NEA Is Anti-Christian
Parts 1 through 8
By Willie Martin

Jew Watch

NEA Is Anti-Christian - Part 1

 The NEA's (National Educational Association) Anti-Christian and Anti-American Agenda Threatens Our Nation!

 Have you wondered what is happening to our children? Have you wondered what has gone wrong with our educational system, because the young cannot read or comprehend what they are reading any more. Have you wondered why they cannot make change at the stores you shop at, but must rely on the cash registers, or on adding machines?
Well read on and you will find out what has happened, and it should make you mad; it should make you so disgusted you can hardly sleep at night.

 Do you know who said: "Allegiance to a nation is the biggest stumbling block to the creation of International Government. National boundaries and the concept of sovereignty must be abolished. The quickest way to do this is to condition the young to another and broader alliance. Opinion favorable to International Government will be developed in the social studies in the public schools."

 Were those the words of an Alger Hiss, or some other well-known traitor to America? No, they were from a handbook for teachers published by the National Education Association, also known as the NEA for short.

 Who said: "Conditioning is a process which may be employed by the teacher to build up attitudes in the child and predispose him to the action by which those attitudes are expressed."

 Were those words taken from a Communist course book on brainwashing? No, that sage advice is from the Yearbook of the National Educational Association.

 Who said: "Education should and can be made a force to equalize the conditions of men." Could it have been those well-known equalitarian ideals Marx or Lenin? No, that was from the Secretary's Report of the National Education Association right here in the United States.

 You may be starting to get the point, but here's one more quote for you: Where do these words of wisdom come from? "What if teachers don't want power? Organize the ones who do. The building of a power base needs a leader, who is initially more important than the number of people you have behind him. Among others, Martin Luther King, Ho Chi Minh, and Fidel Castro suggest the wisdom of this advice. (Train your) people by making the other side insult or assault your people so that they can learn what the other side is really like...getting the (school) superintendent to insult or to assault your people is regarded as of higher value than ten weeks of formal training. It is hard to deal with an enemy with whom you have a personal relationship. You should not let your people fraternize with the enemy."

 Sounds like it comes from a revolutionary Marxist training manual, doesn't it? It's actually from an official report to the NEA by one Saul Alinsky.

 Most Americans do not know what is going on in the public school classrooms of this country. They complain that property taxes are too high, yet, they are perplexed when a massive bureaucracy and billions upon billions in public school funding produce not young scholars but illiterate drug-abusing criminals and delinquents.

 But sadly, most of us irresponsibly throw up our hands and hope that "someone else" will solve these problems for us, that "someone else" usually meaning teachers, politicians, educational bureaucrats, "whoever is in charge." We hope for the best and trust the politicians' promises because we feel intimidated by the size of the problems and by our own lack of expertise and knowledge in the field of education. Due to this irresponsibility on our part almost an entire generation has been denied a proper education. The situation is getting so bad in many major cities that to send your child to a public school is tantamount to child abuse. Is it surprising that even such an eager booster of the education establishment as Bill Clinton (who made a promise to send his daughter, Chelsea, to a public school) when confronted with the grim realities of the hellhole that the DC (District of Corruption) public schools have become, quietly enrolled her in an exclusive private school?

 Little John or Little Jane are, in some jurisdictions, more likely to be hooked on dope than on the classics of English literature, more likely to learn the brutal reality of rape than the subtleties of the calculus, more likely to be assaulted than instructed, and when they are instructed, it will more than likely be in how to use a condom, how to fight for "gay rights," and how to be a good citizen of the New World Order.

 Americans desperately need to become informed and involved in their children's education. A beginning of a hopeful trend is the "home schooling" movement. A small but growing group of American parents are abandoning the public schools as hopelessly incapable of providing their children with a decent education.

 On 16th Street in Washington, DC stand the offices of an organization called the National Education Association, or NEA for short. The NEA was founded in 1857 by a group of 43 teachers. For many years it was merely a professional association of teachers, acting in many ways like a labor union and fighting for the economic interests of its members, though often clothing its agenda with high-sounding rhetoric about "fighting for an equal opportunity for all children," etc. For approximately the first fifty years of its existence, the NEA had a reputation as a relatively decent and benign institution.

 The NEA represents itself today as a professional association and much more, as an "education lobby." Now that all sounds very fine, doesn't it? After all, who could be against education?

 The NEA is a massively funded and powerful organization with effective control over teachers and public education in this country, with its tentacles reaching deeply into the education bureaucracy in Washington and into your wallet and ours; and it is an organization that is firmly dedicated to the conversion of this country into a province in a one-world government. A New World Order in which the independence of the United States would cease to exist and in which the American people would become an insignificant and powerless minority.

