G.K.'s Weekly, in its February 4, 1937 issue, the following: "As far anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary Bolshevist movement is Jewish in Russia, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppressions of our deplorable press."

    The eminent Robert Vaucher, an authority on the first revolution in 1905 and the second revolution in 1917, by Bolsheviks in Russia, in an article in L'illustration, published in Paris, in its September 14, 1918 issue, concerning the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, on page 259 states as follows: "The more one studies the second revolution, the more he is convinced that Bolshevism is a Jewish movement..."

    The Jewish Voice published in New York, in Vol. 2, No. 1 of January 1942, contained Joseph Stalin's statement on Anti-Semitism, given by Stalin to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency on January 12, 1931, expounding upon Stalin's stand against anti-Semitism as follows: "In the USSR anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon profoundly hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the USSR active anti-Semites are punished with death."

    Moissaye J. Olgin, himself a Jew, in his study on the origin of Communism, published in the magazine Asia, in December 1917, page 780, describes how Lenin disposed of those who opposed Communism thus: "Lenin does not reply to an opponent; he vivisects him."

    The Times of London, on March 29, 1919 on page 10, offers evidence that Lenin was the hatchet-man of the Bolshevist movement under the direction of commissar Jews in control of the Bolshevik revolution as follows: "If Lenin is the brains of the movement, the Jews provide the executive officers. Of the leading commissars, Trotsky, Zinovieff, Kameneff, Stekloff, Sverdloff, Uritsky, Joffe, Rekovsky, Radek, Menjinsky, Larin, Bronski, Zaalkind, Volodarsky, Petroff, Litvinoff, Smidovitch, and Vorosky are all of them of the Jewish race, while amongst the minor Soviet officials the number is legion."

    Robert Wilton, in his celebrated history of the origin of Communism, The Last Days of the Romanovs, published in 1920 in New York, recounts the murder of the Czar, on pages 392-393 as follows: "...The Jews were not Russians and to them the destruction of Russia was all in the way of business, revolutionary or financial. The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Czar deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov...and carried out by the Jews, Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yurovsky, is an act not of the Russian people but of this hostile invader."

    Eric D. Butler of Adelaide, Australia in 1946 published his book, The International Jew, not to be confused with another book of a similar name, in which Jacob H. Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Company, in New York, predicts the second revolution in Russia, on pages 60-61, as follows: "Russia eventually accepted the mediation of America in connection with this reign of terror [the 1905 first Bolshevik revolution in Russia], and Count Witte was the Russian representative. Now, as Count Witte was married to a Jewess, he could hardly be termed 'anti-Semitic.' Jacob Schiff attended in person with the official American representative. At this conference of mediation, and made it quite clear that the cause of the internal trouble in Russia was the status of his fellow Jews. Count Witte tried to point out that most of the reports about the treatment of Jews in Russia were rather exaggerated, whereupon Schiff said, 'If the Czar will not accord our people these desired liberties, then a revolution will bring about a republic which will assure us our rights.'"

History - Part 30

    That tyranny is kept in existence by the same means by which it was set up. In Red Dusk and the Morrow, p. 303, by Sir Paul Dukes, formerly Chief of the British Secret Service in Russia, we read that a Lithuanian asked a prominent Bolshevik how the regime was maintained. The answer was: "Our power is based on three things: first, on Jewish brains; secondly, on Lettish and Chinese bayonets; and thirdly, on the crass stupidity of the Russian people."

    Lenin wrote: "We deny all morality in the bourgeois sense, for according to the bourgeois, morality has its origin in the Commandments of God...our morality, on the contrary, is entirely subordinate to the interests of the proletariat."

    Mr. Hilaire Belloc wrote in G.K.'s Weekly, February 4, 1937: "As for anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary Bolshevist movement is Jewish in Russia, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppressions of our deplorable Press."

    Mr. Oudendyke, the representative of the Netherlands Government at St. Petersburg, when the Bolshevists began their reign of terror. Mr. Balfour received the report via Christiania on September 18, 1918. It was published as a British White Paper in April, 1919, and was entitled "Russia, No 1 (1919), A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. The following is extracted from Mr. Oudendyke's Report: "The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other Governments to the fact that, if an end is not put to Bolshevism at once, the civilization of the whole world is threatened. This is not an exaggeration, but a somber matter of fact...I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. The only manner in which this danger can be averted would be collective action on the part of all the Powers."

