Evolution A Jewish Deception
This study on "Evolution A Jewish Deception," is not all inclusive,
as to do such a study would encompass every single creature on earth. Therefore,
we submit the following for your review.
Charles Darwin was a devout Talmudist Jew and as such obtained
his training in the Cabala or Kabbala and Talmudic studies from the best
Rabbis in England and the United States. The theory of evolution comes
directly from the Jewish Kabbalah and the Talmud. And was conceived by
the Jews to deceive our people, the White Race into believing a completely
false relition, known as evolution, to turn them away from Yahweh and Yeashua.
Titus 1:14: "Not giving heed TO JEWISH FABLES, and commandments
of men, THAT TURN FROM THE TRUTH." And Jewish fables is exactly what the
theory of evolution is.
It is because that true followers of Yeashua do not believe nor
adhere to this false Jewish Fables that the Jews hate the so-called Christian
Identity believers so very much for they: 2 Pet 1:16: "For we have not
followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power
and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty."
Evolution A Jewish Deception
Due to the tremendous amount of unbelief in Almighty God and the
Lord Jesus Christ in America today, and a seemingly worship of evolution,
in government, I have compiled this presentation for your consideration.
Please give me the courtesy of reading it before throwing it away.
Creation Not Evolution: The theory of evolution is that all forms
of life derived by gradual modification from earlier and simpler forms
or from one rudimentary form. It teaches a process in which something complex
is developed by itself from a simple beginning. It accepts the existence
of the cause or causes of the first substance and the force or forces working
successive transformations from a lower to a higher form of matter and
The theory of cosmic evolution claims that from lower units of
matter [atoms and molecules] the vast material suns, moons, stars, planets,
and universes were formed by themselves. That of organic evolution teaches
that the vegetable and animal kingdoms evolved from lower forms of life
to what they are today.
Utter Foolishness of Evolution: Evolutionists do not deny the
first cause. Their theory begins with matter or substance already in existence.
They believe in primitive nebulosity and powers possessed by molecules.
They do not try to account for how these came to exist, how molecules got
their inherent powers, or how there came to be definite laws governing
them so that they could produce, without failure, all things as we now
have them. Their theory does not show why there is such bitter hatred against
the God of the Bible as being that first cause.
It does not consider proven facts, but has absolute faith in a
mere supposition which no fact has ever been produced to prove it. Its
teachers seemingly deny God, the Bible, and known facts and continue to
rob multiplied thousands of boys and girls of their simple faith in God
and the Bible without a sting of conscience.
They manufacture multiplied drawings of human beings, different
kinds, rising from a molecule through a monkey to the present man; and
add guess upon guess of how life was in each stage of evolution, but refuse
to accept the Bible truth of the origin of all things.
They speak glibly of denying God and His work in the creation
and at the same time pose as having the only truth on the subject. Huxley
said, "It is clear that the doctrine of evolution is directly antagonistic
to that of creation...Evolution, if consistently accepted, makes it impossible
to believe in the Bible."
Darwin (Charles Darwin's Uncle, factory owner Josiah Wedgewood,
owned a business that worked White Children of five years of age in a chemical
factory permeated with Lead Oxide, a deadly poison. Wedgewood acknowledged
that the lead made the children "very subject to disease" but worked them
anyway) taught that the more complex organs and instincts have been perfected
by the accumulation of innumerable slight variations, each good for the
individual possessor. Spencer said that evolution was purely mechanical
Earnest Haeckel said, "It entirely excludes the supernatural process,
every prearranged and conscious act of a personal character. Nothing
will make the full meaning of the theory of descent clearer than calling
it the non-miraculous theory of creation."
Thus the confessed evolution-theory leaders are clear that no
true evolutionist can be a Christian or a believer in the Bible. There
is no place for God in evolution, hence no need of a belief in sin or a
Saviour, heaven or hell.
Those in the church who try to harmonize evolution with the Bible
rule God out in spite of themselves and are the enemies of both God and
No one branch of organic evolution has been proven, much less
the main theory. It is a bankrupt, speculative, philosophy -- not a scientific
True Science Rejects:
1). The theory that the hair is but elongated scales of prehistoric
2). The legs of all animals developed from warts on aboriginal
3). Eyes are but accidental development of freckles on blind amphibians
that responded to the sun.
