Parts 41 through 48
By Willie Martin

Jew Watch

Communism - Part 41

 Three top Communist defectors have all said virtually the same thing. General Jan Sejna, former Soviet Bloc military officer, Ion Pacepa, a KGB man, and Anatoliy Golitsyn another KGB man. In fact, Golitsyn in his book Red Horizons says that the overall aim of Soviet policy is to: "Bring about a major and irreversible shift in the balance of world power in favor of the Soviet Bloc as a preliminary to...a world-wide federation of Communist States...Western acceptance of the new liberalization as genuine would create favorable conditions for the fulfillment of Communist strategy for USA and Western Europe."

 Restructuring and Renaming the Communist Party of the Soviet Union: The CPSU has 20 million members and another 45 million members in its Lenin youth organization Komosomol (Komsomol is a youth organization with members from the Red Army, the KGB, the Red Navy, the Air Force, and a majority of the young factory workers). The CPSU has grown top heavy and inefficient with bureaucratic deadweight. It is about to be reorganized, restructured, trimmed in size (or purged) to increase its efficiency, and Renamed. It is Not going to be Abolished as Gorbachev, Bush, and the Soviet and Western Press keep telling us.

 It should be remembered that the Communist Party of the Soviet Union has undergone a number of metamorphoses in name: At its inception, it was called the Bund. Then it was renamed the Russian Social Democratic Worker's Party. In 1912, following an internal feud, it split into the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks (the "big ones" and the "little ones"). The big ones ate the little ones. The name then became the Russian Social Democratic Workers Party of Bolsheviks. In 1918, it became the Russian Communist Party (Bolshevik). In 1925, the name was changed again to the All-Soviet Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which it has remained until the present. It is now about to be renamed again (probably to the Social Democratic Party).

 Each of these name changes was accompanied by major fanfare, "absolute proof that the communists had completely changed," and the declaration that all the political, economic, and repressive evils had been perpetrated by the Previous Party, but that the new party would be benign, democratic, freedom loving, etc. In reality, all of the old evils continued under the new, revamped party, nothing changed! The present name change will not alter any of the principles or the goals of the CPSU.

 Each of the major Communist party name changes under Lenin and Stalin were accompanied by Massive purges (called "party rejuvenation") to streamline the organization and bring it under formidable discipline. Millions of Russian Communists went to the wall or the gulag in those purges.

 Today's CPSU has become fat, dumb, lazy, careless, apathetic, and passive, and is ten times larger than during WW II. It has lost sight of its goal, it has become diluted, and will probably be trimmed by several million members. This is not abolition of the Party, it is reorganization, restructuring, and Strengthening of the Party.

 The Communists believe that Americans and most Westerners are shallow, superficial, gullible, and easily seduced by media-generated illusions. Hence, if they change the name of one of their fronts or parties, and declare the old organization to be dead, most Westerners will believe it. For decades they have routinely changed the names of their Communist front organizations in this manner. They just renamed the Communist Party of Italy, now calling it the Democratic Party. In Poland, the renamed the Communist Party (which was called the Polish United Workers Party) to the Social Democratic Party. In Romania, they renamed the old Rumanian Communist Party, calling the new party the New Salvation Front. In none of those cases, (or many others) did they really abolish those Communist parties. They simply renamed, reorganized and restructured the parties, while gullible naive Westerners believed the charade. It has been said, "a rose by any other name, is still a rose." Calling the CPSU the Social Democratic Party (to some such name) will not alter the fact that it is the same old CPSU with a new label and some new faces.

 Today, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union operates through elected representatives, the Politburo, and the Central Committee. The Central Committee of the CPSU (made up of 300-450 members) wields the real power in the USSR, and an inner circle of about 100 members really call the shots. These Central Committee members dominate the military and the KGB, as well as the "visible" politicians such as Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Shevardnaze and the various cabinet ministers. Gorbachev is simply an actor, an employee who is implementing the policy laid down by the Central Committee since the early '80s when they (and the KGB) drafted the script for the actions taking place today.

 The new refurbished, renamed Communist party was discussed at length at the CPSU's XXVIIth and XXVth Congress in '86 and '90. Gorbachev described the "new party" as: "A Party of Socialist Choice and Communist Perspective...A party adhering to humanistic ideals common to all mankind...intolerant of chauvinism, nationalism, racism, and any manifestation of Reactionary Ideology and obscurantism...A Party confirming the independence of Communist parties of the Union republics...A Party open for contacts, Co-Actions with the Communists, Social Democrats and Socialists of various countries."

 Reading the "new Party" profile as conceived by the CPSU leadership, it is clear that the only difference between the "old Party" and the "new Party" is in the new one's wide acceptance of all revolutionary movements throughout the world.

 Socialism To Be Substituted For Communism

 "The concept, the main idea, lies in the fact that we want to give a New Lease on Life to Socialism through perestroika and to reveal the potential of the socialist system." (Mikhail Gorbachev, October 1989) Then in December of 1989 Gorbachev stated: "Today we have perestroika, the Salvation of Socialism, giving it a second breath, revealing everything good which is in the system."

 The word "socialism" will be substituted for "Communism" and latter will be almost completely stricken from the Communist's vocabulary. From Lenin to Gorbachev, the Communists have used the two words inter-changeably. Socialism, as defined by Karl Marx in the Communist Manifesto, is what has been imposed on the peoples of the USSR, China, Cuba, etc.

 Socialism, as the stepping stone to the final utopian goal of Communism, involves abolition of private property, draconian political and financial regulations and controls on the people, huge heritage, a monopolistic central bank, central control of education, and state control of the family, children, religion, etc. That sounds a little bit like America in 1991, does it not? If you are like most Americans, you probably wonder why the so-called Right Wing is constantly saying that the United States has become a Communist Nation. Well the following from Northpoint Tactical Teams, P.O. Box 129, Topton, North Carolina 28781 tells it best, in our opinion.

 Americans, have been watching the degeneration of their society, the increase in violence, drugs, pornography, and the fanatical rise in the national debt, and asks what will we do when America falls into Socialism, Communism, insolvency and surrender. Well, make no mistake about it, the Thought-theology of what we understand is Communism (Judism) HAS taken over in America. It is not called by that name however, it is called Socialism. The Hammer and Sickle does not adorn our flag, but we are under the control of Communism just as surely as there is a God in Heaven and that Jesus Christ sits at His right hand.

 In June '91, Yeltsin (promising "swift moves to establish greater democracy and market economics") was elected (in the first-ever such election) President of the Russian Republic, which has 150-million of the Soviet Union's 285-million people. (He has since assumed near dictatorial powers).  Following that election the Western press enthusiastically described Yeltsin as "Bigger Than Life, The Russian People Love Him." His image, readability, and standing in the West went into orbit as he APPEARED to "stand in the gap" against the hard-line "gang of eight" coup perpetrators during the recent August coup/counter-coup drama. As he "appeared" to stand off the entire Soviet Army and KGB almost single- handedly, the Western media and public opinion went ballistic. Americans were barraged with articles with typical headlines such as: "The Right Stuff: Yeltsin Joins the Ranks of Robin Hood, Moses, and Churchill." (This will be difficult for many to believe, one can hear them say, what:, England do that to this country? Why they are our greatest ally, we could not do without them. Let us look at the record and see just how much love there is for us in this pretended friendship. To begin with, when we were at war with Spain, this great Churchill, "Churchill entered British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces and fired on the American forces. It was a little embarrassing when the Honorable William Langer of North Dadota made this announcement on the floor of the United States Senate. Mr. Churchill was in this country, because you know, we never hit a man behind his back, he was going to speak in Boston, a little more of the Churchillian propaganda. Learning that this statement had been made by the patriotic Senator Langer, Mr. Churchill was a little upset, he sent a telegram to the Honorable Tom Connally denying the fact. Good Friend, as he was, Senator Connally rose to his feet and read the telegram to the Senate.