 How did the radical transformation of this organization take place? Let us quote form the Siecus Circle, published in 1977, by Claire Chambers: "Recognizing the organization's potential for exerting tremendous pressure and influence on American education, the...socialist complex wasted no time in seizing control of the NEA; this is accomplished as far back as the early 1900's. Early NEA leaders who strove for a one-world...order included such...Communist frontiers as John Dewey and William Heard Kilpatrick, Harold Rugg and Marxist professor George S. Counts...were among the NEA teacher-leaders whose writings helped steer the leftward course of this organization in the early 1930's."

 By maneuvering converts into top administrative positions, [these] master planner gained control of the NEA. At roughly the same time, the then National Chairman of the Communist Party, USA, William Z. Foster, in his book, "Toward A Soviet America," wrote that education could advance the revolution best if centrally controlled and organized under a federal Department of Education. Foster said that the Department of Education, "should be revolutionized, cleansed of religious, patriotic and other features of the bourgeois ideology. The students will be taught on the basis of Marxian dialectical materialism, internationalism, and the general ethics of the new Socialist society."

NEA Is Anti-Christian - Part 2

 Is it merely a coincidence that the NEA fought for decades to establish just such a federal Department of Education, as envisaged by Communist William Z. Foster? Their efforts paid off in 1977 when Jimmy Carter, in return for NEA support in the 1976 election, created the DOE. The DOE bureaucracy has been since its inception heavily interlocked with that of the NEA.

 But surely, you may say, our Department of Education and the NEA are not promoting the internationalism and anti-Christianism, anti-Americanism proposed by William Z. Foster! Judge for yourself the motives of the NEA, as we read to you from the NEA publication, "Today's Education," the March/April 1976 issue, part of an article entitled "A Declaration of Interdependence" by long-time world government proponent Henry Steele Commager: "Now we must join with others to bring forth a New World Order. It is essential that mankind free itself from the limitations of national prejudice. All people are part of one global community. We call upon all nations to strengthen and sustain the United Nations and its specialized agencies, and other institutions of world order..."

 The fact that the NEA published this treasonous trash in the Bicentennial year of American Independence is an insult to every patriot. We say that the NEA's "Declaration of Interdependence" is in complete opposition to our Declaration of Independence. The one-world agenda of this organization is a direct threat to our national and individual freedom.

 Columnist Russel Evans wrote in 1983: "A big wheel in the machinery of the proposed New World Order is the National Education Association, now enjoying its crowning achievement: the Cabinet-level Department of Education. In the master plan for this New World Order, a scheme that is frightening more and more Americans, it appears that the NEA wants to control education...this is [part of] an insidious global machine designed to crush our national sovereignty."

 In 1937, in its 15th Yearbook, the NEA itself declared that: "The present capitalistic and nationalistic school system has been supplanted in but one place - Russia - and that change was effected by revolution. Hence the verdict of history would seem to indicate that we are likely to have to depend upon revolution for social change of an important and far-reaching character."

 How was it possible for such and anti-Christian, anti-American and frankly Marxist agenda to be espoused by America's largest professional association of teachers, for decades, without sparking outrage and resistance on a massive scale from parents and the many good and decent teachers?

 For one thing, part of the responsibility must lie at our feet; for it is our money-consciousness, and our materialism, our essential conservatism and our desire to "get along" and "not rock the boat" that all too often paralyzes Americans when faced with a revolutionary enemy.

 We must lay a great portion of the fault at the feet of the Judeo-Christian preachers in the pulpits of America; for they have taught far too long that Christians should not get involved in the political process. And if Christians do not get involved then all we are left with are the degenerates, perverts, deviates, Queers, Jews, Baby Killers and other undesirables.

 Then all too many Americans try to sense which way the wind is blowing and are always careful not to say or do anything that might get them branded as politically incorrect. Unfortunately, the media arbiters of what is and what is not politically correct are the allies of the NEA and the other enemies of Almighty God and the people of the United States. Additionally, we Americans don't like to believe that we have any domestic enemies. We like to believe that all our institutions and leaders are just fine and dandy, in need of a little fine-tuning perhaps. but essentially sound.

 We find it almost impossible to accept the fact that powerful alien forces have literally taken over large parts of both the public and private sectors in this country. We have an obsessive need to believe that "everything's all right." To believe otherwise would mean that we had a responsibility to face up to this extremely frightening and dangerous situation and do something about it.

 Another element in the amazing phenomenon of American non-resistance to the theft of our children's minds is the fact that the schemers who plan to turn our country into a Third World province of their world government were rising to power all over American society in the 1930's, not just in the educational establishment. With the accession to power of Franklin Roosevelt (Roosevelt's Jewish Ancestry.

 Even a hasty perusal of the genealogy chart as produced by the Carnegie Institution of Washington, D.C., under direction of Dr. H.H. Laughlin, per asso. press Dispatch March 7, 1934, in the Daily Citizen of Tucson, Arizona, a similar chart was published by the Washington, D.C., Star, of February 29, 1936.