    In addition to the information about the Jewish Banking Houses which financed the Russian Revolution, the document also gives the long list of Jews who took over the direction of the Russian people in 1917. Lenin is given as a Russian, but all the other twenty-four given on the list -- Trotsky, Zinovieff, Kameneff, Parvus, etc. are stated to be Jews.

    In Appendix B, of All These Things, by A.N. Field, quotes from Vol. III of United States Senate Document No. 62, 66th Congress, First Session, some extracts from the evidence of Rev. George A. Simons, Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Petrograd from 1907 to October 6th, 1918, before a Committee of the United States Senate on February 12, 1919. The Rev. Mr. Simons stated with regard to the Bolshevik Government in Petrograd: "In December, 1918...under the presidency of a man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff)...out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, and all the rest Jews, with the exception of one man who is a negro from North America...and 265 of these Jews belonging to this Northern Commune government that is sitting in the old Smolny Institute come from the Lower East Side of New York, 265 of them."

    Mr. Field also remarked in Appendix B of his book, All These Things: "Lenin was married to a Jewess, spoke Yiddish in his family circle, and Dr. Chaim Weizmann, Jewish Zionist leader, was quoted in the London Jewish Chronicle of December 16, 1932, as saying that Lenin had taken part in Jewish student meetings in Switzerland thirty-five years before. He is generally regarded as a Russian, but there is doubt."

    In her book, From Liberty to Brest-Litovsk, MacMillan, 1919, the Russian lady, Ariadna Tyrkova-Williams, widow of the late Dr. Harold Williams, a longtime Manchester Guardian correspondent in Russia, describes the events of the first year of the Russian Revolution.

    Mrs. Williams was a member of the last Duma and speaks with the authority of an eye-witness and close observer. On pages 297-299 of her work: "There are few Russians among the Bolshevist wire-pullers, i.e., few men imbued with the all-Russian culture and interests of the Russian people. None of them have in any way been prominent in any stage of former Russian life...Besides obvious foreigners, Bolshevism recruited many adherents from among emigres, who had spent many years abroad. Some of them had never been to Russia before. They especially numbered a great many Jews. They spoke Russian badly. The nation over which they had seized power was a stranger to them, and besides, they behaved as invaders in a conquered country. Throughout the Revolution generally and Bolshevism in particular, the Jews occupied a very influential position. This phenomenon is both curious and complex. But the fact remains that such was the case in the primarily elected Soviet (the famous trio Lieber, Dahn, Gotz), and all the more so in the second one.

    In the Soviet Republic all the committees and commissaries were filled with Jews. They often changed their Jewish names for a Russian one -- Trotsky (Bronstein), Kameneff (Rozenfeld), Zinovieff (Apfelbaum), Stekloff (Nakhamkes), and so on. But such a masquerade deceived no one, while the very pseudonyms of the commissaries only emphasized the international or rather the alien character of Bolshevist rule...But, of course, there were also Russians among the Bolsheviks-workmen, soldiers, peasants. Oulianoff-Lenin is a Russian. Lunacharsky, Bonch-Bruevich, Mme. Colontai, Chicherin, all these influential Bolshevist leaders are Russian by origin. But that predominant class which very rapidly crystallized around the Bolsheviks was mainly composed of individuals alien to the Russian people. This fact is probably useful to them to keep control over the masses, for Bolshevist autocracy is founded upon their absolute contempt of the people whom they rule. The most terrible trait of Bolshevism is its utter unscrupulousness as to ways and means, and the blunt cruelty of its leaders."

    The Russian historian, D. Petrovsky, on page 37 of his detailed history of the revolution, La Russie sous les Juifs (Russia under the Jews) says that Lenin (Oulianoff) is one of a number of Russian traitors, yet, on page 86 of the same work, he adds in a note: "Lenin is commonly held to be a Russian, but the natives of Simbirsk are of a different opinion. They relate that a convoy of prisoners traversed Simbirsk a good many years ago. After the departure of the prisoners, a little boy remained behind and was picked up and reared by a gentleman name Oulianoff.