 Little did they realize that the records were available, that already these facts had been read to the Senate and were in the Congressional Record. Once again Senator Langer read the record to the Senate. Mr. Churchill is a brilliant man, but how stupid to try to deny what he has sanctioned in his biography, for you will find the record in World's Who's Who and a very good account in International Who's Who. The preface to these books states "This volume contains an authentic record of notable men and women throughout the world, page 114, 1940 edition: 'Winston Churchill...He entered the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces against the American forces in Cuba."

Communism - Part 42

  International Who's Who, page 158, published by Europe Publications Ltd. London, 39 Belford Square, W.C. 1 the 13th edition, states: "Churchill entered the army in 1895, served in Cuba with Spanish forces against the Americans. The preface in this book states, 'We wish to express our thanks to all those who, by completing questionnaires or by correcting proofs sent to them have enabled us to bring information up to date and to remind others that unless proofs are returned, no responsibility can be accepted for the accuracy of their biographical records."

 In 1946, the Biographical Encyclopedia of the World repeats: "Churchill entered the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces in Cuba." Webster's Biographical Dictionary, 1st edition by G. & C Merriam, publishers, Springfield, Mass., also states that "Churchill served in Cuba with the Spanish forces." Current Biography, 1940 edition, published by H.W. Wilson Co., 950 University Avenue, New York City also states: "Churchill: He was with the Spanish forces in Cuba." It was repeated in 1942. It is here that we find Churchill quoted: "He had always thought it a pity that it all had to be so make believe, and that the age of wars between civilized nations had come to an end forever, now he, at least had an opportunity to join civilized Spain in a war against uncivilized Cuba." Robert's account of Winston Churchill, 1928, Robert H. McBride, publishers, page 32, through Sir Henry Drummond, ambassador at Madrid, (Spain) Churchill: He joined the Spanish forces in Cuba in 1895. Spain conferred the 'Order of Military Merit, 1st class.'"

 While the New York Times, which prints "all the news that is fit to print," in their issue of September 19, 1945 states: "Churchill fought with Spain in Cuba." (And Men Wept, by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin))

Why Was Boris Yeltsin Not Neutralized?

 The TV news commentators would have us believe that hard-liners staged a coup to oust Gorbachev and revert to the old style Communist government but, because of the democratic forces already unleashed in the USSR and the courage of the people, the coup failed.

 But, one major fact does not fit into that theory and that fact is Yeltsin. The two key figures promoting change in the Soviet Union are Gorbachev, who wants moderately paced change, and Yeltsin who wants the rate of change to greatly speeded up. In recent months, many have accused Gorbachev of sacking reformers and putting representatives of the old guard in positions of power. Some, including Yeltsin, have gone as far as to suggest that, in this way, he laid the foundation for the coup.

 Now, if the coup was genuine, surely the hard-liners would have silenced the two key reformers, Gorbachev and Yeltsin. The very fact that Yeltsin was not neutralized shows that either the coup was badly bungled or it was designed to fail! Why was Yeltsin able to communicate with the outside world from his besieged White House, and through a host of TV and other journalists, for the full three days of the coup?

 Why was it not possible to cut the phone lines at the pole outside the building, or jam the radio communications? If Yeltsin had been silenced, there would have been no rallying point in Moscow and the world would not have been glued to their TV sets. The rapid and radical restructuring that followed the collapse of the coup is another indication that it was planned to fail! No, the coup leaders were mere front men who were used by the faceless, behind-the-scenes plotters who planned the coup to fail.

 Yeltsin's "thinking" is reflected in speeches he has made at the XXVIth and XXVIIth Party Congresses of the CPSU where he highly praised the tremendous strivings of the CPSU as well as the monumental advancements and great successes of the Soviet Union. As he said at the first of those Party Congresses:  "Today we find the mighty productive forces which poises our society, the wealth supplied to the Soviet people by unfettered socialism. And all of this is the result of a wise collective brain, titanic work, unbreakable will, and the unsurpassable organizational talent of the Communist Party and its Central Committee and Politburo...Under the Leadership of the Central Committee, our party and the State have actually continued to lead in the hard rebuttal of the aggressive machinations of Imperialism (i.e. America). The Communists and all the workers or the Sverdlovsk Central Committee (headed by Yeltsin until 4/85) assure the Congress delegates and Lenin's Central Committee that they will fight with their entire revolutionary fervor and give unswerving dedication tot he cause of the Communist Party."

 In July '90, the Kremlin script called for Yeltsin to resign from the Communist Party (as Shevardnadze and Gorbachev have now done) and Yeltsin is now referred to as a "Non-Communist Reformer." Yes, but he is still a hardcore Marxist-Leninist Revolutionary, an important distinction. At this writing he has become almost a total dictator over the Russian Republic (with its 150-million population). Yeltsin, like Gorbachev, Shevardnadze, and the reform (liberal) wing of the Communist Party, is totally dedicated to perestroika (a restructuring and reorganization of the Communist Party and the Soviet Union from top to bottom). Yeltsin is for purging hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats, aparatchiks, and the Nomenclature (the privileged one), not to terminate Communism, but to accelerate its thrust toward World Domination. He would go even further and faster than Gorbachev, hence the "alleged" rivalry between the two. Yeltsin is not against Gorbachev, nor against Communism. He is against the entrenched bureaucracy (and the stagnation it has begotten) which he and Gorbachev believe is self-serving, bloated, and slowing down the Communist's timetable for world revolution.

 When Yeltsin and Gorbachev talk about a multi-party system in the Soviet Union, they are talking about multiple Communist Parties all functioning within the Communist System. Hence, Yeltsin's pronouncement to found a new party "to the left" of the Communists. It will be anti-free enterprise, anti-capitalist, and hard-core Marxist- Leninist, but will use all the terminology of free markets, democracy, etc. In Russian politics and theater, there is the concept of the "liar" and the "liar's helper." Gorbachev is the liar, Yeltsin is the "liar's helper."

 Gorbachev, Shevardnadze, and Yeltsin are all actors in a dramatic stage play (like Hamlet or King Lear). The Soviets organize their politics according to a well-developed scenario which sometimes includes the death or permanent exist of the main hero. It helps to understand the plot, to understand the position and relationship among the actors, as well as the intended influence or impact upon the audience, the world. Nothing in the Soviet Union is accidental; the words, the stage, the violins, or the plot.