 Even a hasty perusal of the document convinces one as to President Roosevelt's Jewish ancestry. From the viewpoint of eugenics, it explains his natural bent toward radicalism. It shows why he has given hundreds of so-called Liberals, Socialists and Communists powerful positions in the national government. It reveals the origin of the sinister spirit which today animates the White House. It proves unmistakably, that the Roosevelt Administration offers a biological, as well as a political problem.

 The New York Times of March 14, 1935, quotes the President as saying: "In the distant past my ancestors may have been Jews. All I know about the origin of the Roosevelt family is that they are apparently descended from Claes Martenszen van Roosevelt, who came from Holland." Additional information regarding the nationality of the Roosevelt family, was given by Chase S. Osborn, early in 1934, at St. Petersburg, Florida. Mr. Osborn was formerly Governor of Michigan.

 The leading newspaper of the city (The Times) carried the following report after the interview: "Although a Republican, the former Governor has a sincere regard for President Roosevelt and his policies. He referred to the 'Jewish ancestry' of the President, explaining how he is a descendant of the Rossocampo family expelled from Spain in 1620. Seeking safety in Germany, Holland and other countries, members of the family, he said, changed their name to Rosenberg, Rosenbaum, Rosenblum, Rosenvelt and Rosenthal. The Roosenvelts in North Holland finally became Roosevelt, soon becoming apostates with the first generation and others following suit until, in the fourth generation, a little storekeeper by the name of Jacobus Roosevelt was the only one who remained true to His Jewish Faith. It is because of this Jewish ancestry, former Governor Osborn said, that President Roosevelt has the trend of economic safety (?) in his veins."

 In the 1938 "World Almanac" under the heading "Biographies of U.S. Presidents and Their Wives," page 237, appears: "Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the son of James Roosevelt, a direct descendant of Claes Martenzen van Rosenvelt, who arrived in New Amsterdam in 1649 and married Jannetje Samuels."

 The following is from "The House of Roosevelt" by Paul Haber, 1936 edition "Claes Rosenvelt entered the cloth business in New York, and was married in 1682. He accumulated a fortune. He then changed his name to Nicholas Rosenvelt. Of his four sons, Isaac died young, Nicholas married Sarah Solomons. Jacobus married Catherina Hardenburg. The Roosevelts were not a fighting but a peace-loving people, devoted to trade. Isaac became a capitalist. He founded the Bank of New York in 1790."

 The American Freedom Magazine of Los Angeles, California, April, 1938, issue, stated: "In an address to the National Convention of the D.A.R., President F.D. Roosevelt said that he too was of revolutionary ancestry. But not a Roosevelt was in the American Army. They were Tories, busy entertaining British Officers. The first Roosevelt came to America in 1649. His name was Claes Rosenfelt. He was Jew. Nicholas the son of Claes, was the ancestor of both Franklin and Theodore. He married A Jewish Girl named Kunst in 1682. Nicholas had a son named Jacobus Rosenfelt. In the family tree there are 351 persons bearing biblical names of the Tribe of Israel. From the Corvallis Gazette-Times, of Corvallis, Oregon."

NEA Is Anti-Christian Part 3

 New York Jews having designed and struck and struck off a medal with the head of Roosevelt on one side and the six-point Solomon Star, synagogue symbol of possession and world power, on the other, with a mystical so-called "Good Luck" idiom in the center of the star, the undersigned and his associates investigated to ascertain the significance, if any, and report these implications: "Good Luck and Wisdom to Franklin D. Roosevelt, our Modern Moses, Leading Jewry in 'The Promised Land' (America) under the 'Seal of Solomon.'"

 The following New York item was published from Coast to Coast under an Associated Press date line of May 8, 1937: "President Roosevelt will receive the tenth award of the Gottheil Medal for 'Distinguished Services to Jewry.'" Another such Jewish medal was given him December 22, 1938, according to the N.Y. Herald-Tribune of December 23, 1938. What "distinguished services" did Roosevelt render to Jewry???

 Professor H.J. Laski, Jewish Socialist of England, was quoted in the London "Fascist" of January, 1935, thus: "If the experiment for which Roosevelt is responsible, should in any serious degree break down, as a result of the association with it of a number of eminent Jews, there would be an out-break of Anti-Semitism in the U.S. more profound than anything Anglo-Saxon Civilization has so far known."

 The Delanos Jewish Also?: Writing in the "Hakenkreuzbanner" of May 14, 1939, Professor Dr. Johann von Leers of Berlin-Dahlem, Germany, publishes an exhaustive analysis of Roosevelt's ancestry. While it is apparent that the authorities quoted are not convinced regarding the authenticity of the Holland Rossocampo-Rosenvelt Jewish genealogy, a new discovery is quoted to show that President Delano Roosevelt's mother, Sarah Delano, is from a Jewish-blood family.