4). Ears came about by the air waves calling to spots on early
5). The theory of natural selection.
6). Man came from monkeys.
7). The vast universes came from a few molecules.
8). Nothing working on nothing by nothing, through nothing, for
nothing begat everything.
Fallacies of Evolution:
A). It accepts heathen and pagan philosophers in preference to
God, Christ, the Holy Spirit, the Bible, Christians. Pagan Hindu and Greek
Philosophers invented such a theory. Aristotle taught An Internal Spontaneity,
which is the same idea of modern evolutionists who call it Resident Forces
or Impersonal Eternal Energy.
B). It nullifies the idea of Bible creation by God. Blind force
is substituted for the creative power of the personal and living God who
created all things.
C). It degrades man from creation by God in the image of God to
a monkey ancestry.
D). It degrades God's image to a mere beast.
E). It makes Christ, the second and last Adam, nothing more than
a mere animal.
F). It does away with the fall of man, for how can a mere beast
who has evolved steadily from a molecule to an intelligent being go backward
and have a fall?
G). It does away with Bible miracles and the supernatural in all
its forms. The only miracle or power of evolution is the inherent force
H). It does away with the virgin birth, makes it impossible and
unnecessary, and makes Christ a product of evolution in the same sense
that it does all other men.
I). It denies the bodily resurrection of Christ and declares that
it is contrary to the process of evolution of resident forces making progress.
J). It denies the atonement, for according to evolution there
was no fall of man and therefore no sin to make atonement for. Regeneration
by outside power is the direct opposite of the resident powers, the only
power accepted by evolution.
K). It denies the 2nd advent of Christ and the final restoration
and preservation of all things by the personal acts of God.
L). It does away with the authority of the Bible as a real revelation
from a personal and living God, making it a lie, not only in regards to
creation but every other doctrine.
To argue that the Christian can accept evolution on the grounds
that the Bible is not to be taken literally, is a surrender to the foes
of God, Christ, The Holy Spirit, the Bible, and all Christian teachings.
The theory therefore, is anti-God, anti-Christ, anti-Bible, anti-Christian,
Evolution A Jewish Deception
Facts Disproving Evolution: The Bible in its entirety condemns
the theories of both cosmic and organic evolution. It declares in no uncertain
terms that God created [brought into existence] all the material and moral
creations; the animate and inanimate things, and that He is the first and
last cause of all existing universes and the things therein.
The Bible declared God created the heavens and the earth; God
created great whales and every living creature (Genesis 1:20); God created
man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female
created He them (Genesis 1:26-28; 2:7; 19-25; 5:1-2; 9:6); All things were
made by Him; and without Him was not anything made that was made (John
1:3); God created all things by Jesus Christ (Ephesians 3:9; Colossians
1:15-18); The upholding of all things by the word of His power (Hebrews
1:3); Thou hast created all things, and for Thy pleasure they are and were
created. (Revelation 4:11)
It is a law of nature that nothing reproduces anything greater
than itself. If this is true of all species today, of which we have millions
of examples, then it was true originally. The vast creations of matter
and life had to come into existence by a superior power, not an inferior
One thing is certain: All intelligence and matter could not have
come from one or any number of molecules of unintelligence. The most that
has ever been done or can possibly be done is to demonstrate the law of
improvement of a species through breeding and cultivation.
No New Species Has Been or Can Be Produced by Such A Law: If left
alone the plants and animals would quickly degenerate, not improve themselves
in any degree, which will be shown below.
Therefore, we must conclude that no amount of unintelligent matter
could produce intelligence or intelligent beings -- anything higher than
itself. The intelligent and innumerable self-producing species of creatures,
each with its own eternal and consistent traits, distinct flavored, and
infinite combinations of chemicals, could never be the product of unintelligent
Each one of the millions of creatures that reproduce their own
kind by fixed and eternal laws must be the work of an all-powerful and
The Bible declares that everything created by God was given the
power to reproduce its own kind. No one thing could break this law and
reproduce any other kind. 1656 years later it had not been broken.
Now, after thousands of years the laws of reproduction is still
unbroken. The sponge is still a sponge and has not become an oyster, octopus,
a turtle, frog, fish, or crab.