 The three actors described above are all reform minded, Liberal Marxist-Leninists (on the same side) with their handlers in the Central Committee of the CPSU, the KGB and the Soviet Military orchestrating the plot, its pace, and each new twist in the plot (i.e. the recent phoney coup/counter-coup, the termination, actually the renaming, of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the KGB and the USSR itself. Just as Western audiences are fascinated by the next episode of TV's "Dallas," so the Kremlin leaders plan to mesmerize and manipulate the West with the next act of Soviet political theater.

 The Ultimate Goal: To convince the West that Communism has collapsed in the USSR, that democracy has arrived, that massive U.S. (and Western) aid and disarmament should follow, and the integration of East and West (starting with Europe) should occur, by the mid-to late 1990s. There is word that the big three actors described above will be joined by others. Watch another rising star, Alexander Yakovlev, a close confidant of Gorbachev and Shevardnadze.

Communism - Part 43

 Soviet Disinformation

 Vladimir Lenin in 1921 stated: "Telling the truth is a bourgeois prejudice. Deception, on the other hand, is often justified by the goal." The present Soviet leadership has developed history's most comprehensive and Machiavellian plan to destabilize the West and defeat it through systematic deception.

 The Soviets have learned that the American People have a very short attention span; are easily seduced by Media-Generated illusion; find it easier to believe words (when pronounced with "sincerity") than deeds, even when the deeds contradict the words; and find it difficult to detect camouflage and deception.

 The Soviet leaders are presently creating The Illusion of peace, the death of Communism, the breakup of the empire, the demilitarization of the Soviet Union, democracy in the USSR, friendship with the West (and perhaps even economic collapse), while planning and perpetrating exactly the opposite.

 To facilitate this strategy of deception, the Soviet leaders (primarily via the KGB) utilize disinformation, the deliberate false portrayal of the true conditions and practices of the Communist World to elicit desired reactions from the non-Communist World.

 In periods of true weakness and crisis within the Communist world, the carefully crafted image is one of aggressive strength and expansion, and all Communist practice is geared to create that image. In periods of actual strength and solidarity within the Communist leadership, the system is portrayed as weak, struggling, transitional and open to cooperation with the Western family of nations.

 To wage ideological war against the West, Soviet disinformation-propaganda specialists concentrate on two kinds of studies. One is the study of Western people and their psychology. The other consists of developing a working method of using unnoticeable, subliminal propaganda for achieving victory in ideological, political and economic areas. The Soviets have mastered the art of telling Americans what they want to hear and making it believable!

 The Disinformation Network

 The Soviets have tens of thousands of KGB agents world-wide devoted specifically to disinformation and propaganda in the world media. Of tens of thousands of KGB agents in America, James Tyson in Target America estimates that about 2,000 function within the U.S. media. Tass, the Soviet official news (disinformation) agency, has bureaus in 126 countries, staffed almost exclusively by the KGB.

 The Novosti Press Agency has 3,000 employees around the world (mostly KGB) who feed information and reports into 4,000 information services worldwide. Novosti publishes thousands of books, 24 illustrated magazine (in 45 languages) in foreign countries around the world (12 in India alone). Novosti publishes magazines and newspapers (printed in Libya) in 32 different African countries and distributes millions of copies of books, newspapers and magazines in Europe and North America.

 The Soviets know that the best dissemination of propaganda lies in supplying properly edited TV news reels and newspaper galley proofs to Western media outlets. Westerners in turn are impressed that glasnost "allows" this and eagerly transmit or publish everything with no thought or question as to the validity of the material.

 The Tass News Agency is the outlet on which all the world relies for its information about the Soviet Union. Tass produces tens of thousands of Communiqu�s, magazine and news articles, programs and commentaries each year, which appear to be unbiased and objective, but which are in fact clever, sophisticated disinformation or propaganda pushing the present Soviet thinking, strategy, or manipulations. These are in turn fed into tens of thousands of Western and Third World media outlets and reach an audience of billions of unsuspecting people worldwide.

 This disinformation is virtually always what the Western (especially the American) audience wants to hear. Presently it dwells on the collapse of the Soviet economy, the dissolution of Communist parties, chaos in Eastern Europe, the end of communist regimes, the dissolution of the Soviet empire, etc. It is noteworthy that there is almost a total absence of any information on the Soviet Military. This is not by accident!!!

 Are the Soviets understating their economy as part of their "Feigned weakness/get Western Aid" Disinformation campaign?

 Statistics from a 1988 Soviet publication of world statistics comparing Soviet and U.S. production in a number of areas show amazing Soviet Economic Strength in a number of areas, strength that runs completely counter to all appearances that the USSR is a total economic basketcase. A few examples of Soviet versus American production numbers are worthy of reflection: Overall production is 80% of America's; crude oil production, 140%; natural gas production, 139% of America's; cast iron, 286%; steel, 214%; iron ore, 504%; mineral fertilizers, 162%; tractor units, 463%; cement, 168%; cotton fabrics, 293%; woolen fabrics, 515%; universities and colleges, 83%; number of physicians, 218%; beds in hospitals, 369%. The Soviet grain production have been vastly Understated.

 We have been led to believe that the Soviets are technical-industrial- financial buffoons. But more than half of the engineers in the world live in the Soviet Union. The average Soviet university graduate is far better educated than the average U.S. university graduate today, something most Americas would not like to admit. The Soviets produce 2 1/2 to 3 times more world patents per year than Americans. They already have a powerhouse based on "plasma" (not blood), a self-generating powerhouse like the sun.

 The Soviets built the first nuclear power plant. Chernobyl happened because it was Much Older than our nuclear power plants. The Soviets built the world's first nuclear powered icebreaker in the 1950s. They are presently deploying a Star Wars-type space-based defense system that America has chosen not to build. They have an operational space station in outer space, for military purposes. America cannot afford to put one up. They have an operational rocket that lifts a 100-ton payload into outer space versus a 32-ton maximum rocket payload America can lift (a 3 to 1 edge in lifting capacity). they have built the largest military air transport in the world, far larger than America's C5A Galaxy. They even developed America's favorite video game, Nintendo.

 They build a nuclear submarine worth $3-billion a copy every six weeks that is as good as any American can turn out. Their weapons industry is 5-10 times the size of our own, turns out weapons that in many instances are as sophisticated as ours and in 5 to 6 times the quantity of our own. In areas where they are technologically behind America, they beg, borrow, steal or are given by the West what they need.

 Financially they may not be the incompetents we perceive them to be either, in that they always best us price wise on large commodities deals, they are actually very sophisticated market operators (or manipulators).

 When they sell gold (as the world's third largest producer) they sell into strength to maximize their profits. The Soviet economy is actually less vulnerable to the coming depression in the West than our own because they do not have a huge internal debt pyramid to collapse as we do (America's is 15 trillion and rising). Most Soviet debt is international, owed to the West!

Communism - Part 44

 Furthermore, a major deflationary economic (or price) collapse in the Soviet Union is unlikely because the government owns everything and controls all prices. People will not be dumping assets or investments to get liquid, they don't own any! The Soviets are not major exporters, they consume most of their production. But they are major importers, and import prices will drop sharply in a depression. The Soviet Economy will be relatively insulated from a Western Global Depression.