 "At once the veil fails" comments Dr. von Leers. "The President's father married Sarah Delano; and it becomes clear. Schmalix (genealogist) writes: 'In the seventh generation we see the mother of Franklin Delano Roosevelt as being of Jewish descent. The Delanos are descendants of an Italian or Spanish Jewish family; Dilano, Dilan, Dillano.

 The Jew Delano drafted an agreement with the West Indian Co., in 1657 regarding the colonization of the island of Curacao. About this the directors of the West Indies Co, had correspondence with the Governor of New Holland. In 1624 numerous Jews had settled in North Brazil, which was under Dutch Dominion. The old German traveler Uienhoff, who was in Brazil between 1640 and 1649, reports: 'Among the Jew settlers the greatest number had emigrated from Holland.'

 The reputation of the Jews was so bad that the Dutch Governor Stuyvesant (1655) demanded that their immigration be prohibited in the newly founded colony of New Amsterdam (the New York of today). It would be interesting to investigate whether the Family Delano belonged to these Jews whom the Dutch Governor did not want. It is known that the Sephardic Jewish families which came from Spain and Portugal always inter-married; and the assumption exists that the Family Delano, despite Christian-confession, remained purely Jewish."

 "What results? The mother of President Roosevelt was a Delano. According to Jewish Law (Schulchan Aruk, Ebenaezer IV) the woman is the bearer of the heredity. That means; children of a full-blooded Jewess and a Christian are, according to Jewish Law, Jews.

 It is probable that the Family Delano kept the Jewish blood clean, and that President Roosevelt, according to Jewish Law, is a blooded-Jew even if one assumes that the father of the President was Aryan. "We can understand why Jewish associations call him the 'New Moses;' why he gets Jewish medals - highest orders of the Jewish people. For every Jew who is acquainted with the law, he is evidently one of them. The secret surrounding President Roosevelt solves itself through the assiduous investigations of Schmalix."

 In this connection it is noteworthy that Who's Who in American Jewry lists the New York Brentanos as Jewish - Sephardics from Italy or Spain. Delano and Brentano end with "o". Jews expelled from Brazil settled in the U.S. Genealogist Schmalix is quoted in the article mentioned as saying: "When the Delanos changed to the Christian religion can only be ascertained by further investigations in America."

 With this alleged Jewish Delano descent added to the other records herein the fact that New York Jews on the East Side constantly refer to the President proudly as "Rosenvelt," it would seem that Dr. von Leers, in his letter of May 14, 1939, to the undersigned, transmitting his latest discoveries, is justified in exclaiming: "It being true that the Delanos are well-known Jews from the Netherlands, President Roosevelt is, from the standpoint of Jewish Heredity Law, As Good A Jew As Bernard M. Baruch." Baruch is a Sephardic Jew, whose family is reported to have come from Europe via Brazil to North America.

 Roosevelt Expected & Wanted the Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor: The Pearl Harbor attack was instigated by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill. The attack was forced into existence by the United States, Great Britain and the Dutch. This was accomplished by an embargo, which cut off all shipping into and out of Japan, thus threatening Japan with starvation.

 Nine months before the Pearl Harbor Attack, one Clifford M. Andrew was sent to Pearl Harbor and put in charge of a critical portion of both Army and Navy Intelligence Communications, so that when the time of the attack came, Andrew would be in a position to run interference by preventing the commanding officers at Hawaii, Admiral Kimmel and General Short, from receiving any warning of an impending attack.

 Approximately one week prior to the Pearl Harbor attack, General George C. Marshall and Admiral Stark discontinued informing President Roosevelt of incoming Japanese intelligence information. Also one week before the attack, Rear Admiral Paulus Prince Powell (Roosevelt's Senior White House Naval Aide prior to 1934) was ordered to the Naval Intelligence Department, Washington, D.C., to be briefed as first naval attache' to Portugal (which was neutral).

 On Thursday, December 4th, 1941, at 2:00 o'clock in the afternoon (Hawaiian time), a message was received in the Hawaiian Army Intelligence Department from Melbourne, Australia that the United States agreement with Great Britain and the Dutch (the ABCD agreement) had been activated; that we were automatically at war with Japan. Furthermore, the Hawaiian military intelligence department had received messages from U.S. picket ships and submarines to the effect that a Japanese fleet with aircraft carriers fully loaded was approaching Hawaii and would be within striking distance by Sunday morning, December 7th.

  Gerald Mason Van Dyke, was an Army Intelligence Officer in Hawaii at the time of the attack. He knew of the coming attack. His first report on the subject was made November 29th, 1941. He sent his warning message to Washington, D.C., Thursday afternoon, December 4th, 1941, at 2:00 p.m. His message was received and intercepted by Rear Admiral Paulus Prince Powell in Washington, D.C., at about 7:00 p.m. (due to Global Time Difference), Powell notified Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox who in turn immediately contacted Secretary of War Henry Stimson.

