Free news

FREE blog







Gun poll








14th Amdt

19th Amdt














Working Women


According to The National Opinion Research Center, 77% of Americans believe that "most men are better suited emotionally for politics than are most women" and 85% believe "women should take care of running their homes and leave running the country up to men".

Table 13, Page 36

Trends in Attitudes Towards Women and Politics

 % Willing to Vote for Women for President% Women Emotionally Suited for Politics% Women Help Run Country as Well as Homes

Source: GSS

Question Wordings:

If your party nominated a woman for President, would you vote for

her if she were qualified for the job?

Tell me if you agree or disagree with this statement: Most men are

better suited emotionally for politics than are most women.

Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Women should take

care of running their homes and leave running the country up to



horizontal rule

In other words, the majority of Americans realize that permitting women to enter the American workforce in large numbers, to create a hostile environment for productive men employees, to displace more qualified men employees through affirmative action programs of all kinds and thus demoralize entire corporations, to reduce men to only 40% of college admissions even though two thirds of those who score above 550 in SAT Math are men, to bite the hand that feeds them by suing their own employers for purported (and whimsical) harassment and discrimination by FELLOW employees, has been a colossal failure.  As the percent of America's managers and administrators who are women increased from 15% to 44%, the purchasing power of American families plunged by two thirds.  Where the American family earned 5 times more than the Japanese family in 1970, the Japanese family now earns twice as much.  Where we had a relatively high savings rate in 1970, the average American family now has a negative savings rate while the average Japanese family saves 33 cents of every wage dollar.


Number of households (1,000s)

Men's Median Income*

Women's Median Income

Total Men's Income ($billion)

Total Women's Income ($billion)

Married, children, only father works






Married, children, both father and mother work






Married, no children, only husband works






Married, no children, both husband and wife work, < 40 y.o.






Married, no children, both husband and wife work, 40-64 y.o.






Married, no children, both husband and wife work, > 64 y.o.






Mothers, no spouse





Fathers, no spouse





Men headed household, no children or spouse





Women headed household, no children or spouse





Single men household





Single women household









Recipients of $1,789 in federal outlays




Net contribution to the economy





*"Income" includes AFDC (Aid to Families With Dependent Children), PRWORA (Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act), TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), Social Security payments, SSI payments, Railroad Retirement Income, Unemployment Compensation, government workers' compensation benefits (like black lung disease payments), veterans payments and military retirement benefits, private pensions, Keogh plans, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), Simplified Employee Pensions (SEPs), individual annuity contracts, federal and state and local government employee pension payments,

*"Income" does not include non-cash benefits received by welfare recipients, workers' compensation benefits from private disability insurance, medicare and medicaid benefits, education benefits,

See for a description of "income".

See for the Current Population Survey from the US Census Bureau.

horizontal rule


Following is an excellent summary of the role of women in a Christian society.

But this statement is in dire need of correction:

"In non-Chrstian countries and the expanding communist world, women are still held in the lowest regard. In secret, they idolise the western American women for their better roles in life."

It is not correct that women of the world envy American women "for their better roles in life". They envied them because of the standard of living which they had achieved BEFORE affirmative action, BEFORE they became such a large percentage of the work force, BEFORE they occupied 44% of executive and management positions.

Many of these foreign women no longer need to envy American women for this high standard of living because the entry of American women into the labor force parallelled a two thirds plunge in average American family purchasing power, which reduced the standard of living of American women to lower than the women of 17 other nations who previously envied them.

Furthermore, not even American women envy women in these "better roles in life". The vast majority of American women envy women in traditional family roles, and don't consider being "independent" working women to be a "better role" whatsoever. Even polls conducted by feminist rags like Cosmopolitan show that 90% of women in the home don't envy women in the workforce while 75% of women in the workforce DO envy women in the home. This is an important point that must be considered in this otherwise excellent analysis. According to the more reliable National Opinion Research Organization, 77% of Americans believe that "most men are better suited emotionally for politics than are most women" and 85% believe "women should take care of running their homes and leave running the country up to men".  

Men score up to 250 points higher than women on the Graduate Record Exam, however, men constitute only 40% of college admissions now, thanks to affirmative action which 85% of Americans oppose.  

The problem to the economy of denying men admission to college in such massive numbers is that women college graduates don't earn any more than men who only graduated from high school, whereas men who graduate from college earn 27% more.  

In other words, the tremendous percent of our national resources which is spent to provide college educations for women doesn't raise their contribution to the economy any higher than a high school education raises the contribution of men to the economy. This is partly why even by liberal organizations like The Gallup Poll report that 17 out of 20 Americans oppose affirmative action.  