 What's The Point? Sun Tsu, the Chinese military strategist (whom the Soviet leaders idolize) said:  "When at your pinnacle of strength, feign weakness."  The Soviets May Not Be at their pinnacle of economic strength (they never have been) but neither are they the economic basket-case or technical/industrial/financial incompetents which Soviet disinformation portrays them to be.

 As a few of the above facts would seem to indicate, they may be far stronger economically, industrially, technologically and scientifically than we have been led to believe. One highly respected Soviet-born Sovietologist believes that the primary motive behind the Soviets seeking massive Western financial aid is Not need, as much as the desire to destroy the fragile U.S. and Western economies by over stretching our resources. A hundred billion or more in international loans to the USSR suddenly defaulted upon could also help to precipitate a financial collapse in the West.

 The Soviets Are, however, at their pinnacle of military strength (their current "seeming" political upheaval notwithstanding) and that strength versus the West's is growing every day. General Douglas MacArthur once said: " is most dangerous to underestimate your enemy."  Is it possible that the Soviet disinformation and Western gullibility about the true conditions in the USSR is causing America and the West to dangerously underestimate Soviet military, industrial, and technical strength and to overestimate our own? Are the Soviets carefully crafting the "buffoon" image? Are they really "dumb like foxes?"

 One good rule for Soviet watchers when considering Soviet disinformation is to assume that almost everything is the opposite of what it appears to be. Another rule to remember is, that if you own the guns, you still own the country!

 The Soviet Pseudo Coup - Soviet Theater at its Best

 On Monday, August 19, Mikhail Gorbachev was ostensibly overthrown in a so-called coup by military, KGB and Communist Party "hardliners" not satisfied with the results of his glasnost/perestroika reform program. Within three days, the coup fell apart, the eight coup leaders were arrested, and Gorbachev was restored to power.

 While the Communist and world press as well as Bush and other Western leaders trumpeted the genuineness of the coup and counter/coup, as has been previously shown in part, There were some very strange aspects to the entire affair that cause many to conclude that the coup was staged:

 1). The U.S. and world press warned about the coming coup for several days leading up to August 19. Seldom is the World Press given advance notice of such events. Western intelligence sources knew of the coup several months in advance. Also curious was the fact that in spite of the advance publicity of the coup, Gorbachev made no moves to head it off or avert it.

 2). All of the eight coup leaders were Gorbachev appointees and confidants.

 3). Coup leader Gennady Yanayev referred to himself only as "acting president" and spoke of Gorbachev returning to power after recovering from "his illness."

 4). The coup leaders did not cut the internal or international communication lines, something which is always done in a coup or revolutionary upheaval.

 5). The coup leaders made no attempt to control the press, neither the Soviet nor the foreign press stationed in Russia, which had complete access to international phone lines throughout the coup.

 6). Anti-coup leaders such as Yeltsin had access to International Phone Lines and Operators throughout the coup.

 7). Only a minimal number of troops were used throughout the coup, and troops loyal to Yeltsin were sent to surround Yeltsin in the Parliament Building.

 8). The airports were all left open.

 9). Water, electricity and phone lines in the Parliament building were never cut.

 10). In a legitimate coup, the KGB would have killed Yeltson, Gorbachev and other reform leaders. But no attempt was even made to arrest Yeltsin, but the coup plotters did arrest Godiyan, a well-known enemy of Gorbachev's.

 The president of Soviet Georgia came out shortly after the coup and accused Gorbachev of having master-minded it, and 62% of the Soviet people (according to private polls) believe the coup was a fake. Even Eduard Shevardnadze (Gorbachev's former foreign minister) said that Gorby may have been behind the coup. It is certain that Gorbachev and the Soviet Leadership had much to gain from a pseudo or staged coup:

 1). If Gorbachev could be seen as wrestling control of the nation from reactionaries and restoring constitutional authority, his popularity and legitimacy among the people might rise.

 2). It was hoped that the coup and counter coup would quiet the restive Soviet people, holding out hope for improvement of their living conditions.

 3). The coup and counter-coup would raise the credibility of the Soviet reform-Democracy-Glasnost-Perestroika movement in Western eyes, opening up the flood gates for even more financial and high tech aid. The Bush's of the world could say: "See, our good friend Gorbachev and the Soviet forces of democracy just 'dodged the hardliner's bullet,' now we really have to help them if we want to see democracy and reform succeed and survive."

 4). The coup was to remind the West how wonderful Gorby really is. He was losing credibility due to his huge military buildup, his killing of people in the Baltics, etc. After the coup, he could blame all these indiscretions on the "hardliners."

 5). The "restoration of democracy" to the Soviet Union and the "demise of the hardliners" is now an excuse for the West to accelerate its disarmament and for the globalists in America, Europe, and the Soviet Union to accelerate the merger into the New World Order.

 6). The coup and counter-coup are an excuse to launch a long overdue purge of hundreds of thousands of inefficient Communist Party, KGB or Government Bureaucrats, tens of thousands of whom will be shot or imprisoned. And without notice by the controlled press in America. This purging (or cleansing) of the Party has been done periodically since 1917. It is like pruning a grape vine or (fig tree) rose bush to make it stronger. A huge Communist Party Purge is now underway in the Soviet Union.

 7). The coup and counter-coup would be the excuse for reorganizing and renaming the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the KGB and the USSR itself. This strategy of reorganizing, restructuring, and streamlining the Soviet Union from top to bottom has been on the drawing boards for several years. Under the impetus (or smoke-screen) of the coup and counter-coup, this restructuring will now be done in one huge quantum jump.

 8). Another goal of the coup/counter-coup was to raise Boris Yeltsin to "superstar status" so that he could be thrust into leadership of the people did not rally around Gorbachev. Soviet theater always has an understudy for the star ready to be brought on state at a moment's notice!

Communism - Part 45

 It appears that the eight leaders of the coup (Kryuchkov, Yazov, Pavlov, Pugo, Yanayev, Baklanov, Starodubtsev and Tizyakov) were enticed into setting up the coup (which they may have believed was genuine). They were set up, entrapped and then double-crossed. Pugo is said to have committed suicide, but was more likely murdered. The remaining seven will be tried, imprisoned or shot. This is the Communist way, to double-cross and liquidate their own top leadership when they deem it necessary or desirable! They overthrew and killed Trotsky (in Mexico); they purged and executed Bukharin (Lenin's closest associate and a "hero of the Revolution") in 1936 because he would not support Stalin's perestroika in '36 and '37; and they executed Beria (head of the NKVD) in 1956. Dryuchkov and friends may well suffer a similar fate, sacrificed for the long-term good of the Party. And the sacrifice of Kryuchkov, Yazov, Pugo, Pavlov, etc. (who apparently walked into a trap) lends immense credibility to the whole Coup-Counter-Coup Scheme.

 Historical Precedent: There are numerous precedents for purges, duplicity, double-crosses, and brutal executions in Soviet history since 1917. But there is also a precedent for a pseudo-coup in Russian history in 1564 when Ivan the Terrible was Czar. Ivan became distraught over his inability to remake Russia in his image. The ruling class (the old guard) tried to thwart him at every turn.