None of These Have Ever Reproduced Anything Except Their Own Kind:
No lowly earth-worm has ever turned into a spider, tarantula, scorpion,
lizard, tortoise, snake, or crocodile. No bug, bird, or animal has ever
changed from its own kind or reproduced another kind which was fertile
and could produce a new kind.
The crossing of an ass and a mare, for instance, will produce
a mule which cannot reproduce itself. No monkey has ever produced a man
and the missing-link is still missing. All this is quite remarkable in
view of the fact that there are over 2,000,000 different species of plant
and animal life.
Each species proves the law of reproduction established by God--
after his own kind. It is claimed that there are more than 1,000,000 species
of insects. Species of beetles number 250,000; butterflies and moths 110,000;
shell-fish 80,000; snails 80,000; arachnids 60,000; flies 40,000; barnacles,
crabs, lobsters, and shrimp 25,000; fish 20,000; bees 10,000; wasps 10,000;
worms 9,000; ants 5,000; birds 1,200; and cockroaches 1,000. Besides these,
there are many species of larger animals, and over 180,000 species of plants;
species of fungi number 100,000; algae 20,000; mosses 20,000; corals 5,000;
and sponges 3,000 besides many other species of living things.
All species exist in great variety, and the so-called proofs of
the evolutionists are merely variations, or minor changes within the same
species. Out of billions of living organisms and fossils there is no evidence
of the slightest tendency to evolve out of the original kind to which each
belongs, into a new species. There is only the evidence of development
and normal growth; but these are not evolution.
Improvement of a species and new varieties within the species
are not evolution. The theory of evolution teaches TRANSMUTATION,
a change in nature, substance, form, and alteration of essence by a slow
and gradual process of Mutation from one species to another, and from the
lower to the higher.
This has never been done, nor can it be done. In nature we find
endless variety within each species of kind, But No Change From One Species
Without A Change of Species There Can Be No Evolution! God has
made life so that it interbreeds in closely related variations; and when
interbreeding is attempted between different kinds of species it is found
that there is an impassable gulf which cannot be crossed.
Life multiplies abundantly. One bacterium in 24 hours can produce
281,500,000,000,000 descendents. A fly can lay 500 eggs in a season, each
of which can develop into a fly capable of laying 500 eggs of its own.
If all the eggs hatched and survived the original fly would have enough
descendents in 6 months to cover the earth with flies, to a depth of about
A common potato bug is said to be capable of producing 60,000
offspring in a season; a single sunfish lays 3,000,000,000 eggs a season;
an oyster 100,000,000; a codfish 10,000,000; a toad 20,000; spiders have
2,000 babies in one cocoon; a logger-head turtle lays 1,000 eggs at a time;
and a pair of meadow mice could produce 1,000,000 offspring in a single
year. An elm tree produces 1,584,000,000 seeds and a barley seed 18,000
grains. But out of the billions of yearly reproductions of nature, Not
one Monkey's tail has been produced by anything except a Monkey. There
is no proof of man in various stages from a molecule to a monkey, or from
a monkey to a man!
There can be no Evolution without the power of reproduction in
living things. Since reproduction is a prior condition to Evolution, it
cannot be a product of it!
Hence, we face the logical necessity for the creation of life
and its power of continued reproduction. The power of reproduction is not
in the embryo, but only in the mature parent. An egg cannot produce an
It is also true that the egg is not improvable by itself. Improvement
can come only in and through the mature form. Therefore, the parent-form
of life must have been created in the beginning to have produced an egg
from which offspring alone can come.
Evolution A Jewish Deception
- Part 3
Science has proven that dead matter cannot generate life; and
that only life can come from pre-existing life. When test tubes were filled
with hay and other organic matter, when all life-germs were completely
destroyed, when the tube was hermetically sealed to exclude outer air,
and while it was absolutely free of living germs, not one vestige of life
The attempt to get the living out of the dead completely failed.
The theory of spontaneous generation of evolution has had to be given up.
It is now recognized that life can only come from life. All life is dependent
upon other life; the lower upon the higher; the simple upon the complex;
the powerless upon the powerful; the impersonal upon the personal; the
unintelligent upon the intelligent; the non-existing upon the existing;
the natural upon the spiritual; the temporary upon the eternal. Nothing
can come from nothing or be produced by nothing.