This is evidence that most Americans really do understand how this kind of anti-male discrimination and bias is destroying our culture.



horizontal rule

From: Bob Jones  [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 11:17 PM Subject: Women Priests ?

Women Priests?

From Pastor George Udvary's Identity Bible Reference Manual

The current liberal hysteria that has permeated Christian churches in the past decade or so, agrees that is is right to ordain women as ministers, priests or preachers. The pressure for this change has come primarily from civil rights and women's organizations-E.R.A. enthusiansts and other feminist groups. Their slogans and agitations are bolstered by socialist and leftist ideology groups, which in reality are, social communist sympathizers. Americans tend to be maivelt gullible, especially the American Christian woman.

These groups use the argument that women are abused sex objects, who are sentenced by marreage to boredom, homemaking and child-raising. What they do not tell the American woman today, is that she is the most highly esteemed, freest, richest, most educated, most protected and certainly the most tecnologically-aided woman on the face of the earth. To the uninformed, this may sound like an unfounded accusation, but it is true. In non-Chrstian countries and the expanding communist world, women are still held in the lowest regard. In secret, they idolise the western American women for their better roles in life.

America's women have been challenged to be like men. They have been encouraged to compete in every phase of industry, such as, mining ,construction and the military. It is one situation for a woman to work next to a man at any job she can arrange, but to ensconce herself in the priesthood is having gone too far.

This primary mistake is diametrically opposed to the sanctions set down by Yahweh in the Bible. Uni-sexism is just an attempt to destroy the family, the very structure and moral fuber of this nation. The scriptures must be obeyed. Violation of Yahweh's laws leads to punishment for those who rebel, even when an entire nation is involved.

"For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man:...but all things of Yahweh" (1 Cor. 11:8,9,12). This simply means that a woman is not to be a teacing-praching minister or priest of the church, if that position is ranked over men. The responsible position belongs to an ordained man, but in all other areas of church life, a woman can contribute her abilities without censure.

It is a little known biblical fact that in the Old Testament times, a few select Israelite women have had high-ranking positions. Miriam was the first woman prophetess, and the sister of Aaron and Moses. Deborah was the only woman judge over Israel and even a war leader. Huldah was a prophetess and the wife of Shallum the son of Tikvah, the son of Harhas, keeper of the wardrobe (for King Josiah).

Micah the prophet, also gave us an important prophecy. In Micah 4, he predicted that in the latter days and in the last battle, the daughters of true Israel will Play a big roll to "thresh" the Antichrist enemy (Mic, 4:13).

In the New Testament (Luke 2:36-38), we read about Anna, the prophetess, from the tribe of Asher, the daughter of Phanuel who was 84, when she recognized the infant Jesus, as the Messiah. These records testify that women are chosen by Yahweh in different times, for various positions, but never to be priests. The key to this problems lies in the words the translators chose to use.

Since we are dealing with controversy in this manner, caution is in order because we seemingly find contradictions in the scriptures. A short search reveals that in Joel 2:28-32, Acts 2:16-21, where Joel's prophecy is twice in the New Testament, it speaks of the Daughters of Israel "shall prophesy."

Observe these important factors here. - Only the sons or daughters of Israel will prophesy (heathen cannot). -The word prophesy use here in both Testament s is either the Hebrew "naba" or the Greek word "propheteou." Either way, they translate to "speaking under inspiration" (which could include predicting) or the word refers to, "sing by inspiration." The same rule applies to 1Cor. 11:5 where dress codes are recommended but implicate that women may "prophesieth" in church. Bit, to translate this to Yahweh's approval to ordain women to the priesthood or to stand in the pulpit teaching men is distorting and mocking the scriptures. -It should be kept in mind that both scriptures from Joel 2 and Acts 2 are prophesies for the last days (Acts 2:17), thus at that time Yahweh may ordain a few of His worthy daughters (but feel assured, it will not be members of N.O.W.). -Last, any of the meanings listed above could have been applied to the word "prophesied," as in Acts 19:6: "to teach, refute, reprove, admonish, or comfort others." (Thayer's Greek-English Lexicon, #4395, page 553). So why did they use the word least applicable?


Gen 3:16 Unto the woman He said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule ove thee.

1 Cor 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the chuches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saiththe law. :35 And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

1 Tim 2:8 I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting. :9 In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly arrayl :10 But (which becometh women professing godliness) withe good works. :11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. :12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. :13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve. :14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgressin. :15 Not withstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.


May Yahweh bless our good Christian women, the Marys, Marthas and Elizabeths in our churches, we need them desperately. Yahweh knows we would all fail without them.



jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition


Hit Counter


Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party