 Ivan also believed that the ruling class had murdered (poisoned) his wife Anastasia. So, he packed up as if to go on his vacation, and once he reached his destination, he sent word to the ruling class elite that he was abdicating the throne. This sent a shockwave of fear through the ruling class. The peasants would revolt and they would not get any help from Ivan's merchant class followers. So they sent word to Ivan, "come back, please!" He replied, "I will, but on MY conditions." they thought about and then decided it was the lesser of evils. Ivan returned to the throne and he renewed his reform efforts with much less resistance from the ruling class.

  Note: One thing seems to have gone wrong with the phony coup/counter-coup. The Soviet people were supposed to rally around Gorbachev. They did not! Many saw through the charade, and most would simply not forgive his six years of despotism. So, it could become advantageous to move Yeltsin and/or Shevardnaze to center stage. But remember, both are hardcore Marxist-Leninists cut out of the same cloth as Gorbachev. As the French proverb says, "the more it changes, the more it remains the same."

 Reorganizing and Restructuring the Soviet Empire: "We are not going to change Soviet power, of course, or abandon its fundamental principles, but we acknowledge the need for changes that will strengthen Socialism." (M. Gorbachev, Perestroika)

 The Western media has been filled with headlines over the post month that the Soviet Empire is disintegrating, that Communism and socialism are abandoned and dead at last, that the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the KGB are being dismantled, disbanded and relegated to the "dust bin of history." Certainly the demise of the "gang of eight," the rise of Yeltsin to power, the official condemnation of the CPSU and KGB, and the independence of many of the Soviet republics would all seem to signal the end of the "evil empire." But looks can be deceptive and so can the Marxist-Leninist dialectic.

 The Soviet Empire is Not Disintegrating as the Western press and leaders keep telling us. It is restructuring, rearranging, reorganizing, streamlining, purging the deadwood, and rearming preparatory to its final thrust for world domination over the next five to ten years. As Gorbachev said in 1989: "Through restructuring (perestroika) we want to give Socialism a second wind. To achieve this, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union returns to the origins and principles of the Bolshevik Revolution, to the Leninist ideas about the construction of a new society."

 And in 1987 Gorbachev said: "In October 1917, we parted with the old world, rejecting it once and for all. We are moving toward a new world, the world of Communism. We shall never turn off that road."

 Does this sound like a man who is presiding over the death of Communism? The Lenin whom Gorbachev worships, quoting Sun Tsu, said: "We advance through retreat...when we are weak, we boast of strength, and when we are strong, we feign weakness."

 The old dialectic Leninist doctrine of taking two steps forward and then one back to confuse your enemies is certainly being applied by his disciple, Gorbachev, today. It is called "scientific socialism" by the faithful, and of course Gorbachev has said that he does not want to discard socialism but renew, restructure and strengthen it. It should be remembered that all present changes in the Soviet Union are within the framework of Socialism.

 Abolishing The Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the KGB: The Soviets are Not abolishing the CPSU or the KGB, they are renaming them, reorganizing them, purging them of inefficient deadwood, and Expanding Their Mission.

 1). The KGB: Has had six name changes since 1917:

The KGB: Has Had
Six Name Changes Since 1917

 All of these name changes were accompanied by purges (where thousands of heads at the top rolled), by restructuring or reorganization, by an expansion of the role of the secret police and by public pronouncements that the secret police had been abolished.

 In the 1950s Beria, the brutal and infamous head the NKVD, was purged and executed. Vladimir Kryuchkov (head of the KGB until the recent phoney coup and counter-coup) has similarly been removed and will probably be shot to make the coup-counter-coup seem more genuine.

 The KGB has about 1.5 million members worldwide, with about 50,000 sequestered in the U.S. KGB military units will now be moved under the Soviet army command (the new KGB will fall under the Soviet military command), and tens of thousands of inefficient KGB bureaucrats will be sacked (or worse).

 This is not being done to destroy the KGB but to make it stronger, more efficient, lean and mean so-to-speak. It was seen to be becoming fat, dumb, lazy, and bloated. Just as the Rumanian secret police, the Securitate (which was 50,000 strong under Ceausescu) continues to operate in a Romania which is allegedly non-Communist, but still is dominated by the Communists, so the KGB will continue to function in the USSR, which will be allegedly non-Communist, but still dominated by the Communists.

 Russia Is Still Controlled By The Jews

 If we dig a little deeper we further confirm the conclusion that the power behind the Kremlin is still Jewish. We must also understand that it was Jewish personnel who built the Soviet bureaucracy. It is theirs. Opinion Magazine, published by the late Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, a Zionist leader, stated in its December, 1933 issue that 61 percent of the officials of the White Russian bureaucracy (which was the major section of the bureaucracy) were Jews. ("...A Jew is commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Army; a Jew is President of the State Bank; Jews occupy almost all important ambassadorial positions of the Soviet Union; the universities, professions, judiciary and administration have now a greater percentage of Jews, than any other nationality." The rabbi's magazine added: "Anti-Semitism has been declared a state offense and is punished as counter-revolution (with death).")

 Drew Middleton, back from Moscow after years there as the New York Times correspondent, had a long article in the New York (and Los Angeles) Times in February, 1948, in which he said that only then had the Kremlin begun admitting as many non-Jews as Jews to the professional schools for training for positions in the bureaucracy. Analyze that statement. It means that even today half or more than half of all employees in the bureaucracy are Jews; in a land where Jews constitute less than three percent of the population.

 The bureaucracy, the secret-police, the press, the finance, the policy shaping and policy executing machinery; all are Jewish creations and the Jews look on them as their private possession. If any force in Russia were to threaten to rip them loose form this political and military power machine the Jews would call for help from all over the world. In America their kinsmen would storm the radio, television, movies, newspapers, magazines and every other media outlet, to inflame Americans against what would be described as the "anti-Semitic," "fascist" Russians. If the threat in Russia became serious a civil war would break out there. For the Jews have the Red bear by the tail, and they have beaten and kicked all the Christian sentiment and tolerance out of it; never again will they dare turn loose of its tail. If they ever lose their grip they will be wiped out, and they are keenly conscious of this fact.

Communism - Part 46

 No, there has been no serious loss of power by the Jews in the land of the "people's democracy." Such a loss as they have suffered has been only in the nature of compromises with the rising tide of anti-Semitism, in a time when the imminence of war makes it inadvisable to liquidate more millions of Russians. The compromises were some what illustrated years ago by the Truman administration of Henry Morgenthau, as a political expediency, soon after the war, when Americanism began to rise.

 The very highest offices and most powerful concealed positions are held by Jews or men married to Jews. For instance the early names you are probably familiar with were Rakosi who ruled Hungary, Ana Pauker ruled Roumania, Slansky ruled Czechoslovakia, Ashberg was the banker; Kaganovich was the dictator over all the vast industrial cities of slave labor.