The argument of evolution from embryology; that embryos of different
forms of life are somewhat alike so they must have come from a common ancestor;
has utterly failed, as have the theories of natural selection, and the
survival of the fittest. The similarity of embryos and their fast development
to full growth are contrary to the principles of the evolution teachers
have to argue due to the fact that no single example of evolution from
one species to another can be cited.
Design In Infant Nutrition: By definition, evolutionary scientists
believe that life came through random chance processes, including natural
selection. However, in n ature there is a chorus of voices with the message
that evolutionary theory does not blend with either simple or complex observations.
In order to maintain good health, the following must be present
simultaneiously and in proper balance: organic vitamins, minerals, essential
fatty acids, eight essential amino acids, and unrefined carbohydrates.
These are all present in human breast milk, as are hundreds of other less-well
understood food factors. The more the human breast and its milk are studied,
the more obvious it is that neither random chance nor survival of the fittest
could explain their design and complexity.
Paul Palma, M.D., and Eugene Adcock, M.D., of the University of
Texas Medical Center, along with Dr. Buford Nichol of the Children's Nutrition
Research Center in Houston, Texas, are among the many researchers who have
discovered some amazing facts about human milk. In their studies, Macro-hutrients,
micro-nutrients, immunological factors and psychosocial factors were analyzed.
Their results are discussed below. (Practical Therapeutics, 1981, Vol.
24, pp. 123-181, Palma, P.A., Adcock III, E.W. "Human Milk and Breast-
Macro-Nutrients: The calorically important compoents of milk are
1). Carbohydrates: lactose, a disaccharide, composed
of glucose and galactose.
The caloric content and the nutrient balance of the mother's milk
change dramatically according to the infant's needs. Our most brilliant
neonatologists with the best computers could not design a better balanced
product for an infant regardless of his needs at whatever age or stage
of development. The concentration of these nutrients is dramatically affected
by two factors; the duration of gestation before birth (i.e., is the baby
premature or mature at birth); and the stage of lactation.
2). Lipids: polyunsaturated long and medium chain fatty acids.
3). Proteins: nitrogen-containing compounds in the form of long
chains of amino acids.
Duration of Gestation:
Lipids: The premature infant has increased caloric needs. Fifty
percent of milk's caloric content comes from lipids. The milk provided
for a premature infant has more lipids than the breast milk for a mature
or term infant. At this time the mother's milk also has higher levels of
lipases, enzymes which make the lipid content bioavailable to the infant.
But it must be fresh, for lipases deteriorate in pooled mother's milk or
cow's milk, particularly if it has been pasteurized.
Protens: It is now known that during the first month of lactation,
the nitrogen and ptotein content decline. However, the premature mother's
milk is as much as 20% higher in proteins. In evolutionary terms,
this weak premature infant should be culled out by a survival of the fittest
process, but three advantages for the premature have been found in this
1). The ratio of cysteine to methionine is high, thereby
overcoming the limited biosynthetic capabilities of the premature child
to produce cysteine.
Lactose: Lactose and the enzyme lactase, which greatly accelerates
lactose digestion, are balanced in the milk at concentrations ideally suited
for the maturity of the baby. In summary, the design of the milk is perfect
in caloric content, amino acid concentrations, and in the enzyme concentrations
of both lipase and lactase, ideally meeting the infant's needs. Its make-up
far surpasses that of any formula, or even milk from animal sources.
2). Taurine, aminoethylsulfonic acid, which may be essential for
neonates, is present in high concentrations in the mother's milk for prematurely
born infants. Taurine is very low in cow's milk.
3). The potentially toxic aromatic amino acids, phenylalanine,
and tyrosine, are lower in concentration in human milk than in animal's
milk. Human milk proteins are more easily assimilated by the child than
the proteins in animals' milk. Some of these proteins are absolutely vital
for the healthy development of the infant's immune system.
Stage of Lactation: Lactation can be divided into three stages:
the early milk or colostrum; transitional milk, from one to four weeks;
and mature milk, changing as the baby ages. (Barnes, L.A., ed., Advances
in Pediatrics, Vol. 26, Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers, Inc., 1979,
pp. 136-61, Nichols, B.L. Nichols, V.N. "Lactation.") Also, during a single
meal the concentration of the milk even changes between early feeding and
the late feeding time. Theories as to why suggest that these changes stabilize
the volume of the fluid in the baby's circulatory system.