 Stimson called Roosevelt, and Roosevelt came to the Naval Intelligence Department. Secretary of Navy Knox said that they should get the Navy out and set up a defense perimeter for the Islands. Under-secretary of Navy James Vincent Forestall became very concerned too. Roosevelt blocked their attempt to warn Pearl Harbor by putting Powell, Knox and Forestall under armed guard until after the Pearl Harbor Attack.

 Roosevelt sent the following message to Clifford M. Andrew: "The Japanese will attack, do not prepare defenses, we need the full support of the American Nation in a war-time effort by an unprovoked attack upon the Nation." The message sent to Admiral Kimmel and General Short by Roosevelt read "Expect Japanese Sabotage." Preparation for Sabotage is exactly the opposite of the preparation for an aerial attack.

NEA Is Anti-Christian Part 4

 On Friday evening at about 5:00 p.m., December 5th, 1941, Mason warned Lyle Hartford Van Dyke, Sr., of Portland, Oregon, that the Japanese would attack soon, most probably Sunday. He was told that the intelligence department in Washington, D.C., had been warned. So he put up a stock of canned goods on Saturday, December 6, 1941, in preparation for the attack.

 The attack occurred Sunday morning, December 7th, with a death toll of 4,000 men. The Arizona went down in ninety feet of water with its hold only thirty feet below the surface. Roosevelt forbade any rescues from being made, and men buried alive in the Arizona banged on the bulkheads, screaming for help and kept diaries in the dark for two weeks after the attack until they finally died.

 The Supreme Court and the Legislature covered Roosevelt's Treasonous Mass Murder by scapegoating Admiral Kimmel and General Short. Had Roosevelt lived past the end of the Second World War, the investigation of his actions would have resulted in a complete exposure of the One World Government - New World Order - Conspiracy now coming down upon us.

 Roosevelt was killed when his face was blown off by a Soviet portrait artist. When James Vincent Forestall's knowledge became a threat to those in power in 1949, he was pitched out of about the seventh floor of the hospital in Bethesda, Maryland. On May 15, 1966, Clifford M. Andrew was murdered in his home in Tigard, Oregon by a bullet in the back of his head. The FBI took charge of the matter.

 On Thursday, May 10, 1973, an attempt was made by twenty police officers, Federal, State (Oregon) and County (Clackamas) to steal the manuscript of Hartford Van Dyke, then about two months into the writing.

 However, he was tipped off four hours before the  raid and was able to secure the work. Three weeks later a second attempt was made to get his manuscript, and so he went into hiding until his book, "The Skeleton In Uncle Sam's Closet," was completed and published), the federal government threw out the welcome mat to secret and even open Communists at every level and department. These same alien forces were also at that time consolidating their power in the news and entertainment media, and all of these parts of the alien anti-Christian, anti-American coalition cooperated closely in covering each other's tracks and in diverting the attention of Americans to trivialities or imagined overseas threats, just as they do today.

 What do the NEA and their allies want? They want power - absolute power as their number one goal. This is the real motivation behind their push for the "consolidation" of local school districts, which minimizes the influence of parents and local school boards on educational decision-making.

 Their desire for total power is also what sends them into a state of near-frenzy on those rare occasions when parents have demanded the removal of obscene or subversive textbooks. You see, parents not wanting their children to read anti-Christian, and anti-American propaganda or homosexual smut is "censorship," whereas the NEA's rewriting of American history and editing of Western literature to fit in with the "multi cultural" agenda is "academic freedom." They will talk a nice line to an audience of parents, and a very different one in their own conclaves and publications, a few of which we have quoted today. They care little for reading, writing, or mathematics; and they see traditional civics, English literature, Western Art, and American History as "racist" and "Eurocentric."

 The NEA's agenda for our children is this: Our children must be prepared for a world government by the year 2000. All pride of race or nationality must be destroyed, as counter to this goal. Unrestricted immigration and integration into the classroom of millions from the ghetto and the Third World must be encouraged, not out of any pretended concern for poor or oppressed peoples, but to dilute and eventually to erase our national identity as a people.

 Our children must be taught that traditional American moral standards and values, the heritage of our founding fathers, are outdated and repressive. Students must learn that homosexuality is normal and even desirable. Students are to learn that the traditional family is a holdover from an earlier, oppressive age, and that today they are "free to choose" "alternative lifestyles" like sodomy, lesbianism, or worse. The value system of the self-styled leftist "experts" are fast replacing that of caring parents and families.

 If you are skeptical about what we are saying, we urge you to carefully read the textbooks, all the textbooks that are now being used in your local public schools. You will find that the NEA has kept the promise of its slogan of several years ago: That slogan was "All Books Over 5 Years Old Must Go!" Attend school board meetings and hearings, become an activist for our children. You will find that these change agents in our public schools hate and abhor traditional education, moral decency, and American patriotism. You will find that you are put on their enemies list if you try to restor those values and standards.