 These Were The Rulers: John Gunther, for years friendly to the left wing and granted interviews with the highest Communists, wrote in his "Behind the Curtain," 1949: "...(Rakosi) is in a way the most interesting personality I met all summer. His name is Matyas Rakosi, he is the Deputy Prime Minister and undisputed boss of of the most efficient and diabolically subtle as well as thorough-minded men I ever met...Rakosi is not merely a Hungarian Communist; his is one of the half dozen most important international Communists in the world today, because of his prestige and influence almost everywhere in the Soviet orbit, from Moscow to Pieping. Mr. Rakosi was born in 1892, in a Hungarian village called Ada; he is of Jewish origin and the family name was Rosencranz..."

 Reports from numerous sources within the past have told of the Jewish character of the secret police and the bureaus, and of the government corporations by which the ruling clique took all business from the Hungarians, eliminating competition. This trend illustrated what appears to be the final development if Communism should sweep the world: all non-Jewish competitors would be eliminated, the state owning everything, setting up gigantic corporations with its preferred people in charge, the International Bankers manipulating the finance. Communism thus becomes Zionist, or Jewish state capitalism. Which we can see being formed in America today. We found also in Communist Hungary that while Protestants and Catholics have suffered severe persecution under Jewish rule, the rabbis carry on without interference. Many observers, including some Jews, have reported that rabbis and synagogues were never disturbed in Communist Russia. While it was prohibited to teach religion to young people, the Jews did so by their home worship.

 "The Communists are against religion (Christianity), and they seek to destroy religion; yet, when we look deeper into the nature of Communism, we see that it is essential nothing else than a religion (Judaism)." (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 138)

 The Jewishness of Ana Pauker and her triumph over the Rumanians were told in Time Magazine: "...(Ana Pauker) lives in three great houses, moving almost every night because she fears assassins." One of her houses belonged to Prince Brancoveanu. One belonged to Nicolae Malaxa, a big industrialist and speculator. And one belonged to the red-haired Magada Lupescu, ex-King Carol's mistress and later his wife.

 "Ana replaced them all. The power of the aristocrats, the industrialists, the royal playboys and the royal concubines has passed into her hands. She runs Roumania...Her sway extends beyond Romania's 92,000 square miles and its 16.5 million people. She is the leading Communist in the band of states running from the Baltic to the Adriatic...Ana Pauker was born (1893) in Bucharest, where her father, Zvi Rabinsohn, i.e, the man who kills animals in accordance with Jewish rules (Ana's father moved to Palestine after the war)...ana went to the Jewish school on Anton Pan Street...
 Through seven huge Sovroms (Soviet-Romanian combines) the Russians almost completely control transport, oil, timber, banking and everything else they can lay their hands on, even including Roumania's tiny motion picture industry...A recent visitor described Bucharest as a 'city with the air of a pawnshop.'" (Time Magazine, September 20, 1948)

 How could the Time writer have made his point more plain? How is it possible for Americans not see what they read? (A person shopping in a Jewish store for books exposing the Jewish revolutions against our people, asked the sales lady why she would sell such books to non-Jews. She said without hesitation, "Goyim don't see what they read.") Here was the full picture of the triumph of the Jew over the Rumanians, ousting their king, their industrial leaders, even their little store owners, wiping out all competition, killing the Christian leaders, intimidating and suppressing the thunder-struck, frightened people; yet how many Time readers realized that it was a Jewish triumph? Small wonder the Jewish strategists speak of us as the "stupid goyim." "Gunther's Behind the Curtain" confirmed that Slansky, secretary-general of the Communist Party in Czechoslovakia, is Jewish. Gunther described him as the strong man of that country.

 Was Stalin Jewish? Jacob Berman a former secretary-general of the Polish Communist Party and the dictator over "liberated" Poland. (When Berman became the strong-man over Poland, Walter Winchell made the announcement on his Sunday evening propaganda broadcast. The statement stood entirely alone, without explanation. It seemed that his purpose in making the announcement was to inform his enormous Jewish radio audience that their kinsmen had triumphed over the hated, intensely-Christian Poles. His boastful announcement was safe, for not one White American in a thousand suspected the racial identity of Berman (or even Walter Winchell, for that matter)) In July, 1950, both Jewish and general-circulation newspapers carried stories that |Marshal Konstantin Rokossovsky, who was put in charge of Police operations some months earlier, was anti-Semitic and "reportedly" had removed Berman and also from East Germany, Gerhardt Eisler, with several other high Jewish officials. But a subsequent dispatch in some Jewish papers said that these Jews "reportedly" had been called back to Moscow. Note that both series of reports, the original and the later, qualifying reports, were given as hearsay. Robert Williams questioned a number of non-Jewish readers and found that all who saw the article had the impression that there was some mistreatment of Jews behind the Iron Curtain. It is so easy for the strategists, using their infiltrees into the press and radio, to make our people believe what they want us to believe, especially since we are virtually unable to reply with the full facts in this land which idealizes (sic) freedom of the press.

 It seems probable that this is no more than the long expected move to make the Poles and Germans feel that Communism is losing its Jewishness. Germany is the balance of power between the East and the West; the Communists must have Germany if they are to conquer the world. Therefore thy may go to great lengths, even liquidating a few conspicuous Jews, or reporting them liquidated, even risking the temporary bafflement and defection of the Jewish masses in the West; in order to deceive and win the Germans. Later they can easily win back the Jewish masses. It worked perfectly, as we know from our study of history over the past few decades. Meanwhile, of course Berman and Eisler was able to issue orders to their respective charges from Moscow as readily as Eisler issued orders for all Communist operations in the Western Hemisphere from a hideout in New York City. (A month after the original propaganda stores appeared, the name of Eisler came through in news dispatches from Europe in connection with Communist operating in East Germany; but one may wonder whether this mention, in small type, erased the impression in the mind of the American people, who even bothered to notice, that Jews were being mistreated by Rokossovsky)

 In Russia proper the two most powerful front men, Stalin and Molotov, were married to Jewesses. Stalin's wife (his third) was the sister of Kaganovich, the Jewish Commissar of Heavy Industries and dictator over all the great industrial cities of slave labor. (It has been estimated that |Kaganovich worked 15 to 20 million non-Jews. He employed many of his kinsmen in his bureaucracy, but he does not enslave Jews) There was increasing suspicion that Stalin himself was Jewish. He had always been considered a Semitic-Mongoloid mixture, perhaps non-Jewish. Many Jews, however, believed him to be one of them, and a columnist in the Los Angeles B'nai B'rith Messenger, March 3, 1950, col. 2, p. 5 wrote: "A former Soviet general claims that Joseph Stalin is of Jewish ancestry."

 Many White Russians who fled the Bolsheviki say Stalin was a Jew. One, a captain in the Czar's armies, stated that he knew Stalin in their boyhood and that Stalin's father (Djugashvili) was "a Jewish cobbler."

Communism - Part 47

 Molotov's wife was the sister of Sam Karp (The name is often misspelled Carp) of Karp Export and Import Co., Bridgeport, Conn. Molotov's daughter, therefore, is a Jew (for a half-Jew is a Jew). Molotov will not turn against his own daughter, unless absolutely necessary.