Where would the human be if the first mother's breast had not
yet developed the ability to produce just one of several specific enzymes
to speed the digestion of the lactose, lipids, or proteins found in her
milk? What if one of the essential amino acids, fatty acids, vitamins,
minerals, etc., were not in a bioavailable form or in optimal concentrations
in the first mother's milk?
Human kind would not have existed through one generation. Certainly
a Designer is a necessity. Random chance equals no chance in the case of
life and death. Time for development equals death before the complex enzymes
Evolution A Jewish Deception
- Part 4
Survival of the fittest? Why would a random process protect the
weak, premature infant with such a complexly designed, ever- changing milk?
The Designer syas that His strength was made perfect through weakness.
Micronutrients: If the study of the macro-nutrients in milk is
not convincing, take a brief look at the micro-nutrients. Micro- nutrients
include vitamins and minerals. They are found in very small concentrations.
Hundreds of other nutrients are also in breast milk; we do not
know how most of them function. One of the functions that is known is to
enhance the bioavailability (or ease of utilization) of other micronutrients.
Researchers many years ago wrongly concuded that human breast milk did
not have vitamin D, and supplemental formulas were recommended.
Years later it was learned that a liquid soluble type of vitamin
D, formerly undetected and unique to breast milk, was present which totally
met the needs of the infant when combined with the unknown food factors
in milk. The whole complex design is greater than the sum of its individual
components and greater than our ability to understand.
Iron and zinc are similar examples in human breast milk. The breast-fed
baby has no need for supplements. However, cow's milk, formulas, and pooled
pasteurized human milk all need supplements to prevent deficiencies.
Immunobiology: The early milk, or colostrum, sets in motion the
infant's immunoreactive system. There are two classes of immunoactive components
in the early milk; cells and soluble protein factors. Human milk is a truly
living fluid in which antibodies and cells move about. The cells in the
mother's milk not only attack bacteria that may be harmful to the baby,
but apparently they have the ability to produce antibodies that destroy
bacteria and viruses as well. Evidently the infant who is exposed to infecitons
and nurses from its mother, also produces changes in the mother's breast.
Within hours the next milk contains antibodies and immunoglobulins to protect
the baby before the infant exhibits visible systoms.
Psycholsocial: There are many other advantages for breast feeding
which have not been mentioned. We should at least mention the more tender
benefits to both mother and child of breast feeding. The close contact
entails tactile, auditory, olfactory, and visual interchange which reinforce
bonding. This deepening relationship may even be more important than the
advantages discussed above.
These virtues have been observed in many studies. The longer the
duration of breast feeding, the more measurable the quality of mother-child
bonding. Benefits have been noted for nursing up to two years after birth.
There is also a significantly lower risk of child abuse and failure to
These characteristics of mother's milk and breast feeding would
indicate an extensive design which makes the practice "very good" for healty,
weak, and sickly infants. "Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast
thou ordained strength because of thine enemies, that thou mightest still
the enemy and the avenger." (Psalm 8:2)
This verse has two words speaking of a suckling nursing babe.
It also indicates that an infant has special strength against his enemy.
Is there any evidence that infants have prolonged benefits from the mother's
milk or that the parent might also be stronger?
Infants who have been breast-fed have been studied up to five
years of age. They have a much lower incidence of diarrhea, urinary tract
infecitons, pneumonia, vomiting, asthma, earaches, childhood allergies,
and crib death. Also, viral and bacterial infecitons, cancers, and learning
disabilities are less of a problem, as are psychological problems. Parents
of these children will be spared much anguish and will also avoid costly
medical care. Furthermore, in the New England Journal of Medicine, (Vol.
330, 1994, p. 81) the incidence of breast cancer was shown to be decreased
by 25% in women proportional to the amount of time that they breast-fed
infants during their lives.
"There is a way which seemeth right unto man; but the end thereof
are the ways of death." (Proverbs 14:12)
How many have suffered because man thought he had a better idea
and recommended baby formulas with supplements instead of the real thing?
The value of a formula today is measured by how close it can come to the
mother's milk, but still they fall short.