 Do you want your precious son or daughter to be taught that homosexual perversion is acceptable behavior? Do you want your little girl or little boy to be taught that the end of American indepen-dence and our submersion into a "New World Order" is desirable and good?

 Do you want your children to be told that the Founding Fathers of this country were wicked bigots and criminals? Do you want your children to be taught to kill a little unborn baby, just for convenience sake? If you do want these things, then you need do nothing. The bureaucrats in the NEA are taking care of business just fine. If, however, you don't want to see America's children indoctrinated to accept a future as serfs in a multicultural, Third World America and if you'd like to see the traditional patriotic nature and academic standards of American education restored, then you need to join together with your fellow patriots and work for a brighter future for our nation and people.

 The 'Judeo-Christian Heritage' Hoax! "Christianity would be much stronger if its Jewish heritage had not been neglected," a New York theologian said today. This quote is the first paragraph of a news story wired from Chicago, March 25, 1965, by the UPI, in reporting the remarks of Rev. William D. Davies of Union Theological Seminary who discussed, "Christianity's dependence and growth from Judaism" at an inter-faith conference of theologians and teachers of religion, "sponsored by the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith; the Roman Catholic Bellarmine School of Theology at Loyola University; and the Divinity School of the University of Chicago."

 The dispatch also quoted Rev. Davies as saying: "Jesus was, in a sense, a rabbi no less than a prophet. Both the method and very largely the substance and form of his ethical teaching were rabbinical. Nourished in the synagogue, Jesus gave his followers much of the ethics of the synagogue."

 The Rev. Davies is a liar, for Jesus did no such thing, and The Rabbis of Judaism understand this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement.

 Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo-Christian was relatively new, "There is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian Religion. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other!" (National Jewish Information Service, 6412 W. Olympic Blvd. L.A. CA)

 This is the Result of Confused Thinking: This kind of confused thinking results from the propaganda promoted by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Jewish Committee to convince Christians that their religion is just another Jewish sect, the implication being that Christianity has gone astray from "the true religion," Judaism. For the time being, however, the emphasis is placed on "our Judeo-Christian Heritage."

 "The current expression 'Judeo-Christian' is an error which has altered the course of universal history by the confusion it has sown in men's mind, if by it one is meant to understand the Jewish origin of Christianity; for by abolishing the fundamental distinctions between Jewish and Christian messianism, it seeks to bring together two ideas that are radically in opposition.

NEA Is Anti-Christian Part 5

 By laying the accent exclusively on the 'Christian' idea to the detriment of the 'Judean' it conjures away monotheistic messianism - a valuable discipline at all levels of thought, and reduces it to a purely confessional messianism, preoccupied like Christian messianism with the salvation of the individual soul. If the term 'Judeo-Christian' does point to a common origin, there is no doubt that it is a most dangerous idea.

 It is based on a 'contrdictio in adjecto' which has set the path of history on the wrong track. It links in one breath Two Ideas which are Completely Irreconcilable, it seeks to demonstrate that there is no difference between day and night or hot and cold or black and white, and thus introduces a fatal element of confusion to a basis on which some, nevertheless, are endeavoring to construct a civilization. Christianity offers to the world a limited messianism which it wishes to impose as the only valid one...Even Spinoza, who was further than any other thinker from the historic messianism of Israel, wrote: 'As for what certain churches say, that God assumed human nature, I must confess that this seems to me as absurd as saying that a circle assumed the shape of a square...'

 The dogmatic exclusiveness professed by Christianity must finally end...It is the obstinate Christian claim to be the sole heir to Israel which propagates anti-Semitism. This scandal must terminate sooner or later; the sooner it goes, the sooner the world will be rid of the issue of lies in which anti-Semitism shrouds itself." (Joshua Jehouda, l'Antisemitisme Miroir du Monde, pp. 135-136; Judaism and the Vatican, Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 30-31)

 To give the idea wide currency the Jewish propagandists are getting plenty of cooperation from within the Christian community. In the November 1963 issue of the ADL Bulletin there is a feature story with the headline and subhead reading: "To Know Their Jewish Heritage...A Catholic teaches Catholics that their faith rests on a solid foundation of ancient Judaism."

 The article is about "Leon Paul, a Catholic writer, lecturer, and teachers," who is conducting adult education classes on "The Church and Judaism" under the auspices of the Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, N.Y. The article quotes Paul as saying: "Catholics are very interested in what I call 'their Jewish heritage.' What is more, they are interested in Jews themselves - their customs, their beliefs, even their houses of worship."