 Mr. Ashberg, who was known throughout the banking world as a Jewish financier at the Nia Banken in Sweden before the Bolshevik Revolution, and was reported by Edgar Sisson as having arrive in Russia two months after the successful "October Revolution," remained in Russia and was the banker for the U.S.S.R. The London Evening Star reported a visit by Ashberg to Switzerland: "...for secret meetings with Swiss government officials and banking executives. Diplomatic circles describe Mr. Ashberg as 'the Soviet Banker' who advanced large sums to Lenin and Trotsky in 1917. At the time of the revolution, Mr. Ashberg gave Trotsky money to form and equip the first unit of the Red Army. A spokesman of the Soviet Legation in Berne said 'Mr. Ashberg's visit will be private. He has property in Switzerland...'

 The financial attach� of the Soviet Legation described Mr. Ashberg as 'the most unusual man the Kremlin has ever sent to the West. He bears no official title, is attached to no government department, is not in the Soviet Foreign Service and is not a member of the Cominform.'"

 Note that Banker/Communist Ashberg was even permitted to own property, and in a capitalist nation. Non-Jewish bankers; competitors of Jewish finance, were liquidated as capitalists soon after the revolution. Hardly anyone in the Soviet apparatus is more powerful than the banker. Hardly any Communist is more influential than Rakosi, Ana Pauker, Stalin or Molotov; all Jews or married to Jews. It need hardly be reiterated, therefore, that no power as yet has seriously threatened the Jews behind the Kremlin. They still manage what their spokesman chose to call the "huge flock of Russian sheep" and it is still the racial element which makes Communism so destructive to the Russians.

 Zionism and the Anti-Defamation League - The Secret Government of the United States: Three past eminent Jews, Senator Herbert H. Lehman (Banker/Zionist Lehman promoted a fantastic movement called Crusade for Freedom, which enlisted many good men and many old time Communist Hard Liners, such as the Jewish movie producer, Walter Wanger (put in charge of the Los Angeles division). A spokesman said the organization had no intention of opposing the Truman-Acheson policies. Drew Pearson was plugging it over radio. Obviously it was a deceptive move, not really bent on combatting Communism. What it contemplated was the building of five huge short-wave propaganda stations in Europe and Asia. In the hands of International Banker Lehman and associated Communists, this gigantic project moved the masses of Europe and Asia to please its planners. Lehman's spokesmen, for example, were able to keep Russian troops from surrendering en masses to our armies by merely making them believe that the Kremlin had turned against Jews, while Jews in America live like kings. If the long-oppressed Russians believed the Kremlin at last was on their side against Jewish power, they would fight to the death for Russia. If they ever find out how powerfully and dangerously entrenched the Jewish revolutionaries were in America, they would not dare surrender to our armies. After all, it was American troops who, under New Deal orders, forcibly drove back to Russian police, several million Russian refugees just after the war. Russians have not forgotten this mass crime.

 If Lehman's Crusade for Freedom had not been broken up it would have sweeped the world like a hurricane, adding the final triumph of the world revolution, through a "United Nations World Government," a dictatorship by a handful of men responsible to no one. this Crusade was promoting the naive, power-minded and Jewish Eisenhower, who evidently was marked to become the first dictator, or figurehead. The Board of the UN would perhaps (and does today) be such men as Banker Ashberg of the USSR, Banker Lehman and Strategist Frankfurter, Zionist Ben Gurion from Israel, Rakoski from the Communist International and James P. Warburg who is promoting and helping finance the United World Federalists (whose uncle helped finance Trotsky). The Crusade is a private international machine. Why will the government permit it to rise and take over the business of propaganda from the military?

 Is there any doubt that the Jewish plans have almost succeeded in the United States today?), International Banker, Mr. Justice Felix Frankfurter of the United States Supreme Court and Mr. Henry Morgenthau, Jr., former Secretary of the Treasury, were pictured on page one of the Chicago Tribune, May 29, 1950, with the statement: "A person with highest State Department connections identified these three figures as the secret government of the United States. Frankfurter was pictured as the most powerful man in the government, reaching into the White House with his proteges." David K. Niles, a Marxist formerly associated with Frankfurter and the late English Jewish revolutionary, Harold Laski, at Ford Hall Fourm in Boston, was named as "administrative assistant at the White House. Niles owes his government connection to Frankfurter."

 It was Mr. Morgenthau who, inspired by his assistant in the Treasury Department, the late Harry Dexter White, born Weitt, sold the Morgenthau plan to Roosevelt and Eisenhower. This plan was to keep on destroying Germans, principally by the starvation process, after the fighting stopped. About one million German soldiers were starved to death under the orders of the Jewish American President Dwight Eisenhower. It made the German hate America so violently that it is now a question whether we can expect them to help us in a time of need. Evidently Mr. white and Mr. Morgenthaou wanted to make the German people hate us so that they would side with Communist Russia at some point in the future.

 Morgenthau also, gave a set of U.S. occupation money dies to the Communist Army in 1944, after which the U.S. Treasury had to redeem hundreds of millions of dollars worth of occupation marks, indistinguishable from our own civilians, including thousands of Jews who were sent into the U.S. zone for political purposes.

 These Jewish strategists are not known as Communists; they are known as Zionists. They even mouth anti-Russian sentiments, as the pressure grows. But do not be fooled: they and the scores of Jewish organizations across the nation which they influence, whose vote and propaganda power throughout the press and radio gave them the support needed condemn the House Committee on un-American Activities, condemn loyalty oaths, condemn as anti-Semites and reactionaries and hate-spreaders all those who, like Senator McCarthy, attempted to expose Communism. Zionism with its international finance constitutes the real power behind the world revolution. Many foolish American will deny that there is a conspiracy for a world revolution, but they speak through ignorance.

 This does not mean that all the Jews in this and other Western countries are wilfully bent on destroying their respective host countries. It seems that it is principally their leaders, the master minds, who are reaching for complete power to be had, only, if the rugged White Race (the True Israelites) can be subjugated or destroyed. For the most part, the Jewish masses seem to have been enlisted only in a step-by-step progressive destruction of our traditions, interests and rights, as they so often have been used by the rabbis and rabble rousers and Jewish financial kings throughout known history. And, even if all of the Jewish leaders in the world were suddenly destroyed, the blood line of Esau would rise up others to take their place.

 Haw many rank and file Jews foresaw that immigration and the destruction of racial segregation and the imposition of Affirmative Action laws across America; all under Jewish pressure and demands, would lead to further denial of rights to the Whites and the eventual outbreeding and destruction of the White Race, is a matter of conjecture. Their understanding of the race problem, the uniformity of their reaction to political and social situations never cease to amaze us, as we watch events unfold. Whatever theories it offers gullible people, Communism in practice turns out to be the domination of the Whites by racial and social minorities under Jewish direction leading to the liquidation of Christianity and the "leadership class," the producers and defenders, of our race. Those who support the destructive measures against us contribute to our disintegration, whatever their motives may be.

Communism - Part 48

 Frankfurter, the Boss: It behooves us to study this man further, as he was one of the most destructive of the Zionists who served on the Supreme Court of the United States. He was the son of an Austrian revolutionary, brought to America at the age of 12, Felix Frankfurter proved to be the leading master mind behind the revolution in this innocent, naive republic.