Is there any way random chance (even controlled by "Mother Nature,"
"Mother Earth," or millions of mutation) could produce such an awesome
product? If the mother's milk was not well- designed from the beginning,
humankind would be extinct. Human milk cries the message of design! Time
(years, or millions of years) would be the enemy of humans if this milk
were not fully designed from the beginning. Thank the Creator! (Impact
#259, January 1995; by Rex D. Russel, M.D. *Dr. Russell is interested in
the heath benefits gained by obedience to the Creator's ordinances and
commands. He is a vascular invasive radiologist at Holt Krock, Ft. Smith,
Arkansas. He trained at Holt Krock and at the Mayo Clinic)
Human and other embryos pass through various stages of growth
very rapidly. In the case of some, the progress of growth is so rapid that
it is miraculous. Thus, evolutionists are forced to believe in miracles,
which they deny. In other miracles, which they deny, in other fields, but
sustain in their own, in the effort to prove their claims.
It is now known that there are radical differences between the
embryos of vertebrates [backboned animals] and invertebrates [animals without
back-bones] which we would not have if all things had a common ancestor.
Some similarity among embryos of all forms of life should be expected,
since all start individually from a single life-germ or a combination of
If a botanist would be asked the difference between an oak, a
palm-tree, and a lichen, he would declare that they are separated from
one another by the broadest line of classification. But if the germs of
these plants were placed before him, to choose one from the other, he could
not do it. Under the most powerful microscope they would yield no clue.
If analyzed by the chemist they would still keep their secret.
The same is true of the life-germ of various animals and man. No one can
tell which is which. What makes the little speck grow into the millions
of different kinds of creatures?
What is there which the eye cannot see that determines which of
the many creatures it shall be? Only a personal and an infinite intelligent
Being could make such unfailing laws of reproduction; after his kind. It
is further argued that man and monkey are so similar that they must have
come from a common ancestor.
This is neither sound logic nor sound science. Resemblance proves
nothing but resemblance. Similarity proves nothing but similarity. Resemblance
and similarity run throughout all nature in things that have no connection
with each other.
Evolution A Jewish Deception
- Part 5
Resemblance or similarity on some points is to be expected even through
we accept creation by God. Such only magnifies the fact of an intelligent
operator. This is true whether it is the Creator or a manufacturer as in
every factory of man. The wheel, for example, is the same in the wagon,
the car, locomotive, and plane. But such similarity does not prove that
the wagon evolved into an automobile, then into a locomotive, then into
an airplane, and finally into a rocket.
All animals and men have the same kind of faculties to breathe,
cat food, and perform other bodily functions, but no such similarity proves
close relationship. God made them thus so that all could exist alike in
the same air and on similar foods.
The dissimilarities between man and lower animals, and not only
in body, but also in brain, spirit and soul faculties prove that they are
NOT related. The differences between man and monkey are so wide that any
single bodily part is sufficient in itself to prove whether it is a part
of man or monkey.
Evolutionists themselves confirm this fact by their promptness
in deciding whether a bone is from a monkey or a man. There are hundreds
of differences between the bodies of men and apes, and thousands of differences
between those two in mental, moral, spiritual, and habitual matters which
prove evolution of man from apes or lower life and impossibility. Degeneration
-- The similarities between man and lower animals could be used to prove
a process of degeneration from man more than a process of evolution to
The Bible teaches, God made man before He made land animals; on
day 6. There-fore, man came first, and then the monkey. Darwin's argument
that plants and animals have within themselves tendencies to vary of their
own accord in many and all directions to an unlimited degree, has been
disproved many times.
Mendel's experiments prove conclusively that plants and animals,
even under man's selective skill in breeding, do not tend to vary in all
directions and to an unlimited degree; but that the variations are within
strict limits and work according to fixed laws producing unvarying results.
The theory of natural selection and of inheritance of acquired
characters has failed for lack of proof. The forms of vegetables, plants,
and animals that man succeeds in improving by human selection and cultivation
revert rapidly to type as soon as man's directing skill is removed.
In all man's directing skill is removed. In all man's selection
and cultivation he can work only within the limits of the species. No change
into new species has been produced either by natural or artificial selection.
The iron law of sterility stands guard at the far frontiers of the species
and everything continues to reproduce after his kind.
There is a certain potency of development implanted in all things,
but such potential powers are led out into actual development or improvement,
not through resident forces, as evolution teaches, but only through outside
intervention and intelligent help.
Man can develop the wild rose into the American Beauty, or the
wild pony into the Kentucky Thoroughbred, by selection, better environment,
breeding, etc., but it is most significant that these improvements do not
continue to increase, or even persist, when things are left to themselves.