    Years after, a letter came, in ill-formed characters, from the convict settlement, from a certain Ilko Sroul Goldman saying that he had learned, as a result of lengthy inquiries, where his son was. He asked for news of him. This Goldman was said to be Lenin's father. He never again wrote."

    Victor E. Marsden, who was for many years the Morning Post's correspondent in Russia and who was present at the time of the Revolution of 1917, wrote: "...Lenin is a half-blooded Jew, that is to say, the original Ulianov who bore the name of Lenin was so, but there is ground to believe that the present Lenin is impersonating that man who is dead and that the actual Lenin of the Bolshevik business is what he looks, a full-blooded Jew." (Jews in Russia, page 5)

    In the same pamphlet there is a note added to the lists of the names of the 447 Jews out of the 545 officials of the Soviet Bureaucracy. The note says that it is doubtful if Lenin is Russian; that he is Oulianoff by adoption but really a Jew, married to a Jewess and that his children speak Yiddish. Thus though the consensus of opinion is in favor of Lenin's Russian nationality, there is a certain element of doubt.

    From this same pamphlet we read: "The Soviet movement was a Jewish, and not a Russian conception. It was forced on Russian from without, when, in 1917, German and German-American-Jew interests sent Lenin and his associates into Russia, furnished with the wherewithal to bring about the defection of the Russian armies...The Movement has never been controlled by Russians.

    a). Of the 224 revolutionaries who, in 1917, were despatched to Russia with Lenin to foment the Bolshevik Revolution, 170 were Jews.

    b). According to the Times of March, 29, 1919, 'of the 20 or 30 commissaries or leaders who provide the central machinery of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75 percent are Jews...among minor officials the number is legion.'

    According to official information from Russian, in 1920, out of 545 members of the Bolshevist Administration, 447 were Jews. The number of official appointments bestowed upon Jews is entirely out of proportion to their percentage in the State: The population of Soviet Russia is officially given as 158,400,000 the Jewish section, according to the Jewish Encyclopedia, being about 7,800,000. Yet, according to the Jewish Chronicle of January 6, 1933: Over one-third of the Jews in Russia have become officials."

    On pages 93-94 of The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World, a passage is quoted from Impressions of Soviet Russia, by Charles Sarolea, Belgian Consul in Edinburg and Professor of French Literature in the University of Edinburg, in which he says: "I am quite ready to admit that the Jewish leaders are only a proportionately infinitesimal fraction, even as the British rulers of India are an infinitesimal fraction.

    But it is none the less true that those few Jewish leaders are the masters of Russia, even as the fifteen hundred Anglo-Indian Civil Servants are the masters of India. For any traveler in Russia to deny such a truth would be to deny the evidence of his own senses. When you find that out of a large number of important Foreign Office officials whom you have met, all but two are Jews, you are entitled to say that the Jews are running the Russian Foreign Office."

    In the book by A.N. Field, which has already been quoted from, we find, on pages 276-277, the following remarkable statements: "Stalin, present ruler of Russia, is not a Jew, but took as his second wife the twenty-one year old sister of the Jew, L.M. Kagonowitz, his right-hand man, who has been spoken of as his probable or possible successor. Stalin's every movement is made under Jewish eyes."

Central Committee of The Communist Party, 1935

    According to the Defender (Wichita, Kansas) for February, 1936, the Central Committee of the Communist party in Moscow, the very center of International Communism, consisted of 59 members, of whom 56 were Jews, and the other three were married to Jewesses.

    The figures are found in several other journals as well: Non-Jews married to Jewesses (3): L.V. Stalin, S.S. Lobow, V.V. Ossinsky. Jews (56): V.V. Balitsky, K.J. Baumann, I.M. Vareikis, J.B. Gamarnik, I.I. Egoff, I.A. Zelensky, I.D. Kabakoff, L.M. Kaganowitz, V.G. Knorin, M.M. Litvinoff, I.E. Liobimos, D.Z. Manouilsky, I.P. Nossow, J.L. Piatakow, I.O. Piatnitzky, M.O. Aazoumos, M.L. Ruchimovitch, K.V. Rindin, M.M. Houtaevitch, M.S. Tchoudow, A.M. Schvernik, R.I. Eiche, G.G. Iagoda, I.E. Iakir, I.A. Iakovlew, F.P. Griadinsky, G.N. Kaminsky, I.S. Unschlicht, A.S. Boulin, M.I. Kalmanowitz, D.S. Beika, Zifrinovitch, Tratchter, Bitner, G. Kaner, Leo Kirchman, A.K. Lepa, S.A. Lozovsky, B.P. Pozern, T.D. Deribass, K.K. Strevsky, N.N. Popow, G.I. Blagonravow, A.P. Rosengolz, A.P. Serebrovsky, A.M. Steingart, I.P. Bavolunovsky, G.I. Soklonikow, C.I. Broido, V.I. Polonsky, G.D. Veinberg.