 It has long been known that, while a professor at Harvard Law School, he indoctrinated hundreds of young Americans, Jews and non-Jews, with Marxism, and later succeeded in planting "hundreds of happy hot dogs" in key government positions. The late General Hugh Johnson, who for a time was one of the New Deal appointees closet to the Jewish President Franklin D. Roosevelt, resigning in alarm at the trend of the government, revealed the Frankfurter strategy and exposed much of his already-powerful net, in a series of four articles in Red Book Magazine in 1938.

 After Frankfurter had built his net of friends and former students, it was easy enough for him to appear pro-American, while his agents spread confusion throughout the government, advancing government ownership and controls, throwing China to the Communists, Poland, the Baltic states, East Germany, part of Austria, part of Manchuria, half of Korea to the Communists, preventing shipments of arms to South Korea and blocking efforts to strengthen West Germany as a desperately needed ally.

 The convicted Communist, Alger Hiss, and his good friend Dean Acheson, were both favorites of Frankfurter, who disgraced the Supreme Court by stepping down to testify for Hiss. Many papers, including some Jewish, showed the influence of Frankfurter over the New Deal. Frank C. Waldrop reported the following incident in his column in the Washington Times-Herald: "In January, 1933, just before the first inauguration of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Dr. J.B. Matthews, then a Communist (but later one of the most capable advisers of the House anti-Communist Committee) was circulating a petition urging recognition of Soviet Russia. When Matthews sent someone to get the signature of Felix Frankfurter, the then professor at Harvard Law School sent back word to stop circulating the petition, that he, Frankfurter, 'had the President-elect in his vest pocket and could guarantee recognition.'" (Washington Times-Herald, June 5, 1950)

 Note that this was a Communist petition and that it was Professor Frankfurter who had the power, without so much as asking Moscow, to stop the circulation of the petition, when he himself had accomplished the Communist objective by other methods. Frankfurter was one of the founders of the American Civil Liberties Union, defender of Communists, perverts, Queers, and every other type of degenerate known to man, in the courts, and became an active Zionist office holder and committeeman as early as 1917.

 In the early days of his career  before he had built a machine to do the work for him. Frankfurter was openly Communistic. He led a rabble in defense of Sacco and Vanzetti, Communists eventually executed. He was attorney for the Russian-American Industrial Corporation which was set up to organize and finance the textile industry in Russia after the 1917 Bolshevik victory. Sidney Hillman and other notorious Communists were among the organizers of the corporation, whose purpose was not to make a profit but to help the new Communist government stabilize its economy until it could take over the textile industry.

 After investigating a Communist-inspired labor riot and counter-action by police in Bisbee, Arizona, Frankfurter wrote a report to President Wilson so biased that ex-President Theodore Roosevelt (another former President who was Jewish), in a personal letter to the young revolutionary, accused him of taking "on bhalf of the administration an attitude which seems to be fundamentally that of Trotsky and the other Bolsheviki leaders in Russia; an attitude which may be fraught with mischief to this country...Your report is as thoroughly misleading a document as could be written on the are engaged in excusing men precisely like the Bolsheviki in Russia, who are murderers and the encouragers of murder..." This letter was simply a deception to make the goyim to think that the Jews were against Russia.

 Frankfurter was later acknowledged by friend and foe alike to be the master of the U.S. State Department, using notably Dean Acheson and Phillip Jessup (While America's tax money, through the Marshall Plan, which later became known as "Point Four - to develop backward areas all over the world" supposedly are to help the colonial areas and small nations resist Communism, Jessup, long-time Communist Party liner, showed his disloyalty in a statement quoted by the Associated Press from Pakistan, February 28: "Indochina is progressing toward wiping out the last ties of colonialism...Full independence of Vietnam will not be assured until French troops are withdrawn." French troops are, of course, the only major force preventing Communist "independence" rebels from capturing Vietnam. Jessup, a character witness for Alger Hiss, obviously is using U.S. tax money to aid the Communists in the "backward areas.") to shape American foreign policy to the interests of the world revolution, stripping us of allies, preventing adoption of a forthright program such as aid to the anti-Communist underground of the Soviet dominated countries. Frankfurter is quoted as having said to a small group of friends: "The real rulers of nations are undiscoverable."

 Representative Jenkins of Ohio seriously questioned (in a speech on the House floor, August 30, 1950) whether the President actually is "strong enough to rid himself and the country of Dean Acheson and his tribe."

 Alger Hiss, convicted of having sworn falsely in denying that he had given classified documents to a Communist agent, admitted to a Congressional committee that it was Frankfurter who got him into a high government office. After Hiss' conviction, Acheson reaffirmed his faith in Hiss. Acheson follows the same policies as those approved by Hiss, the Communist. How then can Acheson be a loyal American? Acheson is in almost daily contact with Frankfurter, taking walks with him or receiving telephone calls from him. Official Washington recognizes both Hiss and Acheson as agents of the Frankfurter policies. How then can Frankfurter have been anything but a Communist? (Now years after the death of Frankfurter it is known that among others found to have been Communists, indoctrinated by Frankfurter at Harvard Law School and later placed in key government positions, were Lee Pressman, John Abt and Nathan Witt. Max Lowenthal, close associate of Niles and Truman, were uncovered by the House Committee on Un-American Activities as a highly influential Communist, also was a Frankfurter underling. Lowenthal must have had inside information before the stock marked crash in 1929; which prepared the situation for the advent of the Jewish/Communist New Deal, for while White Americans were going bankrupt, he made millions in a few days, selling short)

 As Assistant Secretary of State during the war, Acheson, Hiss and their companions, Service, Lattimore and others later identified in the Amerasia spy case, advanced the Moscow line that the Chinese Communists were only agrarian reformers, not Communists. Acheson continued to frustrate American efforts to help Nationalist China and now insists that Chiang's last base of operations, Formosa, was of no strategic value; that we should not bother to defend it. (MacArthur, America's foremost military strategist, held that if we let Formosa fall we will find the Pacific coast threatened)

 Frankfurter Agents Sabotaged the U.S.: Senator Joseph McCarthy submitted to the President sworn statements of four persons to the effect that they, with four others, were employed in Acheson's department for six months, during 1946, destroying all evidence of Communist sympathies in the loyalty files on scores of State Department employees.

 It was the Acheson-Hiss clique who engineered Roosevelt's give-away program at Yalta (but Roosevelt had little care for selling out America and the Eastern European nations for the Jews are the most traitorous people of all, they will even sell out each oyher for money and power), which built the Soviet power so rapidly. It was the same clique who induced President Truman at Potsdam to permit Stalin to divide Korea at the 38th parallel, and the same clique which consistently prevented America from either getting entirely out of Asia or re-arming the South Koreans to defend themselves. Acheson's excuse was that to rearm the South Koreans might inspire them to attack the North Korean Communists. Why did he not want the South Koreans and the Nationalist Chinese to attack the Communists?

 "But the Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism." (A Program for the Jews and Humanity,  Harry Waton, pp. 143-144.)

horizontal rule

Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3)

horizontal rule

     "When all government, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the Center of all Power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated."

1821- In a letter to Gideon Granger.
Writings of Thomas Jefferson.

Click Here if you would like a hard copy of any of Willie Martin's books

Jew Watch - Willie Martin

horizontal rule