The rose reverts once again into a wild rose if left alone, and the horse
begins to revert back to its degenerated type the very minute man's skill
If one takes a flock of highly developed pigeons, with all their
shades of color and variety of markings, and turns them loose in the forest
to see if they will improve or degenerate, he will find in a few years
that they have all returned to one type. Compelled by an unfailing natural
law, all will revert to common colors instead of being a variety with beautiful
Improvements brought about by care and selection in breeding will
be gone, Proving The Theory of Evolution To Be A Failure!
The same thing will happen to man. If he neglects himself, he
will revert to a worse and lower type of man, like those who have been
discovered on desert islands or in jungles. If the mind is neglected it
will degenerate into imbecility and ignorance. Solitary confinement has
the power to unmake men's minds and leave them idiots. If the conscience
is neglected it will run off into lawlessness and sin. The soul that is
neglected will go into ruin and depravity. Only three possibilities are
before us; balance, improvement only to a certain degree, or degeneration.
The Bible Question: The Bible question is: How shall we escape
if we neglect it? These three possibilities face every man. He has a desire
to better himself and yet he is constantly beset with a gravitation to
sin and the law of death working in his very being. We say that nature
is full of life, but in reality it is full of death. Plant life and animal
life are kept alive by a temporary endowment which gives power over the
elements that cause death.
Withdraw the elements of life and the true nature will be revealed.
Life is merely the suspension of these destructive powers; the sum total
of the functions that resist death. Spiritual life is the same; the sum
total of the functions that resist sins. If we neglect the use of these
powers death will result. The man who does not properly use the powers
to live is as much dead as a man falling 500 ft., is as good as dead the
first foot of the fall. Unless he is stopped he is a dead man. One who
continues to neglect life is dead. If we neglect it, degeneration sets
in. If we use the powers of life to resist sin, we live.
To use the argument that the savages of heathen darkness are more
like monkeys than men in the civilized world is no proof of evolution;
it is proof of degeneration. Man fell from original sinlessness and the
highest degree of intelligence to the present status. Adam had more intelligence
the day he was created than all-men together have now. He could name all
the things God created, but all the men today who learn all their lives
cannot yet do this.
Degeneration: Degeneration: Explains the present uncivilized parts
of the world, and the so-called cavemen; the Peking man, the Heidelberg,
the Neanderthal, the Cro-Magnon man and others. All problems between true
science and the Bible can be solved by the facts of degeneration, or with
the Bible truth of a pre-Adamite world.
Belief in the pre-Adamite system allows that the earth could be
millions of years old. Pre-historic animals could have been a part of that
system, as well as any different type of man, if such is ever excluded
from Adam's race by established proof.
Fossil remains have been referred to as one of the strongest proofs
of evolution. But evolutionists themselves acknowledge that this proof
is extremely fragmentary, limited, and obscure due to the fact of only
a few fossil remains. Hence, they are forced to guess without proof.
Jewish Deception Part 6
The Missing Links Between Man and Monkey Have Never Been Found: The
manufactured bones of pre-historic men are all fakes. The Piltdown man,
for example, was no man at all. The story is that in a gravel pit in Sussex,
England near Piltdown Common, two or three bits of skull bone, a piece
of jaw-bone, and a tooth were found by different persons in different places
in different years. From these few scraps so-called scientists constructed
the Piltdown man and named it the Dawn-man of the dateless past. From the
same bones another later type was made by another team of scientists.
Finally it was acknowledged that the jaw-bone which was unquestionably
human; the Peking-man of China was made from human skull fragments found
in a cave, in 1929; the Swanscombe-man of England was made from the back
and one side of a woman's skull; the Fontechevade-man of Africa was made
from an ape skull found in a number of other ape skulls and bones in Africa;
and the Hesperopithecus Haroldcookii, the Nebraska-man, was made from a
single pig tooth said to be 1,000,000 years old.
Pictures of these, the man-made specimens, have been the so- called
proof shown in the school textbooks. Such are the Hoaxes which are being
bassed upon our innocent boys and girls by some educators in the name of
The old geological scheme to prove evolution has also been repudiated.
Instead of the older rocks being found at the bottom and the younger rocks
at the top, as would be the case if evolution were true, the opposite is
often the case.