 That Mr. Paul did not say "our Jewish heritage" was Not a subconscious slip of the tongue, for what the ADL did not tell its readers was that Leon Paul is a Jewish convert to Catholicism. The article then tells how Paul takes his students on field trips to a synagogue, about which he says: "If a Catholic doesn't feel at home in a synagogue, he doesn't understand the origin of his own beliefs."

 "A Jew remains a Jew even though he changes his religion; a Christian which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A Free thinker and Atheist always remains a Jew." (Jewish World, London December 14, 1922)

 It is also disclosed in this ADL feature that Paul writes a column to "introduce Catholics to their roots in Jewish tradition" which is syndicated to diocesan newspapers from coast to coast, and that: "For his information on Jews, Jewish life, and Judaism, Paul consults with Jewish authorities and organizations - the Anti-Defamation League is often used in his 'Mosaic' column as a reference source, and for stories on specific activities."

 "The not content merely to destroy Christianity, but he preaches the gospel of Judaism; he not only assails the Catholic or the Protestant faith, but he incites to the unbelief, and then imposes on those whose faith he has undermined his own conception of the world, of morality and of life. He is engaged in his historic mission, the annihilation of the religion of Christ." (Benard Lazare, Antisemitism: It's History and Causes, Translated by Britons Publishing Co., London (1967), p. 158)

 The ADL also supplies propaganda materials for use in Christian Churches and schools. In another ADL Bulletin, Rabbi Arthur Gilbert boasts: "...about 40,000 Catholic and Protestant churches have borrowed kits from regional offices and more than a million pamphlets have been bought by church schools...The Vacation Bible School course for juniors, to be conducted in some 100,000 Protestant churches this summer, is based on an ADL booklet."

 "The guidance and control of America has gravitated into the hands of those least worthy of trusteeship. One of their most notable achievements, has been the making of 'male prostitutes' who do the dirty work for them [Jews]. A 'male prostitute' is a male who offers the facilities of his anatomy from the neck up, to anyone who is willing to pay the price, exactly as a female prostitute of the same species offers her body from the waist down. Thousands of these 'pseudo-Christian 'male prostitutes -- male prostitutes are circulating in all walks of life, pandering to evil propaganda for monetary profit and political power." (Facts Are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman)

 Hypocrisy of Textbooks: Also in line with this "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction is the Life and Worship series of Catholic ("Much of the old love for Isis, and especially for Cybele, the Great Mother of the Gods, was taken over into the church and translated into the worship of Mary, the Mother of Christ...Similarly the worship of the old deities was made a part of Christianity.

 The pagan gods and goddesses were discreetly made over into Christian saints, as is instanced by the case of St. Bridget. Their 'relics' were sold far and wide in Christendom as fetishes guaranteed to ward off evil; and their ancient festive days were made part of the Christian calendar.

 The Roman Parilia in April became the Festival of St. George, and the pagan midsummer orgy in June was converted into the Festival of St. John; the holy day of Diana in August became the Festival of the Assumption of the Virgin; and the Celtic feast of the dead in November was changed into the Festival of All Souls (Halloween).

 The twenty-fifth day of December, the winter solstice according to ancient reckoning, celebrated the birthday of the sun-god of Mithraism, was accepted as the birthday of Christ, and the spring rites in connection with the death and re-birth of the mystery gods were converted into the Easter rites of the Crucifixion and Resurrection>' (This Believing World, Rabbi Lewis Browne, pp. 294-295)) textbooks for grade-school children, first announced at a national convention of Jewish Rabbis in April, 1965, and given full page coverage in the New York Times and New York Journal-American which said: "The texts strive to point up the common religious ties which have bound those of the Catholic faith to those of the Jewish faith through the centuries."

 Judeo-Christian Heritage A Hoax: It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians. That "Judeo-Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well stated in the author-initiative religious journal, Judaism, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote: "As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism because it Rejects Christianity; and Christianity is Christianity because it Rejects Judaism. What is usually referred to as the Jewish-Christian Traditions Exists Only in Christian or Secularist Fantasy."

 There is no doubt this is true! And the fantasy exists in Christian and Secularist minds only because it was implanted there by the persistent propaganda of the masters of intrigue of the ADL-AJC Network. Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that knowledgeable theologians, Jewish and Christians who constantly allude to "our Judeo-Christian heritage" are for their own specious purposes perpetuate a grotesque and fantastic hoax.

NEA Is Anti-Christian - Part 6

 This hypocrisy about "our Judeo-Christian heritage" has become such a fad, and has made such a powerful impression, that on May 10, 1969, the New York Times was able to report from Hillsdale, N.J., that: "A $1 million Roman Catholic Church designed to reflect the Judaic heritage of Christianity was blessed and dedicated here today by Arch-bishop Thomas A. Boland of the Newark Archdiocese ...An Old Testament wing representing Judaism and a New Testament wing representing Christianity flank two sides of the sanctuary."