    Thus we are faced with the fact that: The Rulers of Russia, are Jews, and they are applying to the world the doctrine of Karl Marx (Mardochai). Marx, according to the Jewish writer, Bernard Lazare, was: "...a clear and lucid Talmudist...full of that old Jewish materialism which ever dreams of a paradise on earth and always rejects the hope held out of the chance of a garden of Eden after Death."

    Yes, it appears that Russia is changing and perhaps going back to the system of the Christian Tzars. Certainly we haven't heard the last of Communism. There are hundreds upon hundreds of millions of Communists still active in the world. It appears, just appears, there just might be a chance that white, Christian Russia is returning to Christianity and old fashioned Imperial Tzarism.

    Remember Lenin's admonition: "We advance through retreat." The "apparent" demise of the Soviet Empire will speed the dismantling of NATO; Western Europe's and America's military structures will be dismembered in the new "era of peace, death of Communism, end of the Cold War and collapse of the evil empire;" and the USSR's long-term goal of the neutralization of their western flank, preparatory to the absorption of Western Europe [politically, economically and militarily] will have been accomplished.

Agents of Revolution and The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion

    Because of their importance and length, we have left a study of the Protocols until last. We will not begin that study. Then you make up your own mind as to their veracity and truthfulness.

    Mrs. Webster, after having set forth the history of the society, gives the answer in succinct fashion in World Revolution, p. 181: "The Internationale, though itself an open and avowed association, thus became, through the absorption of these existing secret societies, a huge semi-secret society, that is to say, it formed the outer shell that covered a ramification of conspiracies...of which the secrets were known only to its middle-class directors. The anti-religious policy adopted by the Internationale was the work of these secret influences."

    For a full answer, however, it would be necessary to study the careers of the Jewish founders of this society, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. A few words must suffice here, but they will be enough to show that many of the Gentile instruments, who figure as leaders, are really the dupes of Jewish capitalism. Let us first examine Marx's formation and his outlook on life.

    Karl Marx was the grandson of a Jewish rabbin of Cologne [Marx's real name was Mordechai]. As a young man, he entered the society, founded by Ganz, Zunz and Moses Moser, and known as the Jewish Union for Civilization and Science. The directing idea of this union was that the Jewish nation, and not a member of that nation, WAS TO BE THE MESSIAS WHO SHOULD CONQUER THE WORLD AND SUBJECT ALL NATIONS TO ITSELF.

    Here is how one of Karl Marx's neo-Messianic correspondents formulated the thesis: "THE JEWISH PEOPLE TAKEN COLLECTIVELY SHALL BE ITS OWN MESSIAS. Their rule over the universe shall be obtained by welding together the other races, thanks to the suppression of frontiers and monarchies, which form the bulwark of national particularities. Thus shall be established a Universal Republic...In this new organization of humanity, the Jews, now scattered over the whole surface of the globe, all belonging to the same race and molded by the same traditional formation, without however forming a separate nationality, shall everywhere become the ruling element without opposition. This will be particularly easy, if they succeed in imposing on the masses of the working-classes the guidance of some of their number. The governments of the nations forming the Universal or World Republic shall all thus pass, without any effort, into Jewish hands, thanks to the victory of the proletariat. Private property can then be suppressed by the Jewish rulers who will be everywhere in charge of public affairs. Thus shall the promise of the Talmud be realized that when the Messianic epoch will have arrived the Jews shall have control of the wealth of the nations."

Click Here if you would like a hard copy of any of Willie Martin's books

Jew Watch - Willie Martin