This explodes the evolution-theory of natural building up of the
strata. The fact of two universal floods instead of one [One in Lucifer's
day and one in Noah's day] and a later division of the earth can easily
explain the fossil remains being where they are. In Lucifer's flood God
turned the earth upside down by earthquakes. This accounts for fossil remains
being found deep in the earth underneath many layers of solid rock.
Such things never would have been there without the earthquakes
and judgment of God. It is evident that many fossils came from a great
catastrophe, being entombed in the strata instead of being slowly buried
by sedimentation over millions of years. We read of whole schools of fish,
covering large fields which have been found with every indication of a
violent and sudden death.
They are not in a relaxed position but often with their head twisted
around to their tails and every fin extended, which is the position in
which a fish dies when overtaken by an enemy or some catastrophe. Historians
tell us that the earth has undergone one great and indescribable catastrophe.
This happened during Lucifer's flood or when the earth was divided
into continents. That there was a dividing of the earth in the days of
Peleg is clear from Genesis 10:25. Such a shaking up of the entire earth,
as well as the flood-catastrophe of Lucifer's time could have caused fossils
to become deeply submerged.
The Arctic regions give clear evidence of a sudden calamity. In
their extensive fields of fossilized and frozen mammoths, where multitudes
of giant creatures have been found, some have been discovered with their
stomachs filled with undigested food, and in some instances with their
mouths also shows that they were feeding quietly when the crisis came and
that they were destroyed with suddenness.
That the Arctic regions had tropical climate when these beasts
were destroyed seems true, for they had tropical food in their mouths.
Evidently they were frozen immediately when God withheld the sun, moon,
and stars from shining on the earth during Luficer's flood.
Regarding Noah's flood, God commanded male and female of every
species to be kept alive in the ark to replenish the earth after his kind
when the flood was over. Had the evolutionists been right, this would have
been unnecessary. Noah could have merely saved a couple of molecules, turned
them loose after the flood and eventually, we could have the innumerable
living things again in all their varieties.
If evolution is responsible for all the vast creations in space
and the endless varieties of species of life on the innumerable planets,
then why is the law not working today? And why do we not have actual and
unquestionable examples of the various stages of evolution from the lowest
to the highest forms of life? If evolution ever worked, it should be working
today so that every form or stage of development could be seen as proof
that the lower forms of life will eventually be the higher in the ages
Is it not strange that the process has been on earth to observe
the law of evolution at work? Is it not strange that man has not produced
one example of change from one species to another, not even to the losing
of the monkey tail and hair?
There is evidence now that the whole world and all in it are degenerating
and moving toward some climax or judgment and recreation, instead of evolving
upward into higher and better forms. In chemistry, which is closest to
the deeper facts and forces of inanimate matter and life, there is no evidence
of a surge upward. Not only are the laws of chemical affinity static and
unchangeable as to their operations, but there is a disintegrating tendency
downward instead of upward that seems to characterize all matter. The tendency
of atoms of high atomic weight to break up into other atoms of lower weight
seems to be the universal tendency of all matter. Scientists declare that
this is also true in the vegetable and animal kingdoms.
The evolution theory is not only absurd -- its so-called proofs
are so contradictory that they cause increasing doubt regarding its guesses.
Tyndal says that the world began in a fire-mist that contracted as it became
cold; but Spencer says it was a cold-cloud that became heated and contracted.
The age of man is estimated all the way from 550,000,000 years to as little
as 6,000,000 years. The age of the earth is put by guessers as 10-billion
to the lowest estimate of 10-million years. This proves nothing but the
unreliability of data which is used in the effort to prove diverse conclusions.
Science vs. Reason: The world of science has not escaped the attention
of the conspiracy, and its interest has been spurred of late by the sudden
increase in the research into a competing theory. The basic foundation
block of current scientific thought is the theory of evolution. So important
is this theory that there are those who say that anyone finding fault with
it is ignorant: "No informed person doubts any more that the many animal
types that inhabit the earth today are the results of a process of evolution."
(Time Magazine, April 7, 1980, p. 65)
This position is further strengthened by those who claim that
evolution is no longer a theory: "...evolution is not a guess, it is an
established Theory that is fully proved by known facts." (The Evolution
of Man, Charles H. Kerr & Co., 1905, p. 3)