 "Heritage" is a New Invention: One can search Christian literature through the centuries and nowhere has the phrase "Judeo-Christian heritage" ever been used until just a few years ago, when the ADL and the AJC and their associated groups, stooges and sycophants began popularizing this malicious myth. The result has been that today this unholy refrain is being repeated parrot-like by Catholic priests and prelates and by Protestant bishops and clergymen of every denomination, who have been encouraged to regard the expression as a mark of sophisticated liberalism, and as evidence that they are completely free of the so-called sin of "Christian anti-Semitism."

 "Given by Senator Joseph McCarthy, six months before his mouth was closed forever: George Washington's surrender: 'And many of the people of the land became Jews. (Esther 9:17) The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century.

 Jonathan Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that 'a holy war will now being in America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.' Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: 'Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government they believe to be divine will be the British Empire [under the control of the Jews]. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry [Lucifer - as Albert Pike disclosed in Morals and Dogma].' And indeed George Washington was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army."

 Cornwall is well knew that his military defeat was only the beginning of World Catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control could be accomplished through a false religion. What he predicted has come to pass!!! Of that, there is no longer any doubt. A brief study of American religious history will show that Masonry and Judaism has infused into every church in America their veiled Phallic Religion.

 Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell [both Jews] started Jehovah Witnesses' in order to spread Judaism throughout the world under the guise of Christianity.

 Needless to say, most Christian leaders, both lay and clerical, who are injecting this noxious notion into their writings, discussions and sermons, are largely unaware of its true meaning; they misunderstand its importance, they are completely unconscious of the subversive purpose they are serving. They are using the phrase mechanically, thoughtlessly, simply because it has become a popular catch-phrase. "I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish." (Rabbi Martin Siegel, New York Magazine, p. 32, January 18, 1972)

 This brainwashing scheme has been so successful that the devilish distortion was even fasted on the Vatican Council and put into the mouths of 2,400 bishops, archbishops and cardinals, who know better; but who should have read the Declaration on the Jews with more critical scrutiny, before adopting it.

 The Declaration that the Vatican Council Fathers approved embodies a glaring misconception of this popular fallacy when it says that there is a "great spiritual heritage common to Christians and Jews"  referring to the Jews of today. In its reference to the Jews of today the Declaration says in the very same sentence that "it is the wish of this sacred Council to foster and recommend a mutual knowledge and esteem..."

 The reason for the inclusion of the word "mutual" is explained in a footnote in the official American publication of "The Documents of Vatican II." It declares that this word "tactfully expresses the request of Cardinal Ruffini, Archbishop of Palermo, that Christians should love Jews, and Jews should declare that they will not hate Christians (and he asked that certain passages in the Talmud be corrected)."

 Anti-Christian Passages in Talmud: Of course, there has been no declaration by any Jewish authority that Jews should stop hating Christians, nor have any anti-Christian passages in the Talmud been corrected. And it can be said with certainty that the Jewish religious community, unlike the Christian community, will never permit the teachings of the Talmud to be corrected.

 It is because of such misconceptions as promulgated by the Vatical Council that the Judeo-Christian heritage myth persists.
     In the ADL's monthly magazine, "Christian Friends," which is sent free to Christian clergymen across the country, Dr. Joseph L. Lichten, the ADL agent who attended Vatican Council sessions disguised as a correspondent for two leading Catholic magazines, "Ave Maria" and "Jubilee," falsely writes that the above Council statement "affirms the Judeo-Christian heritage."

 The phrase "Judeo-Christian heritage" implies that present-day Judaism and Christianity emanated form the same spiritual source and share similar characteristics and traditions. This suggestion is unfortunately misleading - it is fatuous nonsense. More important, it is a brazen sacrilegious affront to Jesus Christ, the founder of Christianity.

 Christianity has its roots in God - a God which the Jews of today deny and hate, when they deny His Son. Christianity is based upon the teachings of Jesus Christ.

 It has no kinship with the religion practiced by the Jews of Jesus' time, the religion of the Pharisees that Christ denounced and condemned, time and time again, the religion that the Jews of our time claim as their heritage. Judaism is based on lies, deception, murder and intrigue.

 There is no truth in the presumption that Jews and Christians can be hyphenated, that Christianity and Judaism share common foundations in a common culture, that they are two forms of the same belief.

 The "Judeo-Christian heritage" slogan suggests that there is some connection, a close religious bond, between true Christians and a collection of modern Jews of various beliefs, unbelief and non-belief, who call their religion Judaism. There is no such connection; there can be no such bond. But this is not to say that there can be so friendship between Christians, Jews and mutual respect for each others beliefs.

horizontal rule

     Definition of an American: "A person who is a slave to the International Bankers and Zionist elite, but believes he is free, because they can voice their opinions; as long as the government agents don't hear it."
Click Here if you would like a hard copy of any of Willie Martin's books

Jew Watch - Willie Martin

horizontal rule